ℹ️ Skipped - page is already crawled
| Filter | Status | Condition | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| HTTP status | PASS | download_http_code = 200 | HTTP 200 |
| Age cutoff | PASS | download_stamp > now() - 6 MONTH | 0 months ago |
| History drop | PASS | isNull(history_drop_reason) | No drop reason |
| Spam/ban | PASS | fh_dont_index != 1 AND ml_spam_score = 0 | ml_spam_score=0 |
| Canonical | PASS | meta_canonical IS NULL OR = '' OR = src_unparsed | Not set |
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| URL | https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/whats-at-stake-in-a-viruss-name |
| Last Crawled | 2026-04-18 10:51:25 (1 day ago) |
| First Indexed | 2020-03-25 22:45:08 (6 years ago) |
| HTTP Status Code | 200 |
| Meta Title | Trump’s “Chinese Virus” and What’s at Stake in the Coronavirus’s Name | The New Yorker |
| Meta Description | Eren Orbey writes about the dangers of prejudice in the etymology of viruses and diseases, and how Donald Trump’s fixation on the Chinese origin of the coronavirus has encouraged anti-Asian bigotry. |
| Meta Canonical | null |
| Boilerpipe Text | In 2009, at the height of the H1N1 pandemic, a group of researchers in the U.S. and Canada decided to test whether public-health interventions might limit disease-induced prejudice along with disease itself. In one part of the study, members of both vaccinated and unvaccinated groups were asked to read an article that amplified the threats of the pandemic, then complete a survey that assessed their attitudes toward immigrants. The vaccinated subjects, it turned out, exhibited less prejudice than their unvaccinated counterparts. In another part of the study, the researchers determined that defining vaccination in terms of contamination—“the seasonal flu vaccine involves injecting people with the seasonal flu virus”—increased prejudice in subjects concerned about disease, whereas defining it in terms of protection—“the seasonal flu vaccine protects people from the seasonal flu virus”—had no such effect. Initiatives that minimize disease, the researchers concluded, might also end up minimizing discrimination.
Eula Biss cites this imperfect but telling research in “
On Immunity
,” her mesmerizing book about vaccination, which observes that an innate wariness of perceived out-groups—immigrants, ethnic minorities, people with visible disabilities—amounts to an ancient disease-prevention mechanism. Evolutionary psychologists refer to a “behavioral immune system” that attunes humans to physical differences or unfamiliar behavior, even when it poses no risk. This tendency peaks at moments of particular vulnerability: one study, from 2007, suggests that pregnant women exhibit more xenophobia than usual during the early stages of gestation. Biss quotes Susan Sontag, who wrote that syphilis “was the ‘French Pox’ to the English,
morbus Germanicus
to the Parisians, the Naples sickness to the Florentines, the Chinese disease to the Japanese.” It is no help that popular perceptions of disease depend on metaphors of foreign infiltration. As the anthropologist Emily Martin writes in “
Flexible Bodies
,” textbooks and magazines tend to depict the body as a site of warfare between “ruthless invaders and determined offenders.”
It was only a matter of time before
Donald Trump
enlisted such language to serve his nativist agenda. Although
COVID
-19, the disease caused by the
novel coronavirus
, has killed more than twenty thousand people and affected countries around the world, Trump’s fixation on its origins in Wuhan, China, has encouraged a rash of anti-Asian bigotry in the United States. Acknowledging such harassment during a White House briefing on Monday night, Trump urged the public to “protect our Asian-American community.” But this paltry call for tolerance does not compensate for the prejudice that he and other figures on the right have helped foment. This month, Trump has taken to referring to
COVID
-19 as the “Chinese virus,” presenting the label as a corrective to Beijing officials’ claims that the American military was the source of the outbreak. Countering misinformation, though, is hardly the same thing as implicating an entire people. Last week, an Asian-American journalist
reported
that a member of the President’s staff called
COVID
-19 the “kung flu” to her face. This Wednesday, the Washington
Post
reported
that representatives of the G-7 countries failed to agree on a joint statement about the pandemic, because the Trump Administration insisted on using the term “Wuhan virus.” “China is to blame, because the culture where people eat bats and snakes and dogs and things like that,” Senator John Cornyn, Republican of Texas,
said
in a recent videotaped interview, defending Trump’s label. “These viruses are transmitted from the animal to the people, and that’s why China has been the source of a lot of these viruses, like
SARS
, like
MERS
, the swine flu.”
