🕷️ Crawler Inspector

URL Lookup

Direct Parameter Lookup

Raw Queries and Responses

1. Shard Calculation

Query:

Response:

Calculated Shard: 95 (from laksa184)

2. Crawled Status Check

Query:

curl -X POST \
  'http://laksa095.int.ahrefs:8124/' \
  -H 'Content-Type: text/plain' \
  -H 'X-ClickHouse-Database: crawler3' \
  -H 'Authorization: Basic YXBpOg==' \
  -d 'SELECT getAhrefsURLFromUnparsed(src_unparsed) AS found_url, ifNull(toUnixTimestamp(download_stamp), 0) AS crawl_time, ifNull(toUnixTimestamp(props_url_first_seen), 0) AS first_indexed_time, download_http_code AS http_code, src_unparsed AS src_unparsed, src_root_hash AS src_root_hash, history_drop_reason AS history_drop_reason, meta_title AS meta_title, meta_descriptions AS meta_descriptions, attrs_boilerpipe_text AS attrs_boilerpipe_text, attrs_markdown AS attrs_markdown, attrs_readable_markdown AS attrs_readable_markdown, meta_canonical AS meta_canonical FROM crawler3.page_info_local FINAL PREWHERE (src_root_hash, src_unparsed) IN ((getAhrefsRootHashFromUnparsed(getAhrefsUnparsedNoserviceFromURL(\'https://www.factcheck.org/2022/01/factchecking-claims-about-the-jan-6-capitol-riot/\')), getAhrefsUnparsedNoserviceFromURL(\'https://www.factcheck.org/2022/01/factchecking-claims-about-the-jan-6-capitol-riot/\'))) FORMAT JSONEachRow'

Response:

{"found_url":"https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2022\/01\/factchecking-claims-about-the-jan-6-capitol-riot\/","crawl_time":1776700625,"first_indexed_time":1641475084,"http_code":200,"src_unparsed":"org,factcheck!www,\/2022\/01\/factchecking-claims-about-the-jan-6-capitol-riot\/ s443","src_root_hash":"9637418184873233095","history_drop_reason":null,"meta_title":"FactChecking Claims About the Jan. 6 Capitol Riot - FactCheck.org","meta_descriptions":[],"attrs_boilerpipe_text":"The Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol was the culmination of months of false claims about election fraud, including a litany recited by then-President Donald Trump in a speech shortly before a mob stormed the building, temporarily halting\nthe counting of electoral votes in a joint session of Congress. \nOn that day — and afterward — we debunked false, misleading and unfounded claims related to the events that day. Here is a summary of our coverage.\nTrump supporters clash with police and security forces at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Photo by Brent Stirton\/Getty Images.\nTrump’s Speech.\nIn a rally near the White House, one year ago, Trump served his supporters a laundry list of bogus claims about election fraud in swing states. Then-President-elect Joe Biden had won the states of Pennsylvania, Georgia and Arizona, but Trump, as he had for weeks, made false statements about illegal votes being counted. We wrote about a dozen claims, including Trump’s falsehood that “66,000 votes in Georgia were cast by individuals under the legal voting age.” The Republican official who oversees Georgia’s voting system said, “The actual number is zero.”\nTrump also claimed that somehow then-Vice President Mike Pence could initiate a process to overturn the election results and declare Trump the winner. While Trump was speaking, Pence\n \nreleased\n \na letter to Congress\nsaying he doesn’t have the right to do that.\n“It is my considered judgment that my oath to support and defend the Constitution constrains me from claiming unilateral authority to determine which electoral votes should be counted and which should not,” Pence, who served as president of the Senate that day, said.\nMany hours after Trump’s speech, at\nabout 3:40 a.m. on Jan. 7, the electoral vote count ended, with\nPence announcing\n \nthat Biden would become the 46th president.\nFor more, see “\nTrump’s Falsehood-Filled ‘Save America’ Rally\n.”\nThe Lead-up to Jan. 6.\nFive days after the riot, House Democrats introduced\n \nlegislation\n \nto impeach Trump, charging him with “inciting violence against the Government of the United States.” The resolution, approved by the House in a \n232-197 vote\nwith\nthe support of 10 Republicans, accused Trump of\nrepeatedly issuing “false statements asserting that the Presidential election results were the product of widespread fraud and should not be accepted by the American people or certified by State or Federal officials.”\nWe had been writing about such claims for months, and we compiled a sampling of\nTrump’s comments and actions leading up to the impeachment vote, starting with his\nApril 7, 2020, comments\nthat “mail ballots” were “very dangerous” and “fraudulent in many cases.”\nFor more, see “\nRoad to a Second Impeachment\n.”\nNational Guard Deployment.\nNational Guard members didn’t arrive at the Capitol on Jan. 6 until about 5:40 p.m., when most of the violence had already subsided. \nIn a \nrecorded video\nthe following day, Trump claimed that he “immediately deployed the National Guard and federal law enforcement to secure the building and expel the intruders.” But that was contradicted by news reports citing unnamed sources who say Trump resisted efforts to bring in the Guard at the outset of the riot. In a Jan. 13 article, we chronicled what was known at the time about the Guard’s deployment. \nFor more, see “\nTimeline of National Guard Deployment to Capitol\n.”\nBlaming Pelosi.\nOver the summer, House Republicans tried to shift blame for the breach of the Capitol to Speaker Nancy Pelosi, saying she was “ultimately responsible for the breakdown of security.” But we found their arguments overstated the role of the House speaker in overseeing security of the Capitol and relied on speculation.\nHouse Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy suggested, without evidence, that prior to Jan. 6, 2021, Pelosi played a role in denying a request to use National Guard members at the Capitol that day. (Trump also pushed this idea in a\nJan. 4 statement\nthis year.) Rep. Rodney Davis pointed to the fact that on the afternoon of Jan. 6, the House sergeant at arms sought Pelosi’s permission to bring in the National Guard as evidence that Pelosi was “calling the shots on all of their actions.” A Pelosi aide confirmed the request was made but said the speaker “expects security professionals to make security decisions” and that she only expects “to be briefed about those decisions.” The request also went to then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, and while both Pelosi and McConnell OK’d bringing in the Guard, the Department of Defense still needed to approve the move.\nFor more, see “\nRepublicans’ Shaky, No Evidence Attempt to Cast Blame on Pelosi for Jan. 6\n.”\nHow Many Died?\n In October, Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez\ntweeted\nthat the Capitol riot resulted in\n“almost 10 dead.”\nThere is reasoned debate about the number who died as a result of the riot. Ocasio-Cortez includes four law enforcement officials who responded to the Capitol that day and committed suicide in the days and months afterward and\ntwo rally participants who died of heart failure. Another rallygoer was initially believed to have been trampled to death but was later determined to have died of an accidental overdose.\nWe explained what is publicly known about the deaths of the nine people included in the congresswoman’s tally.\nFor more, see “\nHow Many Died as a Result of Capitol Riot?\n”\nUnfounded Theory on FBI Informants.\nAnother no-evidence claim is the idea that “unindicted co-conspirators” mentioned in federal indictments related to the Capitol riot are undercover FBI agents or informants, as conservative outlets have claimed or suggested. Legal experts and federal case law say that government agents and informants cannot be labeled conspirators to a crime.\nDuring\n \nhis\n \nJune 15\nFox News\nshow, for example, host Tucker Carlson, referencing a story from a conservative website, first\nsaid\n“potentially” and “almost certainly” FBI agents were involved, and then definitively declared that “FBI operatives were organizing the attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6.” Republicans in Congress have pushed the unfounded theory as well, including Reps.\nMarjorie Taylor Greene and Matt Gaetz. \nFederal case law\n from the 1985 case United States v. Rodriguez acknowledged that “government agents and informers cannot be conspirators.”\nFor more, see “\nConservative Outlets Advance Unfounded Theory About Capitol Attack\n.”\nFalse Claims About Police.\nOne social media meme spread the false claim that a Washington, D.C., police officer who responded to the Capitol breach was really part of the rioting crowd. The side-by-side photos show two different people who bear some resemblance to each other. Another claim that circulated on social media falsely said a video clip proves that “Capitol Police gave protesters OK” to enter the building. And other posts made the unfounded claim that Pelosi “won’t let Capitol Police testify about what happened Jan. 6.” In fact, on July 27, four members of the Capitol Police\ntestified\n at the first hearing of the Jan. 6 House select committee.\nFor more, see “\nMemes Misidentify D.C. Police Officer as Jan. 6 Protester\n,” “\nVideo Doesn’t Prove Capitol Police Allowed Jan. 6 Protesters to Enter Capitol\n” and “\nCapitol Police Expected to Testify During House Committee’s Probe of Jan. 6 Riot\n.”\nImpeachment Vote Sparks Misleading Democratic Ads.\nThe\nDemocratic Congressional Campaign Committee used Republican lawmakers’ votes against impeaching Trump to claim eight lawmakers “stood with Q, not you,” a reference to QAnon, whose acolytes baselessly think a group of elite pedophiles runs the government and the entertainment industry. N\none of the targeted Republicans is known to be an actual supporter of\nQAnon, and\nthree of them\nsupported\na resolution to censure Trump for the role he played in the attack on the Capitol.\nFor more, see “\nMisleading DCCC Ads Link Republicans to QAnon\n.”\nBipartisan Report Didn’t ‘Single Out’ Trump\n. In the summer, a bipartisan group of four senators released a report on the security and intelligence failures related to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. All four — Democratic Sens. Amy Klobuchar and Gary Peters, and Republican Sens. Roy Blunt and Rob Portman — have previously said that Trump was at least partly responsible for the attack, but their report did not “single out” Trump “for inciting … the riots,” as a Facebook post from a liberal advocacy group suggested.\nThe report did not examine Trump’s role in, or fault him for, the attack. It was “limited in scope” and did not address “what motivated people,” Peters said.\nFor more, see “\nFacebook Post Misleads on Bipartisan Capitol Attack Report and Interview\n.”\nSome Protesters Were ‘Armed.’\n Social media posts also misleadingly claimed the attack on the Capitol was not an “armed” insurrection, citing FBI testimony that no guns were seized from suspects that day. But 23 people were charged with having deadly or dangerous weapons during the assault — including a loaded handgun found on a man arrested on Capitol grounds. Other weapons included baseball bats, chemical sprays, a captured police officer’s riot shield, a crowbar, fire extinguishers and a metal flagpole.\nIn \nlegal terms\n, “armed” means being in possession of any weapon, not just a gun. \nFor more, see “\nCapitol Protesters Were Armed With Variety of Weapons\n.”\nCapitol Police’s Tampa Office.\n In July, the U.S. Capitol Police\n \nannounced\n \nit would add field offices in Tampa and San Francisco to investigate threats against members of Congress, part of changes the agency was making in the wake of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz criticized the move, saying he was “i\nncreasingly concerned that our federal government and many elements within it are using these exquisite national security authorities to turn against our own people.”\nAn online \nChange.org petition\n, now with nearly 3,000 signatures,\n \ndemanded the removal of the field office in Tampa, claiming it\n \nwas created “in order to further investigate the events at the Capitol on January 6, 2021.” \nBut a Capitol Police spokesperson told us that while many plans announced in the July press release were related to reviews of the events of Jan. 6, the plan for field offices long predated the Capitol riot. “The false narrative that this was created after the 6\nth\n \nto go after people who breached the Capitol, that is not accurate,” the spokesperson told us in a phone interview.\nFor more, see “\nThe Facts on Capitol Police’s Tampa Office\n.”\nAll of our articles related to the Jan. 6 attack can be found\nhere\n.