âšď¸ Skipped - page is already crawled
| Filter | Status | Condition | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| HTTP status | PASS | download_http_code = 200 | HTTP 200 |
| Age cutoff | PASS | download_stamp > now() - 6 MONTH | 0.2 months ago |
| History drop | PASS | isNull(history_drop_reason) | No drop reason |
| Spam/ban | PASS | fh_dont_index != 1 AND ml_spam_score = 0 | ml_spam_score=0 |
| Canonical | PASS | meta_canonical IS NULL OR = '' OR = src_unparsed | Not set |
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| URL | https://www.pantsuitpoliticsshow.com/p/10-things-i-learned-from-elon-musk |
| Last Crawled | 2026-04-07 16:11:49 (6 days ago) |
| First Indexed | 2025-03-14 17:11:38 (1 year ago) |
| HTTP Status Code | 200 |
| Meta Title | 10 Things I Learned from Elon Musk and Joe Rogan |
| Meta Description | 3 hours and 19 minutes that I found both insulting and inspiring |
| Meta Canonical | null |
| Boilerpipe Text | On February 28, The Joe Rogan Experience published a 3-hour and 19-minute interview with Elon Musk. I read lots of coverage of the conversation and decided to spend a long drive this weekend listening. Like it or not (and I donât), these are the two most powerful men in media and two of the most powerful men in American politics. So, I fired up their conversation as I pulled out of my driveway and tried to listen with an open mind.
What I heard was equal parts insulting and inspiring to me as a podcaster and a person who cares about politics. Here are my takeaways.
Insulting
#1 - No one does any homework of any kind.
I spend a tremendous amount of time thinking about what it means to respect the audience in podcasting. How do you maintain the free-form spirit that makes podcasts interesting while also sharing ideas and information in a considered way? This is a tough balance, and I donât think anyone (especially me) nails it with consistency. That said, if Sarah and I spoke the way that Joe Rogan and Elon Musk spokeâif we said the exact words these two exchangedâwe would be universally criticized as unprepared and uninformed. âHalf-bakedâ is a generous descriptor for every single topic discussed over the course of the 3 hours and 19 minutes.
#2 - âThe media liesâ is the thesis statement and all of the supporting evidence.
I guess no one does homework because nothing is believable. If you track the logic of everything Rogan and Musk discussedâsex robots, Jeffrey Epstein, USAID âit all rests on a foundational belief that we canât believe anything that comes from established media or their liberal conspirators. A post on X is always more credible than a story printed in a major newspaper. Nothing is reliable, except what maybe piques their interest.
#3 - Incredulity is intellectual.
Best I can tell, Roganâs job on his show is to say,
âWHAT? Thatâs so crazy. Itâs totally insane.â
Everything Elon Musk said to Rogan was taken as a profound statement of fact about a baffling world. Musk pulled percentages out of thin air (the government might be 5-10% good, but is 90, 95% ânotâ; âillegalsâ in swing states have âlike a 80% likelihood of voting Dem;â generalized artificial intelligence is 80% likely to have a good outcome) and received no questions from Rogan about those numbers whatsoever. He said he had receipts to back up all of DOGEâs work; he certainly wasnât asked to produce them or provide any detail. The incredulity, the
âcan you believe people?â
posture is plenty.
#4 - The only world that matters exists online.
These guys are obsessed with internet controversies, internet takes, and internet stories. They spent lots of time playing with âunhinged Grok,â a version of Muskâs large language model that repeats every prompt sarcastically and then profanely insults the user. I donât know what is real to them. I donât know what they think about any of the issues that cause stress in my life and in the lives of people I see and love in my community. I donât understand a politics animated by the Hunter Biden laptop story or a conspiracy about Seth Rich or whether people misinterpreted Elonâs gesture at a rally.
#5
-
Everything is part heroâs journey, part joke.