Cornyn’s statement is startling in its ignorance—neither
MERS
, which stands for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, nor the 2009 strain of H1N1, the official name of the swine flu, is thought to have originated in China—but he is not wrong to connect Trump’s fearmongering nickname for the novel coronavirus to the stories of pandemics past. The history of disease offers numerous examples of how ill-chosen names can instigate undue prejudice toward particular ethnic or religious communities. In 2015, the World Health Organization
issued
a set of best practices for naming new infectious diseases, in order to reduce the potential for stigma. Its recommendations discouraged basing nomenclature on geographic locations (Japanese encephalitis), proper names (Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease), species of animals and food (monkeypox), or cultural and occupational references (Legionnaires’ disease). (The W.H.O. also warned against certain terms—“unknown,” “fatal,” “epidemic”—that incite unnecessary fear.) “This may seem like a trivial issue to some, but disease names really do matter to the people who are directly affected,” Keiji Fukuda, at the time the organization’s assistant director-general for health security, said in a statement. (It took the W.H.O. weeks to land on the name
COVID
-19, which stands for “coronavirus disease 2019.”)
Much of the old nomenclature has turned out to be not only stigmatizing but inaccurate. The Ebola virus, for instance, gets its name from a river that sits about forty miles from Yambuku, the Congolese village where researchers first investigated the disease, in 1976. In his memoir, “
No Time to Lose
,” Peter Piot, the doctor whose team worked toward the discovery of the virus, admits that they made a hasty decision while in an “entirely fatigued state,” choosing a natural landmark as an eponym to avoid risking the reputation of an entire country. (Piot later learned that he had a bad map: the Ebola River is not even the closest river to Yambuku.) The
Spanish flu
, which coincided with the First World War, was so named because Spain, which remained a neutral power, had no qualms about covering its outbreak, whereas Germany, France, the U.K., and the U.S. suppressed accounts to preserve public morale. (Most evidence suggests that Spain was not the first country to witness an outbreak, nor was it the hardest hit.) During the 2009 outbreak of H1N1, which came to be called the swine flu because it resembled other viruses that commonly affected pigs, pork farmers reported huge losses in their industry. Though the illness was likely developed through a combination of animals, China and Russia banned pork imports, and health officials in Egypt ordered the widespread culling of hundreds of thousands of pigs, ravaging the livelihood of the country’s swine farmers, almost all of whom were among the Christian minority. |
| Markdown | [Skip to main content](https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/whats-at-stake-in-a-viruss-name#main-content)
[](https://www.newyorker.com/)
- [Newsletter](https://www.newyorker.com/newsletters?sourceCode=navbar)
[Sign In](https://www.newyorker.com/auth/initiate?redirectURL=%2Fculture%2Fcultural-comment%2Fwhats-at-stake-in-a-viruss-name&source=VERSO_NAVIGATION)
Search
- [The Latest](https://www.newyorker.com/latest)
- [News](https://www.newyorker.com/news)
- [Books & Culture](https://www.newyorker.com/culture)
- [Fiction & Poetry](https://www.newyorker.com/fiction-and-poetry)
- [Humor & Cartoons](https://www.newyorker.com/humor)
- [Magazine](https://www.newyorker.com/archive)
- [Puzzles & Games](https://www.newyorker.com/crossword-puzzles-and-games)
- [Video](https://www.newyorker.com/video)
- [Podcasts](https://www.newyorker.com/podcasts)
- [Goings On](https://www.newyorker.com/goings-on)
- [Shop](https://store.newyorker.com/)
Open Navigation Menu
[](https://www.newyorker.com/)
[Cultural Comment](https://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment)
# Trump’s “Chinese Virus” and What’s at Stake in the Coronavirus’s Name
By [Eren Orbey](https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/eren-orbey)
March 25, 2020
In Donald Trump’s remarks during a press conference last week, “corona” was crossed out and replaced with “Chinese,” reflecting his fixation on the coronavirus’s origins.Photograph by Jabin Botsford / The Washington Post / Getty
Save this story
Save this story
In 2009, at the height of the H1N1 pandemic, a group of researchers in the U.S. and Canada decided to test whether public-health interventions might limit disease-induced prejudice along with disease itself. In one part of the study, members of both vaccinated and unvaccinated groups were asked to read an article that amplified the threats of the pandemic, then complete a survey that assessed their attitudes toward immigrants. The vaccinated subjects, it turned out, exhibited less prejudice than their unvaccinated counterparts. In another part of the study, the researchers determined that defining vaccination in terms of contamination—“the seasonal flu vaccine involves injecting people with the seasonal flu virus”—increased prejudice in subjects concerned about disease, whereas defining it in terms of protection—“the seasonal flu vaccine protects people from the seasonal flu virus”—had no such effect. Initiatives that minimize disease, the researchers concluded, might also end up minimizing discrimination.
