âšď¸ Skipped - page is already crawled
| Filter | Status | Condition | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| HTTP status | PASS | download_http_code = 200 | HTTP 200 |
| Age cutoff | PASS | download_stamp > now() - 6 MONTH | 0.1 months ago |
| History drop | PASS | isNull(history_drop_reason) | No drop reason |
| Spam/ban | PASS | fh_dont_index != 1 AND ml_spam_score = 0 | ml_spam_score=0 |
| Canonical | PASS | meta_canonical IS NULL OR = '' OR = src_unparsed | Not set |
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| URL | https://www.governing.com/context/the-history-of-fake-news-from-george-washington-to-donald-trump |
| Last Crawled | 2026-04-13 12:12:24 (4 days ago) |
| First Indexed | 2021-12-08 06:10:46 (4 years ago) |
| HTTP Status Code | 200 |
| Meta Title | The History of Fake News from George Washington to Donald Trump |
| Meta Description | Misinformation is a political game that has been played for more than 200 years between presidents and the press. While the tools have changed over the years, the tactics of rumors, attacks and lies remain the same. |
| Meta Canonical | null |
| Boilerpipe Text | Thatâs the difference between today and the founding generation. Eighteenth-century readers and consumers of news understood their subscriptions were intensely partisan. Many Americans today are unable to tell the difference.
In January 2017, then-President Trump called CNN â
fake news
â and the term quickly became synonymous with his administrationâs disingenuous attacks on the media. The increasing partisan divide over the last four years has only exacerbated the proliferation of false information and bad-faith attacks on media organizations. While disinformation is rife and a dangerous threat to the health of our republic, this problem is not a new one. From the nationâs earliest days, presidents have grappled with fake news. The only difference is that bad actors today have many more tools at their disposal.
As factional differences solidified during George Washingtonâs first term as president, opposition newspapers began printing criticism, which increased in volume during his second term. He regularly complained of the newspaper treatment to friends and colleagues, especially when the papers printed outright lies.
During the Revolution, British forces
forged letters
from Washington claiming the war was a mistake. Toward the end of his presidency, the letters resurfaced. Washingtonâs enemies claimed the correspondence had been taken from William Lee, Washingtonâs enslaved valet, when Lee was captured by the British. There was only one problem â Lee never left Washingtonâs side during the war. While Washington ignored the letters in the 1770s, he could not remain silent two decades later. He wrote a
fact-check letter
and asked Secretary of State Timothy Pickering to file it in the state department archives.
But facts and evidence couldnât stop his opponents and opposition newspapers kept up their trouble through the 1796 election. After John Adams was elected, the editors reluctantly conceded that John Adams would be better than his predecessor because Washington was a murderer. Washington was many things, but murderer was probably not one of them.
The pro-administration Federalist newspapers werenât much better. During the 1800 presidential election campaign, they warned readers to
bury their bibles
. If Thomas Jefferson won, they continued, he would wage a war on religion and confiscate their treasured family volumes. Jefferson had no such plans and his election precipitated no war on Christianity.
Many other elections in the early decades of the U.S. were plagued by false accusations. In 1828, supporters of John Quincy Adams put forth rumors that
Rachel Jackson
was a woman of ill-repute. Rachel died of a heart attack just before Andrew Jackson moved to the White House. He believed that the rumors had hurried her into an early grave and he never forgave his enemies.
While presidents of all political stripes were annoyed by the fake news, no one was surprised by the vitriol printed in the papers. Readers understood which papers were pro-Federalist, which papers were pro-Republican, and which papers tended toward a more neutral stand. For example, in 1796, as President Washington prepared his
Farewell Address
, he explicitly selected
Claypooleâs Daily Advertiser
because it avoided the political excesses of the
Aurora General Advertiser
or the
Gazette of the United States.
He wished the message to be read in as neutral a light as possible and chose the venue accordingly.
The role of the press in presidential elections began to evolve in the late 19th century with the emergence of a journalistic ethos that prized the pursuit of truth and a professionalism in reporting. Universities created journalism programs to teach standards and best practices, and journalism gained status as a respected career.
