ℹ️ Skipped - page is already crawled
| Filter | Status | Condition | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| HTTP status | PASS | download_http_code = 200 | HTTP 200 |
| Age cutoff | PASS | download_stamp > now() - 6 MONTH | 0.1 months ago |
| History drop | PASS | isNull(history_drop_reason) | No drop reason |
| Spam/ban | PASS | fh_dont_index != 1 AND ml_spam_score = 0 | ml_spam_score=0 |
| Canonical | PASS | meta_canonical IS NULL OR = '' OR = src_unparsed | Not set |
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| URL | https://www.livescience.com/63204-string-theory-multiverse.html |
| Last Crawled | 2026-04-03 15:11:45 (3 days ago) |
| First Indexed | 2018-07-31 06:34:58 (7 years ago) |
| HTTP Status Code | 200 |
| Meta Title | String Theory May Create Far Fewer Universes Than Thought | Live Science |
| Meta Description | Some physicists claim the popular landscape of universes in string theory may not exist. |
| Meta Canonical | null |
| Boilerpipe Text | (Image credit: Shutterstock/Juergen Faelchle)
The problem with string theory, according to some physicists, is that it makes too many universes. It predicts not one but some 10
500
versions of spacetime, each with their own laws of physics. But with so many universes on the table, how can the theory explain why ours has the features it does?
Now some theorists suggest most—if not all—of those universes are actually forbidden, at least if we want them to have stable dark energy, the supposed force accelerating the expansion of the cosmos. To some, eliminating so many possible universes is not a drawback but a major step forward for string theory, offering new hope of making testable predictions. But others say the multiverse is here to stay, and the proposed problem with all those universes is not a problem at all.
The debate was a hot topic at the end of June in Japan, where string theorists convened for the conference Strings 2018. "This is really something new and it's led to a controversy within the field," says Ulf Danielsson, a physicist at Uppsala University in Sweden. The conversation centers on a
pair
of
papers
posted on the preprint server arXiv last month taking aim at the so-called
“landscape” of string theory
—the incomprehensible number of potential universes that result from the many different solutions to string theory's equations that produce the ingredients of our own cosmos, including dark energy. But the vast majority of the solutions found so far are mathematically inconsistent, the papers contend, putting them not in the landscape but in the so-called "swampland" of universes that cannot actually exist. Scientists have known many solutions must fall in this swampland for years, but the idea that most, or maybe all, of the landscape solutions might live there would be a major change. In fact, it may be theoretically impossible to find a valid solution to string theory that includes stable dark energy, says Cumrun Vafa, a Harvard University physicist who led the work on the two papers.
Article continues below
Latest Videos From Live Science
Lost in the MultiverseÂ
String theory is an attempt to describe the whole universe under a single "theory of everything" by adding extra dimensions of spacetime and thinking of particles as miniscule vibrating loops. Many string theorists contend it is still the most promising direction for pursuing Albert Einstein's dream of uniting his general theory of relativity with the conflicting microscopic world of quantum mechanics. Yet the notion of a string theory landscape that predicts not just one universe but many has put some physicists off. "If it's really the landscape, in my view it's death for the theory because it loses all predictive value," says Princeton University physicist Paul Steinhardt, who collaborated on one of the recent papers. "Literally anything is possible." To Steinhardt and others, the newfound problems with dark energy offer string theory a way out. "This picture with a big multiverse could be mathematically wrong," Danielsson says. "Paradoxically this makes things much more interesting because that means string theory is much more predictive than we thought it was."
Some string theorists such as Savdeep Sethi of the University of Chicago welcome the reevaluation that is happening now. "I think this is exciting," he says. "I've been a skeptic of the landscape for a long time. I'm really happy to see the paradigm shift away from this belief that we have this proven set of solutions." But not everyone buys the argument that the landscape actually belongs in the swampland—especially the research team that established one of the earliest versions of the landscape in the first place back in 2003, which goes by the acronym
KKLT
after the scientists' last names. "I think it's very healthy to make these conjectures and check what other things could be going on but I don't see either theoretical or experimental reasons to take such a conjecture very seriously," says KKLT member Shamit Kachru of Stanford University. And Eva Silverstein, a Stanford physicist who also helped build the early landscape models, likewise doubts Vafa and his colleagues' argument. "I think the ingredients KKLT use and the way they put them together is perfectly valid," she says. Juan Maldacena, a theorist at the Institute for Advanced Study, says he also still supports the idea of string theory universes with stable dark energy.
And many theorists are perfectly happy with the string theory multiverse. "It is true that if this landscape picture is correct, the bit of the universe we're in compared to the multiverse will be like our
solar system
within the universe," Kachru says. And that is a good thing, he adds. Johannes Kepler originally sought a fundamental reason for why Earth lies the distance it does from the sun. But now we know the sun is just one of billions of stars in the galaxy, each with its own planets, and the Earth–sun distance is simply a random number rather than a result of some deep mathematical principle. Likewise, if the universe is one of trillions within the multiverse, the particular parameters of our cosmos are similarly random. The fact these numbers seem perfectly fine-tuned to create a habitable universe is a selection effect—humans will of course find themselves in one of the rare corners of the multiverse where it is possible for them to have evolved.
The Accelerating Universe
If it is true string theory cannot accommodate stable dark energy, that may be a reason to doubt string theory. But to Vafa it is a reason to doubt dark energy—that is, dark energy in its most popular form, called a cosmological constant. The idea originated in 1917 with Einstein and was revived in 1998 when astronomers discovered that not only is spacetime expanding—the rate of that expansion is picking up. The cosmological constant would be a form of energy in the vacuum of space that never changes and counteracts the inward pull of gravity. But it is not the only possible explanation for the accelerating universe. An alternative is "quintessence," a field pervading spacetime that can evolve. "Regardless of whether one can realize a stable dark energy in string theory or not, it turns out that the idea of having dark energy changing over time is actually more natural in string theory," Vafa says. "If this is the case, then one can measure this sliding of dark energy by astrophysical observations currently taking place."
Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.
