âčïž Skipped - page is already crawled
| Filter | Status | Condition | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| HTTP status | PASS | download_http_code = 200 | HTTP 200 |
| Age cutoff | PASS | download_stamp > now() - 6 MONTH | 2.2 months ago |
| History drop | PASS | isNull(history_drop_reason) | No drop reason |
| Spam/ban | PASS | fh_dont_index != 1 AND ml_spam_score = 0 | ml_spam_score=0 |
| Canonical | PASS | meta_canonical IS NULL OR = '' OR = src_unparsed | Not set |
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| URL | https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/04/world/asia/philippines-divorce-illegal-legislation.html |
| Last Crawled | 2026-02-15 00:54:42 (2 months ago) |
| First Indexed | 2023-11-04 06:11:56 (2 years ago) |
| HTTP Status Code | 200 |
| Meta Title | How Long Will Divorce Remain Illegal in the Philippines? - The New York Times |
| Meta Description | A campaign in the Philippines that frames divorce as a basic human right is gaining momentum, despite systemic and religious barriers. |
| Meta Canonical | null |
| Boilerpipe Text | Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT
A campaign in the Philippines that frames divorce as a basic human right is gaining momentum, despite systemic and religious barriers.
Janet Kristine Guevarra had to save more than a yearâs wages to pay for an annulment.
Credit...
Ezra Acayan for The New York Times
Nov. 4, 2023
Nearly 15 years ago, Mary Nepomuceno separated from her husband. She remains in limbo because divorce â and the possibility of a new marriage and a clean slate in life â is forbidden by her countryâs laws.
Thousands of people like Ms. Nepomuceno are trapped in long-dead marriages in the Philippines, the only country in the world, other than the Vatican, where divorce remains illegal. They live completely separate lives from their spouses, after splitting up for reasons like abuse and incompatibility. Steep legal fees and mounds of paperwork make annulment practically impossible for many.
Partly because of their growing numbers and plight, attitudes in the country, where nearly 80 percent of the population is Catholic, have changed. Surveys show that half of Filipinos now support divorce. Even the president has signaled openness to the idea, and the Philippines is the closest it has ever been to legalizing divorce.
But the issue is far from settled. The powerful Catholic Church has deemed pro-divorce activism to be âirrational advocacy.â Conservative lawmakers remain steadfast in their opposition.
This has prompted some in the legalization camp to frame divorce as a basic human right, like access to health care or education.
âWeâre saying that this is just like medicine,â said Ms. Nepomuceno, 54. âYou only take this if youâre sick, but you donât deprive those sick people of the medicine.â
Image
The pro-divorce activist Mary Nepomuceno last month in her village, Paranaque, in Metro Manila.
The approach is a departure from the previous strategy of sharing personal stories in the hope of winning lawmakersâ sympathy. Now, activists are using science and statistics to present the long-term effects that keeping divorce illegal has on millions of abused women.
âWe used to cry, we would get angry,â said A.J. Alfafara, a founder of Divorce Pilipinas Coalition, which has more than a half-million members. âIt used to be a fight, like how do we get people to listen?â
In recent months, a Senate committee approved a bill on divorce for the first time in more than 30 years. The bill is now awaiting a second reading in the Senate, which lawmakers say could happen next year.
âWe are feeling some kind of shifts, even in the Senate, and I hope that they will gather momentum and be strong enough to carry this bill to the finish line,â Senator Risa Hontiveros, the billâs sponsor, said in an interview.
She added that she had been moved by her meetings with activists.
âFor me, one of the most compelling themes that came from them is that this is a second chance â a second chance at life, a second chance at love, a second chance at happiness â and why should we deny people that right?â she said.
Image
Senator Risa Hontiveros says she feels âshiftsâ in how divorce is perceived in the Philippines.
Divorce has a complicated history in the Philippines. During the Spanish colonial era, divorce was banned, but legal separation was allowed under narrow conditions. Under American occupation, it was made legal, but only on the grounds of adultery and concubinage. The Japanese, who occupied the Philippines during World War II, expanded the divorce law, allowing more grounds for people to seek divorce.
That changed after the enactment of the countryâs Civil Code in 1950. But Muslim citizens, who make up 5 percent of the population, are allowed to divorce, because in 1977, Ferdinand E. Marcos, the president at the time, signed legislation allowing it.
Ms. Alfafara, a Protestant, separated from her husband in 2012. She said she had not seen her son in more than a decade, since he chose at the age of 9 to live with his father. When Ms. Alfafara, 46, who works as a virtual office assistant, wanted to buy a house, she was told she had to get her husbandâs signature.
Keeping divorce illegal means that abusive husbands can retain joint custody of their children and are entitled to share in their wivesâ assets. Another concern is the mental trauma suffered by millions of women trapped in abusive marriages.
Image
A.J. Alfafara, who separated from her husband in 2012, co-founded Divorce Pilipinas Coalition, which has more than a half-million members.
Janet Guevarra, 36, spent $5,200 for her annulment â 15 times what she was making monthly in the Philippines. To save the money, she quit her job in I.T. administration and moved to Singapore to work as an aide in a nursing home. In 2022, a court rejected her petition, which she had filed three years earlier.
The judge ruled that Ms. Guevarraâs testimony that her husband âgrabbed her collar, pushed and attempted to punch her during heated arguments is not enough basis to prove her claim of physical or verbal abuse.â The judge added, âMarriage, as an inviolable social institution protected by the state, cannot be dissolved at the whim of the parties.â
Haidee Sanchez, 39, said it pained her each time she had to write her husbandâs last name on all official documents. She said her husband, who never provided for her family and was repeatedly unfaithful, tried to choke her when she confronted him over an affair. In 2019, she filed for an annulment, but her motion was denied in March.
The judge ruled that Ms. Sanchez had failed to prove her case âwith clear and convincing proof.â
Some supporters of the legislation have advised against using the word âdivorceâ to describe it, saying the term has become politicized. Alternative language like âlegal separationâ and âannulment expansionâ has been floated.
Ms. Hontiveros recalled that one of her colleagues advised her, âDonât call it a divorce bill, call it the dissolution of marriage bill.â She followed that suggestion.
Image
Ms. Guevarra with documents she used in her annulment application.
âMaybe it just gives those who are ambivalent about it or opposed to it another way to talk about it a little less uncomfortably,â she said.
Senator Pia Cayetano, a veteran lawmaker and an outspoken supporter of divorce, said her colleagues in the Senate âreally recognize that there are instances where itâs practically inhumane to make a couple live together.â
âI have heard them say things to that effect, that thereâs got to be a solution, and theyâre happy to support something,â Senator Cayetano said.
Any bill that is passed by the Senate would also have to be cleared by the House of Representatives before going to the president, who would sign it into law. Unlike his predecessors, President Ferdinand E. Marcos Jr. has signaled that he is open to legalizing divorce, though he cautioned that it âshould not be easy.â
Father Jerome Secillano, the executive secretary of the Catholic Bishopsâ Conference of the Philippines, told a local radio station last year, âIt is sad to know that we have legislators who rather focus on breaking marriages and the family rather than fixing them or strengthening the marital bond.â
A decade ago, when the Philippine Congress passed legislation that gave people access to contraception, the clergy held protests and threatened to excommunicate lawmakers for supporting the bill. This time, said Edcel Lagman, a congressman who has pushed for both issues, church officials have been less vocal in its opposition.
âWeâve shown that we can beat the church, and we can do it again,â he said, flashing a smile.
Sui-Lee Wee
is the Southeast Asia bureau chief for The Times, overseeing coverage of 11 countries in the region.
A version of this article appears in print on
Nov. 5, 2023
, Section A, Page 4 of the New York edition with the headline: âSecond Chance at Lifeâ: Filipinos Push to Legalize Divorce
.
Order Reprints
|
Todayâs Paper
|
Subscribe
Related Content
More in Asia Pacific
Lauren DeCicca for The New York Times
Kim Hong-Ji/Reuters
Qilai Shen for The New York Times
Doug Mills/The New York Times
Editorsâ Picks
Brian Rea
Antonio de Luca/The New York Times
Trending in The Times
Cassidy Araiza for The New York Times
James Hill for The New York Times
Columbia Pictures/Sony Pictures Animation
Nicolas Ortega
Mark Abramson for The New York Times
Cristina Matuozzi for The New York Times
Ariana Drehsler for The New York Times
Michael Buholzer/EPA, via Shutterstock
John Atashian/Getty Images
Dragan Arsovski
Advertisement
SKIP ADVERTISEMENT |
| Markdown | [Skip to content](https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/04/world/asia/philippines-divorce-illegal-legislation.html#site-content)[Skip to site index](https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/04/world/asia/philippines-divorce-illegal-legislation.html#site-index)
Search & Section Navigation
Section Navigation
Search
[Asia Pacific](https://www.nytimes.com/section/world/asia)
[Log in](https://myaccount.nytimes.com/auth/login?response_type=cookie&client_id=vi&redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2Fsubscription%2Fonboarding-offer%3FcampaignId%3D7JFJX%26EXIT_URI%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.nytimes.com%252F2023%252F11%252F04%252Fworld%252Fasia%252Fphilippines-divorce-illegal-legislation.html&asset=masthead)
Saturday, February 14, 2026
[Todayâs Paper](https://www.nytimes.com/section/todayspaper)
[Asia Pacific](https://www.nytimes.com/section/world/asia)\|âJust Like Medicineâ: A New Push for Divorce in a Nation Where Itâs Illegal
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/04/world/asia/philippines-divorce-illegal-legislation.html
- Share full article
Advertisement
[SKIP ADVERTISEMENT](https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/04/world/asia/philippines-divorce-illegal-legislation.html#after-top)
Supported by
[SKIP ADVERTISEMENT](https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/04/world/asia/philippines-divorce-illegal-legislation.html#after-sponsor)
# âJust Like Medicineâ: A New Push for Divorce in a Nation Where Itâs Illegal
A campaign in the Philippines that frames divorce as a basic human right is gaining momentum, despite systemic and religious barriers.
- Share full article