These shifts produced landmark reporting of corruption, crime, scandal and more. For example, the â
muckrakers
â were a group of serious journalists that published books and magazine articles about coal mine conditions, political corruption, trusts and monopolies, the meat packing industry, race riots and more. Their persuasive articles led to many reforms during the Progressive Era, including regulations of trusts, pollution, working conditions, and food and product safety.
Other famous examples of professional journalism include the
Pentagon Papers
, which revealed the extent of President Lyndon Johnsonâs lies and misinformation about the war in Vietnam, and the investigation into the Watergate scandal which ultimately led to President Richard Nixonâs resignation.
To be sure, presidents werenât always pleased that enterprising journalists dug up damaging information about their activities. President Nixon despised the press, threatened lawsuits whenever a paper printed âTricky Dick,â and reportedly told his adviser Henry Kissinger
ânever forget, the press is the enemy, the press is the enemyâŚwrite that on the blackboard 100 times.â
On the other hand, some journalists protected presidents from scandal. The press notoriously turned a blind eye to John F. Kennedyâs public philandering and
reporters rarely mentioned
that Franklin D. Roosevelt was mostly confined to a wheelchair.
President Trump therefore served as a break with presidential tradition. Unlike previous presidents that grudgingly accepted the role of investigative journalism, Trump regularly accused mainstream media outlets of spreading fake news stories, while serving, along with his supporters, as one of the most prolific creators of disinformation. That information is then amplified by his allies and international actors hoping to capitalize on chaos in the United States.
Trumpâs disinformation efforts enjoyed success for two reasons: Fox News and social media. First, Fox News was the first news channel in many decades that intentionally pursued a political agenda. While viewers may have perceived political bias in reporting at national news networks like NBC, CBS or CNN, Fox was the first to shape its content to support a political party from the top down.
Second, the rise of social media exploited users without the media literacy to discern truth from dis- or misinformation. Many older users expected social media sites to follow the same guidelines and practices employed by the traditional news sources that they had grown up reading. When social media, especially Facebook, accelerated the spread of false information, these viewers were unable to tell the difference. They believed they could trust what was published. They canât. |
| Markdown | - [Policy](https://www.governing.com/policy)
- [Management](https://www.governing.com/management-and-administration)
- [Finance](https://www.governing.com/finance)
- More News Topics
- [Housing and Urban Issues](https://www.governing.com/urban)
- [Infrastructure](https://www.governing.com/infrastructure)
- [Policy Spotlight: AI](https://www.governing.com/artificial-intelligence)
- [Politics](https://www.governing.com/politics)
- [Resilience](https://www.governing.com/resilience)
- [Transportation](https://www.governing.com/transportation)
- [Workforce](https://www.governing.com/workforce)
- [Government Quotes](https://www.governing.com/quote)
- [News in Numbers](https://www.governing.com/number)
- [Papers](https://papers.governing.com/?promo_code=topnav)
- [Podcasts](https://www.governing.com/podcasts)
- [Webinars](https://webinars.governing.com/?promo_code=topnav)
- [Magazine](https://www.governing.com/magazine)
- [Newsletters](https://newsletters.governing.com/?promo_code=topnav)
- [Search](https://www.governing.com/search)
Menu
[](https://www.governing.com/)
- [Policy](https://www.governing.com/policy)
- [Management](https://www.governing.com/management-and-administration)
- [Finance](https://www.governing.com/finance)
- More News Topics
- [Housing and Urban Issues](https://www.governing.com/urban)
- [Infrastructure](https://www.governing.com/infrastructure)
- [Policy Spotlight: AI](https://www.governing.com/artificial-intelligence)
- [Politics](https://www.governing.com/politics)
- [Resilience](https://www.governing.com/resilience)
- [Transportation](https://www.governing.com/transportation)
- [Workforce](https://www.governing.com/workforce)
- [Government Quotes](https://www.governing.com/quote)
- [News in Numbers](https://www.governing.com/number)
- [Papers](https://papers.governing.com/?promo_code=topnav)
- [Podcasts](https://www.governing.com/podcasts)
- [Webinars](https://webinars.governing.com/?promo_code=topnav)
- [Magazine](https://www.governing.com/magazine)
- [Newsletters](https://newsletters.governing.com/?promo_code=topnav)
- [Search](https://www.governing.com/search)
CONTINUE TO SITE
[â]()
## Internet Explorer 11 is not supported
For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.
