🕷️ Crawler Inspector

URL Lookup

Direct Parameter Lookup

Raw Queries and Responses

1. Shard Calculation

Query:

Response:

Calculated Shard: 62 (from laksa010)

2. Crawled Status Check

Query:

curl -X POST \
  'http://laksa062.int.ahrefs:8124/' \
  -H 'Content-Type: text/plain' \
  -H 'X-ClickHouse-Database: crawler3' \
  -H 'Authorization: Basic YXBpOg==' \
  -d 'SELECT getAhrefsURLFromUnparsed(src_unparsed) AS found_url, ifNull(toUnixTimestamp(download_stamp), 0) AS crawl_time, ifNull(toUnixTimestamp(props_url_first_seen), 0) AS first_indexed_time, download_http_code AS http_code, src_unparsed AS src_unparsed, src_root_hash AS src_root_hash, history_drop_reason AS history_drop_reason, meta_title AS meta_title, meta_descriptions AS meta_descriptions, attrs_boilerpipe_text AS attrs_boilerpipe_text, attrs_markdown AS attrs_markdown, attrs_readable_markdown AS attrs_readable_markdown, meta_canonical AS meta_canonical FROM crawler3.page_info_local FINAL PREWHERE (src_root_hash, src_unparsed) IN ((getAhrefsRootHashFromUnparsed(getAhrefsUnparsedNoserviceFromURL(\'https://www.britannica.com/event/Watergate-Scandal/Watergate-trial-and-aftermath\')), getAhrefsUnparsedNoserviceFromURL(\'https://www.britannica.com/event/Watergate-Scandal/Watergate-trial-and-aftermath\'))) FORMAT JSONEachRow'

Response:

{"found_url":"https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/event\/Watergate-Scandal\/Watergate-trial-and-aftermath","crawl_time":1776269842,"first_indexed_time":1563529694,"http_code":200,"src_unparsed":"com,britannica!www,\/event\/Watergate-Scandal\/Watergate-trial-and-aftermath s443","src_root_hash":"5455945239613777662","history_drop_reason":null,"meta_title":"Watergate scandal - Political Corruption, Nixon Resignation, Cover-up | Britannica","meta_descriptions":["Watergate scandal - Political Corruption, Nixon Resignation, Cover-up: The trial of the five arrested burglars and two accomplices began in federal court less than two weeks before Nixon’s second-term inauguration. The relatively narrow indictment on charges of burglary, conspiracy, and violation of federal wiretapping laws itself spoke to the success of the White House in containing the scandal. The presiding judge, John J. Sirica, however, kept badgering defendants and witnesses on matters not covered in the indictment—namely, the financial and institutional involvement of the White House and reelection campaign. All the defendants pleaded guilty except Liddy and McCord, who were convicted at the end of January. The court"],"attrs_boilerpipe_text":"The trial of the five arrested burglars and two accomplices began in federal court less than two weeks before Nixon’s second-term inauguration. The relatively narrow indictment on charges of\nburglary\n,\nconspiracy\n, and violation of federal wiretapping laws itself spoke to the success of the\nWhite House\nin containing the scandal. The presiding judge,\nJohn J. Sirica\n, however, kept badgering defendants and witnesses on matters not covered in the indictment—namely, the financial and institutional involvement of the White House and reelection campaign.\nNews\n•\nAll the defendants pleaded guilty except Liddy and McCord, who were convicted at the end of January. The court was scheduled to reconvene on March 23 to hear sentences. In the\ninterim\nthe Senate voted 77–0 to establish a special investigating committee on abuses in the 1972 presidential campaign (the Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities) to be presided over by the universally respected\nconservative\nNorth Carolina\nDemocrat\nSamuel J. Ervin, Jr.\nA strict constitutionalist, Ervin had been speaking out angrily on Nixon’s extraordinary extensions of presidential power, including the unprecedented presidential “impoundment” of funds authorized for expenditure by Congress and his continuation of the bombing of Cambodia even after a cease-fire had been agreed to in the\nVietnam War\n.\nJohn Dean\nThe former White House counsel testified in June 1973 before the Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities regardin the Watergate scandal.\nAt the beginning of March, during Senate confirmation hearings of Nixon’s nominee to head the\nFBI\n, L. Patrick Gray, it was\nalleged\nthat a little-known White House legal aide named\nJohn Wesley Dean III\nhad been given personal access to the FBI’s Watergate investigation. This revelation was followed almost immediately by the president’s unprecedentedly sweeping refusal, under the claim of “\nexecutive privilege\n,” to allow aides such as Dean to testify before Congress. Ervin responded that if the president pressed the issue, he would issue arrest warrants to compel Nixon aides to testify.\nMeanwhile, Sirica controversially sought to leverage the hearings and continued\ngrand jury\nproceedings to induce the defendants to speak more forthrightly about a broader conspiracy. He succeeded when defendant McCord passed him an extraordinary presentencing letter, in which he explained that the defendants had been pressured to plead guilty and perjure themselves about the involvement of higher-ups. On March 23 Sirica read the letter in open court. He then took the\ncontentious\nstep of passing exceptionally long “provisional” sentences on the defendants. However, Sirica made clear that were the defendants to speak frankly to the reconvened Watergate grand jury or the Senate hearings, he would reduce their sentences.\nAlmost single-handedly, with great courage and risk to his reputation, Sirica had broken the case wide open.\nRevelations\nbegan cascading through the press: that Gray may have been involved in the cover-up; that the transnational conglomerate International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation (later\nITT Corporation\n), under investigation for corrupt financial ties to the White House, had sabotaged a democratic election in\nChile\n; and that Mitchell may have interfered in the major securities fraud case of a $250,000 donor to the Nixon campaign.\nIn the middle of April—with Mitchell and other top aides facing indictment—the president nervously announced that his own investigations had determined that “no one in this Administration, presently employed, was involved in this very bizarre incident.” On April 17 presidential spokesman Ziegler infamously told the press that all previous White House statements about Watergate were now “inoperative.” Two weeks later, on April 30, 1973, Nixon gave a major televised address announcing the resignations of Dean; his two closest aides by far, Haldeman and\nJohn D. Ehrlichman\n; and Attorney General\nRichard Kleindienst. Nixon protested his own innocence and promised cooperation with future investigations (even while including legalistic language that implied strong limits to that cooperation).\nThe\nErvin hearings\nBy the time the Ervin hearings began on May 17, a new\ntenor\nfor American political life had been set: eye-popping revelations of nearly undreamed-of venality at the heart of American power, followed by increasingly threadbare\nOval Office\nprotestations of innocence. It would not let up for the next 15 months. The daily televised hearings were quite possibly comparable in drama, import, and historic depth to the\nConstitutional Convention\nof 1787, the\nLincoln-Douglas debates\nof 1858, and the\nParis Peace Conference\nof 1919–20. Presided over by four Democrats led by Chairman Ervin—who became a folk hero (and to some a folk villain)—and three Republicans led by Vice Chairman Howard Baker of Tennessee, the hearings were at first covered gavel-to-gavel on all three commercial television networks—a business sacrifice that spoke to the remarkable civic high-mindedness with which the country approached the Watergate\ninquiry\n. Soon the networks began showing the hearings on a rotating basis. Some\nPublic Broadcasting Service\n(PBS) stations, however, continued to broadcast the hearings live daily, other PBS stations reran telecasts of the hearings at night, while still others did both.\nTrading volume shot down on the\nNew York Stock Exchange\n. Housewives threatened not to do a stitch of housework for as long as the hearings lasted. College students gathered around TV sets in corridors between, and sometimes during, classes; high schools set up TVs in the cafeteria for all-day civics lessons. “Never have I enjoyed watching television more than in the last two weeks,” one\nWashington Post\nletter writer testified, “with the\nspectacle\nof high human drama interwoven with the finest possible example of the democratic process at work unfolding before my eyes for hours on end, with no rehearsal, no canned laughter, very little commentary (none needed!), and, best of all, almost no commercial interruption!”\nThe feeling was not universal. Sticklers, including independent prosecutor\nArchibald Cox, decried the unfairness of what he characterized as trying the principals in the media. Game-show and soap-opera fans complained about the preemption of their favourite programs. Most significantly for the later ideological direction of the country, though hardly noticed by elites at the time, large portions of Americans derided the entire business as a political\nwitch hunt\n(and would continue to so view it into the 21st century). Still, some 35 million or so Americans watched the Ervin hearings at one time or another.\nWhat did they see? Methodical portraiture of a White House riddled with unprecedented and extra-constitutional paranoia and corruption from the beginning, painted by a bipartisan panel backed by the awesomely thorough staff work of some of the best young legal minds in Washington (among them\nHillary Rodham Clinton\n, who worked for the House Judiciary Committee during the impeachment hearings). In the spring of 1969, national security adviser\nHenry Kissinger\nhad wiretapped his staffers. In 1970 the White House set up an illegal money-laundering operation to fund its favoured Senate candidates. In 1971, after the disillusioned military analyst\nDaniel Ellsberg\nleaked the\nPentagon Papers\n, the White House seemed to institutionalize what some have characterized as a\nculture\nof illegality. One young staffer named Tom Charles Huston had earlier recommended a plan, approved and then withdrawn by the president, that called for dramatically expanded illegal domestic spying activities by the\nCIA\n, FBI, and other intelligence agencies. His specific plan was rejected, but a very similar operation—which Americans came to know as the “Plumbers,” so called because its original purpose was to ferret out leaks—was soon at work carrying out some of the same tasks.\nIt was revealed that, as the 1972 campaign season rolled around, roving cells of saboteurs devised ways to weaken individual Democratic presidential campaigns while making it look like the campaigns were actually sabotaging each other. A parallel fascination of the hearings was the questioning of young Nixon aides who left senators\nincredulous\nwith their explanations that “ends-justifies-the-means”\nmorality\nhad become semiofficial White House policy. Another continuing thread was the examination of illegal sources of the money that funded the various\nclandestine\noperations. The drama was further intensified by ongoing investigation of the White House’s attempts at stifling the panel’s investigation even as it was still under way. The\nmalfeasances\nmultiplied every week—dredged up not merely by the Ervin committee but by journalists, the Watergate grand jury, Watergate\nspecial prosecutor\nCox, and any number of related inquiries, including the trial in Los Angeles of Ellsberg (“Watergate West”), which had ended just before the Ervin hearings began.\nThe operative\nconstitutional\nquestion tying the complexity together was framed with special eloquence by Vice Chairman Baker: “What did the president know and when did he know it?” Nothing, Nixon continuously maintained. That\ncontention\nwas thrown melodramatically into doubt by Dean on June 25, 1973, in a nearly seven-hour statement to the Ervin committee, watched by a huge portion of the American television audience, followed by five days of intense cross-examination. Dean’s account established the president as the prime mover behind the scandal and cover-up. However, these revelations were greeted with\nskepticism\nby many. It appeared that the entire extraordinary business would devolve into a stalemate, the president’s word against one of his aides—until, on July 16,\nAlexander P. Butterfield, formerly of the White House staff, disclosed that all conversations in the president’s offices had secretly been recorded on tape.\nBoth Cox and the Ervin committee promptly subpoenaed the tapes of several key conversations. Nixon refused to provide them on the grounds of executive privilege and national security. When Judge Sirica ordered Nixon to turn over the tapes and that order was upheld by the U.S. Court of Appeals in October, Nixon offered instead to provide written summaries of the tapes in question in return for an agreement that no further presidential documents would be sought. Cox rejected the proposal, and on October 20 the president ordered Attorney General\nElliot Richardson to fire the special prosecutor. In an event that became known as the “\nSaturday Night Massacre\n,” both Richardson and\nWilliam D. Ruckelshaus\n, the deputy\nattorney general\n, resigned rather than carry out the order, and Cox was finally dismissed by a\ncompliant\nsolicitor general,\nRobert Bork\n. It was another extraordinary historical moment. Many responsible American officials literally feared a White House\ncoup d’état\n.\nA storm of public protest pressured Nixon into finally agreeing on October 23 to release the nine tapes asked for by Sirica, but, of the nine tapes specified in Sirica’s order, only seven were actually delivered, and one of the seven contained a gap of 18 and a half minutes that, according to a later report by a panel of experts, could not have been made accidentally. The\ncombined\nweight of all the allegations that had been made during the course of the investigation of the scandal led to the initiation of a formal impeachment inquiry by the House Judiciary Committee in May 1974. On May 20 Judge Sirica ordered Nixon to turn over additional tapes to Cox’s successor as special prosecutor,\nLeon Jaworski\n. On July 24 the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that Nixon must provide the recordings. Between July 27 and 30 the House Judiciary Committee passed three articles of impeachment. On August 5 the president supplied transcripts of three tapes that clearly implicated him in the cover-up. With these revelations, Nixon’s last support in Congress evaporated. He announced his resignation on August 8, stating that he no longer had “a strong enough political base” with which to govern. Nixon left office at noon the following day, August 9.","attrs_markdown":"[![Encyclopedia Britannica](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/mendel\/eb-logo\/MendelNewThistleLogo.png)](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/)\n\n[![Encyclopedia Britannica](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/mendel\/eb-logo\/MendelNewThistleLogo.png)](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/)\n\n[SUBSCRIBE](https:\/\/premium.britannica.com\/premium-membership\/?utm_source=premium&utm_medium=global-nav&utm_campaign=blue-evergreen)\n\n[SUBSCRIBE](https:\/\/premium.britannica.com\/premium-membership\/?utm_source=premium&utm_medium=global-nav-mobile&utm_campaign=blue-evergreen)\n\nLogin\n\nhttps:\/\/premium.britannica.com\/premium-membership\/?utm\\_source=premium\\&utm\\_medium=nav-login-box\\&utm\\_campaign=evergreen\n\n[SUBSCRIBE](https:\/\/premium.britannica.com\/premium-membership\/?utm_source=premium&utm_medium=hamburger-menu&utm_campaign=blue)\n\n[Ask the Chatbot](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/chatbot)\n\n[Games & Quizzes](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/quiz\/browse) [History & Society](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/History-Society) [Science & Tech](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/Science-Tech) [Biographies](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/Biographies) [Animals & Nature](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/Animals-Nature) [Geography & Travel](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/Geography-Travel) [Arts & Culture](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/Arts-Culture) [ProCon](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/procon) [Money](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/money) [Videos](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/videos)\n\n[Watergate scandal](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/event\/Watergate-Scandal)\n\n- [Introduction & Top Questions](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/event\/Watergate-Scandal)\n- [Burglary, arrest, and limited immediate political effect](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/event\/Watergate-Scandal#ref302381)\n- [Watergate trial and aftermath](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/event\/Watergate-Scandal\/Watergate-trial-and-aftermath)\n- [The Ervin hearings](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/event\/Watergate-Scandal\/Watergate-trial-and-aftermath#ref302383)\n- [Pardon and aftermath](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/event\/Watergate-Scandal\/Pardon-and-aftermath)\n\n[References & Edit History](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/event\/Watergate-Scandal\/additional-info)  [Quick Facts & Related Topics](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/facts\/Watergate-Scandal)\n\n[Images & Videos](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/event\/Watergate-Scandal\/images-videos)\n\n[![Watergate scandal](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/15\/164715-004-8F848322\/Pres-Charles-Wendell-Colson-Richard-M-Nixon.jpg)](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/15\/164715-050-FC023F27\/Pres-Charles-Wendell-Colson-Richard-M-Nixon.jpg)  [![Watergate complex](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/40\/103040-004-956ECE2D\/complex-Washington-DC.jpg)](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/40\/103040-050-A6E50377\/complex-Washington-DC.jpg)  [![Colson, Charles; Haldeman, H.R.](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/12\/164712-004-012351DD\/Charles-Colson-Haldeman-HR.jpg)](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/12\/164712-050-B20C32ED\/Charles-Colson-Haldeman-HR.jpg)  [![Mark Felt](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/00\/193100-004-FC31DCA3\/Mark-Felt.jpg)](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/00\/193100-050-62FBA99B\/Mark-Felt.jpg)  [![John Dean](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/16\/164716-004-B789B897\/John-Dean.jpg)](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/16\/164716-050-B2927A3E\/John-Dean.jpg)\n\n[![See U.S. president Richard M. Nixon speaking about the Watergate scandal](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/97\/23197-138-21E576D3\/Richard-M-Nixon-release-tapes-November-17-1973.jpg?w=400&h=225&c=crop)](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/video\/Richard-M-Nixon-release-tapes-November-17-1973\/-13236)\n\n[![Richard Nixon: farewell speech](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/62\/164762-004-80E39888\/Richard-Nixon-Tricia-Cox-cabinet-farewell-staff-August-9-1974.jpg)](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/62\/164762-050-068E5A98\/Richard-Nixon-Tricia-Cox-cabinet-farewell-staff-August-9-1974.jpg)  [![Gerald Ford](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/34\/164734-004-3A1C7DEA\/president-Gerald-R-Ford-August-9-1974.jpg)](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/34\/164734-050-0B303BC9\/president-Gerald-R-Ford-August-9-1974.jpg)\n\nAt a Glance\n\n[![Watergate scandal](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/15\/164715-050-FC023F27\/Pres-Charles-Wendell-Colson-Richard-M-Nixon.jpg?w=200&h=200&c=crop)](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/summary\/Watergate-Scandal)\n\n[Watergate scandal summary](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/summary\/Watergate-Scandal)\n\nQuizzes\n\n[![Graphic artwork represents music of the seventies - (source file includes the fifties, sixties, eighties, and nineties, 50s, 60s, 70, 80s, 90s, decades)](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/12\/255012-131-F43B16A9\/artwork-70s-music.jpg?w=200&h=200&c=crop)](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/quiz\/that-groovy-70s-quiz)\n\n[That Groovy ’70s Quiz](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/quiz\/that-groovy-70s-quiz)\n\nRelated Questions\n\n- [What was the Watergate scandal?](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/question\/What-was-the-Watergate-scandal)\n- [Who were the five burglars at the DNC office in the Watergate office complex?](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/question\/Who-were-the-five-burglars-at-the-DNC-office-in-the-Watergate-office-complex)\n- [What is the Kennedy Center?](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/question\/What-is-the-Kennedy-Center)\n- [Is the Kennedy Center closed?](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/question\/Is-the-Kennedy-Center-closed)\n- [Why did Donald Trump take over the Kennedy Center?](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/question\/Why-did-Donald-Trump-take-over-the-Kennedy-Center)\n\n![Britannica AI Icon](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/mendel-resources\/3-179\/images\/chatbot\/star-ai.svg?v=3.179.9)\n\nContents\n\nAsk Anything\n\n[Politics, Law & Government](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/browse\/Politics-Law-Government)    [Law, Crime & Punishment](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/browse\/Law-Crime-Punishment)\n\nCITE\n\nShare\n\nFeedback\n\nExternal Websites\n\n# Watergate trial and aftermath\nin\n\n# [Watergate scandal](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/event\/Watergate-Scandal)\n\nHomework Help\n\nWritten by\n\n[Rick Perlstein Historian and journalist. Author of *Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America* and others.](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/contributor\/Rick-Perlstein\/9057786)\n\nRick Perlstein\n\nFact-checked by\n\n[Britannica Editors Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree....](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/editor\/The-Editors-of-Encyclopaedia-Britannica\/4419)\n\nBritannica Editors\n\nLast updated\n\nMar. 24, 2026\n\n•[History](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/event\/Watergate-Scandal\/additional-info#history)\n\n![Britannica AI Icon](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/mendel-resources\/3-179\/images\/chatbot\/star-ai.svg?v=3.179.9) Britannica AI\n\nAsk Anything\n\nTable of Contents\n\nTable of Contents\n\nAsk Anything\n\nThe trial of the five arrested burglars and two accomplices began in federal court less than two weeks before Nixon’s second-term inauguration. The relatively narrow indictment on charges of [burglary](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/burglary), [conspiracy](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/conspiracy), and violation of federal wiretapping laws itself spoke to the success of the [White House](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/White-House-Washington-DC) in containing the scandal. The presiding judge, [John J. Sirica](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/biography\/John-Sirica), however, kept badgering defendants and witnesses on matters not covered in the indictment—namely, the financial and institutional involvement of the White House and reelection campaign.