Janet Kristine Guevarra had to save more than a yearâs wages to pay for an annulment.Credit...Ezra Acayan for The New York Times
By [Sui-Lee Wee](https://www.nytimes.com/by/sui-lee-wee)
Photographs by Ezra Acayan
Reporting from Manila
Nov. 4, 2023
[Leer en español](https://www.nytimes.com/es/2023/11/08/espanol/divorcio-prohibido-filipinas.html "Read in Spanish")
Nearly 15 years ago, Mary Nepomuceno separated from her husband. She remains in limbo because divorce â and the possibility of a new marriage and a clean slate in life â is forbidden by her countryâs laws.
Thousands of people like Ms. Nepomuceno are trapped in long-dead marriages in the Philippines, the only country in the world, other than the Vatican, where divorce remains illegal. They live completely separate lives from their spouses, after splitting up for reasons like abuse and incompatibility. Steep legal fees and mounds of paperwork make annulment practically impossible for many.
Partly because of their growing numbers and plight, attitudes in the country, where nearly 80 percent of the population is Catholic, have changed. Surveys show that half of Filipinos now support divorce. Even the president has signaled openness to the idea, and the Philippines is the closest it has ever been to legalizing divorce.
But the issue is far from settled. The powerful Catholic Church has deemed pro-divorce activism to be âirrational advocacy.â Conservative lawmakers remain steadfast in their opposition.
This has prompted some in the legalization camp to frame divorce as a basic human right, like access to health care or education.
âWeâre saying that this is just like medicine,â said Ms. Nepomuceno, 54. âYou only take this if youâre sick, but you donât deprive those sick people of the medicine.â
Image

