🕷️ Crawler Inspector

URL Lookup

Direct Parameter Lookup

Raw Queries and Responses

1. Shard Calculation

Query:

Response:

Calculated Shard: 145 (from laksa106)

2. Crawled Status Check

Query:

curl -X POST \
  'http://laksa145.int.ahrefs:8124/' \
  -H 'Content-Type: text/plain' \
  -H 'X-ClickHouse-Database: crawler3' \
  -H 'Authorization: Basic YXBpOg==' \
  -d 'SELECT getAhrefsURLFromUnparsed(src_unparsed) AS found_url, ifNull(toUnixTimestamp(download_stamp), 0) AS crawl_time, ifNull(toUnixTimestamp(props_url_first_seen), 0) AS first_indexed_time, download_http_code AS http_code, src_unparsed AS src_unparsed, src_root_hash AS src_root_hash, history_drop_reason AS history_drop_reason, meta_title AS meta_title, meta_descriptions AS meta_descriptions, attrs_boilerpipe_text AS attrs_boilerpipe_text, attrs_markdown AS attrs_markdown, attrs_readable_markdown AS attrs_readable_markdown, meta_canonical AS meta_canonical FROM crawler3.page_info_local FINAL PREWHERE (src_root_hash, src_unparsed) IN ((getAhrefsRootHashFromUnparsed(getAhrefsUnparsedNoserviceFromURL(\'https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/fuel-consumption-calculator.php\')), getAhrefsUnparsedNoserviceFromURL(\'https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/fuel-consumption-calculator.php\'))) FORMAT JSONEachRow'

Response:

{"found_url":"https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/fuel-consumption-calculator.php","crawl_time":1775643077,"first_indexed_time":1518912687,"http_code":200,"src_unparsed":"com,gigacalculator!www,\/calculators\/fuel-consumption-calculator.php s443","src_root_hash":"8008885531124104345","history_drop_reason":null,"meta_title":"Fuel Consumption Calculator ⛽ - Fuel Usage \/ Fuel Economy Calculator","meta_descriptions":["Free fuel economy calculator you can use for a car, bus, truck, ship, plane, etc. ➤ Calculate fuel consumption in liters per 100km, price per km travelled, and others. Fuel calculator online."],"attrs_boilerpipe_text":"Use this\nfuel calculator\nto easily calculate the fuel consumption of a vehicle: car, bus, truck, etc. in liters per 100km, kilometers per liter, price per km travelled, etc.\n   \nQuick navigation:\nFuel consumption formula\nDifferent ways to calculate fuel economy\nHow to achieve better fuel efficiency?\n   \nFuel consumption formula\nThe formula for calculating fuel consumption used in this online fuel consumption calculator is:\nFuel consumption = Fuel used \/ Distance travelled\nThe result depends on the metrics used as input: miles per gallon if the input was in miles and gallons, and km per liter if the input was in kilometers and liters.\nAdditionally, the fuel consumption calculator will output the\nfuel cost per mile or fuel cost per km\n, depending on the metric units selected, as well as miles per $ \/ km per $. These are very useful when estimating your fuel costs and can help you predict your expenses easier on a future trip. For example, if you notice that your usually spend $0.15 per mile (15 cents per mile), then if you know you will be travelling for 200 miles, you can calculate the cost of the trip by multiplying 200mi x $0.15 = $30 for a 200 mile trip. Similarly, for km.\n   \nDifferent ways to calculate fuel economy\nFuel efficiency\n, or fuel economy, can be a tricky concept. Understanding that is key for the correct interpretation and comparison of gas consumption estimates such as those produced by this calculator.\nFor example, say you want to compare two types of cars: A and B. You put two researches, one American and one French, to the task, with the first using kilometers per liter as an efficiency metric, while the second using liters per km. You have each researcher record the efficiency of 2 cars of each type, or, alternatively, the consumption of one and the same car in two different environments (the data available is the same for both), and the results recorded by them look like so:\nData for car type A:\nResearcher\nCar 1\nCar 2\nAverage\nAmerican (km per liter)\n1 km\/l\n4 km\/l\n2.5 km\/l\nFrench (liters per km)\n1 l\/km\n0.25 l\/km\n0.625 l\/km\nData for car type B:\nResearcher\nCar 1\nCar 2\nAverage\nAmerican (km per liter)\n2 km\/l\n2 km\/l\n2 km\/l\nFrench (liters per km)\n0.5 l\/km\n0.5 l\/km\n0.5 l\/km\nAverage above means the\narithmetic mean\n. The US engineer will see that for type A the average is 2.5 while for type B it is just 2.0, concluding that type A is more efficient than type B as it can cover a greater distance with a liter of diesel, petrol, gas, etc. The French will see that for type A the average is 0.625 while for type B it is 0.5 and will conclude that type B is more efficient than type A, as the car will use less fuel to cover the same distance. The two researchers would\ncome to different conclusions\nas they are using different metrics!\nBut\nwho is right\nin the above example? The fuel consumption calculation is correct in both cases. The issue is what we care about when we calculate fuel consumption and fuel efficiency \/ fuel usage. Most people would argue that we care about\nhow much fuel we would need to cover a given distance\n. In such a case the French researcher is correct as the average is misleading the US researcher. Here is an explanation why: if you take both cars of type A and want to cover 100 kilometers with each of them, you would need not 200 \/ 2.5 = 80 liters, but 125 liters of petrol (100 liters for the first car and 25 liters for the second). The French will get it right by multiplying 200 x 0.625 = 125. For type B both researchers will correctly estimate that 100 liters will be required for the same task. Therefore, type B is more efficient than type A.\nHowever, if you define efficiency as\ncovering the greatest distance given a certain fuel amount\n, then the US researcher would be correct. If we give each car of type A a liter of fuel, they will cover 5 kilometers combined while giving each car of type B a liter of fuel, they will cover only 4 km combined. It follows that type A is more efficient than type B using this definition. Note that the\nkm\/l average is not misleading\nhere, as it is 2.5 km\/l, and 2 x 2.5 = 5, which is correct.\nThe above is an illustration of why when using our fuel consumption calculator or similar tools it is important to keep track of the end goal and define the question at hand precisely before measuring and making conclusions. It is also a lesson on applying appropriate data transformations. The arithmetic average is not invariant to monotonic transformations which becomes an issue when averaging the performance of two or more vehicles or when averaging the performance of a\nsingle vehicle in different situations\n. For example, highway fuel consumption and city drive consumption could be used in place of Car 1 and Car 2 in the example table above and produce the same result.\nThe car example uses as a basis one from Hand D. (1994) \"Deconstructing Statistical Questions\",\nJournal of the Royal Statistical Society\n, Series A, Vol.157-3:317-356. Fuel consumption calculations are performed using this online calculator.\n   \nHow to achieve better fuel efficiency?\nIn brief, the best way to achieve better fuel economy is to:\nKeep your car and tyres well-maintained\nAvoid frequent\nacceleration\nand deceleration\nDrive at a lower overall\naverage speed\nAvoid or reduce the use of air conditioning\nReduce the weight of the vehicle by not carrying excess cargo\nAll of the above would reduce the amount of fuel consumed per unit of distance covered. For more in-depth advice, check out our list of ways to\nimprove your fuel economy\n.","attrs_markdown":"[![GIGA Online Calculator](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/img\/calculator-logo.svg)](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/)\n\n![Expand the main menu](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/img\/bars-light.svg)\n\n- [Calculators](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/)\n- [Converters](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/converters\/)\n- [Randomizers](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/randomizers\/)\n- [Articles](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/articles\/)\n\n1. [Calculators](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/)\n2. [Transportation](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/transportation\/)\n3. Fuel Consumption Calculator\n\n# Fuel Consumption Calculator ⛽\nUse this **fuel calculator** to easily calculate the fuel consumption of a vehicle: car, bus, truck, etc. in liters per 100km, kilometers per liter, price per km travelled, etc.