🕷️ Crawler Inspector

URL Lookup

Direct Parameter Lookup

Raw Queries and Responses

1. Shard Calculation

Query:

Response:

Calculated Shard: 151 (from laksa148)

2. Crawled Status Check

Query:

curl -X POST \
  'http://laksa151.int.ahrefs:8124/' \
  -H 'Content-Type: text/plain' \
  -H 'X-ClickHouse-Database: crawler3' \
  -H 'Authorization: Basic YXBpOg==' \
  -d 'SELECT getAhrefsURLFromUnparsed(src_unparsed) AS found_url, ifNull(toUnixTimestamp(download_stamp), 0) AS crawl_time, ifNull(toUnixTimestamp(props_url_first_seen), 0) AS first_indexed_time, download_http_code AS http_code, src_unparsed AS src_unparsed, src_root_hash AS src_root_hash, history_drop_reason AS history_drop_reason, meta_title AS meta_title, meta_descriptions AS meta_descriptions, attrs_boilerpipe_text AS attrs_boilerpipe_text, attrs_markdown AS attrs_markdown, attrs_readable_markdown AS attrs_readable_markdown, meta_canonical AS meta_canonical FROM crawler3.page_info_local FINAL PREWHERE (src_root_hash, src_unparsed) IN ((getAhrefsRootHashFromUnparsed(getAhrefsUnparsedNoserviceFromURL(\'https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/study_102011_1.html\')), getAhrefsUnparsedNoserviceFromURL(\'https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/study_102011_1.html\'))) FORMAT JSONEachRow'

Response:

{"found_url":"https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/study_102011_1.html","crawl_time":1775800293,"first_indexed_time":1451483119,"http_code":200,"src_unparsed":"gov,huduser!www,\/portal\/casestudies\/study_102011_1.html s443","src_root_hash":"8932665093783123951","history_drop_reason":null,"meta_title":"Los Angeles, California: Small Lot Ordinance | HUD USER","meta_descriptions":[],"attrs_boilerpipe_text":"Home\n>\nCase Studies\n> Los Angeles, California: Small Lot Ordinance\nLos Angeles, California: Small Lot Ordinance\nLos Angeles, dubbed the “City of Angels,” is the second-largest city in the United States. A multicultural city known as the hub of the entertainment industry and a center of arts, culture, and fashion, Los Angeles has suffered one of the most devastating economic recessions in the nation. Fueled by the California budget and housing crises, the\nunemployment rate\nin Los Angeles was 5.6 percent in 2007 and rose to 12.8 percent in 2009 — both figures above the national rate of 4.6 percent and 9.3 percent, respectively.\nIn 2009, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa’s office\nreported\nthat the city was suffering from declining home values, increasing foreclosure rates, and rising unemployment. New housing development suffered most.  According to the city’s building permit valuation for residential construction, new housing construction dropped from more than $2.5 billion in 2007 to less than $1 billion in 2009.  Despite the looming economic crisis, from 2000 to 2010, Los Angeles’ population increased by 9.8 percent (from 3.7 to 4.1 million).  The city is beginning to show signs of economic recovery, but tightening lending practices have stalled new housing construction, adding to the city’s housing conundrum — a high demand for moderately priced housing at a time when government and industry limitations are at their peak. Housing developers are left with two possibilities: abandon housing projects or seek new and innovative ways to get projects off the ground. With the help of a 2005 city ordinance, several developers have pursued the latter option.\nBackground\nIn 1999, the Los Angeles city council established the Housing Crisis Task Force in response to the city’s severe affordable housing shortage. In the months that followed, the task force released a report,\nIn Short Supply\n, to identify strategies aimed at alleviating the housing crisis.  The report found that 372,000 housing units were overcrowded (102,000 of which were severely overcrowded), accounting for 30 percent of total housing units within the city. Thousands of affordable housing units were being demolished every year to make way for more luxurious homes, and the nearly built-out city did not have the land to accommodate new housing development. The task force strongly recommended increasing the availability and production of affordable housing through innovative land use strategies. One such strategy included facilitating affordable homeownership through a small lot program.\nIn November 2000, the city’s planning commission evaluated more than 60 proposals to increase production of affordable and market-rate housing. Twenty-five proposals were recommended for further study, including small lot development. The small lot program met the task force’s requirement that it increase homeownership opportunities through innovative land use. Under the program, the city would subdivide lots located within existing multifamily and commercial zones to develop fee-simple, detached townhomes that would not be required to be part of a homeowner’s association. These small lot or townhome units would allow buyers to own both the land and the structure, rather than just a percentage of shared space (as in a condominium project), making them more attractive to first-time buyers.\nAt the time the proposal was being reviewed, the city’s zoning code allowed for only the construction of apartments or condominiums in multifamily residential zones. Single-family homes were also allowed, but the minimum lot size requirement of approximately 5,000 square feet did not make detached housing a viable alternative for housing developers. In 2004, after years of examining and modifying the proposed code, the Los Angeles City Planning Department formally presented the City Council with a proposed ordinance to permit small lot housing. In 2005, the city passed the proposal into law.\nThe Small Lot Subdivision (Townhome) Ordinance\nThe\nSmall Lot Subdivision (Townhome) Ordinance\nis an amendment to the Los Angeles Municipal Code.  The ordinance permits small lot developments in the form of detached townhouses. To accomplish this, the definition of “lots” was amended to specify that the 20-foot street frontage requirement would not apply to an approved small lot subdivision. Parking requirements were also amended; small lot developments are not required to provide parking spaces on the same lot, as is the case with all other residential zones, but are still required to provide two garaged parking spaces per unit. The ordinance also allows one parcel to be subdivided into a single home, a duplex, or a triplex, as long as the subdivision does not exceed the dwelling unit requirement established by the underlying zone.\nTo allow developers even more flexibility, the city chose to adopt minimum (rather than maximum) development standards. For example, the minimum lot width of a small lot could be 16 feet and the minimum lot area may be as small as 600 square feet. In addition, each lot is not subject to front, side, or rear yard setback requirements between each parcel. When abutting a parcel that is not a small lot subdivision, however, a 5-foot side yard is required. Primarily, the ordinance reduces minimum lot size and side yard requirements to allow for creative townhome developments. This ordinance extends to all multifamily and commercial zones, but does not apply to single-family zones.\nDesign Guidelines\nThe\nCity of Los Angeles Small Lot Design Guidelines\ncomplement the adopted ordinance in promoting the design and creation of small lot housing with neighborhood compatibility in mind.  The guidelines outline site organization and urban form, parking and driveways, building design and materials, and landscaping and access. Two themes are seen throughout the document: creative approaches to spatial complexities with innovative site layouts and high-quality design elements that enhance the overall character of the neighborhood. For example, builders and designers must consider where to place parking, driveways, and open space, all while taking into account the footprint of the townhouses and how they relate to street frontages and adjoining lots. Builders and designers must also ensure that small lot units in close proximity preserve residents’ privacy and allow adequate natural light and ventilation.\nThe Guidelines also illustrate how design elements can enhance the aesthetics of a neighborhood. For example, townhouses should be designed with variations in height and massing, not built out to the maximum volume allowed under the code. Townhouses that tower over surrounding properties can disrupt the overall quality of the street and public realm. Building design and materials requirements are more difficult to establish because of the area’s rich architectural diversity, but the Guidelines recommend that designers consider using materials found in adjacent properties to help small lot developments blend into the neighborhood. This consistency is required in all aspects of design and placement, from setbacks to grade level and entryways.\nWhy Build Small Lot Developments?\nCities that continuously attract new residents must identify new housing options that will accommodate a financially diverse population. The following are several reasons why small lot developments are beneficial to build in today’s economy:\nSmall lot developments increase homeownership at reduced costs.\nSmall lot developments are fee-simple units that increase homeownership opportunities while working within existing land use designations. Because these units are fee-simple, homeowners acquire ownership of the housing structure, as well as the land on which it’s built. When the amount of land needed for housing construction is decreased, the savings in land costs can be passed on to the homebuyer.\nSmall lot developments increase housing production.\nAlthough small lot developments do not technically increase zoning density, they are usually built on underutilized lots, thereby increasing the number of units made available to the public.\nSmall housing developments are not subject to monthly homeowners’ association (HOA) fees.\nHOAs\nare corporations with formal bylaws created to maintain common areas within a certain development. Members are charged monthly fees ranging from $250 to $750 (depending on the area) to cover the cost of property management.  Small lot developments are constructed without common walls or foundations and therefore do not require HOAs.\nSmall lot developments are easier to finance than condominium projects.\nNew housing development in Los Angeles has come to a standstill. Stringent lending practices and insurance liabilities have made condominium projects (which are usually targeted to median-income residents) nonexistent. An increase in construction\ndefect litigation\nhas forced condominium HOAs to require additional insurance that can cost more than $20,000 a unit.  Because small lot developments do not require HOAs, they do not face mandatory additional insurance costs, which makes obtaining bank financing easier.\nHow Can the Program Be Improved?\nAlthough the small lot ordinance has garnered much acclaim, implementing small lot developments can still be challenging for developers. First, subdividing land for small lot development can take up to a year (or longer), making the entitlement process complicated, time consuming, and costly. Small lot developments are subject to the\nCalifornia Subdivision Map Act\n, and developers are required to provide additional information over and above the customary requirements for new subdivision or parcel map applications.  The subdivision application must also include a maintenance association to maintain all common areas and proof of accessibility by the city’s Fire Department and the Bureau of Sanitation. One suggestion to remedy this issue, made by architects specializing in small lot development, is to involve the city in the entitlement process. Having the Los Angeles Housing Authority hold the property until the subdivision is approved could save thousands of dollars in accrued interest — savings that could be passed on to homebuyers.\nSecond, the language of the ordinance makes it difficult for small lot developers to apply the same standards from project to project. “In a city like Los Angeles, it’s difficult to apply citywide ordinances. Test areas are harder to come by because neighborhoods are very diverse. What works in one neighborhood would not necessarily work in another,” explains Jane Blumenfeld, Acting Deputy Director (retired) of the Los Angeles Department of Planning. Although the ordinance does not have detailed development standards, the design guidelines communicate a clear vision of how the completed project should appear. Creating a consistent approval process and establishing an architectural review board specifically for small lot developments may solve this problem.\nParking requirements are another limitation to small lot development. Minimum parking requirements that do not reflect actual need decrease affordability by increasing housing costs and reducing the amount of land available for housing. In this case, a project may or may not move forward because of the limitations induced by such requirements. A typical\nparking space\nrequires up to 300 square feet; the small lot ordinance generally requires that each unit provide two garaged parking spaces, further restricting the ability to build.  Tailoring parking requirements to reflect the availability of transit options will promote compact, pedestrian-friendly, and affordable neighborhoods.\nFinally, a complicated permitting process can significantly delay projects. Developers applying for permits in the city of Los Angeles must go through approximately 17 steps and a number of multi-departmental approvals in order to obtain a final building permit. Additionally, a lack of communication between departments results in conflicting instructions, further delaying the approval process. A new plan,\nBuild L.A.\n, proposes to streamline construction permitting by assigning a city case manager to developers working on larger projects.  The goal is to have one point of contact for each project; the proposal is meant to improve efficiency and transparency in the approval process.\nThe small lot ordinance still requires some revisions in order for it to more adequately  serve its purpose, but with the down real estate market, this housing strategy has engendered a fair amount of curiosity. “We’ve seen an uptick in small lot interest over the last several months,” explains Derek Leavitt, AIA of\nModative\n, an architectural firm based in Los Angeles that specializes in small lot development. “Many of these projects are developers with entitled, but unbuilt condominium projects that are no longer able to be financed. A few developers have come to us with these defunct unbuilt condo projects, with the hope of converting them into small lot subdivision projects. Although we are early on in the process of studying these conversions, we’re hopeful that small lot [development] can rescue some of these condo projects.”","attrs_markdown":"[Skip to main content](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/study_102011_1.html#main-content)\n\n![](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/themes\/contrib\/uswds_base_subtheme_bootstrap\/assets\/uswds\/img\/us_flag_small.png)\n\nAn official website of the United States government\n\nHere's how you know\n\nHere's how you know\n\n![Dot gov](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/themes\/contrib\/uswds_base_subtheme_bootstrap\/assets\/uswds\/img\/icon-dot-gov.svg)\n\n**Official websites use .gov**   \n A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.\n\n![Https](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/themes\/contrib\/uswds_base_subtheme_bootstrap\/assets\/uswds\/img\/icon-https.svg)\n\n**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**   \n A **lock** ( Locked padlock ) or **https:\/\/** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.\n\n[![HUD User Email Icon](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/sites\/default\/files\/images\/header-white-email-v2.png)](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/subscribe\/subscribe.html)  [![HUD User Forums Icon](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/sites\/default\/files\/images\/header-white-forums-v2.png)](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/forums)  [![HUD User Facebook Icon](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/sites\/default\/files\/images\/header-white-facebook-v2.png)](https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/HUD-User-183685747712\/)  [![HUD Youtube Icon](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/sites\/default\/files\/images\/header-white-youtube-v2.png)](https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/HUDchannel)  [![HUD User X Icon](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/sites\/default\/files\/images2\/header-white-twitter-v2.png)](https:\/\/x.com\/HUDUSERNEWS)  [![HUD User Linkedin Icon](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/sites\/default\/files\/images\/footer-social-icons-linkedin-white-sqr.png)](https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/huduser)  [![HUD Flicker Icon](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/sites\/default\/files\/images\/header-white-flickr-v2.png)](https:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/hudopa\/)  [![HUD Instagram Icon](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/sites\/default\/files\/images\/header-white-instagram-v2.png)](https:\/\/instagram.com\/hudgov)  [Quicklinks](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/quicklinks.html) [Events](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/events.html) [Contact Us](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/pdrconta.html)\n\n*[![Home](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/sites\/default\/files\/HUDUser-HUGOV-Logo_1.png)](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/ \"Home\")   [HUD USER](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/ \"Home\")*\n\nMenu\n\n![close](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/themes\/contrib\/uswds_base_subtheme_bootstrap\/assets\/uswds\/img\/usa-icons\/close.svg)\n\n- ABOUT PD\\&R\n  ### [ABOUT PD\\&R](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/pdrabout.html)\n  [PD\\&R Mission](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/mission_and_background.html)\n  \n  [Funding Opportunities](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/ota\/funding-opportunities.html)\n  \n  [Biennial Reports](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/biennial.html)\n  \n  [Office\/Division Descriptions](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/pdrdvsn_desc.html)\n  \n  [Organizational Chart](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/org_charts.html)\n  \n  [Field Economist Organizational Chart](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/field-economist-orgchart.html)\n  \n  [Brochures and Guides](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/guidelines_and_brochures.html)\n  \n  [Events](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/events.html)\n  \n  [PD\\&R Jobs](https:\/\/www.usajobs.gov\/Search\/Results?a=HURR&p=1)\n  \n  [Innovative Housing Showcase](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/ihs.html)\n  \n  [Eviction Protection Grant Program](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/eviction-protection-grant.html)\n  \n  [IAH Student Design and Planning Competition](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/challenge\/home.html)\n  \n  [International and Philanthropic Affairs Division](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/ipad\/home.html)\n  \n  [Office of Technical Assistance](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/ota\/homepage.html)\n  \n  [Office of the Chief Data Officer](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/ocdo\/homepage.html)\n  \n  [HUD Secretary's Awards](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/secaward.html)\n  \n  [HUD