The pro-divorce activist Mary Nepomuceno last month in her village, Paranaque, in Metro Manila.
The approach is a departure from the previous strategy of sharing personal stories in the hope of winning lawmakersâ sympathy. Now, activists are using science and statistics to present the long-term effects that keeping divorce illegal has on millions of abused women.
âWe used to cry, we would get angry,â said A.J. Alfafara, a founder of Divorce Pilipinas Coalition, which has more than a half-million members. âIt used to be a fight, like how do we get people to listen?â
In recent months, a Senate committee approved a bill on divorce for the first time in more than 30 years. The bill is now awaiting a second reading in the Senate, which lawmakers say could happen next year.
âWe are feeling some kind of shifts, even in the Senate, and I hope that they will gather momentum and be strong enough to carry this bill to the finish line,â Senator Risa Hontiveros, the billâs sponsor, said in an interview.
She added that she had been moved by her meetings with activists.
âFor me, one of the most compelling themes that came from them is that this is a second chance â a second chance at life, a second chance at love, a second chance at happiness â and why should we deny people that right?â she said.
Image

Senator Risa Hontiveros says she feels âshiftsâ in how divorce is perceived in the Philippines.
Divorce has a complicated history in the Philippines. During the Spanish colonial era, divorce was banned, but legal separation was allowed under narrow conditions. Under American occupation, it was made legal, but only on the grounds of adultery and concubinage. The Japanese, who occupied the Philippines during World War II, expanded the divorce law, allowing more grounds for people to seek divorce.
That changed after the enactment of the countryâs Civil Code in 1950. But Muslim citizens, who make up 5 percent of the population, are allowed to divorce, because in 1977, Ferdinand E. Marcos, the president at the time, signed legislation allowing it.
Ms. Alfafara, a Protestant, separated from her husband in 2012. She said she had not seen her son in more than a decade, since he chose at the age of 9 to live with his father. When Ms. Alfafara, 46, who works as a virtual office assistant, wanted to buy a house, she was told she had to get her husbandâs signature.
Keeping divorce illegal means that abusive husbands can retain joint custody of their children and are entitled to share in their wivesâ assets. Another concern is the mental trauma suffered by millions of women trapped in abusive marriages.
Image

A.J. Alfafara, who separated from her husband in 2012, co-founded Divorce Pilipinas Coalition, which has more than a half-million members.
Janet Guevarra, 36, spent \$5,200 for her annulment â 15 times what she was making monthly in the Philippines. To save the money, she quit her job in I.T. administration and moved to Singapore to work as an aide in a nursing home. In 2022, a court rejected her petition, which she had filed three years earlier.
The judge ruled that Ms. Guevarraâs testimony that her husband âgrabbed her collar, pushed and attempted to punch her during heated arguments is not enough basis to prove her claim of physical or verbal abuse.â The judge added, âMarriage, as an inviolable social institution protected by the state, cannot be dissolved at the whim of the parties.â
Haidee Sanchez, 39, said it pained her each time she had to write her husbandâs last name on all official documents. She said her husband, who never provided for her family and was repeatedly unfaithful, tried to choke her when she confronted him over an affair. In 2019, she filed for an annulment, but her motion was denied in March.
The judge ruled that Ms. Sanchez had failed to prove her case âwith clear and convincing proof.â
Some supporters of the legislation have advised against using the word âdivorceâ to describe it, saying the term has become politicized. Alternative language like âlegal separationâ and âannulment expansionâ has been floated.
Ms. Hontiveros recalled that one of her colleagues advised her, âDonât call it a divorce bill, call it the dissolution of marriage bill.â She followed that suggestion.
## Editorsâ Picks
[What Olympians Can Teach Us About Disappointment](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/11/well/move/winter-olympics-athletes-disappointment.html)
[Vibrant Curls and Clothes With Volume](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/10/style/street-style-look-voluminous-curly-hair-baggy-clothes.html)
[Gen Zâs Favorite Party Platform Wants to Set You Up](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/14/style/partiful-crush-feature.html)
Advertisement
[SKIP ADVERTISEMENT](https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/04/world/asia/philippines-divorce-illegal-legislation.html#after-pp_edpick)
Image

