🕷️ Crawler Inspector

URL Lookup

Direct Parameter Lookup

Raw Queries and Responses

1. Shard Calculation

Query:

Response:

Calculated Shard: 165 (from laksa121)

2. Crawled Status Check

Query:

curl -X POST \
  'http://laksa165.int.ahrefs:8124/' \
  -H 'Content-Type: text/plain' \
  -H 'X-ClickHouse-Database: crawler3' \
  -H 'Authorization: Basic YXBpOg==' \
  -d 'SELECT getAhrefsURLFromUnparsed(src_unparsed) AS found_url, ifNull(toUnixTimestamp(download_stamp), 0) AS crawl_time, ifNull(toUnixTimestamp(props_url_first_seen), 0) AS first_indexed_time, download_http_code AS http_code, src_unparsed AS src_unparsed, src_root_hash AS src_root_hash, history_drop_reason AS history_drop_reason, meta_title AS meta_title, meta_descriptions AS meta_descriptions, attrs_boilerpipe_text AS attrs_boilerpipe_text, attrs_markdown AS attrs_markdown, attrs_readable_markdown AS attrs_readable_markdown, meta_canonical AS meta_canonical FROM crawler3.page_info_local FINAL PREWHERE (src_root_hash, src_unparsed) IN ((getAhrefsRootHashFromUnparsed(getAhrefsUnparsedNoserviceFromURL(\'https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/premium/4486158/film-feminist-frankenstein-review-the-bride/\')), getAhrefsUnparsedNoserviceFromURL(\'https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/premium/4486158/film-feminist-frankenstein-review-the-bride/\'))) FORMAT JSONEachRow'

Response:

{"found_url":"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/premium\/4486158\/film-feminist-frankenstein-review-the-bride\/","crawl_time":1776002467,"first_indexed_time":1773397139,"http_code":200,"src_unparsed":"com,washingtonexaminer!www,\/premium\/4486158\/film-feminist-frankenstein-review-the-bride\/ s443","src_root_hash":"1167113907466770565","history_drop_reason":null,"meta_title":"Feminist Frankenstein: Review of The Bride!","meta_descriptions":["Maggie Gyllenhaal’s invigoratingly loopy new horror comedy The Bride! overcomes preachiness with sheer stylishness."],"attrs_boilerpipe_text":"Maggie Gyllenhaal’s invigoratingly loopy new horror\ncomedy\nThe Bride!\novercomes preachiness with sheer stylishness. Although she works overtime to wring\n#MeToo-ready\nself-righteousness from the classic she is remaking (James Whale’s 1935 monster movie\nBride of Frankenstein\n), Gyllenhaal turns out to be far less adept at\nfeminist propaganda\nthan she is at overseeing eye-catching photography and bracingly original sets, music, and costumes. That the\nmovie\nsucceeds in spite of itself is an encouragement in two ways: that aggressively off-kilter projects still have a route to the big screen, and that genuinely talented filmmakers, like Gyllenhaal, can get out of their own way. \nWhile most remakes either blatantly rehash their source material or blandly contemporize it, Gyllenhaal announces from the first frame that she has something different on tap: The film opens in black-and-white with Jessie Buckley as a spectral incarnation of Mary Shelley, the English author of the novel\nFrankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus\n. True to the film’s feminist orientation, this Shelley seems to have a chip on her shoulder: despite having written one of the widely agreed-upon masterpieces of the\nhorror\ngenre, she seems to feel that she never quite told the story she wanted to. It is in the actualization of that story — which, in reality, is entirely of Gyllenhaal’s own concoction — that the movie comes alive. In the movie’s fuzzy metaphysics, Shelley wills herself into the consciousness of a character named Ida (also played by Buckley), a young woman angling for survival in 1930s\nChicago\n— a colorful, dangerous world of bawdy lotharios and lethal gangsters. The gambit that Shelley somehow comes to possess her fictional creation is sustained, as Ida alternates between a very American dialect and a more high-toned British accent. This, not her work in\nHamnet\n(2025), is the part Buckley ought to be\nOscar-nominated\nfor.\nNo less imaginative is the importation of the story from\nEurope\nto midcentury America. This allows the film to include among its sights rollicking nightclubs, decadent parties, and grand movie palaces, though Gyllenhaal intentionally incorporates elements that are not appropriate to the ’30s setting: one scene shows moviegoers transfixed by 3D, a technology that did not attain ubiquity until a decade or so later. Yet the film’s freewheeling maximalism is one of its greatest pleasures: Gyllenhaal pours into her blender not only time periods, but tones, acting styles, and genres.\nChristian Bale and Jessie Buckley in ‘The Bride!’ (Niko Tavenise\/Warner Bros. Pictures)\nThe Bride!\nbegins fast and furiously when Ida runs afoul of a Chicago Mafioso called Lupino (Zlatko Buric) — the film’s depiction of the mob has something of the farcical, frenetic quality of\nSome Like It Hot\n(1959). Ida meets her end after being pushed down a flight of stairs. In a movie where the violence is quick but intense, her head is slammed, and her limbs become mangled, but since this is a derivation of the\nFrankenstein\nseries, we know that she only appears to be among the dead. Enter Christian Bale, who plays Frank — the once-deceased creature reconstituted by an unseen Dr. Frankenstein — in the long and honorable tradition of hulking but strangely sweet depictions of the monster. Bale is at times as menacing as Boris Karloff in the original monster movies, and he is often as funny as Peter Boyle in Mel Brooks’s\nYoung Frankenstein\n(1974), but to these performances, he adds a particularly plangent naivete. It’s one of Bale’s most sensitive performances, strange though as it sounds to say.\nTo evade detection, or out of simple self-consciousness about his appearance, Frank loses himself in the dark of the movies. He is a devotee of a supercilious star of frothy black-and-white comedy-musicals, Ronnie Reed (Jake Gyllenhaal, the filmmaker’s brother). His knowledge of classic cinema is encyclopedic, and only the stone-hearted could not laugh at Bale’s accent, which renders “Ginger” (as in Ginger Rogers) as “Gingah.”\nDespite the solace he takes in the silver screen, though, this Frank is afflicted with the same condition as all previous film Frankensteins: the dull, persistent pain of loneliness. He prevails upon Dr. Euphronious (Annette Bening) to excavate a deceased female, revivify her with the aid of electricity, and anoint her his wife, or wife-to-be, or something similar. This is within the powers of Dr. Euphronious, who represents one of the film’s most striking continuities with\nBride of Frankenstein\nin her mad-scientist-like eccentricity. \nIda thus becomes Frank’s bride, helpmeet, helpmate, lady, and\/or wife — to name the litany of titles with which she identifies herself. Undoubtedly, Maggie Gyllenhaal means Frank’s resuscitation of Ida to represent a further exploitation of a heroine who, undeniably, received rough treatment during her actual pre-undead state. Certainly, Gyllenhaal intends for Ida’s identification of herself as a “bride” or “helpmeet” to be ironic. Yet the film is susceptible to the appeal of its leads: simply put, we want Frank and the Bride to be a couple, especially after they are compelled to evade law enforcement midway through. Plus, the movie is simply too goofy and good-natured for any of its feminist agitation to land. One passage depicts the\nBonnie-and-Clyde-like notoriety of Frank and the Bride, leading o\nrdinary women to adopt her wild hairdo and goth makeup (including what are evidently meant to be burns on her mouth and tongue from all that electricity). But it’s not at all clear that the women imitating the Bride are doing so because they are future Betty Friedan acolytes or merely because the Bride looks cool. I think it’s the latter.\nFILM — NIGHTMARISH CRINGE: A REVIEW OF ‘DREAMS’ \nGyllenhaal would have been wise to drop any sociopolitical notions she had about the story and instead embrace it as an opportunity for extravagant weirdness, for which she has a gift. In one extraordinary sequence, Frank comes into contact with his hero, the movie star Ronnie Reed, and after a less-than-satisfactory interaction, he expresses his feelings by dancing like a man possessed to “Puttin’ on the Ritz.” Yes, it’s a direct lift from\nYoung Frankenstein\n, but as staged by Gyllenhaal, it becomes a mass dance number in which the Bride and dozens of others join Frank as though they are incapable of\nnot\nmoving to the music. It’s a bit like the “Day-O” scene in\nBeetlejuice\n(1988). And, playing a detective and his secretary attempting to ascertain the Bride’s whereabouts, Peter Sarsgaard and Penelope Cruz have just the right note of offhand oddness that suggests neither is taking the movie too seriously. \nAudiences alert to signs of creeping wokeness will find plenty of irritants throughout\nThe Bride!\n, but those willing to separate the wheat from the chaff will find, underneath Gyllenhaal’s failed messaging, a movie of considerable creativity. An indie actress to remember in films like\nDonnie Darko\n(2001),\nAdaptation\n(2002), and\nCrazy Heart\n(2009), Gyllenhaal made her directorial debut in 2021 with\nThe Lost Daughter\n. That small-scale drama was a world away from the extravagances of\nThe Bride!\n, but when I interviewed the actress-turned filmmaker for a magazine piece back then, I took note of her appreciative references to adventuresome directors like Nicolas Roeg and to profoundly odd and unnerving movies like Roman Polanski’s\nThe Tenant\n(1976). Despite some of her solemn intentions, with\nThe Bride!\n, she has delivered a film worthy of those bizarro predecessors.\nPeter Tonguette is the film critic for the\nWashington Examiner\nmagazine.","attrs_markdown":"- [Sign In](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/sign-in\/)\n- [Home](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/)\n- [News](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/news\/)\n  - [Politics](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/politics\/)\n    - [White House](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/news\/white-house\/)\n    - [Senate](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/news\/senate\/)\n    - [House](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/news\/house\/)\n    - [Campaigns](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/news\/campaigns\/)\n- [Policy](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/policy\/)\n- [2026 Election](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/2026-election\/)\n- [Opinion](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/opinion\/)\n  - [Editorials](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/opinion\/editorials\/)\n  - [Op-Eds](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/op-eds\/)\n- [In Focus](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/in_focus)\n- [Restoring America](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/restoring-america\/)\n- [Magazine](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/magazine)\n- [Watch](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/watch\/)\n- [Sponsored](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/premium\/4486158\/film-feminist-frankenstein-review-the-bride\/)\n  - [Powering Progress](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/sponsored\/?prx_t=ezgKARDp2A1LgTA&ntv_acpl=1292500&ntv_acsc=0&ntv_avcsc=0&ntv_ot=0&ntv_plt=1292500_63040&ntv_ui=165aa386-7a56-4e2f-b3ab-36bb5c6c42e8&ntv_ht=ZDBUaQA)\n  - [ASAE – Association Leadership](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/sponsored\/?prx_t=fDgKARTp2AhEAXA&ntv_acpl=1523844&ntv_acsc=0&ntv_avcsc=0&ntv_ot=0&ntv_plt=1523844_67998&ntv_pcc=is-oQch7H3sWbHUs166Rw1zpZE7pIIVlRfRnAnPtS_jXsTR0IIBXKhhcGKHgUxbX&ntv_ui=8eb3f3c7-5b7f-4abe-b62c-56f6511a7723&ntv_ht=8jVTaQA)\n  - [Examining Tax Reform](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/taxreform)\n  - [Fix TSCA](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/fixtsca)\n  - [National Parks](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/national-parks\/)\n  - [Inside the Corn Belt](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/sponsored\/?as-farmers-grow-america-thrives&ntv_adpz=4125)\n- [TWS Archive](https:\/\/washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/tws-archive\/)\n\n[![Logo](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/2023-examinar-logo.webp)Washington Examiner](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/ \"Washington Examiner\")\n\n[Subscribe](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/subscribe\/digital \"Subscribe\")\n\n[![Logo](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/2023-examinar-logo-comp.webp)Washington Examiner](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/ \"Washington Examiner\")\n\n[Sign in](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/sign-in \"Sign in\")\n\n[Subscribe](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/subscribe\/digital \"Subscribe\")\n\n- [News](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/news\/)\n  - [Politics](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/politics\/)\n    - [Trump Administration](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/trump-administration\/)\n    - [White House](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/news\/white-house\/)\n    - [Senate](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/senate\/)\n    - [House](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/news\/house\/)\n    - [Campaigns](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/news\/campaigns\/)\n  - [Business](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/news\/business\/)\n  - [World](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/news\/world\/)\n  - [Investigations](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/news\/investigations\/)\n  - [Justice](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/justice\/)\n  - [Supreme Court](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/news\/supreme-court\/)\n  - [Crime](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/news\/crime\/)\n  - [Entertainment](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/news\/entertainment\/)\n  - [Washington Secrets](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/news\/washington-secrets\/)\n- [Policy](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/policy\/)\n  - [Defense](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/policy\/defense\/)\n  - [National Security](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/policy\/national-security\/)\n  - [Energy and Environment](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/policy\/energy-and-environment\/)\n  - [Education](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/policy\/education\/)\n  - [Immigration](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/policy\/immigration\/)\n  - [Finance and Economy](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/policy\/finance-and-economy\/)\n  - [Healthcare](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/policy\/healthcare\/)\n  - [Foreign Policy](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/policy\/foreign-policy\/)\n  - [Tech](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/policy\/technology\/)\n  - [Infrastructure](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/policy\/infrastructure\/)\n  - [Space](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/policy\/space\/)\n- [2026 Election](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/2026-election\/)\n- [Trump Administration](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/trump-administration\/)\n- [IN FOCUS](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/in_focus\/)\n- [Commentary](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/opinion\/)\n  - [Columnists](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/opinion\/columnists\/)\n  - [Editorials](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/opinion\/editorials\/)\n  - [Think Tanks](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/think-tanks\/)\n  - [Beltway Confidential](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/opinion\/beltway-confidential\/)\n  - [Op-Eds](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/op-eds\/)\n- [Restoring America](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/restoring-america)\n  - [Patriotism and Unity](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/restoring-america\/patriotism-unity\/)\n  - [Faith, Freedom, and Self-Reliance](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/restoring-america\/faith-freedom-self-reliance\/)\n  - [Courage, Strength, and Optimism](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/restoring-america\/courage-strength-optimism\/)\n  - [Equality, Not Elitism](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/restoring-america\/equality-not-elitism\/)\n  - [Community and Family](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/restoring-america\/community-family\/)\n  - [Fairness and Justice](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/restoring-america\/fairness-justice\/)\n  - [Mission](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/about-restoring-america\/)\n\nMore\n\n- [Watch](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/watch\/)\n- [Magazine](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/magazine)\n  - [Magazine](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/magazine)\n  - [Quarterly Briefing](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/quarterly-briefing\/)\n  - [Archives](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/editions\/)\n  - [Games](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/games)\n- [Sponsored]()\n  - [Powering Progress](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/sponsored\/?prx_t=ezgKARDp2A1LgTA&ntv_acpl=1292500&ntv_acsc=0&ntv_avcsc=0&ntv_ot=0&ntv_plt=1292500_63040&ntv_ui=165aa386-7a56-4e2f-b3ab-36bb5c6c42e8&ntv_ht=ZDBUaQA)\n  - [ASAE – Association Leadership](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/sponsored\/?prx_t=fDgKARTp2AhEAXA&ntv_acpl=1523844&ntv_acsc=0&ntv_avcsc=0&ntv_ot=0&ntv_plt=1523844_67998&ntv_pcc=is-oQch7H3sWbHUs166Rw1zpZE7pIIVlRfRnAnPtS_jXsTR0IIBXKhhcGKHgUxbX&ntv_ui=8eb3f3c7-5b7f-4abe-b62c-56f6511a7723&ntv_ht=8jVTaQA)\n  - [National Parks](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/national-parks\/)\n  - [Examining Tax Reform](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/taxreform)\n  - [Fix TSCA](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/fixtsca)\n  - [Inside the Corn Belt](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/sponsored\/?as-farmers-grow-america-thrives&ntv_adpz=4125)\n- [Newsletters](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/newsletters)\n\n[Entertainment](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/news\/entertainment\/)\n\n# Feminist Frankenstein: Review of The Bride\\!\nBy [Peter Tonguette](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/author\/peter-tonguette\/)\n\nPublished March 13, 2026 6:16am ET\n\n***\n[Add Washington Examiner on Google](https:\/\/www.google.com\/preferences\/source?q=washingtonexaminer.com)\n***\n![Feminist Frankenstein: Review of The Bride\\!](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/LA.Film_.031826.jpg)\n\nChristian Bale and Jessie Buckley in 'The Bride!' (Niko Tavenise\/Warner Bros. Pictures)\n***\nMaggie Gyllenhaal’s invigoratingly loopy new horror [comedy](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/comedy\/) *The Bride\\!* overcomes preachiness with sheer stylishness. Although she works overtime to wring [\\#MeToo-ready](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/metoo\/) self-righteousness from the classic she is remaking (James Whale’s 1935 monster movie *Bride of Frankenstein*), Gyllenhaal turns out to be far less adept at [feminist propaganda](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/feminism\/) than she is at overseeing eye-catching photography and bracingly original sets, music, and costumes. That the [movie](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/movies-and-films\/) succeeds in spite of itself is an encouragement in two ways: that aggressively off-kilter projects still have a route to the big screen, and that genuinely talented filmmakers, like Gyllenhaal, can get out of their own way.\n\nWhile most remakes either blatantly rehash their source material or blandly contemporize it, Gyllenhaal announces from the first frame that she has something different on tap: The film opens in black-and-white with Jessie Buckley as a spectral incarnation of Mary Shelley, the English author of the novel *Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus*. True to the film’s feminist orientation, this Shelley seems to have a chip on her shoulder: despite having written one of the widely agreed-upon masterpieces of the [horror](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/horror\/) genre, she seems to feel that she never quite told the story she wanted to. It is in the actualization of that story — which, in reality, is entirely of Gyllenhaal’s own concoction — that the movie comes alive. In the movie’s fuzzy metaphysics, Shelley wills herself into the consciousness of a character named Ida (also played by Buckley), a young woman angling for survival in 1930s [Chicago](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/chicago\/) — a colorful, dangerous world of bawdy lotharios and lethal gangsters. The gambit that Shelley somehow comes to possess her fictional creation is sustained, as Ida alternates between a very American dialect and a more high-toned British accent. This, not her work in *Hamnet* (2025), is the part Buckley ought to be [Oscar-nominated](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/oscars\/) for.\n\n# Recommended Stories\n[![‘Meathead bros’ and ‘pink-haired weirdos’ in agreement on antisemitism: Bill Maher](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/billmaher-e1775925132253.png?w=150&h=150&crop=1) ‘Meathead bros’ and ‘pink-haired weirdos’ in agreement on antisemitism: Bill Maher](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/news\/entertainment\/4525499\/meathead-bros-pink-haired-weirdos-antisemitism\/?itm_source=parsely-api)\n\n[![Fox’s Maria Bartiromo honored with prestigious award](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/horatio1-rotated-e1775922535752.jpeg?w=150&h=150&crop=1) Fox’s Maria Bartiromo honored with prestigious award](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/news\/entertainment\/4525381\/fox-maria-bartiromo-honored-with-prestigious-award\/?itm_source=parsely-api)\n\n[![Tim Burchett to Stephen A. Smith on UFO sightings: ‘It’s not Independence Day’](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/SmithBurchett-e1775850249710.png?w=150&h=150&crop=1) Tim Burchett to Stephen A. Smith on UFO sightings: ‘It’s not Independence Day’](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/news\/entertainment\/4524824\/tim-burchett-ufo-sightings-its-not-independence-day-stephen-a-smith\/?itm_source=parsely-api)\n\nNo less imaginative is the importation of the story from [Europe](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/europe\/) to midcentury America. This allows the film to include among its sights rollicking nightclubs, decadent parties, and grand movie palaces, though Gyllenhaal intentionally incorporates elements that are not appropriate to the ’30s setting: one scene shows moviegoers transfixed by 3D, a technology that did not attain ubiquity until a decade or so later. Yet the film’s freewheeling maximalism is one of its greatest pleasures: Gyllenhaal pours into her blender not only time periods, but tones, acting styles, and genres.\n\n![Christian Bale and Jessie Buckley in 'The Bride!' (Niko Tavenise\/Warner Bros. Pictures)](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/LA.Film_.031826.jpg?w=696)\n\nChristian Bale and Jessie Buckley in ‘The Bride!’ (Niko Tavenise\/Warner Bros. Pictures)\n\n*The Bride\\!* begins fast and furiously when Ida runs afoul of a Chicago Mafioso called Lupino (Zlatko Buric) — the film’s depiction of the mob has something of the farcical, frenetic quality of *Some Like It Hot* (1959). Ida meets her end after being pushed down a flight of stairs. In a movie where the violence is quick but intense, her head is slammed, and her limbs become mangled, but since this is a derivation of the *Frankenstein* series, we know that she only appears to be among the dead. Enter Christian Bale, who plays Frank — the once-deceased creature reconstituted by an unseen Dr. Frankenstein — in the long and honorable tradition of hulking but strangely sweet depictions of the monster. Bale is at times as menacing as Boris Karloff in the original monster movies, and he is often as funny as Peter Boyle in Mel Brooks’s *Young Frankenstein* (1974), but to these performances, he adds a particularly plangent naivete. It’s one of Bale’s most sensitive performances, strange though as it sounds to say.\n\nTo evade detection, or out of simple self-consciousness about his appearance, Frank loses himself in the dark of the movies. He is a devotee of a supercilious star of frothy black-and-white comedy-musicals, Ronnie Reed (Jake Gyllenhaal, the filmmaker’s brother). His knowledge of classic cinema is encyclopedic, and only the stone-hearted could not laugh at Bale’s accent, which renders “Ginger” (as in Ginger Rogers) as “Gingah.”