History](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/history-of-hud.html)\n  \n  [HUD Evaluation Policy Statement](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/evaluation-policy.html)\n  \n  [Programs of HUD](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/publications\/programs-of-hud.html)\n- RESEARCH & PUBLICATIONS\n  ### [RESEARCH & PUBLICATIONS](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/publications\/pdrpubli.html)\n  [Reports and Publications](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/publications\/pdrpubli.html)\n  \n  [Evidence Building](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/pdr_learningagenda.html \"Learning Agenda & Research Roadmap\")\n  \n  [Ongoing Research Activities](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/ongoing\/homepage.html)\n  \n  [Research Centers of Excellence](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/msi\/centers-of-excellence.html)\n  \n  [Research Partnerships](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/rp\/home.html)\n  \n  [PD\\&R Studies](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/publications\/pdr_studies.html)\n  \n  [Other PD\\&R Projects](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/other-pdr-projects.html)\n  \n  [U.S. Housing Market Conditions](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/ushmc\/home.html \"U.S. Housing Market Conditions\")\n  \n  [Periodicals](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/periodicals\/pdrperio.html)\n  \n  - [Cityscape](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/periodicals\/cityscape.html \"Cityscape\")\n  - [Evidence Matters](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/evidence.html \"Evidence Matters\")\n  - [PD\\&R Edge](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/pdredge\/pdr_edge_home.html)\n  - [Past Periodicals](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/periodicals\/pastperio.html)\n  \n  [Case Studies](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/home.html)\n  \n  [Historical Reports](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/publications\/pdrpubli\/20thCentury.html)\n  \n  [Multidisciplinary Research Team](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/publications\/mdrt_reports.html)\n  \n  [Webstore](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/webstore\/)\n  \n  [eBookstore](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/eBookStore.html)\n  \n  [Regulatory Barriers Clearinghouse](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/rbc\/home.html)\n  \n  [Staff Working Papers](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/publications\/workpapr.html)\n- DATASETS\n  ### [DATASETS](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/pdrdatas_landing.html)\n  [ACS-HUD Data Linkage](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/acs-hud-data-linkage.html)\n  \n  [American Housing Survey](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/ahs.html \"American Housing Survey\")\n  \n  [Data License for Access to Restricted Data](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/research\/pdr_data-license.html)\n  \n  [Fair Market Rents](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/fmr.html)\n  \n  [Geospatial Data Resources](https:\/\/hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com\/)\n  \n  [Income Limits](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/il.html)\n  \n  [50th Percentile Rent Estimates](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/50per.html)\n  \n  [Consolidated Planning\/CHAS Data](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/cp.html)\n  \n  [Dataset Update Schedule](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/update-schedule.html)\n  \n  [Low-Income Housing Tax Credit](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/lihtc.html)\n  \n  [NCHS - HUD Data Linkage](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/nchs-hud-data-linkage.html)\n  \n  [Picture of Subsidized Households](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/assthsg.html)\n  \n  [Public Use Microdata Sample](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/pumd\/index.html)\n  \n  [Qualified Census Tracts and Difficult Development Areas](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/qct.html)\n  \n  [Special Tabulations of Households](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/spectabs.html)\n  \n  [State of the Cities Data Systems (SOCDS)](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/socds.html)\n  \n  [Components of Inventory Change (CINCH)](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/cinch.html)\n  \n  [USPS Vacancy Data](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/usps.html)\n  \n  [USPS Zip Code Crosswalk Files](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/usps_crosswalk.html)\n  \n  [Mapping Applications](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/mapping-applications.html)\n  \n  - [Choice Neighborhoods](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/maps\/CN\/home.html)\n  - [Neighborhood Change Web Map](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/apps\/public\/usps\/ncwm-login)\n  - [Small DDAs and QCT](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/sadda\/sadda_qct.html)\n- QUICK LINKS\n  ### [QUICK LINKS](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/quicklinks.html)\n  [Archives](http:\/\/archives.huduser.gov\/)\n  \n  [ConnectHome](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/connect-home.html)\n  \n  [Disaster Recovery](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/sandy.html \"Natural and Man-made Hazards\")\n  \n  [eBookstore](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/eBookStore.html)\n  \n  [FAQ](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/faq.html \"FAQ\")\n  \n  [First-time Visitor](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/firsttimevisit.html \"First Time Visitor?\")\n  \n  [Glossary](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/glossary\/glossary.html)\n  \n  [Guidelines for Preparing a Report for Publication](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/About\/style-guide-for-reports.pdf)\n  \n  [HUD Historical Timeline](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/hud_timeline\/)\n  \n  [HUD Regional Map](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/regions\/Regional.html)\n  \n  [HUD USER Forum](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/forums\/)\n  \n  [International and Philanthropic Affairs Division](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/ipad\/home.html)\n  \n  [Local Housing Assistance](https:\/\/www.hud.gov\/program_offices\/public_indian_housing\/pha\/contacts)\n  \n  [The Office of University Partnerships (OUP)](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/oup\/home.html)\n  \n  [Peer Review of Highly Influential Scientific Information](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/pdr_peer_review.html \"Peer Review Agenda of HUD Influential and Highly Influential Scientific Assessments\")\n  \n  [Programs of HUD](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/publications\/programs-of-hud.html)\n  \n  [Small Business Opportunities](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/news\/smallbusiness.html \"Small Business Opportunities\")\n  \n  [Research Partnerships](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/oup\/research_partnerships.html \"OUP | Research Partnerships\")\n  \n  [Social Networking](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/social_network.html)\n  \n  [Student Resources](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/student.html \"Student Resources\")\n  \n  [Subscribe](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/subscribe\/subscribe.html)\n  \n  [Webstore](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/webstore\/)\n- [EVENTS](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/events.html)\n\n- ABOUT PD\\&R\n  ### [ABOUT PD\\&R](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/pdrabout.html)\n  - [PD\\&R Mission](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/mission_and_background.html)\n  - [Funding Opportunities](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/ota\/funding-opportunities.html)\n  - [Biennial Reports](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/biennial.html)\n  - [Office\/Division Descriptions](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/pdrdvsn_desc.html)\n  - [Organizational Chart](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/org_charts.html)\n  - [Field Economist Organizational Chart](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/field-economist-orgchart.html)\n  - [Brochures and Guides](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/guidelines_and_brochures.html)\n  - [Events](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/events.html)\n  \n  - [PD\\&R Jobs](https:\/\/www.usajobs.gov\/Search\/Results?a=HURR&p=1)\n  - [Innovative Housing Showcase](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/ihs.html)\n  - [Eviction Protection Grant Program](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/eviction-protection-grant.html)\n  - [IAH Student Design and Planning Competition](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/challenge\/home.html)\n  - [International and Philanthropic Affairs Division](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/ipad\/home.html)\n  - [Office of Technical Assistance](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/ota\/homepage.html)\n  - [Office of the Chief Data Officer](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/ocdo\/homepage.html)\n  \n  - [HUD Secretary's Awards](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/secaward.html)\n  - [HUD History](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/history-of-hud.html)\n  - [HUD Evaluation Policy Statement](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/evaluation-policy.html)\n  - [Programs of HUD](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/publications\/programs-of-hud.html)\n- RESEARCH & PUBLICATIONS\n  ### [RESEARCH & PUBLICATIONS](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/publications\/pdrpubli.html)\n  - [Reports and Publications](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/publications\/pdrpubli.html)\n  - [Evidence Building](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/pdr_learningagenda.html \"Learning Agenda & Research Roadmap\")\n  - [Ongoing Research Activities](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/ongoing\/homepage.html)\n  - [Research Centers of Excellence](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/msi\/centers-of-excellence.html)\n  - [Research Partnerships](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/rp\/home.html)\n  - [PD\\&R Studies](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/publications\/pdr_studies.html)\n  - [Other PD\\&R Projects](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/other-pdr-projects.html)\n  - [U.S. Housing Market Conditions](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/ushmc\/home.html \"U.S. Housing Market Conditions\")\n  \n  - [Periodicals](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/periodicals\/pdrperio.html)\n    - [Cityscape](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/periodicals\/cityscape.html \"Cityscape\")\n    - [Evidence Matters](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/evidence.html \"Evidence Matters\")\n    - [PD\\&R Edge](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/pdredge\/pdr_edge_home.html)\n    - [Past Periodicals](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/periodicals\/pastperio.html)\n  \n  - [Case Studies](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/home.html)\n  - [Historical Reports](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/publications\/pdrpubli\/20thCentury.html)\n  - [Multidisciplinary Research Team](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/publications\/mdrt_reports.html)\n  - [Webstore](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/webstore\/)\n  - [eBookstore](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/eBookStore.html)\n  - [Regulatory Barriers Clearinghouse](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/rbc\/home.html)\n  - [Staff Working Papers](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/publications\/workpapr.html)\n- DATASETS\n  ### [DATASETS](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/pdrdatas_landing.html)\n  - [ACS-HUD Data Linkage](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/acs-hud-data-linkage.html)\n  - [American Housing Survey](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/ahs.html \"American Housing Survey\")\n  - [Data License for Access to Restricted Data](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/research\/pdr_data-license.html)\n  - [Fair Market Rents](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/fmr.html)\n  - [Geospatial Data Resources](https:\/\/hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com\/)\n  - [Income Limits](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/il.html)\n  - [50th Percentile Rent Estimates](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/50per.html)\n  - [Consolidated Planning\/CHAS Data](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/cp.html)\n  - [Dataset Update Schedule](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/update-schedule.html)\n  - [Low-Income Housing Tax Credit](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/lihtc.html)\n  \n  - [NCHS - HUD Data Linkage](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/nchs-hud-data-linkage.html)\n  - [Picture of Subsidized Households](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/assthsg.html)\n  - [Public Use Microdata Sample](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/pumd\/index.html)\n  - [Qualified Census Tracts and Difficult Development Areas](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/qct.html)\n  - [Special Tabulations of Households](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/spectabs.html)\n  - [State of the Cities Data Systems (SOCDS)](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/socds.html)\n  \n  - [Components of Inventory Change (CINCH)](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/cinch.html)\n  - [USPS Vacancy Data](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/usps.html)\n  - [USPS Zip Code Crosswalk Files](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/datasets\/usps_crosswalk.html)\n  - [Mapping Applications](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/mapping-applications.html)\n    - [Choice Neighborhoods](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/maps\/CN\/home.html)\n    - [Neighborhood Change Web Map](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/apps\/public\/usps\/ncwm-login)\n    - [Small DDAs and QCT](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/sadda\/sadda_qct.html)\n- QUICK LINKS\n  ### [QUICK LINKS](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/quicklinks.html)\n  - [Archives](http:\/\/archives.huduser.gov\/)\n  - [ConnectHome](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/connect-home.html)\n  - [Disaster Recovery](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/sandy.html \"Natural and Man-made Hazards\")\n  - [eBookstore](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/eBookStore.html)\n  - [FAQ](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/faq.html \"FAQ\")\n  - [First-time Visitor](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/firsttimevisit.html \"First Time Visitor?\")\n  - [Glossary](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/glossary\/glossary.html)\n  - [Guidelines for Preparing a Report for Publication](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/About\/style-guide-for-reports.pdf)\n  - [HUD Historical Timeline](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/hud_timeline\/)\n  - [HUD Regional Map](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/regions\/Regional.html)\n  - [HUD USER Forum](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/forums\/)\n  - [International and Philanthropic Affairs Division](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/ipad\/home.html)\n  - [Local Housing Assistance](https:\/\/www.hud.gov\/program_offices\/public_indian_housing\/pha\/contacts)\n  - [The Office of University Partnerships (OUP)](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/oup\/home.html)\n  - [Peer Review of Highly Influential Scientific Information](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/pdr_peer_review.html \"Peer Review Agenda of HUD Influential and Highly Influential Scientific Assessments\")\n  - [Programs of HUD](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/publications\/programs-of-hud.html)\n  - [Small Business Opportunities](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/news\/smallbusiness.html \"Small Business Opportunities\")\n  - [Research Partnerships](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/oup\/research_partnerships.html \"OUP | Research Partnerships\")\n  - [Social Networking](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/social_network.html)\n  - [Student Resources](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/student.html \"Student Resources\")\n  - [Subscribe](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/subscribe\/subscribe.html)\n  - [Webstore](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/webstore\/)\n- [EVENTS](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/events.html)\n\n## Breadcrumb\n1. [Home](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/)\n\n# Los Angeles, California: Small Lot Ordinance\n[Anchor Institutions](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/AnchorInstitutions.html)\n\n- [U.S. Virgin Islands Nonprofit Helps Community Focus on Disaster Recovery and Resiliency](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/study-042224.html)\n- [A Model for Community-Based Policing in Pittsburgh](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/study-052623.html)\n- [Click here for more](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/AnchorInstitutions.html)\n\n[Community Development](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/CommunityDev.html)\n\n- [MaineHousing Incentivizes Private-Sector Developers to Expand Homeownership Opportunities](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/study-040126.html)\n- [Missoula, Montana: Partnership Expands Affordable Housing Opportunities](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/study-112525.html)\n- [Click here for more](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/CommunityDev.html)\n\n[Senior Housing](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/SeniorHousing.html)\n\n- [Former School in Charleston, South Carolina, Transformed into Affordable Housing for Seniors](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/study-010825.html)\n- [Richmond, California: Rehabilitation of Vacant Public Housing Site Preserves Senior Housing](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/study-092424.html)\n- [Click here for more](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/SeniorHousing.html)\n\n[Supportive Housing](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/SupportiveHousing.html)\n\n- [Albuquerque, New Mexico: Affordable Housing Serves Deaf People and Families](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/study-072125.html)\n- [Yakima, Washington: An Adaptive Reuse Project Provides Supportive Housing for Formerly Homeless Veterans](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/study-022824.html)\n- [Click here for more](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/SupportiveHousing.html)\n\n[Sustainable Housing](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/SustainableHousing.html)\n\n- [Pacific Landing Provides Energy-Efficient Affordable Housing in Santa Monica, California](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/study-110124.html)\n- [Innovative Solar Technology Powers Affordable Housing in River Falls, Wisconsin](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/study-040824.html)\n- [Click here for more](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/SustainableHousing.html)\n\n[Zoning for Affordable Housing](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/Zon_AfforHousing.html)\n\n- [San Francisco, California: Inclusionary Zoning Expands the Below-Market-Rate Housing Stock](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/study-12162016.html)\n- [Addressing Homelessness with a Tiny-Home Village in Olympia, Washington](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/study_08312015_1.html)\n- [Click here for more](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/Zon_AfforHousing.html)\n\n![Case Studies](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/images\/bp_mobile_pic.png)\n\n[![](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/images\/rbc_casestudies\/LA-1.jpg)](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/images\/rbc_casestudies\/LA-1.jpg \"Site plan with three small lot units.  