ℹ️ Skipped - page is already crawled
| Filter | Status | Condition | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| HTTP status | PASS | download_http_code = 200 | HTTP 200 |
| Age cutoff | PASS | download_stamp > now() - 6 MONTH | 0.4 months ago |
| History drop | PASS | isNull(history_drop_reason) | No drop reason |
| Spam/ban | PASS | fh_dont_index != 1 AND ml_spam_score = 0 | ml_spam_score=0 |
| Canonical | PASS | meta_canonical IS NULL OR = '' OR = src_unparsed | Not set |
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| URL | https://www.mybluelinux.com/the-definitive-guide-to-python-import-statements/ |
| Last Crawled | 2026-03-29 16:50:17 (11 days ago) |
| First Indexed | 2020-11-12 18:05:20 (5 years ago) |
| HTTP Status Code | 200 |
| Meta Title | The Definitive Guide to Python import Statements - MyBlueLinux.com |
| Meta Description | Python code in one module gains access to the code in another module by the process of importing it. The import statement is the most common way of invoking the import machinery, but it is not the only way. |
| Meta Canonical | null |
| Boilerpipe Text | Summary / Key Points
Basic Definitions
Packages
Python has only one type of module object, and all modules are of this type, regardless of whether the module is implemented in Python, C, or something else. To help organize modules and provide a naming hierarchy, Python has a concept of
packages
.
You can think of packages as the directories on a file system and modules as files within directories
, but don’t take this analogy too literally since packages and modules need not originate from the file system. For the purposes of this documentation, we’ll use this convenient analogy of directories and files. Like file system directories, packages are organized hierarchically, and packages may themselves contain subpackages, as well as regular modules.
It’s important to keep in mind that all packages are modules, but not all modules are packages. Or put another way, packages are just a special kind of module. Specifically, any module that contains a
__path__
attribute is considered a package.
All modules have a name. Subpackage names are separated from their parent package name by a dot, akin to Python’s standard attribute access syntax. Thus you might have a module called
sys
and a package called
email
, which in turn has a subpackage called
email.mime
and a module within that subpackage called
email.mime.text
.
What is an python import
When a module is imported, Python runs all of the code in the module file. When a package is imported, Python runs all of the code in the package’s
__init__.py
file, if such a file exists. All of the objects defined in the module or the package’s
__init__.py
file are made available to the importer.
Basics of the Python import and sys.path
According to Python documentation, here is how an import statement searches for the correct module or package to import:
Technically, Python’s documentation is incomplete. The interpreter will not only look for a file (i.e., module) named
spam.py
, it will also look for a folder (i.e., package) named
spam
.
Note that the Python interpreter first searches through the list of
built-in modules
, modules that are compiled directly into the Python interpreter. This list of built-in modules is installation-dependent and can be found in
sys.builtin_module_names
(Python
2
and
3
).
The function
pkgutil.iter_modules
(Python
2
and
3
) can be used to get a list of all importable modules from a given path:
import
pkgutil
search_path
=
[
'.'
]
# set to None to see all modules importable from sys.path
all_modules
=
[
x
[
1
]
for
x
in
pkgutil
.
iter_modules
(
path
=
search_path
)]
print
(
all_modules
)
Sources:
How to get a list of built-in modules in python?
What is difference between built-in modules and other modules in Python’s standard library (Issue 2)
More on sys.path
To see what is in
sys.path
, run the following in the interpreter or as a script:
import
sys
print
(
sys
.
path
)
# Output on my computer:
[
''
,
'/usr/lib/python37.zip'
,
'/usr/lib/python3.7'
,
'/usr/lib/python3.7/lib-dynload'
,
'/usr/local/lib/python3.7/dist-packages'
,
'/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages'
]
The documentation for Python’s command line interface adds the following about running scripts from the command line. Specifically, when running python
<script>.py
, then…
Example Directory Structure
test/ # root folder
├── packA/ # package packA
│  ├── __init__.py
│  ├── a1.py
│  ├── a2.py
│  └── subA/ # subpackage subA
│  ├── __init__.py
│  ├── sa1.py
│  └── sa2.py
├── packB/ # package packB (implicit namespace package)
│  ├── b1.py
│  └── b2.py
├── math.py
├── random.py
├── other.py
└── start.py
Note that we do not place a
__init__.py
file in our root
test/
folder.
Recap the order for modules to import:
built-in modules from the Python Standard Library (e.g. sys, math)
modules or packages in a directory specified by
sys.path
:
If the Python interpreter is run interactively,
sys.path[0]
is the empty string
''
. This tells Python to search the current working directory from which you launched the interpreter, i.e., the output of
pwd
on Unix systems.
e.g. If we run a script with python
<script>.py
,
sys.path[0]
is the path to
<script>.py
.
directories in the
PYTHONPATH
environment variable
default
sys.path
locations, including remaining Python Standard Library modules which are not built-in
All about
__init__.py
An
__init__.py
file has 2 functions.
convert a folder of scripts into an importable package of modules
(before Python 3.3)
run package initialization code
Converting a folder of scripts into an importable package of modules
In order to import a module or package from a directory that is not in the same directory as the script we are writing (or the directory from which we run the Python interactive interpreter), that module needs to be in a package.
As defined above, any directory with a file named
__init__.py
is a Python package. This file can be empty. For example, when running Python 2.7,
start.py
can import the package
packA
but not
packB
because there is no
__init__.py
file in the
test/packB/
directory.
For example,
packB
in our example is a
namespace package
because it doesn’t have a
__init__.py
file in the folder. If we start a Python 3.6 interactive interpreter in the
test/
directory, then we get the following output:
>>>
import
packB
>>>
packB
<
module
'packB'
(
namespace
)
>
Sources:
What’s __init__.py for?
stackoverflow.com
PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages
Running package initialization code
The first time that a package or one of its modules is imported, Python will execute the
__init__.py
file in the root folder of the package if the file exists. All objects and functions defined in
__init__.py
are considered part of the package namespace.
Consider the following example.
test/packA/a1.py
def
a1_func
():
print
(
"running a1_func()"
)
test/packA/__init__.py
## this import makes a1_func directly accessible from packA.a1_func
from
packA.a1
import
a1_func
def
packA_func
():
print
(
"running packA_func()"
)
test/start.py
import
packA
# "import packA.a1" will work just the same
packA
.
packA_func
()
packA
.
a1_func
()
packA
.
a1
.
a1_func
()
output of running
python start.py
:
~
]
python start.py
running packA_func
()
running a1_func
()
running a1_func
()
Using Objects from the Imported Module or Package
Example:
start.py
needs to import the
helloWorld()
function in
sa1.py
Solution 1:
from packA.subA.sa1 import helloWorld
we can call the function directly by name:
x = helloWorld()
Solution 2:
from packA.subA import sa1
or equivalently
import packA.subA.sa1 as sa1
we have to prefix the function name with the name of the module:
x = sa1.helloWorld()
This is sometimes preferred over Solution 1 in order to make it explicit that we are calling the
helloWorld
function from the
sa1
module.
Solution 3:
import packA.subA.sa1
we need to use the full path:
x = packA.subA.sa1.helloWorld()
Use dir() to examine the contents of an imported module
After importing a module, use the
dir()
function to get a list of accessible names from the module. For example, suppose I import
sa1
. If
sa1.py
defines a
helloWorld()
function, then
dir(sa1)
would include
helloWorld
