🕷️ Crawler Inspector

URL Lookup

Direct Parameter Lookup

Raw Queries and Responses

1. Shard Calculation

Query:

Response:

Calculated Shard: 137 (from laksa178)

2. Crawled Status Check

Query:

curl -X POST \
  'http://laksa137.int.ahrefs:8124/' \
  -H 'Content-Type: text/plain' \
  -H 'X-ClickHouse-Database: crawler3' \
  -H 'Authorization: Basic YXBpOg==' \
  -d 'SELECT getAhrefsURLFromUnparsed(src_unparsed) AS found_url, ifNull(toUnixTimestamp(download_stamp), 0) AS crawl_time, ifNull(toUnixTimestamp(props_url_first_seen), 0) AS first_indexed_time, download_http_code AS http_code, src_unparsed AS src_unparsed, src_root_hash AS src_root_hash, history_drop_reason AS history_drop_reason, meta_title AS meta_title, meta_descriptions AS meta_descriptions, attrs_boilerpipe_text AS attrs_boilerpipe_text, attrs_markdown AS attrs_markdown, attrs_readable_markdown AS attrs_readable_markdown, meta_canonical AS meta_canonical FROM crawler3.page_info_local FINAL PREWHERE (src_root_hash, src_unparsed) IN ((getAhrefsRootHashFromUnparsed(getAhrefsUnparsedNoserviceFromURL(\'https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they/\')), getAhrefsUnparsedNoserviceFromURL(\'https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they/\'))) FORMAT JSONEachRow'

Response:

{"found_url":"https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they\/","crawl_time":1776766305,"first_indexed_time":1738640081,"http_code":200,"src_unparsed":"eu,politico!www,\/article\/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they\/ s443","src_root_hash":"15364017793929463337","history_drop_reason":null,"meta_title":"Donald Trump says trade wars are easy to win. Is that true? – POLITICO","meta_descriptions":["How do tariffs actually work? How far will this conflict escalate? Can Europe escape? We answer all your burning questions."],"attrs_boilerpipe_text":"News\nTrade\nHow do tariffs actually work? How far will this conflict escalate? Can Europe escape? We answer all your burning questions.\nAI generated Text-to-speech\nCopy Link\nCopied\nShare via email\nShare on X\nShare on WhatsApp\nShare on LinkedIn\nFree article usually reserved for subscribers\nTrump affirme vouloir utiliser l’arme des droits de douane pour stopper le flux de fentanyl et de migrants illégaux aux frontières nord et sud des Etats-Unis. | Jim Watson\/AFP via Getty Images\nThis article is also available in:\nFrench\nFebruary 3, 2025\n7:50 pm CET\nBy\nDouglas Busvine\nBERLIN — Donald Trump makes light of trade wars, claiming they are\neasy to win\n. We’re about to find out if he’s right.\nThe U.S. president has imposed tariffs of 10 percent on China from Tuesday, while Mexico and Canada won\nlast-minute stays of execution\non 25 percent tariffs. He’s also threatening to\nhit the European Union\n— a major exporter of cars, medicines and food to the United States.\nTrump says he wants to use the tariff weapon to halt the flow of fentanyl and illegal migrants across the northern and southern borders of the United States. To do so he has invoked emergency powers — even though the U.S. economy is growing strongly and is at full employment.\nAdvertisement\nHe also wants to close the $1 trillion U.S. trade deficit with the rest of the world. Team Trump argues that\nthrowing up a tariff wall\nwill force companies to move investment and jobs back to the U.S. — think of all those silicon chips now made in Taiwan or iPhones made in China.\nBut critics warn that Trump’s trade war will\nresult in higher prices\n, lower growth, lost jobs and disrupted supply chains — both at home and abroad. They also argue that tariffs are the wrong tool to fix a trade deficit caused by America’s borrowing and consumption habits.\nHere’s what Trump’s trade war is all about:\nWhat’s a trade war?\nFirst up, a trade war isn’t an actual war: It’s a conflict that results when one side feels that a trading relationship is unfair. Let’s say you flood my market with cheap steel, at prices below the cost of production. Companies in my country are going to the wall. They are laying off workers. My voters. That’s dumping and, under the rules of global trade, I can retaliate by imposing tariffs on your steel.\nFor a trade conflict like this to turn into a trade war, things need to escalate. And that’s what is happening here: Trump is still threatening to hit America’s closest trading partners with tariffs on pretty much everything. That means we could be about to embark on the biggest trade war since the 1930s.\nHow do tariffs work?\nTrump claims that his new tariffs will make Americans rich — he’s even promised to set up a new\nExternal Revenue Service\nto collect all the revenues that they throw off. He also says foreign companies will pay them and that they won’t hurt U.S. consumers.\nAdvertisement\nThat’s not how they work, however. Tariffs are a tax that is paid by the importer at the border. If they go up, the importer faces a choice — to pass on the price increase to the consumer, or to accept a squeeze on their profit margins.\nPrice increases from Trump’s across-the-board tariffs would show up immediately in consumer inflation, economists say. And although he has promised to offset their impact with tax cuts elsewhere, there is no sign of that happening yet.\nAs for the potential revenue from tariffs, Trump likes to\nhark back to the late 19th century\n, when tariffs accounted for over half of U.S. federal revenues. But that was before income tax — which today supports a government much larger in relation to the overall economy. There is just no way that tariff revenues can pay for a modern state.\nWhen was the last trade war?\nIn\nTrump’s first term\n. He imposed 25 percent duties on steel and 10 percent on aluminum in 2018 — while the European Union responded by slapping $6 billion in tariffs on Harley Davidson motorbikes, Levi’s jeans and bourbon.\nTrump threatened to escalate by hitting imports of European cars — but\nit never came to that\n. Eventually, the tariffs were suspended by both sides. The EU\ntruce expires\nat the end of March, meaning that even if Trump doesn’t hit Europe with tariffs now, their trade dispute could still get out of hand.\nThe clearest precedent is likely the so-called Nixon shock of 1971. The starting point was comparable to today: The costs of the Vietnam War and of the Great Society policies of the 1960s had tipped the United States from surplus into deficit.\nAdvertisement\nIn an attempt to restore the balance, President Richard Nixon abolished the gold standard — forcing the trading partners of the U.S. to revalue their currencies. He ordered a 90-day freeze on wages and prices. And he imposed a 10 percent import tax.\nNixon’s actions are considered to have been a political success but an economic failure. The import tax was scrapped within months. And the U.S. economy struggled for years with stagflation — a combination of low growth and high inflation — that was only squeezed out of the system in the 1980s by Federal Reserve Chair Paul Volcker’s tough monetary policies.\nWho is the real enemy?\nChina. Although Trump has only threatened to hit China with tariffs of 10 percent, the tariffs still hanging over Canada and Mexico are indirectly aimed at Beijing.\nThat’s because, under the USMCA trade accord (the successor to NAFTA), Chinese companies — e.g. makers of electric vehicles — would normally enjoy duty-free access to the U.S. market if they locate production in North America.\nIn recent years there has been bipartisan consensus in Washington on the need to fight back against China and its economic model, which has created vast industrial overcapacity and has flooded world markets with surplus production. Since taking office, however, Trump has dialed back the rhetoric, saying he just wants a “fair” trading relationship with China.\nOne thing to watch: Will Trump drop the tariffs against America’s allies if\nthey agree to align with the United States\nin shutting out China? That’s one straw\nthe European Union is clutching at\nin the hope of keeping the transatlantic peace.\nAdvertisement\nHow far can this escalate?\nTrump, in his second incarnation as U.S. president, has shown no inhibitions in questioning the territorial integrity of other nations — jibing that Canada\nshould become the 51st U.S. state\nor\nstaking a claim to Greenland\n, a protectorate of EU member Denmark.\nA greater concern is that, in playing fast and loose with international law, Trump is playing into the hands of leaders — like Russia’s Vladimir Putin — who want to overturn the status quo. In a world where multiple fires are burning, Trump is liberally splashing gasoline and tossing matches to start new ones.\nCan Europe escape Trump’s wrath?\nThe U.S. president has been amping up his rhetoric, on Sunday night\ncalling the EU an “atrocity.\n” Brussels is desperate to engage, offering to buy more U.S.\nliquefied natural gas\nor\nweapons\nas Trump presses European governments to spend more on defense.\nLast time, Brussels answered Trump’s steel and aluminum tariffs by retaliating against motorbikes, jeans and bourbon — measures targeted to cause maximum pain in Republican strongholds. \nThe EU could do the same again — or\nwield its trade “bazooka,”\nthe anti-coercion instrument, which would put retaliation on a stronger legal footing. Experts worry, though, that the anti-coercion instrument may be too slow, because it foresees a period of consultation before action. The EU needs a new, bigger bazooka that can be fired in real time, they argue.\nCan Trump be stopped?\nTrump is, for the first time, invoking emergency powers under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), so far only used by Joe Biden to impose sanctions against Russia over Putin’s war against Ukraine. \nAdvertisement\nThe IEEPA\nhasn’t yet been used to justify tariffs\n— and it’s possible that business groups which suffer financial injury as a result will take legal action. It’s unlikely, however, that a judge would issue an immediate injunction against the tariffs. Any litigation would likely be drawn out.\nThe U.S. Congress might also have the power to halt Trump’s trade war. On top of the doubtful justification that fentanyl and illegal immigration represent an economic emergency, the legislature has also delegated broad responsibility for trade policy to the president — it first did so to Franklin D. Roosevelt back in 1934 — and can take it back.\nBut with both the Senate and the House of Representatives under Republican control, a major rift would have to open up on trade to stop him in his tracks. And that looks unlikely right now.\nThen there’s the World Trade Organization — a global body created 30 years ago to act as an umpire in trade disputes.\nIt’s currently unable to fulfil that role\n, however, after both Trump and Biden blocked the appointment of judges to its Appellate Body, or highest court of appeal.\nThe bottom line\nFor Trump there are no rules. It’s the law of the jungle out there. So unless there is a strong political or judicial backlash in the United States against his trade war, he will be hard to stop. \nThen again, he might just do a deal.\nThis story has been updated.\nAdvertisement","attrs_markdown":"![](https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/tr?id=394368290733607&ev=PageView&noscript=1)\n\n[Skip to main content](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they\/#main)\n\nAdvertisement\n\nMenu\n\nEdition: Europe\n\n- [Europe](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/?no-geo-redirect)\n- [UK](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/uk\/)\n- [France](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/france-politics-news\/)\n- [Germany](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/german-politics\/)\n- [US](https:\/\/www.politico.com\/)\n\n- - [Policy areas](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they\/)\n    - [Agriculture and Food](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/agriculture\/)\n    - [Central Banker](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/central-banker\/)\n    - [Competition and Industrial Policy](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/competition\/)\n    - [Cybersecurity and Data Protection](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/cybersecurity\/)\n    - [Defense](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/defense\/)\n    - [Energy and Climate](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/energy\/)\n    - [Energy and Climate UK](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/energy-uk\/)\n    - [Energie et Climat France](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/energy-fr\/)\n    - [Energie & Klima DE](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/politico-pro-energie-klima-am-morgen-newsletter-trial\/)\n    - [Financial Services](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/financial-services\/)\n    - [Financial Services UK](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/financial-services-uk\/)\n    - [Gesundheit](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/politico-pro-gesundheit-newsletter-trial\/)\n    - [Health Care](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/health-care\/)\n    - [Industrie & Handel DE](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/industrie-handel\/)\n    - [Mobility](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/mobility\/)\n    - [Paris Influence](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/paris-influence\/)\n    - [Sustainability](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/sustainability\/)\n    - [Technology](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/technology\/)\n    - [Tech France](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/technology-fr\/)\n    - [Technologie & KI](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/politico-pro-technologie-newsletter-trial\/)\n    - [Technology UK](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/technology-uk\/)\n    - [Trade](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/trade\/)\n    - [Trade UK](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/trade-uk\/)\n- - [Newsletters](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/newsletter\/)\n    - [Berlin Bulletin](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/newsletter\/berlin-bulletin\/)\n    - [Berlin Playbook](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/newsletter\/berlin-playbook)\n    - [Brussels Playbook](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/newsletter\/brussels-playbook\/)\n    - [Dimanchissime](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/newsletter\/dimanchissime\/)\n    - [EU Influence](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/newsletter\/politico-eu-influence\/)\n    - [Forecast](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/newsletter\/forecast\/)\n    - [Global Playbook](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/newsletter\/global-playbook\/)\n    - [Global Policy Lab: Living Cities](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/livingcities\/)\n    - [Global Security](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/newsletter\/global-security\/)\n    - [Le Weekly](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/newsletter\/le-weekly\/)\n    - [London Influence](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/newsletter\/politico-london-influence\/)\n    - [London Playbook](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/newsletter\/london-playbook\/)\n    - [Playbook Paris](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/newsletter\/playbook-paris\/)\n    - [POLITICO Confidential](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/newsletter\/politico-confidential\/)\n    - [Sunday Crunch](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/newsletter\/sunday-crunch\/)\n- - [Podcasts](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/podcast\/)\n    - [Brussels Playbook Podcast](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/podcast\/brussels-playbook-podcast\/)\n    - [Westminster Insider](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/podcast\/westminster-insider\/)\n    - [Politics at Sam and Anne's](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/podcast\/politics-at-jack-and-sams\/)\n    - [Berlin Playbook — Der Podcast](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/podcast\/berlin-playbook-podcast\/)\n    - [Power & Policy](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/podcast\/power-and-policy\/)\n    - [Inside AfD](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/podcast\/inside-afd\/)\n  - [Opinion](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they\/)\n    - [All Opinion](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/opinion\/)\n    - [Beyond the Bubble](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/beyond-the-bubble\/)\n    - [Germany Interpreted](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/germany-interpreted\/)\n    - [Declassified](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/declassified\/)\n    - [From Across the Pond](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/from-across-the-pond\/)\n    - [Unpacked](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/unpacked\/)\n- - [Featured Series](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they\/)\n    - [Danish Presidency of the EU](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/special-report\/danish-presidency-of-the-eu-special-report\/)\n    - [Europe’s looming water