\n\n- [Imperial (miles, gal)](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/fuel-consumption-calculator.php \"Unit system Imperial (miles, gal)\")\n- [Metric (km, liters)](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/fuel-consumption-calculator.php \"Unit system Metric (km, liters)\")\n\n**Share calculator:**\n\n**Embed this tool:**  \n [get code](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/fuel-consumption-calculator.php)\n\n##### Related calculators\n[Fuel Efficiency Converter](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/converters\/fuel-consumption-converter.php) [Fuel Cost](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/fuel-calculator.php) [MPG](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/mpg-calculator.php)\n\nQuick navigation:\n\n1. [Fuel consumption formula](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/fuel-consumption-calculator.php#formula)\n2. [Different ways to calculate fuel economy](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/fuel-consumption-calculator.php#howtocalculate)\n3. [How to achieve better fuel efficiency?](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/fuel-consumption-calculator.php#fuelefficiency)\n## Fuel consumption formula\nThe formula for calculating fuel consumption used in this online fuel consumption calculator is:\n\n**Fuel consumption = Fuel used \/ Distance travelled**\n\nThe result depends on the metrics used as input: miles per gallon if the input was in miles and gallons, and km per liter if the input was in kilometers and liters.\n\nAdditionally, the fuel consumption calculator will output the **fuel cost per mile or fuel cost per km**, depending on the metric units selected, as well as miles per \\$ \/ km per \\$. These are very useful when estimating your fuel costs and can help you predict your expenses easier on a future trip. For example, if you notice that your usually spend \\$0.15 per mile (15 cents per mile), then if you know you will be travelling for 200 miles, you can calculate the cost of the trip by multiplying 200mi x \\$0.15 = \\$30 for a 200 mile trip. Similarly, for km.\n\n## Different ways to calculate fuel economy\n**Fuel efficiency**, or fuel economy, can be a tricky concept. Understanding that is key for the correct interpretation and comparison of gas consumption estimates such as those produced by this calculator.\n\nFor example, say you want to compare two types of cars: A and B. You put two researches, one American and one French, to the task, with the first using kilometers per liter as an efficiency metric, while the second using liters per km. You have each researcher record the efficiency of 2 cars of each type, or, alternatively, the consumption of one and the same car in two different environments (the data available is the same for both), and the results recorded by them look like so:\n\n**Data for car type A:**\n\n| Researcher | Car 1 | Car 2 | Average |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| American (km per liter) | 1 km\/l | 4 km\/l | 2\\.5 km\/l |\n| French (liters per km) | 1 l\/km | 0\\.25 l\/km | 0\\.625 l\/km |\n\n**Data for car type B:**\n\n| Researcher | Car 1 | Car 2 | Average |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| American (km per liter) | 2 km\/l | 2 km\/l | 2 km\/l |\n| French (liters per km) | 0\\.5 l\/km | 0\\.5 l\/km | 0\\.5 l\/km |\n\nAverage above means the [arithmetic mean](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/mean-calculator.php). The US engineer will see that for type A the average is 2.5 while for type B it is just 2.0, concluding that type A is more efficient than type B as it can cover a greater distance with a liter of diesel, petrol, gas, etc. The French will see that for type A the average is 0.625 while for type B it is 0.5 and will conclude that type B is more efficient than type A, as the car will use less fuel to cover the same distance. The two researchers would **come to different conclusions** as they are using different metrics\\!\n\nBut **who is right** in the above example? The fuel consumption calculation is correct in both cases. The issue is what we care about when we calculate fuel consumption and fuel efficiency \/ fuel usage. Most people would argue that we care about **how much fuel we would need to cover a given distance**. In such a case the French researcher is correct as the average is misleading the US researcher. Here is an explanation why: if you take both cars of type A and want to cover 100 kilometers with each of them, you would need not 200 \/ 2.5 = 80 liters, but 125 liters of petrol (100 liters for the first car and 25 liters for the second). The French will get it right by multiplying 200 x 0.625 = 125. For type B both researchers will correctly estimate that 100 liters will be required for the same task. Therefore, type B is more efficient than type A.\n\nHowever, if you define efficiency as **covering the greatest distance given a certain fuel amount**, then the US researcher would be correct. If we give each car of type A a liter of fuel, they will cover 5 kilometers combined while giving each car of type B a liter of fuel, they will cover only 4 km combined. It follows that type A is more efficient than type B using this definition. Note that the **km\/l average is not misleading** here, as it is 2.5 km\/l, and 2 x 2.5 = 5, which is correct.\n\nThe above is an illustration of why when using our fuel consumption calculator or similar tools it is important to keep track of the end goal and define the question at hand precisely before measuring and making conclusions. It is also a lesson on applying appropriate data transformations. The arithmetic average is not invariant to monotonic transformations which becomes an issue when averaging the performance of two or more vehicles or when averaging the performance of a **single vehicle in different situations**. For example, highway fuel consumption and city drive consumption could be used in place of Car 1 and Car 2 in the example table above and produce the same result.