\n\n## News •\n[Bob Woodward to 'lift the lid' on decades of reporting in new memoir 'Secrets'](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/news\/637431\/82db1394bb04fd7ce361bdfdba62c563)  • Mar. 24, 2026, 6:00 AM ET (AP)\n\nShow less\n\nAll the defendants pleaded guilty except Liddy and McCord, who were convicted at the end of January. The court was scheduled to reconvene on March 23 to hear sentences. In the [interim](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/interim) the Senate voted 77–0 to establish a special investigating committee on abuses in the 1972 presidential campaign (the Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities) to be presided over by the universally respected [conservative](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/conservative) [North Carolina](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/place\/North-Carolina-state) Democrat [Samuel J. Ervin, Jr.](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/biography\/Samuel-J-Ervin-Jr) A strict constitutionalist, Ervin had been speaking out angrily on Nixon’s extraordinary extensions of presidential power, including the unprecedented presidential “impoundment” of funds authorized for expenditure by Congress and his continuation of the bombing of Cambodia even after a cease-fire had been agreed to in the [Vietnam War](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/event\/Vietnam-War).\n\n[![John Dean](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/16\/164716-050-B2927A3E\/John-Dean.jpg?w=300)](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/16\/164716-050-B2927A3E\/John-Dean.jpg)\n\n[John Dean](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/16\/164716-050-B2927A3E\/John-Dean.jpg)The former White House counsel testified in June 1973 before the Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities regardin the Watergate scandal.\n\n(more)\n\nAt the beginning of March, during Senate confirmation hearings of Nixon’s nominee to head the [FBI](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/Federal-Bureau-of-Investigation), L. Patrick Gray, it was [alleged](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/alleged) that a little-known White House legal aide named [John Wesley Dean III](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/biography\/John-Wesley-Dean-III) had been given personal access to the FBI’s Watergate investigation. This revelation was followed almost immediately by the president’s unprecedentedly sweeping refusal, under the claim of “[executive privilege](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/executive-privilege),” to allow aides such as Dean to testify before Congress. Ervin responded that if the president pressed the issue, he would issue arrest warrants to compel Nixon aides to testify.\n\nMeanwhile, Sirica controversially sought to leverage the hearings and continued [grand jury](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/grand-jury) proceedings to induce the defendants to speak more forthrightly about a broader conspiracy. He succeeded when defendant McCord passed him an extraordinary presentencing letter, in which he explained that the defendants had been pressured to plead guilty and perjure themselves about the involvement of higher-ups. On March 23 Sirica read the letter in open court. He then took the [contentious](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/contentious) step of passing exceptionally long “provisional” sentences on the defendants. However, Sirica made clear that were the defendants to speak frankly to the reconvened Watergate grand jury or the Senate hearings, he would reduce their sentences.\n\nAlmost single-handedly, with great courage and risk to his reputation, Sirica had broken the case wide open. [Revelations](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/dictionary\/Revelations) began cascading through the press: that Gray may have been involved in the cover-up; that the transnational conglomerate International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation (later [ITT Corporation](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/money\/ITT-Corporation)), under investigation for corrupt financial ties to the White House, had sabotaged a democratic election in [Chile](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/place\/Chile); and that Mitchell may have interfered in the major securities fraud case of a \\$250,000 donor to the Nixon campaign.\n\nIn the middle of April—with Mitchell and other top aides facing indictment—the president nervously announced that his own investigations had determined that “no one in this Administration, presently employed, was involved in this very bizarre incident.” On April 17 presidential spokesman Ziegler infamously told the press that all previous White House statements about Watergate were now “inoperative.” Two weeks later, on April 30, 1973, Nixon gave a major televised address announcing the resignations of Dean; his two closest aides by far, Haldeman and [John D. Ehrlichman](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/biography\/John-D-Ehrlichman); and Attorney General Richard Kleindienst. Nixon protested his own innocence and promised cooperation with future investigations (even while including legalistic language that implied strong limits to that cooperation).\n\n## The [Ervin hearings](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/biography\/Samuel-J-Ervin-Jr)\nBy the time the Ervin hearings began on May 17, a new [tenor](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/dictionary\/tenor) for American political life had been set: eye-popping revelations of nearly undreamed-of venality at the heart of American power, followed by increasingly threadbare [Oval Office](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/Oval-Office) protestations of innocence. It would not let up for the next 15 months. The daily televised hearings were quite possibly comparable in drama, import, and historic depth to the [Constitutional Convention](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/event\/Constitutional-Convention) of 1787, the [Lincoln-Douglas debates](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/event\/Lincoln-Douglas-debates) of 1858, and the [Paris Peace Conference](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/event\/Paris-Peace-Conference) of 1919–20. Presided over by four Democrats led by Chairman Ervin—who became a folk hero (and to some a folk villain)—and three Republicans led by Vice Chairman Howard Baker of Tennessee, the hearings were at first covered gavel-to-gavel on all three commercial television networks—a business sacrifice that spoke to the remarkable civic high-mindedness with which the country approached the Watergate [inquiry](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/dictionary\/inquiry). Soon the networks began showing the hearings on a rotating basis. Some [Public Broadcasting Service](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/Public-Broadcasting-Service) (PBS) stations, however, continued to broadcast the hearings live daily, other PBS stations reran telecasts of the hearings at night, while still others did both.\n\nTrading volume shot down on the [New York Stock Exchange](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/money\/New-York-Stock-Exchange). Housewives threatened not to do a stitch of housework for as long as the hearings lasted. College students gathered around TV sets in corridors between, and sometimes during, classes; high schools set up TVs in the cafeteria for all-day civics lessons. “Never have I enjoyed watching television more than in the last two weeks,” one *Washington Post* letter writer testified, “with the [spectacle](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/dictionary\/spectacle) of high human drama interwoven with the finest possible example of the democratic process at work unfolding before my eyes for hours on end, with no rehearsal, no canned laughter, very little commentary (none needed!), and, best of all, almost no commercial interruption!”\n\nThe feeling was not universal. Sticklers, including independent prosecutor Archibald Cox, decried the unfairness of what he characterized as trying the principals in the media. Game-show and soap-opera fans complained about the preemption of their favourite programs. Most significantly for the later ideological direction of the country, though hardly noticed by elites at the time, large portions of Americans derided the entire business as a political [witch hunt](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/witch-hunt) (and would continue to so view it into the 21st century). Still, some 35 million or so Americans watched the Ervin hearings at one time or another.\n\nWhat did they see? Methodical portraiture of a White House riddled with unprecedented and extra-constitutional paranoia and corruption from the beginning, painted by a bipartisan panel backed by the awesomely thorough staff work of some of the best young legal minds in Washington (among them [Hillary Rodham Clinton](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/biography\/Hillary-Clinton), who worked for the House Judiciary Committee during the impeachment hearings). In the spring of 1969, national security adviser [Henry Kissinger](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/biography\/Henry-Kissinger) had wiretapped his staffers. In 1970 the White House set up an illegal money-laundering operation to fund its favoured Senate candidates. In 1971, after the disillusioned military analyst [Daniel Ellsberg](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/biography\/Daniel-Ellsberg) leaked the [Pentagon Papers](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/Pentagon-Papers), the White House seemed to institutionalize what some have characterized as a [culture](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/culture) of illegality. One young staffer named Tom Charles Huston had earlier recommended a plan, approved and then withdrawn by the president, that called for dramatically expanded illegal domestic spying activities by the [CIA](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/Central-Intelligence-Agency), FBI, and other intelligence agencies. His specific plan was rejected, but a very similar operation—which Americans came to know as the “Plumbers,” so called because its original purpose was to ferret out leaks—was soon at work carrying out some of the same tasks.\n\nIt was revealed that, as the 1972 campaign season rolled around, roving cells of saboteurs devised ways to weaken individual Democratic presidential campaigns while making it look like the campaigns were actually sabotaging each other. A parallel fascination of the hearings was the questioning of young Nixon aides who left senators [incredulous](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/incredulous) with their explanations that “ends-justifies-the-means” [morality](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/morality) had become semiofficial White House policy. Another continuing thread was the examination of illegal sources of the money that funded the various [clandestine](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/clandestine) operations. The drama was further intensified by ongoing investigation of the White House’s attempts at stifling the panel’s investigation even as it was still under way. The [malfeasances](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/malfeasances) multiplied every week—dredged up not merely by the Ervin committee but by journalists, the Watergate grand jury, Watergate [special prosecutor](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/independent-counsel) Cox, and any number of related inquiries, including the trial in Los Angeles of Ellsberg (“Watergate West”), which had ended just before the Ervin hearings began.\n\nThe operative [constitutional](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/constitutional) question tying the complexity together was framed with special eloquence by Vice Chairman Baker: “What did the president know and when did he know it?” Nothing, Nixon continuously maintained. That [contention](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/contention) was thrown melodramatically into doubt by Dean on June 25, 1973, in a nearly seven-hour statement to the Ervin committee, watched by a huge portion of the American television audience, followed by five days of intense cross-examination. Dean’s account established the president as the prime mover behind the scandal and cover-up. However, these revelations were greeted with [skepticism](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/skepticism) by many. It appeared that the entire extraordinary business would devolve into a stalemate, the president’s word against one of his aides—until, on July 16, Alexander P. Butterfield, formerly of the White House staff, disclosed that all conversations in the president’s offices had secretly been recorded on tape.\n\nBoth Cox and the Ervin committee promptly subpoenaed the tapes of several key conversations. Nixon refused to provide them on the grounds of executive privilege and national security. When Judge Sirica ordered Nixon to turn over the tapes and that order was upheld by the U.S. Court of Appeals in October, Nixon offered instead to provide written summaries of the tapes in question in return for an agreement that no further presidential documents would be sought. Cox rejected the proposal, and on October 20 the president ordered Attorney General Elliot Richardson to fire the special prosecutor. In an event that became known as the “[Saturday Night Massacre](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/Saturday-Night-Massacre),” both Richardson and [William D. Ruckelshaus](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/biography\/William-D-Ruckelshaus), the deputy [attorney general](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/attorney-general), resigned rather than carry out the order, and Cox was finally dismissed by a [compliant](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/compliant) solicitor general, [Robert Bork](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/biography\/Robert-H-Bork). It was another extraordinary historical moment. Many responsible American officials literally feared a White House [coup d’état](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/coup-detat).\n\n[![See U.S. president Richard M. Nixon speaking about the Watergate scandal](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/97\/23197-138-21E576D3\/Richard-M-Nixon-release-tapes-November-17-1973.jpg?w=800&h=450&c=crop)1 of 2](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/video\/Richard-M-Nixon-release-tapes-November-17-1973\/-13236)\n\nSee U.S. president Richard M. Nixon speaking about the Watergate scandalU.S. Pres. Richard M. Nixon speaking about the release of the Watergate tapes (“I am not a crook”), November 17, 1973.\n\n(more)\n\n[See all videos for this article](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/event\/Watergate-Scandal\/images-videos)\n\n[![Richard Nixon: farewell speech](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/62\/164762-050-068E5A98\/Richard-Nixon-Tricia-Cox-cabinet-farewell-staff-August-9-1974.jpg?w=300)2 of 2](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/62\/164762-050-068E5A98\/Richard-Nixon-Tricia-Cox-cabinet-farewell-staff-August-9-1974.jpg)\n\n[Richard Nixon: farewell speech](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/62\/164762-050-068E5A98\/Richard-Nixon-Tricia-Cox-cabinet-farewell-staff-August-9-1974.jpg)U.S. Pres. Richard Nixon, with his daughter Tricia Cox looking on, bidding farewell to his cabinet and White House staff shortly before his resignation took effect, August 9, 1974.\n\n(more)\n\n[Richard M. Nixon resignation announcement](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/78\/70178-005-E7133FA1\/Richard-M-Nixon-resignation-presidency-August-8-1974.mp3)U.S. Pres. Richard M. Nixon announcing his resignation from the presidency, August 8, 1974.\n\n(more)\n\nA storm of public protest pressured Nixon into finally agreeing on October 23 to release the nine tapes asked for by Sirica, but, of the nine tapes specified in Sirica’s order, only seven were actually delivered, and one of the seven contained a gap of 18 and a half minutes that, according to a later report by a panel of experts, could not have been made accidentally. The [combined](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/dictionary\/combined) weight of all the allegations that had been made during the course of the investigation of the scandal led to the initiation of a formal impeachment inquiry by the House Judiciary Committee in May 1974. On May 20 Judge Sirica ordered Nixon to turn over additional tapes to Cox’s successor as special prosecutor, [Leon Jaworski](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/biography\/Leon-Jaworski). On July 24 the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that Nixon must provide the recordings. Between July 27 and 30 the House Judiciary Committee passed three articles of impeachment. On August 5 the president supplied transcripts of three tapes that clearly implicated him in the cover-up. With these revelations, Nixon’s last support in Congress evaporated. He announced his resignation on August 8, stating that he no longer had “a strong enough political base” with which to govern. Nixon left office at noon the following day, August 9.\n\n![Britannica AI Icon](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/mendel-resources\/3-179\/images\/chatbot\/star-ai.svg?v=3.179.9)Britannica AI\n\n*chevron\\_right*\n\nWatergate scandal - Political Corruption, Nixon Resignation, Cover-up\n\n*close*\n\n[AI-generated answers](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/about-britannica-ai) from Britannica articles. AI makes mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles.\n\n# Pardon and aftermath\n[![Gerald Ford](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/34\/164734-050-0B303BC9\/president-Gerald-R-Ford-August-9-1974.jpg?w=300)](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/34\/164734-050-0B303BC9\/president-Gerald-R-Ford-August-9-1974.jpg)\n\n[Gerald Ford](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/34\/164734-050-0B303BC9\/president-Gerald-R-Ford-August-9-1974.jpg)Gerald Ford being sworn in as U.S. president, August 9, 1974.\n\n(more)\n\nOn September 8, 1974, the new president, [Gerald Ford](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/biography\/Gerald-Ford), chose to grant Nixon a full and [unconditional](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/dictionary\/unconditional) [pardon](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/pardon) for any crimes he may have committed while president. Ford had become vice president in December 1973, after Nixon’s previous vice president, [Spiro T. Agnew](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/biography\/Spiro-Agnew), resigned amid accusations of financial improprieties and pled no contest to a single, negotiated criminal charge. By the time of the pardon, enough Americans had become convinced that Nixon (named by the Watergate [grand jury](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/grand-jury) as an “un-indicted co-conspirator”) was guilty of crimes and that Ford had pardoned him as [quid pro quo](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/quid-pro-quo) for becoming president that the approval rating of the otherwise popular new president collapsed overnight.