\nE\nditor’s note:\n \nFactCheck.org does not accept advertising. We rely on grants and individual donations from people like you. Please consider a donation. Credit card donations may be made through\n \nour “Donate” page\n. If you prefer to give by check, send to: FactCheck.org, Annenberg Public Policy Center, 202 S. 36th St., Philadelphia, PA 19104.","attrs_markdown":"[Skip to main content](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2022\/01\/factchecking-claims-about-the-jan-6-capitol-riot\/#main)\n\n[FactCheck.org®](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/)\n\nA Project of The Annenberg Public Policy Center\n\n[![Become a Facebook fan](https:\/\/cdn.factcheck.org\/UploadedFiles\/fc-icon-facebook-mini.png)](https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/factcheck.org)\n\n[![Follow us on Twitter](https:\/\/cdn.factcheck.org\/UploadedFiles\/x-icon-logo-black.png)](https:\/\/www.x.com\/factcheckdotorg)\n\n[![Get the RSS feed](https:\/\/cdn.factcheck.org\/UploadedFiles\/fc-icon-rss.png)](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/feed\/)\n\n[![Follow on Insta](https:\/\/cdn.factcheck.org\/UploadedFiles\/fc-icon-instagram-1.png)](https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/factcheckorg\/)\n\n[![Sign up for the email newsletter](https:\/\/cdn.factcheck.org\/UploadedFiles\/fc-icon-email.png)](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/subscribe\/)\n\n[![Help us hold politicians accountable. ](https:\/\/cdn.factcheck.org\/UploadedFiles\/fc-icon-donate.png)](https:\/\/giving.aws.cloud.upenn.edu\/?fastStart=simpleForm&program=ANS&fund=602014)\n\n[FactCheck.org®](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/)\n\n- [Home](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/ \"Home\")\n- [Articles](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2022\/01\/factchecking-claims-about-the-jan-6-capitol-riot\/ \"Articles\")\n  - [FactCheck Posts](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/the-factcheck-wire\/ \"FactCheck Posts\")\n  - [SciCheck](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/scicheck\/ \"SciCheck\")\n  - [En Español](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/es\/en-espanol\/ \"En Español\")\n  - [Project 2025 series](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/issue\/project-2025-series\/ \"Project 2025 series\")\n  - [Debunking Viral Claims](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/fake-news\/ \"Debunking Viral Claims\")\n- [Ask a Question](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2022\/01\/factchecking-claims-about-the-jan-6-capitol-riot\/ \"Ask a Question\")\n  - [Ask FactCheck](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/askfactcheck\/ \"Ask FactCheck\")\n  - [Ask SciCheck](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/askscicheck\/ \"Ask SciCheck\")\n- [Donate](https:\/\/giving.aws.cloud.upenn.edu\/fund?fastStart=simpleForm&program=ANS&fund=602014 \"Donate\")\n- [Topics](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2022\/01\/factchecking-claims-about-the-jan-6-capitol-riot\/ \"Topics\")\n  - [President Trump](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/person\/donald-trump\/ \"President Trump\")\n  - [Robert F. Kennedy Jr.](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/person\/robert-f-kennedy-jr\/ \"Robert F. Kennedy Jr.\")\n  - [immigration](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/issue\/immigration\/ \"immigration\")\n  - [climate change](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/issue\/climate-change\/ \"climate change\")\n  - [coronavirus](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/issue\/coronavirus\/ \"coronavirus\")\n  - [tariffs](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/issue\/tariffs\/ \"tariffs\")\n  - [View All](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/archives\/ \"View All\")\n- [About Us](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2022\/01\/factchecking-claims-about-the-jan-6-capitol-riot\/ \"About Us\")\n  - [Our Mission](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/about\/our-mission\/ \"Our Mission\")\n  - [Our Process](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/our-process\/ \"Our Process\")\n  - [Our Funding](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/our-funding\/ \"Our Funding\")\n  - [Our Staff](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/our-staff\/ \"Our Staff\")\n  - [Undergraduate Fellows](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/undergraduate-fellows\/ \"Undergraduate Fellows\")\n  - [Awards](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/awards\/ \"Awards\")\n  - [Request a Correction](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/request-a-correction\/ \"Request a Correction\")\n  - [Contact Us](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/about\/contact-us\/ \"Contact Us\")\n- [Search](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/search\/ \"Search\")\n- [More](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2022\/01\/factchecking-claims-about-the-jan-6-capitol-riot\/ \"More\")\n  - [Viral Claims](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/hot-topics\/ \"Viral Claims\")\n  - [Newsletter](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/subscribe\/ \"Newsletter\")\n  - [Instagram](https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/factcheckorg\/ \"Instagram\")\n  - [Threads](https:\/\/www.threads.net\/@factcheckorg \"Threads\")\n  - [YouTube](https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/factcheckdotorg \"YouTube\")\n  - [TikTok](https:\/\/www.tiktok.com\/@factcheckorg \"TikTok\")\n  - [Facebook](https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/factcheck.org \"Facebook\")\n  - [X](https:\/\/twitter.com\/factcheckdotorg \"X\")\n  - [FactCheck On the Air](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/on-the-air\/ \"FactCheck On the Air\")\n\n[FactCheck Posts](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/the-factcheck-wire\/) › [Featured Posts](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/featured-posts\/)\n\n# FactChecking Claims About the Jan. 6 Capitol Riot\nBy [Lori Robertson](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/author\/lori-robertson\/ \"Posts by Lori Robertson\")\n\nPosted on January 6, 2022\n***\nThe Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol was the culmination of months of false claims about election fraud, including a litany recited by then-President Donald Trump in a speech shortly before a mob stormed the building, temporarily halting the counting of electoral votes in a joint session of Congress.\n\nOn that day — and afterward — we debunked false, misleading and unfounded claims related to the events that day. Here is a summary of our coverage.\n\n[![](https:\/\/cdn.factcheck.org\/UploadedFiles\/Getty-capitol-riot-story.jpg)](https:\/\/cdn.factcheck.org\/UploadedFiles\/Getty-capitol-riot-story.jpg)\n\nTrump supporters clash with police and security forces at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Photo by Brent Stirton\/Getty Images.\n\n**Trump’s Speech.** In a rally near the White House, one year ago, Trump served his supporters a laundry list of bogus claims about election fraud in swing states. Then-President-elect Joe Biden had won the states of Pennsylvania, Georgia and Arizona, but Trump, as he had for weeks, made false statements about illegal votes being counted. We wrote about a dozen claims, including Trump’s falsehood that “66,000 votes in Georgia were cast by individuals under the legal voting age.” The Republican official who oversees Georgia’s voting system said, “The actual number is zero.”\n\nTrump also claimed that somehow then-Vice President Mike Pence could initiate a process to overturn the election results and declare Trump the winner. While Trump was speaking, Pence [released](https:\/\/pbs.twimg.com\/media\/ErESrZQXcAIshEA.jpg) [a letter to Congress](https:\/\/pbs.twimg.com\/media\/ErESrZNWMAAS0f9.jpg) saying he doesn’t have the right to do that.\n\n“It is my considered judgment that my oath to support and defend the Constitution constrains me from claiming unilateral authority to determine which electoral votes should be counted and which should not,” Pence, who served as president of the Senate that day, said.\n\nMany hours after Trump’s speech, at about 3:40 a.m. on Jan. 7, the electoral vote count ended, with [Pence announcing](https:\/\/www.cbsnews.com\/live-updates\/electoral-college-vote-count-biden-victory\/) that Biden would become the 46th president.\n\nFor more, see “[Trump’s Falsehood-Filled ‘Save America’ Rally](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2021\/01\/trumps-falsehood-filled-save-america-rally\/).”\n\n**The Lead-up to Jan. 6.** Five days after the riot, House Democrats introduced [legislation](https:\/\/degette.house.gov\/sites\/degette.house.gov\/files\/ARTICLES%20-%20Final%20.pdf) to impeach Trump, charging him with “inciting violence against the Government of the United States.” The resolution, approved by the House in a [232-197 vote](https:\/\/clerk.house.gov\/evs\/2021\/roll017.xml) with the support of 10 Republicans, accused Trump of repeatedly issuing “false statements asserting that the Presidential election results were the product of widespread fraud and should not be accepted by the American people or certified by State or Federal officials.”\n\nWe had been writing about such claims for months, and we compiled a sampling of Trump’s comments and actions leading up to the impeachment vote, starting with his [April 7, 2020, comments](https:\/\/trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov\/briefings-statements\/remarks-president-trump-vice-president-pence-members-coronavirus-task-force-press-briefing-april-7-2020\/) that “mail ballots” were “very dangerous” and “fraudulent in many cases.”\n\nFor more, see “[Road to a Second Impeachment](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2021\/01\/road-to-a-second-impeachment\/).”\n\n**National Guard Deployment.** National Guard members didn’t arrive at the Capitol on Jan. 6 until about 5:40 p.m., when most of the violence had already subsided. In a [recorded video](https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=DHvlC8RRNNk&feature=emb_logo) the following day, Trump claimed that he “immediately deployed the National Guard and federal law enforcement to secure the building and expel the intruders.” But that was contradicted by news reports citing unnamed sources who say Trump resisted efforts to bring in the Guard at the outset of the riot. In a Jan. 13 article, we chronicled what was known at the time about the Guard’s deployment.\n\nFor more, see “[Timeline of National Guard Deployment to Capitol](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2021\/01\/timeline-of-national-guard-deployment-to-capitol\/).”\n\n**Blaming Pelosi.** Over the summer, House Republicans tried to shift blame for the breach of the Capitol to Speaker Nancy Pelosi, saying she was “ultimately responsible for the breakdown of security.” But we found their arguments overstated the role of the House speaker in overseeing security of the Capitol and relied on speculation.\n\nHouse Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy suggested, without evidence, that prior to Jan. 6, 2021, Pelosi played a role in denying a request to use National Guard members at the Capitol that day. (Trump also pushed this idea in a [Jan. 4 statement](https:\/\/www.donaldjtrump.com\/news\/news-srmyqt7ufn0) this year.) Rep. Rodney Davis pointed to the fact that on the afternoon of Jan. 6, the House sergeant at arms sought Pelosi’s permission to bring in the National Guard as evidence that Pelosi was “calling the shots on all of their actions.” A Pelosi aide confirmed the request was made but said the speaker “expects security professionals to make security decisions” and that she only expects “to be briefed about those decisions.” The request also went to then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, and while both Pelosi and McConnell OK’d bringing in the Guard, the Department of Defense still needed to approve the move.\n\nFor more, see “[Republicans’ Shaky, No Evidence Attempt to Cast Blame on Pelosi for Jan. 6](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2021\/07\/republicans-shaky-no-evidence-attempt-to-cast-blame-on-pelosi-for-jan-6\/).”\n\n**How Many Died?** In October, Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez [tweeted](https:\/\/twitter.com\/AOC\/status\/1452459627187216388) that the Capitol riot resulted in “almost 10 dead.” There is reasoned debate about the number who died as a result of the riot. Ocasio-Cortez includes four law enforcement officials who responded to the Capitol that day and committed suicide in the days and months afterward and two rally participants who died of heart failure. Another rallygoer was initially believed to have been trampled to death but was later determined to have died of an accidental overdose.\n\nWe explained what is publicly known about the deaths of the nine people included in the congresswoman’s tally.\n\nFor more, see “[How Many Died as a Result of Capitol Riot?](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2021\/11\/how-many-died-as-a-result-of-capitol-riot\/)”\n\n**Unfounded Theory on FBI Informants.** Another no-evidence claim is the idea that “unindicted co-conspirators” mentioned in federal indictments related to the Capitol riot are undercover FBI agents or informants, as conservative outlets have claimed or suggested. Legal experts and federal case law say that government agents and informants cannot be labeled conspirators to a crime.\n\nDuring his June 15 Fox News show, for example, host Tucker Carlson, referencing a story from a conservative website, first [said](https:\/\/archive.org\/details\/FOXNEWSW_20210616_050000_Tucker_Carlson_Tonight\/start\/360\/end\/420) “potentially” and “almost certainly” FBI agents were involved, and then definitively declared that “FBI operatives were organizing the attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6.” Republicans in Congress have pushed the unfounded theory as well, including Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene and Matt Gaetz.