🕷️ Crawler Inspector

URL Lookup

Direct Parameter Lookup

Raw Queries and Responses

1. Shard Calculation

Query:
Response:
Calculated Shard: 133 (from laksa142)

2. Crawled Status Check

Query:
Response:

3. Robots.txt Check

Query:
Response:

4. Spam/Ban Check

Query:
Response:

5. Seen Status Check

ℹ️ Skipped - page is already crawled

đź“„
INDEXABLE
âś…
CRAWLED
23 hours ago
🤖
ROBOTS ALLOWED

Page Info Filters

FilterStatusConditionDetails
HTTP statusPASSdownload_http_code = 200HTTP 200
Age cutoffPASSdownload_stamp > now() - 6 MONTH0 months ago
History dropPASSisNull(history_drop_reason)No drop reason
Spam/banPASSfh_dont_index != 1 AND ml_spam_score = 0ml_spam_score=0
CanonicalPASSmeta_canonical IS NULL OR = '' OR = src_unparsedNot set

Page Details

PropertyValue
URLhttps://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/why-edward-snowden-is-a-hero
Last Crawled2026-04-24 00:08:53 (23 hours ago)
First Indexed2017-08-30 08:00:50 (8 years ago)
HTTP Status Code200
Content
Meta TitleWhy Edward Snowden Is a Hero | The New Yorker
Meta DescriptionIn revealing the colossal scale of the U.S. government’s eavesdropping, the twenty-nine-year-old N.S.A. whistle-blower has performed a great public service.
Meta Canonicalnull
Boilerpipe Text
Conceivably, the fact that Uncle Sam is watching their Facebook and Google accounts could come as news to some dimwit would-be jihadis in foreign locales, prompting them to communicate in ways that are harder for the N.S.A. to track. But it will hardly surprise the organized terrorist groups, which already go to great lengths to avoid being monitored. Not for nothing did Osama bin Laden’s compound in Abbottabad go without a phone or Internet connection. Another Snowden leak, which Greenwald and the Guardian published over the weekend , was a set of documents concerning another secret N.S.A. tracking program with an Orwellian name: “Boundless Informant.” Apparently designed to keep Snowden’s former bosses abreast of what sorts of data it was collecting around the world, the program unveiled the vast reach of the N.S.A.’s activities. In March, 2013, alone, the Guardian reported, the N.S.A. collected ninety-seven billion pieces of information from computer networks worldwide, and three billion of those pieces came from U.S.-based networks. It’s hardly surprising that the main targets for the N.S.A.’s data collection were Iran (fourteen billion pieces in that period) and Pakistan (more than thirteen billion), but countries such as Jordan, India, and Egypt, American allies all, may be a bit surprised to find themselves so high on the list. “We hack everyone everywhere,” Snowden told the Guardian . “We like to make a distinction between us and the others. But we are in almost every country in the world. We are not at war with these countries.” For most Americans, the main concern will be domestic spying, and the chronic lack of oversight that Snowden’s leaks have highlighted. In the years since 9/11, the spying agencies have been given great leeway to expand their activities, with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Court, which deals with legal requests from the agencies, and the congressional intelligence committees, which nominally oversees all of their activities, all too often acting as rubber stamps rather than proper watchdogs. Partly, that was due to lack of gumption and an eagerness to look tough on issues of counterterrorism. But it also reflected a lack of information. Just a couple of months ago, at a Senate hearing, Oregon Democrat Ron Wyden, one of the few legislators to sound any misgivings over the activities of the intelligence agencies, asked Clapper , “Does the N.S.A. collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?” To which Clapper replied: “No, sir.” (He added, “Not wittingly.”) At another hearing, General Keith Alexander, the director of the N.S.A., denied fourteen times that the agency had the technical capability to intercept e-mails and other online communications in the United States. Thanks to Snowden, and what he told the Guardian and the Washington Post , we now have cause to doubt the truth of this testimony. In Snowden’s words : “The N.S.A. has built an infrastructure that allows it to intercept almost everything. With this capability, the vast majority of human communications are automatically ingested without targeting. If I wanted to see your emails or your wife’s phone, all I have to do is use intercepts. I can get your emails, passwords, phone records, credit cards.” Were Clapper and Alexander deliberately lying? If so, perhaps Snowden should be extradited to the United States and dragged into court—but only as part of a proceeding in which the two spymasters face charges of misleading Congress. I suppose you could make the argument that he is a naïve young man who didn’t fully understand the dangerous nature of the world in which we live. You could question his motives, and call him a publicity seeker, or an idiot. (Fleeing to Hong Kong wasn’t very smart.) But he doesn’t sound like an airhead; he sounds like that