crisis](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/europe-water-crisis-resilience-strategy-eu-commission\/)\n    - [Breaking out: Stories of Roma empowerment](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/politico-special-report-breaking-out-roma-community-europe-empowerment\/)\n    - [COP30](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/cop30-latest-news-united-nations-climate-summit\/)\n    - [A global emergency: Tackling antimicrobial resistance](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/health-care-special-report-global-emergency-amr-antimicrobial-resistance\/)\n    - [Living Cities](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/livingcities\/)\n    - [POLITICO 28](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/politico-28-class-of-2026\/)\n  - [Poll of polls](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they\/)\n    - [Elections in Europe](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/europe-poll-of-polls\/)\n    - [European Parliament election](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/europe-poll-of-polls\/european-parliament-election\/)\n  - [Politico Live](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they\/)\n    - [See All Future Events](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/events\/future-events\/)\n    - [About our events](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/about-politico-events\/)\n- - [Apps](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they\/)\n    - [Apple Store](https:\/\/apps.apple.com\/be\/app\/politico-pro-europe\/id1396447664)\n    - [Google Play Store](https:\/\/play.google.com\/store\/apps\/details?id=eu.politico.promobile&hl=en_UK)\n  - [More Info](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they\/)\n    - [About us](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/about-us\/)\n    - [Media Solutions](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/media-solutions\/)\n    - [POLITICO Studio](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/politico-studio\/)\n    - [Press](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/press\/)\n    - [Print Edition](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/politico-print-edition\/)\n    - [Contact Us](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/contact-us\/)\n    - [Careers at POLITICO](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/careers\/)\n\n[POLITICO Pro](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/pro\/)\n\nEurope\n\n- [Europe](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/?no-geo-redirect)\n- [UK](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/uk\/)\n- [France](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/france-politics-news\/)\n- [Germany](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/german-politics\/)\n- [US](https:\/\/www.politico.com\/)\n\n[Log In](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/login\/)\n\n[POLITICO Pro](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/pro\/)\n\n- [Home](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/)\n- [Latest news](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/latest\/)\n- [War in Iran](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/war-in-iran\/)\n- [Energy crisis](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/energy-crisis\/)\n- [War in Ukraine](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/war-in-ukraine\/)\n- [Newsletters](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/newsletter\/)\n- [Podcasts](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/podcast\/)\n- [Poll of Polls](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/europe-poll-of-polls)\n- [Policy news](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/policy\/)\n- [Events](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/events\/future-events\/)\n\n1. [News](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/news)\n2. [Trade](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/trade\/)\n\n# Donald Trump says trade wars are easy to win. Is that true?\nHow do tariffs actually work? How far will this conflict escalate? Can Europe escape? We answer all your burning questions.\n\nListen\n\nAI generated Text-to-speech\n\n- [Copy Link Copied](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they\/ \"Copy Link\")\n- [Share via email](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/cdn-cgi\/l\/email-protection#625d000d061b5f0a161612114751234750244750241515154c120d0e0b160b010d4c07174750240310160b010e07475024060d0c030e064f1610170f124f11031b114f16100306074f150310114f0310074f0703111b4f160d4f150b0c4f0310074f160a071b475024444152515a59111700080701165f260d0c030e064750523610170f1247505211031b114750521610030607475052150310114750520310074750520703111b475052160d475052150b0c4c4750522b11475052160a031647505216101707475124 \"EMail\")\n- [Share on X](https:\/\/x.com\/intent\/post\/?url=https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they\/&text=Donald%20Trump%20says%20trade%20wars%20are%20easy%20to%20win.%20Is%20that%20true%3F \"X\")\n- [Share on WhatsApp](https:\/\/api.whatsapp.com\/send?text=Donald%20Trump%20says%20trade%20wars%20are%20easy%20to%20win.%20Is%20that%20true%3F%20https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they\/ \"WhatsApp\")\n- [Share on LinkedIn](https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/sharing\/share-offsite\/?url=https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they\/&title=Donald%20Trump%20says%20trade%20wars%20are%20easy%20to%20win.%20Is%20that%20true%3F&summary=Donald%20Trump%20says%20trade%20wars%20are%20easy%20to%20win.%20Is%20that%20true%3F&source=https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they\/ \"Linkedin\")\n\n[Free article usually reserved for subscribers](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/pro\/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they\/)\n\n![US-POLITICS-TRUMP-WEALTH-FUND](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/cdn-cgi\/image\/width=1160,height=773,quality=80,onerror=redirect,format=auto\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/03\/trump-scaled.jpg)\n\nTrump affirme vouloir utiliser l’arme des droits de douane pour stopper le flux de fentanyl et de migrants illégaux aux frontières nord et sud des Etats-Unis. \\| Jim Watson\/AFP via Getty Images\n\nThis article is also available in: [French](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/les-guerres-commerciales-sont-elles-si-faciles-a-gagner-comme-laffirme-trump\/)\n\nFebruary 3, 2025   7:50 pm CET\n\nBy  [Douglas Busvine](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/author\/doug-busvine\/)\n\nBERLIN — Donald Trump makes light of trade wars, claiming they are [easy to win](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/donald-trump-trade-wars-are-good\/). We’re about to find out if he’s right.\n\nThe U.S. president has imposed tariffs of 10 percent on China from Tuesday, while Mexico and Canada won [last-minute stays of execution](https:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/2025\/02\/03\/canada-tarriff-paused-trudeau-trump-00202212) on 25 percent tariffs. He’s also threatening to [hit the European Union](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/donald-trump-trade-war-eu-tariffs-mexico-canada\/) — a major exporter of cars, medicines and food to the United States.\n\nTrump says he wants to use the tariff weapon to halt the flow of fentanyl and illegal migrants across the northern and southern borders of the United States. To do so he has invoked emergency powers — even though the U.S. economy is growing strongly and is at full employment.\n\nAdvertisement\n\nAdvertisement\n\nHe also wants to close the \\$1 trillion U.S. trade deficit with the rest of the world. Team Trump argues that [throwing up a tariff wall](https:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/2024\/11\/12\/lighthizer-trump-new-tariff-plan-00189114) will force companies to move investment and jobs back to the U.S. — think of all those silicon chips now made in Taiwan or iPhones made in China.\n\nBut critics warn that Trump’s trade war will [result in higher prices](https:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/2025\/02\/02\/summers-tariffs-self-inflicted-wound-american-economy-00201978), lower growth, lost jobs and disrupted supply chains — both at home and abroad. They also argue that tariffs are the wrong tool to fix a trade deficit caused by America’s borrowing and consumption habits.\n\nHere’s what Trump’s trade war is all about:\n\n### **What’s a trade war?**\nFirst up, a trade war isn’t an actual war: It’s a conflict that results when one side feels that a trading relationship is unfair. Let’s say you flood my market with cheap steel, at prices below the cost of production. Companies in my country are going to the wall. They are laying off workers. My voters. That’s dumping and, under the rules of global trade, I can retaliate by imposing tariffs on your steel.\n\nFor a trade conflict like this to turn into a trade war, things need to escalate. And that’s what is happening here: Trump is still threatening to hit America’s closest trading partners with tariffs on pretty much everything. That means we could be about to embark on the biggest trade war since the 1930s.\n\n### **How do tariffs work?**\nTrump claims that his new tariffs will make Americans rich — he’s even promised to set up a new [External Revenue Service](https:\/\/www.politico.com\/live-updates\/2025\/01\/14\/congress\/trump-to-create-external-revenue-service-for-tariffs-00198155) to collect all the revenues that they throw off. He also says foreign companies will pay them and that they won’t hurt U.S. consumers.\n\nAdvertisement\n\nAdvertisement\n\nThat’s not how they work, however. Tariffs are a tax that is paid by the importer at the border. If they go up, the importer faces a choice — to pass on the price increase to the consumer, or to accept a squeeze on their profit margins.\n\nPrice increases from Trump’s across-the-board tariffs would show up immediately in consumer inflation, economists say. And although he has promised to offset their impact with tax cuts elsewhere, there is no sign of that happening yet.\n\nAs for the potential revenue from tariffs, Trump likes to [hark back to the late 19th century](https:\/\/truthsocial.com\/@realDonaldTrump\/posts\/113755116467958801), when tariffs accounted for over half of U.S. federal revenues. But that was before income tax — which today supports a government much larger in relation to the overall economy. There is just no way that tariff revenues can pay for a modern state.\n\n### **When was the last trade war?**\nIn [Trump’s first term](https:\/\/www.politico.com\/story\/2018\/03\/01\/trump-steel-tariffs-432143). He imposed 25 percent duties on steel and 10 percent on aluminum in 2018 — while the European Union responded by slapping \\$6 billion in tariffs on Harley Davidson motorbikes, Levi’s jeans and bourbon.\n\nTrump threatened to escalate by hitting imports of European cars — but [it never came to that](https:\/\/www.politico.com\/story\/2018\/07\/19\/trump-auto-tariff-commerce-hearing-698100). Eventually, the tariffs were suspended by both sides. The EU [truce expires](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/brussels-to-announce-us-tariffs-truce-monday\/) at the end of March, meaning that even if Trump doesn’t hit Europe with tariffs now, their trade dispute could still get out of hand.\n\nThe clearest precedent is likely the so-called Nixon shock of 1971. The starting point was comparable to today: The costs of the Vietnam War and of the Great Society policies of the 1960s had tipped the United States from surplus into deficit.\n\nAdvertisement\n\nAdvertisement\n\nIn an attempt to restore the balance, President Richard Nixon abolished the gold standard — forcing the trading partners of the U.S. to revalue their currencies. He ordered a 90-day freeze on wages and prices. And he imposed a 10 percent import tax.\n\nNixon’s actions are considered to have been a political success but an economic failure. The import tax was scrapped within months. And the U.S. economy struggled for years with stagflation — a combination of low growth and high inflation — that was only squeezed out of the system in the 1980s by Federal Reserve Chair Paul Volcker’s tough monetary policies.\n\n### **Who is the real enemy?**\nChina. Although Trump has only threatened to hit China with tariffs of 10 percent, the tariffs still hanging over Canada and Mexico are indirectly aimed at Beijing.\n\nThat’s because, under the USMCA trade accord (the successor to NAFTA), Chinese companies — e.g. makers of electric vehicles — would normally enjoy duty-free access to the U.S. market if they locate production in North America.\n\nIn recent years there has been bipartisan consensus in Washington on the need to fight back against China and its economic model, which has created vast industrial overcapacity and has flooded world markets with surplus production. Since taking office, however, Trump has dialed back the rhetoric, saying he just wants a “fair” trading relationship with China.\n\nOne thing to watch: Will Trump drop the tariffs against America’s allies if [they agree to align with the United States](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/fear-and-loathing-in-davos-eu-frets-about-its-lose-lose-choice-between-trumps-us-and-xis-china\/) in shutting out China? That’s one straw [the European Union is clutching at](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/eu-donald-turmp-maros-sefcovic-ursula-von-der-leyen-lets-deal\/) in the hope of keeping the transatlantic peace.\n\nAdvertisement\n\nAdvertisement\n\n### **How far can this escalate?**\nTrump, in his second incarnation as U.S. president, has shown no inhibitions in questioning the territorial integrity of other nations — jibing that Canada [should become the 51st U.S. state](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/us-donald-trump-says-great-idea-to-make-canada-the-51st-state-justin-trudeau\/) or [staking a claim to Greenland](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/us-donald-trump-greenland-russia-china\/), a protectorate of EU member Denmark.\n\nA greater concern is that, in playing fast and loose with international law, Trump is playing into the hands of leaders — like Russia’s Vladimir Putin — who want to overturn the status quo. In a world where multiple fires are burning, Trump is liberally splashing gasoline and tossing matches to start new ones.\n\n### **Can Europe escape Trump’s wrath?**\nThe U.S. president has been amping up his rhetoric, on Sunday night [calling the EU an “atrocity.](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/donald-trump-trade-tariffs-says-eu-is-an-atrocity\/)” Brussels is desperate to engage, offering to buy more U.S. [liquefied natural gas](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/eu-ready-to-negotiate-donald-trump-boost-gas-import\/) or [weapons](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/eu-defense-summit-buying-us-weapons-donald-trump-ukraine-war-council-emmanuel-macron-antonio-costa\/) as Trump presses European governments to spend more on defense.\n\nLast time, Brussels answered Trump’s steel and aluminum tariffs by retaliating against motorbikes, jeans and bourbon — measures targeted to cause maximum pain in Republican strongholds.\n\nThe EU could do the same again — or [wield its trade “bazooka,”](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/eu-export-import-lng-fight-donald-trump-us-trade-war-wto-anti-coercion-instrument-subsidies\/) the anti-coercion instrument, which would put retaliation on a stronger legal footing. Experts worry, though, that the anti-coercion instrument may be too slow, because it foresees a period of consultation before action. The EU needs a new, bigger bazooka that can be fired in real time, they argue.\n\n### **Can Trump be stopped?**\nTrump is, for the first time, invoking emergency powers under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), so far only used by Joe Biden to impose sanctions against Russia over Putin’s war against Ukraine.