\n\nDespite the solace he takes in the silver screen, though, this Frank is afflicted with the same condition as all previous film Frankensteins: the dull, persistent pain of loneliness. He prevails upon Dr. Euphronious (Annette Bening) to excavate a deceased female, revivify her with the aid of electricity, and anoint her his wife, or wife-to-be, or something similar. This is within the powers of Dr. Euphronious, who represents one of the film’s most striking continuities with *Bride of Frankenstein* in her mad-scientist-like eccentricity.\n\nIda thus becomes Frank’s bride, helpmeet, helpmate, lady, and\/or wife — to name the litany of titles with which she identifies herself. Undoubtedly, Maggie Gyllenhaal means Frank’s resuscitation of Ida to represent a further exploitation of a heroine who, undeniably, received rough treatment during her actual pre-undead state. Certainly, Gyllenhaal intends for Ida’s identification of herself as a “bride” or “helpmeet” to be ironic. Yet the film is susceptible to the appeal of its leads: simply put, we want Frank and the Bride to be a couple, especially after they are compelled to evade law enforcement midway through. Plus, the movie is simply too goofy and good-natured for any of its feminist agitation to land. One passage depicts the Bonnie-and-Clyde-like notoriety of Frank and the Bride, leading ordinary women to adopt her wild hairdo and goth makeup (including what are evidently meant to be burns on her mouth and tongue from all that electricity). But it’s not at all clear that the women imitating the Bride are doing so because they are future Betty Friedan acolytes or merely because the Bride looks cool. I think it’s the latter.\n\n[**FILM — NIGHTMARISH CRINGE: A REVIEW OF ‘DREAMS’**](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/premium\/4477862\/review-dreams-movie\/)\n\nGyllenhaal would have been wise to drop any sociopolitical notions she had about the story and instead embrace it as an opportunity for extravagant weirdness, for which she has a gift. In one extraordinary sequence, Frank comes into contact with his hero, the movie star Ronnie Reed, and after a less-than-satisfactory interaction, he expresses his feelings by dancing like a man possessed to “Puttin’ on the Ritz.” Yes, it’s a direct lift from *Young Frankenstein*, but as staged by Gyllenhaal, it becomes a mass dance number in which the Bride and dozens of others join Frank as though they are incapable of *not* moving to the music. It’s a bit like the “Day-O” scene in *Beetlejuice* (1988). And, playing a detective and his secretary attempting to ascertain the Bride’s whereabouts, Peter Sarsgaard and Penelope Cruz have just the right note of offhand oddness that suggests neither is taking the movie too seriously.\n\nAudiences alert to signs of creeping wokeness will find plenty of irritants throughout *The Bride\\!*, but those willing to separate the wheat from the chaff will find, underneath Gyllenhaal’s failed messaging, a movie of considerable creativity. An indie actress to remember in films like *Donnie Darko* (2001), *Adaptation* (2002), and *Crazy Heart* (2009), Gyllenhaal made her directorial debut in 2021 with *The Lost Daughter*. That small-scale drama was a world away from the extravagances of *The Bride\\!*, but when I interviewed the actress-turned filmmaker for a magazine piece back then, I took note of her appreciative references to adventuresome directors like Nicolas Roeg and to profoundly odd and unnerving movies like Roman Polanski’s *The Tenant* (1976). Despite some of her solemn intentions, with *The Bride\\!*, she has delivered a film worthy of those bizarro predecessors.\n\n*Peter Tonguette is the film critic for the* Washington Examiner *magazine.*\n\n***\n### Tag:\n[Comedy](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/comedy\/)   [Culture](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/culture\/)   [Entertainment](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/entertainment\/)   [Feminism](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/feminism\/)   [Hollywood](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/hollywood\/)   [Horror](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/horror\/)   [Magazine - Life & Arts](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/magazine-life-arts\/)   [Movies and Films](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/movies-and-films\/)\n***\n\n# Magazine\n[![Magazine Covers](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/C1_WSX041526.jpg?w=696)](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/magazine\/)\n\n[Subscribe](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/subscribe\/digital\/)\n\n**[The government union sinkhole: Public-sector unions are making blue states ungovernable](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/premium\/4520071\/public-sector-unions-making-blue-states-ungovernable\/)**\n\n**[Can the Democrats get religion?](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/premium\/4522816\/can-democrats-get-religion\/)**\n\n**[Kash Patel and Sen. David McCormick team up to fight fentanyl in Pennsylvania](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/premium\/4521281\/fighting-fentanyl-pennsylvania\/)**\n\n# [More from Entertainment](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/news\/entertainment\/)\n[![‘Meathead bros’ and ‘pink-haired weirdos’ in agreement on antisemitism: Bill Maher ](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/billmaher-e1775925132253.png?w=300) ‘Meathead bros’ and ‘pink-haired weirdos’ in agreement on antisemitism: Bill Maher](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/news\/entertainment\/4525499\/meathead-bros-pink-haired-weirdos-antisemitism\/)\n***\n[![Fox’s Maria Bartiromo honored with prestigious award](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/horatio1-rotated-e1775922535752.jpeg?w=225) Fox’s Maria Bartiromo honored with prestigious award](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/news\/entertainment\/4525381\/fox-maria-bartiromo-honored-with-prestigious-award\/)\n***\n[![Tim Burchett to Stephen A. Smith on UFO sightings: ‘It’s not Independence Day’](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/SmithBurchett-e1775850249710.png?w=300) Tim Burchett to Stephen A. Smith on UFO sightings: ‘It’s not Independence Day’](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/news\/entertainment\/4524824\/tim-burchett-ufo-sightings-its-not-independence-day-stephen-a-smith\/)\n***\n[![Tucker Carlson sells Trump’s MAGA-dividing namecalling with new merch: ‘Low IQ’](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/AP26063078726684.jpg?w=300) Tucker Carlson sells Trump’s MAGA-dividing namecalling with new merch: ‘Low IQ’](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/news\/entertainment\/4524598\/tucker-carlson-sell-low-iq-merch\/)\n***\n[![Democrats’ criticism of Iran is ‘so phony’: Joe Concha](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/trumpiranphony.jpg?w=300) Democrats’ criticism of Iran is ‘so phony’: Joe Concha](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/news\/entertainment\/4524249\/democrats-criticism-iran-so-phony-joe-concha\/)\n***\n\nGas Tracker\n\nUpdated Daily\n\nToday's National Average\n\n\\$4\\.14\n\n\\-\\$0.02\n\nPrice per gallon of regular unleaded in the U.S.  Change since **Apr. 11, 2026** · Source: [AAA](https:\/\/gasprices.aaa.com\/)\n\n# TRENDING NOW\n[![The surprisingly triumphant return of ‘The Naked Gun’](https:\/\/images.parsely.com\/_wBPpjyudHfd7frNkpXobza3XA0=\/85x85\/smart\/https%3A\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/LA.Film_.081325-150x150.webp) The surprisingly triumphant return of ‘The Naked Gun’](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/premium\/3491183\/the-naked-gun-movie-police-humor-summer-2020-protests-george-floyd\/?itm_source=parsely-api)\n***\n[![The surprisingly triumphant return of ‘The Naked Gun’](https:\/\/images.parsely.com\/x7MQAQk8P1pmpjS3mUbSQiFN7Yc=\/85x85\/smart\/https%3A\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/08\/LA.Film_.081325.webp%3Fw%3D150%26h%3D150%26crop%3D1) The surprisingly triumphant return of ‘The Naked Gun’](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/opinion\/3491183\/the-naked-gun-movie-police-humor-summer-2020-protests-george-floyd\/?itm_source=parsely-api)\n***\n[![An undivided Kill Bill demands your undivided attention](https:\/\/images.parsely.com\/LTVbzL76tNQjb_LTZWpZKEpnXEY=\/85x85\/smart\/https%3A\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/LA.OnCulture.122425.jpg%3Fw%3D150%26h%3D150%26crop%3D1) An undivided Kill Bill demands your undivided attention](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/premium\/3917546\/kill-bill-the-whole-bloody-affair-demands-undivided-attention\/?itm_source=parsely-api)\n***\n[![Oscars 2026](https:\/\/images.parsely.com\/UJ_eUk7534j646zG2BjHqusSvu0=\/85x85\/smart\/https%3A\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/LA.Film_.Oscars.032526.jpg%3Fw%3D150%26h%3D150%26crop%3D1) Oscars 2026](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/premium\/4496795\/oscars-2026-revi\/?itm_source=parsely-api)\n***\n[![When ‘The Shining’ was overlooked](https:\/\/images.parsely.com\/dv30kJrNUiNrTsc6Oic-t7uuVF8=\/85x85\/smart\/https%3A\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/AP18121036514171.jpg%3Fw%3D150%26h%3D150%26crop%3D1) When ‘The Shining’ was overlooked](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/opinion\/3416298\/stanley-kubricks-the-shining-book\/?itm_source=parsely-api)\n***\n\n[![Logo](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/2023-Examiner-logo-white-color-eagle-1-1.png)Washington Examiner](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/ \"Washington Examiner\")\n\n[Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information]()\n\n[Facebook](https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/WashingtonExaminer\/ \"Facebook\")\n\n[Twitter](https:\/\/twitter.com\/DCExaminer \"Twitter\")\n\n[Youtube](https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@washingtonexaminer \"Youtube\")\n\n## NEWS\n- [Politics](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/politics\/)\n  - [White House](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/news\/white-house\/)\n  - [Senate](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/senate\/)\n  - [House](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/news\/house\/)\n  - [Campaigns](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/news\/campaigns\/)\n- [Business](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/news\/business\/)\n- [World](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/world\/)\n- [Investigations](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/Investigations\/)\n- [Justice](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/news\/justice\/)\n- [Supreme Court](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/supreme-court\/)\n- [Crime](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/news\/crime\/)\n- [Washington Secrets](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/news\/washington-secrets\/)\n- [Entertainment](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/entertainment\/)\n- [Sports](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/sports\/)\n\n## POLICY\n- [Defense](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/policy\/defense\/)\n- [National Security](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/policy\/national-security\/)\n- [Energy](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/policy\/energy\/)\n- [Immigration](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/policy\/immigration\/)\n- [Finance and Economy](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/policy\/finance-and-economy\/)\n- [Healthcare](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/policy\/healthcare\/)\n- [Foreign