So far all astrophysical evidence supports the cosmological constant idea, but there is some wiggle room in the measurements. Upcoming experiments such as Europe's Euclid space telescope,
NASA
's Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST) and the Simons Observatory being built in Chile's desert will look for signs dark energy was stronger or weaker in the past than the present. "The interesting thing is that we're already at a sensitivity level to begin to put pressure on [the cosmological constant theory]." Steinhardt says. "We don't have to wait for new technology to be in the game. We're in the game now." And even skeptics of Vafa's proposal support the idea of considering alternatives to the cosmological constant. "I actually agree that [a changing dark energy field] is a simplifying method for constructing accelerated expansion," Silverstein says. "But I don't think there's any justification for making observational predictions about the dark energy at this point."
Quintessence is not the only other option. In the wake of Vafa's papers, Danielsson and colleagues proposed
another way of fitting dark energy into string theory
. In their vision our universe is the three-dimensional surface of a bubble expanding within a larger-dimensional space. "The physics within this surface can mimic the physics of a cosmological constant," Danielsson says. "This is a different way of realizing dark energy compared to what we've been thinking so far."
A Beautiful Theory
Ultimately the debate going on in string theory centers on a deep question: What is the point of physics? Should a good theory be able to explain the particular characteristics of the universe around us or is that asking too much? And when a theory conflicts with the way we think our universe works, do we abandon the theory or the things we think we know?
String theory is incredibly appealing to many scientists because it is "beautiful"—its equations are satisfying and its proposed explanations elegant. But so far it lacks any experimental evidence supporting it—and even worse, any reasonable prospects for gathering such evidence. Yet even the suggestion string theory may not be able to accommodate the kind of dark energy we see in the cosmos around us does not dissuade some. "String theory is so rich and beautiful and so correct in almost all the things that it's taught us that it's hard to believe that the mistake is in string theory and not in us," Sethi says. But perhaps chasing after beauty is not a good way to find the right theory of the universe. "Mathematics is full of amazing and beautiful things, and most of them do not describe the world," physicist Sabine Hossenfelder of the Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies wrote in her recent book,
Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray
(Basic Books, 2018).
Despite the divergence of opinions, physicists are a friendly bunch, and are united by their common goal of understanding the universe. Kachru, one of the founders of the landscape idea, worked with Vafa, the landscape's critic, as his undergraduate advisor—and the two are still friends. "He asked me once if I'd bet my life these [landscape solutions] exist," Kachru says. "My answer was, 'I wouldn't bet my life but I'd bet his!'"
Additional reporting by Lee Billings.
This story was provided by
Astrobiology Magazine
, a web-based publication sponsored by the NASA
astrobiology program
.
Clara has a bachelor's degree in astronomy and physics from Wesleyan University, and a graduate certificate in science writing from the University of California, Santa Cruz. She has written for both Space.com and Live Science. |
| Markdown | 
[Skip to main content](https://www.livescience.com/63204-string-theory-multiverse.html#main)
Live Science Plus
\- Join our community
JOIN NOW
10
Member Features
24/7
Access Available
25K+
Active Members
Exclusive Newsletters
Science news direct to your inbox
Member Competitions
Win exclusive prizes
Exclusive Content
Premium articles & videos
Early Access
First to see new features
Private Forums
Connect with members
Monthly Rewards
Surprise gifts & perks
GET LIVE SCIENCE PLUS
It's quick and easy to access Live Science Plus, simply enter your email below. We'll send you a confirmation and sign you up for our daily newsletter, keeping you up to date with the latest science news.
By submitting your information you agree to the [Terms & Conditions](https://futureplc.com/future-member-terms-and-conditions/) and [Privacy Policy](https://futureplc.com/privacy-policy/) and are aged 16 or over.
FIND OUT ABOUT OUR MAGAZINE
Want to subscribe to the magazine? Click the button below to find out more information.
[Find out more](https://www.livescience.com/63204-string-theory-multiverse.html)
Welcome to Live Science Plus \!
Hi ,
Your membership journey starts here.
Keep exploring and earning more as a member.
[MY ACCOUNT](https://www.livescience.com/my-account)
***
Earn your first badge
Complete 1 quiz to unlock your first badge.
Keep earning badges
Explore ways to get more involved as a member.
Live Science Quizzes
Quick, fun science challenges.
[Play Now](https://www.livescience.com/quizzes)
Science Crosswords
Short, brain-teasing puzzles.
[Play Now](https://www.livescience.com/tag/science-crossword)
***
See what you’ve unlocked.
Explore your membership benefits.
[Explore](https://www.livescience.com/membership)
Member Exclusives
Science Newsletters
Select the newsletters you'd like to receive and enter your email below.