\n\nThis loss of faith in the new chief executive spoke to the extraordinary [cynicism](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/cynicism) that marked the national mood 27 months into a scandal in which a clutch of Nixon’s closest aides eventually went to jail. For the rest of the decade both popular and [political culture](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/political-culture) were suffused with paranoia and disillusionment. [Ronald Reagan](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/biography\/Ronald-Reagan)’s ascent to the presidency in 1980 had very much to do with his [rhetorical](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/rhetorical) ability to break the cloud of gloom that Watergate, along with the U.S. failure in the [Vietnam War](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/event\/Vietnam-War), had cast upon the country. Even in the early 21st century the [legacy](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/legacy) of Watergate continued to haunt American politics. Watergate was so synonymous with scandal that it became common practice for the press to tack on a *\\-gate* to the scandal du jour, from “Tailhook-Gate” to “Troopergate.” The former president and then, after his death, his family spent a great deal of money on a legal campaign to prevent the entirety of his tapes from being released. That effort failed, and the entire taped record of the Nixon [White House](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/White-House-Washington-DC) eventually became available to the public. Scholars continue to mine the tapes for insights, including the discovery that Nixon ordered the firebombing of the Washington, [D.C.](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/place\/Washington-DC), [think tank](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/think-tank) the [Brookings Institution](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/Brookings-Institution) (never carried out) in an attempt to remove records suggesting that he had conspired to [sabotage](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/dictionary\/sabotage) the 1968 Paris peace talks so that his Democratic opponent in that year’s presidential election, Vice Pres. [Hubert Humphrey](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/biography\/Hubert-Humphrey), could not run on a record of having helped end the Vietnam War.\n\n[Rick Perlstein](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/contributor\/Rick-Perlstein\/9057786)\n\nLoad Next Page\n\nFeedback\n\nThank you for your feedback\n\nOur editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.\n\n*print* Print\n\nPlease select which sections you would like to print:\n\n*verified*Cite\n\nWhile every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions.\n\nSelect Citation Style\n\nPerlstein, Rick. \"Watergate scandal\". *Encyclopedia Britannica*, 24 Mar. 2026, https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/event\/Watergate-Scandal. Accessed 15 April 2026.\n\nCopy Citation\n\nShare\n\nShare to social media\n\n[Facebook](https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/BRITANNICA\/) [X](https:\/\/x.com\/britannica)\n\nURL\n\n<https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/event\/Watergate-Scandal>\n\nExternal Websites\n\n- [Teach Democracy - The Watergate Scandal](https:\/\/teachdemocracy.org\/online-lesson\/the-watergate-scandal\/)\n- [Gerald R. Ford Ford Library and Museum - The Watergate Files](https:\/\/www.fordlibrarymuseum.gov\/exhibits\/watergate-files#event-number-1149)\n- [Florida State College at Jacksonville Pressbooks - U.S. History II: 1877 to Present - Watergate and Jimmy Carter](https:\/\/fscj.pressbooks.pub\/modernushistory\/chapter\/watergate-and-jimmy-carter\/)\n- [History Today - What was the Legacy of the Watergate Scandal?](https:\/\/www.historytoday.com\/archive\/head-head\/what-was-legacy-watergate-scandal)\n- [Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia - Miller Center - The Watergate story](https:\/\/millercenter.org\/the-presidency\/educational-resources\/watergate)\n- [Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library and Museum - The Watergate Files](https:\/\/www.fordlibrarymuseum.gov\/exhibits\/watergate-files#event-number-1154)\n- [Nixon Library Foundation - Watergate Explained](https:\/\/www.nixonfoundation.org\/watergate-explained\/)\n- [Digital History - Watergate](https:\/\/www.digitalhistory.uh.edu\/disp_textbook.cfm?smtID=2&psid=3352)\n\nBritannica Websites\n\nArticles from Britannica Encyclopedias for elementary and high school students.\n\n- [Watergate scandal - Student Encyclopedia (Ages 11 and up)](https:\/\/kids.britannica.com\/students\/article\/Watergate-scandal\/599601)","attrs_readable_markdown":"The trial of the five arrested burglars and two accomplices began in federal court less than two weeks before Nixon’s second-term inauguration. The relatively narrow indictment on charges of [burglary](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/burglary), [conspiracy](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/conspiracy), and violation of federal wiretapping laws itself spoke to the success of the [White House](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/White-House-Washington-DC) in containing the scandal. The presiding judge, [John J. Sirica](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/biography\/John-Sirica), however, kept badgering defendants and witnesses on matters not covered in the indictment—namely, the financial and institutional involvement of the White House and reelection campaign.\n\n## News •\nAll the defendants pleaded guilty except Liddy and McCord, who were convicted at the end of January. The court was scheduled to reconvene on March 23 to hear sentences. In the [interim](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/interim) the Senate voted 77–0 to establish a special investigating committee on abuses in the 1972 presidential campaign (the Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities) to be presided over by the universally respected [conservative](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/conservative) [North Carolina](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/place\/North-Carolina-state) Democrat [Samuel J. Ervin, Jr.](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/biography\/Samuel-J-Ervin-Jr) A strict constitutionalist, Ervin had been speaking out angrily on Nixon’s extraordinary extensions of presidential power, including the unprecedented presidential “impoundment” of funds authorized for expenditure by Congress and his continuation of the bombing of Cambodia even after a cease-fire had been agreed to in the [Vietnam War](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/event\/Vietnam-War).\n\n[John Dean](https:\/\/cdn.britannica.com\/16\/164716-050-B2927A3E\/John-Dean.jpg)The former White House counsel testified in June 1973 before the Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities regardin the Watergate scandal.\n\nAt the beginning of March, during Senate confirmation hearings of Nixon’s nominee to head the [FBI](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/Federal-Bureau-of-Investigation), L. Patrick Gray, it was [alleged](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/alleged) that a little-known White House legal aide named [John Wesley Dean III](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/biography\/John-Wesley-Dean-III) had been given personal access to the FBI’s Watergate investigation. This revelation was followed almost immediately by the president’s unprecedentedly sweeping refusal, under the claim of “[executive privilege](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/executive-privilege),” to allow aides such as Dean to testify before Congress. Ervin responded that if the president pressed the issue, he would issue arrest warrants to compel Nixon aides to testify.\n\nMeanwhile, Sirica controversially sought to leverage the hearings and continued [grand jury](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/grand-jury) proceedings to induce the defendants to speak more forthrightly about a broader conspiracy. He succeeded when defendant McCord passed him an extraordinary presentencing letter, in which he explained that the defendants had been pressured to plead guilty and perjure themselves about the involvement of higher-ups. On March 23 Sirica read the letter in open court. He then took the [contentious](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/contentious) step of passing exceptionally long “provisional” sentences on the defendants. However, Sirica made clear that were the defendants to speak frankly to the reconvened Watergate grand jury or the Senate hearings, he would reduce their sentences.\n\nAlmost single-handedly, with great courage and risk to his reputation, Sirica had broken the case wide open. [Revelations](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/dictionary\/Revelations) began cascading through the press: that Gray may have been involved in the cover-up; that the transnational conglomerate International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation (later [ITT Corporation](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/money\/ITT-Corporation)), under investigation for corrupt financial ties to the White House, had sabotaged a democratic election in [Chile](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/place\/Chile); and that Mitchell may have interfered in the major securities fraud case of a \\$250,000 donor to the Nixon campaign.\n\nIn the middle of April—with Mitchell and other top aides facing indictment—the president nervously announced that his own investigations had determined that “no one in this Administration, presently employed, was involved in this very bizarre incident.” On April 17 presidential spokesman Ziegler infamously told the press that all previous White House statements about Watergate were now “inoperative.” Two weeks later, on April 30, 1973, Nixon gave a major televised address announcing the resignations of Dean; his two closest aides by far, Haldeman and [John D. Ehrlichman](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/biography\/John-D-Ehrlichman); and Attorney General Richard Kleindienst. Nixon protested his own innocence and promised cooperation with future investigations (even while including legalistic language that implied strong limits to that cooperation).\n\n## The [Ervin hearings](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/biography\/Samuel-J-Ervin-Jr)\nBy the time the Ervin hearings began on May 17, a new [tenor](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/dictionary\/tenor) for American political life had been set: eye-popping revelations of nearly undreamed-of venality at the heart of American power, followed by increasingly threadbare [Oval Office](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/Oval-Office) protestations of innocence. It would not let up for the next 15 months. The daily televised hearings were quite possibly comparable in drama, import, and historic depth to the [Constitutional Convention](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/event\/Constitutional-Convention) of 1787, the [Lincoln-Douglas debates](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/event\/Lincoln-Douglas-debates) of 1858, and the [Paris Peace Conference](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/event\/Paris-Peace-Conference) of 1919–20. Presided over by four Democrats led by Chairman Ervin—who became a folk hero (and to some a folk villain)—and three Republicans led by Vice Chairman Howard Baker of Tennessee, the hearings were at first covered gavel-to-gavel on all three commercial television networks—a business sacrifice that spoke to the remarkable civic high-mindedness with which the country approached the Watergate [inquiry](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/dictionary\/inquiry). Soon the networks began showing the hearings on a rotating basis. Some [Public Broadcasting Service](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/Public-Broadcasting-Service) (PBS) stations, however, continued to broadcast the hearings live daily, other PBS stations reran telecasts of the hearings at night, while still others did both.\n\nTrading volume shot down on the [New York Stock Exchange](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/money\/New-York-Stock-Exchange). Housewives threatened not to do a stitch of housework for as long as the hearings lasted. College students gathered around TV sets in corridors between, and sometimes during, classes; high schools set up TVs in the cafeteria for all-day civics lessons. “Never have I enjoyed watching television more than in the last two weeks,” one *Washington Post* letter writer testified, “with the [spectacle](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/dictionary\/spectacle) of high human drama interwoven with the finest possible example of the democratic process at work unfolding before my eyes for hours on end, with no rehearsal, no canned laughter, very little commentary (none needed!), and, best of all, almost no commercial interruption!”\n\nThe feeling was not universal. Sticklers, including independent prosecutor Archibald Cox, decried the unfairness of what he characterized as trying the principals in the media. Game-show and soap-opera fans complained about the preemption of their favourite programs. Most significantly for the later ideological direction of the country, though hardly noticed by elites at the time, large portions of Americans derided the entire business as a political [witch hunt](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/witch-hunt) (and would continue to so view it into the 21st century). Still, some 35 million or so Americans watched the Ervin hearings at one time or another.\n\nWhat did they see? Methodical portraiture of a White House riddled with unprecedented and extra-constitutional paranoia and corruption from the beginning, painted by a bipartisan panel backed by the awesomely thorough staff work of some of the best young legal minds in Washington (among them [Hillary Rodham Clinton](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/biography\/Hillary-Clinton), who worked for the House Judiciary Committee during the impeachment hearings). In the spring of 1969, national security adviser [Henry Kissinger](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/biography\/Henry-Kissinger) had wiretapped his staffers. In 1970 the White House set up an illegal money-laundering operation to fund its favoured Senate candidates. In 1971, after the disillusioned military analyst [Daniel Ellsberg](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/biography\/Daniel-Ellsberg) leaked the [Pentagon Papers](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/Pentagon-Papers), the White House seemed to institutionalize what some have characterized as a [culture](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/culture) of illegality. One young staffer named Tom Charles Huston had earlier recommended a plan, approved and then withdrawn by the president, that called for dramatically expanded illegal domestic spying activities by the [CIA](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/Central-Intelligence-Agency), FBI, and other intelligence agencies. His specific plan was rejected, but a very similar operation—which Americans came to know as the “Plumbers,” so called because its original purpose was to ferret out leaks—was soon at work carrying out some of the same tasks.\n\nIt was revealed that, as the 1972 campaign season rolled around, roving cells of saboteurs devised ways to weaken individual Democratic presidential campaigns while making it look like the campaigns were actually sabotaging each other. A parallel fascination of the hearings was the questioning of young Nixon aides who left senators [incredulous](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/incredulous) with their explanations that “ends-justifies-the-means” [morality](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/morality) had become semiofficial White House policy. Another continuing thread was the examination of illegal sources of the money that funded the various [clandestine](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/clandestine) operations. The drama was further intensified by ongoing investigation of the White House’s attempts at stifling the panel’s investigation even as it was still under way. The [malfeasances](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/malfeasances) multiplied every week—dredged up not merely by the Ervin committee but by journalists, the Watergate grand jury, Watergate [special prosecutor](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/independent-counsel) Cox, and any number of related inquiries, including the trial in Los Angeles of Ellsberg (“Watergate West”), which had ended just before the Ervin hearings began.\n\nThe operative [constitutional](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/constitutional) question tying the complexity together was framed with special eloquence by Vice Chairman Baker: “What did the president know and when did he know it?” Nothing, Nixon continuously maintained. That [contention](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/contention) was thrown melodramatically into doubt by Dean on June 25, 1973, in a nearly seven-hour statement to the Ervin committee, watched by a huge portion of the American television audience, followed by five days of intense cross-examination. Dean’s account established the president as the prime mover behind the scandal and cover-up. However, these revelations were greeted with [skepticism](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/skepticism) by many. It appeared that the entire extraordinary business would devolve into a stalemate, the president’s word against one of his aides—until, on July 16, Alexander P. Butterfield, formerly of the White House staff, disclosed that all conversations in the president’s offices had secretly been recorded on tape.\n\nBoth Cox and the Ervin committee promptly subpoenaed the tapes of several key conversations. Nixon refused to provide them on the grounds of executive privilege and national security. When Judge Sirica ordered Nixon to turn over the tapes and that order was upheld by the U.S. Court of Appeals in October, Nixon offered instead to provide written summaries of the tapes in question in return for an agreement that no further presidential documents would be sought. Cox rejected the proposal, and on October 20 the president ordered Attorney General Elliot Richardson to fire the special prosecutor. In an event that became known as the “[Saturday Night Massacre](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/Saturday-Night-Massacre),” both Richardson and [William D. Ruckelshaus](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/biography\/William-D-Ruckelshaus), the deputy [attorney general](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/attorney-general), resigned rather than carry out the order, and Cox was finally dismissed by a [compliant](https:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/dictionary\/compliant) solicitor general, [Robert Bork](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/biography\/Robert-H-Bork). It was another extraordinary historical moment. Many responsible American officials literally feared a White House [coup d’état](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/coup-detat).\n\nA storm of public protest pressured Nixon into finally agreeing on October 23 to release the nine tapes asked for by Sirica, but, of the nine tapes specified in Sirica’s order, only seven were actually delivered, and one of the seven contained a gap of 18 and a half minutes that, according to a later report by a panel of experts, could not have been made accidentally. The [combined](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/dictionary\/combined) weight of all the allegations that had been made during the course of the investigation of the scandal led to the initiation of a formal impeachment inquiry by the House Judiciary Committee in May 1974. On May 20 Judge Sirica ordered Nixon to turn over additional tapes to Cox’s successor as special prosecutor, [Leon Jaworski](https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/biography\/Leon-Jaworski). On July 24 the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that Nixon must provide the recordings. Between July 27 and 30 the House Judiciary Committee passed three articles of impeachment. On August 5 the president supplied transcripts of three tapes that clearly implicated him in the cover-up. With these revelations, Nixon’s last support in Congress evaporated. He announced his resignation on August 8, stating that he no longer had “a strong enough political base” with which to govern. Nixon left office at noon the following day, August 9.","meta_canonical":null}

