🕷️ Crawler Inspector

URL Lookup

Direct Parameter Lookup

Raw Queries and Responses

1. Shard Calculation

Query:
Response:
Calculated Shard: 16 (from laksa063)

2. Crawled Status Check

Query:
Response:

3. Robots.txt Check

Query:
Response:

4. Spam/Ban Check

Query:
Response:

5. Seen Status Check

ℹ️ Skipped - page is already crawled

📄
INDEXABLE
CRAWLED
5 months ago
🤖
ROBOTS ALLOWED

Page Info Filters

FilterStatusConditionDetails
HTTP statusPASSdownload_http_code = 200HTTP 200
Age cutoffPASSdownload_stamp > now() - 6 MONTH5.2 months ago
History dropPASSisNull(history_drop_reason)No drop reason
Spam/banPASSfh_dont_index != 1 AND ml_spam_score = 0ml_spam_score=0
CanonicalPASSmeta_canonical IS NULL OR = '' OR = src_unparsedNot set

Page Details

PropertyValue
URLhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274
Last Crawled2025-11-12 05:12:40 (5 months ago)
First Indexed2020-08-06 08:22:58 (5 years ago)
HTTP Status Code200
Meta TitlePartitioning the Curve — Interstate Travel Restrictions During the Covid-19 Pandemic | New England Journal of Medicine
Meta DescriptionMany jurisdictions have responded to the unevenness of the unfolding Covid-19 pandemic by battening down their borders. But within the United States, attempts to restrict interstate travel present ...
Meta Canonicalnull
Boilerpipe Text
Since the onset of the Covid-19 crisis in the United States, government action taken to “flatten” the curve of disease transmission has varied dramatically among states, counties, and cities. The early epicenters — New York City, Washington State, and the San Francisco Bay Area — implemented aggressive measures in mid-March, many of which remain in place. Other states and localities opted for milder restrictions, acted much later, or barely intervened at all. Many states began unwinding restrictions weeks ago, although surging case numbers are prompting some to change course. The patchwork nature of the response helps explain the current situation: Covid-19’s spread now has many different trajectories, which partly track jurisdictional boundaries. In the third week of July, for example, Covid-19 incidence was 10 times as high in some states as in others. Many jurisdictions have responded to the unevenness of the unfolding pandemic by battening down their borders. Nearly half the states have imposed interstate travel restrictions to date (see graph ). Eight have imposed restrictions on entrants from all states, 12 have imposed them only on entrants from selected high-prevalence areas, and 4 have shifted between these positions. A common feature of these orders is a requirement that entrants — both residents and nonresidents — self-quarantine for 14 days, although news reports suggest that states are not actively monitoring compliance. Several states recently modified their orders to permit proof of negative tests for Covid-19 infection in lieu of self-quarantine. A stark illustration of the shifting geographic dynamics is that some states, such as Florida and Texas, that months ago targeted “fugitives” from Covid-19 hotspots in the Northeast now find the tables turned. Other federations have turned to controls on movement, too. Interprovincial travel restrictions have been a prominent feature of the Covid-19 response in Canada; they are beginning to give way to other arrangements, such as the “Atlantic bubble,” a regional pact that lowers travel barriers across Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland and Labrador. Four of Australia’s eight states and territories are currently restricting all domestic entrants, three restrict entrants from certain states, and one maintains an open border. In Germany, the federal and state governments have agreed to frame travel bans around small, local areas of outbreaks within states. In the United States, attempts to restrict interstate travel present distinctive legal issues. The U.S. Supreme Court has long recognized an implicit constitutional right to travel, consisting of three elements: the right to enter and leave a state, the right “to be treated as a welcome visitor rather than an unfriendly alien” when visiting a state, and the right to become a citizen of any state. 1 The first element is among the liberty interests protected by the due process clauses of the 5th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution; the second and third elements are grounded in the privileges and immunities clause of Article IV. When laws infringing the right to travel across state lines are challenged in court, they are usually subjected to heightened scrutiny: courts uphold them only if they serve an important government interest (variously described as “substantial” or “compelling”) and are “narrowly tailored” — meaning that the government’s purpose cannot feasibly be achieved through less restrictive means. The Supreme Court has never explained the nature and extent of the right to travel during a natural disaster or public health crisis. Precedent upholding state and local governments’ authority to quarantine incoming ships (domestic and foreign) for health reasons is relevant but predates modern right-to-travel cases. 2 Courts could choose to apply no greater judicial scrutiny than they do to many other legal measures adopted to fight contagious diseases; following the seminal holding in Jacobson v. Massachusetts , courts typically ask only whether such measures are reasonable and necessary. But it seems more likely that courts will choose the heightened scrutiny they have applied to public health orders affecting specially protected rights, such as church attendance and abortion access. Indeed, two federal trial courts have recently done just that in Covid-19 right-to-travel cases, with different results. One court suspended Kentucky’s orders that residents and nonresidents entering the state must self-quarantine for 14 days, finding them overbroad. 