most awkward and infuriating of creatures—a man of conscience. “I don’t want to live in a society that does these sort of things,” he told Greenwald. “I do not want to live in a world where everything I do and say is recorded. That is not something I am willing to support or live under.” So what is Snowden’s real crime? Like Ellsberg, Vanunu, and Bradley Manning before him, he uncovered questionable activities that those in power would rather have kept secret. That’s the valuable role that whistle-blowers play in a free society, and it’s one that, in each individual case, should be weighed against the breach of trust they commit, and the potential harm their revelations can cause. In some instances, conceivably, the interests of the state should prevail. Here, though, the scales are clearly tipped in Snowden’s favor. I’ll leave the last word to Ellsberg, who, for revealing to the world that that Pentagon knew early on that the war in Vietnam was unwinnable, was described in some quarters as a communist and a traitor: “Snowden did what he did because he recognised the NSA’s surveillance programs for what they are: dangerous, unconstitutional activity. This wholesale invasion of Americans’ and foreign citizens’ privacy does not contribute to our security; it puts in danger the very liberties we’re trying to protect.” Photograph by Philippe Lopez/AFP/Getty. [#image: /photos/59095103ebe912338a37265d] Read more of our coverage of government surveillance programs.
Markdown
[Skip to main content](https://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/why-edward-snowden-is-a-hero#main-content) [![The New Yorker](https://www.newyorker.com/verso/static/thenewyorker-us/assets/logo.svg)](https://www.newyorker.com/) - [Newsletter](https://www.newyorker.com/newsletters?sourceCode=navbar) [Sign In](https://www.newyorker.com/auth/initiate?redirectURL=%2Fnews%2Fjohn-cassidy%2Fwhy-edward-snowden-is-a-hero&source=VERSO_NAVIGATION) Search - [The Latest](https://www.newyorker.com/latest) - [News](https://www.newyorker.com/news) - [Books & Culture](https://www.newyorker.com/culture) - [Fiction & Poetry](https://www.newyorker.com/fiction-and-poetry) - [Humor & Cartoons](https://www.newyorker.com/humor) - [Magazine](https://www.newyorker.com/archive) - [Puzzles & Games](https://www.newyorker.com/crossword-puzzles-and-games) - [Video](https://www.newyorker.com/video) - [Podcasts](https://www.newyorker.com/podcasts) - [Goings On](https://www.newyorker.com/goings-on) - [Shop](https://store.newyorker.com/) Open Navigation Menu [![The New Yorker](https://www.newyorker.com/verso/static/thenewyorker-us/assets/logo-header.svg)](https://www.newyorker.com/) [John Cassidy](https://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy) # Why Edward Snowden Is a Hero ![](https://media.newyorker.com/photos/59097b6d8b51cf59fc423c4d/1:1/w_270%2Cc_limit/cassidy-john-2.png) By [John Cassidy](https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/john-cassidy) June 10, 2013 Save this story Save this story ![Why Edward Snowden Is a Hero](https://media.newyorker.com/photos/59095268ebe912338a372cba/master/w_2560%2Cc_limit/hong-kong-consulate-580.jpg) Is Edward Snowden, the twenty-nine-year-old N.S.A. whistle-blower who was last said to be [hiding in](http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/10/18877589-diplomatic-intrigue-where-will-unmasked-nsa-leaker-go) Hong Kong awaiting his fate, a hero or a traitor? He is a hero. (My colleague [Jeffrey Toobin disagrees](https://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/comment/2013/06/edward-snowden-nsa-leaker-is-no-hero.html).) In revealing the colossal scale of the U.S. government’s eavesdropping on Americans and other people around the world, he has performed a great public service that more than outweighs any breach of trust he may have committed. Like Daniel Ellsberg, the former Defense Department official who released the Pentagon Papers, and Mordechai Vanunu, the Israeli nuclear technician who revealed the existence of Israel’s weapons program, before him, Snowden has brought to light important information that deserved to be in the public domain, while doing no lasting harm to the national security of his country. Doubtless, many people inside the U.S. power structure—President Obama included—and some of its apologists in the media will see things differently. When Snowden [told the *Guardian*](http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/09/nsa-whistleblower-edward-snowden-why) that “nothing good” was going to happen to him, he was almost certainly right. In [fleeing to Hong Kong](https://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/evanosnos/2013/06/what-will-china-do-with-edward-snowden.html), he may have overlooked the existence of its extradition pact with the United States, which the U.S. authorities will most certainly seek to invoke. The National Security Agency has already referred the case to the Justice Department, and James Clapper, Obama’s director of National Intelligence, [has