Eula Biss cites this imperfect but telling research in “[On Immunity](https://www.amazon.com/Immunity-Inoculation-Eula-Biss/dp/1555977200),” her mesmerizing book about vaccination, which observes that an innate wariness of perceived out-groups—immigrants, ethnic minorities, people with visible disabilities—amounts to an ancient disease-prevention mechanism. Evolutionary psychologists refer to a “behavioral immune system” that attunes humans to physical differences or unfamiliar behavior, even when it poses no risk. This tendency peaks at moments of particular vulnerability: one study, from 2007, suggests that pregnant women exhibit more xenophobia than usual during the early stages of gestation. Biss quotes Susan Sontag, who wrote that syphilis “was the ‘French Pox’ to the English, *morbus Germanicus* to the Parisians, the Naples sickness to the Florentines, the Chinese disease to the Japanese.” It is no help that popular perceptions of disease depend on metaphors of foreign infiltration. As the anthropologist Emily Martin writes in “[Flexible Bodies](https://www.amazon.com/Flexible-Bodies-Emily-Martin/dp/0807046272),” textbooks and magazines tend to depict the body as a site of warfare between “ruthless invaders and determined offenders.”
[Read *The New Yorker’s* complete news coverage and analysis of the coronavirus pandemic.](https://www.newyorker.com/tag/coronavirus)
It was only a matter of time before [Donald Trump](https://www.newyorker.com/tag/donald-trump) enlisted such language to serve his nativist agenda. Although *COVID*\-19, the disease caused by the [novel coronavirus](https://www.newyorker.com/tag/coronavirus), has killed more than twenty thousand people and affected countries around the world, Trump’s fixation on its origins in Wuhan, China, has encouraged a rash of anti-Asian bigotry in the United States. Acknowledging such harassment during a White House briefing on Monday night, Trump urged the public to “protect our Asian-American community.” But this paltry call for tolerance does not compensate for the prejudice that he and other figures on the right have helped foment. This month, Trump has taken to referring to *COVID*\-19 as the “Chinese virus,” presenting the label as a corrective to Beijing officials’ claims that the American military was the source of the outbreak. Countering misinformation, though, is hardly the same thing as implicating an entire people. Last week, an Asian-American journalist [reported](https://twitter.com/weijia/status/1239923246801334283) that a member of the President’s staff called *COVID*\-19 the “kung flu” to her face. This Wednesday, the Washington *Post* [reported](https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/g-7-failed-to-agree-on-statement-after-us-insisted-on-calling-coronavirus-outbreak-wuhan-virus/2020/03/25/f2bc7a02-6ed3-11ea-96a0-df4c5d9284af_story.html) that representatives of the G-7 countries failed to agree on a joint statement about the pandemic, because the Trump Administration insisted on using the term “Wuhan virus.” “China is to blame, because the culture where people eat bats and snakes and dogs and things like that,” Senator John Cornyn, Republican of Texas, [said](https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1240364608390606850) in a recent videotaped interview, defending Trump’s label. “These viruses are transmitted from the animal to the people, and that’s why China has been the source of a lot of these viruses, like *SARS*, like *MERS*, the swine flu.”
Video From The New Yorker
[Swift Justice: A Taliban Courtroom in Session](https://www.newyorker.com/video/watch/the-new-yorker-documentary-swift-justice-a-taliban-courtroom-in-session)
Cornyn’s statement is startling in its ignorance—neither *MERS*, which stands for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, nor the 2009 strain of H1N1, the official name of the swine flu, is thought to have originated in China—but he is not wrong to connect Trump’s fearmongering nickname for the novel coronavirus to the stories of pandemics past. The history of disease offers numerous examples of how ill-chosen names can instigate undue prejudice toward particular ethnic or religious communities. In 2015, the World Health Organization [issued](https://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/notes/2015/naming-new-diseases/en/) a set of best practices for naming new infectious diseases, in order to reduce the potential for stigma. Its recommendations discouraged basing nomenclature on geographic locations (Japanese encephalitis), proper names (Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease), species of animals and food (monkeypox), or cultural and occupational references (Legionnaires’ disease). (The W.H.O. also warned against certain terms—“unknown,” “fatal,” “epidemic”—that incite unnecessary fear.) “This may seem like a trivial issue to some, but disease names really do matter to the people who are directly affected,” Keiji Fukuda, at the time the organization’s assistant director-general for health security, said in a statement. (It took the W.H.O. weeks to land on the name *COVID*\-19, which stands for “coronavirus disease 2019.”)