3 In a poorly reasoned opinion, the court simply assumed that a less restrictive alternative existed, without indicating what it was. Nor did the court address the state’s arguments that the orders were time limited, included some exceptions, didn’t affect intrastate travel, and could be no narrower because Covid-19 conditions were constantly changing in other states. In Maine, an alliance of campground and restaurant owners and prospective visitors challenged the state’s mandatory self-quarantine for incoming travelers, which applied to both residents and nonresidents. The court turned away the plaintiffs’ request for a preliminary injunction, noting that the less restrictive alternatives they offered were “unworkable.” 4 However, the court expressed openness to hearing additional evidence about alternatives as the suit progressed. In a third lawsuit, three U.S. mainland residents who own property in Hawaii and one Hawaii resident have challenged that state’s mandatory self-quarantine of all entrants. The U.S. Department of Justice has intervened with a “statement of interest” supporting the plaintiffs, as it did in the Maine case. The nub of the federal government’s argument is that these states’ rules could have been crafted less restrictively; they could have been applied only to visitors from Covid-19 hotspots or exempted visitors who tested negative for or had recovered from Covid-19. On July 2, a federal district court judge rejected this argument. 5 Applying the more lenient standard of review from Jacobson , the court found ample evidence that the restrictions were justified by the emergency at hand and concluded that it would reach the same result applying heightened scrutiny. The same judge invoked similar reasoning on July 22 to reject another attempt at suspending Hawaii’s travel restrictions; she noted that the spike in Covid-19 cases and deaths since early July had made the case for requiring entrants to self-quarantine even stronger. Notably, the orders challenged to date have applied to residents as well as nonresidents entering the state. Even so, the court that initially upheld Maine’s order was persuaded that it discriminated against out-of-state residents in practice because visitors who don’t own a home in Maine would have greater difficulty self-quarantining. This finding matters because when states treat out-of-state travelers differently, they confront greater constitutional uncertainty than when their regulations affect residents and nonresidents even-handedly. Courts are mindful that, historically, differential travel restrictions have served as a pretext for turning away minorities or impoverished people and for economic protectionism. Courts also tend to be more skeptical when exceptions are granted to some interests and activities but not to other, similar ones. In sum, states seeking to impose interstate travel restrictions must navigate a very uncertain legal path, aiming for rules that are neither over- nor under-inclusive. Nevertheless, basic legal principles suggest that travel restrictions stand the best chance of withstanding constitutional scrutiny if they apply equally to residents and nonresidents, allow well-justified exceptions (e.g., for people with recent negative SARS-CoV-2 tests), are time limited and regularly reviewed, and are grounded in epidemiologic data (e.g., focused on entrants from states with higher incidence of Covid-19). Conscientious judges will carefully weigh the gravity of local pandemic conditions and consider whether less restrictive alternatives, such as mass testing at the border, might do as well in containing spread. Whether or not the travel restrictions ultimately pass legal muster, the impulse to adopt them is understandable. Early in the pandemic, states with few cases wanted to keep it that way. Today, people in areas that have endured crushing losses of liberty worry that unregulated borders will jeopardize their hard-won gains in controlling Covid-19. Yet state or regional isolationism is a poor substitute for national leadership in pandemic response. Even as it refused to suspend Maine’s travel restrictions, the Maine court quoted Supreme Court Justice Benjamin Cardozo’s admonition in Baldwin v. Seelig , an economic protectionism case, that “The Constitution was framed … upon the theory that the peoples of the several states must sink or swim together, and that in the long run prosperity and salvation are in union and not division.” Cardozo’s plea for unity could be read today as a call for the coordinated, coherent federal response to Covid-19 that has been so lacking. Such a response might have mitigated the disparities now driving interstate divisions and the desperation states feel to protect themselves when no one else will. Infectious diseases may not recognize political boundaries, but disease-control policies certainly do.
Markdown
[Skip to main content](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#mainContent) - [The New England Journal of MedicineNEJM](https://www.nejm.org/) - [NEJM Evidence](https://evidence.nejm.org/) - [NEJM AI](https://ai.nejm.org/) - [NEJM Catalyst](https://catalyst.nejm.org/) - [NEJM Journal Watch](https://www.jwatch.org/) [Sign In](https://www.nejm.org/sign-in?uri=/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274)\|[Create Account](https://www.nejm.org/action/storeProxy?action=register&promo=ONFLNRC1) [Subscribe](https://www.nejm.org/action/storeProxy?action=subscribe&promo=ONF4NRS1) [![The New England Journal of Medicine homepage](https://www.nejm.org/specs/products/mms-nextgen/mms/releasedAssets/images/other-images/nejm-logo-166667e91992a5212bc723b03e45d39f.svg)](https://www.nejm.org/ "The New England Journal of Medicine homepage") [Sign In](https://www.nejm.org/sign-in?uri=/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274)\|[Create Account](https://www.nejm.org/action/storeProxy?action=register&promo=ONFLNRC1) [Subscribe](https://www.nejm.org/action/storeProxy?action=subscribe&promo=ONF4NRS1) [![The New England Journal of Medicine