\n\nThe car example uses as a basis one from Hand D. (1994) \"Deconstructing Statistical Questions\", *Journal of the Royal Statistical Society*, Series A, Vol.157-3:317-356. Fuel consumption calculations are performed using this online calculator.\n\n## How to achieve better fuel efficiency?\nIn brief, the best way to achieve better fuel economy is to:\n\n1. Keep your car and tyres well-maintained\n2. Avoid frequent [acceleration](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/acceleration-calculator.php) and deceleration\n3. Drive at a lower overall [average speed](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/average-speed-calculator.php)\n4. Avoid or reduce the use of air conditioning\n5. Reduce the weight of the vehicle by not carrying excess cargo\n\nAll of the above would reduce the amount of fuel consumed per unit of distance covered. For more in-depth advice, check out our list of ways to [improve your fuel economy](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/fuel-calculator.php#fueleconomy).\n\n#### Cite this calculator & page\nIf you'd like to cite this online calculator resource and information as provided on the page, you can use the following citation:   \nGeorgiev G.Z., *\"Fuel Consumption Calculator\"*, \\[online\\] Available at: <https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/fuel-consumption-calculator.php> URL \\[Accessed Date: 08 Apr, 2026\\].\n\n##### Transportation calculators\n[Fuel Cost Calculator](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/fuel-calculator.php) [Gas Mileage (MPG) Calculator](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/mpg-calculator.php) [Speed Distance Time Calculator](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/speed-calculator.php) [Average Speed Calculator](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/average-speed-calculator.php) [Fuel Consumption Calculator](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/fuel-consumption-calculator.php) [Pallet Calculator](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/pallet-calculator.php) [Container Loading Calculator](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/container-loading-calculator.php)\n\nPopular Calculators & Converters\n\n[Percent Off](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/percent-off-calculator.php)\n\n[Tip Amount](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/tip-calculator.php)\n\n[Height Comparison](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/height-comparison.php)\n\n[Water Intake](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/water-intake-calculator.php)\n\n[Speed](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/average-speed-calculator.php)\n\n[Interest](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/compound-interest-calculator.php)\n\n[Discount](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/discount-calculator.php)\n\n[VAT](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/vat-calculator.php)\n\n[ROI](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/roi-calculator.php)\n\n[Concrete](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/concrete-calculator.php)\n\n[Height](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/height-calculator.php)\n\n[Mean](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/mean-calculator.php)\n\n[Percentage](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/percentage-calculator.php)\n\n[Exponent](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/exponent-calculator.php)\n\n[Fraction](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/fractions-calculator.php)\n\n[Trigonometry](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/trigonometry-calculator.php)\n\n[Area](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/area-calculator.php)\n\n[Volume](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/volume-calculator.php)\n\n[Random Number](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/random-number-generator.php)\n\n[Password Generator](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/random-password-generator.php)\n\n[Age](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/age-calculator.php)\n\n[Hours](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/hours-between-times-calculator.php)\n\n[Days](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/days-between-dates-calculator.php)\n\n[Years](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/how-many-years-calculator.php)\n\n[Time card](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/work-hours-timesheet-calculator.php)\n\n[BMI](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/bmi-calculator.php)\n\n[Body Fat](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/body-fat-calculator.php)\n\n[TDEE](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/tdee-calculator.php)\n\n[Weight loss](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/weight-loss-calorie-calculator.php)\n\n[Standard Deviation](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/standard-deviation-calculator.php)\n\nGIGA Calculator\n\n[F.A.Q.](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/faq.php)\n\n[Calculator Widgets](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculator-widget.php)\n\n[Converter Widgets](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/converter-widget.php)\n\n[Randomizer Widgets](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/randomizer-widget.php)\n\n[Articles](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/articles\/)\n\n[All tools](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/all.php)\n\nOther\n\n[Privacy Policy](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/privacy.php)\n\n[Terms of Service](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/terms.php)\n\n[About Us](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/about.php)\n\n[Contact Us](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/contact.php)\n\nOur online calculators, converters, randomizers, and content are provided \"as is\", free of charge, and without any warranty or guarantee. Each tool is carefully developed and rigorously tested, and our content is well-sourced, but despite our best effort it is possible they contain errors. We are not to be held responsible for any resulting damages from proper or improper use of the service. [See our full terms of service](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/terms.php).