\n\nAdvertisement\n\nAdvertisement\n\nThe IEEPA [hasn’t yet been used to justify tariffs](https:\/\/pro.politico.eu\/news\/193300) — and it’s possible that business groups which suffer financial injury as a result will take legal action. It’s unlikely, however, that a judge would issue an immediate injunction against the tariffs. Any litigation would likely be drawn out.\n\nThe U.S. Congress might also have the power to halt Trump’s trade war. On top of the doubtful justification that fentanyl and illegal immigration represent an economic emergency, the legislature has also delegated broad responsibility for trade policy to the president — it first did so to Franklin D. Roosevelt back in 1934 — and can take it back.\n\nBut with both the Senate and the House of Representatives under Republican control, a major rift would have to open up on trade to stop him in his tracks. And that looks unlikely right now.\n\nThen there’s the World Trade Organization — a global body created 30 years ago to act as an umpire in trade disputes. [It’s currently unable to fulfil that role](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/reform-die-usa-washington-world-trade-organization-wto-ngozi-okonjo-iweala-joe-biden\/), however, after both Trump and Biden blocked the appointment of judges to its Appellate Body, or highest court of appeal.\n\n### **The bottom line**\nFor Trump there are no rules. It’s the law of the jungle out there. So unless there is a strong political or judicial backlash in the United States against his trade war, he will be hard to stop.\n\nThen again, he might just do a deal.\n\n*This story has been updated.*\n\nAdvertisement\n\nRelated Tags\n\n[Aluminum](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/aluminium\/)   [Americas](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/americas\/)   [Anti-coercion instrument](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/anti-coercion-instrument\/)   [Appellate Body](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/appellate-body\/)   [Armaments](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/armaments\/)   [Borders](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/borders\/)   [Cars](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/cars\/)   [Companies](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/companies\/)   [Conflict](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/conflict\/)   [Courts](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/courts-2\/)   [Currencies](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/currencies\/)   [Defense](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/defense\/)   [Dumping\/Duties](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/dumpingduties\/)   [Electric vehicles](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/electric-vehicles\/)   [Employment](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/employment\/)   [Energy](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/energy\/)   [Growth](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/growth\/)   [Immigration](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/immigration\/)   [Imports](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/imports\/)   [Inflation](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/inflation\/)   [Investment](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/investment\/)   [Liquefied natural gas](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/liquefied-natural-gas\/)   [Markets](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/stock-markets\/)   [Overcapacity](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/overcapacity\/)   [Policy](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/policy\/)   [Rights](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/rights\/)   [Sanctions](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/sanctions\/)   [Services](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/services\/)   [Steel](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/steel\/)   [Supply chains](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/supply-chains\/)   [Tariffs](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/tariffs\/)   [Tax](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/taxation\/)   [Trade](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/trade\/)   [Trade war](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/trade-war\/)   [U.S. economy](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/u-s-economy\/)   [War](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/war\/)\n\nRelated Countries\n\n[Canada](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/country\/canada\/)   [China](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/country\/china\/)   [Denmark](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/country\/denmark\/)   [Greenland](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/country\/greenland\/)   [Mexico](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/country\/mexico\/)   [Russia](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/country\/russia\/)   [Taiwan](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/country\/taiwan\/)   [Ukraine](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/country\/ukraine\/)   [United States](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/country\/united-states\/)   [Vietnam](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/country\/vietnam\/)\n\nRelated People\n\n[Donald Trump](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/person\/donald-trump\/)   [Joe Biden](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/person\/joe-biden\/)   [Vladimir Putin](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/person\/vladimir-putin\/)\n\nRelated Organizations\n\n[Federal Reserve](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/eu-institution\/federal-reserve\/)\n\n## Our readers read next\n![UK officials saw ‘no need’ to vet Peter Mandelson, sacked Olly Robbins claims](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/cdn-cgi\/image\/width=380,height=253,quality=80,onerror=redirect,format=auto\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/21\/GettyImages-1130400161-scaled.jpg)\n\n## [UK officials saw ‘no need’ to vet Peter Mandelson, sacked Olly Robbins claims](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/uk-officials-saw-no-need-vet-peter-mandelson-sacked-olly-robbins-claims\/)\n54 MINS ago   4 mins read\n\n![EU top court strikes down Hungary’s anti-LGBTQ+ rules](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/cdn-cgi\/image\/width=380,height=253,quality=80,onerror=redirect,format=auto\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/21\/GettyImages-2238754753.jpg)\n\n## [EU top court strikes down Hungary’s anti-LGBTQ+ rules](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/eu-top-court-strikes-down-hungarys-anti-lgbtq-rules\/)\n1 HR ago   3 mins read\n\n![Why early action matters for cardiovascular health](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/cdn-cgi\/image\/width=380,height=214,quality=80,onerror=redirect,format=auto\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/17\/Shot-of-a-doctor-showing-a-patient-information-1.jpeg)\n\nSPONSORED CONTENT FROM SANOFI\n\n## [Why early action matters for cardiovascular health](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/sponsored-content\/why-early-action-matters-for-cardiovascular-health\/)\n5 HRS ago   6 mins read\n\n![No Orbán, no excuses](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/cdn-cgi\/image\/width=380,height=214,quality=80,onerror=redirect,format=auto\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/26\/Brussels-Playbook-Podcast_featured-image-updated-26-Feb-2026.png)\n\nPodcast\n\n## [No Orbán, no excuses](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/podcast\/brussels-playbook-podcast\/no-orban-no-excuses\/)\n6 HRS ago   2 mins read\n\n## More from Douglas Busvine\n![WTO meeting ends with no deal](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/cdn-cgi\/image\/width=380,height=253,quality=80,onerror=redirect,format=auto\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/30\/GettyImages-2266836236-scaled.jpg)\n\n## [WTO meeting ends with no deal](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/wto-meeting-ends-with-no-deal\/)\n“We have run out of time,” says Director-General Ngozi Okonjo Iweala.\n\nMar 30   3 mins read\n\n![Brussels to finally adopt ‘Made in Europe’ act after yet another rehash](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/cdn-cgi\/image\/width=380,height=253,quality=80,onerror=redirect,format=auto\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/03\/GettyImages-1232618760-scaled.jpg)\n\n## [Brussels to finally adopt ‘Made in Europe’ act after yet another rehash](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/eu-commission-to-adopt-industry-act-on-wednesday\/)\nIndustrial Accelerator Act finally lands after suffering repeated delays and undergoing yet more revisions.\n\nMar 3   3 mins read\n\n![EU-Mercosur mega trade deal: The winners and losers](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/cdn-cgi\/image\/width=380,height=285,quality=80,onerror=redirect,format=auto\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/09\/WhatsApp-Image-2026-01-09-at-4.36.10-PM.jpeg)\n\n## [EU-Mercosur mega trade deal: The winners and losers](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/eu-mercosur-trade-deal-the-winners-and-losers\/)\nPOLITICO analyzes who is uncorking the Malbec — and who is crying into their Bordeaux (cough, Emmanuel Macron, cough).\n\nJan 9   8 mins read\n\n![Europe’s year of Trump trade trauma](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/cdn-cgi\/image\/width=380,height=253,quality=80,onerror=redirect,format=auto\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/22\/GettyImages-2208000048.jpg)\n\n## [Europe’s year of Trump trade trauma](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/europe-year-of-us-donald-trump-trade-trauma-eu-von-der-leyen\/)\nThe U.S. president hurled a nonstop barrage of abuse at Europe in 2025. The EU had to suck it up — and do a one-sided trade deal.\n\nDec 24   7 mins read\n\n- - [Facebook](https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/POLITICOeu\/)\n  - [Twitter](https:\/\/twitter.com\/POLITICOEurope)\n  - [YouTube](https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCWMhlrCnmb14IkQBfiSXktA)\n- [App Store](https:\/\/apps.apple.com\/be\/app\/politico-pro-europe\/id1396447664)\n- [Play Store](https:\/\/play.google.com\/store\/apps\/details?id=eu.politico.promobile&hl=en_UK)\n\n- - [Policy](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/policy\/)\n    - [Agriculture and Food](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/agriculture\/)\n    - [Central Banker](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/central-banker\/)\n    - [Competition and Industrial Policy](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/competition\/)\n    - [Cybersecurity and Data Protection](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/cybersecurity\/)\n    - [Defense](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/defense\/)\n    - [Energy and Climate](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/energy\/)\n    - [Energy and Climate UK](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/energy-uk\/)\n    - [Energie et Climat France](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/energy-fr\/)\n    - [Financial Services](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/financial-services\/)\n    - [Financial Services UK](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/financial-services-uk\/)\n    - [Gesundheit](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/politico-pro-gesundheit-newsletter-trial\/)\n    - [Health Care](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/health-care\/)\n    - [Industrie & Handel](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/industrie-handel\/)\n    - [Mobility](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/mobility\/)\n    - [Paris Influence](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/paris-influence\/)\n    - [Sustainability](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/sustainability\/)\n    - [Technology](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/technology\/)\n    - [Tech France](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/technology-fr\/)\n    - [Technologie & KI](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/politico-pro-technologie-newsletter-trial\/)\n    - [Technology UK](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/technology-uk\/)\n    - [Trade](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/trade\/)\n    - [Trade UK](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/trade-uk\/)\n- - [Newsletters](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/newsletter\/)\n    - [Berlin Bulletin](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/newsletter\/berlin-bulletin\/)\n    - [Berlin Playbook](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/newsletter\/berlin-playbook\/)\n    - [Brussels Playbook](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/newsletter\/brussels-playbook\/)\n    - [Dimanchissime](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/newsletter\/dimanchissime\/)\n    - [EU Influence](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/newsletter\/politico-brussels-influence\/)\n    - [Global Playbook](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/newsletter\/global-playbook\/)\n    - [Global Policy Lab: Living Cities](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/livingcities\/)\n    - [Global Security](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/newsletter\/global-security\/)\n    - [London Influence](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/newsletter\/politico-london-influence\/)\n    - [London Playbook](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/newsletter\/london-playbook\/)\n    - [Le Weekly](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/newsletter\/le-weekly\/)\n    - [Playbook Paris](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/newsletter\/playbook-paris\/)\n    - [POLITICO Confidential](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/newsletter\/politico-confidential\/)\n    - [Sunday Crunch](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/newsletter\/sunday-crunch\/)\n- - [Podcasts](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/podcast)\n    - [Brussels Playbook Podcast](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/podcast\/brussels-playbook-podcast\/)\n    - [Westminster Insider](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/podcast\/westminster-insider\/)\n    - [Politics at Sam and Anne's](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/podcast\/politics-at-jack-and-sams\/)\n    - [Berlin Playbook — Der Podcast](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/podcast\/berlin-playbook-podcast\/)\n    - [Power & Policy](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/podcast\/power-and-policy\/)\n    - [Inside AfD](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/podcast\/inside-afd\/)\n  - [Opinion](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/opinion\/)\n    - [All Opinion](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/opinion\/)\n    - [Beyond the Bubble](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/beyond-the-bubble\/)\n    - [Germany Interpreted](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/germany-interpreted\/)\n    - [Declassified](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/declassified\/)\n    - [From Across the Pond](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/from-across-the-pond\/)\n    - [Unpacked](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/unpacked\/)\n- - [Featured Series](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they\/)\n    - [Danish Presidency of the EU](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/special-report\/danish-presidency-of-the-eu-special-report\/)\n    - [Europe’s looming water crisis](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/europe-water-crisis-resilience-strategy-eu-commission\/)\n    - [Polish Presidency of the EU](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/special-report\/polish-presidency-of-the-eu-special-report\/)\n    - [A global emergency: Tackling antimicrobial resistance](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/health-care-special-report-global-emergency-amr-antimicrobial-resistance\/)\n    - [Living Cities](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/livingcities\/)\n    - [POLITICO 28](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/politico-28-class-of-2026\/)\n  - [Subscriptions](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they\/)\n    - [POLITICO Pro](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/pro\/)\n    - [Print Edition](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/politico-print-edition\/)\n    - [Research and analysis division](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/research-analysis-division\/)\n  - [Editions](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they\/)\n    - [POLITICO Europe](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/)\n    - [POLITICO UK](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/uk\/)\n    - [POLITICO France](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/france-politics-news\/)\n    - [POLITICO Germany](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/tag\/german-politics\/)\n    - [POLITICO US](https:\/\/www.politico.com\/)\n\n- [Manage Privacy Settings](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they\/)\n- [About us](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/about-us)\n- [Contact us](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/contact-us)\n- [Privacy Policy](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/privacy-policy\/)\n- [Cookie Policy](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/cookies-info\/)\n- [Media Solutions](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/media-solutions)\n- [Research and Analysis Division](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/research-analysis-division\/)\n- [Agency IQ](https:\/\/www.agencyiq.com\/)\n- [Press](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/press)\n- [Print Edition](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/politico-print-edition\/)\n- [Careers at POLITICO](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/careers)\n- [Ts\\&Cs](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/terms-conditions\/)\n- [FAQs](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/frequently-asked-questions\/)","attrs_readable_markdown":"1. [News](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/news)\n2. [Trade](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/section\/trade\/)\n\nHow do tariffs actually work? How far will this conflict escalate? Can Europe escape? We answer all your burning questions.\n\nAI generated Text-to-speech\n\n- [Copy Link Copied](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they\/ \"Copy Link\")\n- [Share via email](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/cdn-cgi\/l\/email-protection#625d000d061b5f0a161612114751234750244750241515154c120d0e0b160b010d4c07174750240310160b010e07475024060d0c030e064f1610170f124f11031b114f16100306074f150310114f0310074f0703111b4f160d4f150b0c4f0310074f160a071b475024444152515a59111700080701165f260d0c030e064750523610170f1247505211031b114750521610030607475052150310114750520310074750520703111b475052160d475052150b0c4c4750522b11475052160a031647505216101707475124 \"EMail\")\n- [Share on X](https:\/\/x.com\/intent\/post\/?url=https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they\/&text=Donald%20Trump%20says%20trade%20wars%20are%20easy%20to%20win.%20Is%20that%20true%3F \"X\")\n- [Share on WhatsApp](https:\/\/api.whatsapp.com\/send?text=Donald%20Trump%20says%20trade%20wars%20are%20easy%20to%20win.%20Is%20that%20true%3F%20https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they\/ \"WhatsApp\")\n- [Share on LinkedIn](https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/sharing\/share-offsite\/?url=https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they\/&title=Donald%20Trump%20says%20trade%20wars%20are%20easy%20to%20win.%20Is%20that%20true%3F&summary=Donald%20Trump%20says%20trade%20wars%20are%20easy%20to%20win.%20Is%20that%20true%3F&source=https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they\/ \"Linkedin\")\n\n[Free article usually reserved for subscribers](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/pro\/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they\/)\n\n![US-POLITICS-TRUMP-WEALTH-FUND](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/cdn-cgi\/image\/width=1160,height=773,quality=80,onerror=redirect,format=auto\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/03\/trump-scaled.jpg)\n\nTrump affirme vouloir utiliser l’arme des droits de douane pour stopper le flux de fentanyl et de migrants illégaux aux frontières nord et sud des Etats-Unis. \\| Jim Watson\/AFP via Getty Images\n\nThis article is also available in: [French](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/les-guerres-commerciales-sont-elles-si-faciles-a-gagner-comme-laffirme-trump\/)\n\nFebruary 3, 2025   7:50 pm CET\n\nBy  [Douglas Busvine](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/author\/doug-busvine\/)\n\nBERLIN — Donald Trump makes light of trade wars, claiming they are [easy to win](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/donald-trump-trade-wars-are-good\/). We’re about to find out if he’s right.\n\nThe U.S. president has imposed tariffs of 10 percent on China from Tuesday, while Mexico and Canada won [last-minute stays of execution](https:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/2025\/02\/03\/canada-tarriff-paused-trudeau-trump-00202212) on 25 percent tariffs. He’s also threatening to [hit the European Union](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/donald-trump-trade-war-eu-tariffs-mexico-canada\/) — a major exporter of cars, medicines and food to the United States.\n\nTrump says he wants to use the tariff weapon to halt the flow of fentanyl and illegal migrants across the northern and southern borders of the United States. To do so he has invoked emergency powers — even though the U.S. economy is growing strongly and is at full employment.\n\nAdvertisement\n\nHe also wants to close the \\$1 trillion U.S. trade deficit with the rest of the world. Team Trump argues that [throwing up a tariff wall](https:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/2024\/11\/12\/lighthizer-trump-new-tariff-plan-00189114) will force companies to move investment and jobs back to the U.S. — think of all those silicon chips now made in Taiwan or iPhones made in China.\n\nBut critics warn that Trump’s trade war will [result in higher prices](https:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/2025\/02\/02\/summers-tariffs-self-inflicted-wound-american-economy-00201978), lower growth, lost jobs and disrupted supply chains — both at home and abroad. They also argue that tariffs are the wrong tool to fix a trade deficit caused by America’s borrowing and consumption habits.\n\nHere’s what Trump’s trade war is all about:\n\n### **What’s a trade war?**\nFirst up, a trade war isn’t an actual war: It’s a conflict that results when one side feels that a trading relationship is unfair. Let’s say you flood my market with cheap steel, at prices below the cost of production. Companies in my country are going to the wall. They are laying off workers. My voters. That’s dumping and, under the rules of global trade, I can retaliate by imposing tariffs on your steel.\n\nFor a trade conflict like this to turn into a trade war, things need to escalate. And that’s what is happening here: Trump is still threatening to hit America’s closest trading partners with tariffs on pretty much everything. That means we could be about to embark on the biggest trade war since the 1930s.\n\n### **How do tariffs work?**\nTrump claims that his new tariffs will make Americans rich — he’s even promised to set up a new [External Revenue Service](https:\/\/www.politico.com\/live-updates\/2025\/01\/14\/congress\/trump-to-create-external-revenue-service-for-tariffs-00198155) to collect all the revenues that they throw off. He also says foreign companies will pay them and that they won’t hurt U.S. consumers.\n\nAdvertisement\n\nThat’s not how they work, however. Tariffs are a tax that is paid by the importer at the border. If they go up, the importer faces a choice — to pass on the price increase to the consumer, or to accept a squeeze on their profit margins.\n\nPrice increases from Trump’s across-the-board tariffs would show up immediately in consumer inflation, economists say. And although he has promised to offset their impact with tax cuts elsewhere, there is no sign of that happening yet.\n\nAs for the potential revenue from tariffs, Trump likes to [hark back to the late 19th century](https:\/\/truthsocial.com\/@realDonaldTrump\/posts\/113755116467958801), when tariffs accounted for over half of U.S. federal revenues. But that was before income tax — which today supports a government much larger in relation to the overall economy. There is just no way that tariff revenues can pay for a modern state.\n\n### **When was the last trade war?**\nIn [Trump’s first term](https:\/\/www.politico.com\/story\/2018\/03\/01\/trump-steel-tariffs-432143). He imposed 25 percent duties on steel and 10 percent on aluminum in 2018 — while the European Union responded by slapping \\$6 billion in tariffs on Harley Davidson motorbikes, Levi’s jeans and bourbon.\n\nTrump threatened to escalate by hitting imports of European cars — but [it never came to that](https:\/\/www.politico.com\/story\/2018\/07\/19\/trump-auto-tariff-commerce-hearing-698100). Eventually, the tariffs were suspended by both sides. The EU [truce expires](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/brussels-to-announce-us-tariffs-truce-monday\/) at the end of March, meaning that even if Trump doesn’t hit Europe with tariffs now, their trade dispute could still get out of hand.\n\nThe clearest precedent is likely the so-called Nixon shock of 1971. The starting point was comparable to today: The costs of the Vietnam War and of the Great Society policies of the 1960s had tipped the United States from surplus into deficit.\n\nAdvertisement\n\nIn an attempt to restore the balance, President Richard Nixon abolished the gold standard — forcing the trading partners of the U.S. to revalue their currencies. He ordered a 90-day freeze on wages and prices. And he imposed a 10 percent import tax.\n\nNixon’s actions are considered to have been a political success but an economic failure. The import tax was scrapped within months. And the U.S. economy struggled for years with stagflation — a combination of low growth and high inflation — that was only squeezed out of the system in the 1980s by Federal Reserve Chair Paul Volcker’s tough monetary policies.\n\n### **Who is the real enemy?**\nChina. Although Trump has only threatened to hit China with tariffs of 10 percent, the tariffs still hanging over Canada and Mexico are indirectly aimed at Beijing.\n\nThat’s because, under the USMCA trade accord (the successor to NAFTA), Chinese companies — e.g. makers of electric vehicles — would normally enjoy duty-free access to the U.S. market if they locate production in North America.\n\nIn recent years there has been bipartisan consensus in Washington on the need to fight back against China and its economic model, which has created vast industrial overcapacity and has flooded world markets with surplus production. Since taking office, however, Trump has dialed back the rhetoric, saying he just wants a “fair” trading relationship with China.\n\nOne thing to watch: Will Trump drop the tariffs against America’s allies if [they agree to align with the United States](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/fear-and-loathing-in-davos-eu-frets-about-its-lose-lose-choice-between-trumps-us-and-xis-china\/) in shutting out China? That’s one straw [the European Union is clutching at](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/eu-donald-turmp-maros-sefcovic-ursula-von-der-leyen-lets-deal\/) in the hope of keeping the transatlantic peace.\n\nAdvertisement\n\n### **How far can this escalate?**\nTrump, in his second incarnation as U.S. president, has shown no inhibitions in questioning the territorial integrity of other nations — jibing that Canada [should become the 51st U.S. state](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/us-donald-trump-says-great-idea-to-make-canada-the-51st-state-justin-trudeau\/) or [staking a claim to Greenland](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/us-donald-trump-greenland-russia-china\/), a protectorate of EU member Denmark.\n\nA greater concern is that, in playing fast and loose with international law, Trump is playing into the hands of leaders — like Russia’s Vladimir Putin — who want to overturn the status quo. In a world where multiple fires are burning, Trump is liberally splashing gasoline and tossing matches to start new ones.\n\n### **Can Europe escape Trump’s wrath?**\nThe U.S. president has been amping up his rhetoric, on Sunday night [calling the EU an “atrocity.](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/donald-trump-trade-tariffs-says-eu-is-an-atrocity\/)” Brussels is desperate to engage, offering to buy more U.S. [liquefied natural gas](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/eu-ready-to-negotiate-donald-trump-boost-gas-import\/) or [weapons](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/eu-defense-summit-buying-us-weapons-donald-trump-ukraine-war-council-emmanuel-macron-antonio-costa\/) as Trump presses European governments to spend more on defense.\n\nLast time, Brussels answered Trump’s steel and aluminum tariffs by retaliating against motorbikes, jeans and bourbon — measures targeted to cause maximum pain in Republican strongholds.\n\nThe EU could do the same again — or [wield its trade “bazooka,”](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/eu-export-import-lng-fight-donald-trump-us-trade-war-wto-anti-coercion-instrument-subsidies\/) the anti-coercion instrument, which would put retaliation on a stronger legal footing. Experts worry, though, that the anti-coercion instrument may be too slow, because it foresees a period of consultation before action. The EU needs a new, bigger bazooka that can be fired in real time, they argue.\n\n### **Can Trump be stopped?**\nTrump is, for the first time, invoking emergency powers under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), so far only used by Joe Biden to impose sanctions against Russia over Putin’s war against Ukraine.\n\nAdvertisement\n\nThe IEEPA [hasn’t yet been used to justify tariffs](https:\/\/pro.politico.eu\/news\/193300) — and it’s possible that business groups which suffer financial injury as a result will take legal action. It’s unlikely, however, that a judge would issue an immediate injunction against the tariffs. Any litigation would likely be drawn out.\n\nThe U.S. Congress might also have the power to halt Trump’s trade war. On top of the doubtful justification that fentanyl and illegal immigration represent an economic emergency, the legislature has also delegated broad responsibility for trade policy to the president — it first did so to Franklin D. Roosevelt back in 1934 — and can take it back.\n\nBut with both the Senate and the House of Representatives under Republican control, a major rift would have to open up on trade to stop him in his tracks. And that looks unlikely right now.\n\nThen there’s the World Trade Organization — a global body created 30 years ago to act as an umpire in trade disputes. [It’s currently unable to fulfil that role](https:\/\/www.politico.eu\/article\/reform-die-usa-washington-world-trade-organization-wto-ngozi-okonjo-iweala-joe-biden\/), however, after both Trump and Biden blocked the appointment of judges to its Appellate Body, or highest court of appeal.\n\n### **The bottom line**\nFor Trump there are no rules. It’s the law of the jungle out there. So unless there is a strong political or judicial backlash in the United States against his trade war, he will be hard to stop.\n\nThen again, he might just do a deal.\n\n*This story has been updated.*\n\nAdvertisement","meta_canonical":null}