.
>>>
from
packA.subA
import
sa1
>>>
dir
(
sa1
)
[
'__builtins__'
,
'__cached__'
,
'__doc__'
,
'__file__'
,
'__loader__'
,
'__name__'
,
'__package__'
,
'__spec__'
,
'helloWorld'
]
Importing Packages
Importing a package is conceptually equivalent to importing the package’s
__init__.py
file as a module. Indeed, this is what Python treats the package as:
>>>
import
packA
>>>
packA
<
module
'packA'
from
'packA\__init__.py'
>
Only objects declared in the imported package’s
__init__.py
are accessible to the importer. For example, since
packB
lacks a
__init__.py
file, calling
import packB
(in Python 3.3+) has very little use because no objects in the
packB
package are made available. A subsequent call to
packB.b1
would fail because it has not been imported yet.
Absolute vs. Relative Import
The Python documentation says the following about Python 3’s handling of relative imports:
The only acceptable syntax for relative imports is
from .[module] import name
. All import forms not starting with . are interpreted as absolute imports.
Source:
What’s New in Python 3.0
For example, suppose we are running
start.py
which imports
a1
which in turn imports
other
,
a2
, and
sa1
. Then the import statements in
a1.py
would look as follows:
absolute imports:
import
other
import
packA.a2
import
packA.subA.sa1
explicit relative imports:
import
other
from
.
import
a2
from
.subA
import
sa1
implicit relative imports (NOT SUPPORTED IN PYTHON 3):
import
other
import
a2
import
subA.sa1
Sources:
How to accomplish relative import in python
Changes in import statement python3
Case Examples
Case 1: sys.path is known ahead of time
If you only ever call
python start.py
or
python other.py
, then it is very easy to set up the imports for all of the modules. In this case,
sys.path
will always include
test/
in its search path. Therefore, all of the import statements can be written relative to the
test/
folder.
Ex: a file in the
test
project needs to import the
helloWorld()
function in
sa1.py
Solution:
from packA.subA.sa1 import helloWorld
(or any of the other equivalent import syntaxes demonstrated above)
Case 2: sys.path could change
Often, we want to be flexible in how we use a Python script, whether run directly on the command line or imported as a module into another script. As shown below, this is where we run into problems, especially on Python 3.
Example
: Suppose
start.py
needs to import
a2
which needs to import
sa2
. Assume that
start.py
is always run directly, never imported. We also want to be able to run
a2
on its own.
Seems easy enough, right? After all, we just need 2 import statements total: 1 in
start.py
and another in
a2.py
.
Problem
: This is clearly a case where
sys.path
changes. When we run
start.py
,
sys.path
contains
test/
. When we run
a2.py
,
sys.path
contains
test/packA/
.
The import statement in
start.py
is easy. Since
start.py
it is always run directly and never imported, we know that
test/
will always be in
sys.path
when it is run. Then importing
a2
is simply
import packA.a2
.
The import statement in
a2.py
is trickier. When we run
start.py
directly,
sys.path
contains
test/
, so
a2.py
should call
from packA.subA import sa2
. However, if we instead run
a2.py
directly, then
sys.path
contains
test/packA/
. Now the import would fail because
packA
is not a folder inside
test/packA/
.
Instead, we could try
from subA import sa2
. This corrects the problem when we run
a2.py
directly. But now we have a problem when we run
start.py
directly. Under Python 3, this fails because
subA
is not in
sys.path
. (This is OK in Python 2, thanks to its support for implicit relative imports.)
Let’s summarize our findings about the import statement in
a2.py
:
Run
from packA.subA import sa2
from subA import sa2
start.py
OK
Py2 OK, Py3 fail (subA not in test/)
a2.py
fail (packA not in test/packA/)
OK
For completeness sake, I also tried using relative imports:
from .subA import sa2
. This matches the result of
from packA.subA import sa2
.
Solutions (Workarounds)
: I am unaware of a clean solution to this problem. Here are some workarounds:
Use absolute imports rooted at the
test/
directory (i.e., middle column in the table above). This guarantees that running
start.py
directly will always work. In order to run
a2.py
directly, run it as an imported module instead of as a script:
change directories to
test/
in the console
python -m packA.a2
Use absolute imports rooted at the
test/
directory (i.e., middle column in the table above). This guarantees that running
start.py
directly will always work. In order to run
a2.py
directly, we can modify
sys.path
in
a2.py
to include
test/
, before
sa2
is imported.
import
os
,
sys
sys
.
path
.
append
(
os
.
path
.
dirname
(
os
.
path
.
dirname
(
os
.
path
.
realpath
(
__file__
))))
# now this works, even when a2.py is run directly
from
packA.subA
import
sa2
NOTE: This method usually works. However, under some Python installations, the
__file__
variable might not be correct. In this case, we would need to use the Python built-in
inspect
package. See
this StackOverflow answer
for instructions.
Only use Python 2, and use implicit relative imports (i.e., the right column in the table above).
Use absolute imports rooted at the
test/
directory, and add
test/
to the
PYTHONPATH
environment variable.
This solution is not portable, so I recommend against it.
instructions here:
Permanently add a directory to PYTHONPATH
Case 3: Importing from Parent Directory
If we do not modify
PYTHONPATH
and avoid modifying
sys.path
programmatically, then the following is a major limitation of Python imports:
For example, if I were to run
python sa1.py
, then it is impossible for
sa1.py
to import anything from
a1.py
without resorting to a
PYTHONPATH
or
sys.path
workaround.
At first, it may seem that relative imports (e.g.
from .. import a1
) could work around this limitation. However, the script that is being run (in this case
sa1.py
) is considered the "top-level module". Attempting to import anything from a folder above this script results in this error:
ValueError: attempted relative import beyond top-level package
.
My approach is to avoid writing scripts that have to import from the parent directory. In cases where this must happen, the preferred workaround is to modify
sys.path
.
Python 2 vs. Python 3
The most important differences between how Python 2 and Python 3 treat
import
statements have been documented above. They are re-stated again here, along with some other less important differences.
Python 2 supports implicit relative imports. Python 3 does not.
Python 2 requires
__init__.py
files inside a folder in order for the folder to be considered a package and made importable. In Python 3.3 and above, thanks to its support of implicit namespace packages, all folders are packages regardless of the presence of a
__init__.py
file.
In Python 2, one could write
from <module> import *
within a function. In Python 3, the
from <module> import *
syntax is only allowed at the module level, no longer inside functions.
Sources:
Changes in import statement python3
Python modules documentation for Python
2
and
3
What’s New in Python 3.0
Miscellaneous topics and readings not covered here, but worth exploring
using
__all__
variable in
__init__.py
for specifying what gets imported by
from <module> import *
documentation for Python
2
and
3
using if
__name__ == '__main__'
to check if a script is imported or run directly
documentation for Python
2
and
3
installing a project as a package (in developer mode) with
pip install -e <project>
to add the project root directory to
sys.path
How to run tests without installing package?
from <module> import *
does not import names from
<module>
that begin with an underscore
_
documentation for Python
2
and
3 |
| Markdown | [MyBlueLinux.com](https://www.mybluelinux.com/)
##### MyBlueLinux.com
***
- [Home](https://www.mybluelinux.com/)
- [Categories](https://www.mybluelinux.com/categories/)
- [Linux](https://www.mybluelinux.com/categories/linux/)
- [Networking](https://www.mybluelinux.com/categories/networking/)
- [Python](https://www.mybluelinux.com/categories/python/)
- [Security](https://www.mybluelinux.com/categories/security/)
- [Hugo](https://www.mybluelinux.com/categories/hugo/)
# The Definitive Guide to Python import Statements