[The Future in Context](https://www.governing.com/context)
# The History of Fake News from George Washington to Donald Trump
## Misinformation is a political game that has been played for more than 200 years between presidents and the press. While the tools have changed over the years, the tactics of rumors, attacks and lies remain the same.
Dec. 8, 2021 â˘
[Lindsay Chervinsky](https://www.governing.com/authors/Lindsay-Chervinsky.html)
- [Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/dialog/share?app_id=314190606794339&display=popup&href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.governing.com%2Fcontext%2Fthe-history-of-fake-news-from-george-washington-to-donald-trump)
- [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.governing.com%2Fcontext%2Fthe-history-of-fake-news-from-george-washington-to-donald-trump&mini=true&title=The%20History%20of%20Fake%20News%20from%20George%20Washington%20to%20Donald%20Trump&summary=Misinformation%20is%20a%20political%20game%20that%20has%20been%20played%20for%20more%20than%20200%20years%20between%20presidents%20and%20the%20press.%20While%20the%20tools%20have%20changed%20over%20the%20years%2C%20the%20tactics%20of%20rumors%2C%20attacks%20and%20lies%20remain%20the%20same.&source=Governing)
- [Twitter](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.governing.com%2Fcontext%2Fthe-history-of-fake-news-from-george-washington-to-donald-trump&text=The%20History%20of%20Fake%20News%20from%20George%20Washington%20to%20Donald%20Trump)
- [Email](mailto:?body=The%20History%20of%20Fake%20News%20from%20George%20Washington%20to%20Donald%20Trump%0A%0Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.governing.com%2Fcontext%2Fthe-history-of-fake-news-from-george-washington-to-donald-trump%0A%0AMisinformation%20is%20a%20political%20game%20that%20has%20been%20played%20for%20more%20than%20200%20years%20between%20presidents%20and%20the%20press.%20While%20the%20tools%20have%20changed%20over%20the%20years%2C%20the%20tactics%20of%20rumors%2C%20attacks%20and%20lies%20remain%20the%20same.)
- [Print]()
(Shutterstock)
Thatâs the difference between today and the founding generation. Eighteenth-century readers and consumers of news understood their subscriptions were intensely partisan. Many Americans today are unable to tell the difference.
In January 2017, then-President Trump called CNN â[fake news](https://www.washingtonian.com/2019/10/02/trump-claims-he-invented-the-term-fake-news-an-interview-with-the-guy-who-actually-helped-popularize-it/)â and the term quickly became synonymous with his administrationâs disingenuous attacks on the media. The increasing partisan divide over the last four years has only exacerbated the proliferation of false information and bad-faith attacks on media organizations. While disinformation is rife and a dangerous threat to the health of our republic, this problem is not a new one. From the nationâs earliest days, presidents have grappled with fake news. The only difference is that bad actors today have many more tools at their disposal.
As factional differences solidified during George Washingtonâs first term as president, opposition newspapers began printing criticism, which increased in volume during his second term. He regularly complained of the newspaper treatment to friends and colleagues, especially when the papers printed outright lies.
During the Revolution, British forces [forged letters](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/retropolis/wp/2017/04/10/the-fake-news-that-haunted-george-washington/) from Washington claiming the war was a mistake. Toward the end of his presidency, the letters resurfaced. Washingtonâs enemies claimed the correspondence had been taken from William Lee, Washingtonâs enslaved valet, when Lee was captured by the British. There was only one problem â Lee never left Washingtonâs side during the war. While Washington ignored the letters in the 1770s, he could not remain silent two decades later. He wrote a [fact-check letter](https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Washington/99-01-02-00391) and asked Secretary of State Timothy Pickering to file it in the state department archives.
