🕷️ Crawler Inspector

URL Lookup

Direct Parameter Lookup

Raw Queries and Responses

1. Shard Calculation

Query:

Response:

Calculated Shard: 153 (from laksa122)

2. Crawled Status Check

Query:

curl -X POST \
  'http://laksa153.int.ahrefs:8124/' \
  -H 'Content-Type: text/plain' \
  -H 'X-ClickHouse-Database: crawler3' \
  -H 'Authorization: Basic YXBpOg==' \
  -d 'SELECT getAhrefsURLFromUnparsed(src_unparsed) AS found_url, ifNull(toUnixTimestamp(download_stamp), 0) AS crawl_time, ifNull(toUnixTimestamp(props_url_first_seen), 0) AS first_indexed_time, download_http_code AS http_code, src_unparsed AS src_unparsed, src_root_hash AS src_root_hash, history_drop_reason AS history_drop_reason, meta_title AS meta_title, meta_descriptions AS meta_descriptions, attrs_boilerpipe_text AS attrs_boilerpipe_text, attrs_markdown AS attrs_markdown, attrs_readable_markdown AS attrs_readable_markdown, meta_canonical AS meta_canonical FROM crawler3.page_info_local FINAL PREWHERE (src_root_hash, src_unparsed) IN ((getAhrefsRootHashFromUnparsed(getAhrefsUnparsedNoserviceFromURL(\'https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/\')), getAhrefsUnparsedNoserviceFromURL(\'https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/\'))) FORMAT JSONEachRow'

Response:

{"found_url":"https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/","crawl_time":1775606565,"first_indexed_time":1593539708,"http_code":200,"src_unparsed":"com,waterfilterguru!\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/ s443","src_root_hash":"8543287158922557553","history_drop_reason":null,"meta_title":"The 5 Best Water Filter Pitchers, According to Our Testing","meta_descriptions":["We tested 8 popular water filter pitchers and ranked them based on their contaminant reduction performance, design quality, certifications & more."],"attrs_boilerpipe_text":"The\nbest water filter pitchers\nare affordable, portable, and reduce dozens of contaminants using gravity-fed water filtration. \nWe use our own evidence-based testing to review and compare water filters. \nI’ve personally tested all the water filters on this list, leveraging my experience as a WQA Certified Water Specialist (CWS) and Certified Water Treatment Representative (CWR) to review each product as both an expert and a customer.\nOverall Score: 9.33\nCulligan ZeroWater\nBest contaminant reduction performance\nMost extensively certified\nBest value for money\nEasy to set up, no filter priming needed\nOverall Score: 8.90\nEpic Pure Pitcher\nSecond highest score for contaminant reduction\nBest value for money\nEasy to set up, no filter priming needed\nAffordable ongoing cost\nOverall Score: 8.78\nClearly Filtered Water Pitcher\nReduced the most contaminants in our lab tests\nHighest quality design materials\nCertified for performance & materials safety\nReduced 100% fluoride\nTable of Contents\nOur Testing & Selection Process\nThe 5 Best Water Filter Pitchers\nCulligan ZeroWater\nEpic Pure Pitcher\nClearly Filtered Pitcher\nSantevia MINA Pitcher\nLARQ Pure-Vis Advanced Pitcher\nFilters That Didn’t Make the Cut\nOur Testing & Selection Process\nHow We Test & Score\nWe use a metrics-driven process to test water filters for their performance. Our aim is to evaluate a system’s performance capabilities, value for money, and suitability for a specific situation or intended outcome.\nFor our Best Water Filter Pitchers guide, we cherry-picked the filters that obtained the highest scores across each of our scoring categories,\nwith a particular focus on contaminant reduction.\nWe scored these pitchers based on how effectively they reduced contaminants in our water, what we thought about their design quality, their ease of setup and maintenance, and more. We also compared filter materials and technologies, and evaluated third-party lab test results when the manufacturer provided them, though these are not scoring factors.\nTo ensure the fairest comparisons, we use fact-based, numerical data whenever we can. But some testing categories require us to conduct our own subjective assessment, giving our personal insight into a specific aspect of a product’s performance.\nYou can see our complete testing and scoring process here.\nHow We Choose the Winners\nTo choose the best water filter pitchers, we evaluated all the filters we’ve reviewed and compared their testing data side-by-side. \nWe selected the highest-scoring products, paying close attention to the filters that reduced the most contaminants in our water. \nThe water filter pitchers we’ve recommended each have their own unique filter technologies and produce different outcomes. We aimed to provide enough variety to offer targeted recommendations for specific budgets and situations. \nWe automatically excluded some products from this guide, including:\n1. Countertop dispensers, units that require electricity to operate, and systems that can’t be classed as gravity-fed water filter pitchers. \n2. Filters with availability\/stock issues, or those not available in the USA.\n3. Systems that were unable to match up to their competitors due to poorer contaminant reduction performance, those sold by lesser-known or less trustworthy brands, or those offering poorer value on the whole.\nArticle Update History\n11\/07\/2025 – Added Culligan ZeroWater, removed Legacy ZeroWater\nCulligan ZeroWater\nThe Culligan ZeroWater Pitcher is the highest-scoring water filter pitcher we tested, earning an overall weighted score of 9.33. It removed more contaminants than any other water filter pitcher we tested and was\nthe only product to be certified for 100% of its contaminant reduction claims\n. It also has a sturdier, better-quality construction than most other pitchers (with the exception of Clearly Filtered),\nbut\nit did demineralize our water, and it has the highest maintenance cost of all the filters in this list. \nOverall Score: 9.33\nHow We Test & Score\n9.65\nContaminant Reduction\n9.40\nDesign\n8.00\nMaintenance\n9.50\nFiltration Rate\n9.50\nSetup\n7.60\nCompany\nBest For\nThe only pitcher to remove 100% of all metals, minerals, and inorganics\nHigher-quality design than most other pitchers\nIAPMO certified for 100% of contaminants claimed to reduce\nCertified for materials safety\nFast filtration\nProduct Specs\nPrice\n$24.99+\nContaminants Reduced\n25+\nCertifications or Testing\nNSF\/ANSI 42, 53, 401 & 372\nHolding Capacity\n7-40 cups\nFilter Lifespan\n20 gallons\nApprox. Annual Cost\n$160+\nDiscount:\nGet 10% off – Click Here for Code\nOur Lab Tests\nIn our Tap Score testing, the\nCulligan ZeroWater Pitcher\noutperformed all the other water filter pitchers we reviewed, removing 100% of all contaminants with health effects in our water\n, including uranium and fluoride, both initially detected in concentrations exceeding the HGL. It also eliminated sulfate, chlorine, nitrate, zinc, copper, strontium, barium, and molybdenum.\nZeroWater filters use a dual ion exchange process, which greatly reduces or removes\nall\ncharged ions.\nAs a result, we also saw reductions or eliminations of carbonate, calcium, magnesium, bicarbonate, sodium, and hardness. The pH of our water was reduced from 7.6 (slightly alkaline) to 6.6 (slightly acidic), leading to a lower aesthetics score of 8.00. Since a big part of the filter’s marketing is its ability to reduce TDS down to 0, there’s no included remineralization media to mitigate these effects.\nOverall, though, the pitcher still earned the highest contaminant reduction score on this list (9.65), partly due to its exceptional health-related contaminant reduction and partly because it’s the only pitcher to have IAPMO certifications to\nNSF 42\n,\nNSF 53\n, and\nNSF 401\n, for every single contaminant that it’s claimed to reduce.\nOther Scoring Factors\nWhen we consider just how thoroughly the Culligan ZeroWater Pitcher filtered our water, its filtration rate of 1.9 GPH (gallons per hour) is pretty impressive. It’s not the fastest filter on this list – Epic Pure, Clearly Filtered, and the legacy ZeroWater were quicker – but it still\ntook just 7 minutes to filter a full pitcher of water, earning it a score of 9.50. \nWhere Culligan ZeroWater\ndid\ncome out on top was in the design category, with a high score of 9.40. Most of the other pitchers we tested had construction issues, with thin, flimsy-feeling plastic. The Culligan ZeroWater pitcher feels sturdy, and it’s\nIAPMO certified for materials safety and\nlead-free design\n. You can choose from several pitcher sizes and capacities, from the smallest 7-cup model to the largest 40-cup  glass dispenser.\nWe were able to get the pitcher set up and ready to use in less than 5 minutes,\nearning it a high setup score of 9.50. But it had the highest filter replacement cost of all the filters we tested for this review ($0.90, based on its 20-gallon capacity, as outlined in its certification listing), resulting in the lowest maintenance score of just 8.00.\nLooking at Culligan’s company policies, the\n90-day warranty is one of the lowest we’ve seen for a water filter pitcher\n, and you’ll have to pay for shipping unless you spend more than $99 on your order. The ambiguous returns policy (each return is treated “uniquely”) was also a letdown, contributing to its company score of 7.60.\nCriteria\nResults\nOverall Score\n9.33\nHealth Related Contaminants\n9.70\nAesthetic Related Contaminants\n8.00\nPerformance Certification\nNSF\/ANSI 42, 53, 401\nFiltration Rate\n1.9 GPH\nComponent Quality\nExcellent\nComponent Certification\nNSF\/ANSI 42, 53, 401 & 372\nSetup\nOutstanding\nServicing Requirements\nExceptional\nCosts\n$0.90\/ gallon\nWarranty Length\n90 days\nShipping\nFree shipping within the continental US on orders above $99\nReturns\nLimited returns\nEpic Pure Pitcher\nThe Epic Pure Pitcher uses a solid carbon block filter that blends three activated carbon media to reduce dozens of common drinking water contaminants. It got the best contaminant score out of all the water filter pitchers we tested, and we were pleased with its quick and easy setup and maintenance processes.\nOverall Score: 8.90\nHow We Test & Score\n9.00\nContaminant Reduction\n6.00\nDesign\n9.50\nMaintenance\n10.00\nFiltration Rate\n9.50\nSetup\n8.95\nCompany\nBest For\nReduced all contaminants to below the HGL benchmark\nContaminant reduction score wasn’t compromised by the introduction of unwanted impurities\nBest value for money\nOption to upgrade to dispenser with a larger water-holding capacity\nSuper easy setup with no filter priming required\nProduct Specs\nPrice\n$70.00\nContaminants Reduced\n200+\nCertifications\nNot certified\nProcess\nSolid Activated Carbon Block\nFilter Capacity\n150 gallons\nAnnual Cost\n~$150\nWarranty\nLifetime\nWhy It’s Best\nThe\nEpic Pure Pitcher\nis the best overall water filter pitcher because it secured the best score for contaminant reduction. \nIn our testing, it reduced all health-related contaminants in our water to below the testing lab’s Health Guideline Levels (HGLs), and, unlike with some of the other pitchers we tested, no unwanted impurities appeared post-filtration.\nPlus, it’s\none of the best-value water filter pitchers we tested\n, costing less than $70 upfront and boasting a super affordable ongoing cost. \nGood to Know:\nEpic sells two water filter pitchers: the Epic Pure and the Epic Nano. The Epic Pure (which we’re reviewing here) is intended for filtering city tap water, while the Epic Nano filter is designed for untreated surface or well water.\nDiscount:\nGet 20% off – Click Here for Code\nEpic Pure Performance\nThe Epic Pure scored a 9.30 for reducing health-related contaminants in our water. Our test results showed that the filter reduced\n100% uranium, copper, and phosphorous, as well as 92% sulfate, 57% molybdenum, 41% barium, 27% fluoride, and 20% nitrate.\nThe system also reduced 100% chlorine in our water, so it scored a 9.90 for improving our water’s aesthetics. \nOur only disappointment was that\nthe filter isn’t performance certified\n, which reduced its score slightly.\nThe Epic Pure also impressed us with its setup and maintenance requirements – we awarded it a score of 9.50 for both categories. Setup was easy because the filter didn’t need priming; we just washed and assembled the pitcher and reservoir, then filtered and discarded the first two pitchers of water. \nWe calculated the pitcher’s\nongoing maintenance cost as $0.31\/ gallon\n, meaning that we’d spend half as much as some of the other top-performing pitchers we tested. Replacing the filter was easy, and the 150-gallon filter capacity is one of the best we’ve seen. The pitcher has an LED countdown timer that helped us to know when to buy new filters. \nWe think the Epic Pure is the\nbest water filter pitcher for folks who want an all-rounder that can effectively reduce a range of contaminants\n, even though not all contaminants were completely eliminated. Anyone who wants a filter that’s affordable and easy to set up and maintain should also be pleased with the Epic Pure pitcher.\nCriteria\nResults\nOverall Score\n8.90\nHealth Related Contaminants\n9.30\nAesthetic Related Contaminants\n9.90\nPerformance Certification\nNot Certified\nFiltration Rate\n2.23 GPH\nComponent Quality\nUnsatisfactory\nComponent Certification\nNot Certified\nSetup\nOutstanding\nServicing Requirements\nOutstanding\nCosts\n$0.31\/ gallon\nWarranty Length\nLifetime\nShipping\nFree shipping for the Clean Water Club only\nReturns\nLifetime\nClearly Filtered Pitcher\nThe Clearly Filtered Water Pitcher reduced more contaminants than most other water filter pitchers we’ve tested, and it has an advantage over the Epic Pure pitcher:\na WQA performance certification for chlorine and PFOA\/PFOS reduction.\nOverall Score: 8.78\nHow We Test & Score\n8.24\nContaminant Reduction\n9.70\nDesign\n8.75\nMaintenance\n10.00\nFiltration Rate\n9.50\nSetup\n9.00\nCompany\nBest For\nThorough water filtration \nWQA performance certified\nSturdy, durable design\nLong 100-gallon filter life\nRoomy 10-cup capacity\nProduct Specs\nPrice\n$90.00\nContaminants Reduced\n350+\nCertifications\nNSF\/ANSI 42 & 53\nProcess\nCoconut Carbon Block\nFilter Capacity\n100 gallons\nAnnual Cost\n~$150\nWarranty\n1 year\nWhat We Thought\nThe\nClearly Filtered Water Pitcher\nis the water filter pitcher that we recommend for folks who want a system with a\ngreat overall contaminant reduction performance\n. \nIt offered a greater contaminant reduction percentage than most similar systems in our testing, and we also noted that the pitcher materials felt sturdier and thicker than other pitchers, which felt flimsier and thinner in comparison.\nSetup was also really easy for the Clearly Filtered pitcher. Rather than having to filter and discard several batches of water (which is time-consuming), we primed the filter using the included priming bag, which took less than 10 minutes.\nDiscount:\nGet 10% off – Click Here for Code\nClearly Filtered Performance\nWe awarded the Clearly Filtered Pitcher a score of 8.24 for overall contaminant reduction.\nIt did better than the Epic Pure at reducing 100% fluoride, and its 100% uranium\n, chlorine, and copper reduction matched Epic’s results. \nThe CF pitcher also reduced 86% barium, 67% strontium, and 53% molybdenum.\nBu\nt\nits score was affected by the presence of 0.0054 PPM of cobalt in our filtered water\n(it hadn’t been detected pre-filtration). \nThere were two standout performance features that gave Clearly Filtered the edge over Epic: its WQA performance certifications and its high-quality plastic design.\nThe pitcher has been certified (to NSF Standards\n42\nand\n53\n) to reduce\n3 out of the 365+ contaminants it’s claimed to reduce,\nso it’s not the most impressive proof of performance that we’ve seen, but it’s still more reassuring than nothing.\nAs for design, the Clearly Filtered pitcher got a score of 9.70. The pitcher is made from BPA-free Tritan plastic and is\nWQA certified for lead-free design\n, on top of holding a materials safety certification as a component of its performance certifications. \nWe timed the filtration process and recorded that the\nCF pitcher filtered 0.5 gallons of water in 13 minutes and 12 seconds\n, giving it a 2.27 GPH filtration rate. This put it slightly ahead of the Epic Pure, which had a 2.23 GPH filtration rate – but both filters got the top score here.\nWe think the Clearly Filtered Pitcher makes the most sense for people who are happy to pay a slightly higher upfront and ongoing cost to effectively address many contaminants in their water with a system that’s\ncertified for performance and materials safety\n. \nCriteria\nResults\nOverall Score\n8.78\nHealth Related Contaminants\n8.30\nAesthetic Related Contaminants\n9.90\nPerformance Certification\nCertified for <1% of reduction claims\nFiltration Rate\n2.27 GPH\nComponent Quality\nOutstanding\nComponent Certification\nCertified\nSetup\nOutstanding\nServicing Requirements\nOutstanding\nCosts\n$0.55\/ gallon\nWarranty Length\n1 year\nShipping\nFree shipping\nReturns\n30 days\nSantevia MINA Pitcher\nThe Santevia MINA Pitcher is the only alkalizing water filter pitcher to make our list. It did a great job of reducing many contaminants in our water, and we were impressed with its ability to\nraise water pH by up to 2.0\n(although our own results varied – more on that later).\nOverall Score: 8.45\nHow We Test & Score\n8.12\nContaminant Reduction\n8.10\nDesign\n9.75\nMaintenance\n8.50\nFiltration Rate\n9.50\nSetup\n7.95\nCompany\nBest For\nReducing contaminants\nand\nincreasing water’s alkalinity & pH\nBudget-friendly – costs less than $50 upfront\nEasy to maintain\nProduct Specs\nPrice\n$49.99\nContaminants Reduced\n85\nCertifications\nNot certified\nProcess\nCarbon + Ion Exchange + Remineralization\nFilter Capacity\n80 gallons\nAnnual Cost\n~$120\nWarranty\n90 days\nWhy We Liked It\nThe\nSantevia MINA\nwas the best alkalizing water filter pitcher we tested, being the only filter to reduce healthy contaminants\nand\nincrease the pH and alkalinity of water. \nIt’s also the most affordable of all the pitchers we’ve mentioned in this guide so far, falling within the $0-$50 price bracket, and with an ongoing\ncost of just $0.25\/ gallon\n– impressive given that it provides an additional water quality advantage that none of the other systems offer.\nSantevia MINA Performance\nThe Santevia MINA pitcher’s overall contaminant reduction score was 8.12, putting it only slightly behind Clearly Filtered and Epic Pure. It\nreduced 7 contaminants in our water\n: 100% chlorine, uranium, molybdenum, and copper, 78% barium, 77% nitrate, and 72% strontium.\nHowever, the MINA pitcher isn’t performance-certified, which affected its overall score in this category. Plus,\nfluoride actually increased slightly from 1.1 PPM to 1.2 PPM\n, telling us that the filter doesn’t effectively address this contaminant.\nSantevia’s main selling point is its ability to increase the alkalinity of water, which has a\nfew possible health benefits\n. When we first got the pitcher, we used a pH meter to test our water.\nThe unfiltered water had a 7.89 pH, and our filtered water’s pH had increased to 9.94. However, when we tested the pitcher later with a lab test, pH only increased by 0.1, from 7.4 to 7.5. \nThe system got an 8.50 score from us for its filtration rate.\nIt filtered 0.383 gallons of water in just over 16 minutes\n, giving it a filtration rate of 1.43 GPH – around 1 GPM slower than most other pitchers we tested. \nWe couldn’t fault the filter setup process. It also got a 9.50 in this category because\nassembly took less than 5 minutes\n– we just had to wash and assemble the pitcher, then hold the filter under running water for 1 minute until the water ran clear.\nWe think the Santevia MINA pitcher is a great fit for folks who want to go a step further than simply reducing contaminants in their water, and anyone who wants the possible taste and health benefits of filtered water with an alkaline pH. \nCriteria\nResults\nOverall Score\n8.45\nHealth Related Contaminants\n8.30\nAesthetic Related Contaminants\n9.50\nPerformance Certification\nNot certified\nFiltration Rate\n1.43 GPH\nComponent Quality\nOutstanding\nComponent Certification\nNot certified\nSetup\nOutstanding\nServicing Requirements\nOutstanding\nCosts\n$0.25\/ gallon\nWarranty Length\n90 days\nShipping\nFree shipping on orders over $99, except Hawaii, Puerto Rico & Alaska\nReturns\n30 days\nLARQ Pure-Vis Advanced Pitcher\nThe LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced Pitcher filters and purifies water with a unique 2-stage process involving a\nfilter cartridge and a UV wand\n. It reduced numerous contaminants in our testing, and we thought it had the most attractive design of all the water filter pitchers we tested.\nOverall Score: 8.21\nHow We Test & Score\n8.14\nContaminant Reduction\n8.10\nDesign\n9.00\nMaintenance\n7.00\nFiltration Rate\n9.00\nSetup\n8.35\nCompany\nBest For\nPrevents bacteria growth with UV disinfection\nAttractive, quality design\nEasy assembly and maintenance\nThe only high-tech pitcher we reviewed\nProduct Specs\nPrice\n$139.00\nContaminants Reduced\n60+\nCertifications\nNot Certified\nProcess\nActivated Carbon + UV Purification\nFilter Capacity\n60 gallons\nAnnual Cost\n~$150\nWarranty\n1 year\nOur Take\nThe\nLARQ Pure-Vis Advanced Pitcher\nis the most expensive water filter pitcher we’ve tried, but it’s the only pitcher with a unique UV purification stage to prevent bacterial growth in the filtered water chamber.\nThe pitcher’s filtration performance wasn’t far off Clearly Filtered’s – it got the same score in our lab testing, but it doesn’t have a performance certification.\nLARQ Pure-Vis Performance\nWe awarded the LARQ Pure-Vis pitcher an 8.14 for contaminant reduction. It did a great job of removing 100% uranium, barium, strontium, and molybdenum, and reducing 97% copper, 88% sulfate, and 20% nitrate.\nUnfortunately, it didn’t reduce fluoride in our water at all\n. \nThe Pure-Vis pitcher’s UV purification stage is the biggest reason why we were drawn to the system. Microorganisms aren’t present in treated city water, but a number of studies (including\nthis study on Brita water filter pitchers\n) have found that microorganisms can grow in filter media. The LARQ pitcher provides protection against bacteria growth in the filter media and the pitcher chamber, so we didn’t have to wash it out as often as the other pitchers. \nThe system did well in the setup and maintenance categories, with scores of 9.00 in each. Setup was a\nbit\nmore involved – we had to\nsoak the filter for 10 minutes before installing it\n, charge the battery pack for the UV wand, and install the app. Maintenance required the same filter soaking and UV wand charging (but the battery lasts around 1 month on a full charge).\nWe estimated the filter’s ongoing cost as $0.54\/ gallon, so it’s about on par with the Clearly Filtered pitcher – not the cheapest, but not as costly as Culligan ZeroWater.\nAs for design, the LARQ pitcher felt like it was made from the same high-quality materials as Clearly Filtered. It felt thick, solid, and durable, and more capable of withstanding long-term use than the other pitchers we tested.\nIn our opinion, the LARQ Pure-Vis pitcher is ideal for anyone who has concerns about biofilm growth and microorganisms in their filter media and the pitcher vessel itself, and folks who want the reassurance of filtering and purifying their water at the same time.