said](http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/08/18850035-intelligence-chief-declassifies-prism-details-slams-reckless-disclosures) that Snowden’s leaks have done “huge, grave damage” to “our intelligence capabilities.” Before accepting such claims at face value, let’s remind ourselves of what the leaks so far have not contained. They didn’t reveal anything about the algorithms that the N.S.A. uses, the groups or individuals that the agency targets, or the identities of U.S. agents. They didn’t contain the contents of any U.S. military plans, or of any conversations between U.S. or foreign officials. As Glenn Greenwald, one of the journalists who broke the story, [pointed out](http://www.nbcnews.com/id/3036789/ns/msnbc-morning_joe/vp/52154665) on “Morning Joe” today, this wasn’t a WikiLeaks-style data dump. “\[Snowden\] spent months meticulously studying every document,” Greenwald said. “He didn’t just upload them to the Internet.” So, what did the leaks tell us? First, they confirmed that the U.S. government, without obtaining any court warrants, routinely collects the phone logs of tens of millions, perhaps hundreds of millions, of Americans, who have no links to terrorism whatsoever. If the publicity prompts Congress to prevent phone companies such as Verizon and A.T. & T. from acting as information-gathering subsidiaries of the spying agencies, it won’t hamper legitimate domestic-surveillance operations—the N.S.A. can always go to court to obtain a wiretap or search warrant—and it will be a very good thing for the country. The second revelation in the leaks was that the N.S.A., in targeting foreign suspects, has the capacity to access vast amounts of user data from U.S.-based Internet companies such as Facebook, Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, and Skype. Exactly how this is done remains a bit murky. But it’s clear that, in the process of monitoring the communications of overseas militants and officials and the people who communicate with them, the N.S.A. sweeps up a great deal of online data about Americans, and keeps it locked away—seemingly forever. Conceivably, the fact that Uncle Sam is watching their Facebook and Google accounts could come as news to some dimwit would-be jihadis in foreign locales, prompting them to communicate in ways that are harder for the N.S.A. to track. But it will hardly surprise the organized terrorist groups, which already go to great lengths to avoid being monitored. Not for nothing did Osama bin Laden’s compound in Abbottabad go without a phone or Internet connection. Another Snowden leak, which Greenwald and the *Guardian* [published over the weekend](http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/08/nsa-boundless-informant-global-datamining), was a set of documents concerning another secret N.S.A. tracking program with an Orwellian name: “Boundless Informant.” Apparently designed to keep Snowden’s former bosses abreast of what sorts of data it was collecting around the world, the program unveiled the vast reach of the N.S.A.’s activities. In March, 2013, alone, the *Guardian* reported, the N.S.A. collected ninety-seven billion pieces of information from computer networks worldwide, and three billion of those pieces came from U.S.-based networks. It’s hardly surprising that the main targets for the N.S.A.’s data collection were Iran (fourteen billion pieces in that period) and Pakistan (more than thirteen billion), but countries such as Jordan, India, and Egypt, American allies all, may be a bit surprised to find themselves so high on the list. “We hack everyone everywhere,” Snowden told the *Guardian*. “We like to make a distinction between us and the others. But we are in almost every country in the world. We are not at war with these countries.” Video From The New Yorker [Swift Justice: A Taliban Courtroom in Session](https://www.newyorker.com/video/watch/the-new-yorker-documentary-swift-justice-a-taliban-courtroom-in-session) For most Americans, the main concern will be domestic spying, and the chronic lack of oversight that Snowden’s leaks have highlighted. In the years since 9/11, the spying agencies have been given great leeway to expand their activities, with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Court, which deals with legal requests from the agencies, and the congressional intelligence committees, which nominally oversees all of their activities, all too often acting as rubber stamps rather than proper watchdogs. Partly, that was due to lack of gumption and an eagerness to look tough on issues of counterterrorism. But it also reflected a lack of information. Just a couple of months ago, at a Senate hearing, Oregon Democrat Ron Wyden, one of the few legislators to sound any misgivings over the activities of the intelligence agencies, [asked Clapper](http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/video/2013/jun/07/privacy-wyden-clapper-nsa-video), “Does the N.S.A. collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?” To which Clapper replied: “No, sir.” (He added, “Not wittingly.”) At another hearing, General Keith Alexander, the director