homepage](https://www.nejm.org/specs/products/mms-nextgen/mms/releasedAssets/images/other-images/nejm-small-logo-070df7a3f4d8cfa2e71c3c45bb4b172f.svg)](https://www.nejm.org/ "The New England Journal of Medicine homepage") - [current issue](https://www.nejm.org/toc/nejm/current) - [VIEW CURRENT ISSUE](https://www.nejm.org/toc/nejm/current) - [BROWSE RECENTLY PUBLISHED](https://www.nejm.org/toc/nejm/recently-published) - [BROWSE ALL ISSUES](https://www.nejm.org/loi/nejm) - [SPECIALTIES](https://www.nejm.org/medical-specialties) - [Cardiology](https://www.nejm.org/browse/specialty/cardiology) - [Clinical Medicine](https://www.nejm.org/browse/specialty/clinical-medicine) - [Endocrinology](https://www.nejm.org/browse/specialty/endocrinology) - [Gastroenterology](https://www.nejm.org/browse/specialty/gastroenterology) - [Hematology/Oncology](https://www.nejm.org/browse/specialty/hematology-oncology) - [Infectious Disease](https://www.nejm.org/browse/specialty/infectious-disease) - [Nephrology](https://www.nejm.org/browse/specialty/nephrology) - [Neurology/Neurosurgery](https://www.nejm.org/browse/specialty/neurology-neurosurgery) - [Obstetrics/Gynecology](https://www.nejm.org/browse/specialty/obstetrics-gynecology) - [Pediatrics](https://www.nejm.org/browse/specialty/pediatrics) - [Pulmonary/Critical Care](https://www.nejm.org/browse/specialty/pulmonary-critical-care) - [Surgery](https://www.nejm.org/browse/specialty/surgery) - [View All Specialties](https://www.nejm.org/medical-specialties) - [TOPICS](https://www.nejm.org/topics) - [AI in Medicine](https://www.nejm.org/ai-in-medicine) - [Climate Change](https://www.nejm.org/browse/specialty/climate-change) - [Coronavirus](https://www.nejm.org/coronavirus) - [Corporatization of Health Care](https://www.nejm.org/corporatization-of-health-care) - [Efforts toward Equity](https://www.nejm.org/equity) - [Firearm Injury Prevention](https://www.nejm.org/firearm-injury-prevention) - [From the National Academy of Medicine](https://www.nejm.org/nam) - [Gray Matters](https://www.nejm.org/gray-matters) - [Health Policy](https://www.nejm.org/browse/specialty/health-policy) - [Medicine and Society](https://www.nejm.org/medicine-and-society) - [Nutrition in Medicine](https://www.nejm.org/nutrition-in-medicine) - [Outbreaks Center](https://www.nejm.org/outbreaks) - [Race and Medicine](https://www.nejm.org/race-and-medicine) - [Recognizing Historical Injustices and the Journal](https://www.nejm.org/recognizing-historical-injustices) - [Tobacco Use Reduction](https://www.nejm.org/tobacco-use-reduction) - [View All Topics](https://www.nejm.org/topics) - [MULTIMEDIA](https://www.nejm.org/multimedia) - [Podcasts](https://www.nejm.org/rss-feed) - [Double Takes](https://www.nejm.org/double-take) - [Illustrated Glossary](https://illustrated-glossary.nejm.org/) - [Image Challenge](https://www.nejm.org/image-challenge) - [Images in Clinical Medicine](https://www.nejm.org/browse/nejm-media-type/images-in-clinical-medicine) - [Interactive Medical Cases](https://www.nejm.org/browse/nejm-media-type/interactive-medical-case) - [Research Summaries](https://www.nejm.org/browse/nejm-media-type/research-summary) - [Quick Takes](https://www.nejm.org/multimedia/quick-take-video) - [Videos in Clinical Medicine](https://www.nejm.org/browse/nejm-media-type/videos-in-clinical-medicine) - [View All Multimedia](https://www.nejm.org/multimedia) - [LEARNING/CME](https://www.nejm.org/learning) - [Case Challenges](https://www.nejm.org/case-challenges) - [Medical Education](https://www.nejm.org/medical-education) - [Weekly CME](https://www.nejm.org/continuing-medical-education) - [VIEW ALL LEARNING/CME](https://www.nejm.org/learning) - [AUTHOR CENTER](https://www.nejm.org/author-center/home) [Sign In](https://www.nejm.org/sign-in?uri=/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274)\|[Create Account](https://www.nejm.org/action/storeProxy?action=register&promo=ONFLNRC1) [Subscribe](https://www.nejm.org/action/storeProxy?action=subscribe&promo=ONF4NRS1) Save ##### Create an E-mail Alert for This Article Reference 1 [Perspective](https://www.nejm.org/browse/nejm-article-type/perspective) Share on # Partitioning the Curve — Interstate Travel Restrictions During the Covid-19 Pandemic Authors: David M. Studdert, LL.B., Sc.D., Mark A. Hall, J.D., and Michelle M. Mello, J.D., Ph.D. <https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2877-4270>[Author Info & Affiliations](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#tab-contributors) Published August 5, 2020 N Engl J Med 2020;383: e83 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp2024274 [VOL. 383 NO. 13](https://www.nejm.org/toc/nejm/383/13) [Copyright © 2020](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#tab-information) ##### Permissions For permission requests, please contact NEJM Reprints at [reprints@nejm.org](mailto:reprints@nejm.org) Contents - [Notes](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#backnotes) - [Supplementary Material](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#supplementary-materials) - [References](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#bibliography) - [Information & Authors](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#core-collateral-info) - [Metrics & Citations](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#core-collateral-metrics) - [View Options](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#core-collateral-fulltext-options) - [References](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#core-collateral-references) - [Media](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#core-collateral-media) - [Tables](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#core-collateral-tables) - [Share](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#core-collateral-share) Since the onset of the Covid-19 crisis in the United States, government action taken to “flatten” the curve of disease transmission has varied dramatically among states, counties, and cities. The early epicenters — New York