I guess itâs not true to say
âI donât know what is real to them.â
Clearly, they are real to themselves. They are clear and compelling in telling the story of how the public talks to and about them. They want to be heroes of speech, of industry, of uncovering great and deliberately-suppressed plots by other wealthy and powerful people. And they want to be entertained. Whether they were calling Social Security a Ponzi scheme or accusing Democrats of âimporting votersâ or discussing how Elon âcanât push too hard on the corruption stuff because itâs gonna get me killed,â you could always hear a little bit of a punchline. Itâs all a little amusing to them, and if itâs not amusing, itâs not worth their attention.
Inspiring:
#6 - Theyâre having fun.
I donât like people spreading garbage information and bad ideas from positions of power because it amuses them. I
do
think thereâs a lesson in how much fun they have. Joe Rogan and Elon Musk spent much of this conversation in fits of giggles. Iâm not using the word âgigglesâ pejoratively; itâs just descriptive. Theyâre having fun, and fun is attractive. People want and desire more fun in all areas of their lives. They want more lightness. They want to relieve some pressure. Even some gallows humor helps. I listened to this conversation, and it reflected back to me how self-serious I can be. It reflected back to me why we so frequently hear from people, âI love you guys, but I need a break from news and politics.â There is a way to have fun and still take the world seriously, and I want to work on that balance in myself.
#7 - Theyâre not worried about screwing up.
It frustrated me that Musk and Rogan were so obviously unprepared to talk to each other. At the same time, it is refreshing to listen to people who are willing to guess, willing to use not quite the right word (and I mean just that; I do not mean
deliberately using offensive words to trigger the libs
). I worry constantly about everything and everyone listening. While thereâs some strength and care in that, thereâs also a lot of limitation. I also want to work on this balance in myself.
#8 - Thereâs a lot to be said for range in conversations.
It is disorienting to go from a conversation about Avatar depression (which I learned is a sadness some people feel after watching the movies and wishing they could live in Pandora) to genetically engineering super-viruses to fraud and abuse in government spending to alien life forms. There is also a vulnerability in just following the conversational loop, which is rare in media but relatable in life. I want to talk to my friends about Avatar depression and super-viruses and fraud and abuse in government spending, and then I want to come back to alien life forms. Being willing to
go there
, wherever âthereâ is, lets people know who you are. Thatâs why Iâm proud when Sarah and I can say we had a âcharacteristically wide-rangingâ discussion. Itâs why we end every episode outside of politics and why we donât hesitate to tell a seemingly unrelated story from our lives in the middle of a policy discussion. I think we have even more room with each other and definitely with our guests to
go there
and let âthereâ be more expansive. I want to be willing to do it myself, and I want to have people join us who are willing to do it with us.
#9 - They have a massive capacity for risk.
It surprised me that Joe and Elon were willing to claim so much responsibility for Trumpâs win. Anyone who has studied the President knows that he doesnât like to share credit. It felt risky for them to say that it mattered that Rogan had Trump on the podcast right before the election, to talk about how Elonâs money and campaigning in Pennsylvania mattered. But that aligns with what I know about them. Say what you will about Elon Musk; he has a high risk tolerance. He will pursue goals without feeling constrained by consequences. I am concerned about how heâs doing that in government. I am simultaneously pushing myself to ask what I believe in enough to take risks around. What would I do in pursuit of an America without homelessness? What fallout would I endure to ensure that people receive loving, responsible care in their final years of life? What would I break to provide loving, responsible child care for all families? I donât want to be reckless, but I listen to them and realize thatâs not my risk. My risk is not being willing to leave it all on the field for what I believe matters.
#10 - There is no barrier to entry with them.
I donât want to say that this conversation felt
inclusive
. Thatâs a) inaccurate and b) a word theyâd (hilariously) find offensive. It was accessible. I didnât need to know any acronyms. I didnât really need to follow the extremely-online-meme-culture that they so enjoy. I didnât need backstories. I didnât need expertise. I think Joe Rogan is so successful because he consistently creates âpull up a chairâ conditions. I think MAGA has been successful for similar reasons. Thereâs an immediate sense that if youâre listening, youâre in on the joke. Youâre with us. Youâve already done something brave by opting out of the mainstream. I think they create a feeling of belonging at massive scale. I donât like the way they do it, and I donât like what it produces. But Iâm going to be thinking for a long time about what a healthy version of belonging at massive scale might look like.
