🕷️ Crawler Inspector

URL Lookup

Direct Parameter Lookup

Raw Queries and Responses

1. Shard Calculation

Query:
Response:
Calculated Shard: 104 (from laksa151)

2. Crawled Status Check

Query:
Response:

3. Robots.txt Check

Query:
Response:

4. Spam/Ban Check

Query:
Response:

5. Seen Status Check

ℹ️ Skipped - page is already crawled

📄
INDEXABLE
✅
CRAWLED
6 days ago
🤖
ROBOTS ALLOWED

Page Info Filters

FilterStatusConditionDetails
HTTP statusPASSdownload_http_code = 200HTTP 200
Age cutoffPASSdownload_stamp > now() - 6 MONTH0.2 months ago
History dropPASSisNull(history_drop_reason)No drop reason
Spam/banPASSfh_dont_index != 1 AND ml_spam_score = 0ml_spam_score=0
CanonicalPASSmeta_canonical IS NULL OR = '' OR = src_unparsedNot set

Page Details

PropertyValue
URLhttps://www.ms.now/opinion/trump-tariff-illegal-supreme-court
Last Crawled2026-04-17 14:19:04 (6 days ago)
First Indexed2026-03-01 11:31:42 (1 month ago)
HTTP Status Code200
Content
Meta TitleHow Congress can give Americans some relief from the costs of Trump's illegal tariffs
Meta DescriptionCongress can pass a bipartisan law to help American businesses and taxpayers recover money lost under Trump’s illegal tariff system.
Meta Canonicalnull
Boilerpipe Text
Mar. 1, 2026, 6:00 AM EST By  Ray Brescia Looking back to Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign promises, two currently stand out: He was going to release the Jeffrey Epstein files and he pledged to impose sweeping tariffs.  When he didn’t make good on the first vow, several members of the president’s party in Congress bucked him to help pass the bipartisan Epstein Files Transparency Act . When President Trump fulfilled his second promise regarding tariffs, the Supreme Court found them illegal , but failed to create a clear remedy for the thousands of American businesses that paid roughly $175 billion in tariff revenue collected under that illegal system.  Could a bipartisan coalition in Congress emerge once again to right an egregious wrong? Perhaps it’s time for a “Tariff Transparency and Reparations Act.” In the face of Trump administration intransigence around releasing the Epstein files, Congress passed legislation to force it to do so. Due to that effort, the Justice Department released millions of files. The Epstein files have been an albatross for the administration for months. When the public pressure to release the files became overwhelming, and the administration’s position utterly indefensible, the president succumbed to that pressure — only when it appeared there was no viable path to continue resisting congressional action. Similarly, there is nothing the administration can do to hold onto the money collected through those illegal tariffs, other than to fight a similarly indefensible and illegitimate rear-guard action through the courts. And that is exactly what the administration appears poised to do. Speaking last week before the Economic Club of Dallas, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent expressed his “sense” that payment of the revenue from the tariffs “could be dragged out for weeks, months, years.” He would add, “I got a feeling the American people won’t see it.” Trump has echoed these sentiments: “We’ll end up being in court for the next five years.” Congress can move, and move quickly, to make American businesses and taxpayers whole. In other words, Trump is treating this $175 billion like a bad debt on one of his failed real estate ventures: You can take him to court, but he’ll fight having to pay a penny tooth and nail. What makes this fight different, however, is now he has the full weight and power of the Justice Department behind him, doing his bidding at public expense. But the administration shouldn’t have the last word on the subject. And Congress shouldn’t sit idly by while the administration treats this money like its own, forcing businesses and taxpayers to go through the trouble and expense of having to claw back what is rightfully theirs. Just as in the case of the Epstein files, a bipartisan coalition should agree that when Americans have been victimized by lawless action — here, businesses and taxpayers who forked over billions in illegal tariffs — the administration should not stand in the way of real relief for those victims. This harm certainly pales in comparison to the damage done to the survivors at the hands of the Epstein class. Here though, it