of the N.S.A., [denied fourteen times](http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2012/03/20/nsa-chief-denies-wireds-domestic-spying-story-fourteen-times-in-congressional-hearing/) that the agency had the technical capability to intercept e-mails and other online communications in the United States. Thanks to Snowden, and what he told the *Guardian* and the Washington *Post*, we now have cause to doubt the truth of this testimony. In [Snowden’s words](http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/09/nsa-whistleblower-edward-snowden-why): “The N.S.A. has built an infrastructure that allows it to intercept almost everything. With this capability, the vast majority of human communications are automatically ingested without targeting. If I wanted to see your emails or your wife’s phone, all I have to do is use intercepts. I can get your emails, passwords, phone records, credit cards.” Were Clapper and Alexander deliberately lying? If so, perhaps Snowden should be extradited to the United States and dragged into court—but only as part of a proceeding in which the two spymasters face charges of misleading Congress. I suppose you could make the argument that he is a naïve young man who didn’t fully understand the dangerous nature of the world in which we live. You could question his motives, and call him a publicity seeker, or an idiot. (Fleeing to Hong Kong wasn’t very smart.) But he doesn’t sound like an airhead; he sounds like that most awkward and infuriating of creatures—a man of conscience. “I don’t want to live in a society that does these sort of things,” he told Greenwald. “I do not want to live in a world where everything I do and say is recorded. That is not something I am willing to support or live under.” So what is Snowden’s real crime? Like Ellsberg, Vanunu, and Bradley Manning before him, he uncovered questionable activities that those in power would rather have kept secret. That’s the valuable role that whistle-blowers play in a free society, and it’s one that, in each individual case, should be weighed against the breach of trust they commit, and the potential harm their revelations can cause. In some instances, conceivably, the interests of the state should prevail. Here, though, the scales are clearly tipped in Snowden’s favor. I’ll leave [the last word](http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jun/10/edward-snowden-united-stasi-america) to Ellsberg, who, for revealing to the world that that Pentagon knew early on that the war in Vietnam was unwinnable, was described in some quarters as a communist and a traitor: “Snowden did what he did because he recognised the NSA’s surveillance programs for what they are: dangerous, unconstitutional activity. This wholesale invasion of Americans’ and foreign citizens’ privacy does not contribute to our security; it puts in danger the very liberties we’re trying to protect.” *Photograph by Philippe Lopez/AFP/Getty.* [\[\#image: /photos/59095103ebe912338a37265d\]](http://nyr.kr/12weKvf) [*Read more of our coverage of government surveillance programs.*](https://www.newyorker.com/search?qt=dismax&rows=10&sort=publishdate+desc%2C+score+desc&fixedDate=&query=%22NSA+Scandal%22&submit=Search&magOnly=on&bylquery=) [![](https://media.newyorker.com/photos/59097b6d8b51cf59fc423c4d/1:1/w_270%2Cc_limit/cassidy-john-2.png)](https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/john-cassidy) [John Cassidy](https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/john-cassidy) has been a staff writer at *The New Yorker* since 1995. He writes [The Financial Page](https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-financial-page), a column about economics and politics. More:[Edward Snowden](https://www.newyorker.com/tag/edward-snowden)[NSA Scandal](https://www.newyorker.com/tag/nsa-scandal)[Politics](https://www.newyorker.com/tag/politics) ### The News & Politics Newsletter Read the latest from Washington and beyond, covering current events, the economy, and more, from our columnists and correspondents. Read More [![The Scandal of the Sharenting Economy](https://media.newyorker.com/photos/69d3f3dc72d7ac02c8a311fe/4:3/w_640%2Cc_limit/undefined)](https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-lede/the-scandal-of-the-sharenting-economy#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) The Lede [The Scandal of the Sharenting Economy](https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-lede/the-scandal-of-the-sharenting-economy#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) [![The Scandal of the Sharenting Economy](https://media.newyorker.com/photos/69d3f3dc72d7ac02c8a311fe/4:3/w_640%2Cc_limit/undefined)](https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-lede/the-scandal-of-the-sharenting-economy#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) As kidfluencers come of age, some may find the law an imperfect means of restitution for what was lost and broken in their childhoods. By Jessica Winter [![This Easter, an American Pope Confronts an American