Ms. Guevarra with documents she used in her annulment application.
âMaybe it just gives those who are ambivalent about it or opposed to it another way to talk about it a little less uncomfortably,â she said.
Senator Pia Cayetano, a veteran lawmaker and an outspoken supporter of divorce, said her colleagues in the Senate âreally recognize that there are instances where itâs practically inhumane to make a couple live together.â
âI have heard them say things to that effect, that thereâs got to be a solution, and theyâre happy to support something,â Senator Cayetano said.
Any bill that is passed by the Senate would also have to be cleared by the House of Representatives before going to the president, who would sign it into law. Unlike his predecessors, President Ferdinand E. Marcos Jr. has signaled that he is open to legalizing divorce, though he cautioned that it âshould not be easy.â
Father Jerome Secillano, the executive secretary of the Catholic Bishopsâ Conference of the Philippines, told a local radio station last year, âIt is sad to know that we have legislators who rather focus on breaking marriages and the family rather than fixing them or strengthening the marital bond.â
A decade ago, when the Philippine Congress passed legislation that gave people access to contraception, the clergy held protests and threatened to excommunicate lawmakers for supporting the bill. This time, said Edcel Lagman, a congressman who has pushed for both issues, church officials have been less vocal in its opposition.
âWeâve shown that we can beat the church, and we can do it again,â he said, flashing a smile.
[Sui-Lee Wee](https://www.nytimes.com/by/sui-lee-wee) is the Southeast Asia bureau chief for The Times, overseeing coverage of 11 countries in the region.
A version of this article appears in print on Nov. 5, 2023, Section A, Page 4 of the New York edition with the headline: âSecond Chance at Lifeâ: Filipinos Push to Legalize Divorce. [Order Reprints](https://nytimes.wrightsmedia.com/) \| [Todayâs Paper](https://www.nytimes.com/section/todayspaper) \| [Subscribe](https://www.nytimes.com/subscriptions/Multiproduct/lp8HYKU.html?campaignId=48JQY)
See more on: [Roman Catholic Church](https://www.nytimes.com/topic/organization/roman-catholic-church)
- Share full article
***
## Around the World With The Times
### Our reporters across the globe take you into the field.
***
- **Polyamory in Brazil:** More people in a still largely conservative and religious nation [are rejecting monogamy as they seek new definitions of romance, and of family](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/14/world/americas/brazil-polyamory-non-monogamy-catholic.html).
- **Beirut Beneath Drones:** More than a year into a cease-fire, [the mechanical whir of Israeli drones above the Lebanese capital](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/14/world/middleeast/beirut-drones-sound-israel-airstrikes.html) is a reminder that, in many ways, the war never really ended.
- **Kenya Bans Cash Bouquets:** Floral arrangements crafted from carefully-folded, colorful bank notes [had become a popular symbol of love in Nairobi](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/13/world/africa/kenya-money-bouquets-valentines-day.html).
- **A Shift in Chinese Taste:** Malaysian durian farmers [saw immense profits over the last decade as China](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/10/world/asia/durian-malaysia-china-demand.html) snapped up the fruit. But things have changed.
## Related Content
### [More in Asia Pacific](https://www.nytimes.com/section/world/asia)
- [Farmers Made a Fortune on This Fruit. Now It Is Piling Up.](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/10/world/asia/durian-malaysia-china-demand.html)

Lauren DeCicca for The New York Times
- [Would You Leave Your Bag Unattended at a Starbucks? They Did. For Hours.](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/12/world/asia/south-korea-cafe-culture.html)

Kim Hong-Ji/Reuters
- [New Research Absolves the Woman Blamed for a Dynastyâs Ruin](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/14/world/asia/china-zhou-dynasty-king-climate-change.html)

Qilai Shen for The New York Times
- [An Olympics of Firsts: Brazil and Kazakhstan Claim Surprise Golds](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/14/world/olympics/brazil-kazakhstan-gold-medals-winter-olympics.html)

Doug Mills/The New York Times
### Editorsâ Picks
- [I Had Buyerâs Remorse. It Almost Ended My Marriage.](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/13/style/modern-love-i-had-buyers-remorse-it-almost-ended-my-marriage.html)

Brian Rea
- [Your 35 (New! Crowdsourced!) Dating Rules](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/12/style/modern-dating-rules.html)