is difficult to obscure, obfuscate or ignore the perpetrator and the victims: The administration imposed lawless tariffs, and the rule of law requires it to return the fees collected to those who paid them. On Monday, a group of Democratic senators released a bill that takes steps in this direction , but it leaves the details to the administration. In the case of the Epstein files, we see where that has led us, with the administration continuing to drag its feet when it comes to releasing the files, even when ordered to do so by Congress. Instead of relying on the administration to reimburse Americans fairly and expeditiously, Congress can create an independent fund capitalized by the billions taken in as illegal tariffs. A special master can then assess these claims. When the claimant can show that they did not simply pass the costs on to their customers, they can receive a refund. If the company did not absorb the costs of the tariffs, that money could stay in the fund and serve as the basis of a rebate to taxpayers. Congress does this sort of thing with some frequency, as in the wake of the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001 , for those exposed to the toxic chemicals at the Camp Lejeune military base , and those harmed in the Deepwater Horizon disaster through the Gulf Coast Restoration Trust Fund . While such interventions typically follow a national disaster, here, the disaster for the economy was the president’s illegal tariffs. And the federal government is literally holding the bag. With the illegal tariffs the administration collected, Congress can move, and move quickly, to make American businesses and taxpayers whole, and can do so without taking it on faith that the administration will follow the law. Ray Brescia Ray Brescia is a professor of law at Albany Law School and author of the book “The Private Is Political: Identity and Democracy in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism.”
Markdown
[Skip to content](https://www.ms.now/opinion/trump-tariff-illegal-supreme-court#wp--skip-link--target) [Opinion](https://www.ms.now/opinion) [Morning Joe](https://www.ms.now/morning-joe) [RacheL Maddow](https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show) [Deadline: White House](https://www.ms.now/deadline-white-house) [The weekend](https://www.ms.now/the-weekend) [NEWSLETTERS](https://www.ms.now/newsletters) ## Featured Shows [![](https://www.ms.now/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/RACHEL_MADDOW_THUMB_480x720.png)](https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show) **the rachel maddow show**mondays 9pm et [![](https://www.ms.now/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/MORNING_JOE_THUMB_480x720.png)](https://www.ms.now/morning-joe) **morning joe**weekdays 6am et [![](https://www.ms.now/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/DEADLINE_WH_THUMB_480x720.png)](https://www.ms.now/deadline-white-house) **deadline: white house with nicolle wallace**weekdays 4pm et [![](https://www.ms.now/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/THE_BEAT_THUMB_480x720.png)](https://www.ms.now/the-beat-with-ari-melber) **the beat with ari melber**weeknights 6pm et [![](https://www.ms.now/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/THE_WEEKNIGHT_THUMB_480x720.png)](https://www.ms.now/the-weeknight) **the weeknight**monday-friday 7pm et [![](https://www.ms.now/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/ALL_IN_THUMB_480x720.png)](https://www.ms.now/all) **all in with chris hayes**tuesday-friday 8pm et [![](https://www.ms.now/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/THE_BRIEFING_THUMB_480x720.png)](https://www.ms.now/jen-psaki) **the briefing with jen psaki**tuesday-friday 9pm et [![](https://www.ms.now/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/LAST_WORD_THUMB_480x720.png)](https://www.ms.now/the-last-word) **the last word with lawrence o’donnell**weeknights 10pm et [![](https://www.ms.now/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/11_HOUR_THUMB_480x720.png)](https://www.ms.now/11th-hour) **the 11th hour with stephanie ruhle**weeknights 11pm et ## More Shows - [Way Too Early with Ali Vitali](https://www.ms.now/way-too-early) - [The Weekend](https://www.ms.now/the-weekend) - [Ana Cabrera Reports](https://www.ms.now/Ana-Cabrera-Reports) - [Velshi](https://www.ms.now/velshi) - [Chris Jansing