Credit: Cullen Street Homes — Small Lot Subdivision Project in Los Angeles, California.  Designed by Modative, Inc. Architects. Photo Courtesy: Modative, Inc. Architects.\")\n\n[![](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/images\/rbc_casestudies\/LA2.jpg)](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/images\/rbc_casestudies\/LA2.jpg \"Front-view rendering of small lot units.  Credit: Cullen Street Homes — Small Lot Subdivision Project in Los Angeles, California.  Designed by Modative, Inc. Architects. Photo Courtesy: Modative, Inc. Architects.\")\n\n[![](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/images\/rbc_casestudies\/LA-3.jpg)](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/images\/rbc_casestudies\/LA-3.jpg \"Rear-view rendering of small lot units.   Credit: Cullen Street Homes — Small Lot Subdivision Project in Los Angeles, California.  Designed by Modative, Inc. Architects. Photo Courtesy: Modative, Inc. Architects.\")\n\n[![](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/images\/rbc_casestudies\/LA-4.jpg)](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/images\/rbc_casestudies\/LA-4.jpg \"Side-view elevations of small lot units.   Credit: Cullen Street Homes — Small Lot Subdivision Project in Los Angeles, California.  Designed by Modative, Inc. Architects. Photo Courtesy: Modative, Inc. Architects.\")\n\n[![](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/images\/rbc_casestudies\/LA-5.jpg)](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/images\/rbc_casestudies\/LA-5.jpg \"First-level floor plans of small lot units.  Credit: Cullen Street Homes — Small Lot Subdivision Project in Los Angeles, California.  Designed by Modative, Inc. Architects. Photo Courtesy: Modative, Inc. Architects.\")\n\n[![](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/images\/rbc_casestudies\/LA-6.jpg)](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/images\/rbc_casestudies\/LA-6.jpg \"Second-level floor plans of small lot units.   Credit: Cullen Street Homes — Small Lot Subdivision Project in Los Angeles, California.  Designed by Modative, Inc. Architects. Photo Courtesy: Modative, Inc. Architects.\")\n\n[![](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/images\/rbc_casestudies\/LA-7.jpg)](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/images\/rbc_casestudies\/LA-7.jpg \"Third-level floor plans of small lot units.  Credit: Cullen Street Homes — Small Lot Subdivision Project in Los Angeles, California.  Designed by Modative, Inc. Architects. Photo Courtesy: Modative, Inc. Architects.\")\n\n[![](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/images\/rbc_casestudies\/LA-8.jpg)](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/images\/rbc_casestudies\/LA-8.jpg \"Aerial view of small lot unit development location.   Credit: Cullen Street Homes — Small Lot Subdivision Project in Los Angeles, California.  Designed by Modative, Inc. Architects. Photo Courtesy: Modative, Inc. Architects.\")\n\n[Home](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/) \\> [Case Studies](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/home.html) \\> Los Angeles, California: Small Lot Ordinance\n\n### Los Angeles, California: Small Lot Ordinance\nLos Angeles, dubbed the “City of Angels,” is the second-largest city in the United States. A multicultural city known as the hub of the entertainment industry and a center of arts, culture, and fashion, Los Angeles has suffered one of the most devastating economic recessions in the nation. Fueled by the California budget and housing crises, the [unemployment rate](http:\/\/www.bls.gov\/lau\/lacilg09.htm) in Los Angeles was 5.6 percent in 2007 and rose to 12.8 percent in 2009 — both figures above the national rate of 4.6 percent and 9.3 percent, respectively.\n\nIn 2009, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa’s office [reported](http:\/\/budget.lacity.org\/ask_questions.htm) that the city was suffering from declining home values, increasing foreclosure rates, and rising unemployment. New housing development suffered most. According to the city’s building permit valuation for residential construction, new housing construction dropped from more than \\$2.5 billion in 2007 to less than \\$1 billion in 2009. Despite the looming economic crisis, from 2000 to 2010, Los Angeles’ population increased by 9.8 percent (from 3.7 to 4.1 million). The city is beginning to show signs of economic recovery, but tightening lending practices have stalled new housing construction, adding to the city’s housing conundrum — a high demand for moderately priced housing at a time when government and industry limitations are at their peak. Housing developers are left with two possibilities: abandon housing projects or seek new and innovative ways to get projects off the ground. With the help of a 2005 city ordinance, several developers have pursued the latter option.\n\n###### Background\nIn 1999, the Los Angeles city council established the Housing Crisis Task Force in response to the city’s severe affordable housing shortage. In the months that followed, the task force released a report, [In Short Supply](http:\/\/www.ci.la.ca.us\/lahd\/shrtsup2k.PDF), to identify strategies aimed at alleviating the housing crisis. The report found that 372,000 housing units were overcrowded (102,000 of which were severely overcrowded), accounting for 30 percent of total housing units within the city. Thousands of affordable housing units were being demolished every year to make way for more luxurious homes, and the nearly built-out city did not have the land to accommodate new housing development. The task force strongly recommended increasing the availability and production of affordable housing through innovative land use strategies. One such strategy included facilitating affordable homeownership through a small lot program.\n\nIn November 2000, the city’s planning commission evaluated more than 60 proposals to increase production of affordable and market-rate housing. Twenty-five proposals were recommended for further study, including small lot development. The small lot program met the task force’s requirement that it increase homeownership opportunities through innovative land use. Under the program, the city would subdivide lots located within existing multifamily and commercial zones to develop fee-simple, detached townhomes that would not be required to be part of a homeowner’s association. These small lot or townhome units would allow buyers to own both the land and the structure, rather than just a percentage of shared space (as in a condominium project), making them more attractive to first-time buyers.\n\nAt the time the proposal was being reviewed, the city’s zoning code allowed for only the construction of apartments or condominiums in multifamily residential zones. Single-family homes were also allowed, but the minimum lot size requirement of approximately 5,000 square feet did not make detached housing a viable alternative for housing developers. In 2004, after years of examining and modifying the proposed code, the Los Angeles City Planning Department formally presented the City Council with a proposed ordinance to permit small lot housing. In 2005, the city passed the proposal into law.\n\n###### The Small Lot Subdivision (Townhome) Ordinance\nThe [Small Lot Subdivision (Townhome) Ordinance](http:\/\/cityplanning.lacity.org\/Code_Studies\/Housing\/Townhouse176354.pdf) is an amendment to the Los Angeles Municipal Code. The ordinance permits small lot developments in the form of detached townhouses. To accomplish this, the definition of “lots” was amended to specify that the 20-foot street frontage requirement would not apply to an approved small lot subdivision. Parking requirements were also amended; small lot developments are not required to provide parking spaces on the same lot, as is the case with all other residential zones, but are still required to provide two garaged parking spaces per unit. The ordinance also allows one parcel to be subdivided into a single home, a duplex, or a triplex, as long as the subdivision does not exceed the dwelling unit requirement established by the underlying zone.\n\nTo allow developers even more flexibility, the city chose to adopt minimum (rather than maximum) development standards. For example, the minimum lot width of a small lot could be 16 feet and the minimum lot area may be as small as 600 square feet. In addition, each lot is not subject to front, side, or rear yard setback requirements between each parcel. When abutting a parcel that is not a small lot subdivision, however, a 5-foot side yard is required. Primarily, the ordinance reduces minimum lot size and side yard requirements to allow for creative townhome developments. This ordinance extends to all multifamily and commercial zones, but does not apply to single-family zones.\n\n###### Design Guidelines\nThe [City of Los Angeles Small Lot Design Guidelines](http:\/\/cityplanning.lacity.org\/HousingInitiatives\/DesignGuidelines\/des.guide-tableofcontents.pdf) complement the adopted ordinance in promoting the design and creation of small lot housing with neighborhood compatibility in mind. The guidelines outline site organization and urban form, parking and driveways, building design and materials, and landscaping and access. Two themes are seen throughout the document: creative approaches to spatial complexities with innovative site layouts and high-quality design elements that enhance the overall character of the neighborhood. For example, builders and designers must consider where to place parking, driveways, and open space, all while taking into account the footprint of the townhouses and how they relate to street frontages and adjoining lots. Builders and designers must also ensure that small lot units in close proximity preserve residents’ privacy and allow adequate natural light and ventilation.\n\nThe Guidelines also illustrate how design elements can enhance the aesthetics of a neighborhood. For example, townhouses should be designed with variations in height and massing, not built out to the maximum volume allowed under the code. Townhouses that tower over surrounding properties can disrupt the overall quality of the street and public realm. Building design and materials requirements are more difficult to establish because of the area’s rich architectural diversity, but the Guidelines recommend that designers consider using materials found in adjacent properties to help small lot developments blend into the neighborhood. This consistency is required in all aspects of design and placement, from setbacks to grade level and entryways.\n\n###### Why Build Small Lot Developments?\nCities that continuously attract new residents must identify new housing options that will accommodate a financially diverse population. The following are several reasons why small lot developments are beneficial to build in today’s economy:\n\n**Small lot developments increase homeownership at reduced costs.** Small lot developments are fee-simple units that increase homeownership opportunities while working within existing land use designations. Because these units are fee-simple, homeowners acquire ownership of the housing structure, as well as the land on which it’s built. When the amount of land needed for housing construction is decreased, the savings in land costs can be passed on to the homebuyer.\n\n**Small lot developments increase housing production.** Although small lot developments do not technically increase zoning density, they are usually built on underutilized lots, thereby increasing the number of units made available to the public.\n\n**Small housing developments are not subject to monthly homeowners’ association (HOA) fees.** [HOAs](http:\/\/rismedia.com\/2009-11-09\/understanding-home-owners-association-fees\/) are corporations with formal bylaws created to maintain common areas within a certain development. Members are charged monthly fees ranging from \\$250 to \\$750 (depending on the area) to cover the cost of property management. Small lot developments are constructed without common walls or foundations and therefore do not require HOAs.\n\n**Small lot developments are easier to finance than condominium projects.** New housing development in Los Angeles has come to a standstill. Stringent lending practices and insurance liabilities have made condominium projects (which are usually targeted to median-income residents) nonexistent. An increase in construction [defect litigation](http:\/\/www.livableplaces.org\/policy\/townhouse.html) has forced condominium HOAs to require additional insurance that can cost more than \\$20,000 a unit. Because small lot developments do not require HOAs, they do not face mandatory additional insurance costs, which makes obtaining bank financing easier.\n\n###### How Can the Program Be Improved?\nAlthough the small lot ordinance has garnered much acclaim, implementing small lot developments can still be challenging for developers. First, subdividing land for small lot development can take up to a year (or longer), making the entitlement process complicated, time consuming, and costly. Small lot developments are subject to the [California Subdivision Map Act](http:\/\/www.dot.ca.gov\/hq\/row\/landsurveys\/Study_material\/Laws_Surveyors\/Subdivision_Map_Act_and_Division_3.pdf), and developers are required to provide additional information over and above the customary requirements for new subdivision or parcel map applications. The subdivision application must also include a maintenance association to maintain all common areas and proof of accessibility by the city’s Fire Department and the Bureau of Sanitation. One suggestion to remedy this issue, made by architects specializing in small lot development, is to involve the city in the entitlement process. Having the Los Angeles Housing Authority hold the property until the subdivision is approved could save thousands of dollars in accrued interest — savings that could be passed on to homebuyers.\n\nSecond, the language of the ordinance makes it difficult for small lot developers to apply the same standards from project to project. “In a city like Los Angeles, it’s difficult to apply citywide ordinances. Test areas are harder to come by because neighborhoods are very diverse. What works in one neighborhood would not necessarily work in another,” explains Jane Blumenfeld, Acting Deputy Director (retired) of the Los Angeles Department of Planning. Although the ordinance does not have detailed development standards, the design guidelines communicate a clear vision of how the completed project should appear. Creating a consistent approval process and establishing an architectural review board specifically for small lot developments may solve this problem.\n\nParking requirements are another limitation to small lot development. Minimum parking requirements that do not reflect actual need decrease affordability by increasing housing costs and reducing the amount of land available for housing. In this case, a project may or may not move forward because of the limitations induced by such requirements. A typical [parking space](http:\/\/www.nonprofithousing.org\/pdf_toolkits\/mythsandfacts.pdf) requires up to 300 square feet; the small lot ordinance generally requires that each unit provide two garaged parking spaces, further restricting the ability to build. Tailoring parking requirements to reflect the availability of transit options will promote compact, pedestrian-friendly, and affordable neighborhoods.\n\nFinally, a complicated permitting process can significantly delay projects. Developers applying for permits in the city of Los Angeles must go through approximately 17 steps and a number of multi-departmental approvals in order to obtain a final building permit. Additionally, a lack of communication between departments results in conflicting instructions, further delaying the approval process. A new plan, [*Build L.A.*](http:\/\/www.dailynews.com\/news\/ci_16660313), proposes to streamline construction permitting by assigning a city case manager to developers working on larger projects. The goal is to have one point of contact for each project; the proposal is meant to improve efficiency and transparency in the approval process.