War](https://media.newyorker.com/photos/69cff5cf41cd209ca21621b3/4:3/w_640%2Cc_limit/undefined)](https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/this-easter-an-american-pope-confronts-an-american-war#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) The Lede [This Easter, an American Pope Confronts an American War](https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/this-easter-an-american-pope-confronts-an-american-war#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) [![This Easter, an American Pope Confronts an American War](https://media.newyorker.com/photos/69cff5cf41cd209ca21621b3/4:3/w_640%2Cc_limit/undefined)](https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/this-easter-an-american-pope-confronts-an-american-war#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) Last week, when asked if he had a message about the war in Iran for President Trump, Leo XIV said, “Hopefully, he’s looking for an off-ramp.” By Paul Elie [![At Synagogues, Tensions Are Boiling Over](https://media.newyorker.com/photos/69caea8825a8e5f0af05c1ff/4:3/w_640%2Cc_limit/undefined)](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/06/at-synagogues-tensions-are-boiling-over#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) Annals of Religion [At Synagogues, Tensions Are Boiling Over](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/06/at-synagogues-tensions-are-boiling-over#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) [![At Synagogues, Tensions Are Boiling Over](https://media.newyorker.com/photos/69caea8825a8e5f0af05c1ff/4:3/w_640%2Cc_limit/undefined)](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/06/at-synagogues-tensions-are-boiling-over#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) Disagreements about Gaza and Zionism have divided congregations. By Eyal Press [![Can Sponge Cities Save Us from the Coming Floods?](https://media.newyorker.com/photos/69cbf37b0ea09b19d037fbb9/4:3/w_640%2Cc_limit/undefined)](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/13/can-sponge-cities-save-us-from-the-coming-floods#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) The Control of Nature [Can Sponge Cities Save Us from the Coming Floods?](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/13/can-sponge-cities-save-us-from-the-coming-floods#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) [![Can Sponge Cities Save Us from the Coming Floods?](https://media.newyorker.com/photos/69cbf37b0ea09b19d037fbb9/4:3/w_640%2Cc_limit/undefined)](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/13/can-sponge-cities-save-us-from-the-coming-floods#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) As the planet gets warmer and the rains fall harder, the future of flood control is looking less like a wall and something more like a park. By Eric Klinenberg [![The Car-Crash Conspiracy](https://media.newyorker.com/photos/69d682cb091977b644c66b41/4:3/w_640%2Cc_limit/undefined)](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/20/the-car-crash-conspiracy#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) Inverted [The Car-Crash Conspiracy](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/20/the-car-crash-conspiracy#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) [![The Car-Crash Conspiracy](https://media.newyorker.com/photos/69d682cb091977b644c66b41/4:3/w_640%2Cc_limit/undefined)](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/20/the-car-crash-conspiracy#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) High-speed accidents, crooked lawyers, and poor people desperate for cash—it was the kind of scheme that could have been cooked up only in the Big Easy. By Patrick Radden Keefe [![How the Creator of “Beef” Got from Petty Feuds to Class Warfare](https://media.newyorker.com/photos/69e14ec74effa0a8ba0b9b6b/4:3/w_640%2Cc_limit/undefined)](https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-new-yorker-interview/how-the-creator-of-beef-got-from-petty-feuds-to-class-warfare#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) The New Yorker Interview [How the Creator of “Beef” Got from Petty Feuds to Class Warfare](https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-new-yorker-interview/how-the-creator-of-beef-got-from-petty-feuds-to-class-warfare#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) [![How the Creator of “Beef” Got from Petty Feuds to Class Warfare](https://media.newyorker.com/photos/69e14ec74effa0a8ba0b9b6b/4:3/w_640%2Cc_limit/undefined)](https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-new-yorker-interview/how-the-creator-of-beef-got-from-petty-feuds-to-class-warfare#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) Lee Sung Jin on tailoring dialogue to Oscar Isaac and Charles Melton, the differences between Korean and American élites, and making TV in an age of “all-gas, no-brakes capitalism.” By Inkoo Kang [![The Spurs Are the Most Exciting Team in the N.B.A.](https://media.newyorker.com/photos/69e3d7cb018d9d6eb794a11f/4:3/w_640%2Cc_limit/undefined)](https://www.newyorker.com/sports/sporting-scene/the-spurs-are-the-most-exciting-team-in-the-nba#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) The