I did not enjoy this episode. The time did not fly. I did remember why I love podcasts and how powerful they are. I learned some things about myself and how I approach both podcasting and politics. I found it to be a pretty rich text as I try to navigate this moment in American history.
Leave a comment
Since the theme for this weekâs newsletter is podcasting, Sarah and Beth shared their thoughts on Gavin Newsomeâs new podcast âThis is Gavin Newsomeâ and his headturning guests on our bonus episode of Pantsuit Politics this week. It was spicy, as advertised.
Share
Sarah:
Careless People: A Cautionary Tale of Power, Greed, and Lost Idealism
by Sarah Wynn-Williams
Beth:
DOGE Makes Its Latest Errors Harder to Find
(The New York Times)
Alise:
Severance
(Apple TV). Please join her in the chat for all the Severance talk.
Maggie:
âYouâve Blown a Hole in the Familyâ: Inside the Murdochsâ Succession Drama
(The New York Times Magazine)
Note: I did not watch Succession, but if the writers had come up with this, they would have been like âwe have to tone it down, no one will ever believe thatâ
Thanks for reading Pantsuit Politics! This post is public, so feel free to share it.
Share
Copyright (C) 2024 Pantsuit Politics. All rights reserved. |
| Markdown | [](https://www.pantsuitpoliticsshow.com/)
# [](https://www.pantsuitpoliticsshow.com/)
Subscribe
Sign in
[Newsletter](https://www.pantsuitpoliticsshow.com/s/newsletter/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=menu)
# 10 Things I Learned from Elon Musk and Joe Rogan
### 3 hours and 19 minutes that I found both insulting and inspiring
[](https://substack.com/@bethsilvers)
[Beth Silvers](https://substack.com/@bethsilvers)
Mar 14, 2025
121
38
6
Share
On February 28, The Joe Rogan Experience published a 3-hour and 19-minute interview with Elon Musk. I read lots of coverage of the conversation and decided to spend a long drive this weekend listening. Like it or not (and I donât), these are the two most powerful men in media and two of the most powerful men in American politics. So, I fired up their conversation as I pulled out of my driveway and tried to listen with an open mind.
[](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!vXML!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fc9e7c64a-40ea-4a8a-893b-5f4f28949a28_1170x618.jpeg)
What I heard was equal parts insulting and inspiring to me as a podcaster and a person who cares about politics. Here are my takeaways.
**Insulting**
**\#1 - No one does any homework of any kind.** I spend a tremendous amount of time thinking about what it means to respect the audience in podcasting. How do you maintain the free-form spirit that makes podcasts interesting while also sharing ideas and information in a considered way? This is a tough balance, and I donât think anyone (especially me) nails it with consistency. That said, if Sarah and I spoke the way that Joe Rogan and Elon Musk spokeâif we said the exact words these two exchangedâwe would be universally criticized as unprepared and uninformed. âHalf-bakedâ is a generous descriptor for every single topic discussed over the course of the 3 hours and 19 minutes.
**\#2 - âThe media liesâ is the thesis statement and all of the supporting evidence.** I guess no one does homework because nothing is believable. If you track the logic of everything Rogan and Musk discussedâsex robots, Jeffrey Epstein, USAID âit all rests on a foundational belief that we canât believe anything that comes from established media or their liberal conspirators. A post on X is always more credible than a story printed in a major newspaper. Nothing is reliable, except what maybe piques their interest.