3. Robots.txt Check

Query:

Response:

4. Spam/Ban Check

Query:

Response:

5. Seen Status Check

ℹ️ Skipped - page is already crawled

📄

INDEXABLE

✅

CRAWLED

3 days ago

🤖

ROBOTS ALLOWED

Page Info Filters

Filter	Status	Condition	Details
HTTP status	PASS	`download_http_code = 200`	HTTP 200
Age cutoff	PASS	`download_stamp > now() - 6 MONTH`	0.1 months ago
History drop	PASS	`isNull(history_drop_reason)`	No drop reason
Spam/ban	PASS	`fh_dont_index != 1 AND ml_spam_score = 0`	ml_spam_score=0
Canonical	PASS	`meta_canonical IS NULL OR = '' OR = src_unparsed`	Not set

Page Details

Property	Value
URL	https://www.britannica.com/event/Watergate-Scandal/Watergate-trial-and-aftermath
Last Crawled	2026-04-15 16:17:22 (3 days ago)
First Indexed	2019-07-19 09:48:14 (6 years ago)
HTTP Status Code	200
Meta Title	Watergate scandal - Political Corruption, Nixon Resignation, Cover-up \| Britannica
Meta Description	Watergate scandal - Political Corruption, Nixon Resignation, Cover-up: The trial of the five arrested burglars and two accomplices began in federal court less than two weeks before Nixon’s second-term inauguration. The relatively narrow indictment on charges of burglary, conspiracy, and violation of federal wiretapping laws itself spoke to the success of the White House in containing the scandal. The presiding judge, John J. Sirica, however, kept badgering defendants and witnesses on matters not covered in the indictment—namely, the financial and institutional involvement of the White House and reelection campaign. All the defendants pleaded guilty except Liddy and McCord, who were convicted at the end of January. The court
Meta Canonical	null
Boilerpipe Text	The trial of the five arrested burglars and two accomplices began in federal court less than two weeks before Nixon’s second-term inauguration. The relatively narrow indictment on charges of burglary , conspiracy , and violation of federal wiretapping laws itself spoke to the success of the White House in containing the scandal. The presiding judge, John J. Sirica , however, kept badgering defendants and witnesses on matters not covered in the indictment—namely, the financial and institutional involvement of the White House and reelection campaign. News • All the defendants pleaded guilty except Liddy and McCord, who were convicted at the end of January. The court was scheduled to reconvene on March 23 to hear sentences. In the interim the Senate voted 77–0 to establish a special investigating committee on abuses in the 1972 presidential campaign (the Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities) to be presided over by the universally respected conservative North Carolina Democrat Samuel J. Ervin, Jr. A strict constitutionalist, Ervin had been speaking out angrily on Nixon’s extraordinary extensions of presidential power, including the unprecedented presidential “impoundment” of funds authorized for expenditure by Congress and his continuation of the bombing of Cambodia even after a cease-fire had been agreed to in the Vietnam War . John Dean The former White House counsel testified in June 1973 before the Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities regardin the Watergate scandal. At the beginning of March, during Senate confirmation hearings of Nixon’s nominee to head the FBI , L. Patrick Gray, it was alleged that a little-known White House legal aide named John Wesley Dean III had been given personal access to the FBI’s Watergate investigation. This revelation was followed almost immediately by the president’s unprecedentedly sweeping refusal, under the claim of “ executive privilege ,” to allow aides such as Dean to testify before Congress. Ervin responded that if the president pressed the issue, he would issue arrest warrants to compel Nixon aides to testify. Meanwhile, Sirica controversially sought to leverage the hearings and continued grand jury proceedings to induce the defendants to speak more forthrightly about a broader conspiracy. He succeeded when defendant McCord passed him an extraordinary presentencing letter, in which he explained that the defendants had been pressured to plead guilty and perjure themselves about the involvement of higher-ups. On March 23 Sirica read the letter in open court. He then took the contentious step of passing exceptionally long “provisional” sentences on the defendants. However, Sirica made clear that were the defendants to speak frankly to the reconvened Watergate grand jury or the Senate hearings, he would reduce their sentences. Almost single-handedly, with great courage and risk to his reputation, Sirica had broken the case wide open. Revelations began cascading through the press: that Gray may have been involved in the cover-up; that the transnational conglomerate International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation (later ITT Corporation ), under investigation for corrupt financial ties to the White House, had sabotaged a democratic election in Chile ; and that Mitchell may have interfered in the major securities fraud case of a $250,000 donor to the Nixon campaign. In the middle of April—with Mitchell and other top aides facing indictment—the president nervously announced that his own investigations had determined that “no one in this Administration, presently employed, was involved in this very bizarre incident.” On April 17 presidential spokesman Ziegler infamously told the press that all previous White House statements about Watergate were now “inoperative.” Two weeks later, on April 30, 1973, Nixon gave a major televised address announcing the resignations of Dean; his two closest aides by far, Haldeman and John D. Ehrlichman ; and Attorney General Richard Kleindienst. Nixon protested his own innocence and promised cooperation with future investigations (even while including legalistic language that implied strong limits to that cooperation). The Ervin hearings By the time the Ervin hearings began on May 17, a new tenor for American political life had been set: eye-popping revelations of nearly undreamed-of venality at the heart of American power, followed by increasingly threadbare Oval Office protestations of innocence. It would not let up for the next 15 months. The daily televised hearings were quite possibly comparable in drama, import, and historic depth to the Constitutional Convention of 1787, the Lincoln-Douglas debates of 1858, and the Paris Peace Conference of 1919–20. Presided over by four Democrats led by Chairman Ervin—who became a folk hero (and to some a folk villain)—and three Republicans led by Vice Chairman Howard Baker of Tennessee, the hearings were at first covered gavel-to-gavel on all three commercial television networks—a business sacrifice that spoke to the remarkable civic high-mindedness with which the country approached the Watergate inquiry . Soon the networks began showing the hearings on a rotating basis. Some Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) stations, however, continued to broadcast the hearings live daily, other PBS stations reran telecasts of the hearings at night, while still others did both. Trading volume shot down on the New York Stock Exchange . Housewives threatened not to do a stitch of housework for as long as the hearings lasted. College students gathered around TV sets in corridors between, and sometimes during, classes; high schools set up TVs in the cafeteria for all-day civics lessons. “Never have I enjoyed watching television more than in the last two weeks,” one Washington Post letter writer testified, “with the spectacle of high human drama interwoven with the finest possible example of the democratic process at work unfolding before my eyes for hours on end, with no rehearsal, no canned laughter, very little commentary (none needed!), and, best of all, almost no commercial interruption!” The feeling was not universal. Sticklers, including independent prosecutor Archibald Cox, decried the unfairness of what he characterized as trying the principals in the media. Game-show and soap-opera fans complained about the preemption of their favourite programs. Most significantly for the later ideological direction of the country, though hardly noticed by elites at the time, large portions of Americans derided the entire business as a political witch hunt (and would continue to so view it into the 21st century). Still, some 35 million or so Americans watched the Ervin hearings at one time or another. What did they see? Methodical portraiture of a White House riddled with unprecedented and extra-constitutional paranoia and corruption from the beginning, painted by a bipartisan panel backed by the awesomely thorough staff work of some of the best young legal minds in Washington (among them Hillary Rodham Clinton , who worked for the House Judiciary Committee during the impeachment hearings). In the spring of 1969, national security adviser Henry Kissinger had wiretapped his staffers. In 1970 the White House set up an illegal money-laundering operation to fund its favoured Senate candidates. In 1971, after the disillusioned military analyst Daniel Ellsberg leaked the Pentagon Papers , the White House seemed to institutionalize what some have characterized as a culture of illegality. One young staffer named Tom Charles Huston had earlier recommended a plan, approved and then withdrawn by the president, that called for dramatically expanded illegal domestic spying activities by the CIA , FBI, and other intelligence agencies. His specific plan was rejected, but a very similar operation—which Americans came to know as the “Plumbers,” so called because its original purpose was to ferret out leaks—was soon at work carrying out some of the same tasks. It was revealed that, as the 1972 campaign season rolled around, roving cells of saboteurs devised ways to weaken individual Democratic presidential campaigns while making it look like the campaigns were actually sabotaging each other. A parallel fascination of the hearings was the questioning of young Nixon aides who left senators incredulous with their explanations that “ends-justifies-the-means” morality had become semiofficial White House policy. Another continuing thread was the examination of illegal sources of the money that funded the various clandestine operations. The drama was further intensified by ongoing investigation of the White House’s attempts at stifling the panel’s investigation even as it was still under way. The malfeasances multiplied every week—dredged up not merely by the Ervin committee but by journalists, the Watergate grand jury, Watergate special prosecutor Cox, and any number of related inquiries, including the trial in Los Angeles of Ellsberg (“Watergate West”), which had ended just before the Ervin hearings began. The operative constitutional question tying the complexity together was framed with special eloquence by Vice Chairman Baker: “What did the president know and when did he know it?” Nothing, Nixon continuously maintained. That contention was thrown melodramatically into doubt by Dean on June 25, 1973, in a nearly seven-hour statement to the Ervin committee, watched by a huge portion of the American television audience, followed by five days of intense cross-examination. Dean’s account established the president as the prime mover behind the scandal and cover-up. However, these revelations were greeted with skepticism by many. It appeared that the entire extraordinary business would devolve into a stalemate, the president’s word against one of his aides—until, on July 16, Alexander P. Butterfield, formerly of the White House staff, disclosed that all conversations in the president’s offices had secretly been recorded on tape. Both Cox and the Ervin committee promptly subpoenaed the tapes of several key conversations. Nixon refused to provide them on the grounds of executive privilege and national security. When Judge Sirica ordered Nixon to turn over the tapes and that order was upheld by the U.S. Court of Appeals in October, Nixon offered instead to provide written summaries of the tapes in question in return for an agreement that no further presidential documents would be sought. Cox rejected the proposal, and on October 20 the president ordered Attorney General Elliot Richardson to fire the special prosecutor. In an event that became known as the “ Saturday Night Massacre ,” both Richardson and William D. Ruckelshaus , the deputy attorney general , resigned rather than carry out the order, and Cox was finally dismissed by a compliant solicitor general, Robert Bork . It was another extraordinary historical moment. Many responsible American officials literally feared a White House coup d’état . A storm of public protest pressured Nixon into finally agreeing on October 23 to release the nine tapes asked for by Sirica, but, of the nine tapes specified in Sirica’s order, only seven were actually delivered, and one of the seven contained a gap of 18 and a half minutes that, according to a later report by a panel of experts, could not have been made accidentally. The combined weight of all the allegations that had been made during the course of the investigation of the scandal led to the initiation of a formal impeachment inquiry by the House Judiciary Committee in May 1974. On May 20 Judge Sirica ordered Nixon to turn over additional tapes to Cox’s successor as special prosecutor, Leon Jaworski . On July 24 the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that Nixon must provide the recordings. Between July 27 and 30 the House Judiciary Committee passed three articles of impeachment. On August 5 the president supplied transcripts of three tapes that clearly implicated him in the cover-up. With these revelations, Nixon’s last support in Congress evaporated. He announced his resignation on August 8, stating that he no longer had “a strong enough political base” with which to govern. Nixon left office at noon the following day, August 9.