\n\n[Federal case law](https:\/\/casetext.com\/case\/united-states-v-rodriguez-42) from the 1985 case United States v. Rodriguez acknowledged that “government agents and informers cannot be conspirators.”\n\nFor more, see “[Conservative Outlets Advance Unfounded Theory About Capitol Attack](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2021\/06\/conservative-outlets-advance-unfounded-theory-about-capitol-attack\/).”\n\n**False Claims About Police.** One social media meme spread the false claim that a Washington, D.C., police officer who responded to the Capitol breach was really part of the rioting crowd. The side-by-side photos show two different people who bear some resemblance to each other. Another claim that circulated on social media falsely said a video clip proves that “Capitol Police gave protesters OK” to enter the building. And other posts made the unfounded claim that Pelosi “won’t let Capitol Police testify about what happened Jan. 6.” In fact, on July 27, four members of the Capitol Police [testified](https:\/\/www.rev.com\/blog\/transcripts\/january-6-house-select-committee-hearing-investigation-day-1-full-transcript) at the first hearing of the Jan. 6 House select committee.\n\nFor more, see “[Memes Misidentify D.C. Police Officer as Jan. 6 Protester](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2021\/08\/memes-misidentify-d-c-police-officer-as-jan-6-protester\/),” “[Video Doesn’t Prove Capitol Police Allowed Jan. 6 Protesters to Enter Capitol](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2021\/05\/video-doesnt-prove-capitol-police-allowed-jan-6-protesters-to-enter-capitol\/)” and “[Capitol Police Expected to Testify During House Committee’s Probe of Jan. 6 Riot](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2021\/07\/capitol-police-expected-to-testify-during-house-committees-probe-of-jan-6-riot\/).”\n\n**Impeachment Vote Sparks Misleading Democratic Ads.** The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee used Republican lawmakers’ votes against impeaching Trump to claim eight lawmakers “stood with Q, not you,” a reference to QAnon, whose acolytes baselessly think a group of elite pedophiles runs the government and the entertainment industry. None of the targeted Republicans is known to be an actual supporter of QAnon, and three of them [supported](https:\/\/www.congress.gov\/bill\/117th-congress\/house-concurrent-resolution\/5\/cosponsors?r=9&s=2&searchResultViewType=expanded) a resolution to censure Trump for the role he played in the attack on the Capitol.\n\nFor more, see “[Misleading DCCC Ads Link Republicans to QAnon](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2021\/02\/misleading-dccc-ads-link-republicans-to-qanon\/).”\n\n**Bipartisan Report Didn’t ‘Single Out’ Trump**. In the summer, a bipartisan group of four senators released a report on the security and intelligence failures related to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. All four — Democratic Sens. Amy Klobuchar and Gary Peters, and Republican Sens. Roy Blunt and Rob Portman — have previously said that Trump was at least partly responsible for the attack, but their report did not “single out” Trump “for inciting … the riots,” as a Facebook post from a liberal advocacy group suggested.\n\nThe report did not examine Trump’s role in, or fault him for, the attack. It was “limited in scope” and did not address “what motivated people,” Peters said.\n\nFor more, see “[Facebook Post Misleads on Bipartisan Capitol Attack Report and Interview](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2021\/06\/facebook-post-misleads-on-bipartisan-capital-attack-report-and-interview\/).”\n\n**Some Protesters Were ‘Armed.’** Social media posts also misleadingly claimed the attack on the Capitol was not an “armed” insurrection, citing FBI testimony that no guns were seized from suspects that day. But 23 people were charged with having deadly or dangerous weapons during the assault — including a loaded handgun found on a man arrested on Capitol grounds. Other weapons included baseball bats, chemical sprays, a captured police officer’s riot shield, a crowbar, fire extinguishers and a metal flagpole. In legal terms, “armed” means being in possession of any weapon, not just a gun.\n\nFor more, see “[Capitol Protesters Were Armed With Variety of Weapons](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2021\/03\/capitol-protesters-were-armed-with-variety-of-weapons\/).”\n\n**Capitol Police’s Tampa Office.** In July, the U.S. Capitol Police [announced](https:\/\/www.uscp.gov\/media-center\/press-releases\/after-attack-future-us-capitol-police) it would add field offices in Tampa and San Francisco to investigate threats against members of Congress, part of changes the agency was making in the wake of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz criticized the move, saying he was “increasingly concerned that our federal government and many elements within it are using these exquisite national security authorities to turn against our own people.”\n\nAn online [Change.org petition](https:\/\/www.change.org\/p\/ron-desantis-demand-the-immediate-removal-of-the-united-states-capitol-police-field-office-in-tampa?redirect=false), now with nearly 3,000 signatures, demanded the removal of the field office in Tampa, claiming it was created “in order to further investigate the events at the Capitol on January 6, 2021.” But a Capitol Police spokesperson told us that while many plans announced in the July press release were related to reviews of the events of Jan. 6, the plan for field offices long predated the Capitol riot. “The false narrative that this was created after the 6th to go after people who breached the Capitol, that is not accurate,” the spokesperson told us in a phone interview.\n\nFor more, see “[The Facts on Capitol Police’s Tampa Office](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2021\/08\/the-facts-on-capitol-polices-tampa-office\/).”\n\nAll of our articles related to the Jan. 6 attack can be found [here](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/issue\/capitol-riot\/).\n\n*E**ditor’s note:* *FactCheck.org does not accept advertising. We rely on grants and individual donations from people like you. Please consider a donation. Credit card donations may be made through [our “Donate” page](https:\/\/giving.aws.cloud.upenn.edu\/?fastStart=simpleForm&program=ANS&fund=602014). If you prefer to give by check, send to: FactCheck.org, Annenberg Public Policy Center, 202 S. 36th St., Philadelphia, PA 19104.*\n\n- Categories\n  - [FactCheck Posts](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/the-factcheck-wire\/)\n  - [Featured Posts](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/featured-posts\/)\n- Issue\n  - [capitol riot](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/issue\/capitol-riot\/)\n- People\n  - [Donald Trump](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/person\/donald-trump\/)\n***\n[Previous StoryOur Most Popular Articles in 2021](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2021\/12\/our-most-popular-articles-in-2021\/)\n\n[Next StoryDeath of Betty White Leads to Swirl of Falsehoods on Social Media](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2022\/01\/scicheck-death-of-betty-white-leads-to-swirl-of-falsehoods-on-social-media\/)\n***\n\nAsk FactCheck\n\n**Q: How real is birth tourism?**\n\n**A:** **The government doesn’t provide estimates of the extent of so-called birth tourism — pregnant women coming to the U.S. on tourism visas in order to obtain birthright U.S. citizenship for their newborn child. One outside group has estimated it may be more than 20,000 births per year. Some argue it’s not common enough to justify upending longstanding birthright citizenship policies.**\n\n[Read the full question and answer](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2026\/04\/what-do-we-know-about-birth-tourism\/)\n\n[View the Ask FactCheck archives](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/askfactcheck\/)\n\nHave a question? [Ask us.](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/ask-factcheck\/ask-us-a-question\/)\n\n[Donate Now Because facts matter.](https:\/\/giving.aws.cloud.upenn.edu\/?fastStart=simpleForm&program=ANS&fund=602014 \"Because facts matter.\")\n\n[![SciCheck's COVID-19\/Vaccination Project](https:\/\/cdn.factcheck.org\/UploadedFiles\/misconceptions2.png) SciCheck's COVID-19\/Vaccination Project Preempting and exposing vaccination and COVID-19 misinformation.](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/covid-misconceptions\/)\n\n[![Proyecto de Vacunación\/COVID-19](https:\/\/cdn.factcheck.org\/UploadedFiles\/misconceptions2.png) Proyecto de Vacunación\/COVID-19 Precaviendo y exponiendo la desinformación sobre el COVID-19 y sus vacunas](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/es\/covid-misconceptions\/)\n\n[![SciCheck](https:\/\/cdn.factcheck.org\/UploadedFiles\/fc-icon-scicheck.png) SciCheck Fact-checking science-based claims.](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/scicheck\/)\n\n[![Viral Spiral](https:\/\/cdn.factcheck.org\/UploadedFiles\/fc-icon-viralspiral.png) Viral Spiral Don’t get spun by internet rumors.](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/hot-topics\/)\n\n[![Newsletter](https:\/\/cdn.factcheck.org\/UploadedFiles\/fc-icon-signup.png) Newsletter Get our free weekly email.](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/subscribe)\n\n[![Mailbag](https:\/\/cdn.factcheck.org\/UploadedFiles\/fc-icon-mailbag.png) Mailbag Letters from our readers.](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/factcheck-mailbag\/)\n\n[![On the Air](https:\/\/cdn.factcheck.org\/UploadedFiles\/fc-icon-ota.png) On the Air Our staff on TV and radio.](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/on-the-air)\n\n[![NewsFeed Defenders](https:\/\/cdn.factcheck.org\/UploadedFiles\/factchecksidebar_icon-1.png) NewsFeed Defenders A media literacy game to detect misinformation.](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/newsfeed-defenders\/)\n\n- [Archives](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/archives\/)\n- [Privacy](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/privacy\/)\n- [Copyright Policy](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/copyright-policy\/)\n- [Contact Us](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/about\/contact-us\/)\n- [Report Accessibility Issues and Get Help](https:\/\/accessibility.web-resources.upenn.edu\/get-help)\n\n© Copyright 2026 FactCheck.org ®  \nA Project of The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania","attrs_readable_markdown":"The Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol was the culmination of months of false claims about election fraud, including a litany recited by then-President Donald Trump in a speech shortly before a mob stormed the building, temporarily halting the counting of electoral votes in a joint session of Congress.\n\nOn that day — and afterward — we debunked false, misleading and unfounded claims related to the events that day. Here is a summary of our coverage.\n\n[![](https:\/\/cdn.factcheck.org\/UploadedFiles\/Getty-capitol-riot-story.jpg)](https:\/\/cdn.factcheck.org\/UploadedFiles\/Getty-capitol-riot-story.jpg)\n\nTrump supporters clash with police and security forces at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Photo by Brent Stirton\/Getty Images.\n\n**Trump’s Speech.** In a rally near the White House, one year ago, Trump served his supporters a laundry list of bogus claims about election fraud in swing states. Then-President-elect Joe Biden had won the states of Pennsylvania, Georgia and Arizona, but Trump, as he had for weeks, made false statements about illegal votes being counted. We wrote about a dozen claims, including Trump’s falsehood that “66,000 votes in Georgia were cast by individuals under the legal voting age.” The Republican official who oversees Georgia’s voting system said, “The actual number is zero.”\n\nTrump also claimed that somehow then-Vice President Mike Pence could initiate a process to overturn the election results and declare Trump the winner. While Trump was speaking, Pence [released](https:\/\/pbs.twimg.com\/media\/ErESrZQXcAIshEA.jpg) [a letter to Congress](https:\/\/pbs.twimg.com\/media\/ErESrZNWMAAS0f9.jpg) saying he doesn’t have the right to do that.