\nCriteria\nResults\nOverall Score\n8.21\nHealth Related Contaminants\n8.30\nAesthetic Related Contaminants\n9.90\nPerformance Certification\nNot Certified\nFiltration Rate\n0.60 GPH\nComponent Quality\nOutstanding\nComponent Certification\nNot Certified\nSetup\nExcellent\nServicing Requirements\nExceptional\nCosts\n$0.54\/ gallon\nWarranty Length\n1 year\nShipping\nFree on orders over $80 within the contiguous US\nReturns\n30 days, but only if unopened\nFilters That Didn’t Make the Cut\nWe want to close off this review with a quick mention of the other three pitchers we tested, which received lower performance scores than the rest and therefore didn’t make the cut. \nThese were: \nThe PUR Plus Pitcher\nThe Brita Elite Pitcher\nThe Waterdrop Chubby Pitcher\nThese filters all got poorer contaminant reduction scores: the PUR Plus got 5.28; the Brita Elite got 4.29; and the Waterdrop Chubby got 4.24. \nNone of the pitchers are tested or certified to reduce most of the contaminants (like uranium, fluoride, and molybdenum) in our water. So we were unsurprised when the pitchers did a poor job of reducing these contaminants. \nOur testing outcomes don’t necessarily mean that the filters are incapable of reducing contaminants;\njust that they couldn’t address our own water quality concerns\n. If we’d tested the filters with water predominantly containing contaminants they\ncould\naddress, the contaminant reduction scores would likely have been higher. \nThat’s why testing your water before buying a filter is so important: you want to ensure that the system you choose can effectively address your unique water quality issues. \nPresident & CEO, CWS, CWR\nBrian Campbell, a WQA Certified Water Specialist (CWS) and Certified Water Treatment Representative (CWR) with 5+ years of experience, helps homeowners navigate the world of water treatment. After honing his skills at Hach Company, he founded his business to empower homeowners with the knowledge and tools to achieve safe, healthy water. Brian's tested countless devices, from simple pitchers to complex systems, helping his readers find the perfect fit for their unique needs.","attrs_markdown":"[Skip to content](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#content)\n\nWe may earn compensation from some providers below. [Learn More](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/disclaimer\/)\n\n[![WaterFilterGuru.com](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/Logo_large_medium-240x51.png)](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/)\n\n- [Water Filtration](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/)\n  - Comparisons\n    - [Best Water Filters of 2026](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filters\/)\n    - [Best Whole House Water Filters](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-whole-house-water-filter-reviews\/)\n    - [Best Water Filter Pitchers](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/)\n  - Guides\n    - [Emergency Water Filters](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-emergency-water-filter\/)\n    - [Reverse Osmosis Systems](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-reverse-osmosis-system-reviews\/)\n    - [Under-Sink Filters](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-under-sink-water-filter-reviews\/)\n    - [Countertop Filters](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-countertop-water-filter-reviews\/)\n  - Water Filter Resources\n    - [Filter Finder Quiz](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/find-your-system\/)\n    - [How to Choose a Water Filter](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/how-to-choose-a-water-filter\/)\n    - [Water Filter Buyer’s Guide](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/water-filtration-systems\/)\n    - [RO System Buyer’s Guide](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/reverse-osmosis-systems\/)\n- [Hard Water](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/)\n  - Comparisons\n    - [Best Water Softeners](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-softener-reviews\/)\n    - [Best Salt-Free Water Conditioners](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-salt-free-water-softener\/)\n  - Guides\n    - [How to Size a Water Softener](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/what-size-water-softener-do-i-need\/)\n    - [Water Softener Buyer’s Guide](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/water-softener-systems\/)\n  - Hard Water Resources\n    - [Hard Water Treatment Guide](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/how-to-soften-hard-water\/)\n    - [Hard Water vs Soft Water](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/hard-water-vs-soft-water\/)\n- [Well Water](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/)\n  - Comparisons\n    - [Best Well Water Filtration Systems](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-whole-house-water-filter-for-well-water\/)\n    - [Best Water Softeners for Well Water](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-softener-for-well-water\/)\n  - Guides\n    - [Owning a Home on Well Water](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/well-water\/)\n    - [UV Water Purifier Guide](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/uv-water-purifier-systems\/)\n- [Contaminants](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/)\n  - Comparisons\n    - [Best Water Filters for Fluoride](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-fluoride-water-filter\/)\n    - [Best Water Filters for Lead](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-for-lead\/)\n    - [Best Water Filters for PFAs](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-for-pfas\/)\n    - [Best Water Filters for Microplastics](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-for-microplastics\/)\n  - Water Testing\n    - [How to Test Water Quality](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/how-to-test-water-quality\/)\n    - [Water Contaminants Guide](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/common-drinking-water-contaminants\/)\n    - [Best Water Test Kits](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-home-water-test-kit\/)\n    - [Tap Score Review](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/tap-score-review\/)\n- [About Us](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/)\n  - [Our Company](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/about-us\/)\n  - [YouTube Channel](https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@waterfilterguru?sub_confirmation=1)\n  - [Our Research](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/research\/)\n  - [Blog](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/blog\/)\n- [Store](https:\/\/shop.waterfilterguru.com\/)\n\n[Book Consultation](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/consulting\/)\n\n[Book Consultation](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/consulting\/)\n\n[Search](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/)\n\nWe may earn compensation from some providers below. [Learn More](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/disclaimer\/)\n\n[![WaterFilterGuru.com](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/09\/Logo_large_medium-240x51.png)](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/)\n\n- [Water Filtration](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/)\n  - Comparisons\n    - [Best Water Filters of 2026](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filters\/)\n    - [Best Whole House Water Filters](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-whole-house-water-filter-reviews\/)\n    - [Best Water Filter Pitchers](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/)\n  - Guides\n    - [Emergency Water Filters](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-emergency-water-filter\/)\n    - [Reverse Osmosis Systems](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-reverse-osmosis-system-reviews\/)\n    - [Under-Sink Filters](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-under-sink-water-filter-reviews\/)\n    - [Countertop Filters](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-countertop-water-filter-reviews\/)\n  - Water Filter Resources\n    - [Filter Finder Quiz](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/find-your-system\/)\n    - [How to Choose a Water Filter](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/how-to-choose-a-water-filter\/)\n    - [Water Filter Buyer’s Guide](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/water-filtration-systems\/)\n    - [RO System Buyer’s Guide](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/reverse-osmosis-systems\/)\n- [Hard Water](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/)\n  - Comparisons\n    - [Best Water Softeners](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-softener-reviews\/)\n    - [Best Salt-Free Water Conditioners](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-salt-free-water-softener\/)\n  - Guides\n    - [How to Size a Water Softener](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/what-size-water-softener-do-i-need\/)\n    - [Water Softener Buyer’s Guide](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/water-softener-systems\/)\n  - Hard Water Resources\n    - [Hard Water Treatment Guide](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/how-to-soften-hard-water\/)\n    - [Hard Water vs Soft Water](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/hard-water-vs-soft-water\/)\n- [Well Water](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/)\n  - Comparisons\n    - [Best Well Water Filtration Systems](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-whole-house-water-filter-for-well-water\/)\n    - [Best Water Softeners for Well Water](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-softener-for-well-water\/)\n  - Guides\n    - [Owning a Home on Well Water](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/well-water\/)\n    - [UV Water Purifier Guide](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/uv-water-purifier-systems\/)\n- [Contaminants](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/)\n  - Comparisons\n    - [Best Water Filters for Fluoride](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-fluoride-water-filter\/)\n    - [Best Water Filters for Lead](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-for-lead\/)\n    - [Best Water Filters for PFAs](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-for-pfas\/)\n    - [Best Water Filters for Microplastics](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-for-microplastics\/)\n  - Water Testing\n    - [How to Test Water Quality](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/how-to-test-water-quality\/)\n    - [Water Contaminants Guide](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/common-drinking-water-contaminants\/)\n    - [Best Water Test Kits](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-home-water-test-kit\/)\n    - [Tap Score Review](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/tap-score-review\/)\n- [About Us](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/)\n  - [Our Company](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/about-us\/)\n  - [YouTube Channel](https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@waterfilterguru?sub_confirmation=1)\n  - [Our Research](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/research\/)\n  - [Blog](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/blog\/)\n- [Store](https:\/\/shop.waterfilterguru.com\/)\n\n[Book Consultation](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/consulting\/)\n\n[Book Consultation](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/consulting\/)\n\n- [Home](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/)\n- [Water Filtration Systems](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/category\/water-filter-systems\/)\n- The 5 Best Water Filter Pitchers, According to Our Testing\n\n# The 5 Best Water Filter Pitchers, According to Our Testing\nupdated: February 1, 2026\n\n🤝 Our content is written by humans, not AI robots. [Learn More](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/editorial-guidelines\/#written-by-real-humans)\n\n- ![Brian Campbell headshot](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/brian-headshot.jpg)\n  [Brian Campbell](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/author\/brian\/ \"Brian Campbell\")\n\nThe **best water filter pitchers** are affordable, portable, and reduce dozens of contaminants using gravity-fed water filtration.\n\nWe use our own evidence-based testing to review and compare water filters.\n\nI’ve personally tested all the water filters on this list, leveraging my experience as a WQA Certified Water Specialist (CWS) and Certified Water Treatment Representative (CWR) to review each product as both an expert and a customer.\n\n![Culligan ZeroWater pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Culligan-ZeroWater.jpg)\n\nOverall Score: 9.33\n\nCulligan ZeroWater\n\nBest contaminant reduction performance\n\nMost extensively certified\n\nBest value for money\n\nEasy to set up, no filter priming needed\n\n[View at culligan.com](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/go\/culligan-zerowater-pitcher)\n\n[View on Amazon](https:\/\/amzn.to\/3Wz0jon)\n\n![Epic Pure Water Filter Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Epic-Pure-Water-Filter-Pitcher.jpg)\n\nOverall Score: 8.90\n\nEpic Pure Pitcher\n\nSecond highest score for contaminant reduction\n\nBest value for money\n\nEasy to set up, no filter priming needed\n\nAffordable ongoing cost\n\n[View at epicwaterfilters.com](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/go\/epic-pure-pitcher)\n\n[View on Amazon](https:\/\/amzn.to\/3Qj4Qer)\n\n[View at Walmart](https:\/\/goto.walmart.com\/c\/2277861\/565706\/9383?veh=aff&sourceid=imp_000011112222333344&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.walmart.com%2Fip%2FEpic-Pure-Water-Filter-Pitcher-3-5L-150-Gallon-100-BPA-Free-Removes-Fluoride-Lead-Chromium-6-PFOS-PFOA-Heavy-Metals-Pesticides-Chemicals-Industrial-P%2F115196799)\n\n![Clearly Filtered Water Pitcher (400x400)](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Clearly-Filtered-Water-Pitcher-400x400-1.jpg)\n\nOverall Score: 8.78\n\nClearly Filtered Water Pitcher\n\nReduced the most contaminants in our lab tests\n\nHighest quality design materials\n\nCertified for performance & materials safety\n\nReduced 100% fluoride\n\n[View at clearlyfiltered.com](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/go\/clearly-filtered-pitcher)\n\n[View on Amazon](https:\/\/amzn.to\/4m56xGx)\n\nTable of Contents\n\n- [Our Testing & Selection Process](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#Our_Testing_Selection_Process)\n- [The 5 Best Water Filter Pitchers](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#The_5_Best_Water_Filter_Pitchers)\n- [Culligan ZeroWater](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#Culligan_ZeroWater)\n- [Epic Pure Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#Epic_Pure_Pitcher)\n- [Clearly Filtered Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#Clearly_Filtered_Pitcher)\n- [Santevia MINA Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#Santevia_MINA_Pitcher)\n- [LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#LARQ_Pure-Vis_Advanced_Pitcher)\n- [Filters That Didn’t Make the Cut](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#Filters_That_Didnt_Make_the_Cut)\n## Our Testing & Selection Process\nHow We Test & Score\n\nWe use a metrics-driven process to test water filters for their performance. Our aim is to evaluate a system’s performance capabilities, value for money, and suitability for a specific situation or intended outcome.  \n  \nFor our Best Water Filter Pitchers guide, we cherry-picked the filters that obtained the highest scores across each of our scoring categories, **with a particular focus on contaminant reduction.**  \n  \n![scoring factors pie chart](data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%201024%20666'%3E%3C\/svg%3E)![scoring factors pie chart](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/scoring-factors-1024x666.png)  \n  \nWe scored these pitchers based on how effectively they reduced contaminants in our water, what we thought about their design quality, their ease of setup and maintenance, and more. We also compared filter materials and technologies, and evaluated third-party lab test results when the manufacturer provided them, though these are not scoring factors.  \n  \nTo ensure the fairest comparisons, we use fact-based, numerical data whenever we can. But some testing categories require us to conduct our own subjective assessment, giving our personal insight into a specific aspect of a product’s performance.  \n  \n[You can see our complete testing and scoring process here.](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/how-we-test-water-filters\/)\n\nHow We Choose the Winners\n\nTo choose the best water filter pitchers, we evaluated all the filters we’ve reviewed and compared their testing data side-by-side.   \n  \nWe selected the highest-scoring products, paying close attention to the filters that reduced the most contaminants in our water.   \n  \nThe water filter pitchers we’ve recommended each have their own unique filter technologies and produce different outcomes. We aimed to provide enough variety to offer targeted recommendations for specific budgets and situations.   \n  \nWe automatically excluded some products from this guide, including:  \n  \n1\\. Countertop dispensers, units that require electricity to operate, and systems that can’t be classed as gravity-fed water filter pitchers.   \n2\\. Filters with availability\/stock issues, or those not available in the USA.  \n3\\. Systems that were unable to match up to their competitors due to poorer contaminant reduction performance, those sold by lesser-known or less trustworthy brands, or those offering poorer value on the whole.\n\nArticle Update History\n\n11\/07\/2025 – Added Culligan ZeroWater, removed Legacy ZeroWater\n## The 5 Best Water Filter Pitchers\n| Product | ![culligan zerowater Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Culligan-ZeroWater.jpg)  Culligan ZeroWater | ![Epic Nano Water Filter Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Epic-Pure-Water-Filter-Pitcher.jpg)  Epic Pure | ![Clearly Filtered Water Pitcher](data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%20400%20400'%3E%3C\/svg%3E)![Clearly Filtered Water Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Clearly-Filtered-Water-Pitcher.png)  Clearly Filtered | ![Santevia MINA Pitcher](data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%201024%20983'%3E%3C\/svg%3E)![Santevia MINA Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/Santevia-MINA-Alkaline-Pitcher-1024x983.jpg)  Santevia MINA | ![LARQ Pure Vis Advanced Pitcher](data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%20400%20400'%3E%3C\/svg%3E)![LARQ Pure Vis Advanced Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/LARQ-Pure-Vis-Advanced-Pitcher.png)  LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced |\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| Score | 9\\.33 | 8\\.90 | 8\\.78 | 8\\.45 | 8\\.21 |\n| Price | \\$24.99+ | \\$70.00 | \\$90.00 | \\$49.99 | \\$139.00 |\n| Certifications | NSF\/ANSI 42, 53, 401 & 372 | Not certified | NSF\/ANSI 42 & 53 | Not certified | Not certified |\n| Filter Capacity | 20 gallons | 150 gallons | 100 gallons | 80 gallons | 60 gallons |\n| Cost per Gallon | \\$0.90 | \\$0.31 | \\$0.55 | \\$0.25 | \\$0.54 |\n| Warranty | 90 days | Lifetime | 1 year | 90 days | 1 year |\n| Read Review | [Culligan ZeroWater review](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/culligan-zerowater-review\/) | [Epic Pure review](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/epic-pure-water-filter-review\/) | [Clearly Filtered review](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/clearly-filtered-water-pitcher-review\/) | [Santevia MINA review](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/santevia-mina-review\/) | [LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced review](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/) |\n\n## Culligan ZeroWater\n![Culligan ZeroWater](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Culligan-ZeroWater.jpg)\n\nThe Culligan ZeroWater Pitcher is the highest-scoring water filter pitcher we tested, earning an overall weighted score of 9.33. It removed more contaminants than any other water filter pitcher we tested and was **the only product to be certified for 100% of its contaminant reduction claims**. It also has a sturdier, better-quality construction than most other pitchers (with the exception of Clearly Filtered), *but* it did demineralize our water, and it has the highest maintenance cost of all the filters in this list.\n\nOverall Score: 9.33\n\nHow We Test & Score\n\n9\\.65 Contaminant Reduction\n\n9\\.40 Design\n\n8\\.00 Maintenance\n\n9\\.50 Filtration Rate\n\n9\\.50 Setup\n\n7\\.60 Company\n\n### Best For\nThe only pitcher to remove 100% of all metals, minerals, and inorganics\n\nHigher-quality design than most other pitchers\n\nIAPMO certified for 100% of contaminants claimed to reduce\n\nCertified for materials safety\n\nFast filtration\n### Product Specs\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Price | \\$24.99+ |\n| Contaminants Reduced | 25+ |\n| Certifications or Testing | NSF\/ANSI 42, 53, 401 & 372 |\n| Holding Capacity | 7-40 cups |\n| Filter Lifespan | 20 gallons |\n| Approx. Annual Cost | \\$160+ |\n\n[View at culligan.com](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/go\/culligan-zerowater-pitcher)\n\n[View on Amazon](https:\/\/amzn.to\/3Wz0jon)\n\n****Discount:**** Get 10% off – Click Here for Code\n### Our Lab Tests\nIn our Tap Score testing, the [Culligan ZeroWater Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/culligan-zerowater-review\/) **outperformed all the other water filter pitchers we reviewed, removing 100% of all contaminants with health effects in our water**, including uranium and fluoride, both initially detected in concentrations exceeding the HGL. It also eliminated sulfate, chlorine, nitrate, zinc, copper, strontium, barium, and molybdenum.\n\n[![Made with Flourish](data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C\/svg%3E)![Made with Flourish](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/resources\/made_with_flourish.svg)](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/visualisation\/26096129\/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation\/26096129)\n\n[![Made with Flourish](data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C\/svg%3E)![Made with Flourish](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/resources\/made_with_flourish.svg)](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/visualisation\/26096100\/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation\/26096100)\n\n**ZeroWater filters use a dual ion exchange process, which greatly reduces or removes *all* charged ions.** As a result, we also saw reductions or eliminations of carbonate, calcium, magnesium, bicarbonate, sodium, and hardness. The pH of our water was reduced from 7.6 (slightly alkaline) to 6.6 (slightly acidic), leading to a lower aesthetics score of 8.00. Since a big part of the filter’s marketing is its ability to reduce TDS down to 0, there’s no included remineralization media to mitigate these effects.