Sporting Scene [The Spurs Are the Most Exciting Team in the N.B.A.](https://www.newyorker.com/sports/sporting-scene/the-spurs-are-the-most-exciting-team-in-the-nba#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) [![The Spurs Are the Most Exciting Team in the N.B.A.](https://media.newyorker.com/photos/69e3d7cb018d9d6eb794a11f/4:3/w_640%2Cc_limit/undefined)](https://www.newyorker.com/sports/sporting-scene/the-spurs-are-the-most-exciting-team-in-the-nba#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) Despite a string of injuries, Victor Wembanyama, San Antonio’s star center, has helped energize a young, gifted roster. Is a championship on the horizon? By Louisa Thomas [![How Project Maven Put A.I. Into the Kill Chain](https://media.newyorker.com/photos/69de50a92a881951f07debef/4:3/w_640%2Cc_limit/undefined)](https://www.newyorker.com/books/under-review/how-project-maven-put-ai-into-the-kill-chain#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) Under Review [How Project Maven Put A.I. Into the Kill Chain](https://www.newyorker.com/books/under-review/how-project-maven-put-ai-into-the-kill-chain#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) [![How Project Maven Put A.I. Into the Kill Chain](https://media.newyorker.com/photos/69de50a92a881951f07debef/4:3/w_640%2Cc_limit/undefined)](https://www.newyorker.com/books/under-review/how-project-maven-put-ai-into-the-kill-chain#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) A new book charts the creation of a secretive system that automates warfare for the military. The progression from target identification to target destruction is four clicks. By Gideon Lewis-Kraus [![How the Guillotine Got Axed](https://media.newyorker.com/photos/69af36e6db1fb45b9bd4aa40/4:3/w_640%2Cc_limit/undefined)](https://www.newyorker.com/news/letter-from-europe/how-the-guillotine-got-axed#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) Letter from Europe [How the Guillotine Got Axed](https://www.newyorker.com/news/letter-from-europe/how-the-guillotine-got-axed#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) [![How the Guillotine Got Axed](https://media.newyorker.com/photos/69af36e6db1fb45b9bd4aa40/4:3/w_640%2Cc_limit/undefined)](https://www.newyorker.com/news/letter-from-europe/how-the-guillotine-got-axed#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) In the U.S., capital punishment is resurgent. What lessons can we glean from France’s successful campaign to abolish it? By Lauren Collins [![The South Texas Democrat Who Will Sing at Your Quinceañera](https://media.newyorker.com/photos/69dff3eff065b6a30852f5bf/4:3/w_640%2Cc_limit/undefined)](https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/the-south-texas-democrat-who-will-sing-at-your-quinceanera#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) The Lede [The South Texas Democrat Who Will Sing at Your Quinceañera](https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/the-south-texas-democrat-who-will-sing-at-your-quinceanera#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) [![The South Texas Democrat Who Will Sing at Your Quinceañera](https://media.newyorker.com/photos/69dff3eff065b6a30852f5bf/4:3/w_640%2Cc_limit/undefined)](https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/the-south-texas-democrat-who-will-sing-at-your-quinceanera#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) Bobby Pulido, a Tejano musician who’s trying to unseat a Republican in Congress, has turned some of his district’s splashiest parties into campaign stops. By Jesús Rodríguez [![What Would a Ground Invasion of Iran Look Like?](https://media.newyorker.com/photos/69d540c9c6104821fff67508/4:3/w_640%2Cc_limit/undefined)](https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/what-would-a-ground-invasion-of-iran-look-like#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) The Lede [What Would a Ground Invasion of Iran Look Like?](https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/what-would-a-ground-invasion-of-iran-look-like#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) [![What Would a Ground Invasion of Iran Look Like?](https://media.newyorker.com/photos/69d540c9c6104821fff67508/4:3/w_640%2Cc_limit/undefined)](https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/what-would-a-ground-invasion-of-iran-look-like#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) As a fragile ceasefire begins, Tehran is using lessons from the Iran-Iraq War to prepare for an American escalation. By Sudarsan Raghavan [![How the Internet Fringe Infiltrated Republican Politics](https://media.newyorker.com/photos/69cd3268f8f1289c024c57d1/4:3/w_640%2Cc_limit/undefined)](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/13/how-the-internet-fringe-infiltrated-republican-politics#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) The Political Scene [How the Internet Fringe Infiltrated Republican