City, Washington State, and the San Francisco Bay Area — implemented aggressive measures in mid-March, many of which remain in place. Other states and localities opted for milder restrictions, acted much later, or barely intervened at all. Many states began unwinding restrictions weeks ago, although surging case numbers are prompting some to change course. The patchwork nature of the response helps explain the current situation: Covid-19’s spread now has many different trajectories, which partly track jurisdictional boundaries. In the third week of July, for example, Covid-19 incidence was 10 times as high in some states as in others. Many jurisdictions have responded to the unevenness of the unfolding pandemic by battening down their borders. Nearly half the states have imposed interstate travel restrictions to date (see [graph](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#f1)). Eight have imposed restrictions on entrants from all states, 12 have imposed them only on entrants from selected high-prevalence areas, and 4 have shifted between these positions. A common feature of these orders is a requirement that entrants — both residents and nonresidents — self-quarantine for 14 days, although news reports suggest that states are not actively monitoring compliance. Several states recently modified their orders to permit proof of negative tests for Covid-19 infection in lieu of self-quarantine. A stark illustration of the shifting geographic dynamics is that some states, such as Florida and Texas, that months ago targeted “fugitives” from Covid-19 hotspots in the Northeast now find the tables turned. ![](https://www.nejm.org/cms/10.1056/NEJMp2024274/asset/3a16bef2-ca06-48a0-8cc0-c7dcaa4dfb74/assets/images/large/nejmp2024274_f1.jpg) States with Orders Restricting Interstate Travel, March 17 through July 15, 2020. Start dates shown reflect the day on which the order came into effect. Information is from state government websites, news reports, and Ballotpedia (<https://ballotpedia.org>). Other federations have turned to controls on movement, too. Interprovincial travel restrictions have been a prominent feature of the Covid-19 response in Canada; they are beginning to give way to other arrangements, such as the “Atlantic bubble,” a regional pact that lowers travel barriers across Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland and Labrador. Four of Australia’s eight states and territories are currently restricting all domestic entrants, three restrict entrants from certain states, and one maintains an open border. In Germany, the federal and state governments have agreed to frame travel bans around small, local areas of outbreaks within states. In the United States, attempts to restrict interstate travel present distinctive legal issues. The U.S. Supreme Court has long recognized an implicit constitutional right to travel, consisting of three elements: the right to enter and leave a state, the right “to be treated as a welcome visitor rather than an unfriendly alien” when visiting a state, and the right to become a citizen of any state.[1](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#core-collateral-r1) The first element is among the liberty interests protected by the due process clauses of the 5th and 14th Amendments to the Constitution; the second and third elements are grounded in the privileges and immunities clause of Article IV. When laws infringing the right to travel across state lines are challenged in court, they are usually subjected to heightened scrutiny: courts uphold them only if they serve an important government interest (variously described as “substantial” or “compelling”) and are “narrowly tailored” — meaning that the government’s purpose cannot feasibly be achieved through less restrictive means. The Supreme Court has never explained the nature and extent of the right to travel during a natural disaster or public health crisis. Precedent upholding state and local governments’ authority to quarantine incoming ships (domestic and foreign) for health reasons is relevant but predates modern right-to-travel cases.[2](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#core-collateral-r2) Courts could choose to apply no greater judicial scrutiny than they do to many other legal measures adopted to fight contagious diseases; following the seminal holding in *Jacobson v. Massachusetts*, courts typically ask only whether such measures are reasonable and necessary. But it seems more likely that courts will choose the heightened scrutiny they have applied to public health orders affecting specially protected rights, such as church attendance and abortion access. Indeed, two federal trial courts have recently done just that in Covid-19 right-to-travel cases, with different results. One court suspended Kentucky’s orders that residents and nonresidents entering the state must self-quarantine for 14 days, finding them overbroad.[3](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#core-collateral-r3) In a poorly reasoned opinion, the court simply assumed that a less restrictive alternative existed, without indicating what it was. Nor did the court address the state’s arguments that the orders were time limited, included some exceptions, didn’t affect intrastate travel, and could be no narrower because Covid-19 conditions were constantly changing in other states. In Maine, an alliance of campground and restaurant owners and prospective visitors challenged the state’s mandatory self-quarantine for incoming travelers, which applied to both residents and nonresidents. The court turned away the plaintiffs’ request for a preliminary injunction, noting that the less restrictive alternatives they offered were “unworkable.”