\n\nCopyright © 2017-2026 GIGAcalculator.com","attrs_readable_markdown":"Use this **fuel calculator** to easily calculate the fuel consumption of a vehicle: car, bus, truck, etc. in liters per 100km, kilometers per liter, price per km travelled, etc.\n\nQuick navigation:\n\n1. [Fuel consumption formula](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/fuel-consumption-calculator.php#formula)\n2. [Different ways to calculate fuel economy](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/fuel-consumption-calculator.php#howtocalculate)\n3. [How to achieve better fuel efficiency?](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/fuel-consumption-calculator.php#fuelefficiency)\n## Fuel consumption formula\nThe formula for calculating fuel consumption used in this online fuel consumption calculator is:\n\n**Fuel consumption = Fuel used \/ Distance travelled**\n\nThe result depends on the metrics used as input: miles per gallon if the input was in miles and gallons, and km per liter if the input was in kilometers and liters.\n\nAdditionally, the fuel consumption calculator will output the **fuel cost per mile or fuel cost per km**, depending on the metric units selected, as well as miles per \\$ \/ km per \\$. These are very useful when estimating your fuel costs and can help you predict your expenses easier on a future trip. For example, if you notice that your usually spend \\$0.15 per mile (15 cents per mile), then if you know you will be travelling for 200 miles, you can calculate the cost of the trip by multiplying 200mi x \\$0.15 = \\$30 for a 200 mile trip. Similarly, for km.\n\n## Different ways to calculate fuel economy\n**Fuel efficiency**, or fuel economy, can be a tricky concept. Understanding that is key for the correct interpretation and comparison of gas consumption estimates such as those produced by this calculator.\n\nFor example, say you want to compare two types of cars: A and B. You put two researches, one American and one French, to the task, with the first using kilometers per liter as an efficiency metric, while the second using liters per km. You have each researcher record the efficiency of 2 cars of each type, or, alternatively, the consumption of one and the same car in two different environments (the data available is the same for both), and the results recorded by them look like so:\n\n**Data for car type A:**\n\n| Researcher | Car 1 | Car 2 | Average |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| American (km per liter) | 1 km\/l | 4 km\/l | 2\\.5 km\/l |\n| French (liters per km) | 1 l\/km | 0\\.25 l\/km | 0\\.625 l\/km |\n\n**Data for car type B:**\n\n| Researcher | Car 1 | Car 2 | Average |\n|---|---|---|---|\n| American (km per liter) | 2 km\/l | 2 km\/l | 2 km\/l |\n| French (liters per km) | 0\\.5 l\/km | 0\\.5 l\/km | 0\\.5 l\/km |\n\nAverage above means the [arithmetic mean](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/mean-calculator.php). The US engineer will see that for type A the average is 2.5 while for type B it is just 2.0, concluding that type A is more efficient than type B as it can cover a greater distance with a liter of diesel, petrol, gas, etc. The French will see that for type A the average is 0.625 while for type B it is 0.5 and will conclude that type B is more efficient than type A, as the car will use less fuel to cover the same distance. The two researchers would **come to different conclusions** as they are using different metrics\\!\n\nBut **who is right** in the above example? The fuel consumption calculation is correct in both cases. The issue is what we care about when we calculate fuel consumption and fuel efficiency \/ fuel usage. Most people would argue that we care about **how much fuel we would need to cover a given distance**. In such a case the French researcher is correct as the average is misleading the US researcher. Here is an explanation why: if you take both cars of type A and want to cover 100 kilometers with each of them, you would need not 200 \/ 2.5 = 80 liters, but 125 liters of petrol (100 liters for the first car and 25 liters for the second). The French will get it right by multiplying 200 x 0.625 = 125. For type B both researchers will correctly estimate that 100 liters will be required for the same task. Therefore, type B is more efficient than type A.\n\nHowever, if you define efficiency as **covering the greatest distance given a certain fuel amount**, then the US researcher would be correct. If we give each car of type A a liter of fuel, they will cover 5 kilometers combined while giving each car of type B a liter of fuel, they will cover only 4 km combined. It follows that type A is more efficient than type B using this definition. Note that the **km\/l average is not misleading** here, as it is 2.5 km\/l, and 2 x 2.5 = 5, which is correct.\n\nThe above is an illustration of why when using our fuel consumption calculator or similar tools it is important to keep track of the end goal and define the question at hand precisely before measuring and making conclusions. It is also a lesson on applying appropriate data transformations. The arithmetic average is not invariant to monotonic transformations which becomes an issue when averaging the performance of two or more vehicles or when averaging the performance of a **single vehicle in different situations**. For example, highway fuel consumption and city drive consumption could be used in place of Car 1 and Car 2 in the example table above and produce the same result.\n\nThe car example uses as a basis one from Hand D. (1994) \"Deconstructing Statistical Questions\", *Journal of the Royal Statistical Society*, Series A, Vol.157-3:317-356. Fuel consumption calculations are performed using this online calculator.\n\n## How to achieve better fuel efficiency?\nIn brief, the best way to achieve better fuel economy is to:\n\n1. Keep your car and tyres well-maintained\n2. Avoid frequent [acceleration](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/acceleration-calculator.php) and deceleration\n3. Drive at a lower overall [average speed](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/average-speed-calculator.php)\n4. Avoid or reduce the use of air conditioning\n5. Reduce the weight of the vehicle by not carrying excess cargo\n\nAll of the above would reduce the amount of fuel consumed per unit of distance covered. For more in-depth advice, check out our list of ways to [improve your fuel economy](https:\/\/www.gigacalculator.com\/calculators\/fuel-calculator.php#fueleconomy).","meta_canonical":null}