\n\nThe small lot ordinance still requires some revisions in order for it to more adequately serve its purpose, but with the down real estate market, this housing strategy has engendered a fair amount of curiosity. “We’ve seen an uptick in small lot interest over the last several months,” explains Derek Leavitt, AIA of [Modative](http:\/\/www.modative.com\/), an architectural firm based in Los Angeles that specializes in small lot development. “Many of these projects are developers with entitled, but unbuilt condominium projects that are no longer able to be financed. A few developers have come to us with these defunct unbuilt condo projects, with the hope of converting them into small lot subdivision projects. Although we are early on in the process of studying these conversions, we’re hopeful that small lot \\[development\\] can rescue some of these condo projects.”\n\n*The contents of this article are the views of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development or the U.S. Government.*\n\n[About PD\\&R](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/pdrabout.html)   \n  \n [PD\\&R Mission](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/mission_and_background.html)  \n [Organization Chart](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/org_charts.html)  \n [PD\\&R Events](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/events.html)  \n [PD\\&R Guidelines & Brochures](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/guidelines_and_brochures.html)  \n [HUD Secretary's Awards](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/secaward.html)  \n [Disclaimer of Liability and Endorsement](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/about\/disclaimer.html)\n\n[Reference](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/quicklinks.html)  \n  \n [Contact Us](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/pdrconta.html)  \n [First Time Visitor](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/firsttimevisit.html)  \n [HUD User eBookstore](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/eBookStore.html)  \n [HUD User Archives](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/archives\/)  \n [Webstore](http:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/webstore\/catalog\/index.php)\n\n[Research](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/research\/home.html)  \n  \n [Case Studies](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/home.html)  \n [Datasets](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/pdrdatas_landing.html)  \n [Periodicals](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/periodicals\/pdrperio.html)  \n [Regulatory Barriers Clearinghouse](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/rbc\/home.html)  \n [Research & Reports](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/reports\/home.html)\n\n***Note:*** Guidance documents, except when based on statutory or regulatory authority or law, do not have the force and effect of law and are not meant to bind the public in any way. Guidance documents are intended only to provide clarity to the public regarding existing requirements under the law or agency policies.\n\n[Accessibility](http:\/\/portal.hud.gov\/hudportal\/HUD?src=\/accessibility \"Accessibility\") \\| [Contact Info](http:\/\/portal.hud.gov\/hudportal\/HUD?src=\/contact \"Contact Info\") \\| [Privacy Policy](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/privacy-policy.html \"Privacy Policy\") \\| [FOIA](http:\/\/portal.hud.gov\/hudportal\/HUD?src=\/program_offices\/administration\/foia \"Freedom Of Information Act\") \\| [Web Management and Web Policies](http:\/\/portal.hud.gov\/hudportal\/HUD?src=\/library\/bookshelf11 \"Web Management and Web Policies\") \\| [Inspector General](https:\/\/www.hudoig.gov\/ \"Inspector General\") \\| [No Fear Act](http:\/\/portal.hud.gov\/hudportal\/HUD?src=\/program_offices\/eeo\/nofearactfy \"No Fear Act\") \\| [PaymentAccuracy.gov](http:\/\/www.paymentaccuracy.gov\/ \"PaymentAccuracy.gov\")\n\n![HUD User Social Media Icons](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/sites\/default\/files\/images2\/HU-FOOTER-LOGOS-2024.webp)\n\n**HUD USER**   \n P.O. Box 23268, Washington, DC 20026-3268   \n **Toll Free:** 1-800-245-2691\n\n**TDD:** 1-800-927-7589\n\n**Local:**\n\n1-703-964-0670\n\n**Fax:** 1-202-708-9981\n\n![HUD USER footer](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/images\/footer_logos_transparent_1.png)","attrs_readable_markdown":"[Home](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/) \\> [Case Studies](https:\/\/www.huduser.gov\/portal\/casestudies\/home.html) \\> Los Angeles, California: Small Lot Ordinance\n\n### Los Angeles, California: Small Lot Ordinance\nLos Angeles, dubbed the “City of Angels,” is the second-largest city in the United States. A multicultural city known as the hub of the entertainment industry and a center of arts, culture, and fashion, Los Angeles has suffered one of the most devastating economic recessions in the nation. Fueled by the California budget and housing crises, the [unemployment rate](http:\/\/www.bls.gov\/lau\/lacilg09.htm) in Los Angeles was 5.6 percent in 2007 and rose to 12.8 percent in 2009 — both figures above the national rate of 4.6 percent and 9.3 percent, respectively.\n\nIn 2009, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa’s office [reported](http:\/\/budget.lacity.org\/ask_questions.htm) that the city was suffering from declining home values, increasing foreclosure rates, and rising unemployment. New housing development suffered most. According to the city’s building permit valuation for residential construction, new housing construction dropped from more than \\$2.5 billion in 2007 to less than \\$1 billion in 2009. Despite the looming economic crisis, from 2000 to 2010, Los Angeles’ population increased by 9.8 percent (from 3.7 to 4.1 million). The city is beginning to show signs of economic recovery, but tightening lending practices have stalled new housing construction, adding to the city’s housing conundrum — a high demand for moderately priced housing at a time when government and industry limitations are at their peak. Housing developers are left with two possibilities: abandon housing projects or seek new and innovative ways to get projects off the ground. With the help of a 2005 city ordinance, several developers have pursued the latter option.\n\n###### Background\nIn 1999, the Los Angeles city council established the Housing Crisis Task Force in response to the city’s severe affordable housing shortage. In the months that followed, the task force released a report, [In Short Supply](http:\/\/www.ci.la.ca.us\/lahd\/shrtsup2k.PDF), to identify strategies aimed at alleviating the housing crisis. The report found that 372,000 housing units were overcrowded (102,000 of which were severely overcrowded), accounting for 30 percent of total housing units within the city. Thousands of affordable housing units were being demolished every year to make way for more luxurious homes, and the nearly built-out city did not have the land to accommodate new housing development. The task force strongly recommended increasing the availability and production of affordable housing through innovative land use strategies. One such strategy included facilitating affordable homeownership through a small lot program.\n\nIn November 2000, the city’s planning commission evaluated more than 60 proposals to increase production of affordable and market-rate housing. Twenty-five proposals were recommended for further study, including small lot development. The small lot program met the task force’s requirement that it increase homeownership opportunities through innovative land use. Under the program, the city would subdivide lots located within existing multifamily and commercial zones to develop fee-simple, detached townhomes that would not be required to be part of a homeowner’s association. These small lot or townhome units would allow buyers to own both the land and the structure, rather than just a percentage of shared space (as in a condominium project), making them more attractive to first-time buyers.\n\nAt the time the proposal was being reviewed, the city’s zoning code allowed for only the construction of apartments or condominiums in multifamily residential zones. Single-family homes were also allowed, but the minimum lot size requirement of approximately 5,000 square feet did not make detached housing a viable alternative for housing developers. In 2004, after years of examining and modifying the proposed code, the Los Angeles City Planning Department formally presented the City Council with a proposed ordinance to permit small lot housing. In 2005, the city passed the proposal into law.\n\n###### The Small Lot Subdivision (Townhome) Ordinance\nThe [Small Lot Subdivision (Townhome) Ordinance](http:\/\/cityplanning.lacity.org\/Code_Studies\/Housing\/Townhouse176354.pdf) is an amendment to the Los Angeles Municipal Code. The ordinance permits small lot developments in the form of detached townhouses. To accomplish this, the definition of “lots” was amended to specify that the 20-foot street frontage requirement would not apply to an approved small lot subdivision. Parking requirements were also amended; small lot developments are not required to provide parking spaces on the same lot, as is the case with all other residential zones, but are still required to provide two garaged parking spaces per unit. The ordinance also allows one parcel to be subdivided into a single home, a duplex, or a triplex, as long as the subdivision does not exceed the dwelling unit requirement established by the underlying zone.\n\nTo allow developers even more flexibility, the city chose to adopt minimum (rather than maximum) development standards. For example, the minimum lot width of a small lot could be 16 feet and the minimum lot area may be as small as 600 square feet. In addition, each lot is not subject to front, side, or rear yard setback requirements between each parcel. When abutting a parcel that is not a small lot subdivision, however, a 5-foot side yard is required. Primarily, the ordinance reduces minimum lot size and side yard requirements to allow for creative townhome developments. This ordinance extends to all multifamily and commercial zones, but does not apply to single-family zones.\n\n###### Design Guidelines\nThe [City of Los Angeles Small Lot Design Guidelines](http:\/\/cityplanning.lacity.org\/HousingInitiatives\/DesignGuidelines\/des.guide-tableofcontents.pdf) complement the adopted ordinance in promoting the design and creation of small lot housing with neighborhood compatibility in mind. The guidelines outline site organization and urban form, parking and driveways, building design and materials, and landscaping and access. Two themes are seen throughout the document: creative approaches to spatial complexities with innovative site layouts and high-quality design elements that enhance the overall character of the neighborhood. For example, builders and designers must consider where to place parking, driveways, and open space, all while taking into account the footprint of the townhouses and how they relate to street frontages and adjoining lots. Builders and designers must also ensure that small lot units in close proximity preserve residents’ privacy and allow adequate natural light and ventilation.\n\nThe Guidelines also illustrate how design elements can enhance the aesthetics of a neighborhood. For example, townhouses should be designed with variations in height and massing, not built out to the maximum volume allowed under the code. Townhouses that tower over surrounding properties can disrupt the overall quality of the street and public realm. Building design and materials requirements are more difficult to establish because of the area’s rich architectural diversity, but the Guidelines recommend that designers consider using materials found in adjacent properties to help small lot developments blend into the neighborhood. This consistency is required in all aspects of design and placement, from setbacks to grade level and entryways.\n\n###### Why Build Small Lot Developments?\nCities that continuously attract new residents must identify new housing options that will accommodate a financially diverse population. The following are several reasons why small lot developments are beneficial to build in today’s economy:\n\n**Small lot developments increase homeownership at reduced costs.** Small lot developments are fee-simple units that increase homeownership opportunities while working within existing land use designations. Because these units are fee-simple, homeowners acquire ownership of the housing structure, as well as the land on which it’s built. When the amount of land needed for housing construction is decreased, the savings in land costs can be passed on to the homebuyer.\n\n**Small lot developments increase housing production.** Although small lot developments do not technically increase zoning density, they are usually built on underutilized lots, thereby increasing the number of units made available to the public.\n\n**Small housing developments are not subject to monthly homeowners’ association (HOA) fees.** [HOAs](http:\/\/rismedia.com\/2009-11-09\/understanding-home-owners-association-fees\/) are corporations with formal bylaws created to maintain common areas within a certain development. Members are charged monthly fees ranging from \\$250 to \\$750 (depending on the area) to cover the cost of property management. Small lot developments are constructed without common walls or foundations and therefore do not require HOAs.\n\n**Small lot developments are easier to finance than condominium projects.** New housing development in Los Angeles has come to a standstill. Stringent lending practices and insurance liabilities have made condominium projects (which are usually targeted to median-income residents) nonexistent. An increase in construction [defect litigation](http:\/\/www.livableplaces.org\/policy\/townhouse.html) has forced condominium HOAs to require additional insurance that can cost more than \\$20,000 a unit. Because small lot developments do not require HOAs, they do not face mandatory additional insurance costs, which makes obtaining bank financing easier.\n\n###### How Can the Program Be Improved?\nAlthough the small lot ordinance has garnered much acclaim, implementing small lot developments can still be challenging for developers. First, subdividing land for small lot development can take up to a year (or longer), making the entitlement process complicated, time consuming, and costly. Small lot developments are subject to the [California Subdivision Map Act](http:\/\/www.dot.ca.gov\/hq\/row\/landsurveys\/Study_material\/Laws_Surveyors\/Subdivision_Map_Act_and_Division_3.pdf), and developers are required to provide additional information over and above the customary requirements for new subdivision or parcel map applications. The subdivision application must also include a maintenance association to maintain all common areas and proof of accessibility by the city’s Fire Department and the Bureau of Sanitation. One suggestion to remedy this issue, made by architects specializing in small lot development, is to involve the city in the entitlement process. Having the Los Angeles Housing Authority hold the property until the subdivision is approved could save thousands of dollars in accrued interest — savings that could be passed on to homebuyers.\n\nSecond, the language of the ordinance makes it difficult for small lot developers to apply the same standards from project to project. “In a city like Los Angeles, it’s difficult to apply citywide ordinances. Test areas are harder to come by because neighborhoods are very diverse. What works in one neighborhood would not necessarily work in another,” explains Jane Blumenfeld, Acting Deputy Director (retired) of the Los Angeles Department of Planning. Although the ordinance does not have detailed development standards, the design guidelines communicate a clear vision of how the completed project should appear. Creating a consistent approval process and establishing an architectural review board specifically for small lot developments may solve this problem.\n\nParking requirements are another limitation to small lot development. Minimum parking requirements that do not reflect actual need decrease affordability by increasing housing costs and reducing the amount of land available for housing. In this case, a project may or may not move forward because of the limitations induced by such requirements. A typical [parking space](http:\/\/www.nonprofithousing.org\/pdf_toolkits\/mythsandfacts.pdf) requires up to 300 square feet; the small lot ordinance generally requires that each unit provide two garaged parking spaces, further restricting the ability to build. Tailoring parking requirements to reflect the availability of transit options will promote compact, pedestrian-friendly, and affordable neighborhoods.\n\nFinally, a complicated permitting process can significantly delay projects. Developers applying for permits in the city of Los Angeles must go through approximately 17 steps and a number of multi-departmental approvals in order to obtain a final building permit. Additionally, a lack of communication between departments results in conflicting instructions, further delaying the approval process. A new plan, [*Build L.A.*](http:\/\/www.dailynews.com\/news\/ci_16660313), proposes to streamline construction permitting by assigning a city case manager to developers working on larger projects. The goal is to have one point of contact for each project; the proposal is meant to improve efficiency and transparency in the approval process.\n\nThe small lot ordinance still requires some revisions in order for it to more adequately serve its purpose, but with the down real estate market, this housing strategy has engendered a fair amount of curiosity. “We’ve seen an uptick in small lot interest over the last several months,” explains Derek Leavitt, AIA of [Modative](http:\/\/www.modative.com\/), an architectural firm based in Los Angeles that specializes in small lot development. “Many of these projects are developers with entitled, but unbuilt condominium projects that are no longer able to be financed. A few developers have come to us with these defunct unbuilt condo projects, with the hope of converting them into small lot subdivision projects. Although we are early on in the process of studying these conversions, we’re hopeful that small lot \\[development\\] can rescue some of these condo projects.”","meta_canonical":null}