Antonio de Luca/The New York Times
### Trending in The Times
- [Handsome at Any Cost](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/13/style/clavicular-looksmaxxing-braden-peters.html)

Cassidy Araiza for The New York Times
- [Navalny Killed By Frog Toxin, European Governments Say](https://www.nytimes.com/video/world/europe/100000010713683/russia-navalny-poison.html)

James Hill for The New York Times
- [âGoatâ Review: Big League Dreams](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/12/movies/goat-review.html)

Columbia Pictures/Sony Pictures Animation
- [How to Sleep With Other People](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/11/realestate/how-to-sleep-with-other-people.html)

Nicolas Ortega
- [Americans Are Paying the Bill for Tariffs, Despite Trumpâs Claims](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/12/business/economy/americans-pay-tariffs-trump-fed.html)

Mark Abramson for The New York Times
- [Pride Flag Returns to Stonewall, Defying Federal Order](https://www.nytimes.com/video/us/100000010709797/stonewall-flag-protest-nyc.html)

Cristina Matuozzi for The New York Times
- [Bondi Suggests Culver City Has a Crime Problem. Culver City Has a Problem With That.](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/13/us/bondi-culver-city-crime.html)

Ariana Drehsler for The New York Times
- [Switzerland to Vote on Capping Population at 10 Million](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/11/world/europe/switzerland-to-vote-on-capping-population-at-10-million.html)

Michael Buholzer/EPA, via Shutterstock
- [Greg Brown, Guitarist Who Wrote Cakeâs Biggest Hit, Dies at 56](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/12/arts/music/greg-brown-dead.html)

John Atashian/Getty Images
- [Constant Sexual Aggression Drives Female Tortoises to Walk Off Cliffs](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/14/science/tortoises-island-sex-cliff.html)