3. Robots.txt Check

Query:

Response:

4. Spam/Ban Check

Query:

Response:

5. Seen Status Check

ℹ️ Skipped - page is already crawled

📄

INDEXABLE

✅

CRAWLED

9 hours ago

🤖

ROBOTS ALLOWED

Page Info Filters

Filter	Status	Condition	Details
HTTP status	PASS	`download_http_code = 200`	HTTP 200
Age cutoff	PASS	`download_stamp > now() - 6 MONTH`	0 months ago
History drop	PASS	`isNull(history_drop_reason)`	No drop reason
Spam/ban	PASS	`fh_dont_index != 1 AND ml_spam_score = 0`	ml_spam_score=0
Canonical	PASS	`meta_canonical IS NULL OR = '' OR = src_unparsed`	Not set

Page Details

Property	Value
URL	https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/fuel-consumption-calculator.php
Last Crawled	2026-04-08 10:11:17 (9 hours ago)
First Indexed	2018-02-18 00:11:27 (8 years ago)
HTTP Status Code	200
Meta Title	Fuel Consumption Calculator ⛽ - Fuel Usage / Fuel Economy Calculator
Meta Description	Free fuel economy calculator you can use for a car, bus, truck, ship, plane, etc. ➤ Calculate fuel consumption in liters per 100km, price per km travelled, and others. Fuel calculator online.
Meta Canonical	null
Boilerpipe Text	Use this fuel calculator to easily calculate the fuel consumption of a vehicle: car, bus, truck, etc. in liters per 100km, kilometers per liter, price per km travelled, etc. Quick navigation: Fuel consumption formula Different ways to calculate fuel economy How to achieve better fuel efficiency? Fuel consumption formula The formula for calculating fuel consumption used in this online fuel consumption calculator is: Fuel consumption = Fuel used / Distance travelled The result depends on the metrics used as input: miles per gallon if the input was in miles and gallons, and km per liter if the input was in kilometers and liters. Additionally, the fuel consumption calculator will output the fuel cost per mile or fuel cost per km , depending on the metric units selected, as well as miles per $ / km per $. These are very useful when estimating your fuel costs and can help you predict your expenses easier on a future trip. For example, if you notice that your usually spend $0.15 per mile (15 cents per mile), then if you know you will be travelling for 200 miles, you can calculate the cost of the trip by multiplying 200mi x $0.15 = $30 for a 200 mile trip. Similarly, for km. Different ways to calculate fuel economy Fuel efficiency , or fuel economy, can be a tricky concept. Understanding that is key for the correct interpretation and comparison of gas consumption estimates such as those produced by this calculator. For example, say you want to compare two types of cars: A and B. You put two researches, one American and one French, to the task, with the first using kilometers per liter as an efficiency metric, while the second using liters per km. You have each researcher record the efficiency of 2 cars of each type, or, alternatively, the consumption of one and the same car in two different environments (the data available is the same for both), and the results recorded by them look like so: Data for car type A: Researcher Car 1 Car 2 Average American (km per liter) 1 km/l 4 km/l 2.5 km/l French (liters per km) 1 l/km 0.25 l/km 0.625 l/km Data for car type B: Researcher Car 1 Car 2 Average American (km per liter) 2 km/l 2 km/l 2 km/l French (liters per km) 0.5 l/km 0.5 l/km 0.5 l/km Average above means the arithmetic mean . The US engineer will see that for type A the average is 2.5 while for type B it is just 2.0, concluding that type A is more efficient than type B as it can cover a greater distance with a liter of diesel, petrol, gas, etc. The French will see that for type A the average is 0.625 while for type B it is 0.5 and will conclude that type B is more efficient than type A, as the car will use less fuel to cover the same distance. The two researchers would come to different conclusions as they are using different metrics! But who is right in the above example? The fuel consumption calculation is correct in both cases. The issue is what we care about when we calculate fuel consumption and fuel efficiency / fuel usage. Most people would argue that we care about how much fuel we would need to cover a given distance . In such a case the French researcher is correct as the average is misleading the US researcher. Here is an explanation why: if you take both cars of type A and want to cover 100 kilometers with each of them, you would need not 200 / 2.5 = 80 liters, but 125 liters of petrol (100 liters for the first car and 25 liters for the second). The French will get it right by multiplying 200 x 0.625 = 125. For type B both researchers will correctly estimate that 100 liters will be required for the same task. Therefore, type B is more efficient than type A. However, if you define efficiency as covering the greatest distance given a certain fuel amount , then the US researcher would be correct. If we give each car of type A a liter of fuel, they will cover 5 kilometers combined while giving each car of type B a liter of fuel, they will cover only 4 km combined. It follows that type A is more efficient than type B using this definition. Note that the km/l average is not misleading here, as it is 2.5 km/l, and 2 x 2.5 = 5, which is correct. The above is an illustration of why when using our fuel consumption calculator or similar tools it is important to keep track of the end goal and define the question at hand precisely before measuring and making conclusions. It is also a lesson on applying appropriate data transformations. The arithmetic average is not invariant to monotonic transformations which becomes an issue when averaging the performance of two or more vehicles or when averaging the performance of a single vehicle in different situations . For example, highway fuel consumption and city drive consumption could be used in place of Car 1 and Car 2 in the example table above and produce the same result. The car example uses as a basis one from Hand D. (1994) "Deconstructing Statistical Questions", Journal of the Royal Statistical Society , Series A, Vol.157-3:317-356. Fuel consumption calculations are performed using this online calculator. How to achieve better fuel efficiency? In brief, the best way to achieve better fuel economy is to: Keep your car and tyres well-maintained Avoid frequent acceleration and deceleration Drive at a lower overall average speed Avoid or reduce the use of air conditioning Reduce the weight of the vehicle by not carrying excess cargo All of the above would reduce the amount of fuel consumed per unit of distance covered. For more in-depth advice, check out our list of ways to improve your fuel economy .
Markdown	[![GIGA Online Calculator](https://www.gigacalculator.com/img/calculator-logo.svg)](https://www.gigacalculator.com/) ![Expand the main menu](https://www.gigacalculator.com/img/bars-light.svg) - [Calculators](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/) - [Converters](https://www.gigacalculator.com/converters/) - [Randomizers](https://www.gigacalculator.com/randomizers/) - [Articles](https://www.gigacalculator.com/articles/) 1. [Calculators](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/) 2. [Transportation](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/transportation/) 3. Fuel Consumption Calculator # Fuel Consumption Calculator ⛽ Use this fuel calculator to easily calculate the fuel consumption of a vehicle: car, bus, truck, etc. in liters per 100km, kilometers per liter, price per km travelled, etc. - [Imperial (miles, gal)](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/fuel-consumption-calculator.php "Unit system Imperial (miles, gal)") - [Metric (km, liters)](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/fuel-consumption-calculator.php "Unit system Metric (km, liters)") Share calculator: Embed this tool: [get code](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/fuel-consumption-calculator.php) ##### Related calculators [Fuel Efficiency Converter](https://www.gigacalculator.com/converters/fuel-consumption-converter.php) [Fuel Cost](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/fuel-calculator.php) [MPG](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/mpg-calculator.php) Quick navigation: 1. [Fuel consumption formula](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/fuel-consumption-calculator.php#formula) 2. [Different ways to calculate fuel economy](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/fuel-consumption-calculator.php#howtocalculate) 3. [How to achieve better fuel efficiency?](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/fuel-consumption-calculator.php#fuelefficiency) ## Fuel