[View all](https://www.livescience.com/newsletter)
***
[Sign Out]()
Open menu
Close main menu
[ Live Science](https://www.livescience.com/)
[Sign up to our newsletter Newsletter](https://www.livescience.com/newsletter)
[RSS](https://www.livescience.com/feeds.xml)
Sign in
- View Profile
- Sign out
Search
- [Space](https://www.livescience.com/space)
- [Health](https://www.livescience.com/health)
- [Planet Earth](https://www.livescience.com/planet-earth)
- [Animals](https://www.livescience.com/animals)
- [Archaeology](https://www.livescience.com/archaeology)
- [Physics & Math](https://www.livescience.com/physics-mathematics)
- [Technology](https://www.livescience.com/technology)
- More
- [Human Behavior](https://www.livescience.com/human-behavior)
- [Chemistry](https://www.livescience.com/chemistry)
- [Science news](https://www.livescience.com/news)
- [Opinion](https://www.livescience.com/opinion)
- [Life's Little Mysteries](https://www.livescience.com/tag/lifes-little-mysteries)
- [Science quizzes](https://www.livescience.com/quizzes)
- [Crossword](https://www.livescience.com/human-behavior/arts-entertainment/live-science-crossword-puzzle)
- [About us](https://www.livescience.com/about-live-science)
- [Newsletters](https://www.livescience.com/newsletter)
- [Follow us](https://www.livescience.com/technology/internet/follow-live-science-on-social-media)
- [Story archive](https://www.livescience.com/archive)
Don't miss these
[ Cosmology Our leading theory of dark matter may be wrong, huge new gravity study hints](https://www.livescience.com/physics-mathematics/dark-matter/new-study-favors-fuzzy-dark-matter-as-the-backbone-of-the-universe-contrary-to-decades-of-research "Our leading theory of dark matter may be wrong, huge new gravity study hints")
[ Physics & Mathematics 'Collective hum' of black holes could settle the debate over new physics](https://www.livescience.com/physics-mathematics/collective-hum-of-black-holes-could-mend-our-broken-understanding-of-the-universe-physicists-say "'Collective hum' of black holes could settle the debate over new physics")
[ Cosmology Our model of the universe is deeply flawed — unless space is actually a 'sticky' fluid](https://www.livescience.com/physics-mathematics/dark-energy/our-model-of-the-universe-is-deeply-flawed-unless-space-is-actually-a-sticky-fluid-new-research-hints "Our model of the universe is deeply flawed — unless space is actually a 'sticky' fluid")
[ Black Holes Exotic prime numbers could be hiding inside black holes](https://www.livescience.com/space/black-holes/exotic-prime-numbers-could-be-hiding-inside-black-holes "Exotic prime numbers could be hiding inside black holes")
[ Particle Physics Dark matter and neutrinos may interact, hinting at 'fundamental breakthrough' in particle physics](https://www.livescience.com/physics-mathematics/particle-physics/scientists-may-be-approaching-a-fundamental-breakthrough-in-cosmology-and-particle-physics-if-dark-matter-and-ghost-particles-can-interact "Dark matter and neutrinos may interact, hinting at 'fundamental breakthrough' in particle physics")
[ Cosmology Standard model of cosmology holds up in massive 6-year study of the universe](https://www.livescience.com/physics-mathematics/dark-energy/the-dream-has-come-true-standard-model-of-cosmology-holds-up-in-massive-6-year-study-of-the-universe-with-one-big-caveat "Standard model of cosmology holds up in massive 6-year study of the universe")
[ Black Holes Some objects we thought were planets may actually be tiny black holes from the dawn of time](https://www.livescience.com/space/black-holes/some-objects-we-thought-were-planets-may-actually-be-tiny-black-holes-from-the-dawn-of-time "Some objects we thought were planets may actually be tiny black holes from the dawn of time")
[ Particle Physics Physicists recreated the first millisecond after the Big Bang — and found it was surprisingly soupy](https://www.livescience.com/physics-mathematics/particle-physics/physicists-recreated-the-first-millisecond-after-the-big-bang-and-found-it-was-surprisingly-soupy "Physicists recreated the first millisecond after the Big Bang — and found it was surprisingly soupy")
[ Black Holes 'A real revolution': The James Webb telescope is upending our understanding of the biggest, oldest black holes in the universe](https://www.livescience.com/space/black-holes/a-real-revolution-the-james-webb-telescope-is-upending-our-understanding-of-the-biggest-oldest-black-holes-in-the-universe "'A real revolution': The James Webb telescope is upending our understanding of the biggest, oldest black holes in the universe")
[ Astronomy Mysterious 'dots' discovered by Webb telescope may be the first stars in the universe on the verge of collapse](https://www.livescience.com/space/astronomy/mysterious-little-red-dots-discovered-by-james-webb-telescope-may-be-the-first-stars-in-the-universe-on-the-verge-of-collapse "Mysterious 'dots' discovered by Webb telescope may be the first stars in the universe on the verge of collapse")
[ Cosmology Every major galaxy is speeding away from us, except one — and we finally know why](https://www.livescience.com/space/cosmology/every-major-galaxy-is-speeding-away-from-the-milky-way-except-one-and-we-finally-know-why "Every major galaxy is speeding away from us, except one — and we finally know why")
[ Black Holes Impossibly powerful 'ghost particle' that hit Earth may have come from an exploding black hole](https://www.livescience.com/space/black-holes/impossibly-powerful-ghost-particle-that-slammed-into-earth-may-have-come-from-an-exploding-black-hole-and-it-could-upend-both-particle-physics-and-cosmology "Impossibly powerful 'ghost particle' that hit Earth may have come from an exploding black hole ")
[ Black Holes Universe-shaking collision of black hole and neutron star could upend our understanding of monster cosmic mergers](https://www.livescience.com/space/black-holes/universe-shaking-collision-of-black-hole-and-neutron-star-could-upend-our-understanding-of-monster-cosmic-mergers "Universe-shaking collision of black hole and neutron star could upend our understanding of monster cosmic mergers")
[ Black Holes 'Runaway' black hole detected by the James Webb telescope adds a strange new chapter to our universe's story](https://www.livescience.com/space/black-holes/runaway-black-hole-detected-by-the-james-webb-telescope-adds-a-strange-new-chapter-to-our-universes-story "'Runaway' black hole detected by the James Webb telescope adds a strange new chapter to our universe's story")
[ Black Holes The earliest black holes in the universe may still be with us, surprising study claims](https://www.livescience.com/space/black-holes/the-earliest-black-holes-in-the-universe-may-still-be-with-us-surprising-study-claims "The earliest black holes in the universe may still be with us, surprising study claims")
Trending
- [Live Science Today](https://www.livescience.com/live-science-today-jensen-huang-agi-claim-and-major-leap-to-reanimation-after-death)
- [Fingernail to touchscreen stylus](https://www.livescience.com/chemistry/chemistry-student-develops-clear-polish-that-turns-your-fingernail-into-a-touch-screen-stylus)
- [How adaptability is our superpower](https://www.livescience.com/archaeology/human-evolution/thats-why-theres-9-billion-of-us-and-not-9-billion-of-some-other-primate-why-our-ability-to-adapt-is-humanitys-superpower)
- [Arctic air blast](https://www.livescience.com/planet-earth/rivers-oceans/extreme-blast-of-arctic-air-from-polar-vortex-paints-a-picturesque-plume-off-florida-coast-earth-from-space)
- [Russian rocket glitch](https://www.livescience.com/space/space-exploration/russian-rocket-en-route-to-iss-suffers-major-antenna-glitch-triggering-remote-control-astronaut-backup-plan)
1. [Space](https://www.livescience.com/space)
2. [Astronomy](https://www.livescience.com/space/astronomy)
# String Theory May Create Far Fewer Universes Than Thought
[News](https://www.livescience.com/news)
By [Clara Moskowitz](https://www.livescience.com/author/clara-moskowitz)
published
July 30, 2018
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. [Here’s how it works](https://www.livescience.com/about-live-science#section-affiliate-advertising-disclosure).