[4](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#core-collateral-r4) However, the court expressed openness to hearing additional evidence about alternatives as the suit progressed. In a third lawsuit, three U.S. mainland residents who own property in Hawaii and one Hawaii resident have challenged that state’s mandatory self-quarantine of all entrants. The U.S. Department of Justice has intervened with a “statement of interest” supporting the plaintiffs, as it did in the Maine case. The nub of the federal government’s argument is that these states’ rules could have been crafted less restrictively; they could have been applied only to visitors from Covid-19 hotspots or exempted visitors who tested negative for or had recovered from Covid-19. On July 2, a federal district court judge rejected this argument.[5](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#core-collateral-r5) Applying the more lenient standard of review from *Jacobson*, the court found ample evidence that the restrictions were justified by the emergency at hand and concluded that it would reach the same result applying heightened scrutiny. The same judge invoked similar reasoning on July 22 to reject another attempt at suspending Hawaii’s travel restrictions; she noted that the spike in Covid-19 cases and deaths since early July had made the case for requiring entrants to self-quarantine even stronger. Notably, the orders challenged to date have applied to residents as well as nonresidents entering the state. Even so, the court that initially upheld Maine’s order was persuaded that it discriminated against out-of-state residents in practice because visitors who don’t own a home in Maine would have greater difficulty self-quarantining. This finding matters because when states treat out-of-state travelers differently, they confront greater constitutional uncertainty than when their regulations affect residents and nonresidents even-handedly. Courts are mindful that, historically, differential travel restrictions have served as a pretext for turning away minorities or impoverished people and for economic protectionism. Courts also tend to be more skeptical when exceptions are granted to some interests and activities but not to other, similar ones. In sum, states seeking to impose interstate travel restrictions must navigate a very uncertain legal path, aiming for rules that are neither over- nor under-inclusive. Nevertheless, basic legal principles suggest that travel restrictions stand the best chance of withstanding constitutional scrutiny if they apply equally to residents and nonresidents, allow well-justified exceptions (e.g., for people with recent negative SARS-CoV-2 tests), are time limited and regularly reviewed, and are grounded in epidemiologic data (e.g., focused on entrants from states with higher incidence of Covid-19). Conscientious judges will carefully weigh the gravity of local pandemic conditions and consider whether less restrictive alternatives, such as mass testing at the border, might do as well in containing spread. Whether or not the travel restrictions ultimately pass legal muster, the impulse to adopt them is understandable. Early in the pandemic, states with few cases wanted to keep it that way. Today, people in areas that have endured crushing losses of liberty worry that unregulated borders will jeopardize their hard-won gains in controlling Covid-19. Yet state or regional isolationism is a poor substitute for national leadership in pandemic response. Even as it refused to suspend Maine’s travel restrictions, the Maine court quoted Supreme Court Justice Benjamin Cardozo’s admonition in *Baldwin v. Seelig*, an economic protectionism case, that “The Constitution was framed … upon the theory that the peoples of the several states must sink or swim together, and that in the long run prosperity and salvation are in union and not division.” Cardozo’s plea for unity could be read today as a call for the coordinated, coherent federal response to Covid-19 that has been so lacking. Such a response might have mitigated the disparities now driving interstate divisions and the desperation states feel to protect themselves when no one else will. Infectious diseases may not recognize political boundaries, but disease-control policies certainly do. ## Notes This article was published on August 5, 2020, at NEJM.org. [Disclosure forms](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#ap1) provided by the authors are available at NEJM.org. ## Supplementary Material Disclosure Forms (nejmp2024274\_disclosures.pdf) - [Download](https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMp2024274/suppl_file/nejmp2024274_disclosures.pdf) - 138\.54 KB ## References 1\. Saenz v. Roe, 526 U.S. 489 (1999). [Go to Citation](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#core-r1-1) [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Saenz+v.+Roe%2C+526+U.S.+489+%281999%29.) 2\. Compagnie Francaise de Navigation a Vapeur v. Board of Health of State of Louisiana, 186 U.S. 380 (1902). [Go to Citation](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#core-r2-1) [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Compagnie+Francaise+de+Navigation+a+Vapeur+v.+Board+of+Health+of+State+of+Louisiana%2C+186+U.S.+380+%281902%29.) 3\. Roberts v. Neace, No. 2:20CV054 (WOB-CJS), 2020 WL 2115358 (E.D. Ky. May 4, 2020). [Go to Citation](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#core-r3-1) [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Roberts+v.+Neace%2C+No.+2%3A20CV054+%28WOB-CJS%29%2C+2020+WL+2115358+%28E.D.+Ky.+May+4%2C+2020%29.) 4\. Bayley’s Campground Inc. v. Mills, No. 2:20-CV-00176-LEW, 2020 WL 2791797 (D. Me. May 29, 2020). [Go to Citation](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#core-r4-1) [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Bayley%E2%80%99s+Campground+Inc.+v.+Mills%2C+No.+2%3A20-CV-00176-LEW%2C+2020+WL+2791797+%28D.+Me.+May+29%2C+2020%29.) 5\. Carmichael v. Ige, No. 20-00273 JAO-WRP, 2020 WL 3630738 (D. Hawaii Jul. 2, 2020). [Go to Citation](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#core-r5-1) [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Carmichael+v.+Ige%2C+No.+20-00273+JAO-WRP%2C+2020+WL+3630738+%28D.+Hawaii+Jul.