Reports](https://www.ms.now/chris-jansing-reports) - [Katy Tur Reports](https://www.ms.now/katy-tur-reports) - [Alex Witt Reports](https://www.ms.now/weekends-with-alex) - [PoliticsNation with Al Sharpton](https://www.ms.now/politicsnation) - [The Weekend: Primetime](https://www.ms.now/weekend-primetime) ## MS NOW Tv [Watch Live](https://www.ms.now/live) [Listen Live](https://www.ms.now/msnow/msnow-live-audio-listen-msnow-live-stream-audio-all-day-n1239787) ## More - [MS NOW Live Events](https://www.msnowevents.com/) - [MS NOW Columnists](https://www.ms.now/opinion/columnists) - [TV Schedule](https://www.ms.now/schedule) - [MS NOW Newsletters](https://www.ms.now/newsletters) - [Podcasts](https://www.ms.now/podcasts) - [Transcripts](https://www.ms.now/transcripts) - [MS NOW Insights Community](https://cnbcrsh.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3TUNjdZGhQ6s3ZA?Origin=msnowwebsite) - [Help](https://msnow.zendesk.com/hc/en-us) ## Follow MS NOW - [Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/msnownews/) - [Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/msnownews/) - [X](https://x.com/MSNOWNews) - [Mail](https://www.ms.now/newsletters) ## [Americans deserve relief from the costs of Trumps illegal tariffs — Congress can help](https://www.ms.now/opinion/trump-tariff-illegal-supreme-court) Share this – - [Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook](https://www.ms.now/opinion/trump-tariff-illegal-supreme-court?share=facebook&nb=1) - [Share on X (Opens in new window) X](https://www.ms.now/opinion/trump-tariff-illegal-supreme-court?share=x&nb=1) - [Share on Mail (Opens in new window) Mail](mailto:?subject=%5BShared%20Post%5D%20Americans%20deserve%20relief%20from%20the%20costs%20of%20Trumps%20illegal%20tariffs%20%E2%80%94%20Congress%20can%20help&body=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ms.now%2Fopinion%2Ftrump-tariff-illegal-supreme-court&share=email) - [Share on Print (Opens in new window) Print](https://www.ms.now/opinion/trump-tariff-illegal-supreme-court?share=print&nb=1) - [Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)WhatsApp](https://www.ms.now/opinion/trump-tariff-illegal-supreme-court?share=whatsapp&nb=1) - [Share on Reddit (Opens in new window)Reddit](https://www.ms.now/opinion/trump-tariff-illegal-supreme-court?share=reddit&nb=1) - [Share on Pocket (Opens in new window)Pocket](https://www.ms.now/opinion/trump-tariff-illegal-supreme-court?share=pocket&nb=1) - [Flipboard](https://share.flipboard.com/bookmarklet/popout?v=2&title=Americans%20deserve%20relief%20from%20the%20costs%20of%20Trumps%20illegal%20tariffs%20%E2%80%94%20Congress%20can%20help&url=https://www.ms.now/opinion/trump-tariff-illegal-supreme-court&cid=article_share_flipboard) - [Share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)Pinterest](https://www.ms.now/opinion/trump-tariff-illegal-supreme-court?share=pinterest&nb=1) - [Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)LinkedIn](https://www.ms.now/opinion/trump-tariff-illegal-supreme-court?share=linkedin&nb=1) Opinion # Americans deserve relief from the costs of Trumps illegal tariffs — Congress can help Congress can pass a bipartisan law to help American businesses and taxpayers recover money lost under Trump’s illegal tariff system. 0 of 6 minutes, 24 secondsVolume 0% Press shift question mark to access a list of keyboard shortcuts Keyboard Shortcuts EnabledDisabled Shortcuts Open/Close/ or ? Play/PauseSPACE Increase Volume↑ Decrease Volume↓ Seek Forward→ Seek Backward← Captions On/Offc Fullscreen/Exit Fullscreenf Mute/Unmutem Decrease Caption Size\- Increase Caption Size\+ or = Seek %0-9 Subtitle Settings Off English CC Font Color White Font Opacity 100% Font Size 100% Font Family Arial Character Edge None Edge Color Black Background Color Black Background Opacity 50% Window Color Black Window Opacity 0% Reset White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan 100% 75% 50% 25% 200% 175% 150% 125% 100% 75% 50% Arial Courier Georgia Impact Lucida Console Tahoma Times New Roman Trebuchet MS Verdana None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop Shadow White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan 100% 75% 50% 25% 0% White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan 100% 75% 50% 25% 0% Auto540p (1745 kbps) 1080p (4738 kbps) 720p (3511 kbps) 540p (1745 kbps) 360p (928 kbps) 270p (466 kbps) 270p (263 