Markdown	[![Encyclopedia Britannica](https://cdn.britannica.com/mendel/eb-logo/MendelNewThistleLogo.png)](https://www.britannica.com/) [![Encyclopedia Britannica](https://cdn.britannica.com/mendel/eb-logo/MendelNewThistleLogo.png)](https://www.britannica.com/) [SUBSCRIBE](https://premium.britannica.com/premium-membership/?utm_source=premium&utm_medium=global-nav&utm_campaign=blue-evergreen) [SUBSCRIBE](https://premium.britannica.com/premium-membership/?utm_source=premium&utm_medium=global-nav-mobile&utm_campaign=blue-evergreen) Login https://premium.britannica.com/premium-membership/?utm\_source=premium\&utm\_medium=nav-login-box\&utm\_campaign=evergreen [SUBSCRIBE](https://premium.britannica.com/premium-membership/?utm_source=premium&utm_medium=hamburger-menu&utm_campaign=blue) [Ask the Chatbot](https://www.britannica.com/chatbot) [Games & Quizzes](https://www.britannica.com/quiz/browse) [History & Society](https://www.britannica.com/History-Society) [Science & Tech](https://www.britannica.com/Science-Tech) [Biographies](https://www.britannica.com/Biographies) [Animals & Nature](https://www.britannica.com/Animals-Nature) [Geography & Travel](https://www.britannica.com/Geography-Travel) [Arts & Culture](https://www.britannica.com/Arts-Culture) [ProCon](https://www.britannica.com/procon) [Money](https://www.britannica.com/money) [Videos](https://www.britannica.com/videos) [Watergate scandal](https://www.britannica.com/event/Watergate-Scandal) - [Introduction & Top Questions](https://www.britannica.com/event/Watergate-Scandal) - [Burglary, arrest, and limited immediate political effect](https://www.britannica.com/event/Watergate-Scandal#ref302381) - [Watergate trial and aftermath](https://www.britannica.com/event/Watergate-Scandal/Watergate-trial-and-aftermath) - [The Ervin hearings](https://www.britannica.com/event/Watergate-Scandal/Watergate-trial-and-aftermath#ref302383) - [Pardon and aftermath](https://www.britannica.com/event/Watergate-Scandal/Pardon-and-aftermath) [References & Edit History](https://www.britannica.com/event/Watergate-Scandal/additional-info) [Quick Facts & Related Topics](https://www.britannica.com/facts/Watergate-Scandal) [Images & Videos](https://www.britannica.com/event/Watergate-Scandal/images-videos) [![Watergate scandal](https://cdn.britannica.com/15/164715-004-8F848322/Pres-Charles-Wendell-Colson-Richard-M-Nixon.jpg)](https://cdn.britannica.com/15/164715-050-FC023F27/Pres-Charles-Wendell-Colson-Richard-M-Nixon.jpg) [![Watergate complex](https://cdn.britannica.com/40/103040-004-956ECE2D/complex-Washington-DC.jpg)](https://cdn.britannica.com/40/103040-050-A6E50377/complex-Washington-DC.jpg) [![Colson, Charles; Haldeman, H.R.](https://cdn.britannica.com/12/164712-004-012351DD/Charles-Colson-Haldeman-HR.jpg)](https://cdn.britannica.com/12/164712-050-B20C32ED/Charles-Colson-Haldeman-HR.jpg) [![Mark Felt](https://cdn.britannica.com/00/193100-004-FC31DCA3/Mark-Felt.jpg)](https://cdn.britannica.com/00/193100-050-62FBA99B/Mark-Felt.jpg) [![John Dean](https://cdn.britannica.com/16/164716-004-B789B897/John-Dean.jpg)](https://cdn.britannica.com/16/164716-050-B2927A3E/John-Dean.jpg) [![See U.S. president Richard M. Nixon speaking about the Watergate scandal](https://cdn.britannica.com/97/23197-138-21E576D3/Richard-M-Nixon-release-tapes-November-17-1973.jpg?w=400&h=225&c=crop)](https://www.britannica.com/video/Richard-M-Nixon-release-tapes-November-17-1973/-13236) [![Richard Nixon: farewell speech](https://cdn.britannica.com/62/164762-004-80E39888/Richard-Nixon-Tricia-Cox-cabinet-farewell-staff-August-9-1974.jpg)](https://cdn.britannica.com/62/164762-050-068E5A98/Richard-Nixon-Tricia-Cox-cabinet-farewell-staff-August-9-1974.jpg) [![Gerald Ford](https://cdn.britannica.com/34/164734-004-3A1C7DEA/president-Gerald-R-Ford-August-9-1974.jpg)](https://cdn.britannica.com/34/164734-050-0B303BC9/president-Gerald-R-Ford-August-9-1974.jpg) At a Glance [![Watergate scandal](https://cdn.britannica.com/15/164715-050-FC023F27/Pres-Charles-Wendell-Colson-Richard-M-Nixon.jpg?w=200&h=200&c=crop)](https://www.britannica.com/summary/Watergate-Scandal) [Watergate scandal summary](https://www.britannica.com/summary/Watergate-Scandal) Quizzes [![Graphic artwork represents music of the seventies - (source file includes the fifties, sixties, eighties, and nineties, 50s, 60s, 70, 80s, 90s, decades)](https://cdn.britannica.com/12/255012-131-F43B16A9/artwork-70s-music.jpg?w=200&h=200&c=crop)](https://www.britannica.com/quiz/that-groovy-70s-quiz) [That Groovy ’70s Quiz](https://www.britannica.com/quiz/that-groovy-70s-quiz) Related Questions - [What was the Watergate scandal?](https://www.britannica.com/question/What-was-the-Watergate-scandal) - [Who were the five burglars at the DNC office in the Watergate office complex?](https://www.britannica.com/question/Who-were-the-five-burglars-at-the-DNC-office-in-the-Watergate-office-complex) - [What is the Kennedy Center?](https://www.britannica.com/question/What-is-the-Kennedy-Center) - [Is the Kennedy Center closed?](https://www.britannica.com/question/Is-the-Kennedy-Center-closed) - [Why did Donald Trump take over the Kennedy Center?](https://www.britannica.com/question/Why-did-Donald-Trump-take-over-the-Kennedy-Center) ![Britannica AI Icon](https://cdn.britannica.com/mendel-resources/3-179/images/chatbot/star-ai.svg?v=3.179.9) Contents Ask Anything [Politics, Law & Government](https://www.britannica.com/browse/Politics-Law-Government) [Law, Crime & Punishment](https://www.britannica.com/browse/Law-Crime-Punishment) CITE Share Feedback External Websites # Watergate trial and aftermath in # [Watergate scandal](https://www.britannica.com/event/Watergate-Scandal) Homework Help Written by [Rick Perlstein Historian and journalist. Author of Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America and others.](https://www.britannica.com/contributor/Rick-Perlstein/9057786) Rick Perlstein Fact-checked by [Britannica Editors Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree....](https://www.britannica.com/editor/The-Editors-of-Encyclopaedia-Britannica/4419) Britannica Editors Last updated Mar. 24, 2026 •[History](https://www.britannica.com/event/Watergate-Scandal/additional-info#history) ![Britannica AI Icon](https://cdn.britannica.com/mendel-resources/3-179/images/chatbot/star-ai.svg?v=3.179.9) Britannica AI Ask Anything Table of Contents Table of Contents Ask Anything The trial of the five arrested burglars and two accomplices began in federal court less than two weeks before Nixon’s second-term inauguration. The relatively narrow indictment on charges of [burglary](https://www.britannica.com/topic/burglary), [conspiracy](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conspiracy), and violation of federal wiretapping laws itself spoke to the success of the [White House](https://www.britannica.com/topic/White-House-Washington-DC) in containing the scandal. The presiding judge, [John J. Sirica](https://www.britannica.com/biography/John-Sirica), however, kept badgering defendants and witnesses on matters not covered in the indictment—namely, the financial and institutional involvement of the White House and reelection campaign. ## News • [Bob Woodward to 'lift the lid' on decades of reporting in new memoir 'Secrets'](https://www.britannica.com/news/637431/82db1394bb04fd7ce361bdfdba62c563) • Mar. 24, 2026, 6:00 AM ET (AP) Show less All the defendants pleaded guilty except Liddy and McCord, who were convicted at the end of January. The court was scheduled to reconvene on March 23 to hear sentences. In the [interim](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/interim) the Senate voted 77–0 to establish a special investigating committee on abuses in the 1972 presidential campaign (the Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities) to be presided over by the universally respected [conservative](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conservative) [North Carolina](https://www.britannica.com/place/North-Carolina-state) Democrat [Samuel J. Ervin, Jr.](https://www.britannica.com/biography/Samuel-J-Ervin-Jr) A strict constitutionalist, Ervin had been speaking out angrily on Nixon’s extraordinary extensions of presidential power, including the unprecedented presidential “impoundment” of funds authorized for expenditure by Congress and his continuation of the bombing of Cambodia even after a cease-fire had been agreed to in the [Vietnam War](https://www.britannica.com/event/Vietnam-War). [![John Dean](https://cdn.britannica.com/16/164716-050-B2927A3E/John-Dean.jpg?w=300)](https://cdn.britannica.com/16/164716-050-B2927A3E/John-Dean.jpg) [John Dean](https://cdn.britannica.com/16/164716-050-B2927A3E/John-Dean.jpg)The former White House counsel testified in June 1973 before the Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities regardin the Watergate scandal. (more) At the beginning of March, during Senate confirmation hearings of Nixon’s nominee to head the [FBI](https://www.britannica.com/topic/Federal-Bureau-of-Investigation), L. Patrick Gray, it was [alleged](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/alleged) that a little-known White House legal aide named [John Wesley Dean III](https://www.britannica.com/biography/John-Wesley-Dean-III) had been given personal access to the FBI’s Watergate investigation. This revelation was followed almost immediately by the president’s unprecedentedly sweeping refusal, under the claim of “[executive privilege](https://www.britannica.com/topic/executive-privilege),” to allow aides such as Dean to testify before Congress. Ervin responded that if the president pressed the issue, he would issue arrest warrants to compel Nixon aides to testify. Meanwhile, Sirica controversially sought to leverage the hearings and continued [grand jury](https://www.britannica.com/topic/grand-jury) proceedings to induce the defendants to speak more forthrightly about a broader conspiracy. He succeeded when defendant McCord passed him an extraordinary presentencing letter, in which he explained that the defendants had been pressured to plead guilty and perjure themselves about the involvement of higher-ups. On March 23 Sirica read the letter in open court. He then took the [contentious](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/contentious) step of passing exceptionally long “provisional” sentences on the defendants. However, Sirica made clear that were the defendants to speak frankly to the reconvened Watergate grand jury or the Senate hearings, he would reduce their sentences. Almost single-handedly, with great courage and risk to his reputation, Sirica had broken the case wide open. [Revelations](https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/Revelations) began cascading through the press: that Gray may have been involved in the cover-up; that the transnational conglomerate International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation (later [ITT Corporation](https://www.britannica.com/money/ITT-Corporation)), under investigation for corrupt financial ties to the White House, had sabotaged a democratic election in [Chile](https://www.britannica.com/place/Chile); and that Mitchell may have interfered in the major securities fraud case of a \$250,000 donor to the Nixon campaign. In the middle of April—with Mitchell and other top aides facing indictment—the president nervously announced that his own investigations had determined that “no one in this Administration, presently employed, was involved in this very bizarre incident.” On April 17 presidential spokesman Ziegler infamously told the press that all previous White House statements about Watergate were now “inoperative.” Two weeks later, on April 30, 1973, Nixon gave a major televised address announcing the resignations of Dean; his two closest aides by far, Haldeman and [John D. Ehrlichman](https://www.britannica.com/biography/John-D-Ehrlichman); and Attorney General Richard Kleindienst. Nixon protested his own innocence and promised cooperation with future investigations (even while including legalistic language that implied strong limits to that cooperation). ## The [Ervin hearings](https://www.britannica.com/biography/Samuel-J-Ervin-Jr) By the time the Ervin hearings began on May 17, a new [tenor](https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/tenor) for American political life had been set: eye-popping revelations of nearly undreamed-of venality at the heart of American power, followed by increasingly threadbare [Oval Office](https://www.britannica.com/topic/Oval-Office) protestations of innocence. It would not let up for the next 15 months. The daily televised hearings were quite possibly comparable in drama, import, and historic depth to the [Constitutional Convention](https://www.britannica.com/event/Constitutional-Convention) of 1787, the [Lincoln-Douglas debates](https://www.britannica.com/event/Lincoln-Douglas-debates) of 1858, and the [Paris Peace Conference](https://www.britannica.com/event/Paris-Peace-Conference) of 1919–20. Presided over by four Democrats led by Chairman Ervin—who became a folk hero (and to some a folk villain)—and three Republicans led by Vice Chairman Howard Baker of Tennessee, the hearings were at first covered gavel-to-gavel on all three commercial television networks—a business sacrifice that spoke to the remarkable civic high-mindedness with which the country approached the Watergate [inquiry](https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/inquiry). Soon the networks began showing the hearings on a rotating basis. Some [Public Broadcasting Service](https://www.britannica.com/topic/Public-Broadcasting-Service) (PBS) stations, however, continued to broadcast the hearings live daily, other PBS stations reran telecasts of the hearings at night, while still others did both. Trading volume shot down on the [New York Stock Exchange](https://www.britannica.com/money/New-York-Stock-Exchange). Housewives threatened not to do a stitch of housework for as long as the hearings lasted. College students gathered around TV sets in corridors between, and sometimes during, classes; high schools set up TVs in the cafeteria for all-day civics lessons. “Never have I enjoyed watching television more than in the last two weeks,” one Washington Post letter writer testified, “with the [spectacle](https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/spectacle) of high human drama interwoven with the finest possible example of the democratic process at work unfolding before my eyes for hours on end, with no rehearsal, no canned laughter, very little commentary (none needed!), and, best of all, almost no commercial interruption!” The feeling was not universal. Sticklers, including independent prosecutor Archibald Cox, decried the unfairness of what he characterized as trying the principals in the media. Game-show and soap-opera fans complained about the preemption of their favourite programs. Most significantly for the later ideological direction of the country, though hardly noticed by elites at the time, large portions of Americans derided the entire business as a political [witch hunt](https://www.britannica.com/topic/witch-hunt) (and would continue to so view it into the 21st century). Still, some 35 million or so Americans watched the Ervin hearings at one time or another. What did they see? Methodical portraiture of a White House riddled with unprecedented and extra-constitutional paranoia and corruption from the beginning, painted by a bipartisan panel backed by the awesomely thorough staff work of some of the best young legal minds in Washington (among them [Hillary Rodham Clinton](https://www.britannica.com/biography/Hillary-Clinton), who