+2%2C+2020%29.) ## Information & Authors Information Authors ### Information #### Published In New England Journal of Medicine [Volume 383 • Number 13 • September 24, 2020](https://www.nejm.org/toc/nejm/383/13) eLocator: e83 #### Copyright Copyright © 2020 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. For personal use only. Any commercial reuse of NEJM Group content requires [permission](mailto:permissions@nejm.org). #### History **Published online**: August 5, 2020 **Published in issue**: September 24, 2020 #### Topics 1. [Health Law](https://www.nejm.org/browse/topic/health-law) 2. [Medical Ethics General](https://www.nejm.org/browse/topic/medical-ethics-general) 3. [Public Health](https://www.nejm.org/browse/topic/public-health) 4. [Viral Infections](https://www.nejm.org/browse/topic/viral-infections) ### Authors #### Authors David M. Studdert, LL.B., Sc.D., Mark A. Hall, J.D., and Michelle M. Mello, J.D., Ph.D. <https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2877-4270> #### Affiliations From Stanford Law School and Stanford Health Policy and the Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA (D.M.S., M.M.M.); and Wake Forest University Schools of Law and Medicine, Wake Forest, NC (M.A.H.). ## Metrics & Citations Metrics Citations20 ### Metrics #### Altmetrics ### Citations #### Export citation Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication. #### Cited by 1. - Alberto A. Gaggero, - Alexander Luttmann, How does COVID-19 affect intertemporal price discrimination and price dispersion? Evidence from the airline industry, International Journal of Industrial Organization, **101**, (103171), (2025).<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2025.103171> [Crossref](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2025.103171) 2. - Pingping Wang, - Yihong Yuan, Analyzing Key Factors Influencing Human Mobility Before and During COVID ‐19 With Explainable Machine Learning , Transactions in GIS, **29**, 1, (2024).<https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.13271> [Crossref](https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.13271) 3. - Maria M. Martignoni, - Julien Arino, - Amy Hurford, Is SARS-CoV-2 elimination or mitigation best? Regional and disease characteristics determine the recommended strategy, Royal Society Open Science, **11**, 6, (2024).<https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.240186> [Crossref](https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.240186) 4. - Torran Semple, - Achille Fonzone, - Grigorios Fountas, - Lucy Downey, An empirical analysis of the factors influencing Scottish residents’ compliance with COVID-19 travel restrictions, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, **178**, (103842), (2023).<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103842> [Crossref](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103842) 5. - Xiaoqian Sun, - Sebastian Wandelt, - Anming Zhang, Why are COVID-19 travel bubbles a tightrope walk? An investigation based on the Trans-Tasmanian case, Communications in Transportation Research, **3**, (100089), (2023).<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commtr.2022.100089> [Crossref](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commtr.2022.100089) 6. - Dimin Wang, - Ying Chen, - Jovanie Tuguinay, - Jessica J. Yuan, The Influence of Perceived Risks and Behavioral Intention: The Case of Chinese International Students, Sage Open, **13**, 2, (2023).<https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231183435> [Crossref](https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231183435) 7. - Amina Ly, - Frances V. Davenport, - Noah S. Diffenbaugh, Exploring the Influence of Summer Temperature on Human Mobility During the COVID‐19 Pandemic in the San Francisco Bay Area, GeoHealth, **7**, 6, (2023).<https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GH000772> [Crossref](https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GH000772) 8. - Raviraj Dave, - Tushar Choudhari, - Avijit Maji, - Udit Bhatia, Quantitative Framework for Establishing Low-Risk Inter-District Travel Corridors During COVID-19, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, **2677**, 4, (335-349), (2022).<https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211064994> [Crossref](https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211064994) 9. - Lue Ping Zhao, - Terry P. Lybrand, - Peter B. Gilbert, - Thomas R. Hawn, - Joshua T. Schiffer, - Leonidas Stamatatos, - Thomas H. Payne, - Lindsay N. Carpp, - Daniel E. Geraghty, - Keith R. Jerome, Tracking SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Mutations in the United States (January 2020—March 2021) Using a Statistical Learning Strategy, Viruses, **14**, 1, (9), (2021).<https://doi.org/10.3390/v14010009> [Crossref](https://doi.org/10.3390/v14010009) 10. - Taegyoon Kim, - Nitheesha Nakka, - Ishita Gopal, - Bruce A. Desmarais, - Abigail Mancinelli, - Jeffrey J. Harden, - Hyein Ko, - Frederick J. Boehmke, Attention to the COVID‐19 Pandemic on Twitter: Partisan Differences Among U.S. State Legislators, Legislative Studies Quarterly, **47**, 4, (1023-1041), (2021).<https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12367> [Crossref](https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12367) 11. [See more]() Loading... ## View Options ### View options #### PDF [View PDF](https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMp2024274) ## Media Figures Other ### Figures Open all in viewer ![](https://www.nejm.org/cms/10.1056/NEJMp2024274/asset/3a16bef2-ca06-48a0-8cc0-c7dcaa4dfb74/assets/images/large/nejmp2024274_f1.jpg) States with Orders Restricting Interstate Travel, March 17 through July 15, 2020. Start dates shown reflect the day on which the order came into effect. Information is from state government websites, news reports, and Ballotpedia (<https://ballotpedia.org>). [Go to Figure](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#f1) Open in Viewer ### Other ## Tables ## Share ### Share #### CONTENT LINK https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274 Copy Link Copied\! Copying failed. #### Share [Facebook](https://www.nejm.org/#facebook "Share on Facebook")[X](https://www.nejm.org/#twitter "Share on X")[LinkedIn](https://www.nejm.org/#linkedin "Share on LinkedIn")[email](https://www.nejm.org/#email "Share on email")[Bluesky](https://www.nejm.org/#bluesky "Share on Bluesky") ## References ### References 1\. Saenz v. Roe, 526 U.S. 489 (1999). [Go to Citation](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#core-r1-1) [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Saenz+v.