3. Robots.txt Check

Query:

Response:

4. Spam/Ban Check

Query:

Response:

5. Seen Status Check

ℹ️ Skipped - page is already crawled

📄

INDEXABLE

✅

CRAWLED

1 day ago

🤖

ROBOTS ALLOWED

Page Info Filters

Filter	Status	Condition	Details
HTTP status	PASS	`download_http_code = 200`	HTTP 200
Age cutoff	PASS	`download_stamp > now() - 6 MONTH`	0 months ago
History drop	PASS	`isNull(history_drop_reason)`	No drop reason
Spam/ban	PASS	`fh_dont_index != 1 AND ml_spam_score = 0`	ml_spam_score=0
Canonical	PASS	`meta_canonical IS NULL OR = '' OR = src_unparsed`	Not set

Page Details

Property	Value
URL	https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/study_102011_1.html
Last Crawled	2026-04-10 05:51:33 (1 day ago)
First Indexed	2015-12-30 13:45:19 (10 years ago)
HTTP Status Code	200
Meta Title	Los Angeles, California: Small Lot Ordinance \| HUD USER
Meta Description	null
Meta Canonical	null
Boilerpipe Text	Home > Case Studies > Los Angeles, California: Small Lot Ordinance Los Angeles, California: Small Lot Ordinance Los Angeles, dubbed the “City of Angels,” is the second-largest city in the United States. A multicultural city known as the hub of the entertainment industry and a center of arts, culture, and fashion, Los Angeles has suffered one of the most devastating economic recessions in the nation. Fueled by the California budget and housing crises, the unemployment rate in Los Angeles was 5.6 percent in 2007 and rose to 12.8 percent in 2009 — both figures above the national rate of 4.6 percent and 9.3 percent, respectively. In 2009, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa’s office reported that the city was suffering from declining home values, increasing foreclosure rates, and rising unemployment. New housing development suffered most. According to the city’s building permit valuation for residential construction, new housing construction dropped from more than $2.5 billion in 2007 to less than $1 billion in 2009. Despite the looming economic crisis, from 2000 to 2010, Los Angeles’ population increased by 9.8 percent (from 3.7 to 4.1 million). The city is beginning to show signs of economic recovery, but tightening lending practices have stalled new housing construction, adding to the city’s housing conundrum — a high demand for moderately priced housing at a time when government and industry limitations are at their peak. Housing developers are left with two possibilities: abandon housing projects or seek new and innovative ways to get projects off the ground. With the help of a 2005 city ordinance, several developers have pursued the latter option. Background In 1999, the Los Angeles city council established the Housing Crisis Task Force in response to the city’s severe affordable housing shortage. In the months that followed, the task force released a report, In Short Supply , to identify strategies aimed at alleviating the housing crisis. The report found that 372,000 housing units were overcrowded (102,000 of which were severely overcrowded), accounting for 30 percent of total housing units within the city. Thousands of affordable housing units were being demolished every year to make way for more luxurious homes, and the nearly built-out city did not have the land to accommodate new housing development. The task force strongly recommended increasing the availability and production of affordable housing through innovative land use strategies. One such strategy included facilitating affordable homeownership through a small lot program. In November 2000, the city’s planning commission evaluated more than 60 proposals to increase production of affordable and market-rate housing. Twenty-five proposals were recommended for further study, including small lot development. The small lot program met the task force’s requirement that it increase homeownership opportunities through innovative land use. Under the program, the city would subdivide lots located within existing multifamily and commercial zones to develop fee-simple, detached townhomes that would not be required to be part of a homeowner’s association. These small lot or townhome units would allow buyers to own both the land and the structure, rather than just a percentage of shared space (as in a condominium project), making them more attractive to first-time buyers. At the time the proposal was being reviewed, the city’s zoning code allowed for only the construction of apartments or condominiums in multifamily residential zones. Single-family homes were also allowed, but the minimum lot size requirement of approximately 5,000 square feet did not make detached housing a viable alternative for housing developers. In 2004, after years of examining and modifying the proposed code, the Los Angeles City Planning Department formally presented the City Council with a proposed ordinance to permit small lot housing. In 2005, the city passed the proposal into law. The Small Lot Subdivision (Townhome) Ordinance The Small Lot Subdivision (Townhome) Ordinance is an amendment to the Los Angeles Municipal Code. The ordinance permits small lot developments in the form of detached townhouses. To accomplish this, the definition of “lots” was amended to specify that the 20-foot street frontage requirement would not apply to an approved small lot subdivision. Parking requirements were also amended; small lot developments are not required to provide parking spaces on the same lot, as is the case with all other residential zones, but are still required to provide two garaged parking spaces per unit. The ordinance also allows one parcel to be subdivided into a single home, a duplex, or a triplex, as long as the subdivision does not exceed the dwelling unit requirement established by the underlying zone. To allow developers even more flexibility, the city chose to adopt minimum (rather than maximum) development standards. For example, the minimum lot width of a small lot could be 16 feet and the minimum lot area may be as small as 600 square feet. In addition, each lot is not subject to front, side, or rear yard setback requirements between each parcel. When abutting a parcel that is not a small lot subdivision, however, a 5-foot side yard is required. Primarily, the ordinance reduces minimum lot size and side yard requirements to allow for creative townhome developments. This ordinance extends to all multifamily and commercial zones, but does not apply to single-family zones. Design Guidelines The City of Los Angeles Small Lot Design Guidelines complement the adopted ordinance in promoting the design and creation of small lot housing with neighborhood compatibility in mind. The guidelines outline site organization and urban form, parking and driveways, building design and materials, and landscaping and access. Two themes are seen throughout the document: creative approaches to spatial complexities with innovative site layouts and high-quality design elements that enhance the overall character of the neighborhood. For example, builders and designers must consider where to place parking, driveways, and open space, all while taking into account the footprint of the townhouses and how they relate to street frontages and adjoining lots. Builders and designers must also ensure that small lot units in close proximity preserve residents’ privacy and allow adequate natural light and ventilation. The Guidelines also illustrate how design elements can enhance the aesthetics of a neighborhood. For example, townhouses should be designed with variations in height and massing, not built out to the maximum volume allowed under the code. Townhouses that tower over surrounding properties can disrupt the overall quality of the street and public realm. Building design and materials requirements are more difficult to establish because of the area’s rich architectural diversity, but the Guidelines recommend that designers consider using materials found in adjacent properties to help small lot developments blend into the neighborhood. This consistency is required in all aspects of design and placement, from setbacks to grade level and entryways. Why Build Small Lot Developments? Cities that continuously attract new residents must identify new housing options that will accommodate a financially diverse population. The following are several reasons why small lot developments are beneficial to build in today’s economy: Small lot developments increase homeownership at reduced costs. Small lot developments are fee-simple units that increase homeownership opportunities while working within existing land use designations. Because these units are fee-simple, homeowners acquire ownership of the housing structure, as well as the land on which it’s built. When the amount of land needed for housing construction is decreased, the savings in land costs can be passed on to the homebuyer. Small lot developments increase housing production. Although small lot developments do not technically increase zoning density, they are usually built on underutilized lots, thereby increasing the number of units made available to the public. Small housing developments are not subject to monthly homeowners’ association (HOA) fees. HOAs are corporations with formal bylaws created to maintain common areas within a certain development. Members are charged monthly fees ranging from $250 to $750 (depending on the area) to cover the cost of property management. Small lot developments are constructed without common walls or foundations and therefore do not require HOAs. Small lot developments are easier to finance than condominium projects. New housing development in Los Angeles has come to a standstill. Stringent lending practices and insurance liabilities have made condominium projects (which are usually targeted to median-income residents) nonexistent. An increase in construction defect litigation has forced condominium HOAs to require additional insurance that can cost more than $20,000 a unit. Because small lot developments do not require HOAs, they do not face mandatory additional insurance costs, which makes obtaining bank financing easier. How Can the Program Be Improved? Although the small lot ordinance has garnered much acclaim, implementing small lot developments can still be challenging for developers. First, subdividing land for small lot development can take up to a year (or longer), making the entitlement process complicated, time consuming, and costly. Small lot developments are subject to the California Subdivision Map Act , and developers are required to provide additional information over and above the customary requirements for new subdivision or parcel map applications. The subdivision application must also include a maintenance association to maintain all common areas and proof of accessibility by the city’s Fire Department and the Bureau of Sanitation. One suggestion to remedy this issue, made by architects specializing in small lot development, is to involve the city in the entitlement process. Having the Los Angeles Housing Authority hold the property until the subdivision is approved could save thousands of dollars in accrued interest — savings that could be passed on to homebuyers. Second, the language of the ordinance makes it difficult for small lot developers to apply the same standards from project to project. “In a city like Los Angeles, it’s difficult to apply citywide ordinances. Test areas are harder to come by because neighborhoods are very diverse. What works in one neighborhood would not necessarily work in another,” explains Jane Blumenfeld, Acting Deputy Director (retired) of the Los Angeles Department of Planning. Although the ordinance does not have detailed development standards, the design guidelines communicate a clear vision of how the completed project should appear. Creating a consistent approval process and establishing an architectural review board specifically for small lot developments may solve this problem. Parking requirements are another limitation to small lot development. Minimum parking requirements that do not reflect actual need decrease affordability by increasing housing costs and reducing the amount of land available for housing. In this case, a project may or may not move forward because of the limitations induced by such requirements. A typical parking space requires up to 300 square feet; the small lot ordinance generally requires that each unit provide two garaged parking spaces, further restricting the ability to build. Tailoring parking requirements to reflect the availability of transit options will promote compact, pedestrian-friendly, and affordable neighborhoods. Finally, a complicated permitting process can significantly delay projects. Developers applying for permits in the city of Los Angeles must go through approximately 17 steps and a number of multi-departmental approvals in order to obtain a final building permit. Additionally, a lack of communication between departments results in conflicting instructions, further delaying the approval process. A new plan, Build L.A. , proposes to streamline construction permitting by assigning a city case manager to developers working on larger projects. The goal is to have one point of contact for each project; the proposal is meant to improve efficiency and transparency in the approval process. The small lot ordinance still requires some revisions in order for it to more adequately serve its purpose, but with the down real estate market, this housing strategy has engendered a fair amount of curiosity. “We’ve seen an uptick in small lot interest over the last several months,” explains Derek Leavitt, AIA of Modative , an architectural firm based in Los Angeles that specializes in small lot development. “Many of these projects are developers with entitled, but unbuilt condominium projects that are no longer able to be financed. A few developers have come to us with these defunct unbuilt condo projects, with the hope of converting them into small lot subdivision projects. Although we are early on in the process of studying these conversions, we’re hopeful that small lot [development] can rescue some of these condo projects.”
Markdown	[Skip to main content](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/study_102011_1.html#main-content) ![](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/themes/contrib/uswds_base_subtheme_bootstrap/assets/uswds/img/us_flag_small.png) An official website of the United States government Here's how you know Here's how you know ![Dot gov](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/themes/contrib/uswds_base_subtheme_bootstrap/assets/uswds/img/icon-dot-gov.svg) Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States. ![Https](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/themes/contrib/uswds_base_subtheme_bootstrap/assets/uswds/img/icon-https.svg) Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. [![HUD User Email Icon](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/sites/default/files/images/header-white-email-v2.png)](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/subscribe/subscribe.html) [![HUD User Forums Icon](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/sites/default/files/images/header-white-forums-v2.png)](https://www.huduser.gov/forums) [![HUD User Facebook Icon](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/sites/default/files/images/header-white-facebook-v2.png)](https://www.facebook.com/HUD-User-183685747712/) [![HUD Youtube Icon](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/sites/default/files/images/header-white-youtube-v2.png)](https://www.youtube.com/user/HUDchannel) [![HUD User X Icon](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/sites/default/files/images2/header-white-twitter-v2.png)](https://x.com/HUDUSERNEWS) [![HUD User Linkedin Icon](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/sites/default/files/images/footer-social-icons-linkedin-white-sqr.png)](https://www.linkedin.com/company/huduser) [![HUD Flicker Icon](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/sites/default/files/images/header-white-flickr-v2.png)](https://www.flickr.com/photos/hudopa/) [![HUD Instagram Icon](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/sites/default/files/images/header-white-instagram-v2.png)](https://instagram.com/hudgov) [Quicklinks](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/quicklinks.html) [Events](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/events.html) [Contact Us](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/pdrconta.html) [![Home](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/sites/default/files/HUDUser-HUGOV-Logo_1.png)](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/ "Home") [HUD USER](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/ "Home") Menu ![close](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/themes/contrib/uswds_base_subtheme_bootstrap/assets/uswds/img/usa-icons/close.svg) - ABOUT PD\&R ### [ABOUT PD\&R](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/pdrabout.html) [PD\&R Mission](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/mission_and_background.html) [Funding Opportunities](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/ota/funding-opportunities.html) [Biennial Reports](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/biennial.html) [Office/Division Descriptions](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/pdrdvsn_desc.html) [Organizational Chart](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/org_charts.html) [Field Economist Organizational Chart](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/field-economist-orgchart.html) [Brochures and Guides](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/guidelines_and_brochures.html) [Events](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/events.html) [PD\&R Jobs](https://www.usajobs.gov/Search/Results?a=HURR&p=1) [Innovative Housing Showcase](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/ihs.html) [Eviction Protection Grant Program](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/eviction-protection-grant.html) [IAH Student Design and Planning Competition](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/challenge/home.html) [International and Philanthropic Affairs Division](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/ipad/home.html) [Office of Technical Assistance](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/ota/homepage.html) [Office of the Chief Data Officer](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/ocdo/homepage.html) [HUD Secretary's Awards](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/secaward.html) [HUD History](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/history-of-hud.html) [HUD Evaluation Policy Statement](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/evaluation-policy.html) [Programs of HUD](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/publications/programs-of-hud.html) - RESEARCH & PUBLICATIONS ### [RESEARCH & PUBLICATIONS](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/publications/pdrpubli.html) [Reports and Publications](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/publications/pdrpubli.html) [Evidence Building](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/pdr_learningagenda.html "Learning Agenda & Research Roadmap") [Ongoing Research Activities](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/ongoing/homepage.html) [Research Centers of Excellence](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/msi/centers-of-excellence.html) [Research Partnerships](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/rp/home.html) [PD\&R Studies](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/publications/pdr_studies.html) [Other PD\&R Projects](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/other-pdr-projects.html) [U.S. Housing Market Conditions](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/ushmc/home.html "U.S. Housing Market Conditions") [Periodicals](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/periodicals/pdrperio.html) - [Cityscape](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/periodicals/cityscape.html "Cityscape") - [Evidence Matters](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/evidence.html "Evidence Matters") - [PD\&R Edge](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/pdredge/pdr_edge_home.html) - [Past Periodicals](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/periodicals/pastperio.html) [Case Studies](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/home.html) [Historical Reports](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/publications/pdrpubli/20thCentury.html) [Multidisciplinary Research Team](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/publications/mdrt_reports.html) [Webstore](https://www.huduser.gov/webstore/) [eBookstore](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/eBookStore.html) [Regulatory Barriers Clearinghouse](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/rbc/home.html) [Staff Working Papers](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/publications/workpapr.html) - DATASETS ### [DATASETS](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/pdrdatas_landing.html) [ACS-HUD Data Linkage](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/acs-hud-data-linkage.html) [American Housing Survey](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/ahs.html "American Housing Survey") [Data License for Access to Restricted Data](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/research/pdr_data-license.html) [Fair Market Rents](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/fmr.html) [Geospatial Data Resources](https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/) [Income Limits](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/il.html) [50th Percentile Rent Estimates](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/50per.html) [Consolidated Planning/CHAS Data](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/cp.html) [Dataset Update Schedule](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/update-schedule.html) [Low-Income Housing Tax Credit](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/lihtc.html) [NCHS - HUD Data Linkage](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/nchs-hud-data-linkage.html) [Picture of Subsidized Households](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/assthsg.html) [Public Use Microdata Sample](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/pumd/index.html) [Qualified Census Tracts and Difficult Development Areas](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/qct.html) [Special Tabulations of Households](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/spectabs.html) [State of the Cities Data Systems (SOCDS)](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/socds.html) [Components of Inventory Change (CINCH)](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/cinch.html) [USPS Vacancy Data](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/usps.html) [USPS Zip Code Crosswalk Files](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/usps_crosswalk.html) [Mapping Applications](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/mapping-applications.html) - [Choice Neighborhoods](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/maps/CN/home.html) - [Neighborhood Change Web Map](https://www.huduser.gov/apps/public/usps/ncwm-login) - [Small DDAs and QCT](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/sadda/sadda_qct.html) - QUICK LINKS ### [QUICK LINKS](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/quicklinks.html) [Archives](http://archives.huduser.gov/) [ConnectHome](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/connect-home.html) [Disaster Recovery](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/sandy.html "Natural and Man-made Hazards") [eBookstore](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/eBookStore.html) [FAQ](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/faq.html "FAQ") [First-time Visitor](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/firsttimevisit.html "First Time Visitor?") [Glossary](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/glossary/glossary.html) [Guidelines for Preparing a Report for Publication](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/About/style-guide-for-reports.pdf) [HUD Historical