worked for the House Judiciary Committee during the impeachment hearings). In the spring of 1969, national security adviser [Henry Kissinger](https://www.britannica.com/biography/Henry-Kissinger) had wiretapped his staffers. In 1970 the White House set up an illegal money-laundering operation to fund its favoured Senate candidates. In 1971, after the disillusioned military analyst [Daniel Ellsberg](https://www.britannica.com/biography/Daniel-Ellsberg) leaked the [Pentagon Papers](https://www.britannica.com/topic/Pentagon-Papers), the White House seemed to institutionalize what some have characterized as a [culture](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/culture) of illegality. One young staffer named Tom Charles Huston had earlier recommended a plan, approved and then withdrawn by the president, that called for dramatically expanded illegal domestic spying activities by the [CIA](https://www.britannica.com/topic/Central-Intelligence-Agency), FBI, and other intelligence agencies. His specific plan was rejected, but a very similar operation—which Americans came to know as the “Plumbers,” so called because its original purpose was to ferret out leaks—was soon at work carrying out some of the same tasks. It was revealed that, as the 1972 campaign season rolled around, roving cells of saboteurs devised ways to weaken individual Democratic presidential campaigns while making it look like the campaigns were actually sabotaging each other. A parallel fascination of the hearings was the questioning of young Nixon aides who left senators [incredulous](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/incredulous) with their explanations that “ends-justifies-the-means” [morality](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/morality) had become semiofficial White House policy. Another continuing thread was the examination of illegal sources of the money that funded the various [clandestine](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/clandestine) operations. The drama was further intensified by ongoing investigation of the White House’s attempts at stifling the panel’s investigation even as it was still under way. The [malfeasances](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/malfeasances) multiplied every week—dredged up not merely by the Ervin committee but by journalists, the Watergate grand jury, Watergate [special prosecutor](https://www.britannica.com/topic/independent-counsel) Cox, and any number of related inquiries, including the trial in Los Angeles of Ellsberg (“Watergate West”), which had ended just before the Ervin hearings began. The operative [constitutional](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/constitutional) question tying the complexity together was framed with special eloquence by Vice Chairman Baker: “What did the president know and when did he know it?” Nothing, Nixon continuously maintained. That [contention](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/contention) was thrown melodramatically into doubt by Dean on June 25, 1973, in a nearly seven-hour statement to the Ervin committee, watched by a huge portion of the American television audience, followed by five days of intense cross-examination. Dean’s account established the president as the prime mover behind the scandal and cover-up. However, these revelations were greeted with [skepticism](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/skepticism) by many. It appeared that the entire extraordinary business would devolve into a stalemate, the president’s word against one of his aides—until, on July 16, Alexander P. Butterfield, formerly of the White House staff, disclosed that all conversations in the president’s offices had secretly been recorded on tape. Both Cox and the Ervin committee promptly subpoenaed the tapes of several key conversations. Nixon refused to provide them on the grounds of executive privilege and national security. When Judge Sirica ordered Nixon to turn over the tapes and that order was upheld by the U.S. Court of Appeals in October, Nixon offered instead to provide written summaries of the tapes in question in return for an agreement that no further presidential documents would be sought. Cox rejected the proposal, and on October 20 the president ordered Attorney General Elliot Richardson to fire the special prosecutor. In an event that became known as the “[Saturday Night Massacre](https://www.britannica.com/topic/Saturday-Night-Massacre),” both Richardson and [William D. Ruckelshaus](https://www.britannica.com/biography/William-D-Ruckelshaus), the deputy [attorney general](https://www.britannica.com/topic/attorney-general), resigned rather than carry out the order, and Cox was finally dismissed by a [compliant](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/compliant) solicitor general, [Robert Bork](https://www.britannica.com/biography/Robert-H-Bork). It was another extraordinary historical moment. Many responsible American officials literally feared a White House [coup d’état](https://www.britannica.com/topic/coup-detat). [![See U.S. president Richard M. Nixon speaking about the Watergate scandal](https://cdn.britannica.com/97/23197-138-21E576D3/Richard-M-Nixon-release-tapes-November-17-1973.jpg?w=800&h=450&c=crop)1 of 2](https://www.britannica.com/video/Richard-M-Nixon-release-tapes-November-17-1973/-13236) See U.S. president Richard M. Nixon speaking about the Watergate scandalU.S. Pres. Richard M. Nixon speaking about the release of the Watergate tapes (“I am not a crook”), November 17, 1973. (more) [See all videos for this article](https://www.britannica.com/event/Watergate-Scandal/images-videos) [![Richard Nixon: farewell speech](https://cdn.britannica.com/62/164762-050-068E5A98/Richard-Nixon-Tricia-Cox-cabinet-farewell-staff-August-9-1974.jpg?w=300)2 of 2](https://cdn.britannica.com/62/164762-050-068E5A98/Richard-Nixon-Tricia-Cox-cabinet-farewell-staff-August-9-1974.jpg) [Richard Nixon: farewell speech](https://cdn.britannica.com/62/164762-050-068E5A98/Richard-Nixon-Tricia-Cox-cabinet-farewell-staff-August-9-1974.jpg)U.S. Pres. Richard Nixon, with his daughter Tricia Cox looking on, bidding farewell to his cabinet and White House staff shortly before his resignation took effect, August 9, 1974. (more) [Richard M. Nixon resignation announcement](https://cdn.britannica.com/78/70178-005-E7133FA1/Richard-M-Nixon-resignation-presidency-August-8-1974.mp3)U.S. Pres. Richard M. Nixon announcing his resignation from the presidency, August 8, 1974. (more) A storm of public protest pressured Nixon into finally agreeing on October 23 to release the nine tapes asked for by Sirica, but, of the nine tapes specified in Sirica’s order, only seven were actually delivered, and one of the seven contained a gap of 18 and a half minutes that, according to a later report by a panel of experts, could not have been made accidentally. The [combined](https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/combined) weight of all the allegations that had been made during the course of the investigation of the scandal led to the initiation of a formal impeachment inquiry by the House Judiciary Committee in May 1974. On May 20 Judge Sirica ordered Nixon to turn over additional tapes to Cox’s successor as special prosecutor, [Leon Jaworski](https://www.britannica.com/biography/Leon-Jaworski). On July 24 the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that Nixon must provide the recordings. Between July 27 and 30 the House Judiciary Committee passed three articles of impeachment. On August 5 the president supplied transcripts of three tapes that clearly implicated him in the cover-up. With these revelations, Nixon’s last support in Congress evaporated. He announced his resignation on August 8, stating that he no longer had “a strong enough political base” with which to govern. Nixon left office at noon the following day, August 9. ![Britannica AI Icon](https://cdn.britannica.com/mendel-resources/3-179/images/chatbot/star-ai.svg?v=3.179.9)Britannica AI chevron\_right Watergate scandal - Political Corruption, Nixon Resignation, Cover-up close [AI-generated answers](https://www.britannica.com/about-britannica-ai) from Britannica articles. AI makes mistakes, so verify using Britannica articles. # Pardon and aftermath [![Gerald Ford](https://cdn.britannica.com/34/164734-050-0B303BC9/president-Gerald-R-Ford-August-9-1974.jpg?w=300)](https://cdn.britannica.com/34/164734-050-0B303BC9/president-Gerald-R-Ford-August-9-1974.jpg) [Gerald Ford](https://cdn.britannica.com/34/164734-050-0B303BC9/president-Gerald-R-Ford-August-9-1974.jpg)Gerald Ford being sworn in as U.S. president, August 9, 1974. (more) On September 8, 1974, the new president, [Gerald Ford](https://www.britannica.com/biography/Gerald-Ford), chose to grant Nixon a full and [unconditional](https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/unconditional) [pardon](https://www.britannica.com/topic/pardon) for any crimes he may have committed while president. Ford had become vice president in December 1973, after Nixon’s previous vice president, [Spiro T. Agnew](https://www.britannica.com/biography/Spiro-Agnew), resigned amid accusations of financial improprieties and pled no contest to a single, negotiated criminal charge. By the time of the pardon, enough Americans had become convinced that Nixon (named by the Watergate [grand jury](https://www.britannica.com/topic/grand-jury) as an “un-indicted co-conspirator”) was guilty of crimes and that Ford had pardoned him as [quid pro quo](https://www.britannica.com/topic/quid-pro-quo) for becoming president that the approval rating of the otherwise popular new president collapsed overnight. This loss of faith in the new chief executive spoke to the extraordinary [cynicism](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cynicism) that marked the national mood 27 months into a scandal in which a clutch of Nixon’s closest aides eventually went to jail. For the rest of the decade both popular and [political culture](https://www.britannica.com/topic/political-culture) were suffused with paranoia and disillusionment. [Ronald Reagan](https://www.britannica.com/biography/Ronald-Reagan)’s ascent to the presidency in 1980 had very much to do with his [rhetorical](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rhetorical) ability to break the cloud of gloom that Watergate, along with the U.S. failure in the [Vietnam War](https://www.britannica.com/event/Vietnam-War), had cast upon the country. Even in the early 21st century the [legacy](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/legacy) of Watergate continued to haunt American politics. Watergate was so synonymous with scandal that it became common practice for the press to tack on a \-gate to the scandal du jour, from “Tailhook-Gate” to “Troopergate.” The former president and then, after his death, his family spent a great deal of money on a legal campaign to prevent the entirety of his tapes from being released. That effort failed, and the entire taped record of the Nixon [White House](https://www.britannica.com/topic/White-House-Washington-DC) eventually became available to the public. Scholars continue to mine the tapes for insights, including the discovery that Nixon ordered the firebombing of the Washington, [D.C.](https://www.britannica.com/place/Washington-DC), [think tank](https://www.britannica.com/topic/think-tank) the [Brookings Institution](https://www.britannica.com/topic/Brookings-Institution) (never carried out) in an attempt to remove records suggesting that he had conspired to [sabotage](https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/sabotage) the 1968 Paris peace talks so that his Democratic opponent in that year’s presidential election, Vice Pres. [Hubert Humphrey](https://www.britannica.com/biography/Hubert-Humphrey), could not run on a record of having helped end the Vietnam War. [Rick Perlstein](https://www.britannica.com/contributor/Rick-Perlstein/9057786) Load Next Page Feedback Thank you for your feedback Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article. print Print Please select which sections you would like to print: verifiedCite While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions. Select Citation Style Perlstein, Rick. "Watergate scandal". Encyclopedia Britannica, 24 Mar. 2026, https://www.britannica.com/event/Watergate-Scandal. Accessed 15 April 2026. Copy Citation Share Share to social media [Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/BRITANNICA/) [X](https://x.com/britannica) URL <https://www.britannica.com/event/Watergate-Scandal> External Websites - [Teach Democracy - The Watergate Scandal](https://teachdemocracy.org/online-lesson/the-watergate-scandal/) - [Gerald R. Ford Ford Library and Museum - The Watergate Files](https://www.fordlibrarymuseum.gov/exhibits/watergate-files#event-number-1149) - [Florida State College at Jacksonville Pressbooks - U.S. History II: 1877 to Present - Watergate and Jimmy Carter](https://fscj.pressbooks.pub/modernushistory/chapter/watergate-and-jimmy-carter/) - [History Today - What was the Legacy of the Watergate Scandal?](https://www.historytoday.com/archive/head-head/what-was-legacy-watergate-scandal) - [Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia - Miller Center - The Watergate story](https://millercenter.org/the-presidency/educational-resources/watergate) - [Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library and Museum - The Watergate Files](https://www.fordlibrarymuseum.gov/exhibits/watergate-files#event-number-1154) - [Nixon Library Foundation - Watergate Explained](https://www.nixonfoundation.org/watergate-explained/) - [Digital History - Watergate](https://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/disp_textbook.cfm?smtID=2&psid=3352) Britannica Websites Articles from Britannica Encyclopedias for elementary and high school students. - [Watergate scandal - Student Encyclopedia (Ages 11 and up)](https://kids.britannica.com/students/article/Watergate-scandal/599601)