Policy](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/policy\/foreign-policy\/)\n- [Tech](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/policy\/technology\/)\n- [Infrastructure](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/policy\/infrastructure\/)\n- [Space](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/policy\/space\/)\n\n## COMMENTARY\n- [Columnists](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/opinion\/columnists\/)\n- [Editorials](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/opinion\/editorials\/)\n- [Think Tanks](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/think-tanks\/)\n- [Beltway Confidential](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/opinion\/beltway-confidential\/)\n- [Op-Eds](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/op-eds\/)\n\n## RESTORING AMERICA\n- [Patriotism and Unity](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/restoring-america\/patriotism-unity\/)\n- [Faith, Freedom, and Self-Reliance](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/restoring-america\/faith-freedom-self-reliance\/)\n- [Courage, Strength, and Optimism](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/restoring-america\/courage-strength-optimism\/)\n- [Equality, Not Elitism](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/restoring-america\/equality-not-elitism\/)\n- [Community and Family](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/restoring-america\/community-family\/)\n- [Fairness and Justice](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/restoring-america\/fairness-justice\/)\n- [Mission](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/about-restoring-america\/)\n\n- [WATCH](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/watch\/)\n- [IN FOCUS](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/section\/in_focus\/)\n- [NEWSLETTERS](https:\/\/newsletters.washingtonexaminer.com\/)\n- [MAGAZINE ARCHIVE](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/editions)\n\n- [Policies and Standards](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/policies-and-standards)\n- [Terms Of Service](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/terms)\n\n- [Subscription Terms of Use](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/subscription-agreement)\n- [Privacy Policy](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/privacy-policy)\n- [Your Privacy Choices](https:\/\/privacyportal.onetrust.com\/webform\/c7968fb5-dd42-4c76-8f79-3e5198bd1303\/350db353-4891-4bd9-bc4d-2d772943bd13)\n\n- [Transparency In Coverage](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/transparency-in-coverage)\n- [Advertise](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/advertise)\n- [Subscribe](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/subscribe\/digital\/)\n\n- [Contact](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/contact\/)\n- [Careers](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/careers)\n- [Staff](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/staff-2)\n\n- [About Examiner](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/about)\n- [Facebook](https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/WashingtonExaminer\/)\n- [Twitter](https:\/\/twitter.com\/DCExaminer)\n\n- © Copyright 2026. Washington Examiner. All Rights Reserved.","attrs_readable_markdown":"Maggie Gyllenhaal’s invigoratingly loopy new horror [comedy](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/comedy\/) *The Bride\\!* overcomes preachiness with sheer stylishness. Although she works overtime to wring [\\#MeToo-ready](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/metoo\/) self-righteousness from the classic she is remaking (James Whale’s 1935 monster movie *Bride of Frankenstein*), Gyllenhaal turns out to be far less adept at [feminist propaganda](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/feminism\/) than she is at overseeing eye-catching photography and bracingly original sets, music, and costumes. That the [movie](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/movies-and-films\/) succeeds in spite of itself is an encouragement in two ways: that aggressively off-kilter projects still have a route to the big screen, and that genuinely talented filmmakers, like Gyllenhaal, can get out of their own way.\n\nWhile most remakes either blatantly rehash their source material or blandly contemporize it, Gyllenhaal announces from the first frame that she has something different on tap: The film opens in black-and-white with Jessie Buckley as a spectral incarnation of Mary Shelley, the English author of the novel *Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus*. True to the film’s feminist orientation, this Shelley seems to have a chip on her shoulder: despite having written one of the widely agreed-upon masterpieces of the [horror](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/horror\/) genre, she seems to feel that she never quite told the story she wanted to. It is in the actualization of that story — which, in reality, is entirely of Gyllenhaal’s own concoction — that the movie comes alive. In the movie’s fuzzy metaphysics, Shelley wills herself into the consciousness of a character named Ida (also played by Buckley), a young woman angling for survival in 1930s [Chicago](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/chicago\/) — a colorful, dangerous world of bawdy lotharios and lethal gangsters. The gambit that Shelley somehow comes to possess her fictional creation is sustained, as Ida alternates between a very American dialect and a more high-toned British accent. This, not her work in *Hamnet* (2025), is the part Buckley ought to be [Oscar-nominated](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/oscars\/) for.\n\nNo less imaginative is the importation of the story from [Europe](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/tag\/europe\/) to midcentury America. This allows the film to include among its sights rollicking nightclubs, decadent parties, and grand movie palaces, though Gyllenhaal intentionally incorporates elements that are not appropriate to the ’30s setting: one scene shows moviegoers transfixed by 3D, a technology that did not attain ubiquity until a decade or so later. Yet the film’s freewheeling maximalism is one of its greatest pleasures: Gyllenhaal pours into her blender not only time periods, but tones, acting styles, and genres.\n\n![Christian Bale and Jessie Buckley in 'The Bride!' (Niko Tavenise\/Warner Bros. Pictures)](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/LA.Film_.031826.jpg?w=696)\n\nChristian Bale and Jessie Buckley in ‘The Bride!’ (Niko Tavenise\/Warner Bros. Pictures)\n\n*The Bride\\!* begins fast and furiously when Ida runs afoul of a Chicago Mafioso called Lupino (Zlatko Buric) — the film’s depiction of the mob has something of the farcical, frenetic quality of *Some Like It Hot* (1959). Ida meets her end after being pushed down a flight of stairs. In a movie where the violence is quick but intense, her head is slammed, and her limbs become mangled, but since this is a derivation of the *Frankenstein* series, we know that she only appears to be among the dead. Enter Christian Bale, who plays Frank — the once-deceased creature reconstituted by an unseen Dr. Frankenstein — in the long and honorable tradition of hulking but strangely sweet depictions of the monster. Bale is at times as menacing as Boris Karloff in the original monster movies, and he is often as funny as Peter Boyle in Mel Brooks’s *Young Frankenstein* (1974), but to these performances, he adds a particularly plangent naivete. It’s one of Bale’s most sensitive performances, strange though as it sounds to say.\n\nTo evade detection, or out of simple self-consciousness about his appearance, Frank loses himself in the dark of the movies. He is a devotee of a supercilious star of frothy black-and-white comedy-musicals, Ronnie Reed (Jake Gyllenhaal, the filmmaker’s brother). His knowledge of classic cinema is encyclopedic, and only the stone-hearted could not laugh at Bale’s accent, which renders “Ginger” (as in Ginger Rogers) as “Gingah.”\n\nDespite the solace he takes in the silver screen, though, this Frank is afflicted with the same condition as all previous film Frankensteins: the dull, persistent pain of loneliness. He prevails upon Dr. Euphronious (Annette Bening) to excavate a deceased female, revivify her with the aid of electricity, and anoint her his wife, or wife-to-be, or something similar. This is within the powers of Dr. Euphronious, who represents one of the film’s most striking continuities with *Bride of Frankenstein* in her mad-scientist-like eccentricity.\n\nIda thus becomes Frank’s bride, helpmeet, helpmate, lady, and\/or wife — to name the litany of titles with which she identifies herself. Undoubtedly, Maggie Gyllenhaal means Frank’s resuscitation of Ida to represent a further exploitation of a heroine who, undeniably, received rough treatment during her actual pre-undead state. Certainly, Gyllenhaal intends for Ida’s identification of herself as a “bride” or “helpmeet” to be ironic. Yet the film is susceptible to the appeal of its leads: simply put, we want Frank and the Bride to be a couple, especially after they are compelled to evade law enforcement midway through. Plus, the movie is simply too goofy and good-natured for any of its feminist agitation to land. One passage depicts the Bonnie-and-Clyde-like notoriety of Frank and the Bride, leading ordinary women to adopt her wild hairdo and goth makeup (including what are evidently meant to be burns on her mouth and tongue from all that electricity). But it’s not at all clear that the women imitating the Bride are doing so because they are future Betty Friedan acolytes or merely because the Bride looks cool. I think it’s the latter.\n\n[**FILM — NIGHTMARISH CRINGE: A REVIEW OF ‘DREAMS’**](https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/premium\/4477862\/review-dreams-movie\/)\n\nGyllenhaal would have been wise to drop any sociopolitical notions she had about the story and instead embrace it as an opportunity for extravagant weirdness, for which she has a gift. In one extraordinary sequence, Frank comes into contact with his hero, the movie star Ronnie Reed, and after a less-than-satisfactory interaction, he expresses his feelings by dancing like a man possessed to “Puttin’ on the Ritz.” Yes, it’s a direct lift from *Young Frankenstein*, but as staged by Gyllenhaal, it becomes a mass dance number in which the Bride and dozens of others join Frank as though they are incapable of *not* moving to the music. It’s a bit like the “Day-O” scene in *Beetlejuice* (1988). And, playing a detective and his secretary attempting to ascertain the Bride’s whereabouts, Peter Sarsgaard and Penelope Cruz have just the right note of offhand oddness that suggests neither is taking the movie too seriously.\n\nAudiences alert to signs of creeping wokeness will find plenty of irritants throughout *The Bride\\!*, but those willing to separate the wheat from the chaff will find, underneath Gyllenhaal’s failed messaging, a movie of considerable creativity. An indie actress to remember in films like *Donnie Darko* (2001), *Adaptation* (2002), and *Crazy Heart* (2009), Gyllenhaal made her directorial debut in 2021 with *The Lost Daughter*. That small-scale drama was a world away from the extravagances of *The Bride\\!*, but when I interviewed the actress-turned filmmaker for a magazine piece back then, I took note of her appreciative references to adventuresome directors like Nicolas Roeg and to profoundly odd and unnerving movies like Roman Polanski’s *The Tenant* (1976). Despite some of her solemn intentions, with *The Bride\\!*, she has delivered a film worthy of those bizarro predecessors.\n\n*Peter Tonguette is the film critic for the* Washington Examiner *magazine.*","meta_canonical":null}