Much of the old nomenclature has turned out to be not only stigmatizing but inaccurate. The Ebola virus, for instance, gets its name from a river that sits about forty miles from Yambuku, the Congolese village where researchers first investigated the disease, in 1976. In his memoir, “[No Time to Lose](https://www.amazon.com/No-Time-Lose-Pursuit-Viruses/dp/0393345513),” Peter Piot, the doctor whose team worked toward the discovery of the virus, admits that they made a hasty decision while in an “entirely fatigued state,” choosing a natural landmark as an eponym to avoid risking the reputation of an entire country. (Piot later learned that he had a bad map: the Ebola River is not even the closest river to Yambuku.) The [Spanish flu](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1997/09/29/the-dead-zone), which coincided with the First World War, was so named because Spain, which remained a neutral power, had no qualms about covering its outbreak, whereas Germany, France, the U.K., and the U.S. suppressed accounts to preserve public morale. (Most evidence suggests that Spain was not the first country to witness an outbreak, nor was it the hardest hit.) During the 2009 outbreak of H1N1, which came to be called the swine flu because it resembled other viruses that commonly affected pigs, pork farmers reported huge losses in their industry. Though the illness was likely developed through a combination of animals, China and Russia banned pork imports, and health officials in Egypt ordered the widespread culling of hundreds of thousands of pigs, ravaging the livelihood of the country’s swine farmers, almost all of whom were among the Christian minority.
In the U.S., perhaps no disease better illustrates the perils of disease naming than *AIDS*, which, in its early days, was sometimes called “gay cancer.” Epidemiologists have argued that this label exacerbated the government’s disastrous response, allowing officials to recast the outbreak as a “niche liberal issue,” in the words of one study, rather than the epidemic that it remains today. The comparison between *COVID*\-19 and *AIDS* is imperfect at best: for one thing, the American government delayed confronting the *AIDS* epidemic for years, not weeks. Still, it’s hard not to see a similarity between the recent reports of harassment against Asian-Americans and the stigmatization that gay people suffered in the wake of the *AIDS* outbreak. Carol Goldin, a researcher at Rutgers University, wrote, in 1994, that aligning any disease so closely with a single group “allows the rest of society to simultaneously assign blame, and, through contrast, define their own innocence.” This, she added, is not simply a civil-rights issue but “a serious health threat”: it allows those outside of the targeted group to consider themselves exempt from risk.
It’s not clear that anyone, anywhere in the world, can at this point reasonably claim exemption from the threat of *COVID*\-19, least of all the countless Americans flouting the social-distancing measures intended to protect them and their communities. The terror of Trump’s finger-pointing is not only that it will surely exacerbate the misdirected anger and violence against Asians and Asian-Americans; it’s that his jingoism undermines the collective effort that’s essential to slowing the virus’s spread. In her book, Biss likens immunity to “a garden we tend together,” urging readers to acknowledge that we owe our health, in part, to one another. Overcoming a pandemic, let alone preventing it, requires a mutual interdependence that is inimical to Trump’s world view. Last Thursday, a photographer from the Washington *Post* captured an image of a printout of the President’s remarks from a press conference; on the page, “corona” was crossed out with a black marker, replaced with the word “Chinese.” As the crisis worsens in the weeks to come, this image will stand as a small but apt encapsulation of our President’s pathologically misplaced priorities.
***
## A Guide to the Coronavirus
- How to practice [social distancing](https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/the-vital-importance-of-isolation?itm_content=footer-recirc), from responding to a sick housemate to the pros and cons of ordering food.
- How people cope and [create new customs](https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/coping-camaraderie-and-human-evolution-amid-the-coronavirus-crisis?itm_content=footer-recirc) amid a pandemic.
- What it means to [contain and mitigate](https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/what-it-means-to-contain-and-mitigate-the-coronavirus?itm_content=footer-recirc) the coronavirus outbreak.