Dragan Arsovski
Advertisement
[SKIP ADVERTISEMENT](https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/04/world/asia/philippines-divorce-illegal-legislation.html#after-bottom)
## Site Index
[Go to Home Page »](https://www.nytimes.com/)
News
- [Home Page](https://www.nytimes.com/)
- [U.S.](https://www.nytimes.com/section/us)
- [World](https://www.nytimes.com/section/world)
- [Politics](https://www.nytimes.com/section/politics)
- [New York](https://www.nytimes.com/section/nyregion)
- [Education](https://www.nytimes.com/section/education)
- [Sports](https://www.nytimes.com/section/sports)
- [Business](https://www.nytimes.com/section/business)
- [Tech](https://www.nytimes.com/section/technology)
- [Science](https://www.nytimes.com/section/science)
- [Weather](https://www.nytimes.com/section/weather)
- [The Great Read](https://www.nytimes.com/spotlight/the-great-read)
- [Obituaries](https://www.nytimes.com/section/obituaries)
- [Headway](https://www.nytimes.com/section/headway)
- [Visual Investigations](https://www.nytimes.com/spotlight/visual-investigations)
- [The Magazine](https://www.nytimes.com/section/magazine)
Arts
- [Book Review](https://www.nytimes.com/section/books/review)
- [Best Sellers Book List](https://www.nytimes.com/books/best-sellers/)
- [Dance](https://www.nytimes.com/section/arts/dance)
- [Movies](https://www.nytimes.com/section/movies)
- [Music](https://www.nytimes.com/section/arts/music)
- [Pop Culture](https://www.nytimes.com/spotlight/pop-culture)
- [Television](https://www.nytimes.com/section/arts/television)
- [Theater](https://www.nytimes.com/section/theater)
- [Visual Arts](https://www.nytimes.com/section/arts/design)
Lifestyle
- [Health](https://www.nytimes.com/section/health)
- [Well](https://www.nytimes.com/section/well)
- [Food](https://www.nytimes.com/section/food)
- [Restaurant Reviews](https://www.nytimes.com/reviews/dining)
- [Love](https://www.nytimes.com/section/fashion/weddings)
- [Travel](https://www.nytimes.com/section/travel)
- [Style](https://www.nytimes.com/section/style)
- [Fashion](https://www.nytimes.com/section/fashion)
- [Real Estate](https://www.nytimes.com/section/realestate)
- [T Magazine](https://www.nytimes.com/section/t-magazine)
Opinion
- [Today's Opinion](https://www.nytimes.com/section/opinion)
- [Columnists](https://www.nytimes.com/section/opinion/columnists)
- [Editorials](https://www.nytimes.com/section/opinion/editorials)
- [Guest Essays](https://www.nytimes.com/section/opinion/contributors)
- [Op-Docs](https://www.nytimes.com/column/op-docs)
- [Letters](https://www.nytimes.com/section/opinion/letters)
- [Sunday Opinion](https://www.nytimes.com/section/opinion/sunday)
- [Opinion Video](https://www.nytimes.com/spotlight/opinion-video)
- [Opinion Audio](https://www.nytimes.com/series/opinion-audio)
More
- [Audio](https://www.nytimes.com/spotlight/podcasts)
- [Games](https://www.nytimes.com/crosswords)
- [Cooking](https://cooking.nytimes.com/)
- [Wirecutter](https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/)
- [The Athletic](https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/)
- [Jobs](https://www.nytimes.com/section/jobs)
- [Video](https://www.nytimes.com/video)
- [Graphics](https://www.nytimes.com/spotlight/graphics)
- [Trending](https://www.nytimes.com/trending/)
- [Live Events](https://www.nytimes.com/spotlight/nyt-events)
- [Corrections](https://www.nytimes.com/section/corrections)
- [Reader Center](https://www.nytimes.com/section/reader-center)
- [TimesMachine](https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/browser)
- [The Learning Network](https://www.nytimes.com/section/learning)
- [School of The NYT](https://nytedu.com/)
- [inEducation](https://www.nytimes.com/spotlight/nytimesineducation)
### News
- [Home Page](https://www.nytimes.com/)
- [U.S.](https://www.nytimes.com/section/us)
- [World](https://www.nytimes.com/section/world)
- [Politics](https://www.nytimes.com/section/politics)
- [New York](https://www.nytimes.com/section/nyregion)
- [Education](https://www.nytimes.com/section/education)
- [Sports](https://www.nytimes.com/section/sports)
- [Business](https://www.nytimes.com/section/business)
- [Tech](https://www.nytimes.com/section/technology)
- [Science](https://www.nytimes.com/section/science)
- [Weather](https://www.nytimes.com/section/weather)
- [The Great Read](https://www.nytimes.com/spotlight/the-great-read)
- [Obituaries](https://www.nytimes.com/section/obituaries)
- [Headway](https://www.nytimes.com/section/headway)
- [Visual Investigations](https://www.nytimes.com/spotlight/visual-investigations)
- [The Magazine](https://www.nytimes.com/section/magazine)
### Arts
- [Book Review](https://www.nytimes.com/section/books/review)
- [Best Sellers Book List](https://www.nytimes.com/books/best-sellers/)
- [Dance](https://www.nytimes.com/section/arts/dance)
- [Movies](https://www.nytimes.com/section/movies)
- [Music](https://www.nytimes.com/section/arts/music)
- [Pop Culture](https://www.nytimes.com/spotlight/pop-culture)
- [Television](https://www.nytimes.com/section/arts/television)
- [Theater](https://www.nytimes.com/section/theater)
- [Visual Arts](https://www.nytimes.com/section/arts/design)
### Lifestyle
- [Health](https://www.nytimes.com/section/health)
- [Well](https://www.nytimes.com/section/well)
- [Food](https://www.nytimes.com/section/food)
- [Restaurant Reviews](https://www.nytimes.com/reviews/dining)
- [Love](https://www.nytimes.com/section/fashion/weddings)
- [Travel](https://www.nytimes.com/section/travel)
- [Style](https://www.nytimes.com/section/style)
- [Fashion](https://www.nytimes.com/section/fashion)
- [Real Estate](https://www.nytimes.com/section/realestate)
- [T Magazine](https://www.nytimes.com/section/t-magazine)
### Opinion
- [Today's Opinion](https://www.nytimes.com/section/opinion)
- [Columnists](https://www.nytimes.com/section/opinion/columnists)
- [Editorials](https://www.nytimes.com/section/opinion/editorials)
- [Guest Essays](https://www.nytimes.com/section/opinion/contributors)
- [Op-Docs](https://www.nytimes.com/column/op-docs)
- [Letters](https://www.nytimes.com/section/opinion/letters)
- [Sunday Opinion](https://www.nytimes.com/section/opinion/sunday)
- [Opinion Video](https://www.nytimes.com/spotlight/opinion-video)
- [Opinion Audio](https://www.nytimes.com/series/opinion-audio)
### More
- [Audio](https://www.nytimes.com/spotlight/podcasts)
- [Games](https://www.nytimes.com/crosswords)
- [Cooking](https://cooking.nytimes.com/)
- [Wirecutter](https://www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/)
- [The Athletic](https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/)
- [Jobs](https://www.nytimes.com/section/jobs)
- [Video](https://www.nytimes.com/video)
- [Graphics](https://www.nytimes.com/spotlight/graphics)
- [Trending](https://www.nytimes.com/trending/)
- [Live Events](https://www.nytimes.com/spotlight/nyt-events)
- [Corrections](https://www.nytimes.com/section/corrections)
- [Reader Center](https://www.nytimes.com/section/reader-center)
- [TimesMachine](https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/browser)
- [The Learning Network](https://www.nytimes.com/section/learning)
- [School of The NYT](https://nytedu.com/)
- [inEducation](https://www.nytimes.com/spotlight/nytimesineducation)
### Account
- [Subscribe](https://www.nytimes.com/subscription)
- [Manage My Account](https://www.nytimes.com/account)
- [Home Delivery](https://www.nytimes.com/subscription/home-delivery)
- [Gift Subscriptions](https://www.nytimes.com/gift)
- [Group Subscriptions](https://www.nytimes.com/subscription/groups?Pardot_Campaign_Code_Form_Input=89FQX)
- [Gift Articles](https://www.nytimes.com/gift-articles)
- [Email Newsletters](https://www.nytimes.com/newsletters)
- [NYT Licensing](https://nytlicensing.com/)
- [Replica Edition](https://nytimes.pressreader.com/)
- [Times Store](https://store.nytimes.com/)
## Site Information Navigation
- [© 2026 The New York Times Company](https://help.nytimes.com/hc/en-us/articles/115014792127-Copyright-Notice)
- [NYTCo](https://www.nytco.com/)
- [Contact Us](https://help.nytimes.com/hc/en-us/articles/115015385887-Contact-The-New-York-Times)
- [Accessibility](https://help.nytimes.com/hc/en-us/articles/115015727108-Accessibility)
- [Work with us](https://www.nytco.com/careers/)
- [Advertise](https://advertising.nytimes.com/)
- [T Brand Studio](https://advertising.nytimes.com/custom-content/)
- [Privacy Policy](https://help.nytimes.com/hc/en-us/articles/10940941449492-The-New-York-Times-Company-Privacy-Policy)
- [Cookie Policy](https://www.nytimes.com/privacy/cookie-policy)
- [Terms of Service](https://help.nytimes.com/hc/en-us/articles/115014893428-Terms-of-Service)
- [Terms of Sale](https://help.nytimes.com/hc/en-us/articles/115014893968-Terms-of-Sale)
- [Site Map](https://www.nytimes.com/sitemap/)
- [Canada](https://www.nytimes.com/ca/)
- [International](https://www.nytimes.com/international/)
- [Help](https://help.nytimes.com/hc/en-us)
- [Subscriptions](https://www.nytimes.com/subscription?campaignId=37WXW) |
| Readable Markdown | Advertisement
[SKIP ADVERTISEMENT](https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/04/world/asia/philippines-divorce-illegal-legislation.html#after-top)
A campaign in the Philippines that frames divorce as a basic human right is gaining momentum, despite systemic and religious barriers.