+Roe%2C+526+U.S.+489+%281999%29.) 2\. Compagnie Francaise de Navigation a Vapeur v. Board of Health of State of Louisiana, 186 U.S. 380 (1902). [Go to Citation](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#core-r2-1) [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Compagnie+Francaise+de+Navigation+a+Vapeur+v.+Board+of+Health+of+State+of+Louisiana%2C+186+U.S.+380+%281902%29.) 3\. Roberts v. Neace, No. 2:20CV054 (WOB-CJS), 2020 WL 2115358 (E.D. Ky. May 4, 2020). [Go to Citation](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#core-r3-1) [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Roberts+v.+Neace%2C+No.+2%3A20CV054+%28WOB-CJS%29%2C+2020+WL+2115358+%28E.D.+Ky.+May+4%2C+2020%29.) 4\. Bayley’s Campground Inc. v. Mills, No. 2:20-CV-00176-LEW, 2020 WL 2791797 (D. Me. May 29, 2020). [Go to Citation](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#core-r4-1) [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Bayley%E2%80%99s+Campground+Inc.+v.+Mills%2C+No.+2%3A20-CV-00176-LEW%2C+2020+WL+2791797+%28D.+Me.+May+29%2C+2020%29.) 5\. Carmichael v. Ige, No. 20-00273 JAO-WRP, 2020 WL 3630738 (D. Hawaii Jul. 2, 2020). [Go to Citation](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#core-r5-1) [Google Scholar](https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Carmichael+v.+Ige%2C+No.+20-00273+JAO-WRP%2C+2020+WL+3630738+%28D.+Hawaii+Jul.+2%2C+2020%29.) [![](https://www.nejm.org/sda/128886/NOS-300x250-2x-1.jpg)](https://www.nejm.org/action/clickThrough?id=128886&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nejm.org%2Fgray-matters%3Fquery%3Dcm-rr-article%26utm_source%3Dnejm%26utm_medium%3Dcm%26utm_campaign%3Dnoss3&loc=%2Fdoi%2Ffull%2F10.1056%2FNEJMp2024274&pubId=41289176&placeholderId=101337&productId=1007) [Download PDF](https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMp2024274?download=true) Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level [Go to figure location within the article](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#f1 "Go to figure location within the article") [Download figure](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274 "Download figure") Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel All figuresAll tables View all material View all material [xrefBack.goTo]() xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS [Authors Info & Affiliations](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#tab-contributors) Now Reading: Partitioning the Curve — Interstate Travel Restrictions During the Covid-19 Pandemic [Share](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274) [PREVIOUS ARTICLE Are U.S. Hospitals Still “Recession-proof”?Previous](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2018846) [NEXT ARTICLE KRASG12C Inhibition with Sotorasib in Advanced Solid TumorsNext](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1917239) ### [More from Vol. 383 No. 13](https://www.nejm.org/toc/nejm/383/13) - - [Original Article](https://www.nejm.org/browse/nejm-article-type/original-article) - Sep 24, 2020 - FREE ### [KRASG12C Inhibition with Sotorasib in Advanced Solid Tumors](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1917239) D.S. Hong and Others - - [Original Article](https://www.nejm.org/browse/nejm-article-type/original-article) - Sep 24, 2020 - FREE ### [Avelumab Maintenance Therapy for Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2002788) T. Powles and Others - - [Original Article](https://www.nejm.org/browse/nejm-article-type/original-article) - Sep 24, 2020 - FREE ### [Lower-Dose Zinc for Childhood Diarrhea — A Randomized, Multicenter Trial](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1915905) U. Dhingra and Others Tap into groundbreaking research and clinically relevant insights - [Subscribe](https://www.nejm.org/action/clickThrough?id=127716&url=%2Faction%2FstoreProxy%3Faction%3Dsubscribe%26url%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.nejm.org%252Fdoi%252Ffull%252F10.1056%252FNEJMp2024274%26promo%3DONFQNRF1&loc=%2Fdoi%2Ffull%2F10.1056%2FNEJMp2024274&pubId=41289176&placeholderId=101336&productId=1035) Already a subscriber? [Activate](https://www.nejm.org/action/clickThrough?id=127716&url=%2Faction%2FstoreProxy%3Faction%3Dactivate%26url%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwww.nejm.org%252Fdoi%252Ffull%252F10.1056%252FNEJMp2024274%26promo%3DONFQANR4&loc=%2Fdoi%2Ffull%2F10.1056%2FNEJMp2024274&pubId=41289176&placeholderId=101336&productId=1035) your online access. ![Devices](https://www.nejm.org/sda/127716/footer-devices-2x.png) ## ARTICLE CATEGORIES - [Research](https://www.nejm.org/browse/nejm-article-category/research) - [Reviews](https://www.nejm.org/browse/nejm-article-category/review) - [Clinical Cases](https://www.nejm.org/browse/nejm-article-category/clinical-cases) - [Perspective](https://www.nejm.org/browse/nejm-article-category/perspective) - [Commentary](https://www.nejm.org/browse/nejm-article-category/commentary) - [Other](https://www.nejm.org/browse/nejm-article-category/other) - [Browse all Articles](https://www.nejm.org/medical-article-index) - [Current Issue](https://www.nejm.org/toc/nejm/current) - [Issue Index](https://www.nejm.org/loi/nejm) ## RESOURCES - [Authors & Reviewers](https://www.nejm.org/author-center/home) - [Submit a