\n\nOverall, though, the pitcher still earned the highest contaminant reduction score on this list (9.65), partly due to its exceptional health-related contaminant reduction and partly because it’s the only pitcher to have IAPMO certifications to [NSF 42](https:\/\/pld.iapmo.org\/file_info.asp?file_no=0017154), [NSF 53](https:\/\/pld.iapmo.org\/file_info.asp?file_no=0017154), and [NSF 401](https:\/\/pld.iapmo.org\/file_info.asp?file_no=0017156), for every single contaminant that it’s claimed to reduce.\n\n### Other Scoring Factors\n![Culligan ZeroWater Pitcher](data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%20800%20520'%3E%3C\/svg%3E)\n\n![Culligan ZeroWater Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Culligan-ZeroWater-Pitcher.jpg)\n\nWhen we consider just how thoroughly the Culligan ZeroWater Pitcher filtered our water, its filtration rate of 1.9 GPH (gallons per hour) is pretty impressive. It’s not the fastest filter on this list – Epic Pure, Clearly Filtered, and the legacy ZeroWater were quicker – but it still **took just 7 minutes to filter a full pitcher of water, earning it a score of 9.50.**\n\nWhere Culligan ZeroWater *did* come out on top was in the design category, with a high score of 9.40. Most of the other pitchers we tested had construction issues, with thin, flimsy-feeling plastic. The Culligan ZeroWater pitcher feels sturdy, and it’s **IAPMO certified for materials safety and [lead-free design](https:\/\/pld.iapmo.org\/file_info.asp?file_no=0017157)**. You can choose from several pitcher sizes and capacities, from the smallest 7-cup model to the largest 40-cup glass dispenser.\n\n**We were able to get the pitcher set up and ready to use in less than 5 minutes,** earning it a high setup score of 9.50. But it had the highest filter replacement cost of all the filters we tested for this review (\\$0.90, based on its 20-gallon capacity, as outlined in its certification listing), resulting in the lowest maintenance score of just 8.00.\n\nLooking at Culligan’s company policies, the **90-day warranty is one of the lowest we’ve seen for a water filter pitcher**, and you’ll have to pay for shipping unless you spend more than \\$99 on your order. The ambiguous returns policy (each return is treated “uniquely”) was also a letdown, contributing to its company score of 7.60.\n\n| Criteria | Results |\n|---|---|\n| Overall Score | 9\\.33 |\n| Health Related Contaminants | 9\\.70 |\n| Aesthetic Related Contaminants | 8\\.00 |\n| Performance Certification | NSF\/ANSI 42, 53, 401 |\n| Filtration Rate | 1\\.9 GPH |\n| Component Quality | Excellent |\n| Component Certification | NSF\/ANSI 42, 53, 401 & 372 |\n| Setup | Outstanding |\n| Servicing Requirements | Exceptional |\n| Costs | \\$0.90\/ gallon |\n| Warranty Length | 90 days |\n| Shipping | Free shipping within the continental US on orders above \\$99 |\n| Returns | Limited returns |\n\n## Epic Pure Pitcher\n![Epic Pure Water Filter Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Epic-Pure-Water-Filter-Pitcher.jpg)\n\nThe Epic Pure Pitcher uses a solid carbon block filter that blends three activated carbon media to reduce dozens of common drinking water contaminants. It got the best contaminant score out of all the water filter pitchers we tested, and we were pleased with its quick and easy setup and maintenance processes.\n\nOverall Score: 8.90\n\nHow We Test & Score\n\n9\\.00 Contaminant Reduction\n\n6\\.00 Design\n\n9\\.50 Maintenance\n\n10\\.00 Filtration Rate\n\n9\\.50 Setup\n\n8\\.95 Company\n\n### Best For\nReduced all contaminants to below the HGL benchmark\n\nContaminant reduction score wasn’t compromised by the introduction of unwanted impurities\n\nBest value for money\n\nOption to upgrade to dispenser with a larger water-holding capacity\n\nSuper easy setup with no filter priming required\n### Product Specs\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Price | \\$70.00 |\n| Contaminants Reduced | 200+ |\n| Certifications | Not certified |\n| Process | Solid Activated Carbon Block |\n| Filter Capacity | 150 gallons |\n| Annual Cost | ~\\$150 |\n| Warranty | Lifetime |\n### Why It’s Best\nThe [**Epic Pure Pitcher**](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/epic-pure-water-filter-review\/) is the best overall water filter pitcher because it secured the best score for contaminant reduction.\n\nIn our testing, it reduced all health-related contaminants in our water to below the testing lab’s Health Guideline Levels (HGLs), and, unlike with some of the other pitchers we tested, no unwanted impurities appeared post-filtration.\n\nPlus, it’s **one of the best-value water filter pitchers we tested**, costing less than \\$70 upfront and boasting a super affordable ongoing cost.\n\n**Good to Know:** Epic sells two water filter pitchers: the Epic Pure and the Epic Nano. The Epic Pure (which we’re reviewing here) is intended for filtering city tap water, while the Epic Nano filter is designed for untreated surface or well water.\n\n[View at epicwaterfilters.com](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/go\/epic-pure-pitcher)\n\n[View on Amazon](https:\/\/amzn.to\/3Qj4Qer)\n\n[View at Walmart](https:\/\/goto.walmart.com\/c\/2277861\/565706\/9383?veh=aff&sourceid=imp_000011112222333344&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.walmart.com%2Fip%2FEpic-Pure-Water-Filter-Pitcher-3-5L-150-Gallon-100-BPA-Free-Removes-Fluoride-Lead-Chromium-6-PFOS-PFOA-Heavy-Metals-Pesticides-Chemicals-Industrial-P%2F115196799)\n\n****Discount:**** Get 20% off – Click Here for Code\n### Epic Pure Performance\nThe Epic Pure scored a 9.30 for reducing health-related contaminants in our water. Our test results showed that the filter reduced **100% uranium, copper, and phosphorous, as well as 92% sulfate, 57% molybdenum, 41% barium, 27% fluoride, and 20% nitrate.**\n\n[![Made with Flourish](data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C\/svg%3E)![Made with Flourish](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/resources\/made_with_flourish.svg)](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/visualisation\/17159127\/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation\/17159127)\n\n[![Made with Flourish](data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C\/svg%3E)![Made with Flourish](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/resources\/made_with_flourish.svg)](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/visualisation\/17159109\/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation\/17159109)\n\nThe system also reduced 100% chlorine in our water, so it scored a 9.90 for improving our water’s aesthetics.\n\nOur only disappointment was that **the filter isn’t performance certified**, which reduced its score slightly.\n\nThe Epic Pure also impressed us with its setup and maintenance requirements – we awarded it a score of 9.50 for both categories. Setup was easy because the filter didn’t need priming; we just washed and assembled the pitcher and reservoir, then filtered and discarded the first two pitchers of water.\n\nWe calculated the pitcher’s **ongoing maintenance cost as \\$0.31\/ gallon**, meaning that we’d spend half as much as some of the other top-performing pitchers we tested. Replacing the filter was easy, and the 150-gallon filter capacity is one of the best we’ve seen. The pitcher has an LED countdown timer that helped us to know when to buy new filters.\n\nWe think the Epic Pure is the **best water filter pitcher for folks who want an all-rounder that can effectively reduce a range of contaminants**, even though not all contaminants were completely eliminated. Anyone who wants a filter that’s affordable and easy to set up and maintain should also be pleased with the Epic Pure pitcher.\n\n| Criteria | Results |\n|---|---|\n| Overall Score | 8\\.90 |\n| Health Related Contaminants | 9\\.30 |\n| Aesthetic Related Contaminants | 9\\.90 |\n| Performance Certification | Not Certified |\n| Filtration Rate | 2\\.23 GPH |\n| Component Quality | Unsatisfactory |\n| Component Certification | Not Certified |\n| Setup | Outstanding |\n| Servicing Requirements | Outstanding |\n| Costs | \\$0.31\/ gallon |\n| Warranty Length | Lifetime |\n| Shipping | Free shipping for the Clean Water Club only |\n| Returns | Lifetime |\n\n## Clearly Filtered Pitcher\n![Clearly Filtered water pitcher (400x400)](data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%20400%20400'%3E%3C\/svg%3E)\n\n![Clearly Filtered water pitcher (400x400)](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Clearly-Filtered-Water-Pitcher.png)\n\nThe Clearly Filtered Water Pitcher reduced more contaminants than most other water filter pitchers we’ve tested, and it has an advantage over the Epic Pure pitcher: **a WQA performance certification for chlorine and PFOA\/PFOS reduction.**\n\nOverall Score: 8.78\n\nHow We Test & Score\n\n8\\.24 Contaminant Reduction\n\n9\\.70 Design\n\n8\\.75 Maintenance\n\n10\\.00 Filtration Rate\n\n9\\.50 Setup\n\n9\\.00 Company\n\n### Best For\nThorough water filtration\n\nWQA performance certified\n\nSturdy, durable design\n\nLong 100-gallon filter life\n\nRoomy 10-cup capacity\n### Product Specs\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Price | \\$90.00 |\n| Contaminants Reduced | 350+ |\n| Certifications | NSF\/ANSI 42 & 53 |\n| Process | Coconut Carbon Block |\n| Filter Capacity | 100 gallons |\n| Annual Cost | ~\\$150 |\n| Warranty | 1 year |\n### What We Thought\nThe [**Clearly Filtered Water Pitcher**](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/clearly-filtered-water-pitcher-review\/) is the water filter pitcher that we recommend for folks who want a system with a **great overall contaminant reduction performance**.\n\nIt offered a greater contaminant reduction percentage than most similar systems in our testing, and we also noted that the pitcher materials felt sturdier and thicker than other pitchers, which felt flimsier and thinner in comparison.\n\nSetup was also really easy for the Clearly Filtered pitcher. Rather than having to filter and discard several batches of water (which is time-consuming), we primed the filter using the included priming bag, which took less than 10 minutes.\n\n[View at clearlyfiltered.com](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/go\/clearly-filtered-pitcher)\n\n[View on Amazon](https:\/\/amzn.to\/4m56xGx)\n\n****Discount:**** Get 10% off – Click Here for Code\n### Clearly Filtered Performance\nWe awarded the Clearly Filtered Pitcher a score of 8.24 for overall contaminant reduction. **It did better than the Epic Pure at reducing 100% fluoride, and its 100% uranium**, chlorine, and copper reduction matched Epic’s results.\n\n[![Made with Flourish](data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C\/svg%3E)![Made with Flourish](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/resources\/made_with_flourish.svg)](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/visualisation\/17080093\/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation\/17080093)\n\nThe CF pitcher also reduced 86% barium, 67% strontium, and 53% molybdenum. **Bu**t **its score was affected by the presence of 0.0054 PPM of cobalt in our filtered water** (it hadn’t been detected pre-filtration).\n\n[![Made with Flourish](data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C\/svg%3E)![Made with Flourish](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/resources\/made_with_flourish.svg)](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/visualisation\/17080119\/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation\/17080119)\n\nThere were two standout performance features that gave Clearly Filtered the edge over Epic: its WQA performance certifications and its high-quality plastic design.\n\nThe pitcher has been certified (to NSF Standards [42](https:\/\/find.wqa.org\/find-products\/ctl\/detail\/mid\/1054\/cid\/clearly_filtered_inc\/sid\/1?keyword=clearly+filtered) and [53](https:\/\/find.wqa.org\/find-products\/ctl\/detail\/mid\/1054\/cid\/clearly_filtered_inc\/sid\/3?keyword=clearly+filtered)) to reduce **3 out of the 365+ contaminants it’s claimed to reduce,** so it’s not the most impressive proof of performance that we’ve seen, but it’s still more reassuring than nothing.\n\n![Clearly filtered pitcher parts](data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%20800%20520'%3E%3C\/svg%3E)\n\n![Clearly filtered pitcher parts](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Clearly-Filtered-pitcher-parts.jpg)\n\nAs for design, the Clearly Filtered pitcher got a score of 9.70. The pitcher is made from BPA-free Tritan plastic and is [WQA certified for lead-free design](https:\/\/find.wqa.org\/find-products\/ctl\/detail\/mid\/1054\/cid\/clearly_filtered_inc\/sid\/29?keyword=clearly+filtered), on top of holding a materials safety certification as a component of its performance certifications.\n\nWe timed the filtration process and recorded that the **CF pitcher filtered 0.5 gallons of water in 13 minutes and 12 seconds**, giving it a 2.27 GPH filtration rate. This put it slightly ahead of the Epic Pure, which had a 2.23 GPH filtration rate – but both filters got the top score here.\n\nWe think the Clearly Filtered Pitcher makes the most sense for people who are happy to pay a slightly higher upfront and ongoing cost to effectively address many contaminants in their water with a system that’s **certified for performance and materials safety**.\n\n| Criteria | Results |\n|---|---|\n| Overall Score | 8\\.78 |\n| Health Related Contaminants | 8\\.30 |\n| Aesthetic Related Contaminants | 9\\.90 |\n| Performance Certification | Certified for \\<1% of reduction claims |\n| Filtration Rate | 2\\.27 GPH |\n| Component Quality | Outstanding |\n| Component Certification | Certified |\n| Setup | Outstanding |\n| Servicing Requirements | Outstanding |\n| Costs | \\$0.55\/ gallon |\n| Warranty Length | 1 year |\n| Shipping | Free shipping |\n| Returns | 30 days |\n\n## Santevia MINA Pitcher\n![Santevia MINA Alkaline Pitcher](data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%201024%20983'%3E%3C\/svg%3E)\n\n![Santevia MINA Alkaline Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/Santevia-MINA-Alkaline-Pitcher-1024x983.jpg)\n\nThe Santevia MINA Pitcher is the only alkalizing water filter pitcher to make our list. It did a great job of reducing many contaminants in our water, and we were impressed with its ability to **raise water pH by up to 2.0** (although our own results varied – more on that later).\n\nOverall Score: 8.45\n\nHow We Test & Score\n\n8\\.12 Contaminant Reduction\n\n8\\.10 Design\n\n9\\.75 Maintenance\n\n8\\.50 Filtration Rate\n\n9\\.50 Setup\n\n7\\.95 Company\n\n### Best For\nReducing contaminants *and* increasing water’s alkalinity & pH\n\nBudget-friendly – costs less than \\$50 upfront\n\nEasy to maintain\n### Product Specs\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Price | \\$49.99 |\n| Contaminants Reduced | 85 |\n| Certifications | Not certified |\n| Process | Carbon + Ion Exchange + Remineralization |\n| Filter Capacity | 80 gallons |\n| Annual Cost | ~\\$120 |\n| Warranty | 90 days |\n### Why We Liked It\nThe [**Santevia MINA**](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/santevia-mina-review\/) was the best alkalizing water filter pitcher we tested, being the only filter to reduce healthy contaminants *and* increase the pH and alkalinity of water.\n\nIt’s also the most affordable of all the pitchers we’ve mentioned in this guide so far, falling within the \\$0-\\$50 price bracket, and with an ongoing **cost of just \\$0.25\/ gallon** – impressive given that it provides an additional water quality advantage that none of the other systems offer.\n\n[View on Amazon](https:\/\/amzn.to\/4ovBxli)\n### Santevia MINA Performance\nThe Santevia MINA pitcher’s overall contaminant reduction score was 8.12, putting it only slightly behind Clearly Filtered and Epic Pure. It **reduced 7 contaminants in our water**: 100% chlorine, uranium, molybdenum, and copper, 78% barium, 77% nitrate, and 72% strontium.\n\n[![Made with Flourish](data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C\/svg%3E)![Made with Flourish](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/resources\/made_with_flourish.svg)](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/visualisation\/16832087\/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation\/16832087)\n\nHowever, the MINA pitcher isn’t performance-certified, which affected its overall score in this category. Plus, **fluoride actually increased slightly from 1.1 PPM to 1.2 PPM**, telling us that the filter doesn’t effectively address this contaminant.\n\n[![Made with Flourish](data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C\/svg%3E)![Made with Flourish](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/resources\/made_with_flourish.svg)](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/visualisation\/16832109\/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation\/16832109)\n\nSantevia’s main selling point is its ability to increase the alkalinity of water, which has a [few possible health benefits](https:\/\/www.mayoclinic.org\/healthy-lifestyle\/nutrition-and-healthy-eating\/expert-answers\/alkaline-water\/faq-20058029). When we first got the pitcher, we used a pH meter to test our water. **The unfiltered water had a 7.89 pH, and our filtered water’s pH had increased to 9.94. However, when we tested the pitcher later with a lab test, pH only increased by 0.1, from 7.4 to 7.5.**\n\n![Testing the pH level of water after filtration with Santevia MINA Alkaline Pitcher](data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%20800%20520'%3E%3C\/svg%3E)\n\n![Testing the pH level of water after filtration with Santevia MINA Alkaline Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Testing-the-pH-level-of-water-after-filtration-with-Santevia-MINA-Alkaline-Pitcher.jpg)\n\n[![Made with Flourish](data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C\/svg%3E)![Made with Flourish](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/resources\/made_with_flourish.svg)](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/visualisation\/17090369\/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation\/17090369)\n\nThe system got an 8.50 score from us for its filtration rate. **It filtered 0.383 gallons of water in just over 16 minutes**, giving it a filtration rate of 1.43 GPH – around 1 GPM slower than most other pitchers we tested.\n\nWe couldn’t fault the filter setup process. It also got a 9.50 in this category because **assembly took less than 5 minutes** – we just had to wash and assemble the pitcher, then hold the filter under running water for 1 minute until the water ran clear.\n\nWe think the Santevia MINA pitcher is a great fit for folks who want to go a step further than simply reducing contaminants in their water, and anyone who wants the possible taste and health benefits of filtered water with an alkaline pH.\n\n| Criteria | Results |\n|---|---|\n| Overall Score | 8\\.45 |\n| Health Related Contaminants | 8\\.30 |\n| Aesthetic Related Contaminants | 9\\.50 |\n| Performance Certification | Not certified |\n| Filtration Rate | 1\\.43 GPH |\n| Component Quality | Outstanding |\n| Component Certification | Not certified |\n| Setup | Outstanding |\n| Servicing Requirements | Outstanding |\n| Costs | \\$0.25\/ gallon |\n| Warranty Length | 90 days |\n| Shipping | Free shipping on orders over \\$99, except Hawaii, Puerto Rico & Alaska |\n| Returns | 30 days |\n\n## LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced Pitcher\n![LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced Pitcher](data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%20400%20400'%3E%3C\/svg%3E)\n\n![LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/LARQ-Pure-Vis-Advanced-Pitcher.png)\n\nThe LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced Pitcher filters and purifies water with a unique 2-stage process involving a **filter cartridge and a UV wand**. It reduced numerous contaminants in our testing, and we thought it had the most attractive design of all the water filter pitchers we tested.\n\nOverall Score: 8.21\n\nHow We Test & Score\n\n8\\.14 Contaminant Reduction\n\n8\\.10 Design\n\n9\\.00 Maintenance\n\n7\\.00 Filtration Rate\n\n9\\.00 Setup\n\n8\\.35 Company\n\n### Best For\nPrevents bacteria growth with UV disinfection\n\nAttractive, quality design\n\nEasy assembly and maintenance\n\nThe only high-tech pitcher we reviewed\n### Product Specs\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Price | \\$139.00 |\n| Contaminants Reduced | 60+ |\n| Certifications | Not Certified |\n| Process | Activated Carbon + UV Purification |\n| Filter Capacity | 60 gallons |\n| Annual Cost | ~\\$150 |\n| Warranty | 1 year |\n### Our Take\nThe **LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced Pitcher** is the most expensive water filter pitcher we’ve tried, but it’s the only pitcher with a unique UV purification stage to prevent bacterial growth in the filtered water chamber.\n\nThe pitcher’s filtration performance wasn’t far off Clearly Filtered’s – it got the same score in our lab testing, but it doesn’t have a performance certification.\n\n[See price on Amazon](https:\/\/amzn.to\/3TEXHV7)\n### LARQ Pure-Vis Performance\nWe awarded the LARQ Pure-Vis pitcher an 8.14 for contaminant reduction. It did a great job of removing 100% uranium, barium, strontium, and molybdenum, and reducing 97% copper, 88% sulfate, and 20% nitrate. **Unfortunately, it didn’t reduce fluoride in our water at all**.\n\n[![Made with Flourish](data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C\/svg%3E)![Made with Flourish](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/resources\/made_with_flourish.svg)](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/visualisation\/17078952\/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation\/17078952)\n\n[![Made with Flourish](data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C\/svg%3E)![Made with Flourish](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/resources\/made_with_flourish.svg)](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/visualisation\/17078910\/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation\/17078910)\n\nThe Pure-Vis pitcher’s UV purification stage is the biggest reason why we were drawn to the system. Microorganisms aren’t present in treated city water, but a number of studies (including [this study on Brita water filter pitchers](https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/8740859\/)) have found that microorganisms can grow in filter media. The LARQ pitcher provides protection against bacteria growth in the filter media and the pitcher chamber, so we didn’t have to wash it out as often as the other pitchers.