Janet Kristine Guevarra had to save more than a yearâs wages to pay for an annulment.Credit...Ezra Acayan for The New York Times
Nov. 4, 2023
Nearly 15 years ago, Mary Nepomuceno separated from her husband. She remains in limbo because divorce â and the possibility of a new marriage and a clean slate in life â is forbidden by her countryâs laws.
Thousands of people like Ms. Nepomuceno are trapped in long-dead marriages in the Philippines, the only country in the world, other than the Vatican, where divorce remains illegal. They live completely separate lives from their spouses, after splitting up for reasons like abuse and incompatibility. Steep legal fees and mounds of paperwork make annulment practically impossible for many.
Partly because of their growing numbers and plight, attitudes in the country, where nearly 80 percent of the population is Catholic, have changed. Surveys show that half of Filipinos now support divorce. Even the president has signaled openness to the idea, and the Philippines is the closest it has ever been to legalizing divorce.
But the issue is far from settled. The powerful Catholic Church has deemed pro-divorce activism to be âirrational advocacy.â Conservative lawmakers remain steadfast in their opposition.
This has prompted some in the legalization camp to frame divorce as a basic human right, like access to health care or education.
âWeâre saying that this is just like medicine,â said Ms. Nepomuceno, 54. âYou only take this if youâre sick, but you donât deprive those sick people of the medicine.â
Image

The pro-divorce activist Mary Nepomuceno last month in her village, Paranaque, in Metro Manila.
The approach is a departure from the previous strategy of sharing personal stories in the hope of winning lawmakersâ sympathy. Now, activists are using science and statistics to present the long-term effects that keeping divorce illegal has on millions of abused women.
âWe used to cry, we would get angry,â said A.J. Alfafara, a founder of Divorce Pilipinas Coalition, which has more than a half-million members. âIt used to be a fight, like how do we get people to listen?â
In recent months, a Senate committee approved a bill on divorce for the first time in more than 30 years. The bill is now awaiting a second reading in the Senate, which lawmakers say could happen next year.
âWe are feeling some kind of shifts, even in the Senate, and I hope that they will gather momentum and be strong enough to carry this bill to the finish line,â Senator Risa Hontiveros, the billâs sponsor, said in an interview.
She added that she had been moved by her meetings with activists.
âFor me, one of the most compelling themes that came from them is that this is a second chance â a second chance at life, a second chance at love, a second chance at happiness â and why should we deny people that right?â she said.
Image

Senator Risa Hontiveros says she feels âshiftsâ in how divorce is perceived in the Philippines.
Divorce has a complicated history in the Philippines. During the Spanish colonial era, divorce was banned, but legal separation was allowed under narrow conditions. Under American occupation, it was made legal, but only on the grounds of adultery and concubinage. The Japanese, who occupied the Philippines during World War II, expanded the divorce law, allowing more grounds for people to seek divorce.
That changed after the enactment of the countryâs Civil Code in 1950. But Muslim citizens, who make up 5 percent of the population, are allowed to divorce, because in 1977, Ferdinand E. Marcos, the president at the time, signed legislation allowing it.
Ms. Alfafara, a Protestant, separated from her husband in 2012. She said she had not seen her son in more than a decade, since he chose at the age of 9 to live with his father. When Ms. Alfafara, 46, who works as a virtual office assistant, wanted to buy a house, she was told she had to get her husbandâs signature.
Keeping divorce illegal means that abusive husbands can retain joint custody of their children and are entitled to share in their wivesâ assets. Another concern is the mental trauma suffered by millions of women trapped in abusive marriages.
Image