**\#3 - Incredulity is intellectual.** Best I can tell, Roganâs job on his show is to say, *âWHAT? Thatâs so crazy. Itâs totally insane.â* Everything Elon Musk said to Rogan was taken as a profound statement of fact about a baffling world. Musk pulled percentages out of thin air (the government might be 5-10% good, but is 90, 95% ânotâ; âillegalsâ in swing states have âlike a 80% likelihood of voting Dem;â generalized artificial intelligence is 80% likely to have a good outcome) and received no questions from Rogan about those numbers whatsoever. He said he had receipts to back up all of DOGEâs work; he certainly wasnât asked to produce them or provide any detail. The incredulity, the *âcan you believe people?â* posture is plenty.
**\#4 - The only world that matters exists online.** These guys are obsessed with internet controversies, internet takes, and internet stories. They spent lots of time playing with âunhinged Grok,â a version of Muskâs large language model that repeats every prompt sarcastically and then profanely insults the user. I donât know what is real to them. I donât know what they think about any of the issues that cause stress in my life and in the lives of people I see and love in my community. I donât understand a politics animated by the Hunter Biden laptop story or a conspiracy about Seth Rich or whether people misinterpreted Elonâs gesture at a rally.
**\#5** \- **Everything is part heroâs journey, part joke.** I guess itâs not true to say *âI donât know what is real to them.â* Clearly, they are real to themselves. They are clear and compelling in telling the story of how the public talks to and about them. They want to be heroes of speech, of industry, of uncovering great and deliberately-suppressed plots by other wealthy and powerful people. And they want to be entertained. Whether they were calling Social Security a Ponzi scheme or accusing Democrats of âimporting votersâ or discussing how Elon âcanât push too hard on the corruption stuff because itâs gonna get me killed,â you could always hear a little bit of a punchline. Itâs all a little amusing to them, and if itâs not amusing, itâs not worth their attention.
**Inspiring:**
**\#6 - Theyâre having fun.** I donât like people spreading garbage information and bad ideas from positions of power because it amuses them. I *do* think thereâs a lesson in how much fun they have. Joe Rogan and Elon Musk spent much of this conversation in fits of giggles. Iâm not using the word âgigglesâ pejoratively; itâs just descriptive. Theyâre having fun, and fun is attractive. People want and desire more fun in all areas of their lives. They want more lightness. They want to relieve some pressure. Even some gallows humor helps. I listened to this conversation, and it reflected back to me how self-serious I can be. It reflected back to me why we so frequently hear from people, âI love you guys, but I need a break from news and politics.â There is a way to have fun and still take the world seriously, and I want to work on that balance in myself.
**\#7 - Theyâre not worried about screwing up.** It frustrated me that Musk and Rogan were so obviously unprepared to talk to each other. At the same time, it is refreshing to listen to people who are willing to guess, willing to use not quite the right word (and I mean just that; I do not mean *deliberately using offensive words to trigger the libs*). I worry constantly about everything and everyone listening. While thereâs some strength and care in that, thereâs also a lot of limitation. I also want to work on this balance in myself.
**\#8 - Thereâs a lot to be said for range in conversations.** It is disorienting to go from a conversation about Avatar depression (which I learned is a sadness some people feel after watching the movies and wishing they could live in Pandora) to genetically engineering super-viruses to fraud and abuse in government spending to alien life forms. There is also a vulnerability in just following the conversational loop, which is rare in media but relatable in life. I want to talk to my friends about Avatar depression and super-viruses and fraud and abuse in government spending, and then I want to come back to alien life forms. Being willing to *go there*, wherever âthereâ is, lets people know who you are. Thatâs why Iâm proud when Sarah and I can say we had a âcharacteristically wide-rangingâ discussion. Itâs why we end every episode outside of politics and why we donât hesitate to tell a seemingly unrelated story from our lives in the middle of a policy discussion. I think we have even more room with each other and definitely with our guests to *go there* and let âthereâ be more expansive. I want to be willing to do it myself, and I want to have people join us who are willing to do it with us.