(Image credit: Shutterstock/Juergen Faelchle)
Share
- Copy link
- [Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.livescience.com%2F63204-string-theory-multiverse.html)
- [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=String+Theory+May+Create+Far+Fewer+Universes+Than+Thought&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.livescience.com%2F63204-string-theory-multiverse.html)
- [Whatsapp](whatsapp://send?text=String+Theory+May+Create+Far+Fewer+Universes+Than+Thought+https%3A%2F%2Fwww.livescience.com%2F63204-string-theory-multiverse.html?fwa)
- [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.livescience.com%2F63204-string-theory-multiverse.html&title=String+Theory+May+Create+Far+Fewer+Universes+Than+Thought)
- [Pinterest](https://pinterest.com/pin/create/button/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.livescience.com%2F63204-string-theory-multiverse.html&media=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net%2FCHAD6Kur3Tup8xFzKRxxwJ.jpg)
- [Flipboard](https://share.flipboard.com/bookmarklet/popout?title=String+Theory+May+Create+Far+Fewer+Universes+Than+Thought&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.livescience.com%2F63204-string-theory-multiverse.html)
- [Email](mailto:?subject=I%20found%20this%20webpage&body=Hi,%20I%20found%20this%20webpage%20and%20thought%20you%20might%20like%20it%20https://www.livescience.com/63204-string-theory-multiverse.html)
Share this article
Join the conversation
[Follow us](https://google.com/preferences/source?q=livescience.com)
Add us as a preferred source on Google
Newsletter
Sign up for the Live Science daily newsletter now
Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.
***
By signing up, you agree to our [Terms of services](https:\/\/futureplc.com\/terms-conditions\/) and acknowledge that you have read our [Privacy Notice](https:\/\/futureplc.com\/privacy-policy\/). You also agree to receive marketing emails from us that may include promotions from our trusted partners and sponsors, which you can unsubscribe from at any time.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
***
Want to add more newsletters?
Delivered Daily
Daily Newsletter
Sign up for the latest discoveries, groundbreaking research and fascinating breakthroughs that impact you and the wider world direct to your inbox.
Subscribe +
Once a week
Life's Little Mysteries
Feed your curiosity with an exclusive mystery every week, solved with science and delivered direct to your inbox before it's seen anywhere else.
Subscribe +
Once a week
How It Works
Sign up to our free science & technology newsletter for your weekly fix of fascinating articles, quick quizzes, amazing images, and more
Subscribe +
Delivered daily
Space.com Newsletter
Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more\!
Subscribe +
Once a month
Watch This Space
Sign up to our monthly entertainment newsletter to keep up with all our coverage of the latest sci-fi and space movies, tv shows, games and books.
Subscribe +
Once a week
Night Sky This Week
Discover this week's must-see night sky events, moon phases, and stunning astrophotos. Sign up for our skywatching newsletter and explore the universe with us\!
Subscribe +
***
Join the club
Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.
[Explore](https://www.livescience.com/membership)
***
An account already exists for this email address, please log in.
Subscribe to our newsletter
The problem with string theory, according to some physicists, is that it makes too many universes. It predicts not one but some 10500versions of spacetime, each with their own laws of physics. But with so many universes on the table, how can the theory explain why ours has the features it does?
Now some theorists suggest most—if not all—of those universes are actually forbidden, at least if we want them to have stable dark energy, the supposed force accelerating the expansion of the cosmos. To some, eliminating so many possible universes is not a drawback but a major step forward for string theory, offering new hope of making testable predictions. But others say the multiverse is here to stay, and the proposed problem with all those universes is not a problem at all.
The debate was a hot topic at the end of June in Japan, where string theorists convened for the conference Strings 2018. "This is really something new and it's led to a controversy within the field," says Ulf Danielsson, a physicist at Uppsala University in Sweden. The conversation centers on a [pair](https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.08362) of [papers](https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09718) posted on the preprint server arXiv last month taking aim at the so-called [“landscape” of string theory](https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-string-theory-landscape/)—the incomprehensible number of potential universes that result from the many different solutions to string theory's equations that produce the ingredients of our own cosmos, including dark energy. But the vast majority of the solutions found so far are mathematically inconsistent, the papers contend, putting them not in the landscape but in the so-called "swampland" of universes that cannot actually exist. Scientists have known many solutions must fall in this swampland for years, but the idea that most, or maybe all, of the landscape solutions might live there would be a major change. In fact, it may be theoretically impossible to find a valid solution to string theory that includes stable dark energy, says Cumrun Vafa, a Harvard University physicist who led the work on the two papers.
Article continues below
You may like
- [ Our leading theory of dark matter may be wrong, huge new gravity study hints](https://www.livescience.com/physics-mathematics/dark-matter/new-study-favors-fuzzy-dark-matter-as-the-backbone-of-the-universe-contrary-to-decades-of-research)
- [ 'Collective hum' of black holes could settle the debate over new physics](https://www.livescience.com/physics-mathematics/collective-hum-of-black-holes-could-mend-our-broken-understanding-of-the-universe-physicists-say)
- [ Our model of the universe is deeply flawed — unless space is actually a 'sticky' fluid](https://www.livescience.com/physics-mathematics/dark-energy/our-model-of-the-universe-is-deeply-flawed-unless-space-is-actually-a-sticky-fluid-new-research-hints)
Latest Videos From Live Science
## Lost in the Multiverse
String theory is an attempt to describe the whole universe under a single "theory of everything" by adding extra dimensions of spacetime and thinking of particles as miniscule vibrating loops. Many string theorists contend it is still the most promising direction for pursuing Albert Einstein's dream of uniting his general theory of relativity with the conflicting microscopic world of quantum mechanics. Yet the notion of a string theory landscape that predicts not just one universe but many has put some physicists off. "If it's really the landscape, in my view it's death for the theory because it loses all predictive value," says Princeton University physicist Paul Steinhardt, who collaborated on one of the recent papers. "Literally anything is possible." To Steinhardt and others, the newfound problems with dark energy offer string theory a way out. "This picture with a big multiverse could be mathematically wrong," Danielsson says. "Paradoxically this makes things much more interesting because that means string theory is much more predictive than we thought it was."