\n\n“It is my considered judgment that my oath to support and defend the Constitution constrains me from claiming unilateral authority to determine which electoral votes should be counted and which should not,” Pence, who served as president of the Senate that day, said.\n\nMany hours after Trump’s speech, at about 3:40 a.m. on Jan. 7, the electoral vote count ended, with [Pence announcing](https:\/\/www.cbsnews.com\/live-updates\/electoral-college-vote-count-biden-victory\/) that Biden would become the 46th president.\n\nFor more, see “[Trump’s Falsehood-Filled ‘Save America’ Rally](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2021\/01\/trumps-falsehood-filled-save-america-rally\/).”\n\n**The Lead-up to Jan. 6.** Five days after the riot, House Democrats introduced [legislation](https:\/\/degette.house.gov\/sites\/degette.house.gov\/files\/ARTICLES%20-%20Final%20.pdf) to impeach Trump, charging him with “inciting violence against the Government of the United States.” The resolution, approved by the House in a [232-197 vote](https:\/\/clerk.house.gov\/evs\/2021\/roll017.xml) with the support of 10 Republicans, accused Trump of repeatedly issuing “false statements asserting that the Presidential election results were the product of widespread fraud and should not be accepted by the American people or certified by State or Federal officials.”\n\nWe had been writing about such claims for months, and we compiled a sampling of Trump’s comments and actions leading up to the impeachment vote, starting with his [April 7, 2020, comments](https:\/\/trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov\/briefings-statements\/remarks-president-trump-vice-president-pence-members-coronavirus-task-force-press-briefing-april-7-2020\/) that “mail ballots” were “very dangerous” and “fraudulent in many cases.”\n\nFor more, see “[Road to a Second Impeachment](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2021\/01\/road-to-a-second-impeachment\/).”\n\n**National Guard Deployment.** National Guard members didn’t arrive at the Capitol on Jan. 6 until about 5:40 p.m., when most of the violence had already subsided. In a [recorded video](https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=DHvlC8RRNNk&feature=emb_logo) the following day, Trump claimed that he “immediately deployed the National Guard and federal law enforcement to secure the building and expel the intruders.” But that was contradicted by news reports citing unnamed sources who say Trump resisted efforts to bring in the Guard at the outset of the riot. In a Jan. 13 article, we chronicled what was known at the time about the Guard’s deployment.\n\nFor more, see “[Timeline of National Guard Deployment to Capitol](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2021\/01\/timeline-of-national-guard-deployment-to-capitol\/).”\n\n**Blaming Pelosi.** Over the summer, House Republicans tried to shift blame for the breach of the Capitol to Speaker Nancy Pelosi, saying she was “ultimately responsible for the breakdown of security.” But we found their arguments overstated the role of the House speaker in overseeing security of the Capitol and relied on speculation.\n\nHouse Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy suggested, without evidence, that prior to Jan. 6, 2021, Pelosi played a role in denying a request to use National Guard members at the Capitol that day. (Trump also pushed this idea in a [Jan. 4 statement](https:\/\/www.donaldjtrump.com\/news\/news-srmyqt7ufn0) this year.) Rep. Rodney Davis pointed to the fact that on the afternoon of Jan. 6, the House sergeant at arms sought Pelosi’s permission to bring in the National Guard as evidence that Pelosi was “calling the shots on all of their actions.” A Pelosi aide confirmed the request was made but said the speaker “expects security professionals to make security decisions” and that she only expects “to be briefed about those decisions.” The request also went to then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, and while both Pelosi and McConnell OK’d bringing in the Guard, the Department of Defense still needed to approve the move.\n\nFor more, see “[Republicans’ Shaky, No Evidence Attempt to Cast Blame on Pelosi for Jan. 6](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2021\/07\/republicans-shaky-no-evidence-attempt-to-cast-blame-on-pelosi-for-jan-6\/).”\n\n**How Many Died?** In October, Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez [tweeted](https:\/\/twitter.com\/AOC\/status\/1452459627187216388) that the Capitol riot resulted in “almost 10 dead.” There is reasoned debate about the number who died as a result of the riot. Ocasio-Cortez includes four law enforcement officials who responded to the Capitol that day and committed suicide in the days and months afterward and two rally participants who died of heart failure. Another rallygoer was initially believed to have been trampled to death but was later determined to have died of an accidental overdose.\n\nWe explained what is publicly known about the deaths of the nine people included in the congresswoman’s tally.\n\nFor more, see “[How Many Died as a Result of Capitol Riot?](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2021\/11\/how-many-died-as-a-result-of-capitol-riot\/)”\n\n**Unfounded Theory on FBI Informants.** Another no-evidence claim is the idea that “unindicted co-conspirators” mentioned in federal indictments related to the Capitol riot are undercover FBI agents or informants, as conservative outlets have claimed or suggested. Legal experts and federal case law say that government agents and informants cannot be labeled conspirators to a crime.\n\nDuring his June 15 Fox News show, for example, host Tucker Carlson, referencing a story from a conservative website, first [said](https:\/\/archive.org\/details\/FOXNEWSW_20210616_050000_Tucker_Carlson_Tonight\/start\/360\/end\/420) “potentially” and “almost certainly” FBI agents were involved, and then definitively declared that “FBI operatives were organizing the attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6.” Republicans in Congress have pushed the unfounded theory as well, including Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene and Matt Gaetz.\n\n[Federal case law](https:\/\/casetext.com\/case\/united-states-v-rodriguez-42) from the 1985 case United States v. Rodriguez acknowledged that “government agents and informers cannot be conspirators.”\n\nFor more, see “[Conservative Outlets Advance Unfounded Theory About Capitol Attack](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2021\/06\/conservative-outlets-advance-unfounded-theory-about-capitol-attack\/).”\n\n**False Claims About Police.** One social media meme spread the false claim that a Washington, D.C., police officer who responded to the Capitol breach was really part of the rioting crowd. The side-by-side photos show two different people who bear some resemblance to each other. Another claim that circulated on social media falsely said a video clip proves that “Capitol Police gave protesters OK” to enter the building. And other posts made the unfounded claim that Pelosi “won’t let Capitol Police testify about what happened Jan. 6.” In fact, on July 27, four members of the Capitol Police [testified](https:\/\/www.rev.com\/blog\/transcripts\/january-6-house-select-committee-hearing-investigation-day-1-full-transcript) at the first hearing of the Jan. 6 House select committee.\n\nFor more, see “[Memes Misidentify D.C. Police Officer as Jan. 6 Protester](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2021\/08\/memes-misidentify-d-c-police-officer-as-jan-6-protester\/),” “[Video Doesn’t Prove Capitol Police Allowed Jan. 6 Protesters to Enter Capitol](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2021\/05\/video-doesnt-prove-capitol-police-allowed-jan-6-protesters-to-enter-capitol\/)” and “[Capitol Police Expected to Testify During House Committee’s Probe of Jan. 6 Riot](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2021\/07\/capitol-police-expected-to-testify-during-house-committees-probe-of-jan-6-riot\/).”\n\n**Impeachment Vote Sparks Misleading Democratic Ads.** The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee used Republican lawmakers’ votes against impeaching Trump to claim eight lawmakers “stood with Q, not you,” a reference to QAnon, whose acolytes baselessly think a group of elite pedophiles runs the government and the entertainment industry. None of the targeted Republicans is known to be an actual supporter of QAnon, and three of them [supported](https:\/\/www.congress.gov\/bill\/117th-congress\/house-concurrent-resolution\/5\/cosponsors?r=9&s=2&searchResultViewType=expanded) a resolution to censure Trump for the role he played in the attack on the Capitol.\n\nFor more, see “[Misleading DCCC Ads Link Republicans to QAnon](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2021\/02\/misleading-dccc-ads-link-republicans-to-qanon\/).”\n\n**Bipartisan Report Didn’t ‘Single Out’ Trump**. In the summer, a bipartisan group of four senators released a report on the security and intelligence failures related to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. All four — Democratic Sens. Amy Klobuchar and Gary Peters, and Republican Sens. Roy Blunt and Rob Portman — have previously said that Trump was at least partly responsible for the attack, but their report did not “single out” Trump “for inciting … the riots,” as a Facebook post from a liberal advocacy group suggested.\n\nThe report did not examine Trump’s role in, or fault him for, the attack. It was “limited in scope” and did not address “what motivated people,” Peters said.\n\nFor more, see “[Facebook Post Misleads on Bipartisan Capitol Attack Report and Interview](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2021\/06\/facebook-post-misleads-on-bipartisan-capital-attack-report-and-interview\/).”\n\n**Some Protesters Were ‘Armed.’** Social media posts also misleadingly claimed the attack on the Capitol was not an “armed” insurrection, citing FBI testimony that no guns were seized from suspects that day. But 23 people were charged with having deadly or dangerous weapons during the assault — including a loaded handgun found on a man arrested on Capitol grounds. Other weapons included baseball bats, chemical sprays, a captured police officer’s riot shield, a crowbar, fire extinguishers and a metal flagpole. In legal terms, “armed” means being in possession of any weapon, not just a gun.\n\nFor more, see “[Capitol Protesters Were Armed With Variety of Weapons](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2021\/03\/capitol-protesters-were-armed-with-variety-of-weapons\/).”\n\n**Capitol Police’s Tampa Office.** In July, the U.S. Capitol Police [announced](https:\/\/www.uscp.gov\/media-center\/press-releases\/after-attack-future-us-capitol-police) it would add field offices in Tampa and San Francisco to investigate threats against members of Congress, part of changes the agency was making in the wake of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz criticized the move, saying he was “increasingly concerned that our federal government and many elements within it are using these exquisite national security authorities to turn against our own people.”\n\nAn online [Change.org petition](https:\/\/www.change.org\/p\/ron-desantis-demand-the-immediate-removal-of-the-united-states-capitol-police-field-office-in-tampa?redirect=false), now with nearly 3,000 signatures, demanded the removal of the field office in Tampa, claiming it was created “in order to further investigate the events at the Capitol on January 6, 2021.” But a Capitol Police spokesperson told us that while many plans announced in the July press release were related to reviews of the events of Jan. 6, the plan for field offices long predated the Capitol riot. “The false narrative that this was created after the 6th to go after people who breached the Capitol, that is not accurate,” the spokesperson told us in a phone interview.\n\nFor more, see “[The Facts on Capitol Police’s Tampa Office](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2021\/08\/the-facts-on-capitol-polices-tampa-office\/).”\n\nAll of our articles related to the Jan. 6 attack can be found [here](https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/issue\/capitol-riot\/).\n\n*E**ditor’s note:* *FactCheck.org does not accept advertising. We rely on grants and individual donations from people like you. Please consider a donation. Credit card donations may be made through [our “Donate” page](https:\/\/giving.aws.cloud.upenn.edu\/?fastStart=simpleForm&program=ANS&fund=602014). If you prefer to give by check, send to: FactCheck.org, Annenberg Public Policy Center, 202 S. 36th St., Philadelphia, PA 19104.*","meta_canonical":null}