But facts and evidence couldnât stop his opponents and opposition newspapers kept up their trouble through the 1796 election. After John Adams was elected, the editors reluctantly conceded that John Adams would be better than his predecessor because Washington was a murderer. Washington was many things, but murderer was probably not one of them.
The pro-administration Federalist newspapers werenât much better. During the 1800 presidential election campaign, they warned readers to [bury their bibles](https://slate.com/human-interest/2015/04/religion-in-the-oval-office-americans-dont-think-anyone-is-religious-enough-to-be-president.html). If Thomas Jefferson won, they continued, he would wage a war on religion and confiscate their treasured family volumes. Jefferson had no such plans and his election precipitated no war on Christianity.
Many other elections in the early decades of the U.S. were plagued by false accusations. In 1828, supporters of John Quincy Adams put forth rumors that [Rachel Jackson](https://www.whitehousehistory.org/bios/rachel-jackson) was a woman of ill-repute. Rachel died of a heart attack just before Andrew Jackson moved to the White House. He believed that the rumors had hurried her into an early grave and he never forgave his enemies.
While presidents of all political stripes were annoyed by the fake news, no one was surprised by the vitriol printed in the papers. Readers understood which papers were pro-Federalist, which papers were pro-Republican, and which papers tended toward a more neutral stand. For example, in 1796, as President Washington prepared his [Farewell Address](https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=false&doc=15), he explicitly selected *Claypooleâs Daily Advertiser* because it avoided the political excesses of the *Aurora General Advertiser* or the *Gazette of the United States.* He wished the message to be read in as neutral a light as possible and chose the venue accordingly.
The role of the press in presidential elections began to evolve in the late 19th century with the emergence of a journalistic ethos that prized the pursuit of truth and a professionalism in reporting. Universities created journalism programs to teach standards and best practices, and journalism gained status as a respected career.
These shifts produced landmark reporting of corruption, crime, scandal and more. For example, the â[muckrakers](https://www.britannica.com/topic/muckraker)â were a group of serious journalists that published books and magazine articles about coal mine conditions, political corruption, trusts and monopolies, the meat packing industry, race riots and more. Their persuasive articles led to many reforms during the Progressive Era, including regulations of trusts, pollution, working conditions, and food and product safety.
Other famous examples of professional journalism include the [Pentagon Papers](https://www.archives.gov/research/pentagon-papers), which revealed the extent of President Lyndon Johnsonâs lies and misinformation about the war in Vietnam, and the investigation into the Watergate scandal which ultimately led to President Richard Nixonâs resignation.
To be sure, presidents werenât always pleased that enterprising journalists dug up damaging information about their activities. President Nixon despised the press, threatened lawsuits whenever a paper printed âTricky Dick,â and reportedly told his adviser Henry Kissinger [ânever forget, the press is the enemy, the press is the enemyâŚwrite that on the blackboard 100 times.â](https://longreads.com/2018/11/08/when-richard-nixon-declared-war-on-the-media/)
On the other hand, some journalists protected presidents from scandal. The press notoriously turned a blind eye to John F. Kennedyâs public philandering and [reporters rarely mentioned](https://ideas.time.com/2013/07/12/the-myth-of-fdrs-secret-disability/) that Franklin D. Roosevelt was mostly confined to a wheelchair.
President Trump therefore served as a break with presidential tradition. Unlike previous presidents that grudgingly accepted the role of investigative journalism, Trump regularly accused mainstream media outlets of spreading fake news stories, while serving, along with his supporters, as one of the most prolific creators of disinformation. That information is then amplified by his allies and international actors hoping to capitalize on chaos in the United States.
Trumpâs disinformation efforts enjoyed success for two reasons: Fox News and social media. First, Fox News was the first news channel in many decades that intentionally pursued a political agenda. While viewers may have perceived political bias in reporting at national news networks like NBC, CBS or CNN, Fox was the first to shape its content to support a political party from the top down.