- How much of the world is [likely to be quarantined](https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/how-much-of-the-world-will-be-quarantined-by-the-coronavirus?itm_content=footer-recirc)?
- Donald Trump in [the time of coronavirus](https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/trump-in-the-time-of-the-coronavirus?itm_content=footer-recirc).
- The coronavirus is [likely to spread for more than a year](https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/how-long-will-it-take-to-develop-a-coronavirus-vaccine?itm_content=footer-recirc) before a vaccine could be widely available.
- We are all [irrational panic shoppers](https://www.newyorker.com/culture/annals-of-gastronomy/we-are-all-irrational-panic-shoppers?itm_content=footer-recirc).
- The strange terror of [watching the coronavirus take Rome](https://www.newyorker.com/news/dispatch/the-strange-terror-of-watching-coronavirus-take-rome?itm_content=footer-recirc).
- How pandemics [change history](https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/how-pandemics-change-history?itm_content=footer-recirc).
[](https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/eren-orbey)
[Eren Orbey](https://www.newyorker.com/contributors/eren-orbey), a contributing writer, has been writing for The New Yorker since 2016.
More:[Coronavirus](https://www.newyorker.com/tag/coronavirus)[Diseases](https://www.newyorker.com/tag/diseases)[Etymology](https://www.newyorker.com/tag/etymology)[Donald Trump](https://www.newyorker.com/tag/donald-trump)[Prejudice](https://www.newyorker.com/tag/prejudice)[Bigotry](https://www.newyorker.com/tag/bigotry)
### The Goings On Newsletter
What we're watching, listening to, and doing this week in N.Y.C, and beyond
Read More
[](https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/how-loneliness-from-coronavirus-isolation-takes-its-own-toll)
Coronavirus
[How Loneliness from Coronavirus Isolation Takes Its Toll](https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/how-loneliness-from-coronavirus-isolation-takes-its-own-toll)
[](https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/how-loneliness-from-coronavirus-isolation-takes-its-own-toll)
“Just like we’re worried about an economic recession, we should worry about a social recession,” a neuroscientist says.
By Robin Wright
[](https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/how-to-talk-to-coronavirus-skeptics)
Q. & A.
[How to Talk to Coronavirus Skeptics](https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/how-to-talk-to-coronavirus-skeptics)
[](https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/how-to-talk-to-coronavirus-skeptics)
A science historian discusses the Trump Administration’s slow response to the pandemic and strategies for convincing doubters that the threat of the coronavirus is real.
By Isaac Chotiner
[](https://www.newyorker.com/video/watch/the-coronavirus-s-impact-on-chinatown)
Video
[The Coronavirus’s Impact on Chinatown](https://www.newyorker.com/video/watch/the-coronavirus-s-impact-on-chinatown)
[](https://www.newyorker.com/video/watch/the-coronavirus-s-impact-on-chinatown)
In the days before all restaurants were ordered to be take-out or delivery only, the New Yorker staff writer Jiayang Fan visited her favorite Chinatown establishments to see how they were faring.
[](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/06/at-synagogues-tensions-are-boiling-over#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_11114393-a35b-40e9-995d-6b8a323d4a42_closr_bkta)
Annals of Religion
[At Synagogues, Tensions Are Boiling Over](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/06/at-synagogues-tensions-are-boiling-over#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_11114393-a35b-40e9-995d-6b8a323d4a42_closr_bkta)
[](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/06/at-synagogues-tensions-are-boiling-over#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_11114393-a35b-40e9-995d-6b8a323d4a42_closr_bkta)
Disagreements about Gaza and Zionism have divided congregations.
By Eyal Press
[](https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/the-forest-service-a-force-across-rural-america-reorganizes-under-trump#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_11114393-a35b-40e9-995d-6b8a323d4a42_closr_bkta)
The Lede
[The Forest Service “Reorganizes” Under Trump](https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/the-forest-service-a-force-across-rural-america-reorganizes-under-trump#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_11114393-a35b-40e9-995d-6b8a323d4a42_closr_bkta)
[](https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/the-forest-service-a-force-across-rural-america-reorganizes-under-trump#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_11114393-a35b-40e9-995d-6b8a323d4a42_closr_bkta)
The agency has been a force across rural America. The changes will make lots of room for lumber lobbyists, less for forest science.