2020-11-13
[Python](https://www.mybluelinux.com/categories/python/) [Development](https://www.mybluelinux.com/categories/development/)
## Summary / Key Points
- [import](https://docs.python.org/3/reference/import.html) statements search through the list of paths in [sys.path](https://docs.python.org/3/library/sys.html#sys.path)
- [sys.path](https://docs.python.org/3/library/sys.html#sys.path) always includes the path of the script invoked on the command line and is agnostic to the working directory on the command line.
- importing a [package](https://docs.python.org/3/glossary.html#term-package) is conceptually the same as importing that package’s [\_\_init\_\_.py](https://www.mybluelinux.com/python-whats-init-for-me/) file
## Basic Definitions
- **module**: any **\*.py** file. Its name is the file name.
- **built-in module**: a 'module' (written in C) that is compiled into the Python interpreter, and therefore does not have a \*.py file.
- **package**: any folder containing a file named [\_\_init\_\_.py](https://www.mybluelinux.com/python-whats-init-for-me/) in it. Its name is the name of the folder.
- in Python 3.3 and above, any folder (even without a [\_\_init\_\_.py](https://www.mybluelinux.com/python-whats-init-for-me/) file) is considered a package
- **object**: in Python, almost everything is an object - functions, classes, variables, etc.
## Packages
Python has only one type of module object, and all modules are of this type, regardless of whether the module is implemented in Python, C, or something else. To help organize modules and provide a naming hierarchy, Python has a concept of [packages](https://docs.python.org/3/glossary.html#term-package) .
**You can think of packages as the directories on a file system and modules as files within directories**, but don’t take this analogy too literally since packages and modules need not originate from the file system. For the purposes of this documentation, we’ll use this convenient analogy of directories and files. Like file system directories, packages are organized hierarchically, and packages may themselves contain subpackages, as well as regular modules.
It’s important to keep in mind that all packages are modules, but not all modules are packages. Or put another way, packages are just a special kind of module. Specifically, any module that contains a `__path__` attribute is considered a package.
All modules have a name. Subpackage names are separated from their parent package name by a dot, akin to Python’s standard attribute access syntax. Thus you might have a module called [sys](https://docs.python.org/3/library/sys.html#module-sys) and a package called [email](https://docs.python.org/3/library/email.html#module-email) , which in turn has a subpackage called [email.mime](https://docs.python.org/3/library/email.mime.html#module-email.mime) and a module within that subpackage called **email.mime.text**.
## What is an python import
When a module is imported, Python runs all of the code in the module file. When a package is imported, Python runs all of the code in the package’s [\_\_init\_\_.py](https://www.mybluelinux.com/python-whats-init-for-me/) file, if such a file exists. All of the objects defined in the module or the package’s [\_\_init\_\_.py](https://www.mybluelinux.com/python-whats-init-for-me/) file are made available to the importer.
## Basics of the Python import and sys.path
According to Python documentation, here is how an import statement searches for the correct module or package to import:
#### Basics of the Python import and sys.path
When a module named **spam** is imported, the interpreter first searches for a built-in module with that name. If not found, it then searches for a file named **spam.py** in a list of directories given by the variable [sys.path](https://docs.python.org/3/library/sys.html#sys.path) . [sys.path](https://docs.python.org/3/library/sys.html#sys.path) is initialized from these locations:
- The directory containing the input script (or the current directory when no file is specified).
- [PYTHONPATH](https://docs.python.org/3/using/cmdline.html#envvar-PYTHONPATH) (a list of directory names, with the same syntax as the shell variable **PATH**).
- The installation-dependent default.
***
After initialization, Python programs can modify [sys.path](https://docs.python.org/3/library/sys.html#sys.path) . The directory containing the script being run is placed at the beginning of the search path, ahead of the standard library path. This means that scripts in that directory will be loaded instead of modules of the same name in the library directory.
Technically, Python’s documentation is incomplete. The interpreter will not only look for a file (i.e., module) named **spam.py**, it will also look for a folder (i.e., package) named **spam**.
Note that the Python interpreter first searches through the list of *built-in modules*, modules that are compiled directly into the Python interpreter. This list of built-in modules is installation-dependent and can be found in **sys.builtin\_module\_names** (Python [2](https://docs.python.org/2/library/sys.html#sys.builtin_module_names) and [3](https://docs.python.org/3/library/sys.html#sys.builtin_module_names) ).
Unlike *built-in modules* which are first in the search path, the rest of the modules in Python’s standard library (not built-ins) come after the directory of the current script. This leads to confusing behavior: it is possible to "replace" some but not all modules in Python’s standard library. For example, on my computer (Windows 10, Python 3.6), the **math** module is a built-in module, whereas the **random** module is not. Thus, **import math** in **start.py** will import the math module from the standard library, NOT my own **math.py** file in the same directory. However, **import random** in **start.py** will import my **random.py** file, NOT the **random** module from the standard library.
***
Also, **Python imports are case-sensitive**. **import Spam** is not the same as **import spam**.
The function **pkgutil.iter\_modules** (Python [2](https://docs.python.org/2/library/pkgutil.html#pkgutil.iter_modules) and [3](https://docs.python.org/3/library/pkgutil.html#pkgutil.iter_modules) ) can be used to get a list of all importable modules from a given path:
```
import pkgutil
search_path = ['.'] # set to None to see all modules importable from sys.path
all_modules = [x[1] for x in pkgutil.iter_modules(path=search_path)]
print(all_modules)
```
Sources:
[How to get a list of built-in modules in python?](https://stackoverflow.com/q/8370206)
[What is difference between built-in modules and other modules in Python’s standard library (Issue 2)](https://github.com/chrisyeh96/chrisyeh96.github.io/issues/2)
##### More on sys.path
To see what is in [sys.path](https://docs.python.org/3/library/sys.html#sys.path) , run the following in the interpreter or as a script:
```
import sys
print(sys.path)
# Output on my computer:
['', '/usr/lib/python37.zip', '/usr/lib/python3.7', '/usr/lib/python3.7/lib-dynload', '/usr/local/lib/python3.7/dist-packages', '/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages']
```
#### Python’s documentation for sys.path
A list of strings that specifies the search path for modules. Initialized from the environment variable [PYTHONPATH](https://docs.python.org/3/using/cmdline.html#envvar-PYTHONPATH) , plus an installation-dependent default.
As initialized upon program startup, the first item of this list, **path\[0\]**, is the directory containing the script that was used to invoke the Python interpreter. If the script directory is not available (e.g. if the interpreter is invoked interactively or if the script is read from standard input), **path\[0\]** is the empty string, which directs Python to search modules in the current directory first. Notice that the script directory is inserted before the entries inserted as a result of PYTHONPATH.
***
Source: Python [2](https://docs.python.org/2/library/sys.html#sys.path) and [3](https://docs.python.org/3/library/sys.html#sys.path)
The documentation for Python’s command line interface adds the following about running scripts from the command line. Specifically, when running python `<script>.py`, then…
If the script name refers directly to a Python file, the directory containing that file is added to the start of **sys.path**, and the file is executed as the **main** module.
## Example Directory Structure
```
test/ # root folder
├── packA/ # package packA
│  ├── __init__.py
│  ├── a1.py
│  ├── a2.py
│  └── subA/ # subpackage subA
│  ├── __init__.py
│  ├── sa1.py
│  └── sa2.py
├── packB/ # package packB (implicit namespace package)
│  ├── b1.py
│  └── b2.py
├── math.py
├── random.py
├── other.py
└── start.py
```
Note that we do not place a [\_\_init\_\_.py](https://www.mybluelinux.com/python-whats-init-for-me/) file in our root **test/** folder.
Example Directory Structure
# Example Directory Structure
```
test/ # root folder
├── packA/ # package packA
│  ├── __init__.py
│  ├── a1.py
│  ├── a2.py
│  └── subA/ # subpackage subA