\n\nThe system did well in the setup and maintenance categories, with scores of 9.00 in each. Setup was a *bit* more involved – we had to **soak the filter for 10 minutes before installing it**, charge the battery pack for the UV wand, and install the app. Maintenance required the same filter soaking and UV wand charging (but the battery lasts around 1 month on a full charge).\n\nWe estimated the filter’s ongoing cost as \\$0.54\/ gallon, so it’s about on par with the Clearly Filtered pitcher – not the cheapest, but not as costly as Culligan ZeroWater.\n\nAs for design, the LARQ pitcher felt like it was made from the same high-quality materials as Clearly Filtered. It felt thick, solid, and durable, and more capable of withstanding long-term use than the other pitchers we tested.\n\n![LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced pitcher components](data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%20800%20520'%3E%3C\/svg%3E)\n\n![LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced pitcher components](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/LARQ-Pure-Vis-Advanced-pitcher-components.jpg)\n\nIn our opinion, the LARQ Pure-Vis pitcher is ideal for anyone who has concerns about biofilm growth and microorganisms in their filter media and the pitcher vessel itself, and folks who want the reassurance of filtering and purifying their water at the same time.\n\n| Criteria | Results |\n|---|---|\n| Overall Score | 8\\.21 |\n| Health Related Contaminants | 8\\.30 |\n| Aesthetic Related Contaminants | 9\\.90 |\n| Performance Certification | Not Certified |\n| Filtration Rate | 0\\.60 GPH |\n| Component Quality | Outstanding |\n| Component Certification | Not Certified |\n| Setup | Excellent |\n| Servicing Requirements | Exceptional |\n| Costs | \\$0.54\/ gallon |\n| Warranty Length | 1 year |\n| Shipping | Free on orders over \\$80 within the contiguous US |\n| Returns | 30 days, but only if unopened |\n## Filters That Didn’t Make the Cut\nWe want to close off this review with a quick mention of the other three pitchers we tested, which received lower performance scores than the rest and therefore didn’t make the cut.\n\nThese were:\n\n- [The PUR Plus Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/pur-water-filter-pitcher-review\/)\n- [The Brita Elite Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/brita-elite-water-filter-pitcher-review\/)\n- [The Waterdrop Chubby Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/waterdrop-chubby-review\/)\n\nThese filters all got poorer contaminant reduction scores: the PUR Plus got 5.28; the Brita Elite got 4.29; and the Waterdrop Chubby got 4.24.\n\nNone of the pitchers are tested or certified to reduce most of the contaminants (like uranium, fluoride, and molybdenum) in our water. So we were unsurprised when the pitchers did a poor job of reducing these contaminants.\n\nOur testing outcomes don’t necessarily mean that the filters are incapable of reducing contaminants; **just that they couldn’t address our own water quality concerns**. If we’d tested the filters with water predominantly containing contaminants they *could* address, the contaminant reduction scores would likely have been higher.\n\n**That’s why testing your water before buying a filter is so important: you want to ensure that the system you choose can effectively address your unique water quality issues.**\n\n- ![Brian Campbell headshot](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/brian-headshot.jpg)\n  [Brian Campbell](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/author\/brian\/ \"Brian Campbell\")\n  \n  President & CEO, CWS, CWR\n  \n  Brian Campbell, a WQA Certified Water Specialist (CWS) and Certified Water Treatment Representative (CWR) with 5+ years of experience, helps homeowners navigate the world of water treatment. After honing his skills at Hach Company, he founded his business to empower homeowners with the knowledge and tools to achieve safe, healthy water. Brian's tested countless devices, from simple pitchers to complex systems, helping his readers find the perfect fit for their unique needs.\n\n### 44 thoughts on “The 5 Best Water Filter Pitchers, According to Our Testing”\n1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/34ebba1c560b8942e79b9d366a4c15074055719800feeddcb6f7a22649b728b4?s=50&d=mm&r=g)\n   \n   **Julie Soucy**\n   \n   [March 7, 2026 at 4:27 pm](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-9179)\n   \n   Do they filter the hormones or antibiotics that may remains in the water?\n   \n   [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-9179)\n   1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/brian-headshot.jpg)\n      \n      **Brian Campbell**\n      \n      [March 16, 2026 at 3:34 pm](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-9191)\n      \n      Depends on the filter. Those that use activated carbon should be able to reduce trace personal care and pharmaceutical products (PCPPs). Even better, find a system certified for the reduction of hormones like estrone like the [Culligan ZeroWater](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/go\/culligan-zerowater-pitcher)\n      \n      [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-9191)\n2. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4d651ec08572c46d56d1f323d5fa6c853c828e0dbc8f96a6aacf8d89bcc336eb?s=50&d=mm&r=g)\n   \n   **Jennings**\n   \n   [January 9, 2026 at 8:09 am](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-9082)\n   \n   Have you tested or do you recommend cyclopure which removes PFAS only?\n   \n   [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-9082)\n   1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/brian-headshot.jpg)\n      \n      **Brian Campbell**\n      \n      [January 10, 2026 at 7:33 am](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-9083)\n      \n      I have not tested it\n      \n      [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-9083)\n3. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b6e2a8525bee949878d5f6a2dffb336ba0a2166cb7a02df1f340e245480567be?s=50&d=mm&r=g)\n   \n   **Sudipto**\n   \n   [September 20, 2025 at 8:48 pm](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-8839)\n   \n   The “Epic Pure” water filter on their site mentions they reduce microplastics by 99%. Is that true? You have mentioned that only “Clearly Filtered” does that? So I am confused.\n   \n   Also what about the material used to manufacture the filter. Are they also made with Tritan for for both “Epic Pure” & “Clearly Filtered”?  \n    Please compare both these water pitcher & filters on the below these 2 counts (since other aspects seem to be dead heat) –  \n    1. Reduction of microplastics  \n    2. Material used to make both the water pitcher and the actual filter\n   \n   Thanks a lot Brain\\!\n   \n   [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-8839)\n   1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/brian-headshot.jpg)\n      \n      **Brian Campbell**\n      \n      [October 1, 2025 at 9:47 am](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-8870)\n      \n      Great question, and I can see why it’s confusing. To clarify, I’ve not specifically tested either pitcher for microplastics yet, so I don’t have any firsthand data for you. Also, neither Epic nor Clearly Filtered has official third-party certification for microplastics reduction. So when you see claims like “99% reduction,” that’s marketing language rather than certification-backed proof. Clearly Filtered has been much more transparent with data and independent testing than Epic.\n      \n      As for the materials: both Epic Pure and Clearly Filtered pitchers use Tritan plastic for the reservoir and housing. Tritan has NSF certifications for food-contact safety (NSF 51) and drinking-water components (NSF 61), which means it’s been tested for extraction of harmful substances. The filters themselves are generally made from a blend of activated carbon and proprietary media encased in plastic housings, also usually Tritan or a similar BPA-free plastic.\n      \n      So, in short: neither has certified proof for microplastics reduction, but both use Tritan plastic in their pitcher construction and filter housings (or so they claim).\n      \n      Thanks a lot for the thoughtful question\\!\n      \n      [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-8870)\n4. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b6e2a8525bee949878d5f6a2dffb336ba0a2166cb7a02df1f340e245480567be?s=50&d=mm&r=g)\n   \n   **Sudipto**\n   \n   [September 20, 2025 at 4:39 pm](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-8838)\n   \n   Hi Brian –  \n    First of all a HUGE vote of THANKS for publishing such valuable information on water filters. Really kudos to you\\!\n   \n   Now my questions & situation – First a very basic dumb question. Since piped municipal water (which I get in my home) is already treated by the local water company why do we at all need water filters? I have the water quality report (<https:\/\/delcowater.org\/waterquality\/>) of my local water company & all substances are in the recommended range. The only thing which I feel we should worry about in general is the contaminants coming from the water pipe (lead, etc) & micro-plastics in general. Please correct me if I am wrong.\n   \n   Anyway pending a decision I am relying on bottled spring water. I am on the lookout for a counter top water filter pitcher. From the Top-3 you have posted, all seem to be doing an equally good job contaminant reduction though traces of Cobalt & Chloroform reduced the scores of two of the filters. But what about only the “Health-Related” contaminants – are all 3 similar? What about PFA reduction by these 3.\n   \n   Of these 3, my choice would be “Clearly Filtered Pitcher” because – A. The material of the jug seems to be superior to others (BPA & BPAs free). After all no use of having a great filtered water but lying in a plastic jug potentially leaching microplastics (?). B. Somewhere you mentioned that this one reduces microplastics though that is not mentioned anywhere. Why do you say that as that is one of my top concerns. (You also mentioned PUR Plus does that, but seems that filter did not pass your basic tests).\n   \n   I am also tempted to consider Epic Pure pitcher instead if you so advise. AMAZON Reviews for Epic Pure are higher than “Clearly Filtered Pitcher”, though the medical grade material of the latter seems to be a winner in my view. Please advise.\n   \n   Looking forward to hearing from you…\n   \n   [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-8838)\n   1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/brian-headshot.jpg)\n      \n      **Brian Campbell**\n      \n      [October 1, 2025 at 9:57 am](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-8871)\n      \n      Appreciate the kind words thank you! On your first question: utilities are required to meet **legally enforceable** maximum contaminant levels (MCLs), but those limits are set by balancing treatment cost and feasibility with health risk, so they don’t always reflect the most conservative, health-first targets. Not every contaminant is regulated, either. Examples include things like many pharmaceuticals, 1,4-dioxane in some jurisdictions, and microplastics so even if your report shows everything “in range,” there can still be gaps. And water can be **recontaminated** after it leaves the plant as it moves through mains and your home’s plumbing (lead, copper, and particulate rust are classic distribution-system issues). From a residential treatment perspective, I prefer to reference the most conservative health-based guidelines when interpreting reports, not just the federal MCLs.\n      \n      Regarding PFAS and pitchers: in general, any high-quality carbon media with enough contact time \\*can\\* reduce PFAS, but I don’t have firsthand lab data for every pitcher on your shortlist. One important update: Clearly Filtered had been certified by WQA to NSF\/ANSI 53 for PFAS reduction, but just yesterday it was brought to my attention that the certification listing has been removed. I’ve reached out to CF for clarification and will update my content accordingly. In the meantime, treat all marketing around PFAS with cautious optimism and, where possible, look for current, verifiable certifications.\n      \n      Microplastics: I’ve not specifically tested for microplastics yet, so I don’t have any firsthand data for you, and neither of the pitchers you mentioned is certified for microplastics reduction. That said, their fine-pore carbon blocks should capture a portion of larger particles; the open question is how they perform across the full size range found in real tap water. If microplastics are your top concern, that’s another reason certifications matter.\n      \n      Material safety: BPA\/BPS-free claims are good, but what I care about most is extraction\/material-safety testing as part of reputable certifications (this is where standards ensure the plastics aren’t leaching concerning levels of anything into the water). Clearly Filtered’s pitcher and filter components have historically aligned with those material-safety expectations, and in my testing their overall contaminant reduction was strong. Still, remember that *my testing* is limited and not conclusive; what worked well in my source water may not behave the same in yours. For example, PUR struggled with the naturally occurring fluoride level in my water so performance is very water-dependent.\n      \n      I hope this helps\n      \n      [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-8871)\n5. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d1d0c3498b4849b3ec402b282c01a3120066c13ff33cb3d21d71ad9c4e7e254b?s=50&d=mm&r=g)\n   \n   **m.b.**\n   \n   [September 16, 2025 at 3:07 pm](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-8831)\n   \n   Are there any glass water filter pitchers that you’d recommend?  \n    thanks\\!\n   \n   [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-8831)\n   1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/brian-headshot.jpg)\n      \n      **Brian Campbell**\n      \n      [September 17, 2025 at 7:02 am](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-8832)\n      \n      None that I’ve tested yet.\n      \n      [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-8832)\n6. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bb687f16ae08500c0d8c6cc1f5187a77073da86eeed6f00843f1a6f703998fb0?s=50&d=mm&r=g)\n   \n   **James**\n   \n   [September 12, 2025 at 7:45 pm](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-8823)\n   \n   It’s a shame that none of them were the rectangle ones with a spigot; that’s the sort I’m looking to get.\n   \n   [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-8823)\n   1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/brian-headshot.jpg)\n      \n      **Brian Campbell**\n      \n      [September 15, 2025 at 8:28 am](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-8825)\n      \n      That’s just a different vessel – the filter elements are the same. For example the [Epic Pure Dispenser](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/go\/epic-pure-dispenser) and the [ZeroWater dispenser](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/go\/zerowater-32-cup-dispenser) use the same filter elements as the pitcher versions.\n      \n      [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-8825)\n7. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/aad88edf0db7e4355538c93d312af8346321dcbe9ca2405fa521dd2219b5a3a4?s=50&d=mm&r=g)\n   \n   **Lisa**\n   \n   [August 2, 2025 at 6:41 am](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-8259)\n   \n   Brian,  \n    Have you tested\/reviewed the LifeStraw filter pitcher? It has a glass vessel but a silicon filter.  \n    Trying to determine the safety of this. Thank you\n   \n   [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-8259)\n   1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/brian-headshot.jpg)\n      \n      **Brian Campbell**\n      \n      [August 2, 2025 at 8:18 am](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-8261)\n      \n      Not yet but it’s on my list for next time I test pitchers\n      \n      [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-8261)\n8. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/21c9b284b8d17cf4ac52a386c5dd759f41108e9fb9a7ef5527504b63e4f963ce?s=50&d=mm&r=g)\n   \n   **M**\n   \n   [May 2, 2025 at 10:03 am](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-7392)\n   \n   You did so much work looking at all these products, but they’re ALL MADE OF PLASTIC. So you filter the water and then let it sit in a plastic container. And BPA-free doesn’t mean a whole lot. When companies stopped using BPA, they switched it up a little (BPS, etc) and called it “BPA-free.” More and more evidence comes out about how toxic plastic is in general–ingesting (or breathing in) microplastics and nanoplastics. If that isn’t on your radar now, it will be soon.\n   \n   Do you have any reviews of glass (or stainless?) pitcher-style or other counter-top water filters that don’t contain plastic? Thanks.\n   \n   [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-7392)\n   1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/brian-headshot.jpg)\n      \n      **Brian Campbell**\n      \n      [May 14, 2025 at 5:00 pm](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-7474)\n      \n      Not yet. Unfortunately, currently, the vast majority of water filters use plastic components. If not the pitcher vessel itself, the filter is still housed in plastic. Your best bet to completely avoid plastic exposure would be distillation into a glass vessel.\n      \n      [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-7474)\n9. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/621fe45ed5cae7559bb059163e1cb912439c6b78ae27ff2b01877c09fcedd65f?s=50&d=mm&r=g)\n   \n   **Julliette**\n   \n   [April 6, 2025 at 9:30 am](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-7247)\n   \n   Thanks for your testing.  \n    As a single person with a small refrigerator, I’d like a narrow pitcher, less than 3 inches. Since 33% of Americans are single-person households, I doubt my need is unusual. I don’t suppose you’ve come across any good pitchers that are smaller?\n   \n   [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-7247)\n   1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/brian-headshot.jpg)\n      \n      **Brian Campbell**\n      \n      [April 16, 2025 at 2:21 pm](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-7324)\n      \n      The best I’ve found are featured in this article. When I test more I’ll update here accordingly. [PUR has a small 7 cup pitcher](https:\/\/amzn.to\/49R9xAI)\n      \n      [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-7324)\n10. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dd6933cdfdb70f11e2dac1a206c8f51614a5482648c86c50e5ac7208f019f076?s=50&d=mm&r=g)\n    \n    **Brian**\n    \n    [January 27, 2025 at 8:05 pm](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-6836)\n    \n    The ZeroWater Ready-Pour Pitcher link listed only links to a 5 stage filter, but you mention a 6 stage filter. Why the discrepancy, or a typo?\n    \n    [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-6836)\n    1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/brian-headshot.jpg)\n       \n       **Brian Campbell**\n       \n       [January 31, 2025 at 12:26 pm](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-6853)\n       \n       That would be a typo on our end, thanks for the heads up! This has been corrected. ZeroWater is a 5-stage filter\n       \n       [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-6853)\n11. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/70e890953a7439439f0c827568b344b3dc4bb631ab58c02767a0f67a7a1570c8?s=50&d=mm&r=g)\n    \n    **Tony**\n    \n    [January 10, 2025 at 7:24 pm](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-6762)\n    \n    Didn’t LARQ do a 3rd-party lab test of their water pitcher somewhere in 2021? It’s on their website, and here’s the direct link to their performance report. I heard they tested it to NSF\/ANSI 42, 53 & 401 standards.\n    \n    [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-6762)\n    1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/brian-headshot.jpg)\n       \n       **Brian Campbell**\n       \n       [January 20, 2025 at 1:19 pm](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-6803)\n       \n       While third party testing is a great first step, it’s good to note that third party testing and official performance certifications are not the same thing\\!\n       \n       [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-6803)\n12. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7b85317285cf9ec02aa154386ddaf6fccd2caebc460dd8c4900a546d132d0faa?s=50&d=mm&r=g)\n    \n    **Shiloh**\n    \n    [December 27, 2024 at 7:02 pm](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-6675)\n    \n    Have you ever tested the “best water filter ever” from the wellness enterprise? I am curious how it stacks up to the rest of the filters that were reviewed.\n    \n    [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-6675)\n    1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/brian-headshot.jpg)\n       \n       **Brian Campbell**\n       \n       [January 5, 2025 at 9:02 am](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-6729)\n       \n       I’ve not, but I can add it to my list to look into\\!\n       \n       [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-6729)\n13. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/46bc0db5385708840a25c6db1aa0429bc222dab1c64f98c7229eb64122704004?s=50&d=mm&r=g)\n    \n    **David**\n    \n    [November 1, 2024 at 3:02 pm](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-6386)\n    \n    Hi. Has Epic Pure solved its premature filter failure problem? (Read the reviews on Amazon; many people are complaining about this, I worry when any product gets 23% negative reviews. )\n    \n    [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-6386)\n    1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/brian-headshot.jpg)\n       \n       **Brian Campbell**\n       \n       [November 2, 2024 at 3:41 pm](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-6396)\n       \n       Premature filter failure? Filter lifespan is dependent on multiple factors and will be different from situation to situation. Type and concentration of contaminants present and usage directly affect how fast a filter will reach capacity and need to be replaced. The more contaminated the water, the shorter the filter lifespan.