🕷️ Crawler Inspector

URL Lookup

Direct Parameter Lookup

Raw Queries and Responses

1. Shard Calculation

Query:
Response:
Calculated Shard: 31 (from laksa066)

2. Crawled Status Check

Query:
Response:

3. Robots.txt Check

Query:
Response:

4. Spam/Ban Check

Query:
Response:

5. Seen Status Check

ℹ️ Skipped - page is already crawled

📍
LOCATION
Host 31 · Partition 55
laksa031
11974975279136771031
đź“„
INDEXABLE
âś…
CRAWLED
1 month ago
🤖
ROBOTS ALLOWED

Page Info Filters

FilterStatusConditionDetails
HTTP statusPASSdownload_http_code = 200HTTP 200
Age cutoffPASSdownload_stamp > now() - 6 MONTH1.7 months ago
History dropPASSisNull(history_drop_reason)No drop reason
Spam/banPASSfh_dont_index != 1 AND ml_spam_score = 0ml_spam_score=0
CanonicalPASSmeta_canonical IS NULL OR = '' OR = src_unparsedNot set

Page Details

PropertyValue
URLhttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/16/3493
Last Crawled2026-04-12 10:26:34 (1 month ago)
First Indexed2021-08-08 07:14:20 (4 years ago)
HTTP Status Code200
Content
Meta TitleDiagnostic Accuracy of Rapid Antigen Test Kits for Detecting SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 17,171 Suspected COVID-19 Patients
Meta DescriptionEarly diagnosis is still as crucial as the initial stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. As RT-PCR sometimes is not feasible in developing nations or rural areas, health professionals may use a rapid antigen test (RAT) to lessen the load of diagnosis. However, the efficacy of RAT is yet to be investigated thoroughly. Hence, we tried to evaluate the overall performance of RAT in SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Based on our PROSPERO registered protocol (CRD42021231432), we searched online databases (i.e., PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science) and analysed overall pooled specificity and sensitivity of RAT along with study quality, publication bias, heterogeneity and more. The overall pooled specificity and sensitivity of RAT were detected as 99.4% (95% CI: 99.1–99.8; I2 = 90%) and 68.4% (95% CI: 60.8–75.9; I2 = 98%), respectively. In subgroup analyses, nasopharyngeal specimens and symptomatic patient’s samples were more sensitive in RAT, while cycle threshold (Ct) values were found to have an inverse relationship with sensitivity. In the European and American populations, RAT showed better performance. Although the sensitivity of RAT is yet to be improved, it could still be an alternative in places with poor laboratory set up. Nevertheless, the negative samples of RAT can be re-tested using RT-PCR to reduce false negative results.
Meta Canonicalnull
Boilerpipe Text
heavy column, fetched on demand
Markdown
heavy column, fetched on demand
Readable Markdown
heavy column, fetched on demand
ML Classification
ML Categories
/Health
96.0%
/Health/Medical_Devices_and_Equipment
39.2%
/Science
24.8%
/Science/Biological_Sciences
24.3%
/Science/Biological_Sciences/Other
20.1%
Raw JSON
{
    "/Health": 960,
    "/Health/Medical_Devices_and_Equipment": 392,
    "/Science": 248,
    "/Science/Biological_Sciences": 243,
    "/Science/Biological_Sciences/Other": 201
}
ML Page Types
/Article
99.4%
/Article/Study_or_Research_Findings
98.9%
Raw JSON
{
    "/Article": 994,
    "/Article/Study_or_Research_Findings": 989
}
ML Intent Types
Informational
99.9%
Raw JSON
{
    "Informational": 999
}
Content Metadata
Languageen
Authornull
Publish Timenot set
Original Publish Time2021-08-08 07:14:20 (4 years ago)
RepublishedNo
Word Count (Total)13,108
Word Count (Content)8,705
Links
External Links241
Internal Links87
Technical SEO
Meta NofollowNo
Meta NoarchiveNo
JS RenderedYes
Redirect Targetnull
Performance
Download Time (ms)568
TTFB (ms)537
Download Size (bytes)84,854
Location
Host ID31 (laksa031)
Partition ID55
Root Hash11974975279136771031
Unparsed URLcom,mdpi!www,/2077-0383/10/16/3493 s443