3. Robots.txt Check

Query:

Response:

4. Spam/Ban Check

Query:

Response:

5. Seen Status Check

ℹ️ Skipped - page is already crawled

📄

INDEXABLE

✅

CRAWLED

4 days ago

🤖

ROBOTS ALLOWED

Page Info Filters

Filter	Status	Condition	Details
HTTP status	PASS	`download_http_code = 200`	HTTP 200
Age cutoff	PASS	`download_stamp > now() - 6 MONTH`	0.2 months ago
History drop	PASS	`isNull(history_drop_reason)`	No drop reason
Spam/ban	PASS	`fh_dont_index != 1 AND ml_spam_score = 0`	ml_spam_score=0
Canonical	PASS	`meta_canonical IS NULL OR = '' OR = src_unparsed`	Not set

Page Details

Property	Value
URL	https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/premium/4486158/film-feminist-frankenstein-review-the-bride/
Last Crawled	2026-04-12 14:01:07 (4 days ago)
First Indexed	2026-03-13 10:18:59 (1 month ago)
HTTP Status Code	200
Meta Title	Feminist Frankenstein: Review of The Bride!
Meta Description	Maggie Gyllenhaal’s invigoratingly loopy new horror comedy The Bride! overcomes preachiness with sheer stylishness.
Meta Canonical	null
Boilerpipe Text	Maggie Gyllenhaal’s invigoratingly loopy new horror comedy The Bride! overcomes preachiness with sheer stylishness. Although she works overtime to wring #MeToo-ready self-righteousness from the classic she is remaking (James Whale’s 1935 monster movie Bride of Frankenstein ), Gyllenhaal turns out to be far less adept at feminist propaganda than she is at overseeing eye-catching photography and bracingly original sets, music, and costumes. That the movie succeeds in spite of itself is an encouragement in two ways: that aggressively off-kilter projects still have a route to the big screen, and that genuinely talented filmmakers, like Gyllenhaal, can get out of their own way. While most remakes either blatantly rehash their source material or blandly contemporize it, Gyllenhaal announces from the first frame that she has something different on tap: The film opens in black-and-white with Jessie Buckley as a spectral incarnation of Mary Shelley, the English author of the novel Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus . True to the film’s feminist orientation, this Shelley seems to have a chip on her shoulder: despite having written one of the widely agreed-upon masterpieces of the horror genre, she seems to feel that she never quite told the story she wanted to. It is in the actualization of that story — which, in reality, is entirely of Gyllenhaal’s own concoction — that the movie comes alive. In the movie’s fuzzy metaphysics, Shelley wills herself into the consciousness of a character named Ida (also played by Buckley), a young woman angling for survival in 1930s Chicago — a colorful, dangerous world of bawdy lotharios and lethal gangsters. The gambit that Shelley somehow comes to possess her fictional creation is sustained, as Ida alternates between a very American dialect and a more high-toned British accent. This, not her work in Hamnet (2025), is the part Buckley ought to be Oscar-nominated for. No less imaginative is the importation of the story from Europe to midcentury America. This allows the film to include among its sights rollicking nightclubs, decadent parties, and grand movie palaces, though Gyllenhaal intentionally incorporates elements that are not appropriate to the ’30s setting: one scene shows moviegoers transfixed by 3D, a technology that did not attain ubiquity until a decade or so later. Yet the film’s freewheeling maximalism is one of its greatest pleasures: Gyllenhaal pours into her blender not only time periods, but tones, acting styles, and genres. Christian Bale and Jessie Buckley in ‘The Bride!’ (Niko Tavenise/Warner Bros. Pictures) The Bride! begins fast and furiously when Ida runs afoul of a Chicago Mafioso called Lupino (Zlatko Buric) — the film’s depiction of the mob has something of the farcical, frenetic quality of Some Like It Hot (1959). Ida meets her end after being pushed down a flight of stairs. In a movie where the violence is quick but intense, her head is slammed, and her limbs become mangled, but since this is a derivation of the Frankenstein series, we know that she only appears to be among the dead. Enter Christian Bale, who plays Frank — the once-deceased creature reconstituted by an unseen Dr. Frankenstein — in the long and honorable tradition of hulking but strangely sweet depictions of the monster. Bale is at times as menacing as Boris Karloff in the original monster movies, and he is often as funny as Peter Boyle in Mel Brooks’s Young Frankenstein (1974), but to these performances, he adds a particularly plangent naivete. It’s one of Bale’s most sensitive performances, strange though as it sounds to say. To evade detection, or out of simple self-consciousness about his appearance, Frank loses himself in the dark of the movies. He is a devotee of a supercilious star of frothy black-and-white comedy-musicals, Ronnie Reed (Jake Gyllenhaal, the filmmaker’s brother). His knowledge of classic cinema is encyclopedic, and only the stone-hearted could not laugh at Bale’s accent, which renders “Ginger” (as in Ginger Rogers) as “Gingah.” Despite the solace he takes in the silver screen, though, this Frank is afflicted with the same condition as all previous film Frankensteins: the dull, persistent pain of loneliness. He prevails upon Dr. Euphronious (Annette Bening) to excavate a deceased female, revivify her with the aid of electricity, and anoint her his wife, or wife-to-be, or something similar. This is within the powers of Dr. Euphronious, who represents one of the film’s most striking continuities with Bride of Frankenstein in her mad-scientist-like eccentricity. Ida thus becomes Frank’s bride, helpmeet, helpmate, lady, and/or wife — to name the litany of titles with which she identifies herself. Undoubtedly, Maggie Gyllenhaal means Frank’s resuscitation of Ida to represent a further exploitation of a heroine who, undeniably, received rough treatment during her actual pre-undead state. Certainly, Gyllenhaal intends for Ida’s identification of herself as a “bride” or “helpmeet” to be ironic. Yet the film is susceptible to the appeal of its leads: simply put, we want Frank and the Bride to be a couple, especially after they are compelled to evade law enforcement midway through. Plus, the movie is simply too goofy and good-natured for any of its feminist agitation to land. One passage depicts the Bonnie-and-Clyde-like notoriety of Frank and the Bride, leading o rdinary women to adopt her wild hairdo and goth makeup (including what are evidently meant to be burns on her mouth and tongue from all that electricity). But it’s not at all clear that the women imitating the Bride are doing so because they are future Betty Friedan acolytes or merely because the Bride looks cool. I think it’s the latter. FILM — NIGHTMARISH CRINGE: A REVIEW OF ‘DREAMS’ Gyllenhaal would have been wise to drop any sociopolitical notions she had about the story and instead embrace it as an opportunity for extravagant weirdness, for which she has a gift. In one extraordinary sequence, Frank comes into contact with his hero, the movie star Ronnie Reed, and after a less-than-satisfactory interaction, he expresses his feelings by dancing like a man possessed to “Puttin’ on the Ritz.” Yes, it’s a direct lift from Young Frankenstein , but as staged by Gyllenhaal, it becomes a mass dance number in which the Bride and dozens of others join Frank as though they are incapable of not moving to the music. It’s a bit like the “Day-O” scene in Beetlejuice (1988). And, playing a detective and his secretary attempting to ascertain the Bride’s whereabouts, Peter Sarsgaard and Penelope Cruz have just the right note of offhand oddness that suggests neither is taking the movie too seriously. Audiences alert to signs of creeping wokeness will find plenty of irritants throughout The Bride! , but those willing to separate the wheat from the chaff will find, underneath Gyllenhaal’s failed messaging, a movie of considerable creativity. An indie actress to remember in films like Donnie Darko (2001), Adaptation (2002), and Crazy Heart (2009), Gyllenhaal made her directorial debut in 2021 with The Lost Daughter . That small-scale drama was a world away from the extravagances of The Bride! , but when I interviewed the actress-turned filmmaker for a magazine piece back then, I took note of her appreciative references to adventuresome directors like Nicolas Roeg and to profoundly odd and unnerving movies like Roman Polanski’s The Tenant (1976). Despite some of her solemn intentions, with The Bride! , she has delivered a film worthy of those bizarro predecessors. Peter Tonguette is the film critic for the Washington Examiner magazine.
Markdown	- [Sign In](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/sign-in/) - [Home](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/) - [News](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/news/) - [Politics](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/politics/) - [White House](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/news/white-house/) - [Senate](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/news/senate/) - [House](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/news/house/) - [Campaigns](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/news/campaigns/) - [Policy](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/policy/) - [2026 Election](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/2026-election/) - [Opinion](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/opinion/) - [Editorials](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/opinion/editorials/) - [Op-Eds](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/op-eds/) - [In Focus](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/in_focus) - [Restoring America](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/) - [Magazine](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/magazine) - [Watch](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/watch/) - [Sponsored](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/premium/4486158/film-feminist-frankenstein-review-the-bride/) - [Powering Progress](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/sponsored/?prx_t=ezgKARDp2A1LgTA&ntv_acpl=1292500&ntv_acsc=0&ntv_avcsc=0&ntv_ot=0&ntv_plt=1292500_63040&ntv_ui=165aa386-7a56-4e2f-b3ab-36bb5c6c42e8&ntv_ht=ZDBUaQA) - [ASAE – Association Leadership](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/sponsored/?prx_t=fDgKARTp2AhEAXA&ntv_acpl=1523844&ntv_acsc=0&ntv_avcsc=0&ntv_ot=0&ntv_plt=1523844_67998&ntv_pcc=is-oQch7H3sWbHUs166Rw1zpZE7pIIVlRfRnAnPtS_jXsTR0IIBXKhhcGKHgUxbX&ntv_ui=8eb3f3c7-5b7f-4abe-b62c-56f6511a7723&ntv_ht=8jVTaQA) - [Examining Tax Reform](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/taxreform) - [Fix TSCA](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/fixtsca) - [National Parks](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/national-parks/) - [Inside the Corn Belt](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/sponsored/?as-farmers-grow-america-thrives&ntv_adpz=4125) - [TWS Archive](https://washingtonexaminer.com/tag/tws-archive/) [![Logo](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/2023-examinar-logo.webp)Washington Examiner](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ "Washington Examiner") [Subscribe](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/subscribe/digital "Subscribe") [![Logo](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/2023-examinar-logo-comp.webp)Washington Examiner](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ "Washington Examiner") [Sign in](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/sign-in "Sign in") [Subscribe](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/subscribe/digital "Subscribe") - [News](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/news/) - [Politics](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/politics/) - [Trump Administration](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/trump-administration/) - [White House](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/news/white-house/) - [Senate](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/senate/) - [House](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/news/house/) - [Campaigns](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/news/campaigns/) - [Business](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/news/business/) - [World](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/news/world/) - [Investigations](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/news/investigations/) - [Justice](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/justice/) - [Supreme Court](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/news/supreme-court/) - [Crime](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/news/crime/) - [Entertainment](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/news/entertainment/) - [Washington Secrets](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/news/washington-secrets/) - [Policy](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/policy/) - [Defense](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/policy/defense/) - [National Security](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/policy/national-security/) - [Energy and Environment](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/policy/energy-and-environment/) - [Education](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/policy/education/) - [Immigration](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/policy/immigration/) - [Finance and Economy](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/policy/finance-and-economy/) - [Healthcare](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/policy/healthcare/) - [Foreign Policy](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/policy/foreign-policy/) - [Tech](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/policy/technology/) - [Infrastructure](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/policy/infrastructure/) - [Space](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/policy/space/) - [2026 Election](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/2026-election/) - [Trump Administration](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/trump-administration/) - [IN FOCUS](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/in_focus/) - [Commentary](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/opinion/) - [Columnists](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/opinion/columnists/) - [Editorials](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/opinion/editorials/) - [Think Tanks](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/think-tanks/) - [Beltway Confidential](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/opinion/beltway-confidential/) - [Op-Eds](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/op-eds/) - [Restoring America](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america) - [Patriotism and Unity](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/restoring-america/patriotism-unity/) - [Faith, Freedom, and Self-Reliance](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/restoring-america/faith-freedom-self-reliance/) - [Courage, Strength, and Optimism](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/restoring-america/courage-strength-optimism/) - [Equality, Not Elitism](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/restoring-america/equality-not-elitism/) - [Community and Family](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/restoring-america/community-family/) - [Fairness and