Readable Markdown	The trial of the five arrested burglars and two accomplices began in federal court less than two weeks before Nixon’s second-term inauguration. The relatively narrow indictment on charges of [burglary](https://www.britannica.com/topic/burglary), [conspiracy](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conspiracy), and violation of federal wiretapping laws itself spoke to the success of the [White House](https://www.britannica.com/topic/White-House-Washington-DC) in containing the scandal. The presiding judge, [John J. Sirica](https://www.britannica.com/biography/John-Sirica), however, kept badgering defendants and witnesses on matters not covered in the indictment—namely, the financial and institutional involvement of the White House and reelection campaign. ## News • All the defendants pleaded guilty except Liddy and McCord, who were convicted at the end of January. The court was scheduled to reconvene on March 23 to hear sentences. In the [interim](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/interim) the Senate voted 77–0 to establish a special investigating committee on abuses in the 1972 presidential campaign (the Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities) to be presided over by the universally respected [conservative](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conservative) [North Carolina](https://www.britannica.com/place/North-Carolina-state) Democrat [Samuel J. Ervin, Jr.](https://www.britannica.com/biography/Samuel-J-Ervin-Jr) A strict constitutionalist, Ervin had been speaking out angrily on Nixon’s extraordinary extensions of presidential power, including the unprecedented presidential “impoundment” of funds authorized for expenditure by Congress and his continuation of the bombing of Cambodia even after a cease-fire had been agreed to in the [Vietnam War](https://www.britannica.com/event/Vietnam-War). [John Dean](https://cdn.britannica.com/16/164716-050-B2927A3E/John-Dean.jpg)The former White House counsel testified in June 1973 before the Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities regardin the Watergate scandal. At the beginning of March, during Senate confirmation hearings of Nixon’s nominee to head the [FBI](https://www.britannica.com/topic/Federal-Bureau-of-Investigation), L. Patrick Gray, it was [alleged](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/alleged) that a little-known White House legal aide named [John Wesley Dean III](https://www.britannica.com/biography/John-Wesley-Dean-III) had been given personal access to the FBI’s Watergate investigation. This revelation was followed almost immediately by the president’s unprecedentedly sweeping refusal, under the claim of “[executive privilege](https://www.britannica.com/topic/executive-privilege),” to allow aides such as Dean to testify before Congress. Ervin responded that if the president pressed the issue, he would issue arrest warrants to compel Nixon aides to testify. Meanwhile, Sirica controversially sought to leverage the hearings and continued [grand jury](https://www.britannica.com/topic/grand-jury) proceedings to induce the defendants to speak more forthrightly about a broader conspiracy. He succeeded when defendant McCord passed him an extraordinary presentencing letter, in which he explained that the defendants had been pressured to plead guilty and perjure themselves about the involvement of higher-ups. On March 23 Sirica read the letter in open court. He then took the [contentious](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/contentious) step of passing exceptionally long “provisional” sentences on the defendants. However, Sirica made clear that were the defendants to speak frankly to the reconvened Watergate grand jury or the Senate hearings, he would reduce their sentences. Almost single-handedly, with great courage and risk to his reputation, Sirica had broken the case wide open. [Revelations](https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/Revelations) began cascading through the press: that Gray may have been involved in the cover-up; that the transnational conglomerate International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation (later [ITT Corporation](https://www.britannica.com/money/ITT-Corporation)), under investigation for corrupt financial ties to the White House, had sabotaged a democratic election in [Chile](https://www.britannica.com/place/Chile); and that Mitchell may have interfered in the major securities fraud case of a \$250,000 donor to the Nixon campaign. In the middle of April—with Mitchell and other top aides facing indictment—the president nervously announced that his own investigations had determined that “no one in this Administration, presently employed, was involved in this very bizarre incident.” On April 17 presidential spokesman Ziegler infamously told the press that all previous White House statements about Watergate were now “inoperative.” Two weeks later, on April 30, 1973, Nixon gave a major televised address announcing the resignations of Dean; his two closest aides by far, Haldeman and [John D. Ehrlichman](https://www.britannica.com/biography/John-D-Ehrlichman); and Attorney General Richard Kleindienst. Nixon protested his own innocence and promised cooperation with future investigations (even while including legalistic language that implied strong limits to that cooperation). ## The [Ervin hearings](https://www.britannica.com/biography/Samuel-J-Ervin-Jr) By the time the Ervin hearings began on May 17, a new [tenor](https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/tenor) for American political life had been set: eye-popping revelations of nearly undreamed-of venality at the heart of American power, followed by increasingly threadbare [Oval Office](https://www.britannica.com/topic/Oval-Office) protestations of innocence. It would not let up for the next 15 months. The daily televised hearings were quite possibly comparable in drama, import, and historic depth to the [Constitutional Convention](https://www.britannica.com/event/Constitutional-Convention) of 1787, the [Lincoln-Douglas debates](https://www.britannica.com/event/Lincoln-Douglas-debates) of 1858, and the [Paris Peace Conference](https://www.britannica.com/event/Paris-Peace-Conference) of 1919–20. Presided over by four Democrats led by Chairman Ervin—who became a folk hero (and to some a folk villain)—and three Republicans led by Vice Chairman Howard Baker of Tennessee, the hearings were at first covered gavel-to-gavel on all three commercial television networks—a business sacrifice that spoke to the remarkable civic high-mindedness with which the country approached the Watergate [inquiry](https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/inquiry). Soon the networks began showing the hearings on a rotating basis. Some [Public Broadcasting Service](https://www.britannica.com/topic/Public-Broadcasting-Service) (PBS) stations, however, continued to broadcast the hearings live daily, other PBS stations reran telecasts of the hearings at night, while still others did both. Trading volume shot down on the [New York Stock Exchange](https://www.britannica.com/money/New-York-Stock-Exchange). Housewives threatened not to do a stitch of housework for as long as the hearings lasted. College students gathered around TV sets in corridors between, and sometimes during, classes; high schools set up TVs in the cafeteria for all-day civics lessons. “Never have I enjoyed watching television more than in the last two weeks,” one Washington Post letter writer testified, “with the [spectacle](https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/spectacle) of high human drama interwoven with the finest possible example of the democratic process at work unfolding before my eyes for hours on end, with no rehearsal, no canned laughter, very little commentary (none needed!), and, best of all, almost no commercial interruption!” The feeling was not universal. Sticklers, including independent prosecutor Archibald Cox, decried the unfairness of what he characterized as trying the principals in the media. Game-show and soap-opera fans complained about the preemption of their favourite programs. Most significantly for the later ideological direction of the country, though hardly noticed by elites at the time, large portions of Americans derided the entire business as a political [witch hunt](https://www.britannica.com/topic/witch-hunt) (and would continue to so view it into the 21st century). Still, some 35 million or so Americans watched the Ervin hearings at one time or another. What did they see? Methodical portraiture of a White House riddled with unprecedented and extra-constitutional paranoia and corruption from the beginning, painted by a bipartisan panel backed by the awesomely thorough staff work of some of the best young legal minds in Washington (among them [Hillary Rodham Clinton](https://www.britannica.com/biography/Hillary-Clinton), who worked for the House Judiciary Committee during the impeachment hearings). In the spring of 1969, national security adviser [Henry Kissinger](https://www.britannica.com/biography/Henry-Kissinger) had wiretapped his staffers. In 1970 the White House set up an illegal money-laundering operation to fund its favoured Senate candidates. In 1971, after the disillusioned military analyst [Daniel Ellsberg](https://www.britannica.com/biography/Daniel-Ellsberg) leaked the [Pentagon Papers](https://www.britannica.com/topic/Pentagon-Papers), the White House seemed to institutionalize what some have characterized as a [culture](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/culture) of illegality. One young staffer named Tom Charles Huston had earlier recommended a plan, approved and then withdrawn by the president, that called for dramatically expanded illegal domestic spying activities by the [CIA](https://www.britannica.com/topic/Central-Intelligence-Agency), FBI, and other intelligence agencies. His specific plan was rejected, but a very similar operation—which Americans came to know as the “Plumbers,” so called because its original purpose was to ferret out leaks—was soon at work carrying out some of the same tasks. It was revealed that, as the 1972 campaign season rolled around, roving cells of saboteurs devised ways to weaken individual Democratic presidential campaigns while making it look like the campaigns were actually sabotaging each other. A parallel fascination of the hearings was the questioning of young Nixon aides who left senators [incredulous](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/incredulous) with their explanations that “ends-justifies-the-means” [morality](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/morality) had become semiofficial White House policy. Another continuing thread was the examination of illegal sources of the money that funded the various [clandestine](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/clandestine) operations. The drama was further intensified by ongoing investigation of the White House’s attempts at stifling the panel’s investigation even as it was still under way. The [malfeasances](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/malfeasances) multiplied every week—dredged up not merely by the Ervin committee but by journalists, the Watergate grand jury, Watergate [special prosecutor](https://www.britannica.com/topic/independent-counsel) Cox, and any number of related inquiries, including the trial in Los Angeles of Ellsberg (“Watergate West”), which had ended just before the Ervin hearings began. The operative [constitutional](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/constitutional) question tying the complexity together was framed with special eloquence by Vice Chairman Baker: “What did the president know and when did he know it?” Nothing, Nixon continuously maintained. That [contention](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/contention) was thrown melodramatically into doubt by Dean on June 25, 1973, in a nearly seven-hour statement to the Ervin committee, watched by a huge portion of the American television audience, followed by five days of intense cross-examination. Dean’s account established the president as the prime mover behind the scandal and cover-up. However, these revelations were greeted with [skepticism](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/skepticism) by many. It appeared that the entire extraordinary business would devolve into a stalemate, the president’s word against one of his aides—until, on July 16, Alexander P. Butterfield, formerly of the White House staff, disclosed that all conversations in the president’s offices had secretly been recorded on tape. Both Cox and the Ervin committee promptly subpoenaed the tapes of several key conversations. Nixon refused to provide them on the grounds of executive privilege and national security. When Judge Sirica ordered Nixon to turn over the tapes and that order was upheld by the U.S. Court of Appeals in October, Nixon offered instead to provide written summaries of the tapes in question in return for an agreement that no further presidential documents would be sought. Cox rejected the proposal, and on October 20 the president ordered Attorney General Elliot Richardson to fire the special prosecutor. In an event that became known as the “[Saturday Night Massacre](https://www.britannica.com/topic/Saturday-Night-Massacre),” both Richardson and [William D. Ruckelshaus](https://www.britannica.com/biography/William-D-Ruckelshaus), the deputy [attorney general](https://www.britannica.com/topic/attorney-general), resigned rather than carry out the order, and Cox was finally dismissed by a [compliant](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/compliant) solicitor general, [Robert Bork](https://www.britannica.com/biography/Robert-H-Bork). It was another extraordinary historical moment. Many responsible American officials literally feared a White House [coup d’état](https://www.britannica.com/topic/coup-detat). A storm of public protest pressured Nixon into finally agreeing on October 23 to release the nine tapes asked for by Sirica, but, of the nine tapes specified in Sirica’s order, only seven were actually delivered, and one of the seven contained a gap of 18 and a half minutes that, according to a later report by a panel of experts, could not have been made accidentally. The [combined](https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/combined) weight of all the allegations that had been made during the course of the investigation of the scandal led to the initiation of a formal impeachment inquiry by the House Judiciary Committee in May 1974. On May 20 Judge Sirica ordered Nixon to turn over additional tapes to Cox’s successor as special prosecutor, [Leon Jaworski](https://www.britannica.com/biography/Leon-Jaworski). On July 24 the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that Nixon must provide the recordings. Between July 27 and 30 the House Judiciary Committee passed three articles of impeachment. On August 5 the president supplied transcripts of three tapes that clearly implicated him in the cover-up. With these revelations, Nixon’s last support in Congress evaporated. He announced his resignation on August 8, stating that he no longer had “a strong enough political base” with which to govern. Nixon left office at noon the following day, August 9.
Shard	62 (laksa)
Root Hash	5455945239613777662
Unparsed URL	com,britannica!www,/event/Watergate-Scandal/Watergate-trial-and-aftermath s443