Second, the rise of social media exploited users without the media literacy to discern truth from dis- or misinformation. Many older users expected social media sites to follow the same guidelines and practices employed by the traditional news sources that they had grown up reading. When social media, especially Facebook, accelerated the spread of false information, these viewers were unable to tell the difference. They believed they could trust what was published. They canât.
Related Articles
- [](https://www.governing.com/security/Misinformation-Disinformation-and-What-Government-Can-Do-About-Them.html)
[Security](https://www.governing.com/security)
[Misinformation, Disinformation and What Government Can Do About Them](https://www.governing.com/security/Misinformation-Disinformation-and-What-Government-Can-Do-About-Them.html)
March 03, 2021
¡ [Mark Weatherford](https://www.governing.com/authors/GOV-Mark-Weatherford.html)
- [](https://www.governing.com/security/Will-Regulating-Social-Media-Misinformation-Fix-the-Internet.html)
[Security](https://www.governing.com/security)
[Will Regulating Social Media Misinformation Fix the Internet?](https://www.governing.com/security/Will-Regulating-Social-Media-Misinformation-Fix-the-Internet.html)
April 12, 2021
¡ [Government Technology](https://www.governing.com/authors/Government-Technology.html)
- [](https://www.governing.com/next/No-Matter-Who-Wins-Social-Media-Will-Lose.html)
[Trends](https://www.governing.com/next)
[No Matter Who Wins the Election, Social Media Will Lose](https://www.governing.com/next/No-Matter-Who-Wins-Social-Media-Will-Lose.html)
November 03, 2020
- [Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/dialog/share?app_id=314190606794339&display=popup&href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.governing.com%2Fcontext%2Fthe-history-of-fake-news-from-george-washington-to-donald-trump)
- [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.governing.com%2Fcontext%2Fthe-history-of-fake-news-from-george-washington-to-donald-trump&mini=true&title=The%20History%20of%20Fake%20News%20from%20George%20Washington%20to%20Donald%20Trump&summary=Misinformation%20is%20a%20political%20game%20that%20has%20been%20played%20for%20more%20than%20200%20years%20between%20presidents%20and%20the%20press.%20While%20the%20tools%20have%20changed%20over%20the%20years%2C%20the%20tactics%20of%20rumors%2C%20attacks%20and%20lies%20remain%20the%20same.&source=Governing)
- [Twitter](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.governing.com%2Fcontext%2Fthe-history-of-fake-news-from-george-washington-to-donald-trump&text=The%20History%20of%20Fake%20News%20from%20George%20Washington%20to%20Donald%20Trump)
- [Email](mailto:?body=The%20History%20of%20Fake%20News%20from%20George%20Washington%20to%20Donald%20Trump%0A%0Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.governing.com%2Fcontext%2Fthe-history-of-fake-news-from-george-washington-to-donald-trump%0A%0AMisinformation%20is%20a%20political%20game%20that%20has%20been%20played%20for%20more%20than%20200%20years%20between%20presidents%20and%20the%20press.%20While%20the%20tools%20have%20changed%20over%20the%20years%2C%20the%20tactics%20of%20rumors%2C%20attacks%20and%20lies%20remain%20the%20same.)
- [Print]()
## Tags:
[Elections](https://www.governing.com/tag/politics-and-elections)
[](https://www.governing.com/authors/Lindsay-Chervinsky.html)
[Lindsay Chervinsky](https://www.governing.com/authors/Lindsay-Chervinsky.html)
Dr. Lindsay M. Chervinsky is an expert in the cabinet, presidential history, and U.S. government institutions. She can be found on Twitter at @lmchervinsky.
[See More Stories by Lindsay Chervinsky](https://www.governing.com/authors/Lindsay-Chervinsky.html)
Most Read
[](https://www.governing.com/top-3/top-three-candidates-in-the-california-governors-race)
1. [Top Three Candidates in the California Governorâs Race](https://www.governing.com/top-3/top-three-candidates-in-the-california-governors-race)
2. [A Massachusetts Town Converted Old Offices Into Schools](https://www.governing.com/management-and-administration/a-massachusetts-town-converted-old-offices-into-schools)
3. [States Leave Billions Uncollected by Ignoring âTax Gapâ](https://www.governing.com/finance/states-leave-billions-uncollected-by-ignoring-tax-gap)
Never miss a story with Governing's Daily newsletter.