3. Robots.txt Check

Query:

Response:

4. Spam/Ban Check

Query:

Response:

5. Seen Status Check

ℹ️ Skipped - page is already crawled

📄

INDEXABLE

✅

CRAWLED

21 hours ago

🤖

ROBOTS ALLOWED

Page Info Filters

Filter	Status	Condition	Details
HTTP status	PASS	`download_http_code = 200`	HTTP 200
Age cutoff	PASS	`download_stamp > now() - 6 MONTH`	0 months ago
History drop	PASS	`isNull(history_drop_reason)`	No drop reason
Spam/ban	PASS	`fh_dont_index != 1 AND ml_spam_score = 0`	ml_spam_score=0
Canonical	PASS	`meta_canonical IS NULL OR = '' OR = src_unparsed`	Not set

Page Details

Property	Value
URL	https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they/
Last Crawled	2026-04-21 10:11:45 (21 hours ago)
First Indexed	2025-02-04 03:34:41 (1 year ago)
HTTP Status Code	200
Meta Title	Donald Trump says trade wars are easy to win. Is that true? – POLITICO
Meta Description	How do tariffs actually work? How far will this conflict escalate? Can Europe escape? We answer all your burning questions.
Meta Canonical	null
Boilerpipe Text	News Trade How do tariffs actually work? How far will this conflict escalate? Can Europe escape? We answer all your burning questions. AI generated Text-to-speech Copy Link Copied Share via email Share on X Share on WhatsApp Share on LinkedIn Free article usually reserved for subscribers Trump affirme vouloir utiliser l’arme des droits de douane pour stopper le flux de fentanyl et de migrants illégaux aux frontières nord et sud des Etats-Unis. \| Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images This article is also available in: French February 3, 2025 7:50 pm CET By Douglas Busvine BERLIN — Donald Trump makes light of trade wars, claiming they are easy to win . We’re about to find out if he’s right. The U.S. president has imposed tariffs of 10 percent on China from Tuesday, while Mexico and Canada won last-minute stays of execution on 25 percent tariffs. He’s also threatening to hit the European Union — a major exporter of cars, medicines and food to the United States. Trump says he wants to use the tariff weapon to halt the flow of fentanyl and illegal migrants across the northern and southern borders of the United States. To do so he has invoked emergency powers — even though the U.S. economy is growing strongly and is at full employment. Advertisement He also wants to close the $1 trillion U.S. trade deficit with the rest of the world. Team Trump argues that throwing up a tariff wall will force companies to move investment and jobs back to the U.S. — think of all those silicon chips now made in Taiwan or iPhones made in China. But critics warn that Trump’s trade war will result in higher prices , lower growth, lost jobs and disrupted supply chains — both at home and abroad. They also argue that tariffs are the wrong tool to fix a trade deficit caused by America’s borrowing and consumption habits. Here’s what Trump’s trade war is all about: What’s a trade war? First up, a trade war isn’t an actual war: It’s a conflict that results when one side feels that a trading relationship is unfair. Let’s say you flood my market with cheap steel, at prices below the cost of production. Companies in my country are going to the wall. They are laying off workers. My voters. That’s dumping and, under the rules of global trade, I can retaliate by imposing tariffs on your steel. For a trade conflict like this to turn into a trade war, things need to escalate. And that’s what is happening here: Trump is still threatening to hit America’s closest trading partners with tariffs on pretty much everything. That means we could be about to embark on the biggest trade war since the 1930s. How do tariffs work? Trump claims that his new tariffs will make Americans rich — he’s even promised to set up a new External Revenue Service to collect all the revenues that they throw off. He also says foreign companies will pay them and that they won’t hurt U.S. consumers. Advertisement That’s not how they work, however. Tariffs are a tax that is paid by the importer at the border. If they go up, the importer faces a choice — to pass on the price increase to the consumer, or to accept a squeeze on their profit margins. Price increases from Trump’s across-the-board tariffs would show up immediately in consumer inflation, economists say. And although he has promised to offset their impact with tax cuts elsewhere, there is no sign of that happening yet. As for the potential revenue from tariffs, Trump likes to hark back to the late 19th century , when tariffs accounted for over half of U.S. federal revenues. But that was before income tax — which today supports a government much larger in relation to the overall economy. There is just no way that tariff revenues can pay for a modern state. When was the last trade war? In Trump’s first term . He imposed 25 percent duties on steel and 10 percent on aluminum in 2018 — while the European Union responded by slapping $6 billion in tariffs on Harley Davidson motorbikes, Levi’s jeans and bourbon. Trump threatened to escalate by hitting imports of European cars — but it never came to that . Eventually, the tariffs were suspended by both sides. The EU truce expires at the end of March, meaning that even if Trump doesn’t hit Europe with tariffs now, their trade dispute could still get out of hand. The clearest precedent is likely the so-called Nixon shock of 1971. The starting point was comparable to today: The costs of the Vietnam War and of the Great Society policies of the 1960s had tipped the United States from surplus into deficit. Advertisement In an attempt to restore the balance, President Richard Nixon abolished the gold standard — forcing the trading partners of the U.S. to revalue their currencies. He ordered a 90-day freeze on wages and prices. And he imposed a 10 percent import tax. Nixon’s actions are considered to have been a political success but an economic failure. The import tax was scrapped within months. And the U.S. economy struggled for years with stagflation — a combination of low growth and high inflation — that was only squeezed out of the system in the 1980s by Federal Reserve Chair Paul Volcker’s tough monetary policies. Who is the real enemy? China. Although Trump has only threatened to hit China with tariffs of 10 percent, the tariffs still hanging over Canada and Mexico are indirectly aimed at Beijing. That’s because, under the USMCA trade accord (the successor to NAFTA), Chinese companies — e.g. makers of electric vehicles — would normally enjoy duty-free access to the U.S. market if they locate production in North America. In recent years there has been bipartisan consensus in Washington on the need to fight back against China and its economic model, which has created vast industrial overcapacity and has flooded world markets with surplus production. Since taking office, however, Trump has dialed back the rhetoric, saying he just wants a “fair” trading relationship with China. One thing to watch: Will Trump drop the tariffs against America’s allies if they agree to align with the United States in shutting out China? That’s one straw the European Union is clutching at in the hope of keeping the transatlantic peace. Advertisement How far can this escalate? Trump, in his second incarnation as U.S. president, has shown no inhibitions in questioning the territorial integrity of other nations — jibing that Canada should become the 51st U.S. state or staking a claim to Greenland , a protectorate of EU member Denmark. A greater concern is that, in playing fast and loose with international law, Trump is playing into the hands of leaders — like Russia’s Vladimir Putin — who want to overturn the status quo. In a world where multiple fires are burning, Trump is liberally splashing gasoline and tossing matches to start new ones. Can Europe escape Trump’s wrath? The U.S. president has been amping up his rhetoric, on Sunday night calling the EU an “atrocity. ” Brussels is desperate to engage, offering to buy more U.S. liquefied natural gas or weapons as Trump presses European governments to spend more on defense. Last time, Brussels answered Trump’s steel and aluminum tariffs by retaliating against motorbikes, jeans and bourbon — measures targeted to cause maximum pain in Republican strongholds. The EU could do the same again — or wield its trade “bazooka,” the anti-coercion instrument, which would put retaliation on a stronger legal footing. Experts worry, though, that the anti-coercion instrument may be too slow, because it foresees a period of consultation before action. The EU needs a new, bigger bazooka that can be fired in real time, they argue. Can Trump be stopped? Trump is, for the first time, invoking emergency powers under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), so far only used by Joe Biden to impose sanctions against Russia over Putin’s war against Ukraine. Advertisement The IEEPA hasn’t yet been used to justify tariffs — and it’s possible that business groups which suffer financial injury as a result will take legal action. It’s unlikely, however, that a judge would issue an immediate injunction against the tariffs. Any litigation would likely be drawn out. The U.S. Congress might also have the power to halt Trump’s trade war. On top of the doubtful justification that fentanyl and illegal immigration represent an economic emergency, the legislature has also delegated broad responsibility for trade policy to the president — it first did so to Franklin D. Roosevelt back in 1934 — and can take it back. But with both the Senate and the House of Representatives under Republican control, a major rift would have to open up on trade to stop him in his tracks. And that looks unlikely right now. Then there’s the World Trade Organization — a global body created 30 years ago to act as an umpire in trade disputes. It’s currently unable to fulfil that role , however, after both Trump and Biden blocked the appointment of judges to its Appellate Body, or highest court of appeal. The bottom line For Trump there are no rules. It’s the law of the jungle out there. So unless there is a strong political or judicial backlash in the United States against his trade war, he will be hard to stop. Then again, he might just do a deal. This story has been updated. Advertisement
Markdown	![](https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=394368290733607&ev=PageView&noscript=1) [Skip to main content](https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they/#main) Advertisement Menu Edition: Europe - [Europe](https://www.politico.eu/?no-geo-redirect) - [UK](https://www.politico.eu/uk/) - [France](https://www.politico.eu/france-politics-news/) - [Germany](https://www.politico.eu/tag/german-politics/) - [US](https://www.politico.com/) - - [Policy areas](https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they/) - [Agriculture and Food](https://www.politico.eu/section/agriculture/) - [Central Banker](https://www.politico.eu/section/central-banker/) - [Competition and Industrial Policy](https://www.politico.eu/section/competition/) - [Cybersecurity and Data Protection](https://www.politico.eu/section/cybersecurity/) - [Defense](https://www.politico.eu/section/defense/) - [Energy and Climate](https://www.politico.eu/section/energy/) - [Energy and Climate UK](https://www.politico.eu/section/energy-uk/) - [Energie et Climat France](https://www.politico.eu/section/energy-fr/) - [Energie & Klima DE](https://www.politico.eu/politico-pro-energie-klima-am-morgen-newsletter-trial/) - [Financial Services](https://www.politico.eu/section/financial-services/) - [Financial Services UK](https://www.politico.eu/section/financial-services-uk/) - [Gesundheit](https://www.politico.eu/politico-pro-gesundheit-newsletter-trial/) - [Health Care](https://www.politico.eu/section/health-care/) - [Industrie & Handel DE](https://www.politico.eu/section/industrie-handel/) - [Mobility](https://www.politico.eu/section/mobility/) - [Paris Influence](https://www.politico.eu/section/paris-influence/) - [Sustainability](https://www.politico.eu/section/sustainability/) - [Technology](https://www.politico.eu/section/technology/) - [Tech France](https://www.politico.eu/section/technology-fr/) - [Technologie & KI](https://www.politico.eu/politico-pro-technologie-newsletter-trial/) - [Technology UK](https://www.politico.eu/section/technology-uk/) - [Trade](https://www.politico.eu/section/trade/) - [Trade UK](https://www.politico.eu/section/trade-uk/) - - [Newsletters](https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/) - [Berlin Bulletin](https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/berlin-bulletin/) - [Berlin Playbook](https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/berlin-playbook) - [Brussels Playbook](https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/brussels-playbook/) - [Dimanchissime](https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/dimanchissime/) - [EU Influence](https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/politico-eu-influence/) - [Forecast](https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/forecast/) - [Global Playbook](https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/global-playbook/) - [Global Policy Lab: Living Cities](https://www.politico.eu/livingcities/) - [Global Security](https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/global-security/) - [Le Weekly](https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/le-weekly/) - [London Influence](https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/politico-london-influence/) - [London Playbook](https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/london-playbook/) - [Playbook Paris](https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/playbook-paris/) - [POLITICO Confidential](https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/politico-confidential/) - [Sunday Crunch](https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/sunday-crunch/) - - [Podcasts](https://www.politico.eu/podcast/) - [Brussels Playbook Podcast](https://www.politico.eu/podcast/brussels-playbook-podcast/) - [Westminster Insider](https://www.politico.eu/podcast/westminster-insider/) - [Politics at Sam and Anne's](https://www.politico.eu/podcast/politics-at-jack-and-sams/) - [Berlin Playbook — Der Podcast](https://www.politico.eu/podcast/berlin-playbook-podcast/) - [Power & Policy](https://www.politico.eu/podcast/power-and-policy/) - [Inside AfD](https://www.politico.eu/podcast/inside-afd/) - [Opinion](https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they/) - [All Opinion](https://www.politico.eu/section/opinion/) - [Beyond the Bubble](https://www.politico.eu/tag/beyond-the-bubble/) - [Germany Interpreted](https://www.politico.eu/tag/germany-interpreted/) - [Declassified](https://www.politico.eu/tag/declassified/) - [From Across the Pond](https://www.politico.eu/tag/from-across-the-pond/) - [Unpacked](https://www.politico.eu/tag/unpacked/) - - [Featured Series](https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they/) - [Danish Presidency of the EU](https://www.politico.eu/special-report/danish-presidency-of-the-eu-special-report/) - [Europe’s looming water crisis](https://www.politico.eu/europe-water-crisis-resilience-strategy-eu-commission/) - [Breaking out: Stories of Roma empowerment](https://www.politico.eu/politico-special-report-breaking-out-roma-community-europe-empowerment/) - [COP30](https://www.politico.eu/cop30-latest-news-united-nations-climate-summit/) - [A global emergency: Tackling antimicrobial resistance](https://www.politico.eu/health-care-special-report-global-emergency-amr-antimicrobial-resistance/) - [Living Cities](https://www.politico.eu/livingcities/) - [POLITICO 28](https://www.politico.eu/politico-28-class-of-2026/) - [Poll of polls](https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they/) - [Elections in Europe](https://www.politico.eu/europe-poll-of-polls/) - [European Parliament election](https://www.politico.eu/europe-poll-of-polls/european-parliament-election/) - [Politico Live](https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they/) - [See All Future Events](https://www.politico.eu/events/future-events/) - [About our events](https://www.politico.eu/about-politico-events/) - - [Apps](https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they/) - [Apple Store](https://apps.apple.com/be/app/politico-pro-europe/id1396447664) - [Google Play Store](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=eu.politico.promobile&hl=en_UK) - [More Info](https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they/) - [About us](https://www.politico.eu/about-us/) - [Media Solutions](https://www.politico.eu/media-solutions/) - [POLITICO Studio](https://www.politico.eu/politico-studio/) - [Press](https://www.politico.eu/press/) - [Print Edition](https://www.politico.eu/politico-print-edition/) - [Contact Us](https://www.politico.eu/contact-us/) - [Careers at POLITICO](https://www.politico.eu/careers/) [POLITICO Pro](https://www.politico.eu/pro/) Europe - [Europe](https://www.politico.eu/?no-geo-redirect) - [UK](https://www.politico.eu/uk/) - [France](https://www.politico.eu/france-politics-news/) - [Germany](https://www.politico.eu/tag/german-politics/) - [US](https://www.politico.com/) [Log In](https://www.politico.eu/login/) [POLITICO Pro](https://www.politico.eu/pro/) - [Home](https://www.politico.eu/) - [Latest news](https://www.politico.eu/latest/) - [War in Iran](https://www.politico.eu/tag/war-in-iran/) - [Energy crisis](https://www.politico.eu/tag/energy-crisis/) - [War in Ukraine](https://www.politico.eu/tag/war-in-ukraine/) - [Newsletters](https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/) - [Podcasts](https://www.politico.eu/podcast/) - [Poll of Polls](https://www.politico.eu/europe-poll-of-polls) - [Policy news](https://www.politico.eu/section/policy/) - [Events](https://www.politico.eu/events/future-events/) 1. [News](https://www.politico.eu/news) 2. [Trade](https://www.politico.eu/section/trade/) # Donald Trump says trade wars are easy to win. Is that true? How do tariffs actually work? How far will this conflict escalate? Can Europe escape? We answer all your burning questions. Listen AI generated Text-to-speech - [Copy Link Copied](https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they/ "Copy Link") - [Share via email](https://www.politico.eu/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#625d000d061b5f0a161612114751234750244750241515154c120d0e0b160b010d4c07174750240310160b010e07475024060d0c030e064f1610170f124f11031b114f16100306074f150310114f0310074f0703111b4f160d4f150b0c4f0310074f160a071b475024444152515a59111700080701165f260d0c030e064750523610170f1247505211031b114750521610030607475052150310114750520310074750520703111b475052160d475052150b0c4c4750522b11475052160a031647505216101707475124 "EMail") - [Share on X](https://x.com/intent/post/?url=https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they/&text=Donald%20Trump%20says%20trade%20wars%20are%20easy%20to%20win.%20Is%20that%20true%3F "X") - [Share on WhatsApp](https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=Donald%20Trump%20says%20trade%20wars%20are%20easy%20to%20win.