│  ├── __init__.py
│  ├── sa1.py
│  └── sa2.py
├── packB/ # package packB (implicit namespace package)
│  ├── b1.py
│  └── b2.py
├── math.py
├── random.py
├── other.py
└── start.py
```
Close
## Recap the order for modules to import:
1. built-in modules from the Python Standard Library (e.g. sys, math)
2. modules or packages in a directory specified by **sys.path**:
- If the Python interpreter is run interactively, **sys.path\[0\]** is the empty string **''**. This tells Python to search the current working directory from which you launched the interpreter, i.e., the output of **pwd** on Unix systems.
- e.g. If we run a script with python `<script>.py`, **sys.path\[0\]** is the path to `<script>.py`.
- directories in the **PYTHONPATH** environment variable
- default **sys.path** locations, including remaining Python Standard Library modules which are not built-in
Note that **when running a Python script, `sys.path` doesn’t care what your current "working directory" is. It only cares about the path to the script**. For example, if my shell is currently at the **test/** folder and I run **python ./packA/subA/subA1.py**, then **sys.path** includes **test/packA/subA/** but **NOT test/**.
***
Additionally, **sys.path** is shared across all imported modules. For example, suppose we call **python start.py**. Let **start.py** import **packA.a1**, and let **a1.py** print out **sys.path**. Then **sys.path** will include **test/** (the path to **start.py**), but **NOT test/packA/** (the path to a1.py). What this means is that **a1.py** can call **import other** since **other.py** is a file in **test/**.
## All about `__init__.py`
An [\_\_init\_\_.py](https://www.mybluelinux.com/python-whats-init-for-me/) file has 2 functions.
convert a folder of scripts into an importable package of modules **(before Python 3.3)**
run package initialization code
##### Converting a folder of scripts into an importable package of modules
In order to import a module or package from a directory that is not in the same directory as the script we are writing (or the directory from which we run the Python interactive interpreter), that module needs to be in a package.
As defined above, any directory with a file named **\_\_init\_\_.py** is a Python package. This file can be empty. For example, when running Python 2.7, **start.py** can import the package **packA** but not **packB** because there is no **\_\_init\_\_.py** file in the **test/packB/** directory.
#### Python’s documentation for sys.path
**This does NOT apply to Python 3.3 and above**, thanks to the adoption of implicit [namespace packages](https://docs.python.org/3/reference/import.html#namespace-packages) . Basically, **Python 3.3+ treats all folders as packages, so empty \_\_init\_\_.py files are no longer necessary** and can be omitted.
For example, **packB** in our example is a [namespace package](https://docs.python.org/3/reference/import.html#namespace-packages) because it doesn’t have a **\_\_init\_\_.py** file in the folder. If we start a Python 3.6 interactive interpreter in the **test/** directory, then we get the following output:
```
>>> import packB
>>> packB
<module 'packB' (namespace)>
```
Sources:
[What’s \_\_init\_\_.py for?](https://www.mybluelinux.com/python-whats-init-for-me/)
[stackoverflow.com](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/448271/what-is-init-py-for)
[PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0420/)
##### Running package initialization code
The first time that a package or one of its modules is imported, Python will execute the **\_\_init\_\_.py** file in the root folder of the package if the file exists. All objects and functions defined in **\_\_init\_\_.py** are considered part of the package namespace.
Consider the following example.
test/packA/a1.py
```
def a1_func():
print("running a1_func()")
```
test/packA/\_\_init\_\_.py
```
## this import makes a1_func directly accessible from packA.a1_func
from packA.a1 import a1_func
def packA_func():
print("running packA_func()")
```
test/start.py
```
import packA # "import packA.a1" will work just the same
packA.packA_func()
packA.a1_func()
packA.a1.a1_func()
```
output of running **python start.py**:
```
~] python start.py
running packA_func()
running a1_func()
running a1_func()
```
If **a1.py** calls **import a2** and we run **python a1.py**, then **test/packA/\_\_init\_\_.py** will NOT be called, even though it seems like **a2** is part of the **packA** package. This is because when Python runs a script (in this case **a1.py**), its containing folder is not considered a package.
## Using Objects from the Imported Module or Package
There are 4 different syntaxes for writing import statements.
- **import \<package\>**
- **import \<module\>**
- **from \<package\> import \<module or subpackage or object\>**
- **from \<module\> import \<object\>**
Let **X** be whatever name comes after **import**.
- If **X** is the name of a module or package, then to use objects defined in **X**, you have to write **X.object**.
- If **X** is a variable name, then it can be used directly.
- If **X** is a function name, then it can be invoked with **X()**
***
Optionally, **as Y** can be added after any **import X** statement: **import X as Y**. This renames **X** to **Y** within the script. Note that the name **X** itself is no longer valid. A common example is **import numpy as np**.
***
The argument to the **import** function can be a single name, or a list of multiple names. Each of these names can be optionally renamed via **as**. For example, this would be a valid import statement in start.py:
**import packA as pA, packA.a1, packA.subA.sa1 as sa1**
Example: **start.py** needs to import the **helloWorld()** function in **sa1.py**
Solution 1: `from packA.subA.sa1 import helloWorld`
we can call the function directly by name: **x = helloWorld()**
Solution 2: `from packA.subA import sa1` or equivalently `import packA.subA.sa1 as sa1`
we have to prefix the function name with the name of the module: **x = sa1.helloWorld()**
This is sometimes preferred over Solution 1 in order to make it explicit that we are calling the **helloWorld** function from the **sa1** module.
Solution 3: `import packA.subA.sa1`
we need to use the full path: **x = packA.subA.sa1.helloWorld()**
##### Use dir() to examine the contents of an imported module
After importing a module, use the [dir()](https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#dir) function to get a list of accessible names from the module. For example, suppose I import **sa1**. If **sa1.py** defines a **helloWorld()** function, then **dir(sa1)** would include **helloWorld**.
```
>>> from packA.subA import sa1
>>> dir(sa1)
['__builtins__', '__cached__', '__doc__', '__file__', '__loader__', '__name__', '__package__', '__spec__', 'helloWorld']
```
##### Importing Packages
Importing a package is conceptually equivalent to importing the package’s **\_\_init\_\_.py** file as a module. Indeed, this is what Python treats the package as:
```
>>> import packA
>>> packA
<module 'packA' from 'packA\__init__.py'>
```
Only objects declared in the imported package’s **\_\_init\_\_.py** are accessible to the importer. For example, since **packB** lacks a **\_\_init\_\_.py** file, calling **import packB** (in Python 3.3+) has very little use because no objects in the **packB** package are made available. A subsequent call to **packB.b1** would fail because it has not been imported yet.
## Absolute vs. Relative Import
An **absolute import** uses the full path (starting from the project’s root folder) to the desired module to import.
A **relative import** uses the relative path (starting from the path of the current module) to the desired module to import. There are two types of relative imports:
- an **explicit** relative import follows the format `from .<module/package> import X`, where `<module/package>` is prefixed by dots `.` that indicate how many directories upwards to traverse. A single dot `.` corresponds to the current directory; two dots `..` indicate one folder up; etc.
- an **implicit** relative import is written as if the current directory is part of **sys.path**. **Implicit relative imports are only supported in Python 2. They are NOT SUPPORTED IN PYTHON 3**.
The Python documentation says the following about Python 3’s handling of relative imports:
> The only acceptable syntax for relative imports is `from .[module] import name`. All import forms not starting with . are interpreted as absolute imports.
>
> Source: [What’s New in Python 3.0](https://docs.python.org/3.0/whatsnew/3.0.html)
For example, suppose we are running **start.py** which imports **a1** which in turn imports **other**, **a2**, and **sa1**. Then the import statements in **a1.py** would look as follows:
**absolute imports:**
```
import other
import packA.a2
import packA.subA.sa1
```
**explicit relative imports:**
```
import other
from . import a2
from .subA import sa1
```
**implicit relative imports (NOT SUPPORTED IN PYTHON 3):**
```
import other
import a2
import subA.sa1
```