Justice](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/restoring-america/fairness-justice/) - [Mission](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/about-restoring-america/) More - [Watch](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/watch/) - [Magazine](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/magazine) - [Magazine](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/magazine) - [Quarterly Briefing](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/quarterly-briefing/) - [Archives](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/editions/) - [Games](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/games) - [Sponsored]() - [Powering Progress](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/sponsored/?prx_t=ezgKARDp2A1LgTA&ntv_acpl=1292500&ntv_acsc=0&ntv_avcsc=0&ntv_ot=0&ntv_plt=1292500_63040&ntv_ui=165aa386-7a56-4e2f-b3ab-36bb5c6c42e8&ntv_ht=ZDBUaQA) - [ASAE – Association Leadership](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/sponsored/?prx_t=fDgKARTp2AhEAXA&ntv_acpl=1523844&ntv_acsc=0&ntv_avcsc=0&ntv_ot=0&ntv_plt=1523844_67998&ntv_pcc=is-oQch7H3sWbHUs166Rw1zpZE7pIIVlRfRnAnPtS_jXsTR0IIBXKhhcGKHgUxbX&ntv_ui=8eb3f3c7-5b7f-4abe-b62c-56f6511a7723&ntv_ht=8jVTaQA) - [National Parks](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/national-parks/) - [Examining Tax Reform](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/taxreform) - [Fix TSCA](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/fixtsca) - [Inside the Corn Belt](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/sponsored/?as-farmers-grow-america-thrives&ntv_adpz=4125) - [Newsletters](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/newsletters) [Entertainment](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/news/entertainment/) # Feminist Frankenstein: Review of The Bride\! By [Peter Tonguette](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/author/peter-tonguette/) Published March 13, 2026 6:16am ET * [Add Washington Examiner on Google](https://www.google.com/preferences/source?q=washingtonexaminer.com) * ![Feminist Frankenstein: Review of The Bride\!](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/LA.Film_.031826.jpg) Christian Bale and Jessie Buckley in 'The Bride!' (Niko Tavenise/Warner Bros. Pictures) *** Maggie Gyllenhaal’s invigoratingly loopy new horror [comedy](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/comedy/) The Bride\! overcomes preachiness with sheer stylishness. Although she works overtime to wring [\#MeToo-ready](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/metoo/) self-righteousness from the classic she is remaking (James Whale’s 1935 monster movie Bride of Frankenstein), Gyllenhaal turns out to be far less adept at [feminist propaganda](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/feminism/) than she is at overseeing eye-catching photography and bracingly original sets, music, and costumes. That the [movie](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/movies-and-films/) succeeds in spite of itself is an encouragement in two ways: that aggressively off-kilter projects still have a route to the big screen, and that genuinely talented filmmakers, like Gyllenhaal, can get out of their own way. While most remakes either blatantly rehash their source material or blandly contemporize it, Gyllenhaal announces from the first frame that she has something different on tap: The film opens in black-and-white with Jessie Buckley as a spectral incarnation of Mary Shelley, the English author of the novel Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus. True to the film’s feminist orientation, this Shelley seems to have a chip on her shoulder: despite having written one of the widely agreed-upon masterpieces of the [horror](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/horror/) genre, she seems to feel that she never quite told the story she wanted to. It is in the actualization of that story — which, in reality, is entirely of Gyllenhaal’s own concoction — that the movie comes alive. In the movie’s fuzzy metaphysics, Shelley wills herself into the consciousness of a character named Ida (also played by Buckley), a young woman angling for survival in 1930s [Chicago](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/chicago/) — a colorful, dangerous world of bawdy lotharios and lethal gangsters. The gambit that Shelley somehow comes to possess her fictional creation is sustained, as Ida alternates between a very American dialect and a more high-toned British accent. This, not her work in Hamnet (2025), is the part Buckley ought to be [Oscar-nominated](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/oscars/) for. # Recommended Stories [![‘Meathead bros’ and ‘pink-haired weirdos’ in agreement on antisemitism: Bill Maher](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/billmaher-e1775925132253.png?w=150&h=150&crop=1) ‘Meathead bros’ and ‘pink-haired weirdos’ in agreement on antisemitism: Bill Maher](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/entertainment/4525499/meathead-bros-pink-haired-weirdos-antisemitism/?itm_source=parsely-api) [![Fox’s Maria Bartiromo honored with prestigious award](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/horatio1-rotated-e1775922535752.jpeg?w=150&h=150&crop=1) Fox’s Maria Bartiromo honored with prestigious award](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/entertainment/4525381/fox-maria-bartiromo-honored-with-prestigious-award/?itm_source=parsely-api) [![Tim Burchett to Stephen A. Smith on UFO sightings: ‘It’s not Independence Day’](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/SmithBurchett-e1775850249710.png?w=150&h=150&crop=1) Tim Burchett to Stephen A. Smith on UFO sightings: ‘It’s not Independence Day’](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/entertainment/4524824/tim-burchett-ufo-sightings-its-not-independence-day-stephen-a-smith/?itm_source=parsely-api) No less imaginative is the importation of the story from [Europe](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/europe/) to midcentury America. This allows the film to include among its sights rollicking nightclubs, decadent parties, and grand movie palaces, though Gyllenhaal intentionally incorporates elements that are not appropriate to the ’30s setting: one scene shows moviegoers transfixed by 3D, a technology that did not attain ubiquity until a decade or so later. Yet the film’s freewheeling maximalism is one of its greatest pleasures: Gyllenhaal pours into her blender not only time periods, but tones, acting styles, and genres. ![Christian Bale and Jessie Buckley in 'The Bride!' (Niko Tavenise/Warner Bros. Pictures)](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/LA.Film_.031826.jpg?w=696) Christian Bale and Jessie Buckley in ‘The Bride!’ (Niko Tavenise/Warner Bros. Pictures) The Bride\! begins fast and furiously when Ida runs afoul of a Chicago Mafioso called Lupino (Zlatko Buric) — the film’s depiction of the mob has something of the farcical, frenetic quality of Some Like It Hot (1959). Ida meets her end after being pushed down a flight of stairs. In a movie where the violence is quick but intense, her head is slammed, and her limbs become mangled, but since this is a derivation of the Frankenstein series, we know that she only appears to be among the dead. Enter Christian Bale, who plays Frank — the once-deceased creature reconstituted by an unseen Dr. Frankenstein — in the long and honorable tradition of hulking but strangely sweet depictions of the monster. Bale is at times as menacing as Boris Karloff in the original monster movies, and he is often as funny as Peter Boyle in Mel Brooks’s Young Frankenstein (1974), but to these performances, he adds a particularly plangent naivete. It’s one of Bale’s most sensitive performances, strange though as it sounds to say. To evade detection, or out of simple self-consciousness about his appearance, Frank loses himself in the dark of the movies. He is a devotee of a supercilious star of frothy black-and-white comedy-musicals, Ronnie Reed (Jake Gyllenhaal, the filmmaker’s brother). His knowledge of classic cinema is encyclopedic, and only the stone-hearted could not laugh at Bale’s accent, which renders “Ginger” (as in Ginger Rogers) as “Gingah.” Despite the solace he takes in the silver screen, though, this Frank is afflicted with the same condition as all previous film Frankensteins: the dull, persistent pain of loneliness. He prevails upon Dr. Euphronious (Annette Bening) to excavate a deceased female, revivify her with the aid of electricity, and anoint her his wife, or wife-to-be, or something similar. This is within the powers of Dr. Euphronious, who represents one of the film’s most striking continuities with Bride of Frankenstein in her mad-scientist-like eccentricity. Ida thus becomes Frank’s bride, helpmeet, helpmate, lady, and/or wife — to name the litany of titles with which she identifies herself. Undoubtedly, Maggie Gyllenhaal means Frank’s resuscitation of Ida to represent a further exploitation of a heroine who, undeniably, received rough treatment during her actual pre-undead state. Certainly, Gyllenhaal intends for Ida’s identification of herself as a “bride” or “helpmeet” to be ironic. Yet the film is susceptible to the appeal of its leads: simply put, we want Frank and the Bride to be a couple, especially after they are compelled to evade law enforcement midway through. Plus, the movie is simply too goofy and good-natured for any of its feminist agitation to land. One passage depicts the Bonnie-and-Clyde-like notoriety of Frank and the Bride, leading ordinary women to adopt her wild hairdo and goth makeup (including what are evidently meant to be burns on her mouth and tongue from all that electricity). But it’s not at all clear that the women imitating the Bride are doing so because they are future Betty Friedan acolytes or merely because the Bride looks cool. I think it’s the latter. [FILM — NIGHTMARISH CRINGE: A REVIEW OF ‘DREAMS’](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/premium/4477862/review-dreams-movie/) Gyllenhaal would have been wise to drop any sociopolitical notions she had about the story and instead embrace it as an opportunity for extravagant weirdness, for which she has a gift. In one extraordinary sequence, Frank comes into contact with his hero, the movie star Ronnie Reed, and after a less-than-satisfactory interaction, he expresses his feelings by dancing like a man possessed to “Puttin’ on the Ritz.” Yes, it’s a direct lift from Young Frankenstein, but as staged by Gyllenhaal, it becomes a mass dance number in which the Bride and dozens of others join Frank as though they are incapable of not moving to the music. It’s a bit like the “Day-O” scene in Beetlejuice (1988). And, playing a detective and his secretary attempting to ascertain the Bride’s whereabouts, Peter Sarsgaard and Penelope Cruz have just the right note of offhand oddness that suggests neither is taking the movie too seriously. Audiences alert to signs of creeping wokeness will find plenty of irritants throughout The Bride\!, but those willing to separate the wheat from the chaff will find, underneath Gyllenhaal’s failed messaging, a movie of considerable creativity. An indie actress to remember in films like Donnie Darko (2001), Adaptation (2002), and Crazy Heart (2009), Gyllenhaal made her directorial debut in 2021 with The Lost Daughter. That small-scale drama was a world away from the extravagances of The Bride\!, but when I interviewed the actress-turned filmmaker for a magazine piece back then, I took note of her appreciative references to adventuresome directors like Nicolas Roeg and to profoundly odd and unnerving movies like Roman Polanski’s The Tenant (1976). Despite some of her solemn intentions, with The Bride\!, she has delivered a film worthy of those bizarro predecessors. Peter Tonguette is the film critic for the Washington Examiner magazine. * ### Tag: [Comedy](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/comedy/) [Culture](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/culture/) [Entertainment](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/entertainment/) [Feminism](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/feminism/) [Hollywood](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/hollywood/) [Horror](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/horror/) [Magazine - Life & Arts](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/magazine-life-arts/) [Movies and Films](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/movies-and-films/) * # Magazine [![Magazine Covers](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/C1_WSX041526.jpg?w=696)](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/magazine/) [Subscribe](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/subscribe/digital/) [The government union sinkhole: Public-sector unions are making blue states ungovernable](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/premium/4520071/public-sector-unions-making-blue-states-ungovernable/) [Can the Democrats get religion?](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/premium/4522816/can-democrats-get-religion/) [Kash Patel and Sen. David McCormick team up to fight fentanyl in Pennsylvania](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/premium/4521281/fighting-fentanyl-pennsylvania/) # [More from Entertainment](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/news/entertainment/) [![‘Meathead bros’ and ‘pink-haired weirdos’ in agreement on antisemitism: Bill Maher ](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/billmaher-e1775925132253.png?w=300) ‘Meathead bros’ and ‘pink-haired weirdos’ in agreement on antisemitism: Bill Maher](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/entertainment/4525499/meathead-bros-pink-haired-weirdos-antisemitism/) * [![Fox’s Maria Bartiromo honored with prestigious award](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/horatio1-rotated-e1775922535752.jpeg?w=225) Fox’s Maria Bartiromo honored with prestigious award](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/entertainment/4525381/fox-maria-bartiromo-honored-with-prestigious-award/) * [![Tim Burchett to Stephen A. Smith on UFO sightings: ‘It’s not Independence Day’](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/SmithBurchett-e1775850249710.png?w=300) Tim Burchett to Stephen A. Smith on UFO sightings: ‘It’s not Independence Day’](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/entertainment/4524824/tim-burchett-ufo-sightings-its-not-independence-day-stephen-a-smith/) * [![Tucker Carlson sells Trump’s MAGA-dividing namecalling with new merch: ‘Low IQ’](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/AP26063078726684.jpg?w=300) Tucker Carlson sells Trump’s MAGA-dividing namecalling with new merch: ‘Low IQ’](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/entertainment/4524598/tucker-carlson-sell-low-iq-merch/) * [![Democrats’ criticism of Iran is ‘so phony’: Joe Concha](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/trumpiranphony.jpg?w=300) Democrats’ criticism of Iran is ‘so phony’: Joe Concha](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/entertainment/4524249/democrats-criticism-iran-so-phony-joe-concha/) * Gas Tracker Updated Daily Today's National Average \$4\.14 \-\$0.02 Price per gallon of regular unleaded in the U.S. Change since Apr. 11, 2026 · Source: [AAA](https://gasprices.aaa.com/) # TRENDING NOW [![The surprisingly triumphant return of ‘The Naked Gun’](https://images.parsely.com/_wBPpjyudHfd7frNkpXobza3XA0=/85x85/smart/https%3A//www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/LA.Film_.081325-150x150.webp) The surprisingly triumphant return of ‘The Naked