consumption formula The formula for calculating fuel consumption used in this online fuel consumption calculator is: Fuel consumption = Fuel used / Distance travelled The result depends on the metrics used as input: miles per gallon if the input was in miles and gallons, and km per liter if the input was in kilometers and liters. Additionally, the fuel consumption calculator will output the fuel cost per mile or fuel cost per km, depending on the metric units selected, as well as miles per \$ / km per \$. These are very useful when estimating your fuel costs and can help you predict your expenses easier on a future trip. For example, if you notice that your usually spend \$0.15 per mile (15 cents per mile), then if you know you will be travelling for 200 miles, you can calculate the cost of the trip by multiplying 200mi x \$0.15 = \$30 for a 200 mile trip. Similarly, for km. ## Different ways to calculate fuel economy Fuel efficiency, or fuel economy, can be a tricky concept. Understanding that is key for the correct interpretation and comparison of gas consumption estimates such as those produced by this calculator. For example, say you want to compare two types of cars: A and B. You put two researches, one American and one French, to the task, with the first using kilometers per liter as an efficiency metric, while the second using liters per km. You have each researcher record the efficiency of 2 cars of each type, or, alternatively, the consumption of one and the same car in two different environments (the data available is the same for both), and the results recorded by them look like so: Data for car type A: \| Researcher \| Car 1 \| Car 2 \| Average \| \|---\|---\|---\|---\| \| American (km per liter) \| 1 km/l \| 4 km/l \| 2\.5 km/l \| \| French (liters per km) \| 1 l/km \| 0\.25 l/km \| 0\.625 l/km \| Data for car type B: \| Researcher \| Car 1 \| Car 2 \| Average \| \|---\|---\|---\|---\| \| American (km per liter) \| 2 km/l \| 2 km/l \| 2 km/l \| \| French (liters per km) \| 0\.5 l/km \| 0\.5 l/km \| 0\.5 l/km \| Average above means the [arithmetic mean](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/mean-calculator.php). The US engineer will see that for type A the average is 2.5 while for type B it is just 2.0, concluding that type A is more efficient than type B as it can cover a greater distance with a liter of diesel, petrol, gas, etc. The French will see that for type A the average is 0.625 while for type B it is 0.5 and will conclude that type B is more efficient than type A, as the car will use less fuel to cover the same distance. The two researchers would come to different conclusions as they are using different metrics\! But who is right in the above example? The fuel consumption calculation is correct in both cases. The issue is what we care about when we calculate fuel consumption and fuel efficiency / fuel usage. Most people would argue that we care about how much fuel we would need to cover a given distance. In such a case the French researcher is correct as the average is misleading the US researcher. Here is an explanation why: if you take both cars of type A and want to cover 100 kilometers with each of them, you would need not 200 / 2.5 = 80 liters, but 125 liters of petrol (100 liters for the first car and 25 liters for the second). The French will get it right by multiplying 200 x 0.625 = 125. For type B both researchers will correctly estimate that 100 liters will be required for the same task. Therefore, type B is more efficient than type A. However, if you define efficiency as covering the greatest distance given a certain fuel amount, then the US researcher would be correct. If we give each car of type A a liter of fuel, they will cover 5 kilometers combined while giving each car of type B a liter of fuel, they will cover only 4 km combined. It follows that type A is more efficient than type B using this definition. Note that the km/l average is not misleading here, as it is 2.5 km/l, and 2 x 2.5 = 5, which is correct. The above is an illustration of why when using our fuel consumption calculator or similar tools it is important to keep track of the end goal and define the question at hand precisely before measuring and making conclusions. It is also a lesson on applying appropriate data transformations. The arithmetic average is not invariant to monotonic transformations which becomes an issue when averaging the performance of two or more vehicles or when averaging the performance of a single vehicle in different situations. For example, highway fuel consumption and city drive consumption could be used in place of Car 1 and Car 2 in the example table above and produce the same result. The car example uses as a basis one from Hand D. (1994) "Deconstructing Statistical Questions", Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, Vol.157-3:317-356. Fuel consumption calculations are performed using this online calculator. ## How to achieve better fuel efficiency? In brief, the best way to achieve better fuel economy is to: 1. Keep your car and tyres well-maintained 2. Avoid frequent [acceleration](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/acceleration-calculator.php) and deceleration 3. Drive at a lower overall [average speed](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/average-speed-calculator.php) 4. Avoid or reduce the use of air conditioning 5. Reduce the weight of the vehicle by not carrying excess cargo All of the above would reduce the amount of fuel consumed per unit of distance covered. For more in-depth advice, check out our list of ways to [improve your fuel economy](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/fuel-calculator.php#fueleconomy). #### Cite this calculator & page If you'd like to cite this online calculator resource and information as provided on the page, you can use the following citation: Georgiev G.Z., "Fuel Consumption Calculator", \[online\] Available at: <https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/fuel-consumption-calculator.php> URL \[Accessed Date: 08 Apr, 2026\]. ##### Transportation calculators [Fuel Cost Calculator](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/fuel-calculator.php) [Gas Mileage (MPG) Calculator](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/mpg-calculator.php) [Speed Distance Time Calculator](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/speed-calculator.php) [Average Speed Calculator](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/average-speed-calculator.php) [Fuel Consumption Calculator](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/fuel-consumption-calculator.php) [Pallet Calculator](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/pallet-calculator.php) [Container Loading Calculator](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/container-loading-calculator.php) Popular Calculators & Converters [Percent Off](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/percent-off-calculator.php) [Tip Amount](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/tip-calculator.php) [Height Comparison](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/height-comparison.php) [Water Intake](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/water-intake-calculator.php) [Speed](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/average-speed-calculator.php) [Interest](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/compound-interest-calculator.php) [Discount](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/discount-calculator.php) [VAT](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/vat-calculator.php) [ROI](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/roi-calculator.php) [Concrete](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/concrete-calculator.php) [Height](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/height-calculator.php) [Mean](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/mean-calculator.php) [Percentage](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/percentage-calculator.php) [Exponent](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/exponent-calculator.php) [Fraction](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/fractions-calculator.php) [Trigonometry](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/trigonometry-calculator.php) [Area](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/area-calculator.php) [Volume](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/volume-calculator.php) [Random Number](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/random-number-generator.php) [Password