Manuscript](https://www.nejm.org/author-center/home) - [Subscribers](https://www.nejm.org/about-nejm/products-and-services) - [Institutional Administrators](https://tools.ovid.com/ovidtools/nejm.html) - [Media](https://www.nejm.org/media) - [Advertisers](https://www.nejm.org/about-nejm/how-to-advertise) - [Agents](https://www.nejm.org/information-for-subscription-agents) - [Permissions & Licensing](https://www.nejm.org/about-nejm/permissions) - [Reprints](https://www.nejm.org/about-nejm/reprints) - [NEJM CareerCenter](https://www.nejmcareercenter.org/) ## ABOUT US - [About NEJM](https://www.nejm.org/about-nejm/about-nejm) - [NEJM Group](https://www.nejmgroup.org/) - [Products & Services](https://www.nejm.org/about-nejm/products-and-services) - [Editors & Publishers](https://www.nejm.org/about-nejm/editors-and-publishers) - [Advertising Policies](https://www.nejm.org/about-nejm/advertising-policies) - [Contact Us](https://www.nejm.org/contact-nejm) - [Accessibility](https://www.nejm.org/about-nejm/frequently-asked-questions#Accessibility) - [FAQs](https://www.nejm.org/about-nejm/frequently-asked-questions) - [Help](https://www.nejm.org/about-nejm/help) - [Site Feedback](mailto:sitefeedback@nejm.org) ## SUBSCRIPTIONS - [Subscribe](https://www.nejm.org/action/storeProxy?action=subscribe&promo=ONF4NRS3) - [Renew](https://www.nejm.org/action/storeProxy?action=renew&product=nejm&promo=ONFLNRR3&prc=ONFARN52) - [Activate Subscription](https://www.nejm.org/action/storeProxy?action=activate&promo=ONFLNAA1) - [Create Account](https://www.nejm.org/action/storeProxy?action=register&promo=ONFLNRC4) - [Manage Account](https://myaccount.nejm.org/) - [Pay Bill](https://www.nejm.org/action/storeProxy?action=paybill&product=nejm&promo=BNFLPBA1) - [Institutional Sales](https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/solutions/ovid/nejm-complete-collection) - [Special Content](https://myaccount.nejm.org/special-content) ## STAY CONNECTED - [Email Alerts](https://myaccount.nejm.org/emails?section=NEJM) - [Create Account](https://www.nejm.org/action/storeProxy?action=register&promo=ONFLNRC3) - [Apps](https://www.nejm.org/about-nejm/products-and-services) - [NEJM CareerCenter](https://www.nejmcareercenter.org/) - [Podcasts](https://www.nejm.org/rss-feed/) - [RSS Feed](https://www.nejm.org/rss-feed/) - [Remote Access](https://www.nejm.org/about-nejm/institutional-access) ## FOLLOW US - [Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/TheNewEnglandJournalofMedicine) - [X](https://twitter.com/nejm) - [Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/nejm/) - [Youtube](https://www.youtube.com/user/NEJMvideo) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/company/nejm-group) - [Bluesky](https://bsky.app/profile/nejm.org) - [TikTok](https://www.tiktok.com/@nejm.org) ## JOURNALS - [The New England Journal of Medicine](https://www.nejm.org/) - [NEJM Catalyst Innovations in Care Delivery](https://catalyst.nejm.org/) - [NEJM Evidence](https://www.nejm.org/) - [NEJM AI](https://ai.nejm.org/) Copyright © 2025 [**Massachusetts Medical Society**](https://www.massmed.org/) . All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. Electronic ISSN 1533-4406. Print ISSN 0028-4793. The content of this site is intended for health care professionals. - [Copyright](https://www.nejmgroup.org/legal/copyright-information.htm) - [Terms](https://www.nejmgroup.org/legal/terms-of-use.htm) - [Privacy Policy](https://www.nejmgroup.org/legal/privacy-policy.htm) - [Cookie Preferences]() [![NEJM Group logo](https://www.nejm.org/specs/products/mms-nextgen/mms/releasedAssets/images/other-images/logo_group.svg)](https://www.nejmgroup.org/ "NEJM Group") Back to top This site uses cookies and related technologies, as described in our privacy policy, for purposes that may include site operation, analytics, enhanced user experience, or advertising. You may choose to consent to our use of these technologies, or manage your own preferences. Accept Manage Settings ✓ Thanks for sharing\! [AddToAny](https://www.addtoany.com/ "Share Buttons") [More…](https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274#addtoany "Show all") # Sign In {\* \#signInForm \*} {\* signInEmailAddress \*} {\* currentPassword \*} Remember Me [Forgot your password?]() Sign In Don't have an account? [Create Account]() [Subscribe](https://store.nejm.org/nejm?promo=ONF4NRS1) [Create Account]() [Subscribe](https://store.nejm.org/nejm?promo=ONF4NRS1) {\* /signInForm \*} # Sign In {\* \#signInForm \*} {\* signInEmailAddress \*} {\* currentPassword \*} Remember Me [Forgot your password?]() Sign In Don't have an account? [Create Account]() [Subscribe](https://store.nejm.org/nejm?promo=ONF4NRS1) {\* /signInForm \*} # Forgot Password Enter the email address associated with your account then click Continue. We will email you a link to a page where you can easily create a new password. {\* \#forgotPasswordForm \*} {\* forgotPasswordEmailAddress \*} {\* captcha \*} {\* /forgotPasswordForm \*} # Create New Password We've sent an email with instructions to create a new password. Your existing password has not been changed. CLOSE To reset your password, enter a new password twice and click the 'Reset Password' button. {\* \#changePasswordFormNoAuth \*} {\* newPassword \*} {\* newPasswordConfirm \*} {\* /changePasswordFormNoAuth \*} Your password has been reset. You will need to [sign in](https://www.nejm.org/signin) again using your new password to access site content and features. {\* \#resetPasswordForm \*} The link that you followed to reset your password has expired. Enter the email address associated with your account then click Continue. We will email you a link to a page where you can easily create a new password. {\* signInEmailAddress \*} {\* /resetPasswordForm \*} If the address matches an existing account, you will receive an email with instructions to reset your password.
Readable Markdownnull
Shard16 (laksa)
Root Hash601868283195446616
Unparsed URLorg,nejm!www,/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2024274 s443