%20Is%20that%20true%3F%20https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they/ "WhatsApp") - [Share on LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they/&title=Donald%20Trump%20says%20trade%20wars%20are%20easy%20to%20win.%20Is%20that%20true%3F&summary=Donald%20Trump%20says%20trade%20wars%20are%20easy%20to%20win.%20Is%20that%20true%3F&source=https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they/ "Linkedin") [Free article usually reserved for subscribers](https://www.politico.eu/pro/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they/) ![US-POLITICS-TRUMP-WEALTH-FUND](https://www.politico.eu/cdn-cgi/image/width=1160,height=773,quality=80,onerror=redirect,format=auto/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/03/trump-scaled.jpg) Trump affirme vouloir utiliser l’arme des droits de douane pour stopper le flux de fentanyl et de migrants illégaux aux frontières nord et sud des Etats-Unis. \\| Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images This article is also available in: [French](https://www.politico.eu/article/les-guerres-commerciales-sont-elles-si-faciles-a-gagner-comme-laffirme-trump/) February 3, 2025 7:50 pm CET By [Douglas Busvine](https://www.politico.eu/author/doug-busvine/) BERLIN — Donald Trump makes light of trade wars, claiming they are [easy to win](https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-trade-wars-are-good/). We’re about to find out if he’s right. The U.S. president has imposed tariffs of 10 percent on China from Tuesday, while Mexico and Canada won [last-minute stays of execution](https://www.politico.com/news/2025/02/03/canada-tarriff-paused-trudeau-trump-00202212) on 25 percent tariffs. He’s also threatening to [hit the European Union](https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-trade-war-eu-tariffs-mexico-canada/) — a major exporter of cars, medicines and food to the United States. Trump says he wants to use the tariff weapon to halt the flow of fentanyl and illegal migrants across the northern and southern borders of the United States. To do so he has invoked emergency powers — even though the U.S. economy is growing strongly and is at full employment. Advertisement Advertisement He also wants to close the \$1 trillion U.S. trade deficit with the rest of the world. Team Trump argues that [throwing up a tariff wall](https://www.politico.com/news/2024/11/12/lighthizer-trump-new-tariff-plan-00189114) will force companies to move investment and jobs back to the U.S. — think of all those silicon chips now made in Taiwan or iPhones made in China. But critics warn that Trump’s trade war will [result in higher prices](https://www.politico.com/news/2025/02/02/summers-tariffs-self-inflicted-wound-american-economy-00201978), lower growth, lost jobs and disrupted supply chains — both at home and abroad. They also argue that tariffs are the wrong tool to fix a trade deficit caused by America’s borrowing and consumption habits. Here’s what Trump’s trade war is all about: ### What’s a trade war? First up, a trade war isn’t an actual war: It’s a conflict that results when one side feels that a trading relationship is unfair. Let’s say you flood my market with cheap steel, at prices below the cost of production. Companies in my country are going to the wall. They are laying off workers. My voters. That’s dumping and, under the rules of global trade, I can retaliate by imposing tariffs on your steel. For a trade conflict like this to turn into a trade war, things need to escalate. And that’s what is happening here: Trump is still threatening to hit America’s closest trading partners with tariffs on pretty much everything. That means we could be about to embark on the biggest trade war since the 1930s. ### How do tariffs work? Trump claims that his new tariffs will make Americans rich — he’s even promised to set up a new [External Revenue Service](https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/01/14/congress/trump-to-create-external-revenue-service-for-tariffs-00198155) to collect all the revenues that they throw off. He also says foreign companies will pay them and that they won’t hurt U.S. consumers. Advertisement Advertisement That’s not how they work, however. Tariffs are a tax that is paid by the importer at the border. If they go up, the importer faces a choice — to pass on the price increase to the consumer, or to accept a squeeze on their profit margins. Price increases from Trump’s across-the-board tariffs would show up immediately in consumer inflation, economists say. And although he has promised to offset their impact with tax cuts elsewhere, there is no sign of that happening yet. As for the potential revenue from tariffs, Trump likes to [hark back to the late 19th century](https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113755116467958801), when tariffs accounted for over half of U.S. federal revenues. But that was before income tax — which today supports a government much larger in relation to the overall economy. There is just no way that tariff revenues can pay for a modern state. ### When was the last trade war? In [Trump’s first term](https://www.politico.com/story/2018/03/01/trump-steel-tariffs-432143). He imposed 25 percent duties on steel and 10 percent on aluminum in 2018 — while the European Union responded by slapping \$6 billion in tariffs on Harley Davidson motorbikes, Levi’s jeans and bourbon. Trump threatened to escalate by hitting imports of European cars — but [it never came to that](https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/19/trump-auto-tariff-commerce-hearing-698100). Eventually, the tariffs were suspended by both sides. The EU [truce expires](https://www.politico.eu/article/brussels-to-announce-us-tariffs-truce-monday/) at the end of March, meaning that even if Trump doesn’t hit Europe with tariffs now, their trade dispute could still get out of hand. The clearest precedent is likely the so-called Nixon shock of 1971. The starting point was comparable to today: The costs of the Vietnam War and of the Great Society policies of the 1960s had tipped the United States from surplus into deficit. Advertisement Advertisement In an attempt to restore the balance, President Richard Nixon abolished the gold standard — forcing the trading partners of the U.S. to revalue their currencies. He ordered a 90-day freeze on wages and prices. And he imposed a 10 percent import tax. Nixon’s actions are considered to have been a political success but an economic failure. The import tax was scrapped within months. And the U.S. economy struggled for years with stagflation — a combination of low growth and high inflation — that was only squeezed out of the system in the 1980s by Federal Reserve Chair Paul Volcker’s tough monetary policies. ### Who is the real enemy? China. Although Trump has only threatened to hit China with tariffs of 10 percent, the tariffs still hanging over Canada and Mexico are indirectly aimed at Beijing. That’s because, under the USMCA trade accord (the successor to NAFTA), Chinese companies — e.g. makers of electric vehicles — would normally enjoy duty-free access to the U.S. market if they locate production in North America. In recent years there has been bipartisan consensus in Washington on the need to fight back against China and its economic model, which has created vast industrial overcapacity and has flooded world markets with surplus production. Since taking office, however, Trump has dialed back the rhetoric, saying he just wants a “fair” trading relationship with China. One thing to watch: Will Trump drop the tariffs against America’s allies if [they agree to align with the United States](https://www.politico.eu/article/fear-and-loathing-in-davos-eu-frets-about-its-lose-lose-choice-between-trumps-us-and-xis-china/) in shutting out China? That’s one straw [the European Union is clutching at](https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-donald-turmp-maros-sefcovic-ursula-von-der-leyen-lets-deal/) in the hope of keeping the transatlantic peace. Advertisement Advertisement ### How far can this escalate? Trump, in his second incarnation as U.S. president, has shown no inhibitions in questioning the territorial integrity of other nations — jibing that Canada [should become the 51st U.S. state](https://www.politico.eu/article/us-donald-trump-says-great-idea-to-make-canada-the-51st-state-justin-trudeau/) or [staking a claim to Greenland](https://www.politico.eu/article/us-donald-trump-greenland-russia-china/), a protectorate of EU member Denmark. A greater concern is that, in playing fast and loose with international law, Trump is playing into the hands of leaders — like Russia’s Vladimir Putin — who want to overturn the status quo. In a world where multiple fires are burning, Trump is liberally splashing gasoline and tossing matches to start new ones. ### Can Europe escape Trump’s wrath? The U.S. president has been amping up his rhetoric, on Sunday night [calling the EU an “atrocity.](https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-trade-tariffs-says-eu-is-an-atrocity/)” Brussels is desperate to engage, offering to buy more U.S. [liquefied natural gas](https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-ready-to-negotiate-donald-trump-boost-gas-import/) or [weapons](https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-defense-summit-buying-us-weapons-donald-trump-ukraine-war-council-emmanuel-macron-antonio-costa/) as Trump presses European governments to spend more on defense. Last time, Brussels answered Trump’s steel and aluminum tariffs by retaliating against motorbikes, jeans and bourbon — measures targeted to cause maximum pain in Republican strongholds. The EU could do the same again — or [wield its trade “bazooka,”](https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-export-import-lng-fight-donald-trump-us-trade-war-wto-anti-coercion-instrument-subsidies/) the anti-coercion instrument, which would put retaliation on a stronger legal footing. Experts worry, though, that the anti-coercion instrument may be too slow, because it foresees a period of consultation before action. The EU needs a new, bigger bazooka that can be fired in real time, they argue. ### Can Trump be stopped? Trump is, for the first time, invoking emergency powers under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), so far only used by Joe Biden to impose sanctions against Russia over Putin’s war against Ukraine. Advertisement Advertisement The IEEPA [hasn’t yet been used to justify tariffs](https://pro.politico.eu/news/193300) — and it’s possible that business groups which suffer financial injury as a result will take legal action. It’s unlikely, however, that a judge would issue an immediate injunction against the tariffs. Any litigation would likely be drawn out. The U.S. Congress might also have the power to halt Trump’s trade war. On top of the doubtful justification that fentanyl and illegal immigration represent an economic emergency, the legislature has also delegated broad responsibility for trade policy to the president — it first did so to Franklin D. Roosevelt back in 1934 — and can take it back. But with both the Senate and the House of Representatives under Republican control, a major rift would have to open up on trade to stop him in his tracks. And that looks unlikely right now. Then there’s the World Trade Organization — a global body created 30 years ago to act as an umpire in trade disputes. [It’s currently unable to fulfil that role](https://www.politico.eu/article/reform-die-usa-washington-world-trade-organization-wto-ngozi-okonjo-iweala-joe-biden/), however, after both Trump and Biden blocked the appointment of judges to its Appellate Body, or highest court of appeal. ### The bottom line For Trump there are no rules. It’s the law of the jungle out there. So unless there is a strong political or judicial backlash in the United States against his trade war, he will be hard to stop. Then again, he might just do a deal. This story has been updated. Advertisement Related Tags [Aluminum](https://www.politico.eu/tag/aluminium/) [Americas](https://www.politico.eu/tag/americas/) [Anti-coercion instrument](https://www.politico.eu/tag/anti-coercion-instrument/) [Appellate Body](https://www.politico.eu/tag/appellate-body/) [Armaments](https://www.politico.eu/tag/armaments/) [Borders](https://www.politico.eu/tag/borders/) [Cars](https://www.politico.eu/tag/cars/) [Companies](https://www.politico.eu/tag/companies/) [Conflict](https://www.politico.eu/tag/conflict/) [Courts](https://www.politico.eu/tag/courts-2/) [Currencies](https://www.politico.eu/tag/currencies/) [Defense](https://www.politico.eu/tag/defense/) [Dumping/Duties](https://www.politico.eu/tag/dumpingduties/) [Electric vehicles](https://www.politico.eu/tag/electric-vehicles/) [Employment](https://www.politico.eu/tag/employment/) [Energy](https://www.politico.eu/tag/energy/) [Growth](https://www.politico.eu/tag/growth/) [Immigration](https://www.politico.eu/tag/immigration/) [Imports](https://www.politico.eu/tag/imports/) [Inflation](https://www.politico.eu/tag/inflation/) [Investment](https://www.politico.eu/tag/investment/) [Liquefied natural gas](https://www.politico.eu/tag/liquefied-natural-gas/) [Markets](https://www.politico.eu/tag/stock-markets/) [Overcapacity](https://www.politico.eu/tag/overcapacity/) [Policy](https://www.politico.eu/tag/policy/) [Rights](https://www.politico.eu/tag/rights/) [Sanctions](https://www.politico.eu/tag/sanctions/) [Services](https://www.politico.eu/tag/services/) [Steel](https://www.politico.eu/tag/steel/) [Supply chains](https://www.politico.eu/tag/supply-chains/) [Tariffs](https://www.politico.eu/tag/tariffs/) [Tax](https://www.politico.eu/tag/taxation/) [Trade](https://www.politico.eu/tag/trade/) [Trade war](https://www.politico.eu/tag/trade-war/) [U.S. economy](https://www.politico.eu/tag/u-s-economy/) [War](https://www.politico.eu/tag/war/) Related Countries [Canada](https://www.politico.eu/country/canada/) [China](https://www.politico.eu/country/china/) [Denmark](https://www.politico.eu/country/denmark/) [Greenland](https://www.politico.eu/country/greenland/) [Mexico](https://www.politico.eu/country/mexico/) [Russia](https://www.politico.eu/country/russia/) [Taiwan](https://www.politico.eu/country/taiwan/) [Ukraine](https://www.politico.eu/country/ukraine/) [United States](https://www.politico.eu/country/united-states/) [Vietnam](https://www.politico.eu/country/vietnam/) Related People [Donald Trump](https://www.politico.eu/person/donald-trump/) [Joe Biden](https://www.politico.eu/person/joe-biden/) [Vladimir Putin](https://www.politico.eu/person/vladimir-putin/) Related Organizations [Federal Reserve](https://www.politico.eu/eu-institution/federal-reserve/) ## Our readers read next ![UK officials saw ‘no need’ to vet Peter Mandelson, sacked Olly Robbins claims](https://www.politico.eu/cdn-cgi/image/width=380,height=253,quality=80,onerror=redirect,format=auto/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/21/GettyImages-1130400161-scaled.jpg) ## [UK officials saw ‘no need’ to vet Peter Mandelson, sacked Olly Robbins claims](https://www.politico.eu/article/uk-officials-saw-no-need-vet-peter-mandelson-sacked-olly-robbins-claims/) 54 MINS ago 4 mins read ![EU top court strikes down Hungary’s anti-LGBTQ+ rules](https://www.politico.eu/cdn-cgi/image/width=380,height=253,quality=80,onerror=redirect,format=auto/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/21/GettyImages-2238754753.jpg) ## [EU top court strikes down Hungary’s anti-LGBTQ+ rules](https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-top-court-strikes-down-hungarys-anti-lgbtq-rules/) 1 HR ago 3 mins read ![Why early action matters for cardiovascular health](https://www.politico.eu/cdn-cgi/image/width=380,height=214,quality=80,onerror=redirect,format=auto/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/17/Shot-of-a-doctor-showing-a-patient-information-1.jpeg) SPONSORED CONTENT FROM SANOFI ## [Why early action matters for cardiovascular health](https://www.politico.eu/sponsored-content/why-early-action-matters-for-cardiovascular-health/) 5 HRS ago 6 mins read ![No Orbán, no excuses](https://www.politico.eu/cdn-cgi/image/width=380,height=214,quality=80,onerror=redirect,format=auto/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/26/Brussels-Playbook-Podcast_featured-image-updated-26-Feb-2026.png) Podcast ## [No Orbán, no excuses](https://www.politico.eu/podcast/brussels-playbook-podcast/no-orban-no-excuses/) 6 HRS ago 2 mins read ## More from Douglas Busvine ![WTO meeting ends with no deal](https://www.politico.eu/cdn-cgi/image/width=380,height=253,quality=80,onerror=redirect,format=auto/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/30/GettyImages-2266836236-scaled.jpg) ## [WTO meeting ends with no deal](https://www.politico.eu/article/wto-meeting-ends-with-no-deal/) “We have run out of time,” says Director-General Ngozi Okonjo Iweala. Mar 30 3 mins read ![Brussels to finally adopt ‘Made in Europe’ act after yet another rehash](https://www.politico.eu/cdn-cgi/image/width=380,height=253,quality=80,onerror=redirect,format=auto/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/03/GettyImages-1232618760-scaled.jpg) ## [Brussels to finally adopt ‘Made in Europe’ act after yet another rehash](https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-commission-to-adopt-industry-act-on-wednesday/) Industrial Accelerator Act finally lands after suffering repeated delays and undergoing yet more revisions. Mar 3 3 mins read ![EU-Mercosur mega trade deal: The winners and losers](https://www.politico.eu/cdn-cgi/image/width=380,height=285,quality=80,onerror=redirect,format=auto/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/09/WhatsApp-Image-2026-01-09-at-4.36.10-PM.jpeg) ## [EU-Mercosur mega trade deal: The winners and losers](https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-mercosur-trade-deal-the-winners-and-losers/) POLITICO analyzes who is uncorking the Malbec — and who is crying into their Bordeaux (cough, Emmanuel Macron, cough). Jan 9 8 mins read ![Europe’s year of Trump trade trauma](https://www.politico.eu/cdn-cgi/image/width=380,height=253,quality=80,onerror=redirect,format=auto/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/22/GettyImages-2208000048.jpg) ## [Europe’s year of Trump trade trauma](https://www.politico.eu/article/europe-year-of-us-donald-trump-trade-trauma-eu-von-der-leyen/) The U.S. president hurled a nonstop barrage of abuse at Europe in 2025. The EU had to suck it up — and do a one-sided trade deal. Dec 24 7 mins read - - [Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/POLITICOeu/) - [Twitter](https://twitter.com/POLITICOEurope) - [YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWMhlrCnmb14IkQBfiSXktA) - [App Store](https://apps.apple.com/be/app/politico-pro-europe/id1396447664) - [Play Store](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=eu.politico.promobile&hl=en_UK) - - [Policy](https://www.politico.eu/section/policy/) - [Agriculture and Food](https://www.politico.eu/section/agriculture/) - [Central Banker](https://www.politico.eu/section/central-banker/) - [Competition