Timeline](https://www.huduser.gov/hud_timeline/) [HUD Regional Map](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/regions/Regional.html) [HUD USER Forum](https://www.huduser.gov/forums/) [International and Philanthropic Affairs Division](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/ipad/home.html) [Local Housing Assistance](https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/public_indian_housing/pha/contacts) [The Office of University Partnerships (OUP)](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/oup/home.html) [Peer Review of Highly Influential Scientific Information](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/pdr_peer_review.html "Peer Review Agenda of HUD Influential and Highly Influential Scientific Assessments") [Programs of HUD](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/publications/programs-of-hud.html) [Small Business Opportunities](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/news/smallbusiness.html "Small Business Opportunities") [Research Partnerships](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/oup/research_partnerships.html "OUP \| Research Partnerships") [Social Networking](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/social_network.html) [Student Resources](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/student.html "Student Resources") [Subscribe](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/subscribe/subscribe.html) [Webstore](https://www.huduser.gov/webstore/) - [EVENTS](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/events.html) - ABOUT PD\&R ### [ABOUT PD\&R](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/pdrabout.html) - [PD\&R Mission](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/mission_and_background.html) - [Funding Opportunities](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/ota/funding-opportunities.html) - [Biennial Reports](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/biennial.html) - [Office/Division Descriptions](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/pdrdvsn_desc.html) - [Organizational Chart](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/org_charts.html) - [Field Economist Organizational Chart](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/field-economist-orgchart.html) - [Brochures and Guides](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/guidelines_and_brochures.html) - [Events](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/events.html) - [PD\&R Jobs](https://www.usajobs.gov/Search/Results?a=HURR&p=1) - [Innovative Housing Showcase](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/ihs.html) - [Eviction Protection Grant Program](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/eviction-protection-grant.html) - [IAH Student Design and Planning Competition](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/challenge/home.html) - [International and Philanthropic Affairs Division](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/ipad/home.html) - [Office of Technical Assistance](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/ota/homepage.html) - [Office of the Chief Data Officer](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/ocdo/homepage.html) - [HUD Secretary's Awards](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/secaward.html) - [HUD History](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/history-of-hud.html) - [HUD Evaluation Policy Statement](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/evaluation-policy.html) - [Programs of HUD](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/publications/programs-of-hud.html) - RESEARCH & PUBLICATIONS ### [RESEARCH & PUBLICATIONS](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/publications/pdrpubli.html) - [Reports and Publications](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/publications/pdrpubli.html) - [Evidence Building](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/pdr_learningagenda.html "Learning Agenda & Research Roadmap") - [Ongoing Research Activities](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/ongoing/homepage.html) - [Research Centers of Excellence](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/msi/centers-of-excellence.html) - [Research Partnerships](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/rp/home.html) - [PD\&R Studies](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/publications/pdr_studies.html) - [Other PD\&R Projects](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/other-pdr-projects.html) - [U.S. Housing Market Conditions](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/ushmc/home.html "U.S. Housing Market Conditions") - [Periodicals](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/periodicals/pdrperio.html) - [Cityscape](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/periodicals/cityscape.html "Cityscape") - [Evidence Matters](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/evidence.html "Evidence Matters") - [PD\&R Edge](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/pdredge/pdr_edge_home.html) - [Past Periodicals](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/periodicals/pastperio.html) - [Case Studies](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/home.html) - [Historical Reports](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/publications/pdrpubli/20thCentury.html) - [Multidisciplinary Research Team](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/publications/mdrt_reports.html) - [Webstore](https://www.huduser.gov/webstore/) - [eBookstore](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/eBookStore.html) - [Regulatory Barriers Clearinghouse](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/rbc/home.html) - [Staff Working Papers](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/publications/workpapr.html) - DATASETS ### [DATASETS](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/pdrdatas_landing.html) - [ACS-HUD Data Linkage](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/acs-hud-data-linkage.html) - [American Housing Survey](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/ahs.html "American Housing Survey") - [Data License for Access to Restricted Data](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/research/pdr_data-license.html) - [Fair Market Rents](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/fmr.html) - [Geospatial Data Resources](https://hudgis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/) - [Income Limits](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/il.html) - [50th Percentile Rent Estimates](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/50per.html) - [Consolidated Planning/CHAS Data](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/cp.html) - [Dataset Update Schedule](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/update-schedule.html) - [Low-Income Housing Tax Credit](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/lihtc.html) - [NCHS - HUD Data Linkage](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/nchs-hud-data-linkage.html) - [Picture of Subsidized Households](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/assthsg.html) - [Public Use Microdata Sample](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/pumd/index.html) - [Qualified Census Tracts and Difficult Development Areas](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/qct.html) - [Special Tabulations of Households](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/spectabs.html) - [State of the Cities Data Systems (SOCDS)](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/socds.html) - [Components of Inventory Change (CINCH)](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/cinch.html) - [USPS Vacancy Data](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/usps.html) - [USPS Zip Code Crosswalk Files](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/usps_crosswalk.html) - [Mapping Applications](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/mapping-applications.html) - [Choice Neighborhoods](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/maps/CN/home.html) - [Neighborhood Change Web Map](https://www.huduser.gov/apps/public/usps/ncwm-login) - [Small DDAs and QCT](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/sadda/sadda_qct.html) - QUICK LINKS ### [QUICK LINKS](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/quicklinks.html) - [Archives](http://archives.huduser.gov/) - [ConnectHome](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/connect-home.html) - [Disaster Recovery](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/sandy.html "Natural and Man-made Hazards") - [eBookstore](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/eBookStore.html) - [FAQ](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/faq.html "FAQ") - [First-time Visitor](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/firsttimevisit.html "First Time Visitor?") - [Glossary](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/glossary/glossary.html) - [Guidelines for Preparing a Report for Publication](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/About/style-guide-for-reports.pdf) - [HUD Historical Timeline](https://www.huduser.gov/hud_timeline/) - [HUD Regional Map](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/regions/Regional.html) - [HUD USER Forum](https://www.huduser.gov/forums/) - [International and Philanthropic Affairs Division](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/ipad/home.html) - [Local Housing Assistance](https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/public_indian_housing/pha/contacts) - [The Office of University Partnerships (OUP)](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/oup/home.html) - [Peer Review of Highly Influential Scientific Information](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/pdr_peer_review.html "Peer Review Agenda of HUD Influential and Highly Influential Scientific Assessments") - [Programs of HUD](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/publications/programs-of-hud.html) - [Small Business Opportunities](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/news/smallbusiness.html "Small Business Opportunities") - [Research Partnerships](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/oup/research_partnerships.html "OUP \| Research Partnerships") - [Social Networking](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/social_network.html) - [Student Resources](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/student.html "Student Resources") - [Subscribe](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/subscribe/subscribe.html) - [Webstore](https://www.huduser.gov/webstore/) - [EVENTS](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/events.html) ## Breadcrumb 1. [Home](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/) # Los Angeles, California: Small Lot Ordinance [Anchor Institutions](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/AnchorInstitutions.html) - [U.S. Virgin Islands Nonprofit Helps Community Focus on Disaster Recovery and Resiliency](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/study-042224.html) - [A Model for Community-Based Policing in Pittsburgh](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/study-052623.html) - [Click here for more](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/AnchorInstitutions.html) [Community Development](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/CommunityDev.html) - [MaineHousing Incentivizes Private-Sector Developers to Expand Homeownership Opportunities](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/study-040126.html) - [Missoula, Montana: Partnership Expands Affordable Housing Opportunities](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/study-112525.html) - [Click here for more](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/CommunityDev.html) [Senior Housing](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/SeniorHousing.html) - [Former School in Charleston, South Carolina, Transformed into Affordable Housing for Seniors](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/study-010825.html) - [Richmond, California: Rehabilitation of Vacant Public Housing Site Preserves Senior Housing](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/study-092424.html) - [Click here for more](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/SeniorHousing.html) [Supportive Housing](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/SupportiveHousing.html) - [Albuquerque, New Mexico: Affordable Housing Serves Deaf People and Families](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/study-072125.html) - [Yakima, Washington: An Adaptive Reuse Project Provides Supportive Housing for Formerly Homeless Veterans](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/study-022824.html) - [Click here for more](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/SupportiveHousing.html) [Sustainable Housing](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/SustainableHousing.html) - [Pacific Landing Provides Energy-Efficient Affordable Housing in Santa Monica, California](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/study-110124.html) - [Innovative Solar Technology Powers Affordable Housing in River Falls, Wisconsin](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/study-040824.html) - [Click here for more](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/SustainableHousing.html) [Zoning for Affordable Housing](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/Zon_AfforHousing.html) - [San Francisco, California: Inclusionary Zoning Expands the Below-Market-Rate Housing Stock](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/study-12162016.html) - [Addressing Homelessness with a Tiny-Home Village in Olympia, Washington](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/study_08312015_1.html) - [Click here for more](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/Zon_AfforHousing.html) ![Case Studies](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/images/bp_mobile_pic.png) [![](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/images/rbc_casestudies/LA-1.jpg)](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/images/rbc_casestudies/LA-1.jpg "Site plan with three small lot units. Credit: Cullen Street Homes — Small Lot Subdivision Project in Los Angeles, California. Designed by Modative, Inc. Architects. Photo Courtesy: Modative, Inc. Architects.") [![](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/images/rbc_casestudies/LA2.jpg)](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/images/rbc_casestudies/LA2.jpg "Front-view rendering of small lot units. Credit: Cullen Street Homes — Small Lot Subdivision Project in Los Angeles, California. Designed by Modative, Inc. Architects. Photo Courtesy: Modative, Inc. Architects.") [![](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/images/rbc_casestudies/LA-3.jpg)](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/images/rbc_casestudies/LA-3.jpg "Rear-view rendering of small lot units. Credit: Cullen Street Homes — Small Lot Subdivision Project in Los Angeles, California. Designed by Modative, Inc. Architects. Photo Courtesy: Modative, Inc. Architects.") [![](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/images/rbc_casestudies/LA-4.jpg)](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/images/rbc_casestudies/LA-4.jpg "Side-view elevations of small lot units. Credit: Cullen Street Homes — Small Lot Subdivision Project in Los Angeles, California. Designed by Modative, Inc. Architects. Photo Courtesy: Modative, Inc. Architects.") [![](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/images/rbc_casestudies/LA-5.jpg)](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/images/rbc_casestudies/LA-5.jpg "First-level floor plans of small lot units. Credit: Cullen Street Homes — Small Lot Subdivision Project in Los Angeles, California. Designed by Modative, Inc. Architects. Photo Courtesy: Modative, Inc. Architects.") [![](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/images/rbc_casestudies/LA-6.jpg)](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/images/rbc_casestudies/LA-6.jpg "Second-level floor plans of small lot units. Credit: Cullen Street Homes — Small Lot Subdivision Project in Los Angeles, California. Designed by Modative, Inc. Architects. Photo Courtesy: Modative, Inc. Architects.") [![](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/images/rbc_casestudies/LA-7.jpg)](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/images/rbc_casestudies/LA-7.jpg "Third-level floor plans of small lot units. Credit: Cullen Street Homes — Small Lot Subdivision Project in Los Angeles, California. Designed by Modative, Inc. Architects. Photo Courtesy: Modative, Inc. Architects.") [![](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/images/rbc_casestudies/LA-8.jpg)](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/images/rbc_casestudies/LA-8.jpg "Aerial view of small lot unit development location. Credit: Cullen Street Homes — Small Lot Subdivision Project in Los Angeles, California. Designed by Modative, Inc. Architects. Photo Courtesy: Modative, Inc. Architects.") [Home](https://www.huduser.gov/) \> [Case Studies](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/home.html) \> Los Angeles, California: Small Lot Ordinance ### Los Angeles, California: Small Lot Ordinance Los Angeles, dubbed the “City of Angels,” is the second-largest city in the United States. A multicultural city known as the hub of the entertainment industry and a center of arts, culture, and fashion, Los Angeles has suffered one of the most devastating economic recessions in the nation. Fueled by the California budget and housing crises, the [unemployment rate](http://www.bls.gov/lau/lacilg09.htm) in Los Angeles was 5.6 percent in 2007 and rose to 12.8 percent in 2009 — both figures above the national rate of 4.6 percent and 9.3 percent, respectively. In 2009, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa’s office [reported](http://budget.lacity.org/ask_questions.htm) that the city was suffering from declining home values, increasing foreclosure rates, and rising unemployment. New housing development suffered most. According to the city’s building permit valuation for residential construction, new housing construction dropped from more than \$2.5 billion in 2007 to less than \$1 billion in 2009. Despite the looming economic crisis, from 2000 to 2010, Los Angeles’ population increased by 9.8 percent (from 3.7 to 4.1 million). The city is beginning to show signs of economic recovery, but tightening lending practices have stalled new housing construction, adding to the city’s housing conundrum — a high demand for moderately priced housing at a time when government and industry limitations are at their peak. Housing developers are left with two possibilities: abandon housing projects or seek new and innovative ways to get projects off the ground. With the help of a 2005 city ordinance, several developers have pursued the latter option. ###### Background In 1999, the Los Angeles city council established the Housing Crisis Task Force in response to the city’s severe affordable housing shortage. In the months that followed, the task force released a report, [In Short Supply](http://www.ci.la.ca.us/lahd/shrtsup2k.PDF), to identify strategies aimed at alleviating the housing crisis. The report found that 372,000 housing units were overcrowded (102,000 of which were severely overcrowded), accounting for 30 percent of total housing units within the city. Thousands of affordable housing units were being demolished every year to make way for more luxurious homes, and the nearly built-out city did not have the land to accommodate new housing development. The task force strongly recommended increasing the availability and production of affordable housing through innovative land use strategies. One such strategy included facilitating affordable homeownership through a small lot program. In November 2000, the city’s planning commission evaluated more than 60 proposals to increase production of affordable and market-rate housing. Twenty-five proposals were recommended for further study, including small lot development. The small lot program met the task force’s requirement that it increase homeownership opportunities through innovative land use. Under the program, the city would subdivide lots located within existing multifamily and commercial zones to develop fee-simple, detached townhomes that would not be required to be part of a homeowner’s association. These small lot or townhome units would allow buyers to own both the land and the structure, rather than just a percentage of shared space (as in a condominium project), making them more attractive to first-time buyers. At the time the proposal was being reviewed, the city’s zoning code allowed for only the construction of apartments or condominiums in multifamily residential zones. Single-family homes were also allowed, but the minimum lot size requirement of approximately 5,000 square feet did not make detached housing a viable alternative for housing developers. In 2004, after years of examining and modifying the proposed code, the Los Angeles City Planning Department formally presented the City Council with a proposed ordinance to permit small lot housing. In 2005, the city passed the proposal into law. ###### The Small Lot Subdivision (Townhome) Ordinance The [Small Lot Subdivision (Townhome) Ordinance](http://cityplanning.lacity.org/Code_Studies/Housing/Townhouse176354.pdf) is an amendment to the Los Angeles Municipal Code. The ordinance permits small lot developments in the form of detached townhouses. To accomplish this, the definition of “lots” was amended to specify that the 20-foot street frontage requirement would not apply to an approved small lot subdivision. Parking requirements were also amended; small lot developments are not required to provide parking spaces on the same lot, as is the case with all other residential zones, but are still required to provide two garaged parking spaces per unit. The ordinance also allows one parcel to be subdivided into a single home, a duplex, or a triplex, as long as the subdivision does not exceed the dwelling unit requirement established by the underlying zone. To allow developers even more flexibility, the city chose to adopt minimum (rather than maximum) development standards. For example, the minimum lot width of a small lot could be 16 feet and the minimum lot area may be as small as 600 square feet. In addition, each lot is not subject to front, side, or rear yard setback requirements between each parcel. When abutting a parcel that is not a small lot subdivision, however, a 5-foot side yard is required. Primarily, the ordinance reduces minimum lot size and side yard requirements to allow for creative townhome developments. This ordinance extends to all multifamily and commercial zones, but does not apply to single-family zones. ###### Design Guidelines The [City of Los Angeles Small Lot Design Guidelines](http://cityplanning.lacity.org/HousingInitiatives/DesignGuidelines/des.guide-tableofcontents.pdf) complement the adopted ordinance in promoting the design and creation of small lot housing with neighborhood compatibility in mind. The guidelines outline site organization and urban form, parking and driveways, building design and materials, and landscaping and access. Two themes are seen throughout the document: creative approaches to spatial complexities with innovative site layouts and high-quality design elements that enhance the overall character of the neighborhood. For example, builders and designers must consider where to place parking, driveways, and open space, all while taking into account the footprint of the townhouses and how they relate to street frontages and adjoining lots. Builders and designers must also ensure that small lot units in close proximity preserve residents’ privacy and allow adequate natural light and ventilation. The Guidelines also illustrate how design elements can enhance the aesthetics of a neighborhood. For example, townhouses should be designed with variations in height and massing, not built out to the maximum volume allowed under the code. Townhouses that tower over surrounding properties can disrupt the overall quality