[SUBSCRIBE](https://newsletters.governing.com/?promo_code=gov_enews_web_flyinID8)
[](https://www.governing.com/)
- - [Papers](https://papers.governing.com/?promo_code=footer)
- [Webinars](https://webinars.governing.com/?promo_code=footer)
- [Podcasts](https://www.governing.com/podcast/?promo_code=footer)
- [Sponsored Articles](https://www.governing.com/sponsored?promo_code=footer)
- - [About](https://www.governing.com/about/?promo_code=footer)
- [Privacy & AI](https://www.erepublic.com/privacy/?promo_code=footer)
- [Contact](https://erepublic.my.salesforce-sites.com/ContactUs/?src=https://www.erepublic.com/)
- [Advertise](https://www.erepublic.com/brands/governing/?promo_code=footer)
[Stay Up To Date](https://newsletters.governing.com/)
Get smart with Governing. Where government is going in states & localities.
[SIGN UP FOR NEWSLETTERS](https://newsletters.governing.com/)
[GET THE MAGAZINE](https://www.governing.com/magazine?promo_code=footer)
Š2026 All rights reserved. e.Republic LLC
[Do Not Sell My Personal Information](https://erepublic.my.salesforce-sites.com/PrivacyRequest/)
- [twitter](https://twitter.com/GOVERNING)
- [instagram](https://www.instagram.com/governingmagazine/)
- [youtube](https://www.youtube.com//user/governingmagazine)
- [facebook](https://www.facebook.com/governing)
- [linkedin](https://www.linkedin.com/company/governing)
[](https://www.governing.com/)
[](https://www.govtech.com/)
[](https://insider.govtech.com/)
[](https://www.govtech.com/cdg)
[](https://www.govtech.com/education)
[](https://www.govtech.com/cpsai)
[](https://www.govtech.com/em) |
| Readable Markdown | Thatâs the difference between today and the founding generation. Eighteenth-century readers and consumers of news understood their subscriptions were intensely partisan. Many Americans today are unable to tell the difference.
In January 2017, then-President Trump called CNN â[fake news](https://www.washingtonian.com/2019/10/02/trump-claims-he-invented-the-term-fake-news-an-interview-with-the-guy-who-actually-helped-popularize-it/)â and the term quickly became synonymous with his administrationâs disingenuous attacks on the media. The increasing partisan divide over the last four years has only exacerbated the proliferation of false information and bad-faith attacks on media organizations. While disinformation is rife and a dangerous threat to the health of our republic, this problem is not a new one. From the nationâs earliest days, presidents have grappled with fake news. The only difference is that bad actors today have many more tools at their disposal.
As factional differences solidified during George Washingtonâs first term as president, opposition newspapers began printing criticism, which increased in volume during his second term. He regularly complained of the newspaper treatment to friends and colleagues, especially when the papers printed outright lies.
During the Revolution, British forces [forged letters](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/retropolis/wp/2017/04/10/the-fake-news-that-haunted-george-washington/) from Washington claiming the war was a mistake. Toward the end of his presidency, the letters resurfaced. Washingtonâs enemies claimed the correspondence had been taken from William Lee, Washingtonâs enslaved valet, when Lee was captured by the British. There was only one problem â Lee never left Washingtonâs side during the war. While Washington ignored the letters in the 1770s, he could not remain silent two decades later. He wrote a [fact-check letter](https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Washington/99-01-02-00391) and asked Secretary of State Timothy Pickering to file it in the state department archives.
But facts and evidence couldnât stop his opponents and opposition newspapers kept up their trouble through the 1796 election. After John Adams was elected, the editors reluctantly conceded that John Adams would be better than his predecessor because Washington was a murderer. Washington was many things, but murderer was probably not one of them.