kbps) Live 00:02 06:22 06:24 [Congressional Republicans give Trump’s tariff lie a standing ovation](https://www.ms.now/ms-now/watch/trump-touts-his-use-of-tariffs-denounces-unfortunate-supreme-court-ruling-2489046083555) February 24, 2026 / 02:48 Mar. 1, 2026, 6:00 AM EST By Ray Brescia Looking back to Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign promises, two currently stand out: He was going to release the Jeffrey Epstein files and he pledged to impose sweeping tariffs. When he didn’t make good on the first vow, [several members of the president’s party](https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2026/02/17/thomas-massie-epstein-files-trump-bondi-interview-00781625) in Congress bucked him to help pass the bipartisan [Epstein Files Transparency Act](https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/4405). When President Trump fulfilled his second promise regarding tariffs, the Supreme Court [found them illegal](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1287_4gcj.pdf), but failed to create a clear remedy for the thousands of American businesses that paid [roughly \$175 billion in tariff revenue](https://www.reuters.com/world/us-tariff-revenue-risk-supreme-court-ruling-tops-175-billion-penn-wharton-2026-02-20/) collected under that illegal system. Could a bipartisan coalition in Congress emerge once again to right an egregious wrong? Perhaps it’s time for a “Tariff Transparency and Reparations Act.” Play ![](https://www.ms.now/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/1772069135472_n_weeknight_sen_ed_markey_260225_1920x1080.jpg?w=860&h=484&crop=1) [‘Main Street into pain street’: Sen. Ed Markey slams Trump’s tariffs for squeezing everyday Americans](https://www.ms.now/ms-now/watch/trump-touts-his-use-of-tariffs-denounces-unfortunate-supreme-court-ruling-2489046083555) February 24, 2026 / 02:48 In the face of Trump administration intransigence around releasing the Epstein files, Congress passed legislation to force it to do so. Due to that effort, the Justice Department released millions of files. The Epstein files have been an albatross for the administration for months. When the public pressure to release the files became overwhelming, and the administration’s position utterly indefensible, the president succumbed to that pressure — only when it appeared there was no viable path to continue resisting congressional action. Similarly, there is nothing the administration can do to hold onto the money collected through those illegal tariffs, other than to fight a similarly indefensible and illegitimate rear-guard action through the courts. And that is exactly what the administration appears poised to do. Speaking last week before the Economic Club of Dallas, Treasury Secretary [Scott Bessent expressed](https://fortune.com/2026/02/23/scott-bessent-tariff-supreme-court-ruling-refunds/) his “sense” that payment of the revenue from the tariffs “could be dragged out for weeks, months, years.” He would add, “I got a feeling the American people won’t see it.” Trump has echoed these sentiments: [“We’ll end up being in court for the next five years.”](https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/tariff-refunds-supreme-court-trump-rcna259968) > Congress can move, and move quickly, to make American businesses and taxpayers whole. In other words, Trump is treating this \$175 billion like a bad debt on one of his failed real estate ventures: You can take him to court, but he’ll fight having to pay a penny tooth and nail. What makes this fight different, however, is now he has the full weight and power of the Justice Department behind him, doing his bidding at public expense. ### More from MS NOW Daily Must reads from Today's list [![Catherine Hanaway participates in a forum on Jul 26, 2016 in Jefferson City, Mo.](https://www.ms.now/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/260209-catherine-hanaway-zz.jpg?w=80&h=80&crop=1)](https://www.ms.now/opinion/missouris-failed-dei-suit-vs-starbucks-offers-lessons-to-big-business) ### [Missouri’s failed DEI suit vs. Starbucks offers lessons to Big Business](https://www.ms.now/opinion/missouris-failed-dei-suit-vs-starbucks-offers-lessons-to-big-business) [Ja’han Jones](https://www.ms.now/author/jahan-jones "Posts by Ja'han Jones") [![Rep. Byron