Some string theorists such as Savdeep Sethi of the University of Chicago welcome the reevaluation that is happening now. "I think this is exciting," he says. "I've been a skeptic of the landscape for a long time. I'm really happy to see the paradigm shift away from this belief that we have this proven set of solutions." But not everyone buys the argument that the landscape actually belongs in the swampland—especially the research team that established one of the earliest versions of the landscape in the first place back in 2003, which goes by the acronym [KKLT](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0301240) after the scientists' last names. "I think it's very healthy to make these conjectures and check what other things could be going on but I don't see either theoretical or experimental reasons to take such a conjecture very seriously," says KKLT member Shamit Kachru of Stanford University. And Eva Silverstein, a Stanford physicist who also helped build the early landscape models, likewise doubts Vafa and his colleagues' argument. "I think the ingredients KKLT use and the way they put them together is perfectly valid," she says. Juan Maldacena, a theorist at the Institute for Advanced Study, says he also still supports the idea of string theory universes with stable dark energy.
And many theorists are perfectly happy with the string theory multiverse. "It is true that if this landscape picture is correct, the bit of the universe we're in compared to the multiverse will be like our [solar system](https://www.livescience.com/tag/solar-system) within the universe," Kachru says. And that is a good thing, he adds. Johannes Kepler originally sought a fundamental reason for why Earth lies the distance it does from the sun. But now we know the sun is just one of billions of stars in the galaxy, each with its own planets, and the Earth–sun distance is simply a random number rather than a result of some deep mathematical principle. Likewise, if the universe is one of trillions within the multiverse, the particular parameters of our cosmos are similarly random. The fact these numbers seem perfectly fine-tuned to create a habitable universe is a selection effect—humans will of course find themselves in one of the rare corners of the multiverse where it is possible for them to have evolved.
## The Accelerating Universe
If it is true string theory cannot accommodate stable dark energy, that may be a reason to doubt string theory. But to Vafa it is a reason to doubt dark energy—that is, dark energy in its most popular form, called a cosmological constant. The idea originated in 1917 with Einstein and was revived in 1998 when astronomers discovered that not only is spacetime expanding—the rate of that expansion is picking up. The cosmological constant would be a form of energy in the vacuum of space that never changes and counteracts the inward pull of gravity. But it is not the only possible explanation for the accelerating universe. An alternative is "quintessence," a field pervading spacetime that can evolve. "Regardless of whether one can realize a stable dark energy in string theory or not, it turns out that the idea of having dark energy changing over time is actually more natural in string theory," Vafa says. "If this is the case, then one can measure this sliding of dark energy by astrophysical observations currently taking place."
Sign up for the Live Science daily newsletter now
Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our [Terms of services](https:\/\/futureplc.com\/terms-conditions\/) and acknowledge that you have read our [Privacy Notice](https:\/\/futureplc.com\/privacy-policy\/). You also agree to receive marketing emails from us that may include promotions from our trusted partners and sponsors, which you can unsubscribe from at any time.
So far all astrophysical evidence supports the cosmological constant idea, but there is some wiggle room in the measurements. Upcoming experiments such as Europe's Euclid space telescope, [NASA](https://www.livescience.com/tag/nasa)'s Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST) and the Simons Observatory being built in Chile's desert will look for signs dark energy was stronger or weaker in the past than the present. "The interesting thing is that we're already at a sensitivity level to begin to put pressure on \[the cosmological constant theory\]." Steinhardt says. "We don't have to wait for new technology to be in the game. We're in the game now." And even skeptics of Vafa's proposal support the idea of considering alternatives to the cosmological constant. "I actually agree that \[a changing dark energy field\] is a simplifying method for constructing accelerated expansion," Silverstein says. "But I don't think there's any justification for making observational predictions about the dark energy at this point."
Quintessence is not the only other option. In the wake of Vafa's papers, Danielsson and colleagues proposed [another way of fitting dark energy into string theory](https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.01570). In their vision our universe is the three-dimensional surface of a bubble expanding within a larger-dimensional space. "The physics within this surface can mimic the physics of a cosmological constant," Danielsson says. "This is a different way of realizing dark energy compared to what we've been thinking so far."
## A Beautiful Theory
Ultimately the debate going on in string theory centers on a deep question: What is the point of physics? Should a good theory be able to explain the particular characteristics of the universe around us or is that asking too much? And when a theory conflicts with the way we think our universe works, do we abandon the theory or the things we think we know?
What to read next
- [ Exotic prime numbers could be hiding inside black holes](https://www.livescience.com/space/black-holes/exotic-prime-numbers-could-be-hiding-inside-black-holes)
- [ Dark matter and neutrinos may interact, hinting at 'fundamental breakthrough' in particle physics](https://www.livescience.com/physics-mathematics/particle-physics/scientists-may-be-approaching-a-fundamental-breakthrough-in-cosmology-and-particle-physics-if-dark-matter-and-ghost-particles-can-interact)
- [ Standard model of cosmology holds up in massive 6-year study of the universe](https://www.livescience.com/physics-mathematics/dark-energy/the-dream-has-come-true-standard-model-of-cosmology-holds-up-in-massive-6-year-study-of-the-universe-with-one-big-caveat)
String theory is incredibly appealing to many scientists because it is "beautiful"—its equations are satisfying and its proposed explanations elegant. But so far it lacks any experimental evidence supporting it—and even worse, any reasonable prospects for gathering such evidence. Yet even the suggestion string theory may not be able to accommodate the kind of dark energy we see in the cosmos around us does not dissuade some. "String theory is so rich and beautiful and so correct in almost all the things that it's taught us that it's hard to believe that the mistake is in string theory and not in us," Sethi says. But perhaps chasing after beauty is not a good way to find the right theory of the universe. "Mathematics is full of amazing and beautiful things, and most of them do not describe the world," physicist Sabine Hossenfelder of the Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies wrote in her recent book, *Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray* (Basic Books, 2018).