Generator](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/random-password-generator.php) [Age](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/age-calculator.php) [Hours](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/hours-between-times-calculator.php) [Days](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/days-between-dates-calculator.php) [Years](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/how-many-years-calculator.php) [Time card](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/work-hours-timesheet-calculator.php) [BMI](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/bmi-calculator.php) [Body Fat](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/body-fat-calculator.php) [TDEE](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/tdee-calculator.php) [Weight loss](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/weight-loss-calorie-calculator.php) [Standard Deviation](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/standard-deviation-calculator.php) GIGA Calculator [F.A.Q.](https://www.gigacalculator.com/faq.php) [Calculator Widgets](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculator-widget.php) [Converter Widgets](https://www.gigacalculator.com/converter-widget.php) [Randomizer Widgets](https://www.gigacalculator.com/randomizer-widget.php) [Articles](https://www.gigacalculator.com/articles/) [All tools](https://www.gigacalculator.com/all.php) Other [Privacy Policy](https://www.gigacalculator.com/privacy.php) [Terms of Service](https://www.gigacalculator.com/terms.php) [About Us](https://www.gigacalculator.com/about.php) [Contact Us](https://www.gigacalculator.com/contact.php) Our online calculators, converters, randomizers, and content are provided "as is", free of charge, and without any warranty or guarantee. Each tool is carefully developed and rigorously tested, and our content is well-sourced, but despite our best effort it is possible they contain errors. We are not to be held responsible for any resulting damages from proper or improper use of the service. [See our full terms of service](https://www.gigacalculator.com/terms.php). Copyright © 2017-2026 GIGAcalculator.com
Readable Markdown	Use this fuel calculator to easily calculate the fuel consumption of a vehicle: car, bus, truck, etc. in liters per 100km, kilometers per liter, price per km travelled, etc. Quick navigation: 1. [Fuel consumption formula](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/fuel-consumption-calculator.php#formula) 2. [Different ways to calculate fuel economy](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/fuel-consumption-calculator.php#howtocalculate) 3. [How to achieve better fuel efficiency?](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/fuel-consumption-calculator.php#fuelefficiency) ## Fuel consumption formula The formula for calculating fuel consumption used in this online fuel consumption calculator is: Fuel consumption = Fuel used / Distance travelled The result depends on the metrics used as input: miles per gallon if the input was in miles and gallons, and km per liter if the input was in kilometers and liters. Additionally, the fuel consumption calculator will output the fuel cost per mile or fuel cost per km, depending on the metric units selected, as well as miles per \$ / km per \$. These are very useful when estimating your fuel costs and can help you predict your expenses easier on a future trip. For example, if you notice that your usually spend \$0.15 per mile (15 cents per mile), then if you know you will be travelling for 200 miles, you can calculate the cost of the trip by multiplying 200mi x \$0.15 = \$30 for a 200 mile trip. Similarly, for km. ## Different ways to calculate fuel economy Fuel efficiency, or fuel economy, can be a tricky concept. Understanding that is key for the correct interpretation and comparison of gas consumption estimates such as those produced by this calculator. For example, say you want to compare two types of cars: A and B. You put two researches, one American and one French, to the task, with the first using kilometers per liter as an efficiency metric, while the second using liters per km. You have each researcher record the efficiency of 2 cars of each type, or, alternatively, the consumption of one and the same car in two different environments (the data available is the same for both), and the results recorded by them look like so: Data for car type A: \| Researcher \| Car 1 \| Car 2 \| Average \| \|---\|---\|---\|---\| \| American (km per liter) \| 1 km/l \| 4 km/l \| 2\.5 km/l \| \| French (liters per km) \| 1 l/km \| 0\.25 l/km \| 0\.625 l/km \| Data for car type B: \| Researcher \| Car 1 \| Car 2 \| Average \| \|---\|---\|---\|---\| \| American (km per liter) \| 2 km/l \| 2 km/l \| 2 km/l \| \| French (liters per km) \| 0\.5 l/km \| 0\.5 l/km \| 0\.5 l/km \| Average above means the [arithmetic mean](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/mean-calculator.php). The US engineer will see that for type A the average is 2.5 while for type B it is just 2.0, concluding that type A is more efficient than type B as it can cover a greater distance with a liter of diesel, petrol, gas, etc. The French will see that for type A the average is 0.625 while for type B it is 0.5 and will conclude that type B is more efficient than type A, as the car will use less fuel to cover the same distance. The two researchers would come to different conclusions as they are using different metrics\! But who is right in the above example? The fuel consumption calculation is correct in both cases. The issue is what we care about when we calculate fuel consumption and fuel efficiency / fuel usage. Most people would argue that we care about how much fuel we would need to cover a given distance. In such a case the French researcher is correct as the average is misleading the US researcher. Here is an explanation why: if you take both cars of type A and want to cover 100 kilometers with each of them, you would need not 200 / 2.5 = 80 liters, but 125 liters of petrol (100 liters for the first car and 25 liters for the second). The French will get it right by multiplying 200 x 0.625 = 125. For type B both researchers will correctly estimate that 100 liters will be required for the same task. Therefore, type B is more efficient than type A. However, if you define efficiency as covering the greatest distance given a certain fuel amount, then the US researcher would be correct. If we give each car of type A a liter of fuel, they will cover 5 kilometers combined while giving each car of type B a liter of fuel, they will cover only 4 km combined. It follows that type A is more efficient than type B using this definition. Note that the km/l average is not misleading here, as it is 2.5 km/l, and 2 x 2.5 = 5, which is correct. The above is an illustration of why when using our fuel consumption calculator or similar tools it is important to keep track of the end goal and define the question at hand precisely before measuring and making conclusions. It is also a lesson on applying appropriate data transformations. The arithmetic average is not invariant to monotonic transformations which becomes an issue when averaging the performance of two or more vehicles or when averaging the performance of a single vehicle in different situations. For example, highway fuel consumption and city drive consumption could be used in place of Car 1 and Car 2 in the example table above and produce the same result. The car example uses as a basis one from Hand D. (1994) "Deconstructing Statistical Questions", Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, Vol.157-3:317-356. Fuel consumption calculations are performed using this online calculator. ## How to achieve better fuel efficiency? In brief, the best way to achieve better fuel economy is to: 1. Keep your car and tyres well-maintained 2. Avoid frequent [acceleration](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/acceleration-calculator.php) and deceleration 3. Drive at a lower overall [average speed](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/average-speed-calculator.php) 4. Avoid or reduce the use of air conditioning 5. Reduce the weight of the vehicle by not carrying excess cargo All of the above would reduce the amount of fuel consumed per unit of distance covered. For more in-depth advice, check out our list of ways to [improve your fuel economy](https://www.gigacalculator.com/calculators/fuel-calculator.php#fueleconomy).
Shard	145 (laksa)
Root Hash	8008885531124104345
Unparsed URL	com,gigacalculator!www,/calculators/fuel-consumption-calculator.php s443