By Bill McKibben
[](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/20/the-car-crash-conspiracy#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_11114393-a35b-40e9-995d-6b8a323d4a42_closr_bkta)
Inverted
[The Car-Crash Conspiracy](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/20/the-car-crash-conspiracy#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_11114393-a35b-40e9-995d-6b8a323d4a42_closr_bkta)
[](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/20/the-car-crash-conspiracy#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_11114393-a35b-40e9-995d-6b8a323d4a42_closr_bkta)
High-speed accidents, crooked lawyers, and poor people desperate for cash—it was the kind of scheme that could have been cooked up only in the Big Easy.
By Patrick Radden Keefe
[](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/20/the-return-of-family-detention#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_11114393-a35b-40e9-995d-6b8a323d4a42_closr_bkta)
Annals of Immigration
[The Return of Family Detention](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/20/the-return-of-family-detention#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_11114393-a35b-40e9-995d-6b8a323d4a42_closr_bkta)
[](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/20/the-return-of-family-detention#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_11114393-a35b-40e9-995d-6b8a323d4a42_closr_bkta)
Under the Trump Administration, thousands of immigrant children have been detained, and many have suffered from medical neglect.
By Sarah Stillman
[](https://www.newyorker.com/news/letter-from-trumps-washington/americas-orange-jesus#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_11114393-a35b-40e9-995d-6b8a323d4a42_closr_bkta)
Letter from Trump’s Washington
[America’s Orange Jesus](https://www.newyorker.com/news/letter-from-trumps-washington/americas-orange-jesus#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_11114393-a35b-40e9-995d-6b8a323d4a42_closr_bkta)
[](https://www.newyorker.com/news/letter-from-trumps-washington/americas-orange-jesus#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_11114393-a35b-40e9-995d-6b8a323d4a42_closr_bkta)
Reflections on a week in which Donald Trump decided to feud with the Pope while comparing himself to the Saviour.
By Susan B. Glasser
[](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/03/30/is-cuba-next#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_11114393-a35b-40e9-995d-6b8a323d4a42_closr_bkta)
Letter from Havana
[Is Cuba Next?](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/03/30/is-cuba-next#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_11114393-a35b-40e9-995d-6b8a323d4a42_closr_bkta)
[](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/03/30/is-cuba-next#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_11114393-a35b-40e9-995d-6b8a323d4a42_closr_bkta)
Trump’s campaign to topple foreign adversaries encounters a battered but defiant regime.
By Jon Lee Anderson
[](https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/the-long-odds-of-undoing-birthright-citizenship#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_11114393-a35b-40e9-995d-6b8a323d4a42_closr_bkta)
The Lede
[The Long Odds of Undoing Birthright Citizenship](https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/the-long-odds-of-undoing-birthright-citizenship#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_11114393-a35b-40e9-995d-6b8a323d4a42_closr_bkta)
[](https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/the-long-odds-of-undoing-birthright-citizenship#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_11114393-a35b-40e9-995d-6b8a323d4a42_closr_bkta)
In arguments at the Supreme Court, a clear majority of the Justices seemed inclined to uphold the right.
By Ruth Marcus
[](https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/what-brought-down-eric-swalwell#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_11114393-a35b-40e9-995d-6b8a323d4a42_closr_bkta)
The Lede
[What Brought Down Eric Swalwell](https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/what-brought-down-eric-swalwell#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_11114393-a35b-40e9-995d-6b8a323d4a42_closr_bkta)
[](https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-lede/what-brought-down-eric-swalwell#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_11114393-a35b-40e9-995d-6b8a323d4a42_closr_bkta)
How the attention economy produced a moment of congressional reckoning.
By Jon Allsop
[](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/13/how-the-internet-fringe-infiltrated-republican-politics#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_11114393-a35b-40e9-995d-6b8a323d4a42_closr_bkta)
The Political Scene
[How the Internet Fringe Infiltrated Republican Politics](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/13/how-the-internet-fringe-infiltrated-republican-politics#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_11114393-a35b-40e9-995d-6b8a323d4a42_closr_bkta)
[](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/13/how-the-internet-fringe-infiltrated-republican-politics#intcid=recommendations_the-new-yorker-article-bottom-recirc-personalized_11114393-a35b-40e9-995d-6b8a323d4a42_closr_bkta)
Inside the battle for the post-*MAGA* G.O.P.