\n       \n       [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-6396)\n       1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/46bc0db5385708840a25c6db1aa0429bc222dab1c64f98c7229eb64122704004?s=50&d=mm&r=g)\n          \n          **David**\n          \n          [November 2, 2024 at 7:55 pm](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-6401)\n          \n          I understand that but some are complaining it happens very quickly, sometimes within days or a couple of weeks. Read the 1-3 star reviews on Amazon and let me know what you think. Thanks\\!\n          \n          [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-6401)\n          1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/brian-headshot.jpg)\n             \n             **Brian Campbell**\n             \n             [November 4, 2024 at 12:01 pm](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-6409)\n             \n             I can’t really speak to the experience those folks have had as I don’t have information or data about their situation and how they’ve used the filter. I’m always wary of reviews on Amazon as their review system is so easily manipulated too.\n             \n             [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-6409)\n             1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b06157515b0aa0b86ebdc56be3cc46d1688860c1da8524ace0c5c3945361ecbb?s=50&d=mm&r=g)\n                \n                **anna**\n                \n                [December 19, 2024 at 9:05 pm](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-6635)\n                \n                hi, i also experienced filter slow down within days (2 filters bought on amazon), we use the nano as we have well water. We leave plenty of time for the filtration to complete, like overnight. And I also noticed the filtration rate varies and will speed up after having slowing down in first couple days.\n14. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e1a126a38bb665c1aa4063f9d89de073c315f1ba9bfc8a52a2c82fb975b0a714?s=50&d=mm&r=g)\n    \n    **Rupert**\n    \n    [September 27, 2024 at 2:30 pm](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-6063)\n    \n    Does the TDS included w\/ the Zero Water Filter System measure the safety of the water? Could it test at 0 but still have toxic levels of lead, etc?\n    \n    [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-6063)\n    1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/brian-headshot.jpg)\n       \n       **Brian Campbell**\n       \n       [September 29, 2024 at 8:03 am](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-6070)\n       \n       No, a TDS meter does not tell you if water is healthy or safe or not. It measures the total dissolved solids, which includes both healthy minerals (like calcium and magnesium) as well as more dangerous contaminants like metals. Additionally, a TDS meter does not provide any information about uncharged contaminants, like some pesticides, herbicides and PFAs. The best way to find out what’s in your water and determine it’s safety is by [testing with a certified lab](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/go\/tap-score-tests).\n       \n       [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-6070)\n15. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/62c84b9df08cb314d33536233548652781058c55b62e4dfe7298ab9d8d525511?s=50&d=mm&r=g)\n    \n    **Mignone**\n    \n    [August 3, 2024 at 4:05 pm](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-5519)\n    \n    I tested my tap water through Tap Score. Our water utility gets our water from Lake Tahoe. The test results are OK so far except for HAA5 specifically DCA: Dichloroacetic Acid is elevated: 0.0025 PPM. I am looking for both a water filter pitcher and an undercounter filter (I currently have InSink Erator F-3000) that will remove or lower to a healthy level the DCA. Any suggestions?\n    \n    [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-5519)\n    1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/brian-headshot.jpg)\n       \n       **Brian Campbell**\n       \n       [August 3, 2024 at 4:23 pm](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-5520)\n       \n       Activated carbon is an effective method to reduce Dichloroacetic Acid, so any water filter that uses activated carbon media should do a good job addressing this for you\n       \n       [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-5520)\n    2. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/62c84b9df08cb314d33536233548652781058c55b62e4dfe7298ab9d8d525511?s=50&d=mm&r=g)\n       \n       **Mignone**\n       \n       [August 4, 2024 at 2:00 pm](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-5527)\n       \n       Our VOC water tests also indicated an elevated level of: Total THMs at 2.96 and Chloroform at 2.96 (HGL 0.22). So we’d like to add that to the list of what we want to filter out of our drinking water. We do have elevated: uranium, Lead and Arsenic; but I think most filters can lower these contaminants.  \n        We look forward to hearing from you. We are especially concerned about the Chloroform level as we have regular visitors who are 3 years old and 5 months old….\n       \n       [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-5527)\n16. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/74b72b0b231d873461c53091aeff72fb129877b7323631a77c2a77792d241b46?s=50&d=mm&r=g)\n    \n    **Sergi**\n    \n    [April 21, 2024 at 2:48 pm](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-4474)\n    \n    Excellent comparison and very useful. Isn’t it worrying that filter jugs like EPIC PURE, Santevia MINA or LARQ increase sulfate or chloride levels after the filtering process? Does this pose any security risk? I am surprised that EPIC PURE is in position 1 in the ranking, considering this data\n    \n    [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-4474)\n    1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/brian-headshot.jpg)\n       \n       **Brian Campbell**\n       \n       [April 22, 2024 at 7:23 am](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-4479)\n       \n       Hey Sergi, thanks for the comment! While we observed slight increases in the impurities mentioned, the levels were well below the Health Guideline Level benchmark, so we did not consider them too much of a concern.\n       \n       [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-4479)\n17. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/f58eba870e467953b6b91e140fbef2e278240f0fb90bc0d038e066438db31c89?s=50&d=mm&r=g)\n    \n    **Barbara Ondricko**\n    \n    [April 10, 2024 at 12:18 pm](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-4375)\n    \n    I live in Windsor Ontario Canada and our water is currently disinfected using ozonation . I am looking to upgrade from the Pur Plus system and I am particularly concerned about plastic microcontaminants that ozonation does not address. I am only interested in a water pitcher system . Thankyou for your time.\n    \n    [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-4375)\n    1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/brian-headshot.jpg)\n       \n       **Brian Campbell**\n       \n       [April 11, 2024 at 8:36 am](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-4379)\n       \n       Hey Barbara, [the Clearly Filtered water pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/go\/clearly-filtered-pitcher) performed well in our testing and has been tested to reduce microplastics, but it’s not yet certified to do so. If you are looking for a pitcher thats specifically certified to reduce microplastics, [check out the PUR Plus](https:\/\/amzn.to\/49SFrgF).\n       \n       [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-4379)\n18. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7c90b61a3ba38db04b7cc79e923c984bbfaedb5adf1d8e373733a9dbebeb9a0c?s=50&d=mm&r=g)\n    \n    **richard**\n    \n    [April 5, 2024 at 1:20 am](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-4348)\n    \n    Please help me understand why the Zero water was rated \\#3 when it removed almost 100% of everything that it was being tested for and the con was only that it had a expensive filter. It seems like that is the best filter hands down amongst the 5 filters.\n    \n    [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-4348)\n    1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/brian-headshot.jpg)\n       \n       **Brian Campbell**\n       \n       [April 6, 2024 at 8:26 am](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-4357)\n       \n       The ZeroWater received an 8.62\/10 when put through [our data-driven scoring system](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/how-we-test-water-filters\/). It’s overall contaminant reduction score (8.34) was dragged down due to the presence of disinfection byproducts in the filtered water. The overall score was greatly impacted by this because Contaminant Reduction is given the highest weight, and makes up 55% of the total score. It’s maintenance score of 8.25 was also lowered due to the expensive ongoing filter replacement cost of \\$0.70\/ gallon. The Company score was also lowered due to a lack of return window. Y[ou can read the full ZeroWater review here](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/zerowater-review\/) where we dive deep into the data behind each of the scores.\n       \n       [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-4357)\n19. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3731ceddae57603f15ef9e6338d5a439184873912aa8ed5f8abde53487eccd6b?s=50&d=mm&r=g)\n    \n    **Dave B**\n    \n    [January 21, 2024 at 7:40 pm](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-2277)\n    \n    Is the PUR Plus the only one certified to reduce arsenic?\n    \n    [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-2277)\n    1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/brian-headshot.jpg)\n       \n       **Brian Campbell**\n       \n       [January 22, 2024 at 2:50 pm](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-2363)\n       \n       The PUR Plus is not certified to reduce arsenic. I’m not aware of any pitchers that are certified to reduce arsenic, only that have been 3rd party tested to do so\n       \n       [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-2363)\n    2. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7f9a78baaa00f833d81b4cd31f172c7979d8a181b21b020c34c1fcf8902d1430?s=50&d=mm&r=g)\n       \n       **Jack**\n       \n       [December 11, 2024 at 5:12 pm](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-6592)\n       \n       Is the chloroform found in Zero Water a big deal ? I use Zero Water but am now concerned.\n       \n       [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-6592)\n       1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/brian-headshot.jpg)\n          \n          **Brian Campbell**\n          \n          [December 17, 2024 at 11:11 am](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-6621)\n          \n          I don’t think the chloroform, a disinfection byproduct, is coming from the ZeroWater filter itself. Still, the fact it was detected post-filtration indicates ZeroWater may not be the best option for addressing THMs like chloroform\n          \n          [Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#comment-6621)\n#### Leave a Comment [Cancel Reply](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#respond)\n\n[![WaterFilterGuru.com](data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%201024%20217'%3E%3C\/svg%3E)![WaterFilterGuru.com](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/Logo_medium_white-1024x217.png)](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/)\n\n600 17th Street Suite 2890 South  \nDenver, CO 80202\n\n### ABOUT\n- [About Us](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/about-us\/ \"About Us\")\n- [Review Process](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/editorial-guidelines\/#our-methodology)\n- [How We Test Water Filters](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/how-we-test-water-filters\/)\n- [Privacy Policy](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/privacy-policy\/ \"Privacy Policy\")\n- [Affiliate Disclosure](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/disclaimer\/ \"Affiliate Disclosure\")\n- [Terms of Service](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/terms-of-service\/)\n- [Accessibility Statement](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/accessibility\/)\n- [Contact Us](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/contact-us\/ \"Contact Us\")\n\n![WQA member logo](data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%20208%2077'%3E%3C\/svg%3E)\n\n![WQA member logo](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/10\/WQALogo.member.horizwhite.png)\n\n[![DMCA.com Protection Status](data:image\/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%20100%2020'%3E%3C\/svg%3E)![DMCA.com Protection Status](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/dmca-badge-w100-5x1-08.png)](https:\/\/www.dmca.com\/Protection\/Status.aspx?ID=99e4ce09-7fb9-4a66-b840-f231408adcf1 \"DMCA.com Protection Status\")\n\nCOPYRIGHT © 2022 WaterFilterGuru.com \\| All Rights Reserved. waterfilterguru.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com, amazon.co.uk or amazon.ca. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.\n\nProduct name, logo, brands, and other registered trademarks featured or referred to within WaterFilterGuru.com are the property of their respective trademark holders.\n\n![](https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/tr?id=199029834534140&ev=PageView&noscript=1)\n\nx\n\nx\n\nx\n\nx\n\nx\n\nScroll to Top","attrs_readable_markdown":"The **best water filter pitchers** are affordable, portable, and reduce dozens of contaminants using gravity-fed water filtration.\n\nWe use our own evidence-based testing to review and compare water filters.\n\nI’ve personally tested all the water filters on this list, leveraging my experience as a WQA Certified Water Specialist (CWS) and Certified Water Treatment Representative (CWR) to review each product as both an expert and a customer.\n\n![Culligan ZeroWater pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Culligan-ZeroWater.jpg)\n\nOverall Score: 9.33\n\nCulligan ZeroWater\n\nBest contaminant reduction performance\n\nMost extensively certified\n\nBest value for money\n\nEasy to set up, no filter priming needed\n\n![Epic Pure Water Filter Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Epic-Pure-Water-Filter-Pitcher.jpg)\n\nOverall Score: 8.90\n\nEpic Pure Pitcher\n\nSecond highest score for contaminant reduction\n\nBest value for money\n\nEasy to set up, no filter priming needed\n\nAffordable ongoing cost\n\n![Clearly Filtered Water Pitcher (400x400)](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Clearly-Filtered-Water-Pitcher-400x400-1.jpg)\n\nOverall Score: 8.78\n\nClearly Filtered Water Pitcher\n\nReduced the most contaminants in our lab tests\n\nHighest quality design materials\n\nCertified for performance & materials safety\n\nReduced 100% fluoride\n\nTable of Contents\n\n- [Our Testing & Selection Process](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#Our_Testing_Selection_Process)\n- [The 5 Best Water Filter Pitchers](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#The_5_Best_Water_Filter_Pitchers)\n- [Culligan ZeroWater](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#Culligan_ZeroWater)\n- [Epic Pure Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#Epic_Pure_Pitcher)\n- [Clearly Filtered Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#Clearly_Filtered_Pitcher)\n- [Santevia MINA Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#Santevia_MINA_Pitcher)\n- [LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#LARQ_Pure-Vis_Advanced_Pitcher)\n- [Filters That Didn’t Make the Cut](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews\/#Filters_That_Didnt_Make_the_Cut)\n## Our Testing & Selection Process\nHow We Test & Score\n\nWe use a metrics-driven process to test water filters for their performance. Our aim is to evaluate a system’s performance capabilities, value for money, and suitability for a specific situation or intended outcome.\n\nFor our Best Water Filter Pitchers guide, we cherry-picked the filters that obtained the highest scores across each of our scoring categories, **with a particular focus on contaminant reduction.**\n\n![scoring factors pie chart](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/scoring-factors-1024x666.png)\n\nWe scored these pitchers based on how effectively they reduced contaminants in our water, what we thought about their design quality, their ease of setup and maintenance, and more. We also compared filter materials and technologies, and evaluated third-party lab test results when the manufacturer provided them, though these are not scoring factors.\n\nTo ensure the fairest comparisons, we use fact-based, numerical data whenever we can. But some testing categories require us to conduct our own subjective assessment, giving our personal insight into a specific aspect of a product’s performance.\n\n[You can see our complete testing and scoring process here.](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/how-we-test-water-filters\/)\n\nHow We Choose the Winners\n\nTo choose the best water filter pitchers, we evaluated all the filters we’ve reviewed and compared their testing data side-by-side.\n\nWe selected the highest-scoring products, paying close attention to the filters that reduced the most contaminants in our water.\n\nThe water filter pitchers we’ve recommended each have their own unique filter technologies and produce different outcomes. We aimed to provide enough variety to offer targeted recommendations for specific budgets and situations.\n\nWe automatically excluded some products from this guide, including:\n\n1\\. Countertop dispensers, units that require electricity to operate, and systems that can’t be classed as gravity-fed water filter pitchers.   \n2\\. Filters with availability\/stock issues, or those not available in the USA.  \n3\\. Systems that were unable to match up to their competitors due to poorer contaminant reduction performance, those sold by lesser-known or less trustworthy brands, or those offering poorer value on the whole.\n\nArticle Update History\n\n11\/07\/2025 – Added Culligan ZeroWater, removed Legacy ZeroWater\n\nCulligan ZeroWater\n\n![Culligan ZeroWater](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Culligan-ZeroWater.jpg)\n\nThe Culligan ZeroWater Pitcher is the highest-scoring water filter pitcher we tested, earning an overall weighted score of 9.33. It removed more contaminants than any other water filter pitcher we tested and was **the only product to be certified for 100% of its contaminant reduction claims**. It also has a sturdier, better-quality construction than most other pitchers (with the exception of Clearly Filtered), *but* it did demineralize our water, and it has the highest maintenance cost of all the filters in this list.\n\nOverall Score: 9.33\n\nHow We Test & Score\n\n9\\.65 Contaminant Reduction\n\n9\\.40 Design\n\n8\\.00 Maintenance\n\n9\\.50 Filtration Rate\n\n9\\.50 Setup\n\n7\\.60 Company\n\nBest For\n\nThe only pitcher to remove 100% of all metals, minerals, and inorganics\n\nHigher-quality design than most other pitchers\n\nIAPMO certified for 100% of contaminants claimed to reduce\n\nCertified for materials safety\n\nFast filtration\n\nProduct Specs\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Price | \\$24.99+ |\n| Contaminants Reduced | 25+ |\n| Certifications or Testing | NSF\/ANSI 42, 53, 401 & 372 |\n| Holding Capacity | 7-40 cups |\n| Filter Lifespan | 20 gallons |\n| Approx. Annual Cost | \\$160+ |\n\n****Discount:**** Get 10% off – Click Here for Code\n### Our Lab Tests\nIn our Tap Score testing, the [Culligan ZeroWater Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/culligan-zerowater-review\/) **outperformed all the other water filter pitchers we reviewed, removing 100% of all contaminants with health effects in our water**, including uranium and fluoride, both initially detected in concentrations exceeding the HGL. It also eliminated sulfate, chlorine, nitrate, zinc, copper, strontium, barium, and molybdenum.\n\n[![Made with Flourish](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/resources\/made_with_flourish.svg)](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/visualisation\/26096129\/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation\/26096129)\n\n[![Made with Flourish](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/resources\/made_with_flourish.svg)](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/visualisation\/26096100\/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation\/26096100)\n\n**ZeroWater filters use a dual ion exchange process, which greatly reduces or removes *all* charged ions.** As a result, we also saw reductions or eliminations of carbonate, calcium, magnesium, bicarbonate, sodium, and hardness. The pH of our water was reduced from 7.6 (slightly alkaline) to 6.6 (slightly acidic), leading to a lower aesthetics score of 8.00. Since a big part of the filter’s marketing is its ability to reduce TDS down to 0, there’s no included remineralization media to mitigate these effects.\n\nOverall, though, the pitcher still earned the highest contaminant reduction score on this list (9.65), partly due to its exceptional health-related contaminant reduction and partly because it’s the only pitcher to have IAPMO certifications to [NSF 42](https:\/\/pld.iapmo.org\/file_info.asp?file_no=0017154), [NSF 53](https:\/\/pld.iapmo.org\/file_info.asp?file_no=0017154), and [NSF 401](https:\/\/pld.iapmo.org\/file_info.asp?file_no=0017156), for every single contaminant that it’s claimed to reduce.\n\n### Other Scoring Factors\n![Culligan ZeroWater Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Culligan-ZeroWater-Pitcher.jpg)\n\nWhen we consider just how thoroughly the Culligan ZeroWater Pitcher filtered our water, its filtration rate of 1.9 GPH (gallons per hour) is pretty impressive. It’s not the fastest filter on this list – Epic Pure, Clearly Filtered, and the legacy ZeroWater were quicker – but it still **took just 7 minutes to filter a full pitcher of water, earning it a score of 9.50.**\n\nWhere Culligan ZeroWater *did* come out on top was in the design category, with a high score of 9.40. Most of the other pitchers we tested had construction issues, with thin, flimsy-feeling plastic. The Culligan ZeroWater pitcher feels sturdy, and it’s **IAPMO certified for materials safety and [lead-free design](https:\/\/pld.iapmo.org\/file_info.asp?file_no=0017157)**. You can choose from several pitcher sizes and capacities, from the smallest 7-cup model to the largest 40-cup glass dispenser.