Politics](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/13/how-the-internet-fringe-infiltrated-republican-politics#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) [![How the Internet Fringe Infiltrated Republican Politics](https://media.newyorker.com/photos/69cd3268f8f1289c024c57d1/4:3/w_640%2Cc_limit/undefined)](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/13/how-the-internet-fringe-infiltrated-republican-politics#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_60c092e8-3a30-4a5c-b046-46289b31915e_closr_bktb) Inside the battle for the post-*MAGA* G.O.P. By Antonia Hitchens [![The New Yorker](https://www.newyorker.com/verso/static/thenewyorker-us/assets/logo-reverse.svg)](https://www.newyorker.com/) Sections - [News](https://www.newyorker.com/news) - [Books & Culture](https://www.newyorker.com/culture) - [Fiction & Poetry](https://www.newyorker.com/fiction-and-poetry) - [Humor & Cartoons](https://www.newyorker.com/humor) - [Magazine](https://www.newyorker.com/archive) - [Crossword](https://www.newyorker.com/crossword-puzzles-and-games) - [Video](https://www.newyorker.com/video) - [Podcasts](https://www.newyorker.com/podcast) - [100th Anniversary](https://www.newyorker.com/100) - [Goings On](https://www.newyorker.com/goings-on) More - [Manage Account](https://www.newyorker.com/account/profile) - [Shop The New Yorker](https://store.newyorker.com/) - [Buy Covers and Cartoons](https://condenaststore.com/art/new+yorker+covers) - [Condé Nast Store](https://condenaststore.com/conde-nast-brand/thenewyorker) - [Digital Access](https://www.newyorker.com/about/digital-access) - [Subscribe](https://www.newyorker.com/subscribe) - [Newsletters](https://www.newyorker.com/newsletter) - [Jigsaw Puzzle](https://www.newyorker.com/jigsaw) - [RSS](https://www.newyorker.com/about/feeds) - [Site Map](https://www.newyorker.com/sitemap) - [About](https://www.newyorker.com/about/us) - [Careers](https://www.newyorker.com/about/careers) - [Contact](https://www.newyorker.com/about/contact) - [F.A.Q.](https://www.newyorker.com/about/faq) - [Media Kit](https://www.condenast.com/advertising) - [Press](https://www.newyorker.com/about/press) - [Accessibility Help](https://www.newyorker.com/about/accessibility-help) - [User Agreement](https://www.condenast.com/user-agreement/) - [Privacy Policy](http://www.condenast.com/privacy-policy#privacypolicy) - [Your California Privacy Rights](http://www.condenast.com/privacy-policy#privacypolicy-california) © 2026 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. *The New Yorker* may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our Affiliate Partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Condé Nast. [Ad Choices](http://www.aboutads.info/) Your Privacy Choices
Readable Markdown
Conceivably, the fact that Uncle Sam is watching their Facebook and Google accounts could come as news to some dimwit would-be jihadis in foreign locales, prompting them to communicate in ways that are harder for the N.S.A. to track. But it will hardly surprise the organized terrorist groups, which already go to great lengths to avoid being monitored. Not for nothing did Osama bin Laden’s compound in Abbottabad go without a phone or Internet connection. Another Snowden leak, which Greenwald and the *Guardian* [published over the weekend](http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/08/nsa-boundless-informant-global-datamining), was a set of documents concerning another secret N.S.A. tracking program with an Orwellian name: “Boundless Informant.” Apparently designed to keep Snowden’s former bosses abreast of what sorts of data it was collecting around the world, the program unveiled the vast reach of the N.S.A.’s activities. In March, 2013, alone, the *Guardian* reported, the N.S.A. collected ninety-seven billion pieces of information from computer networks worldwide, and three billion of those pieces came from U.S.-based networks. It’s hardly surprising that the main targets for the N.S.A.’s data collection were Iran (fourteen billion pieces in that period) and Pakistan (more than thirteen billion), but countries such as Jordan, India, and Egypt, American allies all, may be a bit surprised to find themselves so high on the list. “We hack everyone everywhere,” Snowden told the *Guardian*. “We like to make a distinction between us and the others. But we are in almost every country in the world. We are not at war with these countries.” For most Americans, the main concern will be domestic spying, and the chronic lack of oversight that Snowden’s leaks have highlighted. In the years since 9/11, the spying agencies have been given great leeway to expand their activities, with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Court, which deals with legal requests from the agencies, and the congressional intelligence committees, which nominally oversees all of their activities, all too often acting as rubber stamps rather than proper watchdogs. Partly, that was due to lack of gumption and an eagerness to look tough on issues of counterterrorism. But it also reflected a lack of information. Just a couple of months ago, at a Senate hearing, Oregon