Donalds.](https://www.ms.now/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/251229-byron-donalds-es.jpg?w=80&h=80&crop=1)](https://www.ms.now/opinion/byron-donalds-faces-racist-attacks-in-floridas-ugly-gop-gubernatorial-primary) ### [Byron Donalds faces racist attacks in Florida’s ugly GOP gubernatorial primary](https://www.ms.now/opinion/byron-donalds-faces-racist-attacks-in-floridas-ugly-gop-gubernatorial-primary) [Ja’han Jones](https://www.ms.now/author/jahan-jones "Posts by Ja'han Jones") But the administration shouldn’t have the last word on the subject. And Congress shouldn’t sit idly by while the administration treats this money like its own, forcing businesses and taxpayers to go through the trouble and expense of having to claw back what is rightfully theirs. Just as in the case of the Epstein files, a bipartisan coalition should agree that when Americans have been victimized by lawless action — here, businesses and taxpayers who forked over billions in illegal tariffs — the administration should not stand in the way of real relief for those victims. This harm certainly pales in comparison to the damage done to the survivors at the hands of the Epstein class. Here though, it is difficult to obscure, obfuscate or ignore the perpetrator and the victims: The administration imposed lawless tariffs, and the rule of law requires it to return the fees collected to those who paid them. On Monday, a group of Democratic senators released a bill that [takes steps in this direction](https://apnews.com/article/trump-tariffs-refunds-senate-democrats-supreme-court-c2fc0ed663858a90bd2ddabf60aeda56), but it leaves the details to the administration. In the case of the Epstein files, we see where that has led us, with the administration continuing to drag its feet when it comes to releasing the files, even when ordered to do so by Congress. Play ![](https://www.ms.now/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/1771987914265_n_msnow_trump_tariffs_260224_1920x1080.jpg?w=860&h=484&crop=1) [Trump touts his use of tariffs, denounces ‘unfortunate’ Supreme Court ruling](https://www.ms.now/ms-now/watch/trump-touts-his-use-of-tariffs-denounces-unfortunate-supreme-court-ruling-2489046083555) February 24, 2026 / 02:48 Instead of relying on the administration to reimburse Americans fairly and expeditiously, Congress can create an independent fund capitalized by the billions taken in as illegal tariffs. A special master can then assess these claims. When the claimant can show that they did not simply pass the costs on to their customers, they can receive a refund. If the company did not absorb the costs of the tariffs, that money could stay in the fund and serve as the basis of a rebate to taxpayers. Congress does this sort of thing with some frequency, as in the wake of the terrorist attacks on [Sept. 11, 2001](https://www.vcf.gov/), for thoseexposed to the toxic chemicals at the [Camp Lejeune military base](https://www.navy.mil/clja/), and those harmed in the Deepwater Horizon disaster through the [Gulf Coast Restoration Trust Fund](https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-markets-financial-institutions-and-fiscal-service/restore-act). While such interventions typically follow a national disaster, here, the disaster for the economy was the president’s illegal tariffs. And the federal government is literally holding the bag. With the illegal tariffs the administration collected, Congress can move, and move quickly, to make American businesses and taxpayers whole, and can do so without taking it on faith that the administration will follow the law. ![](https://www.ms.now/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/MSNOW-grayscale-1.svg) Ray Brescia Ray Brescia is a professor of law at Albany Law School and author of the book “The Private Is Political: Identity and Democracy in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism.” ![MS NOW](https://www.ms.now/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/MS_NOW_ICON_WHITE-3-1-1.png?w=1000;w=1000;w=1000;w=1000;w=900) - [About](https://www.ms.now/msnow/msnbccom-digital-contacts-rcna53317) - [Contact](https://www.ms.now/information/msnbc-info/contact-us-n1301857) - [help](https://msnow.zendesk.com/hc/en-us) - [Careers](https://careers.versantmedia.com/) - [AD Choices](https://www.versantprivacy.com/privacy/cookies#accordionheader3) - [Privacy Policy](https://versantprivacy.com/privacy/?intake=MSNOW) - [Your privacy choices](https://www.ms.now/opinion/trump-tariff-illegal-supreme-court) - [CA Notice](https://versantprivacy.com/privacy/california-consumer-privacy-act/?intake=MSNOW) - [Terms of Service](https://versantmedia.com/terms/) - [MS NOW Sitemap](https://www.ms.now/archive) - [Closed Captioning](https://www.ms.now/closed-captioning-n1241553) - [Advertise](https://together.nbcuni.com/advertise/?utm_source=msnow&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=property_ad_pages) - [Join the MS NOW insights Community](https://cnbcrsh.