The pro-administration Federalist newspapers werenât much better. During the 1800 presidential election campaign, they warned readers to [bury their bibles](https://slate.com/human-interest/2015/04/religion-in-the-oval-office-americans-dont-think-anyone-is-religious-enough-to-be-president.html). If Thomas Jefferson won, they continued, he would wage a war on religion and confiscate their treasured family volumes. Jefferson had no such plans and his election precipitated no war on Christianity.
Many other elections in the early decades of the U.S. were plagued by false accusations. In 1828, supporters of John Quincy Adams put forth rumors that [Rachel Jackson](https://www.whitehousehistory.org/bios/rachel-jackson) was a woman of ill-repute. Rachel died of a heart attack just before Andrew Jackson moved to the White House. He believed that the rumors had hurried her into an early grave and he never forgave his enemies.
While presidents of all political stripes were annoyed by the fake news, no one was surprised by the vitriol printed in the papers. Readers understood which papers were pro-Federalist, which papers were pro-Republican, and which papers tended toward a more neutral stand. For example, in 1796, as President Washington prepared his [Farewell Address](https://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=false&doc=15), he explicitly selected *Claypooleâs Daily Advertiser* because it avoided the political excesses of the *Aurora General Advertiser* or the *Gazette of the United States.* He wished the message to be read in as neutral a light as possible and chose the venue accordingly.
The role of the press in presidential elections began to evolve in the late 19th century with the emergence of a journalistic ethos that prized the pursuit of truth and a professionalism in reporting. Universities created journalism programs to teach standards and best practices, and journalism gained status as a respected career.
These shifts produced landmark reporting of corruption, crime, scandal and more. For example, the â[muckrakers](https://www.britannica.com/topic/muckraker)â were a group of serious journalists that published books and magazine articles about coal mine conditions, political corruption, trusts and monopolies, the meat packing industry, race riots and more. Their persuasive articles led to many reforms during the Progressive Era, including regulations of trusts, pollution, working conditions, and food and product safety.
Other famous examples of professional journalism include the [Pentagon Papers](https://www.archives.gov/research/pentagon-papers), which revealed the extent of President Lyndon Johnsonâs lies and misinformation about the war in Vietnam, and the investigation into the Watergate scandal which ultimately led to President Richard Nixonâs resignation.
To be sure, presidents werenât always pleased that enterprising journalists dug up damaging information about their activities. President Nixon despised the press, threatened lawsuits whenever a paper printed âTricky Dick,â and reportedly told his adviser Henry Kissinger [ânever forget, the press is the enemy, the press is the enemyâŚwrite that on the blackboard 100 times.â](https://longreads.com/2018/11/08/when-richard-nixon-declared-war-on-the-media/)
On the other hand, some journalists protected presidents from scandal. The press notoriously turned a blind eye to John F. Kennedyâs public philandering and [reporters rarely mentioned](https://ideas.time.com/2013/07/12/the-myth-of-fdrs-secret-disability/) that Franklin D. Roosevelt was mostly confined to a wheelchair.
President Trump therefore served as a break with presidential tradition. Unlike previous presidents that grudgingly accepted the role of investigative journalism, Trump regularly accused mainstream media outlets of spreading fake news stories, while serving, along with his supporters, as one of the most prolific creators of disinformation. That information is then amplified by his allies and international actors hoping to capitalize on chaos in the United States.
Trumpâs disinformation efforts enjoyed success for two reasons: Fox News and social media. First, Fox News was the first news channel in many decades that intentionally pursued a political agenda. While viewers may have perceived political bias in reporting at national news networks like NBC, CBS or CNN, Fox was the first to shape its content to support a political party from the top down.
Second, the rise of social media exploited users without the media literacy to discern truth from dis- or misinformation. Many older users expected social media sites to follow the same guidelines and practices employed by the traditional news sources that they had grown up reading. When social media, especially Facebook, accelerated the spread of false information, these viewers were unable to tell the difference. They believed they could trust what was published. They canât. |
| Shard | 26 (laksa) |
| Root Hash | 17783765150075812026 |
| Unparsed URL | com,governing!www,/context/the-history-of-fake-news-from-george-washington-to-donald-trump s443 |