**\#9 - They have a massive capacity for risk.** It surprised me that Joe and Elon were willing to claim so much responsibility for Trumpâs win. Anyone who has studied the President knows that he doesnât like to share credit. It felt risky for them to say that it mattered that Rogan had Trump on the podcast right before the election, to talk about how Elonâs money and campaigning in Pennsylvania mattered. But that aligns with what I know about them. Say what you will about Elon Musk; he has a high risk tolerance. He will pursue goals without feeling constrained by consequences. I am concerned about how heâs doing that in government. I am simultaneously pushing myself to ask what I believe in enough to take risks around. What would I do in pursuit of an America without homelessness? What fallout would I endure to ensure that people receive loving, responsible care in their final years of life? What would I break to provide loving, responsible child care for all families? I donât want to be reckless, but I listen to them and realize thatâs not my risk. My risk is not being willing to leave it all on the field for what I believe matters.
**\#10 - There is no barrier to entry with them.** I donât want to say that this conversation felt *inclusive*. Thatâs a) inaccurate and b) a word theyâd (hilariously) find offensive. It was accessible. I didnât need to know any acronyms. I didnât really need to follow the extremely-online-meme-culture that they so enjoy. I didnât need backstories. I didnât need expertise. I think Joe Rogan is so successful because he consistently creates âpull up a chairâ conditions. I think MAGA has been successful for similar reasons. Thereâs an immediate sense that if youâre listening, youâre in on the joke. Youâre with us. Youâve already done something brave by opting out of the mainstream. I think they create a feeling of belonging at massive scale. I donât like the way they do it, and I donât like what it produces. But Iâm going to be thinking for a long time about what a healthy version of belonging at massive scale might look like.
I did not enjoy this episode. The time did not fly. I did remember why I love podcasts and how powerful they are. I learned some things about myself and how I approach both podcasting and politics. I found it to be a pretty rich text as I try to navigate this moment in American history.
[Leave a comment](https://www.pantsuitpoliticsshow.com/p/10-things-i-learned-from-elon-musk/comments)
***
### More on the State of Political Podcasting
Since the theme for this weekâs newsletter is podcasting, Sarah and Beth shared their thoughts on Gavin Newsomeâs new podcast âThis is Gavin Newsomeâ and his headturning guests on our bonus episode of Pantsuit Politics this week. It was spicy, as advertised.
[Share](https://www.pantsuitpoliticsshow.com/p/10-things-i-learned-from-elon-musk?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email&utm_content=share&action=share)
***
#### Something Nice to Take You Into the Weekend
[betches\_news](https://instagram.com/betches_news)
[](https://instagram.com/p/DGQsFT4xtTm)
A post shared by [@betches\_news](https://instagram.com/betches_news)
***
#### What Weâre Reading and Listening To This Week
- **Sarah:** *[Careless People: A Cautionary Tale of Power, Greed, and Lost Idealism](https://a.co/d/eJvq4if)* [by Sarah Wynn-Williams](https://a.co/d/eJvq4if)
- **Beth:** [DOGE Makes Its Latest Errors Harder to Find](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/13/us/politics/doge-errors-funding-grants-claims.html) (The New York Times)
- **Alise:** [Severance](https://tv.apple.com/us/show/severance/umc.cmc.1srk2goyh2q2zdxcx605w8vtx) (Apple TV). Please join her in the chat for all the Severance talk.
- **Maggie:** [âYouâve Blown a Hole in the Familyâ: Inside the Murdochsâ Succession Drama](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/13/magazine/rupert-murdoch-succession-family-trust-fight.html) (The New York Times Magazine) *Note: I did not watch Succession, but if the writers had come up with this, they would have been like âwe have to tone it down, no one will ever believe thatâ*
Thanks for reading Pantsuit Politics! This post is public, so feel free to share it.