Gun’](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/premium/3491183/the-naked-gun-movie-police-humor-summer-2020-protests-george-floyd/?itm_source=parsely-api) * [![The surprisingly triumphant return of ‘The Naked Gun’](https://images.parsely.com/x7MQAQk8P1pmpjS3mUbSQiFN7Yc=/85x85/smart/https%3A//www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/LA.Film_.081325.webp%3Fw%3D150%26h%3D150%26crop%3D1) The surprisingly triumphant return of ‘The Naked Gun’](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/3491183/the-naked-gun-movie-police-humor-summer-2020-protests-george-floyd/?itm_source=parsely-api) * [![An undivided Kill Bill demands your undivided attention](https://images.parsely.com/LTVbzL76tNQjb_LTZWpZKEpnXEY=/85x85/smart/https%3A//www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/LA.OnCulture.122425.jpg%3Fw%3D150%26h%3D150%26crop%3D1) An undivided Kill Bill demands your undivided attention](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/premium/3917546/kill-bill-the-whole-bloody-affair-demands-undivided-attention/?itm_source=parsely-api) * [![Oscars 2026](https://images.parsely.com/UJ_eUk7534j646zG2BjHqusSvu0=/85x85/smart/https%3A//www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/LA.Film_.Oscars.032526.jpg%3Fw%3D150%26h%3D150%26crop%3D1) Oscars 2026](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/premium/4496795/oscars-2026-revi/?itm_source=parsely-api) * [![When ‘The Shining’ was overlooked](https://images.parsely.com/dv30kJrNUiNrTsc6Oic-t7uuVF8=/85x85/smart/https%3A//www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/AP18121036514171.jpg%3Fw%3D150%26h%3D150%26crop%3D1) When ‘The Shining’ was overlooked](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/3416298/stanley-kubricks-the-shining-book/?itm_source=parsely-api) * [![Logo](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/2023-Examiner-logo-white-color-eagle-1-1.png)Washington Examiner](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ "Washington Examiner") [Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information]() [Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/WashingtonExaminer/ "Facebook") [Twitter](https://twitter.com/DCExaminer "Twitter") [Youtube](https://www.youtube.com/@washingtonexaminer "Youtube") ## NEWS - [Politics](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/politics/) - [White House](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/news/white-house/) - [Senate](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/senate/) - [House](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/news/house/) - [Campaigns](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/news/campaigns/) - [Business](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/news/business/) - [World](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/world/) - [Investigations](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/Investigations/) - [Justice](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/news/justice/) - [Supreme Court](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/supreme-court/) - [Crime](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/news/crime/) - [Washington Secrets](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/news/washington-secrets/) - [Entertainment](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/entertainment/) - [Sports](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/sports/) ## POLICY - [Defense](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/policy/defense/) - [National Security](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/policy/national-security/) - [Energy](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/policy/energy/) - [Immigration](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/policy/immigration/) - [Finance and Economy](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/policy/finance-and-economy/) - [Healthcare](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/policy/healthcare/) - [Foreign Policy](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/policy/foreign-policy/) - [Tech](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/policy/technology/) - [Infrastructure](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/policy/infrastructure/) - [Space](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/policy/space/) ## COMMENTARY - [Columnists](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/opinion/columnists/) - [Editorials](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/opinion/editorials/) - [Think Tanks](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/think-tanks/) - [Beltway Confidential](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/opinion/beltway-confidential/) - [Op-Eds](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/op-eds/) ## RESTORING AMERICA - [Patriotism and Unity](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/restoring-america/patriotism-unity/) - [Faith, Freedom, and Self-Reliance](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/restoring-america/faith-freedom-self-reliance/) - [Courage, Strength, and Optimism](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/restoring-america/courage-strength-optimism/) - [Equality, Not Elitism](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/restoring-america/equality-not-elitism/) - [Community and Family](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/restoring-america/community-family/) - [Fairness and Justice](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/restoring-america/fairness-justice/) - [Mission](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/about-restoring-america/) - [WATCH](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/watch/) - [IN FOCUS](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/section/in_focus/) - [NEWSLETTERS](https://newsletters.washingtonexaminer.com/) - [MAGAZINE ARCHIVE](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/editions) - [Policies and Standards](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policies-and-standards) - [Terms Of Service](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/terms) - [Subscription Terms of Use](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/subscription-agreement) - [Privacy Policy](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/privacy-policy) - [Your Privacy Choices](https://privacyportal.onetrust.com/webform/c7968fb5-dd42-4c76-8f79-3e5198bd1303/350db353-4891-4bd9-bc4d-2d772943bd13) - [Transparency In Coverage](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/transparency-in-coverage) - [Advertise](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/advertise) - [Subscribe](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/subscribe/digital/) - [Contact](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/contact/) - [Careers](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/careers) - [Staff](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/staff-2) - [About Examiner](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/about) - [Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/WashingtonExaminer/) - [Twitter](https://twitter.com/DCExaminer) - © Copyright 2026. Washington Examiner. All Rights Reserved.
Readable Markdown	Maggie Gyllenhaal’s invigoratingly loopy new horror [comedy](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/comedy/) The Bride\! overcomes preachiness with sheer stylishness. Although she works overtime to wring [\#MeToo-ready](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/metoo/) self-righteousness from the classic she is remaking (James Whale’s 1935 monster movie Bride of Frankenstein), Gyllenhaal turns out to be far less adept at [feminist propaganda](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/feminism/) than she is at overseeing eye-catching photography and bracingly original sets, music, and costumes. That the [movie](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/movies-and-films/) succeeds in spite of itself is an encouragement in two ways: that aggressively off-kilter projects still have a route to the big screen, and that genuinely talented filmmakers, like Gyllenhaal, can get out of their own way. While most remakes either blatantly rehash their source material or blandly contemporize it, Gyllenhaal announces from the first frame that she has something different on tap: The film opens in black-and-white with Jessie Buckley as a spectral incarnation of Mary Shelley, the English author of the novel Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus. True to the film’s feminist orientation, this Shelley seems to have a chip on her shoulder: despite having written one of the widely agreed-upon masterpieces of the [horror](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/horror/) genre, she seems to feel that she never quite told the story she wanted to. It is in the actualization of that story — which, in reality, is entirely of Gyllenhaal’s own concoction — that the movie comes alive. In the movie’s fuzzy metaphysics, Shelley wills herself into the consciousness of a character named Ida (also played by Buckley), a young woman angling for survival in 1930s [Chicago](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/chicago/) — a colorful, dangerous world of bawdy lotharios and lethal gangsters. The gambit that Shelley somehow comes to possess her fictional creation is sustained, as Ida alternates between a very American dialect and a more high-toned British accent. This, not her work in Hamnet (2025), is the part Buckley ought to be [Oscar-nominated](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/oscars/) for. No less imaginative is the importation of the story from [Europe](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tag/europe/) to midcentury America. This allows the film to include among its sights rollicking nightclubs, decadent parties, and grand movie palaces, though Gyllenhaal intentionally incorporates elements that are not appropriate to the ’30s setting: one scene shows moviegoers transfixed by 3D, a technology that did not attain ubiquity until a decade or so later. Yet the film’s freewheeling maximalism is one of its greatest pleasures: Gyllenhaal pours into her blender not only time periods, but tones, acting styles, and genres. ![Christian Bale and Jessie Buckley in 'The Bride!' (Niko Tavenise/Warner Bros. Pictures)](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/LA.Film_.031826.jpg?w=696) Christian Bale and Jessie Buckley in ‘The Bride!’ (Niko Tavenise/Warner Bros. Pictures) The Bride\! begins fast and furiously when Ida runs afoul of a Chicago Mafioso called Lupino (Zlatko Buric) — the film’s depiction of the mob has something of the farcical, frenetic quality of Some Like It Hot (1959). Ida meets her end after being pushed down a flight of stairs. In a movie where the violence is quick but intense, her head is slammed, and her limbs become mangled, but since this is a derivation of the Frankenstein series, we know that she only appears to be among the dead. Enter Christian Bale, who plays Frank — the once-deceased creature reconstituted by an unseen Dr. Frankenstein — in the long and honorable tradition of hulking but strangely sweet depictions of the monster. Bale is at times as menacing as Boris Karloff in the original monster movies, and he is often as funny as Peter Boyle in Mel Brooks’s Young Frankenstein (1974), but to these performances, he adds a particularly plangent naivete. It’s one of Bale’s most sensitive performances, strange though as it sounds to say. To evade detection, or out of simple self-consciousness about his appearance, Frank loses himself in the dark of the movies. He is a devotee of a supercilious star of frothy black-and-white comedy-musicals, Ronnie Reed (Jake Gyllenhaal, the filmmaker’s brother). His knowledge of classic cinema is encyclopedic, and only the stone-hearted could not laugh at Bale’s accent, which renders “Ginger” (as in Ginger Rogers) as “Gingah.” Despite the solace he takes in the silver screen, though, this Frank is afflicted with the same condition as all previous film Frankensteins: the dull, persistent pain of loneliness. He prevails upon Dr. Euphronious (Annette Bening) to excavate a deceased female, revivify her with the aid of electricity, and anoint her his wife, or wife-to-be, or something similar. This is within the powers of Dr. Euphronious, who represents one of the film’s most striking continuities with Bride of Frankenstein in her mad-scientist-like eccentricity. Ida thus becomes Frank’s bride, helpmeet, helpmate, lady, and/or wife — to name the litany of titles with which she identifies herself. Undoubtedly, Maggie Gyllenhaal means Frank’s resuscitation of Ida to represent a further exploitation of a heroine who, undeniably, received rough treatment during her actual pre-undead state. Certainly, Gyllenhaal intends for Ida’s identification of herself as a “bride” or “helpmeet” to be ironic. Yet the film is susceptible to the appeal of its leads: simply put, we want Frank and the Bride to be a couple, especially after they are compelled to evade law enforcement midway through. Plus, the movie is simply too goofy and good-natured for any of its feminist agitation to land. One passage depicts the Bonnie-and-Clyde-like notoriety of Frank and the Bride, leading ordinary women to adopt her wild hairdo and goth makeup (including what are evidently meant to be burns on her mouth and tongue from all that electricity). But it’s not at all clear that the women imitating the Bride are doing so because they are future Betty Friedan acolytes or merely because the Bride looks cool. I think it’s the latter. [FILM — NIGHTMARISH CRINGE: A REVIEW OF ‘DREAMS’](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/premium/4477862/review-dreams-movie/) Gyllenhaal would have been wise to drop any sociopolitical notions she had about the story and instead embrace it as an opportunity for extravagant weirdness, for which she has a gift. In one extraordinary sequence, Frank comes into contact with his hero, the movie star Ronnie Reed, and after a less-than-satisfactory interaction, he expresses his feelings by dancing like a man possessed to “Puttin’ on the Ritz.” Yes, it’s a direct lift from Young Frankenstein, but as staged by Gyllenhaal, it becomes a mass dance number in which the Bride and dozens of others join Frank as though they are incapable of not moving to the music. It’s a bit like the “Day-O” scene in Beetlejuice (1988). And, playing a detective and his secretary attempting to ascertain the Bride’s whereabouts, Peter Sarsgaard and Penelope Cruz have just the right note of offhand oddness that suggests neither is taking the movie too seriously. Audiences alert to signs of creeping wokeness will find plenty of irritants throughout The Bride\!, but those willing to separate the wheat from the chaff will find, underneath Gyllenhaal’s failed messaging, a movie of considerable creativity. An indie actress to remember in films like Donnie Darko (2001), Adaptation (2002), and Crazy Heart (2009), Gyllenhaal made her directorial debut in 2021 with The Lost Daughter. That small-scale drama was a world away from the extravagances of The Bride\!, but when I interviewed the actress-turned filmmaker for a magazine piece back then, I took note of her appreciative references to adventuresome directors like Nicolas Roeg and to profoundly odd and unnerving movies like Roman Polanski’s The Tenant (1976). Despite some of her solemn intentions, with The Bride\!, she has delivered a film worthy of those bizarro predecessors. Peter Tonguette is the film critic for the Washington Examiner magazine.
Shard	165 (laksa)
Root Hash	1167113907466770565
Unparsed URL	com,washingtonexaminer!www,/premium/4486158/film-feminist-frankenstein-review-the-bride/ s443