\n\n**We were able to get the pitcher set up and ready to use in less than 5 minutes,** earning it a high setup score of 9.50. But it had the highest filter replacement cost of all the filters we tested for this review (\\$0.90, based on its 20-gallon capacity, as outlined in its certification listing), resulting in the lowest maintenance score of just 8.00.\n\nLooking at Culligan’s company policies, the **90-day warranty is one of the lowest we’ve seen for a water filter pitcher**, and you’ll have to pay for shipping unless you spend more than \\$99 on your order. The ambiguous returns policy (each return is treated “uniquely”) was also a letdown, contributing to its company score of 7.60.\n\n| Criteria | Results |\n|---|---|\n| Overall Score | 9\\.33 |\n| Health Related Contaminants | 9\\.70 |\n| Aesthetic Related Contaminants | 8\\.00 |\n| Performance Certification | NSF\/ANSI 42, 53, 401 |\n| Filtration Rate | 1\\.9 GPH |\n| Component Quality | Excellent |\n| Component Certification | NSF\/ANSI 42, 53, 401 & 372 |\n| Setup | Outstanding |\n| Servicing Requirements | Exceptional |\n| Costs | \\$0.90\/ gallon |\n| Warranty Length | 90 days |\n| Shipping | Free shipping within the continental US on orders above \\$99 |\n| Returns | Limited returns |\n\nEpic Pure Pitcher\n\n![Epic Pure Water Filter Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Epic-Pure-Water-Filter-Pitcher.jpg)\n\nThe Epic Pure Pitcher uses a solid carbon block filter that blends three activated carbon media to reduce dozens of common drinking water contaminants. It got the best contaminant score out of all the water filter pitchers we tested, and we were pleased with its quick and easy setup and maintenance processes.\n\nOverall Score: 8.90\n\nHow We Test & Score\n\n9\\.00 Contaminant Reduction\n\n6\\.00 Design\n\n9\\.50 Maintenance\n\n10\\.00 Filtration Rate\n\n9\\.50 Setup\n\n8\\.95 Company\n\nBest For\n\nReduced all contaminants to below the HGL benchmark\n\nContaminant reduction score wasn’t compromised by the introduction of unwanted impurities\n\nBest value for money\n\nOption to upgrade to dispenser with a larger water-holding capacity\n\nSuper easy setup with no filter priming required\n\nProduct Specs\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Price | \\$70.00 |\n| Contaminants Reduced | 200+ |\n| Certifications | Not certified |\n| Process | Solid Activated Carbon Block |\n| Filter Capacity | 150 gallons |\n| Annual Cost | ~\\$150 |\n| Warranty | Lifetime |\n\nWhy It’s Best\n\nThe [**Epic Pure Pitcher**](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/epic-pure-water-filter-review\/) is the best overall water filter pitcher because it secured the best score for contaminant reduction.\n\nIn our testing, it reduced all health-related contaminants in our water to below the testing lab’s Health Guideline Levels (HGLs), and, unlike with some of the other pitchers we tested, no unwanted impurities appeared post-filtration.\n\nPlus, it’s **one of the best-value water filter pitchers we tested**, costing less than \\$70 upfront and boasting a super affordable ongoing cost.\n\n**Good to Know:** Epic sells two water filter pitchers: the Epic Pure and the Epic Nano. The Epic Pure (which we’re reviewing here) is intended for filtering city tap water, while the Epic Nano filter is designed for untreated surface or well water.\n\n****Discount:**** Get 20% off – Click Here for Code\n\nEpic Pure Performance\n\nThe Epic Pure scored a 9.30 for reducing health-related contaminants in our water. Our test results showed that the filter reduced **100% uranium, copper, and phosphorous, as well as 92% sulfate, 57% molybdenum, 41% barium, 27% fluoride, and 20% nitrate.**\n\n[![Made with Flourish](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/resources\/made_with_flourish.svg)](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/visualisation\/17159127\/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation\/17159127)\n\n[![Made with Flourish](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/resources\/made_with_flourish.svg)](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/visualisation\/17159109\/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation\/17159109)\n\nThe system also reduced 100% chlorine in our water, so it scored a 9.90 for improving our water’s aesthetics.\n\nOur only disappointment was that **the filter isn’t performance certified**, which reduced its score slightly.\n\nThe Epic Pure also impressed us with its setup and maintenance requirements – we awarded it a score of 9.50 for both categories. Setup was easy because the filter didn’t need priming; we just washed and assembled the pitcher and reservoir, then filtered and discarded the first two pitchers of water.\n\nWe calculated the pitcher’s **ongoing maintenance cost as \\$0.31\/ gallon**, meaning that we’d spend half as much as some of the other top-performing pitchers we tested. Replacing the filter was easy, and the 150-gallon filter capacity is one of the best we’ve seen. The pitcher has an LED countdown timer that helped us to know when to buy new filters.\n\nWe think the Epic Pure is the **best water filter pitcher for folks who want an all-rounder that can effectively reduce a range of contaminants**, even though not all contaminants were completely eliminated. Anyone who wants a filter that’s affordable and easy to set up and maintain should also be pleased with the Epic Pure pitcher.\n\n| Criteria | Results |\n|---|---|\n| Overall Score | 8\\.90 |\n| Health Related Contaminants | 9\\.30 |\n| Aesthetic Related Contaminants | 9\\.90 |\n| Performance Certification | Not Certified |\n| Filtration Rate | 2\\.23 GPH |\n| Component Quality | Unsatisfactory |\n| Component Certification | Not Certified |\n| Setup | Outstanding |\n| Servicing Requirements | Outstanding |\n| Costs | \\$0.31\/ gallon |\n| Warranty Length | Lifetime |\n| Shipping | Free shipping for the Clean Water Club only |\n| Returns | Lifetime |\n\nClearly Filtered Pitcher\n\n![Clearly Filtered water pitcher (400x400)](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/Clearly-Filtered-Water-Pitcher.png)\n\nThe Clearly Filtered Water Pitcher reduced more contaminants than most other water filter pitchers we’ve tested, and it has an advantage over the Epic Pure pitcher: **a WQA performance certification for chlorine and PFOA\/PFOS reduction.**\n\nOverall Score: 8.78\n\nHow We Test & Score\n\n8\\.24 Contaminant Reduction\n\n9\\.70 Design\n\n8\\.75 Maintenance\n\n10\\.00 Filtration Rate\n\n9\\.50 Setup\n\n9\\.00 Company\n\nBest For\n\nThorough water filtration\n\nWQA performance certified\n\nSturdy, durable design\n\nLong 100-gallon filter life\n\nRoomy 10-cup capacity\n\nProduct Specs\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Price | \\$90.00 |\n| Contaminants Reduced | 350+ |\n| Certifications | NSF\/ANSI 42 & 53 |\n| Process | Coconut Carbon Block |\n| Filter Capacity | 100 gallons |\n| Annual Cost | ~\\$150 |\n| Warranty | 1 year |\n\nWhat We Thought\n\nThe [**Clearly Filtered Water Pitcher**](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/clearly-filtered-water-pitcher-review\/) is the water filter pitcher that we recommend for folks who want a system with a **great overall contaminant reduction performance**.\n\nIt offered a greater contaminant reduction percentage than most similar systems in our testing, and we also noted that the pitcher materials felt sturdier and thicker than other pitchers, which felt flimsier and thinner in comparison.\n\nSetup was also really easy for the Clearly Filtered pitcher. Rather than having to filter and discard several batches of water (which is time-consuming), we primed the filter using the included priming bag, which took less than 10 minutes.\n\n****Discount:**** Get 10% off – Click Here for Code\n\nClearly Filtered Performance\n\nWe awarded the Clearly Filtered Pitcher a score of 8.24 for overall contaminant reduction. **It did better than the Epic Pure at reducing 100% fluoride, and its 100% uranium**, chlorine, and copper reduction matched Epic’s results.\n\n[![Made with Flourish](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/resources\/made_with_flourish.svg)](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/visualisation\/17080093\/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation\/17080093)\n\nThe CF pitcher also reduced 86% barium, 67% strontium, and 53% molybdenum. **Bu**t **its score was affected by the presence of 0.0054 PPM of cobalt in our filtered water** (it hadn’t been detected pre-filtration).\n\n[![Made with Flourish](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/resources\/made_with_flourish.svg)](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/visualisation\/17080119\/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation\/17080119)\n\nThere were two standout performance features that gave Clearly Filtered the edge over Epic: its WQA performance certifications and its high-quality plastic design.\n\nThe pitcher has been certified (to NSF Standards [42](https:\/\/find.wqa.org\/find-products\/ctl\/detail\/mid\/1054\/cid\/clearly_filtered_inc\/sid\/1?keyword=clearly+filtered) and [53](https:\/\/find.wqa.org\/find-products\/ctl\/detail\/mid\/1054\/cid\/clearly_filtered_inc\/sid\/3?keyword=clearly+filtered)) to reduce **3 out of the 365+ contaminants it’s claimed to reduce,** so it’s not the most impressive proof of performance that we’ve seen, but it’s still more reassuring than nothing.\n\n![Clearly filtered pitcher parts](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/Clearly-Filtered-pitcher-parts.jpg)\n\nAs for design, the Clearly Filtered pitcher got a score of 9.70. The pitcher is made from BPA-free Tritan plastic and is [WQA certified for lead-free design](https:\/\/find.wqa.org\/find-products\/ctl\/detail\/mid\/1054\/cid\/clearly_filtered_inc\/sid\/29?keyword=clearly+filtered), on top of holding a materials safety certification as a component of its performance certifications.\n\nWe timed the filtration process and recorded that the **CF pitcher filtered 0.5 gallons of water in 13 minutes and 12 seconds**, giving it a 2.27 GPH filtration rate. This put it slightly ahead of the Epic Pure, which had a 2.23 GPH filtration rate – but both filters got the top score here.\n\nWe think the Clearly Filtered Pitcher makes the most sense for people who are happy to pay a slightly higher upfront and ongoing cost to effectively address many contaminants in their water with a system that’s **certified for performance and materials safety**.\n\n| Criteria | Results |\n|---|---|\n| Overall Score | 8\\.78 |\n| Health Related Contaminants | 8\\.30 |\n| Aesthetic Related Contaminants | 9\\.90 |\n| Performance Certification | Certified for \\<1% of reduction claims |\n| Filtration Rate | 2\\.27 GPH |\n| Component Quality | Outstanding |\n| Component Certification | Certified |\n| Setup | Outstanding |\n| Servicing Requirements | Outstanding |\n| Costs | \\$0.55\/ gallon |\n| Warranty Length | 1 year |\n| Shipping | Free shipping |\n| Returns | 30 days |\n\nSantevia MINA Pitcher\n\n![Santevia MINA Alkaline Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/Santevia-MINA-Alkaline-Pitcher-1024x983.jpg)\n\nThe Santevia MINA Pitcher is the only alkalizing water filter pitcher to make our list. It did a great job of reducing many contaminants in our water, and we were impressed with its ability to **raise water pH by up to 2.0** (although our own results varied – more on that later).\n\nOverall Score: 8.45\n\nHow We Test & Score\n\n8\\.12 Contaminant Reduction\n\n8\\.10 Design\n\n9\\.75 Maintenance\n\n8\\.50 Filtration Rate\n\n9\\.50 Setup\n\n7\\.95 Company\n\nBest For\n\nReducing contaminants *and* increasing water’s alkalinity & pH\n\nBudget-friendly – costs less than \\$50 upfront\n\nEasy to maintain\n\nProduct Specs\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Price | \\$49.99 |\n| Contaminants Reduced | 85 |\n| Certifications | Not certified |\n| Process | Carbon + Ion Exchange + Remineralization |\n| Filter Capacity | 80 gallons |\n| Annual Cost | ~\\$120 |\n| Warranty | 90 days |\n\nWhy We Liked It\n\nThe [**Santevia MINA**](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/santevia-mina-review\/) was the best alkalizing water filter pitcher we tested, being the only filter to reduce healthy contaminants *and* increase the pH and alkalinity of water.\n\nIt’s also the most affordable of all the pitchers we’ve mentioned in this guide so far, falling within the \\$0-\\$50 price bracket, and with an ongoing **cost of just \\$0.25\/ gallon** – impressive given that it provides an additional water quality advantage that none of the other systems offer.\n\nSantevia MINA Performance\n\nThe Santevia MINA pitcher’s overall contaminant reduction score was 8.12, putting it only slightly behind Clearly Filtered and Epic Pure. It **reduced 7 contaminants in our water**: 100% chlorine, uranium, molybdenum, and copper, 78% barium, 77% nitrate, and 72% strontium.\n\n[![Made with Flourish](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/resources\/made_with_flourish.svg)](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/visualisation\/16832087\/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation\/16832087)\n\nHowever, the MINA pitcher isn’t performance-certified, which affected its overall score in this category. Plus, **fluoride actually increased slightly from 1.1 PPM to 1.2 PPM**, telling us that the filter doesn’t effectively address this contaminant.\n\n[![Made with Flourish](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/resources\/made_with_flourish.svg)](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/visualisation\/16832109\/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation\/16832109)\n\nSantevia’s main selling point is its ability to increase the alkalinity of water, which has a [few possible health benefits](https:\/\/www.mayoclinic.org\/healthy-lifestyle\/nutrition-and-healthy-eating\/expert-answers\/alkaline-water\/faq-20058029). When we first got the pitcher, we used a pH meter to test our water. **The unfiltered water had a 7.89 pH, and our filtered water’s pH had increased to 9.94. However, when we tested the pitcher later with a lab test, pH only increased by 0.1, from 7.4 to 7.5.**\n\n![Testing the pH level of water after filtration with Santevia MINA Alkaline Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/Testing-the-pH-level-of-water-after-filtration-with-Santevia-MINA-Alkaline-Pitcher.jpg)\n\n[![Made with Flourish](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/resources\/made_with_flourish.svg)](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/visualisation\/17090369\/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation\/17090369)\n\nThe system got an 8.50 score from us for its filtration rate. **It filtered 0.383 gallons of water in just over 16 minutes**, giving it a filtration rate of 1.43 GPH – around 1 GPM slower than most other pitchers we tested.\n\nWe couldn’t fault the filter setup process. It also got a 9.50 in this category because **assembly took less than 5 minutes** – we just had to wash and assemble the pitcher, then hold the filter under running water for 1 minute until the water ran clear.\n\nWe think the Santevia MINA pitcher is a great fit for folks who want to go a step further than simply reducing contaminants in their water, and anyone who wants the possible taste and health benefits of filtered water with an alkaline pH.\n\n| Criteria | Results |\n|---|---|\n| Overall Score | 8\\.45 |\n| Health Related Contaminants | 8\\.30 |\n| Aesthetic Related Contaminants | 9\\.50 |\n| Performance Certification | Not certified |\n| Filtration Rate | 1\\.43 GPH |\n| Component Quality | Outstanding |\n| Component Certification | Not certified |\n| Setup | Outstanding |\n| Servicing Requirements | Outstanding |\n| Costs | \\$0.25\/ gallon |\n| Warranty Length | 90 days |\n| Shipping | Free shipping on orders over \\$99, except Hawaii, Puerto Rico & Alaska |\n| Returns | 30 days |\n\nLARQ Pure-Vis Advanced Pitcher\n\n![LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/LARQ-Pure-Vis-Advanced-Pitcher.png)\n\nThe LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced Pitcher filters and purifies water with a unique 2-stage process involving a **filter cartridge and a UV wand**. It reduced numerous contaminants in our testing, and we thought it had the most attractive design of all the water filter pitchers we tested.\n\nOverall Score: 8.21\n\nHow We Test & Score\n\n8\\.14 Contaminant Reduction\n\n8\\.10 Design\n\n9\\.00 Maintenance\n\n7\\.00 Filtration Rate\n\n9\\.00 Setup\n\n8\\.35 Company\n\nBest For\n\nPrevents bacteria growth with UV disinfection\n\nAttractive, quality design\n\nEasy assembly and maintenance\n\nThe only high-tech pitcher we reviewed\n\nProduct Specs\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Price | \\$139.00 |\n| Contaminants Reduced | 60+ |\n| Certifications | Not Certified |\n| Process | Activated Carbon + UV Purification |\n| Filter Capacity | 60 gallons |\n| Annual Cost | ~\\$150 |\n| Warranty | 1 year |\n\nOur Take\n\nThe **LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced Pitcher** is the most expensive water filter pitcher we’ve tried, but it’s the only pitcher with a unique UV purification stage to prevent bacterial growth in the filtered water chamber.\n\nThe pitcher’s filtration performance wasn’t far off Clearly Filtered’s – it got the same score in our lab testing, but it doesn’t have a performance certification.\n\nLARQ Pure-Vis Performance\n\nWe awarded the LARQ Pure-Vis pitcher an 8.14 for contaminant reduction. It did a great job of removing 100% uranium, barium, strontium, and molybdenum, and reducing 97% copper, 88% sulfate, and 20% nitrate. **Unfortunately, it didn’t reduce fluoride in our water at all**.\n\n[![Made with Flourish](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/resources\/made_with_flourish.svg)](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/visualisation\/17078952\/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation\/17078952)\n\n[![Made with Flourish](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/resources\/made_with_flourish.svg)](https:\/\/public.flourish.studio\/visualisation\/17078910\/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation\/17078910)\n\nThe Pure-Vis pitcher’s UV purification stage is the biggest reason why we were drawn to the system. Microorganisms aren’t present in treated city water, but a number of studies (including [this study on Brita water filter pitchers](https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/8740859\/)) have found that microorganisms can grow in filter media. The LARQ pitcher provides protection against bacteria growth in the filter media and the pitcher chamber, so we didn’t have to wash it out as often as the other pitchers.\n\nThe system did well in the setup and maintenance categories, with scores of 9.00 in each. Setup was a *bit* more involved – we had to **soak the filter for 10 minutes before installing it**, charge the battery pack for the UV wand, and install the app. Maintenance required the same filter soaking and UV wand charging (but the battery lasts around 1 month on a full charge).\n\nWe estimated the filter’s ongoing cost as \\$0.54\/ gallon, so it’s about on par with the Clearly Filtered pitcher – not the cheapest, but not as costly as Culligan ZeroWater.\n\nAs for design, the LARQ pitcher felt like it was made from the same high-quality materials as Clearly Filtered. It felt thick, solid, and durable, and more capable of withstanding long-term use than the other pitchers we tested.\n\n![LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced pitcher components](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/LARQ-Pure-Vis-Advanced-pitcher-components.jpg)\n\nIn our opinion, the LARQ Pure-Vis pitcher is ideal for anyone who has concerns about biofilm growth and microorganisms in their filter media and the pitcher vessel itself, and folks who want the reassurance of filtering and purifying their water at the same time.\n\n| Criteria | Results |\n|---|---|\n| Overall Score | 8\\.21 |\n| Health Related Contaminants | 8\\.30 |\n| Aesthetic Related Contaminants | 9\\.90 |\n| Performance Certification | Not Certified |\n| Filtration Rate | 0\\.60 GPH |\n| Component Quality | Outstanding |\n| Component Certification | Not Certified |\n| Setup | Excellent |\n| Servicing Requirements | Exceptional |\n| Costs | \\$0.54\/ gallon |\n| Warranty Length | 1 year |\n| Shipping | Free on orders over \\$80 within the contiguous US |\n| Returns | 30 days, but only if unopened |\n## Filters That Didn’t Make the Cut\nWe want to close off this review with a quick mention of the other three pitchers we tested, which received lower performance scores than the rest and therefore didn’t make the cut.\n\nThese were:\n\n- [The PUR Plus Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/pur-water-filter-pitcher-review\/)\n- [The Brita Elite Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/brita-elite-water-filter-pitcher-review\/)\n- [The Waterdrop Chubby Pitcher](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/waterdrop-chubby-review\/)\n\nThese filters all got poorer contaminant reduction scores: the PUR Plus got 5.28; the Brita Elite got 4.29; and the Waterdrop Chubby got 4.24.\n\nNone of the pitchers are tested or certified to reduce most of the contaminants (like uranium, fluoride, and molybdenum) in our water. So we were unsurprised when the pitchers did a poor job of reducing these contaminants.\n\nOur testing outcomes don’t necessarily mean that the filters are incapable of reducing contaminants; **just that they couldn’t address our own water quality concerns**. If we’d tested the filters with water predominantly containing contaminants they *could* address, the contaminant reduction scores would likely have been higher.\n\n**That’s why testing your water before buying a filter is so important: you want to ensure that the system you choose can effectively address your unique water quality issues.**\n\n![Brian Campbell headshot](https:\/\/waterfilterguru.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/brian-headshot.jpg) President & CEO, CWS, CWR Brian Campbell, a WQA Certified Water Specialist (CWS) and Certified Water Treatment Representative (CWR) with 5+ years of experience, helps homeowners navigate the world of water treatment. After honing his skills at Hach Company, he founded his business to empower homeowners with the knowledge and tools to achieve safe, healthy water. Brian's tested countless devices, from simple pitchers to complex systems, helping his readers find the perfect fit for their unique needs.","meta_canonical":null}