Despite the divergence of opinions, physicists are a friendly bunch, and are united by their common goal of understanding the universe. Kachru, one of the founders of the landscape idea, worked with Vafa, the landscape's critic, as his undergraduate advisor—and the two are still friends. "He asked me once if I'd bet my life these \[landscape solutions\] exist," Kachru says. "My answer was, 'I wouldn't bet my life but I'd bet his!'"
*Additional reporting by Lee Billings.*
*This story was provided by [Astrobiology Magazine](http://www.astrobio.net/), a web-based publication sponsored by the NASA [astrobiology program](http://www.astrobiology.arc.nasa.gov/).*
[Clara Moskowitz](https://www.livescience.com/author/clara-moskowitz)
Social Links Navigation
Clara has a bachelor's degree in astronomy and physics from Wesleyan University, and a graduate certificate in science writing from the University of California, Santa Cruz. She has written for both Space.com and Live Science.
Read more
[ Cosmology Our leading theory of dark matter may be wrong, huge new gravity study hints](https://www.livescience.com/physics-mathematics/dark-matter/new-study-favors-fuzzy-dark-matter-as-the-backbone-of-the-universe-contrary-to-decades-of-research "Our leading theory of dark matter may be wrong, huge new gravity study hints")
[ Physics & Mathematics 'Collective hum' of black holes could settle the debate over new physics](https://www.livescience.com/physics-mathematics/collective-hum-of-black-holes-could-mend-our-broken-understanding-of-the-universe-physicists-say "'Collective hum' of black holes could settle the debate over new physics")
[ Cosmology Our model of the universe is deeply flawed — unless space is actually a 'sticky' fluid](https://www.livescience.com/physics-mathematics/dark-energy/our-model-of-the-universe-is-deeply-flawed-unless-space-is-actually-a-sticky-fluid-new-research-hints "Our model of the universe is deeply flawed — unless space is actually a 'sticky' fluid")
[ Black Holes Exotic prime numbers could be hiding inside black holes](https://www.livescience.com/space/black-holes/exotic-prime-numbers-could-be-hiding-inside-black-holes "Exotic prime numbers could be hiding inside black holes")
[ Particle Physics Dark matter and neutrinos may interact, hinting at 'fundamental breakthrough' in particle physics](https://www.livescience.com/physics-mathematics/particle-physics/scientists-may-be-approaching-a-fundamental-breakthrough-in-cosmology-and-particle-physics-if-dark-matter-and-ghost-particles-can-interact "Dark matter and neutrinos may interact, hinting at 'fundamental breakthrough' in particle physics")
[ Cosmology Standard model of cosmology holds up in massive 6-year study of the universe](https://www.livescience.com/physics-mathematics/dark-energy/the-dream-has-come-true-standard-model-of-cosmology-holds-up-in-massive-6-year-study-of-the-universe-with-one-big-caveat "Standard model of cosmology holds up in massive 6-year study of the universe")
Latest in Astronomy
[ Meteoroids Cannonball-size meteorite crashes through roof of Texas home as multiple 'fireballs' rain down on the US](https://www.livescience.com/space/meteoroids/cannonball-size-meteorite-crashes-through-roof-of-texas-home-as-multiple-fireballs-rain-down-on-the-us "Cannonball-size meteorite crashes through roof of Texas home as multiple 'fireballs' rain down on the US")
[ Mars A rare active volcano on Mars may be causing the whole planet to spin faster](https://www.livescience.com/space/mars/a-rare-active-volcano-on-mars-may-be-causing-the-whole-planet-to-spin-faster "A rare active volcano on Mars may be causing the whole planet to spin faster")
[ Asteroids All 5 'letters' of DNA found on an asteroid speeding through our solar system. What do they tell us about the origins of life?](https://www.livescience.com/space/asteroids/all-5-letters-of-dna-found-on-an-asteroid-speeding-through-our-solar-system-what-do-they-tell-us-about-the-origins-of-life "All 5 'letters' of DNA found on an asteroid speeding through our solar system. What do they tell us about the origins of life?")
[ Astronomy Scientists witness birth of one of the universe's strongest magnets for the first time, thanks to a general relativity 'magic trick'](https://www.livescience.com/space/astronomy/scientists-witness-birth-of-one-of-the-universes-strongest-magnets-for-the-first-time-thanks-to-a-general-relativity-magic-trick "Scientists witness birth of one of the universe's strongest magnets for the first time, thanks to a general relativity 'magic trick'")
[ Meteoroids Rare 'daytime fireball' meteor creates powerful sonic boom as 7-ton space rock explodes above eastern US](https://www.livescience.com/space/meteoroids/rare-daytime-fireball-meteor-creates-powerful-sonic-boom-as-7-ton-space-rock-explodes-above-eastern-us "Rare 'daytime fireball' meteor creates powerful sonic boom as 7-ton space rock explodes above eastern US")
[ Astronomy 'A collision within a collision': Neutron star merger hiding in mini-galaxy could answer 2 big astrophysics questions](https://www.livescience.com/space/astronomy/a-collision-within-a-collision-neutron-star-merger-hiding-in-mini-galaxy-could-answer-2-big-astrophysics-questions "'A collision within a collision': Neutron star merger hiding in mini-galaxy could answer 2 big astrophysics questions")
Latest in News
[ Planet Earth Drought could fuel the rise of antibiotic-resistant superbugs as climate change worsens, new research suggests](https://www.livescience.com/planet-earth/drought-could-fuel-the-rise-of-antibiotic-superbugs-as-climate-change-worsens-new-research-suggests "Drought could fuel the rise of antibiotic-resistant superbugs as climate change worsens, new research suggests")
[ Archaeology Massive Iron Age hoards discovered in England may be from funeral of powerful Celtic queen](https://www.livescience.com/archaeology/massive-iron-age-hoards-discovered-in-england-may-be-from-funeral-of-powerful-celtic-queen "Massive Iron Age hoards discovered in England may be from funeral of powerful Celtic queen")
[ Meteoroids Cannonball-size meteorite crashes through roof of Texas home as multiple 'fireballs' rain down on the US](https://www.livescience.com/space/meteoroids/cannonball-size-meteorite-crashes-through-roof-of-texas-home-as-multiple-fireballs-rain-down-on-the-us "Cannonball-size meteorite crashes through roof of Texas home as multiple 'fireballs' rain down on the US")
[ Climate change Iran war has already released a staggering amount of CO2 — and the destruction of schools, homes and buildings is the biggest source](https://www.livescience.com/planet-earth/climate-change/iran-war-has-already-released-a-staggering-amount-of-co2-and-the-destruction-of-schools-homes-and-buildings-is-the-biggest-source "Iran war has already released a staggering amount of CO2 — and the destruction of schools, homes and buildings is the biggest source")