Note that for relative imports, the dots `.` can go up only up to **(but not including)** the directory containing the script run from the command line. Thus, `from .. import other` is invalid in **a1.py**. Doing so results in the error **ValueError: attempted relative import beyond top-level package**.
In general, **absolute imports are preferred over relative imports**. They avoid the confusion between explicit vs. implicit relative imports. In addition, any script that uses explicit relative imports cannot be run directly:
Note that relative imports are based on the name of the current module. Since the name of the main module is always "**main**", modules intended for use as the main module of a Python application must always use absolute imports.
***
Source: Python [2](https://docs.python.org/2/tutorial/modules.html#intra-package-references) and [3](https://docs.python.org/3/tutorial/modules.html#intra-package-references)
Sources:
[How to accomplish relative import in python](https://stackoverflow.com/q/4655526)
[Changes in import statement python3](https://stackoverflow.com/q/12172791)
## Case Examples
##### Case 1: sys.path is known ahead of time
If you only ever call **python start.py** or **python other.py**, then it is very easy to set up the imports for all of the modules. In this case, [sys.path](https://docs.python.org/3/library/sys.html#sys.path) will always include **test/** in its search path. Therefore, all of the import statements can be written relative to the **test/** folder.
Ex: a file in the **test** project needs to import the **helloWorld()** function in **sa1.py**
- Solution: **from packA.subA.sa1 import helloWorld** (or any of the other equivalent import syntaxes demonstrated above)
##### Case 2: sys.path could change
Often, we want to be flexible in how we use a Python script, whether run directly on the command line or imported as a module into another script. As shown below, this is where we run into problems, especially on Python 3.
**Example**: Suppose **start.py** needs to import **a2** which needs to import **sa2**. Assume that **start.py** is always run directly, never imported. We also want to be able to run **a2** on its own.
*Seems easy enough, right? After all, we just need 2 import statements total: 1 in **start.py** and another in **a2.py**.*
**Problem**: This is clearly a case where [sys.path](https://docs.python.org/3/library/sys.html#sys.path) changes. When we run **start.py**, **sys.path** contains **test/**. When we run **a2.py**, [sys.path](https://docs.python.org/3/library/sys.html#sys.path) contains **test/packA/**.
The import statement in **start.py** is easy. Since **start.py** it is always run directly and never imported, we know that **test/** will always be in **sys.path** when it is run. Then importing **a2** is simply **import packA.a2**.
The import statement in **a2.py** is trickier. When we run **start.py** directly, **sys.path** contains **test/**, so **a2.py** should call **from packA.subA import sa2**. However, if we instead run **a2.py** directly, then **sys.path** contains **test/packA/**. Now the import would fail because **packA** is not a folder inside **test/packA/**.
Instead, we could try **from subA import sa2**. This corrects the problem when we run **a2.py** directly. But now we have a problem when we run **start.py** directly. Under Python 3, this fails because **subA** is not in **sys.path**. (This is OK in Python 2, thanks to its support for implicit relative imports.)
Let’s summarize our findings about the import statement in **a2.py**:
| Run | from packA.subA import sa2 | from subA import sa2 |
|---|---|---|
| start.py | OK | Py2 OK, Py3 fail (subA not in test/) |
| a2.py | fail (packA not in test/packA/) | OK |
For completeness sake, I also tried using relative imports: **from .subA import sa2**. This matches the result of **from packA.subA import sa2**.
**Solutions (Workarounds)**: I am unaware of a clean solution to this problem. Here are some workarounds:
- Use absolute imports rooted at the **test/** directory (i.e., middle column in the table above). This guarantees that running **start.py** directly will always work. In order to run **a2.py** directly, run it as an imported module instead of as a script:
1. change directories to **test/** in the console
2. **python -m packA.a2**
- Use absolute imports rooted at the **test/** directory (i.e., middle column in the table above). This guarantees that running **start.py** directly will always work. In order to run **a2.py** directly, we can modify **sys.path** in **a2.py** to include **test/**, before **sa2** is imported.
```
import os, sys
sys.path.append(os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(os.path.realpath(__file__))))
# now this works, even when a2.py is run directly
from packA.subA import sa2
```
NOTE: This method usually works. However, under some Python installations, the `__file__` variable might not be correct. In this case, we would need to use the Python built-in [inspect](https://docs.python.org/3/library/inspect.html) package. See [this StackOverflow answer](https://stackoverflow.com/a/11158224) for instructions.
- Only use Python 2, and use implicit relative imports (i.e., the right column in the table above).
- Use absolute imports rooted at the **test/** directory, and add **test/** to the **PYTHONPATH** environment variable.
1. This solution is not portable, so I recommend against it.
2. instructions here: [Permanently add a directory to PYTHONPATH](https://stackoverflow.com/q/3402168)
##### Case 3: Importing from Parent Directory
If we do not modify **PYTHONPATH** and avoid modifying **sys.path** programmatically, then the following is a major limitation of Python imports:
When running a script directly, it is impossible to import anything from its parent directory.
For example, if I were to run **python sa1.py**, then it is impossible for **sa1.py** to import anything from **a1.py** without resorting to a **PYTHONPATH** or **sys.path** workaround.
At first, it may seem that relative imports (e.g. **from .. import a1**) could work around this limitation. However, the script that is being run (in this case **sa1.py**) is considered the "top-level module". Attempting to import anything from a folder above this script results in this error: **ValueError: attempted relative import beyond top-level package**.
My approach is to avoid writing scripts that have to import from the parent directory. In cases where this must happen, the preferred workaround is to modify **sys.path**.
## Python 2 vs. Python 3
The most important differences between how Python 2 and Python 3 treat **import** statements have been documented above. They are re-stated again here, along with some other less important differences.
- Python 2 supports implicit relative imports. Python 3 does not.
- Python 2 requires **\_\_init\_\_.py** files inside a folder in order for the folder to be considered a package and made importable. In Python 3.3 and above, thanks to its support of implicit namespace packages, all folders are packages regardless of the presence of a **\_\_init\_\_.py** file.
- In Python 2, one could write `from <module> import *` within a function. In Python 3, the `from <module> import *` syntax is only allowed at the module level, no longer inside functions.
Sources:
[Changes in import statement python3](https://stackoverflow.com/q/12172791)
Python modules documentation for Python [2](https://docs.python.org/2/tutorial/modules.html#intra-package-references) and [3](https://docs.python.org/3/tutorial/modules.html#intra-package-references)
[What’s New in Python 3.0](https://docs.python.org/3.0/whatsnew/3.0.html)
## Miscellaneous topics and readings not covered here, but worth exploring
- using `__all__` variable in `__init__.py` for specifying what gets imported by `from <module> import *`
- documentation for Python [2](https://docs.python.org/2/tutorial/modules.html#importing-from-a-package) and [3](https://docs.python.org/3/tutorial/modules.html#importing-from-a-package)
- using if `__name__ == '__main__'` to check if a script is imported or run directly
- documentation for Python [2](https://docs.python.org/2/library/__main__.html) and [3](https://docs.python.org/3/library/__main__.html)
- installing a project as a package (in developer mode) with `pip install -e <project>` to add the project root directory to **sys.path**
- [How to run tests without installing package?](https://stackoverflow.com/q/23984973)
- `from <module> import *` does not import names from `<module>` that begin with an underscore `_`
- documentation for Python [2](https://docs.python.org/2/tutorial/modules.html#more-on-modules) and [3](https://docs.python.org/3/tutorial/modules.html#more-on-modules)
[python](https://www.mybluelinux.com/tags/python/)
[« Previous article AWK as Grep](https://www.mybluelinux.com/awk-as-grep/)
[Next article » How to remove/delete CTRL-M (^M) characters from text files in Linux and UNIX systems](https://www.mybluelinux.com/how-to-remove/delete-ctrl-m-m-characters-from-text-files-in-linux-and-unix-systems/)