3. Robots.txt Check

Query:

Response:

4. Spam/Ban Check

Query:

Response:

5. Seen Status Check

ℹ️ Skipped - page is already crawled

📄

INDEXABLE

✅

CRAWLED

2 hours ago

🤖

ROBOTS ALLOWED

Page Info Filters

Filter	Status	Condition	Details
HTTP status	PASS	`download_http_code = 200`	HTTP 200
Age cutoff	PASS	`download_stamp > now() - 6 MONTH`	0 months ago
History drop	PASS	`isNull(history_drop_reason)`	No drop reason
Spam/ban	PASS	`fh_dont_index != 1 AND ml_spam_score = 0`	ml_spam_score=0
Canonical	PASS	`meta_canonical IS NULL OR = '' OR = src_unparsed`	Not set

Page Details

Property	Value
URL	https://www.factcheck.org/2022/01/factchecking-claims-about-the-jan-6-capitol-riot/
Last Crawled	2026-04-20 15:57:05 (2 hours ago)
First Indexed	2022-01-06 13:18:04 (4 years ago)
HTTP Status Code	200
Meta Title	FactChecking Claims About the Jan. 6 Capitol Riot - FactCheck.org
Meta Description	null
Meta Canonical	null
Boilerpipe Text	The Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol was the culmination of months of false claims about election fraud, including a litany recited by then-President Donald Trump in a speech shortly before a mob stormed the building, temporarily halting the counting of electoral votes in a joint session of Congress. On that day — and afterward — we debunked false, misleading and unfounded claims related to the events that day. Here is a summary of our coverage. Trump supporters clash with police and security forces at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Photo by Brent Stirton/Getty Images. Trump’s Speech. In a rally near the White House, one year ago, Trump served his supporters a laundry list of bogus claims about election fraud in swing states. Then-President-elect Joe Biden had won the states of Pennsylvania, Georgia and Arizona, but Trump, as he had for weeks, made false statements about illegal votes being counted. We wrote about a dozen claims, including Trump’s falsehood that “66,000 votes in Georgia were cast by individuals under the legal voting age.” The Republican official who oversees Georgia’s voting system said, “The actual number is zero.” Trump also claimed that somehow then-Vice President Mike Pence could initiate a process to overturn the election results and declare Trump the winner. While Trump was speaking, Pence released a letter to Congress saying he doesn’t have the right to do that. “It is my considered judgment that my oath to support and defend the Constitution constrains me from claiming unilateral authority to determine which electoral votes should be counted and which should not,” Pence, who served as president of the Senate that day, said. Many hours after Trump’s speech, at about 3:40 a.m. on Jan. 7, the electoral vote count ended, with Pence announcing that Biden would become the 46th president. For more, see “ Trump’s Falsehood-Filled ‘Save America’ Rally .” The Lead-up to Jan. 6. Five days after the riot, House Democrats introduced legislation to impeach Trump, charging him with “inciting violence against the Government of the United States.” The resolution, approved by the House in a 232-197 vote with the support of 10 Republicans, accused Trump of repeatedly issuing “false statements asserting that the Presidential election results were the product of widespread fraud and should not be accepted by the American people or certified by State or Federal officials.” We had been writing about such claims for months, and we compiled a sampling of Trump’s comments and actions leading up to the impeachment vote, starting with his April 7, 2020, comments that “mail ballots” were “very dangerous” and “fraudulent in many cases.” For more, see “ Road to a Second Impeachment .” National Guard Deployment. National Guard members didn’t arrive at the Capitol on Jan. 6 until about 5:40 p.m., when most of the violence had already subsided. In a recorded video the following day, Trump claimed that he “immediately deployed the National Guard and federal law enforcement to secure the building and expel the intruders.” But that was contradicted by news reports citing unnamed sources who say Trump resisted efforts to bring in the Guard at the outset of the riot. In a Jan. 13 article, we chronicled what was known at the time about the Guard’s deployment. For more, see “ Timeline of National Guard Deployment to Capitol .” Blaming Pelosi. Over the summer, House Republicans tried to shift blame for the breach of the Capitol to Speaker Nancy Pelosi, saying she was “ultimately responsible for the breakdown of security.” But we found their arguments overstated the role of the House speaker in overseeing security of the Capitol and relied on speculation. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy suggested, without evidence, that prior to Jan. 6, 2021, Pelosi played a role in denying a request to use National Guard members at the Capitol that day. (Trump also pushed this idea in a Jan. 4 statement this year.) Rep. Rodney Davis pointed to the fact that on the afternoon of Jan. 6, the House sergeant at arms sought Pelosi’s permission to bring in the National Guard as evidence that Pelosi was “calling the shots on all of their actions.” A Pelosi aide confirmed the request was made but said the speaker “expects security professionals to make security decisions” and that she only expects “to be briefed about those decisions.” The request also went to then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, and while both Pelosi and McConnell OK’d bringing in the Guard, the Department of Defense still needed to approve the move. For more, see “ Republicans’ Shaky, No Evidence Attempt to Cast Blame on Pelosi for Jan. 6 .” How Many Died? In October, Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez tweeted that the Capitol riot resulted in “almost 10 dead.” There is reasoned debate about the number who died as a result of the riot. Ocasio-Cortez includes four law enforcement officials who responded to the Capitol that day and committed suicide in the days and months afterward and two rally participants who died of heart failure. Another rallygoer was initially believed to have been trampled to death but was later determined to have died of an accidental overdose. We explained what is publicly known about the deaths of the nine people included in the congresswoman’s tally. For more, see “ How Many Died as a Result of Capitol Riot? ” Unfounded Theory on FBI Informants. Another no-evidence claim is the idea that “unindicted co-conspirators” mentioned in federal indictments related to the Capitol riot are undercover FBI agents or informants, as conservative outlets have claimed or suggested. Legal experts and federal case law say that government agents and informants cannot be labeled conspirators to a crime. During his June 15 Fox News show, for example, host Tucker Carlson, referencing a story from a conservative website, first said “potentially” and “almost certainly” FBI agents were involved, and then definitively declared that “FBI operatives were organizing the attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6.” Republicans in Congress have pushed the unfounded theory as well, including Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene and Matt Gaetz. Federal case law from the 1985 case United States v. Rodriguez acknowledged that “government agents and informers cannot be conspirators.” For more, see “ Conservative Outlets Advance Unfounded Theory About Capitol Attack .” False Claims About Police. One social media meme spread the false claim that a Washington, D.C., police officer who responded to the Capitol breach was really part of the rioting crowd. The side-by-side photos show two different people who bear some resemblance to each other. Another claim that circulated on social media falsely said a video clip proves that “Capitol Police gave protesters OK” to enter the building. And other posts made the unfounded claim that Pelosi “won’t let Capitol Police testify about what happened Jan. 6.” In fact, on July 27, four members of the Capitol Police testified at the first hearing of the Jan. 6 House select committee. For more, see “ Memes Misidentify D.C. Police Officer as Jan. 6 Protester ,” “ Video Doesn’t Prove Capitol Police Allowed Jan. 6 Protesters to Enter Capitol ” and “ Capitol Police Expected to Testify During House Committee’s Probe of Jan. 6 Riot .” Impeachment Vote Sparks Misleading Democratic Ads. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee used Republican lawmakers’ votes against impeaching Trump to claim eight lawmakers “stood with Q, not you,” a reference to QAnon, whose acolytes baselessly think a group of elite pedophiles runs the government and the entertainment industry. N one of the targeted Republicans is known to be an actual supporter of QAnon, and three of them supported a resolution to censure Trump for the role he played in the attack on the Capitol. For more, see “ Misleading DCCC Ads Link Republicans to QAnon .” Bipartisan Report Didn’t ‘Single Out’ Trump . In the summer, a bipartisan group of four senators released a report on the security and intelligence failures related to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. All four — Democratic Sens. Amy Klobuchar and Gary Peters, and Republican Sens. Roy Blunt and Rob Portman — have previously said that Trump was at least partly responsible for the attack, but their report did not “single out” Trump “for inciting … the riots,” as a Facebook post from a liberal advocacy group suggested. The report did not examine Trump’s role in, or fault him for, the attack. It was “limited in scope” and did not address “what motivated people,” Peters said. For more, see “ Facebook Post Misleads on Bipartisan Capitol Attack Report and Interview .” Some Protesters Were ‘Armed.’ Social media posts also misleadingly claimed the attack on the Capitol was not an “armed” insurrection, citing FBI testimony that no guns were seized from suspects that day. But 23 people were charged with having deadly or dangerous weapons during the assault — including a loaded handgun found on a man arrested on Capitol grounds. Other weapons included baseball bats, chemical sprays, a captured police officer’s riot shield, a crowbar, fire extinguishers and a metal flagpole. In legal terms , “armed” means being in possession of any weapon, not just a gun. For more, see “ Capitol Protesters Were Armed With Variety of Weapons .” Capitol Police’s Tampa Office. In July, the U.S. Capitol Police announced it would add field offices in Tampa and San Francisco to investigate threats against members of Congress, part of changes the agency was making in the wake of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz criticized the move, saying he was “i ncreasingly concerned that our federal government and many elements within it are using these exquisite national security authorities to turn against our own people.” An online Change.org petition , now with nearly 3,000 signatures, demanded the removal of the field office in Tampa, claiming it was created “in order to further investigate the events at the Capitol on January 6, 2021.” But a Capitol Police spokesperson told us that while many plans announced in the July press release were related to reviews of the events of Jan. 6, the plan for field offices long predated the Capitol riot. “The false narrative that this was created after the 6 th to go after people who breached the Capitol, that is not accurate,” the spokesperson told us in a phone interview. For more, see “ The Facts on Capitol Police’s Tampa Office .” All of our articles related to the Jan. 6 attack can be found here . E ditor’s note: FactCheck.org does not accept advertising. We rely on grants and individual donations from people like you. Please consider a donation. Credit card donations may be made through our “Donate” page . If you prefer to give by check, send to: FactCheck.org, Annenberg Public Policy Center, 202 S. 36th St., Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Markdown	[Skip to main content](https://www.factcheck.org/2022/01/factchecking-claims-about-the-jan-6-capitol-riot/#main) [FactCheck.org®](https://www.factcheck.org/) A Project of The Annenberg Public Policy Center [![Become a Facebook fan](https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/fc-icon-facebook-mini.png)](https://www.facebook.com/factcheck.org) [![Follow us on Twitter](https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/x-icon-logo-black.png)](https://www.x.com/factcheckdotorg) [![Get the RSS feed](https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/fc-icon-rss.png)](https://www.factcheck.org/feed/) [![Follow on Insta](https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/fc-icon-instagram-1.png)](https://www.instagram.com/factcheckorg/) [![Sign up for the email newsletter](https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/fc-icon-email.png)](https://www.factcheck.org/subscribe/) [![Help us hold politicians accountable. ](https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/fc-icon-donate.png)](https://giving.aws.cloud.upenn.edu/?fastStart=simpleForm&program=ANS&fund=602014) [FactCheck.org®](https://www.factcheck.org/) - [Home](https://www.factcheck.org/ "Home") - [Articles](https://www.factcheck.org/2022/01/factchecking-claims-about-the-jan-6-capitol-riot/ "Articles") - [FactCheck Posts](https://www.factcheck.org/the-factcheck-wire/ "FactCheck Posts") - [SciCheck](https://www.factcheck.org/scicheck/ "SciCheck") - [En Español](https://www.factcheck.org/es/en-espanol/ "En Español") - [Project 2025 series](https://www.factcheck.org/issue/project-2025-series/ "Project 2025 series") - [Debunking Viral Claims](https://www.factcheck.org/fake-news/ "Debunking Viral Claims") - [Ask a Question](https://www.factcheck.org/2022/01/factchecking-claims-about-the-jan-6-capitol-riot/ "Ask a Question") - [Ask FactCheck](https://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/ "Ask FactCheck") - [Ask SciCheck](https://www.factcheck.org/askscicheck/ "Ask SciCheck") - [Donate](https://giving.aws.cloud.upenn.edu/fund?fastStart=simpleForm&program=ANS&fund=602014 "Donate") - [Topics](https://www.factcheck.org/2022/01/factchecking-claims-about-the-jan-6-capitol-riot/ "Topics") - [President Trump](https://www.factcheck.org/person/donald-trump/ "President Trump") - [Robert F. Kennedy Jr.](https://www.factcheck.org/person/robert-f-kennedy-jr/ "Robert F. Kennedy Jr.") - [immigration](https://www.factcheck.org/issue/immigration/ "immigration") - [climate change](https://www.factcheck.org/issue/climate-change/ "climate change") - [coronavirus](https://www.factcheck.org/issue/coronavirus/ "coronavirus") - [tariffs](https://www.factcheck.org/issue/tariffs/ "tariffs") - [View All](https://www.factcheck.org/archives/ "View All") - [About Us](https://www.factcheck.org/2022/01/factchecking-claims-about-the-jan-6-capitol-riot/ "About Us") - [Our Mission](https://www.factcheck.org/about/our-mission/ "Our Mission") - [Our Process](https://www.factcheck.org/our-process/ "Our Process") - [Our Funding](https://www.factcheck.org/our-funding/ "Our Funding") - [Our Staff](https://www.factcheck.org/our-staff/ "Our Staff") - [Undergraduate Fellows](https://www.factcheck.org/undergraduate-fellows/ "Undergraduate Fellows") - [Awards](https://www.factcheck.org/awards/ "Awards") - [Request a Correction](https://www.factcheck.org/request-a-correction/ "Request a Correction") - [Contact Us](https://www.factcheck.org/about/contact-us/ "Contact Us") - [Search](https://www.factcheck.org/search/ "Search") - [More](https://www.factcheck.org/2022/01/factchecking-claims-about-the-jan-6-capitol-riot/ "More") - [Viral Claims](https://www.factcheck.org/hot-topics/ "Viral Claims") - [Newsletter](https://www.factcheck.org/subscribe/ "Newsletter") - [Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/factcheckorg/ "Instagram") - [Threads](https://www.threads.net/@factcheckorg "Threads") - [YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/factcheckdotorg "YouTube") - [TikTok](https://www.tiktok.com/@factcheckorg "TikTok") - [Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/factcheck.org "Facebook") - [X](https://twitter.com/factcheckdotorg "X") - [FactCheck On the Air](https://www.factcheck.org/on-the-air/ "FactCheck On the Air") [FactCheck Posts](https://www.factcheck.org/the-factcheck-wire/) › [Featured Posts](https://www.factcheck.org/featured-posts/) # FactChecking Claims About the Jan. 6 Capitol Riot By [Lori Robertson](https://www.factcheck.org/author/lori-robertson/ "Posts by Lori Robertson") Posted on January 6, 2022 * The Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol was the culmination of months of false claims about election fraud, including a litany recited by then-President Donald Trump in a speech shortly before a mob stormed the building, temporarily halting the counting of electoral votes in a joint session of Congress. On that day — and afterward — we debunked false, misleading and unfounded claims related to the events that day. Here is a summary of our coverage. [![](https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Getty-capitol-riot-story.jpg)](https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Getty-capitol-riot-story.jpg) Trump supporters clash with police and security forces at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Photo by Brent Stirton/Getty Images. Trump’s Speech. In a rally near the White House, one year ago, Trump served his supporters a laundry list of bogus claims about election fraud in swing states. Then-President-elect Joe Biden had won the states of Pennsylvania, Georgia and Arizona, but Trump, as he had for weeks, made false statements about illegal votes being counted. We wrote about a dozen claims, including Trump’s falsehood that “66,000 votes in Georgia were cast by individuals under the legal voting age.” The Republican official who oversees Georgia’s voting system said, “The actual number is zero.” Trump also claimed that somehow then-Vice President Mike Pence could initiate a process to overturn the election results and declare Trump the winner. While Trump was speaking, Pence [released](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ErESrZQXcAIshEA.jpg) [a letter to Congress](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ErESrZNWMAAS0f9.jpg) saying he doesn’t have the right to do that. “It is my considered judgment that my oath to support and defend the Constitution constrains me from claiming unilateral authority to determine which electoral votes should be counted and which should not,” Pence, who served as president of the Senate that day, said. Many hours after Trump’s speech, at about 3:40 a.m. on Jan. 7, the electoral vote count ended, with [Pence announcing](https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/electoral-college-vote-count-biden-victory/) that Biden would become the 46th president. For more, see “[Trump’s Falsehood-Filled ‘Save America’ Rally](https://www.factcheck.org/2021/01/trumps-falsehood-filled-save-america-rally/).” The Lead-up to Jan. 6. Five days after the riot, House Democrats introduced [legislation](https://degette.house.gov/sites/degette.house.gov/files/ARTICLES%20-%20Final%20.pdf) to impeach Trump, charging him with “inciting violence against the Government of the United States.” The resolution, approved by the House in a [232-197 vote](https://clerk.house.gov/evs/2021/roll017.xml) with the support of 10 Republicans, accused Trump of repeatedly issuing “false statements asserting that the Presidential election results were the product of widespread fraud and should not be accepted by the American people or certified by State or Federal officials.” We had been writing about such claims for months, and we compiled a sampling of Trump’s comments and actions leading up to the impeachment vote, starting with his [April 7, 2020, comments](https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-vice-president-pence-members-coronavirus-task-force-press-briefing-april-7-2020/) that “mail ballots” were “very dangerous” and “fraudulent in many cases.” For more, see “[Road to a Second Impeachment](https://www.factcheck.org/2021/01/road-to-a-second-impeachment/).” National Guard Deployment. National Guard members didn’t arrive at the Capitol on Jan. 6 until about 5:40 p.m., when most of the violence had already subsided. In a [recorded video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHvlC8RRNNk&feature=emb_logo) the following day, Trump claimed that he “immediately deployed the National Guard and federal law enforcement to secure the building and expel the intruders.” But that was contradicted by news reports citing unnamed sources who say Trump resisted efforts to bring in the Guard at the outset of the riot. In a Jan. 13 article, we chronicled what was known at the time about the Guard’s deployment. For more, see “[Timeline of National Guard Deployment to Capitol](https://www.factcheck.org/2021/01/timeline-of-national-guard-deployment-to-capitol/).” Blaming Pelosi. Over the summer, House Republicans tried to shift blame for the breach of the Capitol to Speaker Nancy Pelosi, saying she was “ultimately responsible for the breakdown of security.” But we found their arguments overstated the role of the House speaker in overseeing security of the Capitol and relied on speculation. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy suggested, without evidence, that prior to Jan. 6, 2021, Pelosi played a role in denying a request to use National Guard members at the Capitol that day. (Trump also pushed this idea in a [Jan. 4 statement](https://www.donaldjtrump.com/news/news-srmyqt7ufn0) this year.) Rep. Rodney Davis pointed to the fact that on the afternoon of Jan. 6, the House sergeant at arms sought Pelosi’s permission to bring in the National Guard as evidence that Pelosi was “calling the shots on all of their actions.” A Pelosi aide confirmed the request was made but said the speaker “expects security professionals to make security decisions” and that she only expects “to be briefed about those decisions.” The request also went to then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, and while both Pelosi and McConnell OK’d bringing in the Guard, the Department of Defense still needed to approve the move. For more, see “[Republicans’ Shaky, No Evidence Attempt to Cast Blame on Pelosi for Jan. 6](https://www.factcheck.org/2021/07/republicans-shaky-no-evidence-attempt-to-cast-blame-on-pelosi-for-jan-6/).” How Many Died? In October, Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez [tweeted](https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1452459627187216388) that the Capitol riot resulted in “almost 10 dead.” There is reasoned debate about the number who died as a result of the riot. Ocasio-Cortez includes four law enforcement officials who responded to the Capitol that day and committed suicide in the days and months afterward and two rally participants who died of heart failure. Another rallygoer was initially believed to have been trampled to death but was later determined to have died of an accidental overdose. We explained what is publicly known about the deaths of the nine people included in the congresswoman’s tally. For more, see “[How Many Died as a Result of Capitol Riot?](https://www.factcheck.org/2021/11/how-many-died-as-a-result-of-capitol-riot/)” Unfounded Theory on FBI Informants. Another no-evidence claim is the idea that “unindicted co-conspirators” mentioned in federal indictments related to the Capitol riot are undercover FBI agents or informants, as conservative outlets have claimed or suggested. Legal experts and federal case law say that government agents and informants cannot be labeled conspirators to a crime. During his June 15 Fox News show, for example, host Tucker Carlson, referencing a story from a conservative website, first [said](https://archive.org/details/FOXNEWSW_20210616_050000_Tucker_Carlson_Tonight/start/360/end/420) “potentially” and “almost certainly” FBI agents were involved, and then definitively declared that “FBI operatives were organizing the attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6.” Republicans in Congress have pushed the unfounded theory as well, including Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene and Matt Gaetz. [Federal case law](https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-rodriguez-42) from the 1985 case United States v. Rodriguez acknowledged that “government agents and informers cannot be conspirators.” For more, see “[Conservative Outlets Advance Unfounded Theory About Capitol Attack](https://www.factcheck.org/2021/06/conservative-outlets-advance-unfounded-theory-about-capitol-attack/).” False Claims About Police. One social media meme spread the false claim that a Washington, D.C., police officer who responded to the Capitol breach was really part of the rioting crowd. The side-by-side photos show two different people who bear some resemblance to each other. Another claim that circulated on social media falsely said a video clip proves that “Capitol Police gave protesters OK” to enter the building. And other posts made the unfounded claim that Pelosi “won’t let Capitol Police testify about what happened Jan. 6.” In fact, on July 27, four members of the Capitol Police [testified](https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/january-6-house-select-committee-hearing-investigation-day-1-full-transcript) at the first hearing of the Jan. 6 House select committee. For more, see “[Memes Misidentify D.C. Police Officer as Jan. 6 Protester](https://www.factcheck.org/2021/08/memes-misidentify-d-c-police-officer-as-jan-6-protester/),” “[Video Doesn’t Prove Capitol Police Allowed Jan. 6 Protesters to Enter Capitol](https://www.factcheck.org/2021/05/video-doesnt-prove-capitol-police-allowed-jan-6-protesters-to-enter-capitol/)” and “[Capitol Police Expected to Testify During House Committee’s Probe of Jan. 6 Riot](https://www.factcheck.org/2021/07/capitol-police-expected-to-testify-during-house-committees-probe-of-jan-6-riot/).” Impeachment Vote Sparks Misleading Democratic Ads. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee used Republican lawmakers’ votes against impeaching Trump to claim eight lawmakers “stood with Q, not you,” a reference to QAnon, whose acolytes baselessly think a group of elite pedophiles runs the government and the entertainment industry. None of the targeted Republicans is known to be an actual supporter of QAnon, and three of them [supported](https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/5/cosponsors?r=9&s=2&searchResultViewType=expanded) a resolution to censure Trump for the role he played in the attack on the Capitol. For more, see “[Misleading DCCC Ads Link Republicans to QAnon](https://www.factcheck.org/2021/02/misleading-dccc-ads-link-republicans-to-qanon/).” Bipartisan Report Didn’t ‘Single Out’ Trump. In the summer, a bipartisan group of four senators released a report on the security and intelligence failures related to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. All four — Democratic Sens. Amy Klobuchar and Gary Peters, and Republican Sens. Roy Blunt and Rob Portman — have previously said that Trump was at least partly responsible for the attack, but their report did not “single out” Trump “for inciting … the riots,” as a Facebook post from a liberal advocacy group suggested. The report did not examine Trump’s role in, or fault him for, the attack. It was “limited in scope” and did not address “what motivated people,” Peters said. For more, see “[Facebook Post Misleads on Bipartisan Capitol Attack Report and Interview](https://www.factcheck.org/2021/06/facebook-post-misleads-on-bipartisan-capital-attack-report-and-interview/).” Some Protesters Were ‘Armed.’ Social media posts also misleadingly claimed the attack on the Capitol was not an “armed” insurrection, citing FBI testimony that no guns were seized from suspects that day. But 23 people were charged with having deadly or dangerous weapons during the assault — including a loaded handgun found on a man arrested on Capitol grounds. Other weapons included baseball bats, chemical sprays, a captured police officer’s riot shield, a crowbar, fire extinguishers and a metal flagpole. In legal terms, “armed” means being in possession of any weapon, not just a gun. For more, see “[Capitol Protesters Were Armed With Variety of Weapons](https://www.factcheck.org/2021/03/capitol-protesters-were-armed-with-variety-of-weapons/).” Capitol Police’s Tampa Office.** In July, the U.S. Capitol Police [announced](https://www.uscp.gov/media-center/press-releases/after-attack-future-us-capitol-police) it would add field offices in Tampa and San Francisco to investigate threats against members of Congress, part of changes the agency was making in the wake of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz criticized the move, saying he was “increasingly concerned that our federal government and many elements within it are using these exquisite national security authorities to turn against our own people.” An online [Change.org petition](https://www.change.org/p/ron-desantis-demand-the-immediate-removal-of-the-united-states-capitol-police-field-office-in-tampa?redirect=false), now with nearly 3,000 signatures, demanded the removal of the field office in Tampa, claiming it was created “in order to further investigate the events at the Capitol on January 6, 2021.” But a Capitol Police spokesperson told us that while many plans announced in the July press release were related to reviews of the events of Jan. 6, the plan for field offices long predated the Capitol riot. “The false narrative that this was created after the 6th to go after people who breached the Capitol, that is not accurate,” the spokesperson told us in a phone interview. For more, see “[The Facts on Capitol Police’s Tampa Office](https://www.factcheck.org/2021/08/the-facts-on-capitol-polices-tampa-office/).” All of our articles related to the Jan. 6 attack can be found [here](https://www.factcheck.org/issue/capitol-riot/). Editor’s note: FactCheck.org does not accept advertising. We rely on grants and individual donations from people like you. Please consider a donation. Credit card donations may be made through [our “Donate” page](https://giving.aws.cloud.upenn.edu/?fastStart=simpleForm&program=ANS&fund=602014). If you prefer to give by check, send to: FactCheck.org, Annenberg Public Policy Center, 202 S. 36th St., Philadelphia, PA 19104. - Categories - [FactCheck Posts](https://www.factcheck.org/the-factcheck-wire/) - [Featured Posts](https://www.factcheck.org/featured-posts/) - Issue - [capitol riot](https://www.factcheck.org/issue/capitol-riot/) - People - [Donald Trump](https://www.factcheck.org/person/donald-trump/) * [Previous StoryOur Most Popular Articles in 2021](https://www.factcheck.org/2021/12/our-most-popular-articles-in-2021/) [Next StoryDeath of Betty White Leads to Swirl of Falsehoods on Social Media](https://www.factcheck.org/2022/01/scicheck-death-of-betty-white-leads-to-swirl-of-falsehoods-on-social-media/) * Ask FactCheck Q: How real is birth tourism? A: The government doesn’t provide estimates of the extent of so-called birth tourism — pregnant women coming to the U.S. on tourism visas in order to obtain birthright U.S. citizenship for their newborn child. One outside group has estimated it may be more than 20,000 births per year. Some argue it’s not common enough to justify upending longstanding birthright citizenship policies. [Read the full question and answer](https://www.factcheck.org/2026/04/what-do-we-know-about-birth-tourism/) [View the Ask FactCheck archives](https://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/) Have a question? [Ask us.](https://www.factcheck.org/ask-factcheck/ask-us-a-question/) [Donate Now Because facts matter.](https://giving.aws.cloud.upenn.edu/?fastStart=simpleForm&program=ANS&fund=602014 "Because facts matter.") [![SciCheck's COVID-19/Vaccination Project](https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/misconceptions2.png) SciCheck's COVID-19/Vaccination Project Preempting and exposing vaccination and COVID-19 misinformation.](https://www.factcheck.org/covid-misconceptions/) [![Proyecto de Vacunación/COVID-19](https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/misconceptions2.png) Proyecto de Vacunación/COVID-19 Precaviendo y exponiendo la desinformación sobre el COVID-19 y sus vacunas](https://www.factcheck.org/es/covid-misconceptions/) [![SciCheck](https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/fc-icon-scicheck.png) SciCheck Fact-checking science-based claims.](https://www.factcheck.org/scicheck/) [![Viral Spiral](https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/fc-icon-viralspiral.png) Viral Spiral Don’t get spun by internet rumors.](https://www.factcheck.org/hot-topics/) [![Newsletter](https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/fc-icon-signup.png) Newsletter Get our free weekly email.](https://www.factcheck.org/subscribe) [![Mailbag](https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/fc-icon-mailbag.png) Mailbag Letters from our readers.](https://www.factcheck.org/factcheck-mailbag/) [![On the Air](https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/fc-icon-ota.png) On the Air Our staff on TV and radio.](https://www.factcheck.org/on-the-air) [![NewsFeed Defenders](https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/factchecksidebar_icon-1.png) NewsFeed Defenders A media literacy game to detect misinformation.](https://www.factcheck.org/newsfeed-defenders/) - [Archives](https://www.factcheck.org/archives/) - [Privacy](https://www.factcheck.org/privacy/) - [Copyright Policy](https://www.factcheck.org/copyright-policy/) - [Contact Us](https://www.factcheck.org/about/contact-us/) - [Report Accessibility Issues and Get Help](https://accessibility.web-resources.upenn.edu/get-help) © Copyright 2026 FactCheck.org ® A Project of The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania
Readable Markdown	The Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol was the culmination of months of false claims about election fraud, including a litany recited by then-President Donald Trump in a speech shortly before a mob stormed the building, temporarily halting the counting of electoral votes in a joint session of Congress. On that day — and afterward — we debunked false, misleading and unfounded claims related to the events that day. Here is a summary of our coverage. [![](https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Getty-capitol-riot-story.jpg)](https://cdn.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/Getty-capitol-riot-story.jpg) Trump supporters clash with police and security forces at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Photo by Brent Stirton/Getty Images. Trump’s Speech. In a rally near the White House, one year ago, Trump served his supporters a laundry list of bogus claims about election fraud in swing states. Then-President-elect Joe Biden had won the states of Pennsylvania, Georgia and Arizona, but Trump, as he had for weeks, made false statements about illegal votes being counted. We wrote about a dozen claims, including Trump’s falsehood that “66,000 votes in Georgia were cast by individuals under the legal voting age.” The Republican official who oversees Georgia’s voting system said, “The actual number is zero.” Trump also claimed that somehow then-Vice President Mike Pence could initiate a process to overturn the election results and declare Trump the winner. While Trump was speaking, Pence [released](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ErESrZQXcAIshEA.jpg) [a letter to Congress](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ErESrZNWMAAS0f9.jpg) saying he doesn’t have the right to do that. “It is my considered judgment that my oath to support and defend the Constitution constrains me from claiming unilateral authority to determine which electoral votes should be counted and which should not,” Pence, who served as president of the Senate that day, said. Many hours after Trump’s speech, at about 3:40 a.m. on Jan. 7, the electoral vote count ended, with [Pence announcing](https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/electoral-college-vote-count-biden-victory/) that Biden would become the 46th president. For more, see “[Trump’s Falsehood-Filled ‘Save America’ Rally](https://www.factcheck.org/2021/01/trumps-falsehood-filled-save-america-rally/).” The Lead-up to Jan. 6. Five days after the riot, House Democrats introduced [legislation](https://degette.house.gov/sites/degette.house.gov/files/ARTICLES%20-%20Final%20.pdf) to impeach Trump, charging him with “inciting violence against the Government of the United States.” The resolution, approved by the House in a [232-197 vote](https://clerk.house.gov/evs/2021/roll017.xml) with the support of 10 Republicans, accused Trump of repeatedly issuing “false statements asserting that the Presidential election results were the product of widespread fraud and should not be accepted by the American people or certified by State or Federal officials.” We had been writing about such claims for months, and we compiled a sampling of Trump’s comments and actions leading up to the impeachment vote, starting with his [April 7, 2020, comments](https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-vice-president-pence-members-coronavirus-task-force-press-briefing-april-7-2020/) that “mail ballots” were “very dangerous” and “fraudulent in many cases.” For more, see “[Road to a Second Impeachment](https://www.factcheck.org/2021/01/road-to-a-second-impeachment/).” National Guard Deployment. National Guard members didn’t arrive at the Capitol on Jan. 6 until about 5:40 p.m., when most of the violence had already subsided. In a [recorded video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHvlC8RRNNk&feature=emb_logo) the following day, Trump claimed that he “immediately deployed the National Guard and federal law enforcement to secure the building and expel the intruders.” But that was contradicted by news reports citing unnamed sources who say Trump resisted efforts to bring in the Guard at the outset of the riot. In a Jan. 13 article, we chronicled what was known at the time about the Guard’s deployment. For more, see “[Timeline of National Guard Deployment to Capitol](https://www.factcheck.org/2021/01/timeline-of-national-guard-deployment-to-capitol/).” Blaming Pelosi. Over the summer, House Republicans tried to shift blame for the breach of the Capitol to Speaker Nancy Pelosi, saying she was “ultimately responsible for the breakdown of security.” But we found their arguments overstated the role of the House speaker in overseeing security of the Capitol and relied on speculation. House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy suggested, without evidence, that prior to Jan. 6, 2021, Pelosi played a role in denying a request to use National Guard members at the Capitol that day. (Trump also pushed this idea in a [Jan. 4 statement](https://www.donaldjtrump.com/news/news-srmyqt7ufn0) this year.) Rep. Rodney Davis pointed to the fact that on the afternoon of Jan. 6, the House sergeant at arms sought Pelosi’s permission to bring in the National Guard as evidence that Pelosi was “calling the shots on all of their actions.” A Pelosi aide confirmed the request was made but said the speaker “expects security professionals to make security decisions” and that she only expects “to be briefed about those decisions.” The request also went to then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, and while both Pelosi and McConnell OK’d bringing in the Guard, the Department of Defense still needed to approve the move. For more, see “[Republicans’ Shaky, No Evidence Attempt to Cast Blame on Pelosi for Jan. 6](https://www.factcheck.org/2021/07/republicans-shaky-no-evidence-attempt-to-cast-blame-on-pelosi-for-jan-6/).” How Many Died? In October, Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez [tweeted](https://twitter.com/AOC/status/1452459627187216388) that the Capitol riot resulted in “almost 10 dead.” There is reasoned debate about the number who died as a result of the riot. Ocasio-Cortez includes four law enforcement officials who responded to the Capitol that day and committed suicide in the days and months afterward and two rally participants who died of heart failure. Another rallygoer was initially believed to have been trampled to death but was later determined to have died of an accidental overdose. We explained what is publicly known about the deaths of the nine people included in the congresswoman’s tally. For more, see “[How Many Died as a Result of Capitol Riot?](https://www.factcheck.org/2021/11/how-many-died-as-a-result-of-capitol-riot/)” Unfounded Theory on FBI Informants. Another no-evidence claim is the idea that “unindicted co-conspirators” mentioned in federal indictments related to the Capitol riot are undercover FBI agents or informants, as conservative outlets have claimed or suggested. Legal experts and federal case law say that government agents and informants cannot be labeled conspirators to a crime. During his June 15 Fox News show, for example, host Tucker Carlson, referencing a story from a conservative website, first [said](https://archive.org/details/FOXNEWSW_20210616_050000_Tucker_Carlson_Tonight/start/360/end/420) “potentially” and “almost certainly” FBI agents were involved, and then definitively declared that “FBI operatives were organizing the attack on the Capitol on Jan. 6.” Republicans in Congress have pushed the unfounded theory as well, including Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene and Matt Gaetz. [Federal case law](https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-rodriguez-42) from the 1985 case United States v. Rodriguez acknowledged that “government agents and informers cannot be conspirators.” For more, see “[Conservative Outlets Advance Unfounded Theory About Capitol Attack](https://www.factcheck.org/2021/06/conservative-outlets-advance-unfounded-theory-about-capitol-attack/).” False Claims About Police. One social media meme spread the false claim that a Washington, D.C., police officer who responded to the Capitol breach was really part of the rioting crowd. The side-by-side photos show two different people who bear some resemblance to each other. Another claim that circulated on social media falsely said a video clip proves that “Capitol Police gave protesters OK” to enter the building. And other posts made the unfounded claim that Pelosi “won’t let Capitol Police testify about what happened Jan. 6.” In fact, on July 27, four members of the Capitol Police [testified](https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/january-6-house-select-committee-hearing-investigation-day-1-full-transcript) at the first hearing of the Jan. 6 House select committee. For more, see “[Memes Misidentify D.C. Police Officer as Jan. 6 Protester](https://www.factcheck.org/2021/08/memes-misidentify-d-c-police-officer-as-jan-6-protester/),” “[Video Doesn’t Prove Capitol Police Allowed Jan. 6 Protesters to Enter Capitol](https://www.factcheck.org/2021/05/video-doesnt-prove-capitol-police-allowed-jan-6-protesters-to-enter-capitol/)” and “[Capitol Police Expected to Testify During House Committee’s Probe of Jan. 6 Riot](https://www.factcheck.org/2021/07/capitol-police-expected-to-testify-during-house-committees-probe-of-jan-6-riot/).” Impeachment Vote Sparks Misleading Democratic Ads. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee used Republican lawmakers’ votes against impeaching Trump to claim eight lawmakers “stood with Q, not you,” a reference to QAnon, whose acolytes baselessly think a group of elite pedophiles runs the government and the entertainment industry. None of the targeted Republicans is known to be an actual supporter of QAnon, and three of them [supported](https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/5/cosponsors?r=9&s=2&searchResultViewType=expanded) a resolution to censure Trump for the role he played in the attack on the Capitol. For more, see “[Misleading DCCC Ads Link Republicans to QAnon](https://www.factcheck.org/2021/02/misleading-dccc-ads-link-republicans-to-qanon/).” Bipartisan Report Didn’t ‘Single Out’ Trump. In the summer, a bipartisan group of four senators released a report on the security and intelligence failures related to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. All four — Democratic Sens. Amy Klobuchar and Gary Peters, and Republican Sens. Roy Blunt and Rob Portman — have previously said that Trump was at least partly responsible for the attack, but their report did not “single out” Trump “for inciting … the riots,” as a Facebook post from a liberal advocacy group suggested. The report did not examine Trump’s role in, or fault him for, the attack. It was “limited in scope” and did not address “what motivated people,” Peters said. For more, see “[Facebook Post Misleads on Bipartisan Capitol Attack Report and Interview](https://www.factcheck.org/2021/06/facebook-post-misleads-on-bipartisan-capital-attack-report-and-interview/).” Some Protesters Were ‘Armed.’ Social media posts also misleadingly claimed the attack on the Capitol was not an “armed” insurrection, citing FBI testimony that no guns were seized from suspects that day. But 23 people were charged with having deadly or dangerous weapons during the assault — including a loaded handgun found on a man arrested on Capitol grounds. Other weapons included baseball bats, chemical sprays, a captured police officer’s riot shield, a crowbar, fire extinguishers and a metal flagpole. In legal terms, “armed” means being in possession of any weapon, not just a gun. For more, see “[Capitol Protesters Were Armed With Variety of Weapons](https://www.factcheck.org/2021/03/capitol-protesters-were-armed-with-variety-of-weapons/).” Capitol Police’s Tampa Office. In July, the U.S. Capitol Police [announced](https://www.uscp.gov/media-center/press-releases/after-attack-future-us-capitol-police) it would add field offices in Tampa and San Francisco to investigate threats against members of Congress, part of changes the agency was making in the wake of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz criticized the move, saying he was “increasingly concerned that our federal government and many elements within it are using these exquisite national security authorities to turn against our own people.” An online [Change.org petition](https://www.change.org/p/ron-desantis-demand-the-immediate-removal-of-the-united-states-capitol-police-field-office-in-tampa?redirect=false), now with nearly 3,000 signatures, demanded the removal of the field office in Tampa, claiming it was created “in order to further investigate the events at the Capitol on January 6, 2021.” But a Capitol Police spokesperson told us that while many plans announced in the July press release were related to reviews of the events of Jan. 6, the plan for field offices long predated the Capitol riot. “The false narrative that this was created after the 6th to go after people who breached the Capitol, that is not accurate,” the spokesperson told us in a phone interview. For more, see “[The Facts on Capitol Police’s Tampa Office](https://www.factcheck.org/2021/08/the-facts-on-capitol-polices-tampa-office/).” All of our articles related to the Jan. 6 attack can be found [here](https://www.factcheck.org/issue/capitol-riot/). Editor’s note: FactCheck.org does not accept advertising. We rely on grants and individual donations from people like you. Please consider a donation. Credit card donations may be made through [our “Donate” page](https://giving.aws.cloud.upenn.edu/?fastStart=simpleForm&program=ANS&fund=602014). If you prefer to give by check, send to: FactCheck.org, Annenberg Public Policy Center, 202 S. 36th St., Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Shard	95 (laksa)
Root Hash	9637418184873233095
Unparsed URL	org,factcheck!www,/2022/01/factchecking-claims-about-the-jan-6-capitol-riot/ s443