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3TUNjdZGhQ6s3ZA?Origin=msnowwebsite) © 2026 Versant Media, LLC ![](https://www.ms.now/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/MS_NOW_PRIMARY_LOGO_WHITE_RGB-2-1.png?w=1024;w=1024;w=1024;w=1024;w=900) [search by queryly](https://www.queryly.com/) [Advanced Search]() ![close](https://www.queryly.com/images/whitecloseicon.png) # Search results Filters Show filters Sort by: Relevance • Newest • Oldest ## No results found ## Filter options Close Search [Search powered by Jetpack](https://jetpack.com/upgrade/search/?utm_source=poweredby)
Readable Markdown
Mar. 1, 2026, 6:00 AM EST By Ray Brescia Looking back to Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign promises, two currently stand out: He was going to release the Jeffrey Epstein files and he pledged to impose sweeping tariffs. When he didn’t make good on the first vow, [several members of the president’s party](https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2026/02/17/thomas-massie-epstein-files-trump-bondi-interview-00781625) in Congress bucked him to help pass the bipartisan [Epstein Files Transparency Act](https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/4405). When President Trump fulfilled his second promise regarding tariffs, the Supreme Court [found them illegal](https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-1287_4gcj.pdf), but failed to create a clear remedy for the thousands of American businesses that paid [roughly \$175 billion in tariff revenue](https://www.reuters.com/world/us-tariff-revenue-risk-supreme-court-ruling-tops-175-billion-penn-wharton-2026-02-20/) collected under that illegal system. Could a bipartisan coalition in Congress emerge once again to right an egregious wrong? Perhaps it’s time for a “Tariff Transparency and Reparations Act.” ![](https://www.ms.now/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/1772069135472_n_weeknight_sen_ed_markey_260225_1920x1080.jpg?w=860&h=484&crop=1) In the face of Trump administration intransigence around releasing the Epstein files, Congress passed legislation to force it to do so. Due to that effort, the Justice Department released millions of files. The Epstein files have been an albatross for the administration for months. When the public pressure to release the files became overwhelming, and the administration’s position utterly indefensible, the president succumbed to that pressure — only when it appeared there was no viable path to continue resisting congressional action. Similarly, there is nothing the administration can do to hold onto the money collected through those illegal tariffs, other than to fight a similarly indefensible and illegitimate rear-guard action through the courts. And that is exactly what the administration appears poised to do. Speaking last week before the Economic Club of Dallas, Treasury Secretary [Scott Bessent expressed](https://fortune.com/2026/02/23/scott-bessent-tariff-supreme-court-ruling-refunds/) his “sense” that payment of the revenue from the tariffs “could be dragged out for weeks, months, years.” He would add, “I got a feeling the American people won’t see it.” Trump has echoed these sentiments: [“We’ll end up being in court for the next five years.”](https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/tariff-refunds-supreme-court-trump-rcna259968) > Congress can move, and move quickly, to make American businesses and taxpayers whole. In other words, Trump is treating this \$175 billion like a bad debt on one of his failed real estate ventures: You can take him to court, but he’ll fight having to pay a penny tooth and nail. What makes this fight different, however, is now he has the full weight and power of the Justice Department behind him, doing his bidding at public expense. But the administration shouldn’t have the last word on the subject. And Congress shouldn’t sit idly by while