Democrat Ron Wyden, one of the few legislators to sound any misgivings over the activities of the intelligence agencies, [asked Clapper](http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/video/2013/jun/07/privacy-wyden-clapper-nsa-video), “Does the N.S.A. collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?” To which Clapper replied: “No, sir.” (He added, “Not wittingly.”) At another hearing, General Keith Alexander, the director of the N.S.A., [denied fourteen times](http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2012/03/20/nsa-chief-denies-wireds-domestic-spying-story-fourteen-times-in-congressional-hearing/) that the agency had the technical capability to intercept e-mails and other online communications in the United States. Thanks to Snowden, and what he told the *Guardian* and the Washington *Post*, we now have cause to doubt the truth of this testimony. In [Snowden’s words](http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/09/nsa-whistleblower-edward-snowden-why): “The N.S.A. has built an infrastructure that allows it to intercept almost everything. With this capability, the vast majority of human communications are automatically ingested without targeting. If I wanted to see your emails or your wife’s phone, all I have to do is use intercepts. I can get your emails, passwords, phone records, credit cards.” Were Clapper and Alexander deliberately lying? If so, perhaps Snowden should be extradited to the United States and dragged into court—but only as part of a proceeding in which the two spymasters face charges of misleading Congress. I suppose you could make the argument that he is a naïve young man who didn’t fully understand the dangerous nature of the world in which we live. You could question his motives, and call him a publicity seeker, or an idiot. (Fleeing to Hong Kong wasn’t very smart.) But he doesn’t sound like an airhead; he sounds like that most awkward and infuriating of creatures—a man of conscience. “I don’t want to live in a society that does these sort of things,” he told Greenwald. “I do not want to live in a world where everything I do and say is recorded. That is not something I am willing to support or live under.” So what is Snowden’s real crime? Like Ellsberg, Vanunu, and Bradley Manning before him, he uncovered questionable activities that those in power would rather have kept secret. That’s the valuable role that whistle-blowers play in a free society, and it’s one that, in each individual case, should be weighed against the breach of trust they commit, and the potential harm their revelations can cause. In some instances, conceivably, the interests of the state should prevail. Here, though, the scales are clearly tipped in Snowden’s favor. I’ll leave [the last word](http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jun/10/edward-snowden-united-stasi-america) to Ellsberg, who, for revealing to the world that that Pentagon knew early on that the war in Vietnam was unwinnable, was described in some quarters as a communist and a traitor: “Snowden did what he did because he recognised the NSA’s surveillance programs for what they are: dangerous, unconstitutional activity. This wholesale invasion of Americans’ and foreign citizens’ privacy does not contribute to our security; it puts in danger the very liberties we’re trying to protect.” *Photograph by Philippe Lopez/AFP/Getty.* [\[\#image: /photos/59095103ebe912338a37265d\]](http://nyr.kr/12weKvf) [*Read more of our coverage of government surveillance programs.*](https://www.newyorker.com/search?qt=dismax&rows=10&sort=publishdate+desc%2C+score+desc&fixedDate=&query=%22NSA+Scandal%22&submit=Search&magOnly=on&bylquery=)
ML Classification
ML Categories
/Law_and_Government
53.8%
/News
47.7%
/News/Politics
44.7%
/Law_and_Government/Legal
38.0%
/News/Politics/Campaigns_and_Elections
33.7%
/Law_and_Government/Legal/Constitutional_Law_and_Civil_Rights
26.5%
/People_and_Society
18.9%
/People_and_Society/Social_Issues_and_Advocacy
15.9%
Raw JSON
{
    "/Law_and_Government": 538,
    "/News": 477,
    "/News/Politics": 447,
    "/Law_and_Government/Legal": 380,
    "/News/Politics/Campaigns_and_Elections": 337,
    "/Law_and_Government/Legal/Constitutional_Law_and_Civil_Rights": 265,
    "/People_and_Society": 189,
    "/People_and_Society/Social_Issues_and_Advocacy": 159
}
ML Page Types
/Article
99.7%
/Article/Opinion_Piece
70.4%
Raw JSON
{
    "/Article": 997,
    "/Article/Opinion_Piece": 704
}
ML Intent Types
Informational
99.9%
Raw JSON
{
    "Informational": 999
}
Content Metadata
Languageen-us
AuthorJohn Cassidy
Publish Time2013-06-10 12:38:15 (12 years ago)
Original Publish Time2013-06-10 12:38:15 (12 years ago)
RepublishedNo
Word Count (Total)2,098
Word Count (Content)865
Links
External Links40
Internal Links58
Technical SEO
Meta NofollowNo
Meta NoarchiveYes
JS RenderedYes
Redirect Targetnull
Performance
Download Time (ms)814
TTFB (ms)732
Download Size (bytes)110,334
Shard133 (laksa)
Root Hash16027205805525588333
Unparsed URLcom,newyorker!www,/news/john-cassidy/why-edward-snowden-is-a-hero s443