[Share](https://www.pantsuitpoliticsshow.com/p/10-things-i-learned-from-elon-musk?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email&utm_content=share&action=share)
*Copyright (C) 2024 Pantsuit Politics. All rights reserved.*
Pantsuit Politics is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
121
38
6
Share
Previous
Next
#### Discussion about this post
Comments
Restacks
[](https://substack.com/profile/36423472-lisa?utm_source=comment)
[Lisa](https://substack.com/profile/36423472-lisa?utm_source=substack-feed-item)
[Mar 14, 2025](https://www.pantsuitpoliticsshow.com/p/10-things-i-learned-from-elon-musk/comment/100484081 "Mar 14, 2025, 3:57 PM")
Liked by Beth Silvers
Whew, I appreciate you \*taking one for the team\*, Beth! Informative and definitely lots to ponder. As I approached the end of your points, one overwhelming thought kept resurfacing: white, male privilege. And, I don't write that lightly or flippantly. Barriers to entry, not caring if they mess up, etc. There is a confidence in them that I feel mostly comes from their belief that they are superior.
[Reply]()
[Share]()
[3 replies](https://www.pantsuitpoliticsshow.com/p/10-things-i-learned-from-elon-musk/comment/100484081)
[](https://substack.com/profile/205459249-katrina-mclaughlin?utm_source=comment)
[Katrina McLaughlin](https://substack.com/profile/205459249-katrina-mclaughlin?utm_source=substack-feed-item)
[Mar 15, 2025](https://www.pantsuitpoliticsshow.com/p/10-things-i-learned-from-elon-musk/comment/100626346 "Mar 15, 2025, 2:22 AM")
Liked by Beth Silvers
Between all of the work you did with Project 2025, and now this? You deserve allllll the virtual cobblers. We're thankful for you diving into the things we're all curious about, but can't handle diving into ourselves.
[Reply]()
[Share]()
[36 more comments...](https://www.pantsuitpoliticsshow.com/p/10-things-i-learned-from-elon-musk/comments)
Top
Latest
Discussions
No posts
### Ready for more?
Š 2026 Pantsuit Politics LLC ¡ [Privacy](https://substack.com/privacy) â [Terms](https://substack.com/tos) â [Collection notice](https://substack.com/ccpa#personal-data-collected)
[Start your Substack](https://substack.com/signup?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=web&utm_content=footer)
[Get the app](https://substack.com/app/app-store-redirect?utm_campaign=app-marketing&utm_content=web-footer-button)
[Substack](https://substack.com/) is the home for great culture
This site requires JavaScript to run correctly. Please [turn on JavaScript](https://enable-javascript.com/) or unblock scripts |
| Readable Markdown | On February 28, The Joe Rogan Experience published a 3-hour and 19-minute interview with Elon Musk. I read lots of coverage of the conversation and decided to spend a long drive this weekend listening. Like it or not (and I donât), these are the two most powerful men in media and two of the most powerful men in American politics. So, I fired up their conversation as I pulled out of my driveway and tried to listen with an open mind.
[](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!vXML!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fc9e7c64a-40ea-4a8a-893b-5f4f28949a28_1170x618.jpeg)
What I heard was equal parts insulting and inspiring to me as a podcaster and a person who cares about politics. Here are my takeaways.
**Insulting**
**\#1 - No one does any homework of any kind.** I spend a tremendous amount of time thinking about what it means to respect the audience in podcasting. How do you maintain the free-form spirit that makes podcasts interesting while also sharing ideas and information in a considered way? This is a tough balance, and I donât think anyone (especially me) nails it with consistency. That said, if Sarah and I spoke the way that Joe Rogan and Elon Musk spokeâif we said the exact words these two exchangedâwe would be universally criticized as unprepared and uninformed. âHalf-bakedâ is a generous descriptor for every single topic discussed over the course of the 3 hours and 19 minutes.
**\#2 - âThe media liesâ is the thesis statement and all of the supporting evidence.** I guess no one does homework because nothing is believable. If you track the logic of everything Rogan and Musk discussedâsex robots, Jeffrey Epstein, USAID âit all rests on a foundational belief that we canât believe anything that comes from established media or their liberal conspirators. A post on X is always more credible than a story printed in a major newspaper. Nothing is reliable, except what maybe piques their interest.