the administration treats this money like its own, forcing businesses and taxpayers to go through the trouble and expense of having to claw back what is rightfully theirs. Just as in the case of the Epstein files, a bipartisan coalition should agree that when Americans have been victimized by lawless action — here, businesses and taxpayers who forked over billions in illegal tariffs — the administration should not stand in the way of real relief for those victims. This harm certainly pales in comparison to the damage done to the survivors at the hands of the Epstein class. Here though, it is difficult to obscure, obfuscate or ignore the perpetrator and the victims: The administration imposed lawless tariffs, and the rule of law requires it to return the fees collected to those who paid them. On Monday, a group of Democratic senators released a bill that [takes steps in this direction](https://apnews.com/article/trump-tariffs-refunds-senate-democrats-supreme-court-c2fc0ed663858a90bd2ddabf60aeda56), but it leaves the details to the administration. In the case of the Epstein files, we see where that has led us, with the administration continuing to drag its feet when it comes to releasing the files, even when ordered to do so by Congress. ![](https://www.ms.now/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/1771987914265_n_msnow_trump_tariffs_260224_1920x1080.jpg?w=860&h=484&crop=1) Instead of relying on the administration to reimburse Americans fairly and expeditiously, Congress can create an independent fund capitalized by the billions taken in as illegal tariffs. A special master can then assess these claims. When the claimant can show that they did not simply pass the costs on to their customers, they can receive a refund. If the company did not absorb the costs of the tariffs, that money could stay in the fund and serve as the basis of a rebate to taxpayers. Congress does this sort of thing with some frequency, as in the wake of the terrorist attacks on [Sept. 11, 2001](https://www.vcf.gov/), for thoseexposed to the toxic chemicals at the [Camp Lejeune military base](https://www.navy.mil/clja/), and those harmed in the Deepwater Horizon disaster through the [Gulf Coast Restoration Trust Fund](https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/financial-markets-financial-institutions-and-fiscal-service/restore-act). While such interventions typically follow a national disaster, here, the disaster for the economy was the president’s illegal tariffs. And the federal government is literally holding the bag. With the illegal tariffs the administration collected, Congress can move, and move quickly, to make American businesses and taxpayers whole, and can do so without taking it on faith that the administration will follow the law. ![](https://www.ms.now/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/MSNOW-grayscale-1.svg) Ray Brescia Ray Brescia is a professor of law at Albany Law School and author of the book “The Private Is Political: Identity and Democracy in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism.”
ML Classification
ML Categories
/Law_and_Government
90.4%
/Law_and_Government/Legal
85.0%
/Law_and_Government/Legal/Business_and_Corporate_Law
55.5%
/Finance
46.6%
/Finance/Financial_Planning_and_Management
30.1%
/Finance/Financial_Planning_and_Management/Asset_and_Portfolio_Management
16.3%
Raw JSON
{
    "/Law_and_Government": 904,
    "/Law_and_Government/Legal": 850,
    "/Law_and_Government/Legal/Business_and_Corporate_Law": 555,
    "/Finance": 466,
    "/Finance/Financial_Planning_and_Management": 301,
    "/Finance/Financial_Planning_and_Management/Asset_and_Portfolio_Management": 163
}
ML Page Types
/Article
99.6%
/Article/News_Update
74.8%
Raw JSON
{
    "/Article": 996,
    "/Article/News_Update": 748
}
ML Intent Types
Informational
98.0%
Raw JSON
{
    "Informational": 980
}
Content Metadata
Languageen-us
AuthorAnthony L. Fisher
Publish Time2026-03-01 06:00:00 (1 month ago)
Original Publish Time2026-03-01 06:00:00 (1 month ago)
RepublishedNo
Word Count (Total)1,486
Word Count (Content)842
Links
External Links38
Internal Links48
Technical SEO
Meta NofollowNo
Meta NoarchiveNo
JS RenderedYes
Redirect Targetnull
Performance
Download Time (ms)645
TTFB (ms)641
Download Size (bytes)46,590
Shard104 (laksa)
Root Hash15459566131319385504
Unparsed URLnow,ms!www,/opinion/trump-tariff-illegal-supreme-court s443