[Architecture](https://www.mybluelinux.com/categories/architecture/)

[Bash](https://www.mybluelinux.com/categories/bash/)

[Databases](https://www.mybluelinux.com/categories/databases/)

[Debian](https://www.mybluelinux.com/categories/debian/)

[Development](https://www.mybluelinux.com/categories/development/)

[Django](https://www.mybluelinux.com/categories/django/)

[Hardware](https://www.mybluelinux.com/categories/hardware/)

[Hugo](https://www.mybluelinux.com/categories/hugo/)

[Linux](https://www.mybluelinux.com/categories/linux/)

[Linux Utilities](https://www.mybluelinux.com/categories/linux-utilities/)

[Monitoring](https://www.mybluelinux.com/categories/monitoring/)

[Networking](https://www.mybluelinux.com/categories/networking/)

[Python](https://www.mybluelinux.com/categories/python/)

[Security](https://www.mybluelinux.com/categories/security/)

[Virtualization](https://www.mybluelinux.com/categories/virtualization/)

[Web Servers](https://www.mybluelinux.com/categories/web-servers/)

[Windows](https://www.mybluelinux.com/categories/windows/)
Please enable JavaScript to view the [comments powered by Disqus.](https://disqus.com/?ref_noscript)
[comments powered by Disqus](https://disqus.com/)