**\#3 - Incredulity is intellectual.** Best I can tell, Roganâs job on his show is to say, *âWHAT? Thatâs so crazy. Itâs totally insane.â* Everything Elon Musk said to Rogan was taken as a profound statement of fact about a baffling world. Musk pulled percentages out of thin air (the government might be 5-10% good, but is 90, 95% ânotâ; âillegalsâ in swing states have âlike a 80% likelihood of voting Dem;â generalized artificial intelligence is 80% likely to have a good outcome) and received no questions from Rogan about those numbers whatsoever. He said he had receipts to back up all of DOGEâs work; he certainly wasnât asked to produce them or provide any detail. The incredulity, the *âcan you believe people?â* posture is plenty.
**\#4 - The only world that matters exists online.** These guys are obsessed with internet controversies, internet takes, and internet stories. They spent lots of time playing with âunhinged Grok,â a version of Muskâs large language model that repeats every prompt sarcastically and then profanely insults the user. I donât know what is real to them. I donât know what they think about any of the issues that cause stress in my life and in the lives of people I see and love in my community. I donât understand a politics animated by the Hunter Biden laptop story or a conspiracy about Seth Rich or whether people misinterpreted Elonâs gesture at a rally.
**\#5** \- **Everything is part heroâs journey, part joke.** I guess itâs not true to say *âI donât know what is real to them.â* Clearly, they are real to themselves. They are clear and compelling in telling the story of how the public talks to and about them. They want to be heroes of speech, of industry, of uncovering great and deliberately-suppressed plots by other wealthy and powerful people. And they want to be entertained. Whether they were calling Social Security a Ponzi scheme or accusing Democrats of âimporting votersâ or discussing how Elon âcanât push too hard on the corruption stuff because itâs gonna get me killed,â you could always hear a little bit of a punchline. Itâs all a little amusing to them, and if itâs not amusing, itâs not worth their attention.
**Inspiring:**
**\#6 - Theyâre having fun.** I donât like people spreading garbage information and bad ideas from positions of power because it amuses them. I *do* think thereâs a lesson in how much fun they have. Joe Rogan and Elon Musk spent much of this conversation in fits of giggles. Iâm not using the word âgigglesâ pejoratively; itâs just descriptive. Theyâre having fun, and fun is attractive. People want and desire more fun in all areas of their lives. They want more lightness. They want to relieve some pressure. Even some gallows humor helps. I listened to this conversation, and it reflected back to me how self-serious I can be. It reflected back to me why we so frequently hear from people, âI love you guys, but I need a break from news and politics.â There is a way to have fun and still take the world seriously, and I want to work on that balance in myself.
**\#7 - Theyâre not worried about screwing up.** It frustrated me that Musk and Rogan were so obviously unprepared to talk to each other. At the same time, it is refreshing to listen to people who are willing to guess, willing to use not quite the right word (and I mean just that; I do not mean *deliberately using offensive words to trigger the libs*). I worry constantly about everything and everyone listening. While thereâs some strength and care in that, thereâs also a lot of limitation. I also want to work on this balance in myself.
**\#8 - Thereâs a lot to be said for range in conversations.** It is disorienting to go from a conversation about Avatar depression (which I learned is a sadness some people feel after watching the movies and wishing they could live in Pandora) to genetically engineering super-viruses to fraud and abuse in government spending to alien life forms. There is also a vulnerability in just following the conversational loop, which is rare in media but relatable in life. I want to talk to my friends about Avatar depression and super-viruses and fraud and abuse in government spending, and then I want to come back to alien life forms. Being willing to *go there*, wherever âthereâ is, lets people know who you are. Thatâs why Iâm proud when Sarah and I can say we had a âcharacteristically wide-rangingâ discussion. Itâs why we end every episode outside of politics and why we donât hesitate to tell a seemingly unrelated story from our lives in the middle of a policy discussion. I think we have even more room with each other and definitely with our guests to *go there* and let âthereâ be more expansive. I want to be willing to do it myself, and I want to have people join us who are willing to do it with us.