[ Mars A rare active volcano on Mars may be causing the whole planet to spin faster](https://www.livescience.com/space/mars/a-rare-active-volcano-on-mars-may-be-causing-the-whole-planet-to-spin-faster "A rare active volcano on Mars may be causing the whole planet to spin faster")
[ Robotics AI compressed billions of years of evolution into seconds to create 'Lego-like robots' that can recover even when they lose limbs](https://www.livescience.com/technology/robotics/ai-compressed-billions-of-years-of-evolution-into-seconds-to-create-lego-like-robots-that-can-recover-even-when-they-lose-limbs "AI compressed billions of years of evolution into seconds to create 'Lego-like robots' that can recover even when they lose limbs")
LATEST ARTICLES
1. [](https://www.livescience.com/planet-earth/drought-could-fuel-the-rise-of-antibiotic-superbugs-as-climate-change-worsens-new-research-suggests "Drought could fuel the rise of antibiotic-resistant superbugs as climate change worsens, new research suggests")
1
[Drought could fuel the rise of antibiotic-resistant superbugs as climate change worsens, new research suggests](https://www.livescience.com/planet-earth/drought-could-fuel-the-rise-of-antibiotic-superbugs-as-climate-change-worsens-new-research-suggests)
2. 2
[Massive Iron Age hoards discovered in England may be from funeral of powerful Celtic queen](https://www.livescience.com/archaeology/massive-iron-age-hoards-discovered-in-england-may-be-from-funeral-of-powerful-celtic-queen)
3. 3
[Cannonball-size meteorite crashes through roof of Texas home as multiple 'fireballs' rain down on the US](https://www.livescience.com/space/meteoroids/cannonball-size-meteorite-crashes-through-roof-of-texas-home-as-multiple-fireballs-rain-down-on-the-us)
4. 4
[Iran war has already released a staggering amount of CO2 — and the destruction of schools, homes and buildings is the biggest source](https://www.livescience.com/planet-earth/climate-change/iran-war-has-already-released-a-staggering-amount-of-co2-and-the-destruction-of-schools-homes-and-buildings-is-the-biggest-source)
5. 5
[A rare active volcano on Mars may be causing the whole planet to spin faster](https://www.livescience.com/space/mars/a-rare-active-volcano-on-mars-may-be-causing-the-whole-planet-to-spin-faster)
Live Science is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. [Visit our corporate site](https://futureplc.com/).
[ Add as a preferred source on Google](https://google.com/preferences/source?q=livescience.com)
- [About Us](https://www.livescience.com/about-live-science)
- [Contact Future's experts](https://futureplc.com/contact/)
- [Terms and conditions](https://futureplc.com/terms-conditions/)
- [Privacy policy](https://futureplc.com/privacy-policy/)
- [Cookies policy](https://futureplc.com/cookies-policy/)
- [Accessibility Statement](https://futureplc.com/accessibility-statement/)
- [Advertise with us](https://go.future-advertising.com/Live-Science-Media-Kit.html)
- [Web notifications](https://www.livescience.com/how-to-turn-off-web-notifications-for-chrome-macos.html)
- [Careers](https://futureplc.com/careers/)
- [Editorial standards](https://www.livescience.com/editorial-standards)
- [How to pitch a story to us](https://www.livescience.com/how-to-pitch-live-science)
- [Do not sell or share my personal information](https://www.livescience.com/privacy-portal)
© Future US, Inc. Full 7th Floor, 130 West 42nd Street, New York, NY 10036.
Close
Please login or signup to comment
Please wait...
Login
Sign Up |
| Readable Markdown | 
(Image credit: Shutterstock/Juergen Faelchle)
The problem with string theory, according to some physicists, is that it makes too many universes. It predicts not one but some 10500versions of spacetime, each with their own laws of physics. But with so many universes on the table, how can the theory explain why ours has the features it does?
Now some theorists suggest most—if not all—of those universes are actually forbidden, at least if we want them to have stable dark energy, the supposed force accelerating the expansion of the cosmos. To some, eliminating so many possible universes is not a drawback but a major step forward for string theory, offering new hope of making testable predictions. But others say the multiverse is here to stay, and the proposed problem with all those universes is not a problem at all.
The debate was a hot topic at the end of June in Japan, where string theorists convened for the conference Strings 2018. "This is really something new and it's led to a controversy within the field," says Ulf Danielsson, a physicist at Uppsala University in Sweden. The conversation centers on a [pair](https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.08362) of [papers](https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.09718) posted on the preprint server arXiv last month taking aim at the so-called [“landscape” of string theory](https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-string-theory-landscape/)—the incomprehensible number of potential universes that result from the many different solutions to string theory's equations that produce the ingredients of our own cosmos, including dark energy. But the vast majority of the solutions found so far are mathematically inconsistent, the papers contend, putting them not in the landscape but in the so-called "swampland" of universes that cannot actually exist. Scientists have known many solutions must fall in this swampland for years, but the idea that most, or maybe all, of the landscape solutions might live there would be a major change. In fact, it may be theoretically impossible to find a valid solution to string theory that includes stable dark energy, says Cumrun Vafa, a Harvard University physicist who led the work on the two papers.
Article continues below
Latest Videos From Live Science
## Lost in the Multiverse
String theory is an attempt to describe the whole universe under a single "theory of everything" by adding extra dimensions of spacetime and thinking of particles as miniscule vibrating loops. Many string theorists contend it is still the most promising direction for pursuing Albert Einstein's dream of uniting his general theory of relativity with the conflicting microscopic world of quantum mechanics. Yet the notion of a string theory landscape that predicts not just one universe but many has put some physicists off. "If it's really the landscape, in my view it's death for the theory because it loses all predictive value," says Princeton University physicist Paul Steinhardt, who collaborated on one of the recent papers. "Literally anything is possible." To Steinhardt and others, the newfound problems with dark energy offer string theory a way out. "This picture with a big multiverse could be mathematically wrong," Danielsson says. "Paradoxically this makes things much more interesting because that means string theory is much more predictive than we thought it was."