By Antonia Hitchens
[](https://www.newyorker.com/)
Sections
- [News](https://www.newyorker.com/news)
- [Books & Culture](https://www.newyorker.com/culture)
- [Fiction & Poetry](https://www.newyorker.com/fiction-and-poetry)
- [Humor & Cartoons](https://www.newyorker.com/humor)
- [Magazine](https://www.newyorker.com/archive)
- [Crossword](https://www.newyorker.com/crossword-puzzles-and-games)
- [Video](https://www.newyorker.com/video)
- [Podcasts](https://www.newyorker.com/podcast)
- [100th Anniversary](https://www.newyorker.com/100)
- [Goings On](https://www.newyorker.com/goings-on)
More
- [Manage Account](https://www.newyorker.com/account/profile)
- [Shop The New Yorker](https://store.newyorker.com/)
- [Buy Covers and Cartoons](https://condenaststore.com/art/new+yorker+covers)
- [Condé Nast Store](https://condenaststore.com/conde-nast-brand/thenewyorker)
- [Digital Access](https://www.newyorker.com/about/digital-access)
- [Subscribe](https://www.newyorker.com/subscribe)
- [Newsletters](https://www.newyorker.com/newsletter)
- [Jigsaw Puzzle](https://www.newyorker.com/jigsaw)
- [RSS](https://www.newyorker.com/about/feeds)
- [Site Map](https://www.newyorker.com/sitemap)
- [About](https://www.newyorker.com/about/us)
- [Careers](https://www.newyorker.com/about/careers)
- [Contact](https://www.newyorker.com/about/contact)
- [F.A.Q.](https://www.newyorker.com/about/faq)
- [Media Kit](https://www.condenast.com/advertising)
- [Press](https://www.newyorker.com/about/press)
- [Accessibility Help](https://www.newyorker.com/about/accessibility-help)
- [User Agreement](https://www.condenast.com/user-agreement/)
- [Privacy Policy](http://www.condenast.com/privacy-policy#privacypolicy)
- [Your California Privacy Rights](http://www.condenast.com/privacy-policy#privacypolicy-california)
© 2026 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. *The New Yorker* may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our Affiliate Partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Condé Nast. [Ad Choices](http://www.aboutads.info/)
Your Privacy Choices |
| Readable Markdown | In 2009, at the height of the H1N1 pandemic, a group of researchers in the U.S. and Canada decided to test whether public-health interventions might limit disease-induced prejudice along with disease itself. In one part of the study, members of both vaccinated and unvaccinated groups were asked to read an article that amplified the threats of the pandemic, then complete a survey that assessed their attitudes toward immigrants. The vaccinated subjects, it turned out, exhibited less prejudice than their unvaccinated counterparts. In another part of the study, the researchers determined that defining vaccination in terms of contamination—“the seasonal flu vaccine involves injecting people with the seasonal flu virus”—increased prejudice in subjects concerned about disease, whereas defining it in terms of protection—“the seasonal flu vaccine protects people from the seasonal flu virus”—had no such effect. Initiatives that minimize disease, the researchers concluded, might also end up minimizing discrimination.
Eula Biss cites this imperfect but telling research in “[On Immunity](https://www.amazon.com/Immunity-Inoculation-Eula-Biss/dp/1555977200),” her mesmerizing book about vaccination, which observes that an innate wariness of perceived out-groups—immigrants, ethnic minorities, people with visible disabilities—amounts to an ancient disease-prevention mechanism. Evolutionary psychologists refer to a “behavioral immune system” that attunes humans to physical differences or unfamiliar behavior, even when it poses no risk. This tendency peaks at moments of particular vulnerability: one study, from 2007, suggests that pregnant women exhibit more xenophobia than usual during the early stages of gestation. Biss quotes Susan Sontag, who wrote that syphilis “was the ‘French Pox’ to the English, *morbus Germanicus* to the Parisians, the Naples sickness to the Florentines, the Chinese disease to the Japanese.” It is no help that popular perceptions of disease depend on metaphors of foreign infiltration. As the anthropologist Emily Martin writes in “[Flexible Bodies](https://www.amazon.com/Flexible-Bodies-Emily-Martin/dp/0807046272),” textbooks and magazines tend to depict the body as a site of warfare between “ruthless invaders and determined offenders.”