**\#9 - They have a massive capacity for risk.** It surprised me that Joe and Elon were willing to claim so much responsibility for Trumpâs win. Anyone who has studied the President knows that he doesnât like to share credit. It felt risky for them to say that it mattered that Rogan had Trump on the podcast right before the election, to talk about how Elonâs money and campaigning in Pennsylvania mattered. But that aligns with what I know about them. Say what you will about Elon Musk; he has a high risk tolerance. He will pursue goals without feeling constrained by consequences. I am concerned about how heâs doing that in government. I am simultaneously pushing myself to ask what I believe in enough to take risks around. What would I do in pursuit of an America without homelessness? What fallout would I endure to ensure that people receive loving, responsible care in their final years of life? What would I break to provide loving, responsible child care for all families? I donât want to be reckless, but I listen to them and realize thatâs not my risk. My risk is not being willing to leave it all on the field for what I believe matters.
**\#10 - There is no barrier to entry with them.** I donât want to say that this conversation felt *inclusive*. Thatâs a) inaccurate and b) a word theyâd (hilariously) find offensive. It was accessible. I didnât need to know any acronyms. I didnât really need to follow the extremely-online-meme-culture that they so enjoy. I didnât need backstories. I didnât need expertise. I think Joe Rogan is so successful because he consistently creates âpull up a chairâ conditions. I think MAGA has been successful for similar reasons. Thereâs an immediate sense that if youâre listening, youâre in on the joke. Youâre with us. Youâve already done something brave by opting out of the mainstream. I think they create a feeling of belonging at massive scale. I donât like the way they do it, and I donât like what it produces. But Iâm going to be thinking for a long time about what a healthy version of belonging at massive scale might look like.
I did not enjoy this episode. The time did not fly. I did remember why I love podcasts and how powerful they are. I learned some things about myself and how I approach both podcasting and politics. I found it to be a pretty rich text as I try to navigate this moment in American history.
[Leave a comment](https://www.pantsuitpoliticsshow.com/p/10-things-i-learned-from-elon-musk/comments)
Since the theme for this weekâs newsletter is podcasting, Sarah and Beth shared their thoughts on Gavin Newsomeâs new podcast âThis is Gavin Newsomeâ and his headturning guests on our bonus episode of Pantsuit Politics this week. It was spicy, as advertised.
[Share](https://www.pantsuitpoliticsshow.com/p/10-things-i-learned-from-elon-musk?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email&utm_content=share&action=share)
[](https://instagram.com/p/DGQsFT4xtTm)
- **Sarah:** *[Careless People: A Cautionary Tale of Power, Greed, and Lost Idealism](https://a.co/d/eJvq4if)* [by Sarah Wynn-Williams](https://a.co/d/eJvq4if)
- **Beth:** [DOGE Makes Its Latest Errors Harder to Find](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/13/us/politics/doge-errors-funding-grants-claims.html) (The New York Times)
- **Alise:** [Severance](https://tv.apple.com/us/show/severance/umc.cmc.1srk2goyh2q2zdxcx605w8vtx) (Apple TV). Please join her in the chat for all the Severance talk.
- **Maggie:** [âYouâve Blown a Hole in the Familyâ: Inside the Murdochsâ Succession Drama](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/13/magazine/rupert-murdoch-succession-family-trust-fight.html) (The New York Times Magazine) *Note: I did not watch Succession, but if the writers had come up with this, they would have been like âwe have to tone it down, no one will ever believe thatâ*
Thanks for reading Pantsuit Politics! This post is public, so feel free to share it.
[Share](https://www.pantsuitpoliticsshow.com/p/10-things-i-learned-from-elon-musk?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email&utm_content=share&action=share)
*Copyright (C) 2024 Pantsuit Politics. All rights reserved.* |
| Shard | 87 (laksa) |
| Root Hash | 17039359203870284687 |
| Unparsed URL | com,pantsuitpoliticsshow!www,/p/10-things-i-learned-from-elon-musk s443 |