and Industrial Policy](https://www.politico.eu/section/competition/) - [Cybersecurity and Data Protection](https://www.politico.eu/section/cybersecurity/) - [Defense](https://www.politico.eu/section/defense/) - [Energy and Climate](https://www.politico.eu/section/energy/) - [Energy and Climate UK](https://www.politico.eu/section/energy-uk/) - [Energie et Climat France](https://www.politico.eu/section/energy-fr/) - [Financial Services](https://www.politico.eu/section/financial-services/) - [Financial Services UK](https://www.politico.eu/section/financial-services-uk/) - [Gesundheit](https://www.politico.eu/politico-pro-gesundheit-newsletter-trial/) - [Health Care](https://www.politico.eu/section/health-care/) - [Industrie & Handel](https://www.politico.eu/section/industrie-handel/) - [Mobility](https://www.politico.eu/section/mobility/) - [Paris Influence](https://www.politico.eu/section/paris-influence/) - [Sustainability](https://www.politico.eu/section/sustainability/) - [Technology](https://www.politico.eu/section/technology/) - [Tech France](https://www.politico.eu/section/technology-fr/) - [Technologie & KI](https://www.politico.eu/politico-pro-technologie-newsletter-trial/) - [Technology UK](https://www.politico.eu/section/technology-uk/) - [Trade](https://www.politico.eu/section/trade/) - [Trade UK](https://www.politico.eu/section/trade-uk/) - - [Newsletters](https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/) - [Berlin Bulletin](https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/berlin-bulletin/) - [Berlin Playbook](https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/berlin-playbook/) - [Brussels Playbook](https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/brussels-playbook/) - [Dimanchissime](https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/dimanchissime/) - [EU Influence](https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/politico-brussels-influence/) - [Global Playbook](https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/global-playbook/) - [Global Policy Lab: Living Cities](https://www.politico.eu/livingcities/) - [Global Security](https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/global-security/) - [London Influence](https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/politico-london-influence/) - [London Playbook](https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/london-playbook/) - [Le Weekly](https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/le-weekly/) - [Playbook Paris](https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/playbook-paris/) - [POLITICO Confidential](https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/politico-confidential/) - [Sunday Crunch](https://www.politico.eu/newsletter/sunday-crunch/) - - [Podcasts](https://www.politico.eu/podcast) - [Brussels Playbook Podcast](https://www.politico.eu/podcast/brussels-playbook-podcast/) - [Westminster Insider](https://www.politico.eu/podcast/westminster-insider/) - [Politics at Sam and Anne's](https://www.politico.eu/podcast/politics-at-jack-and-sams/) - [Berlin Playbook — Der Podcast](https://www.politico.eu/podcast/berlin-playbook-podcast/) - [Power & Policy](https://www.politico.eu/podcast/power-and-policy/) - [Inside AfD](https://www.politico.eu/podcast/inside-afd/) - [Opinion](https://www.politico.eu/section/opinion/) - [All Opinion](https://www.politico.eu/section/opinion/) - [Beyond the Bubble](https://www.politico.eu/tag/beyond-the-bubble/) - [Germany Interpreted](https://www.politico.eu/tag/germany-interpreted/) - [Declassified](https://www.politico.eu/tag/declassified/) - [From Across the Pond](https://www.politico.eu/tag/from-across-the-pond/) - [Unpacked](https://www.politico.eu/tag/unpacked/) - - [Featured Series](https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they/) - [Danish Presidency of the EU](https://www.politico.eu/special-report/danish-presidency-of-the-eu-special-report/) - [Europe’s looming water crisis](https://www.politico.eu/europe-water-crisis-resilience-strategy-eu-commission/) - [Polish Presidency of the EU](https://www.politico.eu/special-report/polish-presidency-of-the-eu-special-report/) - [A global emergency: Tackling antimicrobial resistance](https://www.politico.eu/health-care-special-report-global-emergency-amr-antimicrobial-resistance/) - [Living Cities](https://www.politico.eu/livingcities/) - [POLITICO 28](https://www.politico.eu/politico-28-class-of-2026/) - [Subscriptions](https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they/) - [POLITICO Pro](https://www.politico.eu/pro/) - [Print Edition](https://www.politico.eu/politico-print-edition/) - [Research and analysis division](https://www.politico.eu/research-analysis-division/) - [Editions](https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they/) - [POLITICO Europe](https://www.politico.eu/) - [POLITICO UK](https://www.politico.eu/uk/) - [POLITICO France](https://www.politico.eu/france-politics-news/) - [POLITICO Germany](https://www.politico.eu/tag/german-politics/) - [POLITICO US](https://www.politico.com/) - [Manage Privacy Settings](https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they/) - [About us](https://www.politico.eu/about-us) - [Contact us](https://www.politico.eu/contact-us) - [Privacy Policy](https://www.politico.eu/privacy-policy/) - [Cookie Policy](https://www.politico.eu/cookies-info/) - [Media Solutions](https://www.politico.eu/media-solutions) - [Research and Analysis Division](https://www.politico.eu/research-analysis-division/) - [Agency IQ](https://www.agencyiq.com/) - [Press](https://www.politico.eu/press) - [Print Edition](https://www.politico.eu/politico-print-edition/) - [Careers at POLITICO](https://www.politico.eu/careers) - [Ts\&Cs](https://www.politico.eu/terms-conditions/) - [FAQs](https://www.politico.eu/frequently-asked-questions/)
Readable Markdown	1. [News](https://www.politico.eu/news) 2. [Trade](https://www.politico.eu/section/trade/) How do tariffs actually work? How far will this conflict escalate? Can Europe escape? We answer all your burning questions. AI generated Text-to-speech - [Copy Link Copied](https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they/ "Copy Link") - [Share via email](https://www.politico.eu/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#625d000d061b5f0a161612114751234750244750241515154c120d0e0b160b010d4c07174750240310160b010e07475024060d0c030e064f1610170f124f11031b114f16100306074f150310114f0310074f0703111b4f160d4f150b0c4f0310074f160a071b475024444152515a59111700080701165f260d0c030e064750523610170f1247505211031b114750521610030607475052150310114750520310074750520703111b475052160d475052150b0c4c4750522b11475052160a031647505216101707475124 "EMail") - [Share on X](https://x.com/intent/post/?url=https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they/&text=Donald%20Trump%20says%20trade%20wars%20are%20easy%20to%20win.%20Is%20that%20true%3F "X") - [Share on WhatsApp](https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=Donald%20Trump%20says%20trade%20wars%20are%20easy%20to%20win.%20Is%20that%20true%3F%20https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they/ "WhatsApp") - [Share on LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they/&title=Donald%20Trump%20says%20trade%20wars%20are%20easy%20to%20win.%20Is%20that%20true%3F&summary=Donald%20Trump%20says%20trade%20wars%20are%20easy%20to%20win.%20Is%20that%20true%3F&source=https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they/ "Linkedin") [Free article usually reserved for subscribers](https://www.politico.eu/pro/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they/) ![US-POLITICS-TRUMP-WEALTH-FUND](https://www.politico.eu/cdn-cgi/image/width=1160,height=773,quality=80,onerror=redirect,format=auto/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/03/trump-scaled.jpg) Trump affirme vouloir utiliser l’arme des droits de douane pour stopper le flux de fentanyl et de migrants illégaux aux frontières nord et sud des Etats-Unis. \\| Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images This article is also available in: [French](https://www.politico.eu/article/les-guerres-commerciales-sont-elles-si-faciles-a-gagner-comme-laffirme-trump/) February 3, 2025 7:50 pm CET By [Douglas Busvine](https://www.politico.eu/author/doug-busvine/) BERLIN — Donald Trump makes light of trade wars, claiming they are [easy to win](https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-trade-wars-are-good/). We’re about to find out if he’s right. The U.S. president has imposed tariffs of 10 percent on China from Tuesday, while Mexico and Canada won [last-minute stays of execution](https://www.politico.com/news/2025/02/03/canada-tarriff-paused-trudeau-trump-00202212) on 25 percent tariffs. He’s also threatening to [hit the European Union](https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-trade-war-eu-tariffs-mexico-canada/) — a major exporter of cars, medicines and food to the United States. Trump says he wants to use the tariff weapon to halt the flow of fentanyl and illegal migrants across the northern and southern borders of the United States. To do so he has invoked emergency powers — even though the U.S. economy is growing strongly and is at full employment. Advertisement He also wants to close the \$1 trillion U.S. trade deficit with the rest of the world. Team Trump argues that [throwing up a tariff wall](https://www.politico.com/news/2024/11/12/lighthizer-trump-new-tariff-plan-00189114) will force companies to move investment and jobs back to the U.S. — think of all those silicon chips now made in Taiwan or iPhones made in China. But critics warn that Trump’s trade war will [result in higher prices](https://www.politico.com/news/2025/02/02/summers-tariffs-self-inflicted-wound-american-economy-00201978), lower growth, lost jobs and disrupted supply chains — both at home and abroad. They also argue that tariffs are the wrong tool to fix a trade deficit caused by America’s borrowing and consumption habits. Here’s what Trump’s trade war is all about: ### What’s a trade war? First up, a trade war isn’t an actual war: It’s a conflict that results when one side feels that a trading relationship is unfair. Let’s say you flood my market with cheap steel, at prices below the cost of production. Companies in my country are going to the wall. They are laying off workers. My voters. That’s dumping and, under the rules of global trade, I can retaliate by imposing tariffs on your steel. For a trade conflict like this to turn into a trade war, things need to escalate. And that’s what is happening here: Trump is still threatening to hit America’s closest trading partners with tariffs on pretty much everything. That means we could be about to embark on the biggest trade war since the 1930s. ### How do tariffs work? Trump claims that his new tariffs will make Americans rich — he’s even promised to set up a new [External Revenue Service](https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/01/14/congress/trump-to-create-external-revenue-service-for-tariffs-00198155) to collect all the revenues that they throw off. He also says foreign companies will pay them and that they won’t hurt U.S. consumers. Advertisement That’s not how they work, however. Tariffs are a tax that is paid by the importer at the border. If they go up, the importer faces a choice — to pass on the price increase to the consumer, or to accept a squeeze on their profit margins. Price increases from Trump’s across-the-board tariffs would show up immediately in consumer inflation, economists say. And although he has promised to offset their impact with tax cuts elsewhere, there is no sign of that happening yet. As for the potential revenue from tariffs, Trump likes to [hark back to the late 19th century](https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113755116467958801), when tariffs accounted for over half of U.S. federal revenues. But that was before income tax — which today supports a government much larger in relation to the overall economy. There is just no way that tariff revenues can pay for a modern state. ### When was the last trade war? In [Trump’s first term](https://www.politico.com/story/2018/03/01/trump-steel-tariffs-432143). He imposed 25 percent duties on steel and 10 percent on aluminum in 2018 — while the European Union responded by slapping \$6 billion in tariffs on Harley Davidson motorbikes, Levi’s jeans and bourbon. Trump threatened to escalate by hitting imports of European cars — but [it never came to that](https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/19/trump-auto-tariff-commerce-hearing-698100). Eventually, the tariffs were suspended by both sides. The EU [truce expires](https://www.politico.eu/article/brussels-to-announce-us-tariffs-truce-monday/) at the end of March, meaning that even if Trump doesn’t hit Europe with tariffs now, their trade dispute could still get out of hand. The clearest precedent is likely the so-called Nixon shock of 1971. The starting point was comparable to today: The costs of the Vietnam War and of the Great Society policies of the 1960s had tipped the United States from surplus into deficit. Advertisement In an attempt to restore the balance, President Richard Nixon abolished the gold standard — forcing the trading partners of the U.S. to revalue their currencies. He ordered a 90-day freeze on wages and prices. And he imposed a 10 percent import tax. Nixon’s actions are considered to have been a political success but an economic failure. The import tax was scrapped within months. And the U.S. economy struggled for years with stagflation — a combination of low growth and high inflation — that was only squeezed out of the system in the 1980s by Federal Reserve Chair Paul Volcker’s tough monetary policies. ### Who is the real enemy? China. Although Trump has only threatened to hit China with tariffs of 10 percent, the tariffs still hanging over Canada and Mexico are indirectly aimed at Beijing. That’s because, under the USMCA trade accord (the successor to NAFTA), Chinese companies — e.g. makers of electric vehicles — would normally enjoy duty-free access to the U.S. market if they locate production in North America. In recent years there has been bipartisan consensus in Washington on the need to fight back against China and its economic model, which has created vast industrial overcapacity and has flooded world markets with surplus production. Since taking office, however, Trump has dialed back the rhetoric, saying he just wants a “fair” trading relationship with China. One thing to watch: Will Trump drop the tariffs against America’s allies if [they agree to align with the United States](https://www.politico.eu/article/fear-and-loathing-in-davos-eu-frets-about-its-lose-lose-choice-between-trumps-us-and-xis-china/) in shutting out China? That’s one straw [the European Union is clutching at](https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-donald-turmp-maros-sefcovic-ursula-von-der-leyen-lets-deal/) in the hope of keeping the transatlantic peace. Advertisement ### How far can this escalate? Trump, in his second incarnation as U.S. president, has shown no inhibitions in questioning the territorial integrity of other nations — jibing that Canada [should become the 51st U.S. state](https://www.politico.eu/article/us-donald-trump-says-great-idea-to-make-canada-the-51st-state-justin-trudeau/) or [staking a claim to Greenland](https://www.politico.eu/article/us-donald-trump-greenland-russia-china/), a protectorate of EU member Denmark. A greater concern is that, in playing fast and loose with international law, Trump is playing into the hands of leaders — like Russia’s Vladimir Putin — who want to overturn the status quo. In a world where multiple fires are burning, Trump is liberally splashing gasoline and tossing matches to start new ones. ### Can Europe escape Trump’s wrath? The U.S. president has been amping up his rhetoric, on Sunday night [calling the EU an “atrocity.](https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-trade-tariffs-says-eu-is-an-atrocity/)” Brussels is desperate to engage, offering to buy more U.S. [liquefied natural gas](https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-ready-to-negotiate-donald-trump-boost-gas-import/) or [weapons](https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-defense-summit-buying-us-weapons-donald-trump-ukraine-war-council-emmanuel-macron-antonio-costa/) as Trump presses European governments to spend more on defense. Last time, Brussels answered Trump’s steel and aluminum tariffs by retaliating against motorbikes, jeans and bourbon — measures targeted to cause maximum pain in Republican strongholds. The EU could do the same again — or [wield its trade “bazooka,”](https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-export-import-lng-fight-donald-trump-us-trade-war-wto-anti-coercion-instrument-subsidies/) the anti-coercion instrument, which would put retaliation on a stronger legal footing. Experts worry, though, that the anti-coercion instrument may be too slow, because it foresees a period of consultation before action. The EU needs a new, bigger bazooka that can be fired in real time, they argue. ### Can Trump be stopped? Trump is, for the first time, invoking emergency powers under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), so far only used by Joe Biden to impose sanctions against Russia over Putin’s war against Ukraine. Advertisement The IEEPA [hasn’t yet been used to justify tariffs](https://pro.politico.eu/news/193300) — and it’s possible that business groups which suffer financial injury as a result will take legal action. It’s unlikely, however, that a judge would issue an immediate injunction against the tariffs. Any litigation would likely be drawn out. The U.S. Congress might also have the power to halt Trump’s trade war. On top of the doubtful justification that fentanyl and illegal immigration represent an economic emergency, the legislature has also delegated broad responsibility for trade policy to the president — it first did so to Franklin D. Roosevelt back in 1934 — and can take it back. But with both the Senate and the House of Representatives under Republican control, a major rift would have to open up on trade to stop him in his tracks. And that looks unlikely right now. Then there’s the World Trade Organization — a global body created 30 years ago to act as an umpire in trade disputes. [It’s currently unable to fulfil that role](https://www.politico.eu/article/reform-die-usa-washington-world-trade-organization-wto-ngozi-okonjo-iweala-joe-biden/), however, after both Trump and Biden blocked the appointment of judges to its Appellate Body, or highest court of appeal. ### The bottom line For Trump there are no rules. It’s the law of the jungle out there. So unless there is a strong political or judicial backlash in the United States against his trade war, he will be hard to stop. Then again, he might just do a deal. This story has been updated. Advertisement
Shard	137 (laksa)
Root Hash	15364017793929463337
Unparsed URL	eu,politico!www,/article/donald-trump-says-trade-wars-are-easy-to-win-are-they/ s443