of the street and public realm. Building design and materials requirements are more difficult to establish because of the area’s rich architectural diversity, but the Guidelines recommend that designers consider using materials found in adjacent properties to help small lot developments blend into the neighborhood. This consistency is required in all aspects of design and placement, from setbacks to grade level and entryways. ###### Why Build Small Lot Developments? Cities that continuously attract new residents must identify new housing options that will accommodate a financially diverse population. The following are several reasons why small lot developments are beneficial to build in today’s economy: Small lot developments increase homeownership at reduced costs. Small lot developments are fee-simple units that increase homeownership opportunities while working within existing land use designations. Because these units are fee-simple, homeowners acquire ownership of the housing structure, as well as the land on which it’s built. When the amount of land needed for housing construction is decreased, the savings in land costs can be passed on to the homebuyer. Small lot developments increase housing production. Although small lot developments do not technically increase zoning density, they are usually built on underutilized lots, thereby increasing the number of units made available to the public. Small housing developments are not subject to monthly homeowners’ association (HOA) fees. [HOAs](http://rismedia.com/2009-11-09/understanding-home-owners-association-fees/) are corporations with formal bylaws created to maintain common areas within a certain development. Members are charged monthly fees ranging from \$250 to \$750 (depending on the area) to cover the cost of property management. Small lot developments are constructed without common walls or foundations and therefore do not require HOAs. Small lot developments are easier to finance than condominium projects. New housing development in Los Angeles has come to a standstill. Stringent lending practices and insurance liabilities have made condominium projects (which are usually targeted to median-income residents) nonexistent. An increase in construction [defect litigation](http://www.livableplaces.org/policy/townhouse.html) has forced condominium HOAs to require additional insurance that can cost more than \$20,000 a unit. Because small lot developments do not require HOAs, they do not face mandatory additional insurance costs, which makes obtaining bank financing easier. ###### How Can the Program Be Improved? Although the small lot ordinance has garnered much acclaim, implementing small lot developments can still be challenging for developers. First, subdividing land for small lot development can take up to a year (or longer), making the entitlement process complicated, time consuming, and costly. Small lot developments are subject to the [California Subdivision Map Act](http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/row/landsurveys/Study_material/Laws_Surveyors/Subdivision_Map_Act_and_Division_3.pdf), and developers are required to provide additional information over and above the customary requirements for new subdivision or parcel map applications. The subdivision application must also include a maintenance association to maintain all common areas and proof of accessibility by the city’s Fire Department and the Bureau of Sanitation. One suggestion to remedy this issue, made by architects specializing in small lot development, is to involve the city in the entitlement process. Having the Los Angeles Housing Authority hold the property until the subdivision is approved could save thousands of dollars in accrued interest — savings that could be passed on to homebuyers. Second, the language of the ordinance makes it difficult for small lot developers to apply the same standards from project to project. “In a city like Los Angeles, it’s difficult to apply citywide ordinances. Test areas are harder to come by because neighborhoods are very diverse. What works in one neighborhood would not necessarily work in another,” explains Jane Blumenfeld, Acting Deputy Director (retired) of the Los Angeles Department of Planning. Although the ordinance does not have detailed development standards, the design guidelines communicate a clear vision of how the completed project should appear. Creating a consistent approval process and establishing an architectural review board specifically for small lot developments may solve this problem. Parking requirements are another limitation to small lot development. Minimum parking requirements that do not reflect actual need decrease affordability by increasing housing costs and reducing the amount of land available for housing. In this case, a project may or may not move forward because of the limitations induced by such requirements. A typical [parking space](http://www.nonprofithousing.org/pdf_toolkits/mythsandfacts.pdf) requires up to 300 square feet; the small lot ordinance generally requires that each unit provide two garaged parking spaces, further restricting the ability to build. Tailoring parking requirements to reflect the availability of transit options will promote compact, pedestrian-friendly, and affordable neighborhoods. Finally, a complicated permitting process can significantly delay projects. Developers applying for permits in the city of Los Angeles must go through approximately 17 steps and a number of multi-departmental approvals in order to obtain a final building permit. Additionally, a lack of communication between departments results in conflicting instructions, further delaying the approval process. A new plan, [Build L.A.](http://www.dailynews.com/news/ci_16660313), proposes to streamline construction permitting by assigning a city case manager to developers working on larger projects. The goal is to have one point of contact for each project; the proposal is meant to improve efficiency and transparency in the approval process. The small lot ordinance still requires some revisions in order for it to more adequately serve its purpose, but with the down real estate market, this housing strategy has engendered a fair amount of curiosity. “We’ve seen an uptick in small lot interest over the last several months,” explains Derek Leavitt, AIA of [Modative](http://www.modative.com/), an architectural firm based in Los Angeles that specializes in small lot development. “Many of these projects are developers with entitled, but unbuilt condominium projects that are no longer able to be financed. A few developers have come to us with these defunct unbuilt condo projects, with the hope of converting them into small lot subdivision projects. Although we are early on in the process of studying these conversions, we’re hopeful that small lot \[development\] can rescue some of these condo projects.” The contents of this article are the views of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development or the U.S. Government. [About PD\&R](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/pdrabout.html) [PD\&R Mission](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/mission_and_background.html) [Organization Chart](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/org_charts.html) [PD\&R Events](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/events.html) [PD\&R Guidelines & Brochures](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/guidelines_and_brochures.html) [HUD Secretary's Awards](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/secaward.html) [Disclaimer of Liability and Endorsement](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/about/disclaimer.html) [Reference](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/quicklinks.html) [Contact Us](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/pdrconta.html) [First Time Visitor](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/firsttimevisit.html) [HUD User eBookstore](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/eBookStore.html) [HUD User Archives](https://www.huduser.gov/archives/) [Webstore](http://www.huduser.gov/webstore/catalog/index.php) [Research](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/research/home.html) [Case Studies](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/home.html) [Datasets](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/pdrdatas_landing.html) [Periodicals](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/periodicals/pdrperio.html) [Regulatory Barriers Clearinghouse](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/rbc/home.html) [Research & Reports](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/reports/home.html) *Note:* Guidance documents, except when based on statutory or regulatory authority or law, do not have the force and effect of law and are not meant to bind the public in any way. Guidance documents are intended only to provide clarity to the public regarding existing requirements under the law or agency policies. [Accessibility](http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/accessibility "Accessibility") \\| [Contact Info](http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/contact "Contact Info") \\| [Privacy Policy](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/privacy-policy.html "Privacy Policy") \\| [FOIA](http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/administration/foia "Freedom Of Information Act") \\| [Web Management and Web Policies](http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/library/bookshelf11 "Web Management and Web Policies") \\| [Inspector General](https://www.hudoig.gov/ "Inspector General") \\| [No Fear Act](http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/eeo/nofearactfy "No Fear Act") \\| [PaymentAccuracy.gov](http://www.paymentaccuracy.gov/ "PaymentAccuracy.gov") ![HUD User Social Media Icons](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/sites/default/files/images2/HU-FOOTER-LOGOS-2024.webp) HUD USER P.O. Box 23268, Washington, DC 20026-3268 Toll Free: 1-800-245-2691 TDD: 1-800-927-7589 Local: 1-703-964-0670 Fax: 1-202-708-9981 ![HUD USER footer](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/images/footer_logos_transparent_1.png)
Readable Markdown	[Home](https://www.huduser.gov/) \> [Case Studies](https://www.huduser.gov/portal/casestudies/home.html) \> Los Angeles, California: Small Lot Ordinance ### Los Angeles, California: Small Lot Ordinance Los Angeles, dubbed the “City of Angels,” is the second-largest city in the United States. A multicultural city known as the hub of the entertainment industry and a center of arts, culture, and fashion, Los Angeles has suffered one of the most devastating economic recessions in the nation. Fueled by the California budget and housing crises, the [unemployment rate](http://www.bls.gov/lau/lacilg09.htm) in Los Angeles was 5.6 percent in 2007 and rose to 12.8 percent in 2009 — both figures above the national rate of 4.6 percent and 9.3 percent, respectively. In 2009, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa’s office [reported](http://budget.lacity.org/ask_questions.htm) that the city was suffering from declining home values, increasing foreclosure rates, and rising unemployment. New housing development suffered most. According to the city’s building permit valuation for residential construction, new housing construction dropped from more than \$2.5 billion in 2007 to less than \$1 billion in 2009. Despite the looming economic crisis, from 2000 to 2010, Los Angeles’ population increased by 9.8 percent (from 3.7 to 4.1 million). The city is beginning to show signs of economic recovery, but tightening lending practices have stalled new housing construction, adding to the city’s housing conundrum — a high demand for moderately priced housing at a time when government and industry limitations are at their peak. Housing developers are left with two possibilities: abandon housing projects or seek new and innovative ways to get projects off the ground. With the help of a 2005 city ordinance, several developers have pursued the latter option. ###### Background In 1999, the Los Angeles city council established the Housing Crisis Task Force in response to the city’s severe affordable housing shortage. In the months that followed, the task force released a report, [In Short Supply](http://www.ci.la.ca.us/lahd/shrtsup2k.PDF), to identify strategies aimed at alleviating the housing crisis. The report found that 372,000 housing units were overcrowded (102,000 of which were severely overcrowded), accounting for 30 percent of total housing units within the city. Thousands of affordable housing units were being demolished every year to make way for more luxurious homes, and the nearly built-out city did not have the land to accommodate new housing development. The task force strongly recommended increasing the availability and production of affordable housing through innovative land use strategies. One such strategy included facilitating affordable homeownership through a small lot program. In November 2000, the city’s planning commission evaluated more than 60 proposals to increase production of affordable and market-rate housing. Twenty-five proposals were recommended for further study, including small lot development. The small lot program met the task force’s requirement that it increase homeownership opportunities through innovative land use. Under the program, the city would subdivide lots located within existing multifamily and commercial zones to develop fee-simple, detached townhomes that would not be required to be part of a homeowner’s association. These small lot or townhome units would allow buyers to own both the land and the structure, rather than just a percentage of shared space (as in a condominium project), making them more attractive to first-time buyers. At the time the proposal was being reviewed, the city’s zoning code allowed for only the construction of apartments or condominiums in multifamily residential zones. Single-family homes were also allowed, but the minimum lot size requirement of approximately 5,000 square feet did not make detached housing a viable alternative for housing developers. In 2004, after years of examining and modifying the proposed code, the Los Angeles City Planning Department formally presented the City Council with a proposed ordinance to permit small lot housing. In 2005, the city passed the proposal into law. ###### The Small Lot Subdivision (Townhome) Ordinance The [Small Lot Subdivision (Townhome) Ordinance](http://cityplanning.lacity.org/Code_Studies/Housing/Townhouse176354.pdf) is an amendment to the Los Angeles Municipal Code. The ordinance permits small lot developments in the form of detached townhouses. To accomplish this, the definition of “lots” was amended to specify that the 20-foot street frontage requirement would not apply to an approved small lot subdivision. Parking requirements were also amended; small lot developments are not required to provide parking spaces on the same lot, as is the case with all other residential zones, but are still required to provide two garaged parking spaces per unit. The ordinance also allows one parcel to be subdivided into a single home, a duplex, or a triplex, as long as the subdivision does not exceed the dwelling unit requirement established by the underlying zone. To allow developers even more flexibility, the city chose to adopt minimum (rather than maximum) development standards. For example, the minimum lot width of a small lot could be 16 feet and the minimum lot area may be as small as 600 square feet. In addition, each lot is not subject to front, side, or rear yard setback requirements between each parcel. When abutting a parcel that is not a small lot subdivision, however, a 5-foot side yard is required. Primarily, the ordinance reduces minimum lot size and side yard requirements to allow for creative townhome developments. This ordinance extends to all multifamily and commercial zones, but does not apply to single-family zones. ###### Design Guidelines The [City of Los Angeles Small Lot Design Guidelines](http://cityplanning.lacity.org/HousingInitiatives/DesignGuidelines/des.guide-tableofcontents.pdf) complement the adopted ordinance in promoting the design and creation of small lot housing with neighborhood compatibility in mind. The guidelines outline site organization and urban form, parking and driveways, building design and materials, and landscaping and access. Two themes are seen throughout the document: creative approaches to spatial complexities with innovative site layouts and high-quality design elements that enhance the overall character of the neighborhood. For example, builders and designers must consider where to place parking, driveways, and open space, all while taking into account the footprint of the townhouses and how they relate to street frontages and adjoining lots. Builders and designers must also ensure that small lot units in close proximity preserve residents’ privacy and allow adequate natural light and ventilation. The Guidelines also illustrate how design elements can enhance the aesthetics of a neighborhood. For example, townhouses should be designed with variations in height and massing, not built out to the maximum volume allowed under the code. Townhouses that tower over surrounding properties can disrupt the overall quality of the street and public realm. Building design and materials requirements are more difficult to establish because of the area’s rich architectural diversity, but the Guidelines recommend that designers consider using materials found in adjacent properties to help small lot developments blend into the neighborhood. This consistency is required in all aspects of design and placement, from setbacks to grade level and entryways. ###### Why Build Small Lot Developments? Cities that continuously attract new residents must identify new housing options that will accommodate a financially diverse population. The following are several reasons why small lot developments are beneficial to build in today’s economy: Small lot developments increase homeownership at reduced costs. Small lot developments are fee-simple units that increase homeownership opportunities while working within existing land use designations. Because these units are fee-simple, homeowners acquire ownership of the housing structure, as well as the land on which it’s built. When the amount of land needed for housing construction is decreased, the savings in land costs can be passed on to the homebuyer. Small lot developments increase housing production. Although small lot developments do not technically increase zoning density, they are usually built on underutilized lots, thereby increasing the number of units made available to the public. Small housing developments are not subject to monthly homeowners’ association (HOA) fees. [HOAs](http://rismedia.com/2009-11-09/understanding-home-owners-association-fees/) are corporations with formal bylaws created to maintain common areas within a certain development. Members are charged monthly fees ranging from \$250 to \$750 (depending on the area) to cover the cost of property management. Small lot developments are constructed without common walls or foundations and therefore do not require HOAs. Small lot developments are easier to finance than condominium projects. New housing development in Los Angeles has come to a standstill. Stringent lending practices and insurance liabilities have made condominium projects (which are usually targeted to median-income residents) nonexistent. An increase in construction [defect litigation](http://www.livableplaces.org/policy/townhouse.html) has forced condominium HOAs to require additional insurance that can cost more than \$20,000 a unit. Because small lot developments do not require HOAs, they do not face mandatory additional insurance costs, which makes obtaining bank financing easier. ###### How Can the Program Be Improved? Although the small lot ordinance has garnered much acclaim, implementing small lot developments can still be challenging for developers. First, subdividing land for small lot development can take up to a year (or longer), making the entitlement process complicated, time consuming, and costly. Small lot developments are subject to the [California Subdivision Map Act](http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/row/landsurveys/Study_material/Laws_Surveyors/Subdivision_Map_Act_and_Division_3.pdf), and developers are required to provide additional information over and above the customary requirements for new subdivision or parcel map applications. The subdivision application must also include a maintenance association to maintain all common areas and proof of accessibility by the city’s Fire Department and the Bureau of Sanitation. One suggestion to remedy this issue, made by architects specializing in small lot development, is to involve the city in the entitlement process. Having the Los Angeles Housing Authority hold the property until the subdivision is approved could save thousands of dollars in accrued interest — savings that could be passed on to homebuyers. Second, the language of the ordinance makes it difficult for small lot developers to apply the same standards from project to project. “In a city like Los Angeles, it’s difficult to apply citywide ordinances. Test areas are harder to come by because neighborhoods are very diverse. What works in one neighborhood would not necessarily work in another,” explains Jane Blumenfeld, Acting Deputy Director (retired) of the Los Angeles Department of Planning. Although the ordinance does not have detailed development standards, the design guidelines communicate a clear vision of how the completed project should appear. Creating a consistent approval process and establishing an architectural review board specifically for small lot developments may solve this problem. Parking requirements are another limitation to small lot development. Minimum parking requirements that do not reflect actual need decrease affordability by increasing housing costs and reducing the amount of land available for housing. In this case, a project may or may not move forward because of the limitations induced by such requirements. A typical [parking space](http://www.nonprofithousing.org/pdf_toolkits/mythsandfacts.pdf) requires up to 300 square feet; the small lot ordinance generally requires that each unit provide two garaged parking spaces, further restricting the ability to build. Tailoring parking requirements to reflect the availability of transit options will promote compact, pedestrian-friendly, and affordable neighborhoods. Finally, a complicated permitting process can significantly delay projects. Developers applying for permits in the city of Los Angeles must go through approximately 17 steps and a number of multi-departmental approvals in order to obtain a final building permit. Additionally, a lack of communication between departments results in conflicting instructions, further delaying the approval process. A new plan, [Build L.A.](http://www.dailynews.com/news/ci_16660313), proposes to streamline construction permitting by assigning a city case manager to developers working on larger projects. The goal is to have one point of contact for each project; the proposal is meant to improve efficiency and transparency in the approval process. The small lot ordinance still requires some revisions in order for it to more adequately serve its purpose, but with the down real estate market, this housing strategy has engendered a fair amount of curiosity. “We’ve seen an uptick in small lot interest over the last several months,” explains Derek Leavitt, AIA of [Modative](http://www.modative.com/), an architectural firm based in Los Angeles that specializes in small lot development. “Many of these projects are developers with entitled, but unbuilt condominium projects that are no longer able to be financed. A few developers have come to us with these defunct unbuilt condo projects, with the hope of converting them into small lot subdivision projects. Although we are early on in the process of studying these conversions, we’re hopeful that small lot \[development\] can rescue some of these condo projects.”
Shard	151 (laksa)
Root Hash	8932665093783123951
Unparsed URL	gov,huduser!www,/portal/casestudies/study_102011_1.html s443