It was only a matter of time before [Donald Trump](https://www.newyorker.com/tag/donald-trump) enlisted such language to serve his nativist agenda. Although *COVID*\-19, the disease caused by the [novel coronavirus](https://www.newyorker.com/tag/coronavirus), has killed more than twenty thousand people and affected countries around the world, Trump’s fixation on its origins in Wuhan, China, has encouraged a rash of anti-Asian bigotry in the United States. Acknowledging such harassment during a White House briefing on Monday night, Trump urged the public to “protect our Asian-American community.” But this paltry call for tolerance does not compensate for the prejudice that he and other figures on the right have helped foment. This month, Trump has taken to referring to *COVID*\-19 as the “Chinese virus,” presenting the label as a corrective to Beijing officials’ claims that the American military was the source of the outbreak. Countering misinformation, though, is hardly the same thing as implicating an entire people. Last week, an Asian-American journalist [reported](https://twitter.com/weijia/status/1239923246801334283) that a member of the President’s staff called *COVID*\-19 the “kung flu” to her face. This Wednesday, the Washington *Post* [reported](https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/g-7-failed-to-agree-on-statement-after-us-insisted-on-calling-coronavirus-outbreak-wuhan-virus/2020/03/25/f2bc7a02-6ed3-11ea-96a0-df4c5d9284af_story.html) that representatives of the G-7 countries failed to agree on a joint statement about the pandemic, because the Trump Administration insisted on using the term “Wuhan virus.” “China is to blame, because the culture where people eat bats and snakes and dogs and things like that,” Senator John Cornyn, Republican of Texas, [said](https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1240364608390606850) in a recent videotaped interview, defending Trump’s label. “These viruses are transmitted from the animal to the people, and that’s why China has been the source of a lot of these viruses, like *SARS*, like *MERS*, the swine flu.”
Cornyn’s statement is startling in its ignorance—neither *MERS*, which stands for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, nor the 2009 strain of H1N1, the official name of the swine flu, is thought to have originated in China—but he is not wrong to connect Trump’s fearmongering nickname for the novel coronavirus to the stories of pandemics past. The history of disease offers numerous examples of how ill-chosen names can instigate undue prejudice toward particular ethnic or religious communities. In 2015, the World Health Organization [issued](https://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/notes/2015/naming-new-diseases/en/) a set of best practices for naming new infectious diseases, in order to reduce the potential for stigma. Its recommendations discouraged basing nomenclature on geographic locations (Japanese encephalitis), proper names (Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease), species of animals and food (monkeypox), or cultural and occupational references (Legionnaires’ disease). (The W.H.O. also warned against certain terms—“unknown,” “fatal,” “epidemic”—that incite unnecessary fear.) “This may seem like a trivial issue to some, but disease names really do matter to the people who are directly affected,” Keiji Fukuda, at the time the organization’s assistant director-general for health security, said in a statement. (It took the W.H.O. weeks to land on the name *COVID*\-19, which stands for “coronavirus disease 2019.”)
Much of the old nomenclature has turned out to be not only stigmatizing but inaccurate. The Ebola virus, for instance, gets its name from a river that sits about forty miles from Yambuku, the Congolese village where researchers first investigated the disease, in 1976. In his memoir, “[No Time to Lose](https://www.amazon.com/No-Time-Lose-Pursuit-Viruses/dp/0393345513),” Peter Piot, the doctor whose team worked toward the discovery of the virus, admits that they made a hasty decision while in an “entirely fatigued state,” choosing a natural landmark as an eponym to avoid risking the reputation of an entire country. (Piot later learned that he had a bad map: the Ebola River is not even the closest river to Yambuku.) The [Spanish flu](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1997/09/29/the-dead-zone), which coincided with the First World War, was so named because Spain, which remained a neutral power, had no qualms about covering its outbreak, whereas Germany, France, the U.K., and the U.S. suppressed accounts to preserve public morale. (Most evidence suggests that Spain was not the first country to witness an outbreak, nor was it the hardest hit.) During the 2009 outbreak of H1N1, which came to be called the swine flu because it resembled other viruses that commonly affected pigs, pork farmers reported huge losses in their industry. Though the illness was likely developed through a combination of animals, China and Russia banned pork imports, and health officials in Egypt ordered the widespread culling of hundreds of thousands of pigs, ravaging the livelihood of the country’s swine farmers, almost all of whom were among the Christian minority. |
| Shard | 133 (laksa) |
| Root Hash | 16027205805525588333 |
| Unparsed URL | com,newyorker!www,/culture/cultural-comment/whats-at-stake-in-a-viruss-name s443 |