A.J. Alfafara, who separated from her husband in 2012, co-founded Divorce Pilipinas Coalition, which has more than a half-million members.
Janet Guevarra, 36, spent \$5,200 for her annulment â 15 times what she was making monthly in the Philippines. To save the money, she quit her job in I.T. administration and moved to Singapore to work as an aide in a nursing home. In 2022, a court rejected her petition, which she had filed three years earlier.
The judge ruled that Ms. Guevarraâs testimony that her husband âgrabbed her collar, pushed and attempted to punch her during heated arguments is not enough basis to prove her claim of physical or verbal abuse.â The judge added, âMarriage, as an inviolable social institution protected by the state, cannot be dissolved at the whim of the parties.â
Haidee Sanchez, 39, said it pained her each time she had to write her husbandâs last name on all official documents. She said her husband, who never provided for her family and was repeatedly unfaithful, tried to choke her when she confronted him over an affair. In 2019, she filed for an annulment, but her motion was denied in March.
The judge ruled that Ms. Sanchez had failed to prove her case âwith clear and convincing proof.â
Some supporters of the legislation have advised against using the word âdivorceâ to describe it, saying the term has become politicized. Alternative language like âlegal separationâ and âannulment expansionâ has been floated.
Ms. Hontiveros recalled that one of her colleagues advised her, âDonât call it a divorce bill, call it the dissolution of marriage bill.â She followed that suggestion.
Image

Ms. Guevarra with documents she used in her annulment application.
âMaybe it just gives those who are ambivalent about it or opposed to it another way to talk about it a little less uncomfortably,â she said.
Senator Pia Cayetano, a veteran lawmaker and an outspoken supporter of divorce, said her colleagues in the Senate âreally recognize that there are instances where itâs practically inhumane to make a couple live together.â
âI have heard them say things to that effect, that thereâs got to be a solution, and theyâre happy to support something,â Senator Cayetano said.
Any bill that is passed by the Senate would also have to be cleared by the House of Representatives before going to the president, who would sign it into law. Unlike his predecessors, President Ferdinand E. Marcos Jr. has signaled that he is open to legalizing divorce, though he cautioned that it âshould not be easy.â
Father Jerome Secillano, the executive secretary of the Catholic Bishopsâ Conference of the Philippines, told a local radio station last year, âIt is sad to know that we have legislators who rather focus on breaking marriages and the family rather than fixing them or strengthening the marital bond.â
A decade ago, when the Philippine Congress passed legislation that gave people access to contraception, the clergy held protests and threatened to excommunicate lawmakers for supporting the bill. This time, said Edcel Lagman, a congressman who has pushed for both issues, church officials have been less vocal in its opposition.
âWeâve shown that we can beat the church, and we can do it again,â he said, flashing a smile.
[Sui-Lee Wee](https://www.nytimes.com/by/sui-lee-wee) is the Southeast Asia bureau chief for The Times, overseeing coverage of 11 countries in the region.
A version of this article appears in print on Nov. 5, 2023, Section A, Page 4 of the New York edition with the headline: âSecond Chance at Lifeâ: Filipinos Push to Legalize Divorce. [Order Reprints](https://nytimes.wrightsmedia.com/) \| [Todayâs Paper](https://www.nytimes.com/section/todayspaper) \| [Subscribe](https://www.nytimes.com/subscriptions/Multiproduct/lp8HYKU.html?campaignId=48JQY)
## Related Content
[More in Asia Pacific](https://www.nytimes.com/section/world/asia)
- 
Lauren DeCicca for The New York Times
- 
Kim Hong-Ji/Reuters
- 
Qilai Shen for The New York Times
- 
Doug Mills/The New York Times
Editorsâ Picks
- 
Brian Rea
- 
Antonio de Luca/The New York Times
Trending in The Times
- 
Cassidy Araiza for The New York Times
- 
James Hill for The New York Times
- 
Columbia Pictures/Sony Pictures Animation
- 
Nicolas Ortega
- 
Mark Abramson for The New York Times
- 
Cristina Matuozzi for The New York Times
- 
Ariana Drehsler for The New York Times
- 
Michael Buholzer/EPA, via Shutterstock
- 
John Atashian/Getty Images
- 
Dragan Arsovski
Advertisement
[SKIP ADVERTISEMENT](https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/04/world/asia/philippines-divorce-illegal-legislation.html#after-bottom) |
| Shard | 84 (laksa) |
| Root Hash | 4566504020376537684 |
| Unparsed URL | com,nytimes!www,/2023/11/04/world/asia/philippines-divorce-illegal-legislation.html s443 |