Some string theorists such as Savdeep Sethi of the University of Chicago welcome the reevaluation that is happening now. "I think this is exciting," he says. "I've been a skeptic of the landscape for a long time. I'm really happy to see the paradigm shift away from this belief that we have this proven set of solutions." But not everyone buys the argument that the landscape actually belongs in the swampland—especially the research team that established one of the earliest versions of the landscape in the first place back in 2003, which goes by the acronym [KKLT](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0301240) after the scientists' last names. "I think it's very healthy to make these conjectures and check what other things could be going on but I don't see either theoretical or experimental reasons to take such a conjecture very seriously," says KKLT member Shamit Kachru of Stanford University. And Eva Silverstein, a Stanford physicist who also helped build the early landscape models, likewise doubts Vafa and his colleagues' argument. "I think the ingredients KKLT use and the way they put them together is perfectly valid," she says. Juan Maldacena, a theorist at the Institute for Advanced Study, says he also still supports the idea of string theory universes with stable dark energy.
And many theorists are perfectly happy with the string theory multiverse. "It is true that if this landscape picture is correct, the bit of the universe we're in compared to the multiverse will be like our [solar system](https://www.livescience.com/tag/solar-system) within the universe," Kachru says. And that is a good thing, he adds. Johannes Kepler originally sought a fundamental reason for why Earth lies the distance it does from the sun. But now we know the sun is just one of billions of stars in the galaxy, each with its own planets, and the Earth–sun distance is simply a random number rather than a result of some deep mathematical principle. Likewise, if the universe is one of trillions within the multiverse, the particular parameters of our cosmos are similarly random. The fact these numbers seem perfectly fine-tuned to create a habitable universe is a selection effect—humans will of course find themselves in one of the rare corners of the multiverse where it is possible for them to have evolved.
## The Accelerating Universe
If it is true string theory cannot accommodate stable dark energy, that may be a reason to doubt string theory. But to Vafa it is a reason to doubt dark energy—that is, dark energy in its most popular form, called a cosmological constant. The idea originated in 1917 with Einstein and was revived in 1998 when astronomers discovered that not only is spacetime expanding—the rate of that expansion is picking up. The cosmological constant would be a form of energy in the vacuum of space that never changes and counteracts the inward pull of gravity. But it is not the only possible explanation for the accelerating universe. An alternative is "quintessence," a field pervading spacetime that can evolve. "Regardless of whether one can realize a stable dark energy in string theory or not, it turns out that the idea of having dark energy changing over time is actually more natural in string theory," Vafa says. "If this is the case, then one can measure this sliding of dark energy by astrophysical observations currently taking place."
Get the world’s most fascinating discoveries delivered straight to your inbox.
So far all astrophysical evidence supports the cosmological constant idea, but there is some wiggle room in the measurements. Upcoming experiments such as Europe's Euclid space telescope, [NASA](https://www.livescience.com/tag/nasa)'s Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST) and the Simons Observatory being built in Chile's desert will look for signs dark energy was stronger or weaker in the past than the present. "The interesting thing is that we're already at a sensitivity level to begin to put pressure on \[the cosmological constant theory\]." Steinhardt says. "We don't have to wait for new technology to be in the game. We're in the game now." And even skeptics of Vafa's proposal support the idea of considering alternatives to the cosmological constant. "I actually agree that \[a changing dark energy field\] is a simplifying method for constructing accelerated expansion," Silverstein says. "But I don't think there's any justification for making observational predictions about the dark energy at this point."
Quintessence is not the only other option. In the wake of Vafa's papers, Danielsson and colleagues proposed [another way of fitting dark energy into string theory](https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.01570). In their vision our universe is the three-dimensional surface of a bubble expanding within a larger-dimensional space. "The physics within this surface can mimic the physics of a cosmological constant," Danielsson says. "This is a different way of realizing dark energy compared to what we've been thinking so far."
## A Beautiful Theory
Ultimately the debate going on in string theory centers on a deep question: What is the point of physics? Should a good theory be able to explain the particular characteristics of the universe around us or is that asking too much? And when a theory conflicts with the way we think our universe works, do we abandon the theory or the things we think we know?
String theory is incredibly appealing to many scientists because it is "beautiful"—its equations are satisfying and its proposed explanations elegant. But so far it lacks any experimental evidence supporting it—and even worse, any reasonable prospects for gathering such evidence. Yet even the suggestion string theory may not be able to accommodate the kind of dark energy we see in the cosmos around us does not dissuade some. "String theory is so rich and beautiful and so correct in almost all the things that it's taught us that it's hard to believe that the mistake is in string theory and not in us," Sethi says. But perhaps chasing after beauty is not a good way to find the right theory of the universe. "Mathematics is full of amazing and beautiful things, and most of them do not describe the world," physicist Sabine Hossenfelder of the Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies wrote in her recent book, *Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray* (Basic Books, 2018).
Despite the divergence of opinions, physicists are a friendly bunch, and are united by their common goal of understanding the universe. Kachru, one of the founders of the landscape idea, worked with Vafa, the landscape's critic, as his undergraduate advisor—and the two are still friends. "He asked me once if I'd bet my life these \[landscape solutions\] exist," Kachru says. "My answer was, 'I wouldn't bet my life but I'd bet his!'"
*Additional reporting by Lee Billings.*
*This story was provided by [Astrobiology Magazine](http://www.astrobio.net/), a web-based publication sponsored by the NASA [astrobiology program](http://www.astrobiology.arc.nasa.gov/).*
Clara has a bachelor's degree in astronomy and physics from Wesleyan University, and a graduate certificate in science writing from the University of California, Santa Cruz. She has written for both Space.com and Live Science. |
| Shard | 78 (laksa) |
| Root Hash | 4110033003681956278 |
| Unparsed URL | com,livescience!www,/63204-string-theory-multiverse.html s443 |