© 2026 @RaMa. Generated with [Hugo](https://gohugo.io/) and [Mainroad](https://github.com/Vimux/Mainroad/) theme. |
| Readable Markdown | ## Summary / Key Points
## Basic Definitions
## Packages
Python has only one type of module object, and all modules are of this type, regardless of whether the module is implemented in Python, C, or something else. To help organize modules and provide a naming hierarchy, Python has a concept of [packages](https://docs.python.org/3/glossary.html#term-package) .
**You can think of packages as the directories on a file system and modules as files within directories**, but don’t take this analogy too literally since packages and modules need not originate from the file system. For the purposes of this documentation, we’ll use this convenient analogy of directories and files. Like file system directories, packages are organized hierarchically, and packages may themselves contain subpackages, as well as regular modules.
It’s important to keep in mind that all packages are modules, but not all modules are packages. Or put another way, packages are just a special kind of module. Specifically, any module that contains a `__path__` attribute is considered a package.
All modules have a name. Subpackage names are separated from their parent package name by a dot, akin to Python’s standard attribute access syntax. Thus you might have a module called [sys](https://docs.python.org/3/library/sys.html#module-sys) and a package called [email](https://docs.python.org/3/library/email.html#module-email) , which in turn has a subpackage called [email.mime](https://docs.python.org/3/library/email.mime.html#module-email.mime) and a module within that subpackage called **email.mime.text**.
## What is an python import
When a module is imported, Python runs all of the code in the module file. When a package is imported, Python runs all of the code in the package’s [\_\_init\_\_.py](https://www.mybluelinux.com/python-whats-init-for-me/) file, if such a file exists. All of the objects defined in the module or the package’s [\_\_init\_\_.py](https://www.mybluelinux.com/python-whats-init-for-me/) file are made available to the importer.
## Basics of the Python import and sys.path
According to Python documentation, here is how an import statement searches for the correct module or package to import:
Technically, Python’s documentation is incomplete. The interpreter will not only look for a file (i.e., module) named **spam.py**, it will also look for a folder (i.e., package) named **spam**.
Note that the Python interpreter first searches through the list of *built-in modules*, modules that are compiled directly into the Python interpreter. This list of built-in modules is installation-dependent and can be found in **sys.builtin\_module\_names** (Python [2](https://docs.python.org/2/library/sys.html#sys.builtin_module_names) and [3](https://docs.python.org/3/library/sys.html#sys.builtin_module_names) ).
The function **pkgutil.iter\_modules** (Python [2](https://docs.python.org/2/library/pkgutil.html#pkgutil.iter_modules) and [3](https://docs.python.org/3/library/pkgutil.html#pkgutil.iter_modules) ) can be used to get a list of all importable modules from a given path:
```
import pkgutil
search_path = ['.'] # set to None to see all modules importable from sys.path
all_modules = [x[1] for x in pkgutil.iter_modules(path=search_path)]
print(all_modules)
```
Sources:
[How to get a list of built-in modules in python?](https://stackoverflow.com/q/8370206)
[What is difference between built-in modules and other modules in Python’s standard library (Issue 2)](https://github.com/chrisyeh96/chrisyeh96.github.io/issues/2)
##### More on sys.path
To see what is in [sys.path](https://docs.python.org/3/library/sys.html#sys.path) , run the following in the interpreter or as a script:
```
import sys
print(sys.path)
# Output on my computer:
['', '/usr/lib/python37.zip', '/usr/lib/python3.7', '/usr/lib/python3.7/lib-dynload', '/usr/local/lib/python3.7/dist-packages', '/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages']
```
The documentation for Python’s command line interface adds the following about running scripts from the command line. Specifically, when running python `<script>.py`, then…
## Example Directory Structure
```
test/ # root folder
├── packA/ # package packA
│  ├── __init__.py
│  ├── a1.py
│  ├── a2.py
│  └── subA/ # subpackage subA
│  ├── __init__.py
│  ├── sa1.py
│  └── sa2.py
├── packB/ # package packB (implicit namespace package)
│  ├── b1.py
│  └── b2.py
├── math.py
├── random.py
├── other.py
└── start.py
```
Note that we do not place a [\_\_init\_\_.py](https://www.mybluelinux.com/python-whats-init-for-me/) file in our root **test/** folder.
## Recap the order for modules to import:
1. built-in modules from the Python Standard Library (e.g. sys, math)
2. modules or packages in a directory specified by **sys.path**:
- If the Python interpreter is run interactively, **sys.path\[0\]** is the empty string **''**. This tells Python to search the current working directory from which you launched the interpreter, i.e., the output of **pwd** on Unix systems.
- e.g. If we run a script with python `<script>.py`, **sys.path\[0\]** is the path to `<script>.py`.
- directories in the **PYTHONPATH** environment variable
- default **sys.path** locations, including remaining Python Standard Library modules which are not built-in
## All about `__init__.py`
An [\_\_init\_\_.py](https://www.mybluelinux.com/python-whats-init-for-me/) file has 2 functions.
convert a folder of scripts into an importable package of modules **(before Python 3.3)**
run package initialization code
##### Converting a folder of scripts into an importable package of modules
In order to import a module or package from a directory that is not in the same directory as the script we are writing (or the directory from which we run the Python interactive interpreter), that module needs to be in a package.
As defined above, any directory with a file named **\_\_init\_\_.py** is a Python package. This file can be empty. For example, when running Python 2.7, **start.py** can import the package **packA** but not **packB** because there is no **\_\_init\_\_.py** file in the **test/packB/** directory.
For example, **packB** in our example is a [namespace package](https://docs.python.org/3/reference/import.html#namespace-packages) because it doesn’t have a **\_\_init\_\_.py** file in the folder. If we start a Python 3.6 interactive interpreter in the **test/** directory, then we get the following output:
```
>>> import packB
>>> packB
<module 'packB' (namespace)>
```
Sources:
[What’s \_\_init\_\_.py for?](https://www.mybluelinux.com/python-whats-init-for-me/)
[stackoverflow.com](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/448271/what-is-init-py-for)
[PEP 420: Implicit Namespace Packages](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0420/)
##### Running package initialization code
The first time that a package or one of its modules is imported, Python will execute the **\_\_init\_\_.py** file in the root folder of the package if the file exists. All objects and functions defined in **\_\_init\_\_.py** are considered part of the package namespace.
Consider the following example.
test/packA/a1.py
```
def a1_func():
print("running a1_func()")
```
test/packA/\_\_init\_\_.py
```
## this import makes a1_func directly accessible from packA.a1_func
from packA.a1 import a1_func
def packA_func():
print("running packA_func()")
```
test/start.py
```
import packA # "import packA.a1" will work just the same
packA.packA_func()
packA.a1_func()
packA.a1.a1_func()
```
output of running **python start.py**:
```
~] python start.py
running packA_func()
running a1_func()
running a1_func()
```
## Using Objects from the Imported Module or Package
Example: **start.py** needs to import the **helloWorld()** function in **sa1.py**
Solution 1: `from packA.subA.sa1 import helloWorld`
we can call the function directly by name: **x = helloWorld()**
Solution 2: `from packA.subA import sa1` or equivalently `import packA.subA.sa1 as sa1`
we have to prefix the function name with the name of the module: **x = sa1.helloWorld()**
This is sometimes preferred over Solution 1 in order to make it explicit that we are calling the **helloWorld** function from the **sa1** module.
Solution 3: `import packA.subA.sa1`
we need to use the full path: **x = packA.subA.sa1.helloWorld()**
##### Use dir() to examine the contents of an imported module
After importing a module, use the [dir()](https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#dir) function to get a list of accessible names from the module. For example, suppose I import **sa1**. If **sa1.py** defines a **helloWorld()** function, then **dir(sa1)** would include **helloWorld**.
```
>>> from packA.subA import sa1
>>> dir(sa1)
['__builtins__', '__cached__', '__doc__', '__file__', '__loader__', '__name__', '__package__', '__spec__', 'helloWorld']
```
##### Importing Packages
Importing a package is conceptually equivalent to importing the package’s **\_\_init\_\_.py** file as a module. Indeed, this is what Python treats the package as:
```
>>> import packA
>>> packA
<module 'packA' from 'packA\__init__.py'>
```
Only objects declared in the imported package’s **\_\_init\_\_.py** are accessible to the importer. For example, since **packB** lacks a **\_\_init\_\_.py** file, calling **import packB** (in Python 3.3+) has very little use because no objects in the **packB** package are made available. A subsequent call to **packB.b1** would fail because it has not been imported yet.
## Absolute vs. Relative Import
The Python documentation says the following about Python 3’s handling of relative imports:
> The only acceptable syntax for relative imports is `from .[module] import name`. All import forms not starting with . are interpreted as absolute imports.
>
> Source: [What’s New in Python 3.0](https://docs.python.org/3.0/whatsnew/3.0.html)
For example, suppose we are running **start.py** which imports **a1** which in turn imports **other**, **a2**, and **sa1**. Then the import statements in **a1.py** would look as follows:
**absolute imports:**
```
import other
import packA.a2
import packA.subA.sa1
```
**explicit relative imports:**
```
import other
from . import a2
from .subA import sa1
```
**implicit relative imports (NOT SUPPORTED IN PYTHON 3):**
```
import other
import a2
import subA.sa1
```
Sources:
[How to accomplish relative import in python](https://stackoverflow.com/q/4655526)
[Changes in import statement python3](https://stackoverflow.com/q/12172791)
## Case Examples
##### Case 1: sys.path is known ahead of time
If you only ever call **python start.py** or **python other.py**, then it is very easy to set up the imports for all of the modules. In this case, [sys.path](https://docs.python.org/3/library/sys.html#sys.path) will always include **test/** in its search path. Therefore, all of the import statements can be written relative to the **test/** folder.
Ex: a file in the **test** project needs to import the **helloWorld()** function in **sa1.py**
- Solution: **from packA.subA.sa1 import helloWorld** (or any of the other equivalent import syntaxes demonstrated above)
##### Case 2: sys.path could change
Often, we want to be flexible in how we use a Python script, whether run directly on the command line or imported as a module into another script. As shown below, this is where we run into problems, especially on Python 3.
**Example**: Suppose **start.py** needs to import **a2** which needs to import **sa2**. Assume that **start.py** is always run directly, never imported. We also want to be able to run **a2** on its own.
*Seems easy enough, right? After all, we just need 2 import statements total: 1 in **start.py** and another in **a2.py**.*
**Problem**: This is clearly a case where [sys.path](https://docs.python.org/3/library/sys.html#sys.path) changes. When we run **start.py**, **sys.path** contains **test/**. When we run **a2.py**, [sys.path](https://docs.python.org/3/library/sys.html#sys.path) contains **test/packA/**.
The import statement in **start.py** is easy. Since **start.py** it is always run directly and never imported, we know that **test/** will always be in **sys.path** when it is run. Then importing **a2** is simply **import packA.a2**.
The import statement in **a2.py** is trickier. When we run **start.py** directly, **sys.path** contains **test/**, so **a2.py** should call **from packA.subA import sa2**. However, if we instead run **a2.py** directly, then **sys.path** contains **test/packA/**. Now the import would fail because **packA** is not a folder inside **test/packA/**.
Instead, we could try **from subA import sa2**. This corrects the problem when we run **a2.py** directly. But now we have a problem when we run **start.py** directly. Under Python 3, this fails because **subA** is not in **sys.path**. (This is OK in Python 2, thanks to its support for implicit relative imports.)
Let’s summarize our findings about the import statement in **a2.py**:
| Run | from packA.subA import sa2 | from subA import sa2 |
|---|---|---|
| start.py | OK | Py2 OK, Py3 fail (subA not in test/) |
| a2.py | fail (packA not in test/packA/) | OK |
For completeness sake, I also tried using relative imports: **from .subA import sa2**. This matches the result of **from packA.subA import sa2**.
**Solutions (Workarounds)**: I am unaware of a clean solution to this problem. Here are some workarounds:
- Use absolute imports rooted at the **test/** directory (i.e., middle column in the table above). This guarantees that running **start.py** directly will always work. In order to run **a2.py** directly, run it as an imported module instead of as a script:
1. change directories to **test/** in the console
2. **python -m packA.a2**
- Use absolute imports rooted at the **test/** directory (i.e., middle column in the table above). This guarantees that running **start.py** directly will always work. In order to run **a2.py** directly, we can modify **sys.path** in **a2.py** to include **test/**, before **sa2** is imported.
```
import os, sys
sys.path.append(os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(os.path.realpath(__file__))))
# now this works, even when a2.py is run directly
from packA.subA import sa2
```
NOTE: This method usually works. However, under some Python installations, the `__file__` variable might not be correct. In this case, we would need to use the Python built-in [inspect](https://docs.python.org/3/library/inspect.html) package. See [this StackOverflow answer](https://stackoverflow.com/a/11158224) for instructions.
- Only use Python 2, and use implicit relative imports (i.e., the right column in the table above).
- Use absolute imports rooted at the **test/** directory, and add **test/** to the **PYTHONPATH** environment variable.
1. This solution is not portable, so I recommend against it.
2. instructions here: [Permanently add a directory to PYTHONPATH](https://stackoverflow.com/q/3402168)
##### Case 3: Importing from Parent Directory
If we do not modify **PYTHONPATH** and avoid modifying **sys.path** programmatically, then the following is a major limitation of Python imports:
For example, if I were to run **python sa1.py**, then it is impossible for **sa1.py** to import anything from **a1.py** without resorting to a **PYTHONPATH** or **sys.path** workaround.
At first, it may seem that relative imports (e.g. **from .. import a1**) could work around this limitation. However, the script that is being run (in this case **sa1.py**) is considered the "top-level module". Attempting to import anything from a folder above this script results in this error: **ValueError: attempted relative import beyond top-level package**.
My approach is to avoid writing scripts that have to import from the parent directory. In cases where this must happen, the preferred workaround is to modify **sys.path**.
## Python 2 vs. Python 3
The most important differences between how Python 2 and Python 3 treat **import** statements have been documented above. They are re-stated again here, along with some other less important differences.
- Python 2 supports implicit relative imports. Python 3 does not.
- Python 2 requires **\_\_init\_\_.py** files inside a folder in order for the folder to be considered a package and made importable. In Python 3.3 and above, thanks to its support of implicit namespace packages, all folders are packages regardless of the presence of a **\_\_init\_\_.py** file.
- In Python 2, one could write `from <module> import *` within a function. In Python 3, the `from <module> import *` syntax is only allowed at the module level, no longer inside functions.
Sources:
[Changes in import statement python3](https://stackoverflow.com/q/12172791)
Python modules documentation for Python [2](https://docs.python.org/2/tutorial/modules.html#intra-package-references) and [3](https://docs.python.org/3/tutorial/modules.html#intra-package-references)
[What’s New in Python 3.0](https://docs.python.org/3.0/whatsnew/3.0.html)
## Miscellaneous topics and readings not covered here, but worth exploring
- using `__all__` variable in `__init__.py` for specifying what gets imported by `from <module> import *`
- documentation for Python [2](https://docs.python.org/2/tutorial/modules.html#importing-from-a-package) and [3](https://docs.python.org/3/tutorial/modules.html#importing-from-a-package)
- using if `__name__ == '__main__'` to check if a script is imported or run directly
- documentation for Python [2](https://docs.python.org/2/library/__main__.html) and [3](https://docs.python.org/3/library/__main__.html)
- installing a project as a package (in developer mode) with `pip install -e <project>` to add the project root directory to **sys.path**
- [How to run tests without installing package?](https://stackoverflow.com/q/23984973)
- `from <module> import *` does not import names from `<module>` that begin with an underscore `_`
- documentation for Python [2](https://docs.python.org/2/tutorial/modules.html#more-on-modules) and [3](https://docs.python.org/3/tutorial/modules.html#more-on-modules) |
| Shard | 9 (laksa) |
| Root Hash | 5569300173989372809 |
| Unparsed URL | com,mybluelinux!www,/the-definitive-guide-to-python-import-statements/ s443 |