3. Robots.txt Check

Query:

Response:

4. Spam/Ban Check

Query:

Response:

5. Seen Status Check

ℹ️ Skipped - page is already crawled

📄

INDEXABLE

✅

CRAWLED

8 hours ago

🤖

ROBOTS ALLOWED

Page Info Filters

Filter	Status	Condition	Details
HTTP status	PASS	`download_http_code = 200`	HTTP 200
Age cutoff	PASS	`download_stamp > now() - 6 MONTH`	0 months ago
History drop	PASS	`isNull(history_drop_reason)`	No drop reason
Spam/ban	PASS	`fh_dont_index != 1 AND ml_spam_score = 0`	ml_spam_score=0
Canonical	PASS	`meta_canonical IS NULL OR = '' OR = src_unparsed`	Not set

Page Details

Property	Value
URL	https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/
Last Crawled	2026-04-08 00:02:45 (8 hours ago)
First Indexed	2020-06-30 17:55:08 (5 years ago)
HTTP Status Code	200
Meta Title	The 5 Best Water Filter Pitchers, According to Our Testing
Meta Description	We tested 8 popular water filter pitchers and ranked them based on their contaminant reduction performance, design quality, certifications & more.
Meta Canonical	null
Boilerpipe Text	The best water filter pitchers are affordable, portable, and reduce dozens of contaminants using gravity-fed water filtration. We use our own evidence-based testing to review and compare water filters. I’ve personally tested all the water filters on this list, leveraging my experience as a WQA Certified Water Specialist (CWS) and Certified Water Treatment Representative (CWR) to review each product as both an expert and a customer. Overall Score: 9.33 Culligan ZeroWater Best contaminant reduction performance Most extensively certified Best value for money Easy to set up, no filter priming needed Overall Score: 8.90 Epic Pure Pitcher Second highest score for contaminant reduction Best value for money Easy to set up, no filter priming needed Affordable ongoing cost Overall Score: 8.78 Clearly Filtered Water Pitcher Reduced the most contaminants in our lab tests Highest quality design materials Certified for performance & materials safety Reduced 100% fluoride Table of Contents Our Testing & Selection Process The 5 Best Water Filter Pitchers Culligan ZeroWater Epic Pure Pitcher Clearly Filtered Pitcher Santevia MINA Pitcher LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced Pitcher Filters That Didn’t Make the Cut Our Testing & Selection Process How We Test & Score We use a metrics-driven process to test water filters for their performance. Our aim is to evaluate a system’s performance capabilities, value for money, and suitability for a specific situation or intended outcome. For our Best Water Filter Pitchers guide, we cherry-picked the filters that obtained the highest scores across each of our scoring categories, with a particular focus on contaminant reduction. We scored these pitchers based on how effectively they reduced contaminants in our water, what we thought about their design quality, their ease of setup and maintenance, and more. We also compared filter materials and technologies, and evaluated third-party lab test results when the manufacturer provided them, though these are not scoring factors. To ensure the fairest comparisons, we use fact-based, numerical data whenever we can. But some testing categories require us to conduct our own subjective assessment, giving our personal insight into a specific aspect of a product’s performance. You can see our complete testing and scoring process here. How We Choose the Winners To choose the best water filter pitchers, we evaluated all the filters we’ve reviewed and compared their testing data side-by-side. We selected the highest-scoring products, paying close attention to the filters that reduced the most contaminants in our water. The water filter pitchers we’ve recommended each have their own unique filter technologies and produce different outcomes. We aimed to provide enough variety to offer targeted recommendations for specific budgets and situations. We automatically excluded some products from this guide, including: 1. Countertop dispensers, units that require electricity to operate, and systems that can’t be classed as gravity-fed water filter pitchers. 2. Filters with availability/stock issues, or those not available in the USA. 3. Systems that were unable to match up to their competitors due to poorer contaminant reduction performance, those sold by lesser-known or less trustworthy brands, or those offering poorer value on the whole. Article Update History 11/07/2025 – Added Culligan ZeroWater, removed Legacy ZeroWater Culligan ZeroWater The Culligan ZeroWater Pitcher is the highest-scoring water filter pitcher we tested, earning an overall weighted score of 9.33. It removed more contaminants than any other water filter pitcher we tested and was the only product to be certified for 100% of its contaminant reduction claims . It also has a sturdier, better-quality construction than most other pitchers (with the exception of Clearly Filtered), but it did demineralize our water, and it has the highest maintenance cost of all the filters in this list. Overall Score: 9.33 How We Test & Score 9.65 Contaminant Reduction 9.40 Design 8.00 Maintenance 9.50 Filtration Rate 9.50 Setup 7.60 Company Best For The only pitcher to remove 100% of all metals, minerals, and inorganics Higher-quality design than most other pitchers IAPMO certified for 100% of contaminants claimed to reduce Certified for materials safety Fast filtration Product Specs Price $24.99+ Contaminants Reduced 25+ Certifications or Testing NSF/ANSI 42, 53, 401 & 372 Holding Capacity 7-40 cups Filter Lifespan 20 gallons Approx. Annual Cost $160+ Discount: Get 10% off – Click Here for Code Our Lab Tests In our Tap Score testing, the Culligan ZeroWater Pitcher outperformed all the other water filter pitchers we reviewed, removing 100% of all contaminants with health effects in our water , including uranium and fluoride, both initially detected in concentrations exceeding the HGL. It also eliminated sulfate, chlorine, nitrate, zinc, copper, strontium, barium, and molybdenum. ZeroWater filters use a dual ion exchange process, which greatly reduces or removes all charged ions. As a result, we also saw reductions or eliminations of carbonate, calcium, magnesium, bicarbonate, sodium, and hardness. The pH of our water was reduced from 7.6 (slightly alkaline) to 6.6 (slightly acidic), leading to a lower aesthetics score of 8.00. Since a big part of the filter’s marketing is its ability to reduce TDS down to 0, there’s no included remineralization media to mitigate these effects. Overall, though, the pitcher still earned the highest contaminant reduction score on this list (9.65), partly due to its exceptional health-related contaminant reduction and partly because it’s the only pitcher to have IAPMO certifications to NSF 42 , NSF 53 , and NSF 401 , for every single contaminant that it’s claimed to reduce. Other Scoring Factors When we consider just how thoroughly the Culligan ZeroWater Pitcher filtered our water, its filtration rate of 1.9 GPH (gallons per hour) is pretty impressive. It’s not the fastest filter on this list – Epic Pure, Clearly Filtered, and the legacy ZeroWater were quicker – but it still took just 7 minutes to filter a full pitcher of water, earning it a score of 9.50. Where Culligan ZeroWater did come out on top was in the design category, with a high score of 9.40. Most of the other pitchers we tested had construction issues, with thin, flimsy-feeling plastic. The Culligan ZeroWater pitcher feels sturdy, and it’s IAPMO certified for materials safety and lead-free design . You can choose from several pitcher sizes and capacities, from the smallest 7-cup model to the largest 40-cup glass dispenser. We were able to get the pitcher set up and ready to use in less than 5 minutes, earning it a high setup score of 9.50. But it had the highest filter replacement cost of all the filters we tested for this review ($0.90, based on its 20-gallon capacity, as outlined in its certification listing), resulting in the lowest maintenance score of just 8.00. Looking at Culligan’s company policies, the 90-day warranty is one of the lowest we’ve seen for a water filter pitcher , and you’ll have to pay for shipping unless you spend more than $99 on your order. The ambiguous returns policy (each return is treated “uniquely”) was also a letdown, contributing to its company score of 7.60. Criteria Results Overall Score 9.33 Health Related Contaminants 9.70 Aesthetic Related Contaminants 8.00 Performance Certification NSF/ANSI 42, 53, 401 Filtration Rate 1.9 GPH Component Quality Excellent Component Certification NSF/ANSI 42, 53, 401 & 372 Setup Outstanding Servicing Requirements Exceptional Costs $0.90/ gallon Warranty Length 90 days Shipping Free shipping within the continental US on orders above $99 Returns Limited returns Epic Pure Pitcher The Epic Pure Pitcher uses a solid carbon block filter that blends three activated carbon media to reduce dozens of common drinking water contaminants. It got the best contaminant score out of all the water filter pitchers we tested, and we were pleased with its quick and easy setup and maintenance processes. Overall Score: 8.90 How We Test & Score 9.00 Contaminant Reduction 6.00 Design 9.50 Maintenance 10.00 Filtration Rate 9.50 Setup 8.95 Company Best For Reduced all contaminants to below the HGL benchmark Contaminant reduction score wasn’t compromised by the introduction of unwanted impurities Best value for money Option to upgrade to dispenser with a larger water-holding capacity Super easy setup with no filter priming required Product Specs Price $70.00 Contaminants Reduced 200+ Certifications Not certified Process Solid Activated Carbon Block Filter Capacity 150 gallons Annual Cost ~$150 Warranty Lifetime Why It’s Best The Epic Pure Pitcher is the best overall water filter pitcher because it secured the best score for contaminant reduction. In our testing, it reduced all health-related contaminants in our water to below the testing lab’s Health Guideline Levels (HGLs), and, unlike with some of the other pitchers we tested, no unwanted impurities appeared post-filtration. Plus, it’s one of the best-value water filter pitchers we tested , costing less than $70 upfront and boasting a super affordable ongoing cost. Good to Know: Epic sells two water filter pitchers: the Epic Pure and the Epic Nano. The Epic Pure (which we’re reviewing here) is intended for filtering city tap water, while the Epic Nano filter is designed for untreated surface or well water. Discount: Get 20% off – Click Here for Code Epic Pure Performance The Epic Pure scored a 9.30 for reducing health-related contaminants in our water. Our test results showed that the filter reduced 100% uranium, copper, and phosphorous, as well as 92% sulfate, 57% molybdenum, 41% barium, 27% fluoride, and 20% nitrate. The system also reduced 100% chlorine in our water, so it scored a 9.90 for improving our water’s aesthetics. Our only disappointment was that the filter isn’t performance certified , which reduced its score slightly. The Epic Pure also impressed us with its setup and maintenance requirements – we awarded it a score of 9.50 for both categories. Setup was easy because the filter didn’t need priming; we just washed and assembled the pitcher and reservoir, then filtered and discarded the first two pitchers of water. We calculated the pitcher’s ongoing maintenance cost as $0.31/ gallon , meaning that we’d spend half as much as some of the other top-performing pitchers we tested. Replacing the filter was easy, and the 150-gallon filter capacity is one of the best we’ve seen. The pitcher has an LED countdown timer that helped us to know when to buy new filters. We think the Epic Pure is the best water filter pitcher for folks who want an all-rounder that can effectively reduce a range of contaminants , even though not all contaminants were completely eliminated. Anyone who wants a filter that’s affordable and easy to set up and maintain should also be pleased with the Epic Pure pitcher. Criteria Results Overall Score 8.90 Health Related Contaminants 9.30 Aesthetic Related Contaminants 9.90 Performance Certification Not Certified Filtration Rate 2.23 GPH Component Quality Unsatisfactory Component Certification Not Certified Setup Outstanding Servicing Requirements Outstanding Costs $0.31/ gallon Warranty Length Lifetime Shipping Free shipping for the Clean Water Club only Returns Lifetime Clearly Filtered Pitcher The Clearly Filtered Water Pitcher reduced more contaminants than most other water filter pitchers we’ve tested, and it has an advantage over the Epic Pure pitcher: a WQA performance certification for chlorine and PFOA/PFOS reduction. Overall Score: 8.78 How We Test & Score 8.24 Contaminant Reduction 9.70 Design 8.75 Maintenance 10.00 Filtration Rate 9.50 Setup 9.00 Company Best For Thorough water filtration WQA performance certified Sturdy, durable design Long 100-gallon filter life Roomy 10-cup capacity Product Specs Price $90.00 Contaminants Reduced 350+ Certifications NSF/ANSI 42 & 53 Process Coconut Carbon Block Filter Capacity 100 gallons Annual Cost ~$150 Warranty 1 year What We Thought The Clearly Filtered Water Pitcher is the water filter pitcher that we recommend for folks who want a system with a great overall contaminant reduction performance . It offered a greater contaminant reduction percentage than most similar systems in our testing, and we also noted that the pitcher materials felt sturdier and thicker than other pitchers, which felt flimsier and thinner in comparison. Setup was also really easy for the Clearly Filtered pitcher. Rather than having to filter and discard several batches of water (which is time-consuming), we primed the filter using the included priming bag, which took less than 10 minutes. Discount: Get 10% off – Click Here for Code Clearly Filtered Performance We awarded the Clearly Filtered Pitcher a score of 8.24 for overall contaminant reduction. It did better than the Epic Pure at reducing 100% fluoride, and its 100% uranium , chlorine, and copper reduction matched Epic’s results. The CF pitcher also reduced 86% barium, 67% strontium, and 53% molybdenum. Bu t its score was affected by the presence of 0.0054 PPM of cobalt in our filtered water (it hadn’t been detected pre-filtration). There were two standout performance features that gave Clearly Filtered the edge over Epic: its WQA performance certifications and its high-quality plastic design. The pitcher has been certified (to NSF Standards 42 and 53 ) to reduce 3 out of the 365+ contaminants it’s claimed to reduce, so it’s not the most impressive proof of performance that we’ve seen, but it’s still more reassuring than nothing. As for design, the Clearly Filtered pitcher got a score of 9.70. The pitcher is made from BPA-free Tritan plastic and is WQA certified for lead-free design , on top of holding a materials safety certification as a component of its performance certifications. We timed the filtration process and recorded that the CF pitcher filtered 0.5 gallons of water in 13 minutes and 12 seconds , giving it a 2.27 GPH filtration rate. This put it slightly ahead of the Epic Pure, which had a 2.23 GPH filtration rate – but both filters got the top score here. We think the Clearly Filtered Pitcher makes the most sense for people who are happy to pay a slightly higher upfront and ongoing cost to effectively address many contaminants in their water with a system that’s certified for performance and materials safety . Criteria Results Overall Score 8.78 Health Related Contaminants 8.30 Aesthetic Related Contaminants 9.90 Performance Certification Certified for <1% of reduction claims Filtration Rate 2.27 GPH Component Quality Outstanding Component Certification Certified Setup Outstanding Servicing Requirements Outstanding Costs $0.55/ gallon Warranty Length 1 year Shipping Free shipping Returns 30 days Santevia MINA Pitcher The Santevia MINA Pitcher is the only alkalizing water filter pitcher to make our list. It did a great job of reducing many contaminants in our water, and we were impressed with its ability to raise water pH by up to 2.0 (although our own results varied – more on that later). Overall Score: 8.45 How We Test & Score 8.12 Contaminant Reduction 8.10 Design 9.75 Maintenance 8.50 Filtration Rate 9.50 Setup 7.95 Company Best For Reducing contaminants and increasing water’s alkalinity & pH Budget-friendly – costs less than $50 upfront Easy to maintain Product Specs Price $49.99 Contaminants Reduced 85 Certifications Not certified Process Carbon + Ion Exchange + Remineralization Filter Capacity 80 gallons Annual Cost ~$120 Warranty 90 days Why We Liked It The Santevia MINA was the best alkalizing water filter pitcher we tested, being the only filter to reduce healthy contaminants and increase the pH and alkalinity of water. It’s also the most affordable of all the pitchers we’ve mentioned in this guide so far, falling within the $0-$50 price bracket, and with an ongoing cost of just $0.25/ gallon – impressive given that it provides an additional water quality advantage that none of the other systems offer. Santevia MINA Performance The Santevia MINA pitcher’s overall contaminant reduction score was 8.12, putting it only slightly behind Clearly Filtered and Epic Pure. It reduced 7 contaminants in our water : 100% chlorine, uranium, molybdenum, and copper, 78% barium, 77% nitrate, and 72% strontium. However, the MINA pitcher isn’t performance-certified, which affected its overall score in this category. Plus, fluoride actually increased slightly from 1.1 PPM to 1.2 PPM , telling us that the filter doesn’t effectively address this contaminant. Santevia’s main selling point is its ability to increase the alkalinity of water, which has a few possible health benefits . When we first got the pitcher, we used a pH meter to test our water. The unfiltered water had a 7.89 pH, and our filtered water’s pH had increased to 9.94. However, when we tested the pitcher later with a lab test, pH only increased by 0.1, from 7.4 to 7.5. The system got an 8.50 score from us for its filtration rate. It filtered 0.383 gallons of water in just over 16 minutes , giving it a filtration rate of 1.43 GPH – around 1 GPM slower than most other pitchers we tested. We couldn’t fault the filter setup process. It also got a 9.50 in this category because assembly took less than 5 minutes – we just had to wash and assemble the pitcher, then hold the filter under running water for 1 minute until the water ran clear. We think the Santevia MINA pitcher is a great fit for folks who want to go a step further than simply reducing contaminants in their water, and anyone who wants the possible taste and health benefits of filtered water with an alkaline pH. Criteria Results Overall Score 8.45 Health Related Contaminants 8.30 Aesthetic Related Contaminants 9.50 Performance Certification Not certified Filtration Rate 1.43 GPH Component Quality Outstanding Component Certification Not certified Setup Outstanding Servicing Requirements Outstanding Costs $0.25/ gallon Warranty Length 90 days Shipping Free shipping on orders over $99, except Hawaii, Puerto Rico & Alaska Returns 30 days LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced Pitcher The LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced Pitcher filters and purifies water with a unique 2-stage process involving a filter cartridge and a UV wand . It reduced numerous contaminants in our testing, and we thought it had the most attractive design of all the water filter pitchers we tested. Overall Score: 8.21 How We Test & Score 8.14 Contaminant Reduction 8.10 Design 9.00 Maintenance 7.00 Filtration Rate 9.00 Setup 8.35 Company Best For Prevents bacteria growth with UV disinfection Attractive, quality design Easy assembly and maintenance The only high-tech pitcher we reviewed Product Specs Price $139.00 Contaminants Reduced 60+ Certifications Not Certified Process Activated Carbon + UV Purification Filter Capacity 60 gallons Annual Cost ~$150 Warranty 1 year Our Take The LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced Pitcher is the most expensive water filter pitcher we’ve tried, but it’s the only pitcher with a unique UV purification stage to prevent bacterial growth in the filtered water chamber. The pitcher’s filtration performance wasn’t far off Clearly Filtered’s – it got the same score in our lab testing, but it doesn’t have a performance certification. LARQ Pure-Vis Performance We awarded the LARQ Pure-Vis pitcher an 8.14 for contaminant reduction. It did a great job of removing 100% uranium, barium, strontium, and molybdenum, and reducing 97% copper, 88% sulfate, and 20% nitrate. Unfortunately, it didn’t reduce fluoride in our water at all . The Pure-Vis pitcher’s UV purification stage is the biggest reason why we were drawn to the system. Microorganisms aren’t present in treated city water, but a number of studies (including this study on Brita water filter pitchers ) have found that microorganisms can grow in filter media. The LARQ pitcher provides protection against bacteria growth in the filter media and the pitcher chamber, so we didn’t have to wash it out as often as the other pitchers. The system did well in the setup and maintenance categories, with scores of 9.00 in each. Setup was a bit more involved – we had to soak the filter for 10 minutes before installing it , charge the battery pack for the UV wand, and install the app. Maintenance required the same filter soaking and UV wand charging (but the battery lasts around 1 month on a full charge). We estimated the filter’s ongoing cost as $0.54/ gallon, so it’s about on par with the Clearly Filtered pitcher – not the cheapest, but not as costly as Culligan ZeroWater. As for design, the LARQ pitcher felt like it was made from the same high-quality materials as Clearly Filtered. It felt thick, solid, and durable, and more capable of withstanding long-term use than the other pitchers we tested. In our opinion, the LARQ Pure-Vis pitcher is ideal for anyone who has concerns about biofilm growth and microorganisms in their filter media and the pitcher vessel itself, and folks who want the reassurance of filtering and purifying their water at the same time. Criteria Results Overall Score 8.21 Health Related Contaminants 8.30 Aesthetic Related Contaminants 9.90 Performance Certification Not Certified Filtration Rate 0.60 GPH Component Quality Outstanding Component Certification Not Certified Setup Excellent Servicing Requirements Exceptional Costs $0.54/ gallon Warranty Length 1 year Shipping Free on orders over $80 within the contiguous US Returns 30 days, but only if unopened Filters That Didn’t Make the Cut We want to close off this review with a quick mention of the other three pitchers we tested, which received lower performance scores than the rest and therefore didn’t make the cut. These were: The PUR Plus Pitcher The Brita Elite Pitcher The Waterdrop Chubby Pitcher These filters all got poorer contaminant reduction scores: the PUR Plus got 5.28; the Brita Elite got 4.29; and the Waterdrop Chubby got 4.24. None of the pitchers are tested or certified to reduce most of the contaminants (like uranium, fluoride, and molybdenum) in our water. So we were unsurprised when the pitchers did a poor job of reducing these contaminants. Our testing outcomes don’t necessarily mean that the filters are incapable of reducing contaminants; just that they couldn’t address our own water quality concerns . If we’d tested the filters with water predominantly containing contaminants they could address, the contaminant reduction scores would likely have been higher. That’s why testing your water before buying a filter is so important: you want to ensure that the system you choose can effectively address your unique water quality issues. President & CEO, CWS, CWR Brian Campbell, a WQA Certified Water Specialist (CWS) and Certified Water Treatment Representative (CWR) with 5+ years of experience, helps homeowners navigate the world of water treatment. After honing his skills at Hach Company, he founded his business to empower homeowners with the knowledge and tools to achieve safe, healthy water. Brian's tested countless devices, from simple pitchers to complex systems, helping his readers find the perfect fit for their unique needs.
Markdown	[Skip to content](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#content) We may earn compensation from some providers below. [Learn More](https://waterfilterguru.com/disclaimer/) [![WaterFilterGuru.com](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Logo_large_medium-240x51.png)](https://waterfilterguru.com/) - [Water Filtration](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/) - Comparisons - [Best Water Filters of 2026](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filters/) - [Best Whole House Water Filters](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-whole-house-water-filter-reviews/) - [Best Water Filter Pitchers](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/) - Guides - [Emergency Water Filters](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-emergency-water-filter/) - [Reverse Osmosis Systems](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-reverse-osmosis-system-reviews/) - [Under-Sink Filters](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-under-sink-water-filter-reviews/) - [Countertop Filters](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-countertop-water-filter-reviews/) - Water Filter Resources - [Filter Finder Quiz](https://waterfilterguru.com/find-your-system/) - [How to Choose a Water Filter](https://waterfilterguru.com/how-to-choose-a-water-filter/) - [Water Filter Buyer’s Guide](https://waterfilterguru.com/water-filtration-systems/) - [RO System Buyer’s Guide](https://waterfilterguru.com/reverse-osmosis-systems/) - [Hard Water](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/) - Comparisons - [Best Water Softeners](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-softener-reviews/) - [Best Salt-Free Water Conditioners](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-salt-free-water-softener/) - Guides - [How to Size a Water Softener](https://waterfilterguru.com/what-size-water-softener-do-i-need/) - [Water Softener Buyer’s Guide](https://waterfilterguru.com/water-softener-systems/) - Hard Water Resources - [Hard Water Treatment Guide](https://waterfilterguru.com/how-to-soften-hard-water/) - [Hard Water vs Soft Water](https://waterfilterguru.com/hard-water-vs-soft-water/) - [Well Water](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/) - Comparisons - [Best Well Water Filtration Systems](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-whole-house-water-filter-for-well-water/) - [Best Water Softeners for Well Water](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-softener-for-well-water/) - Guides - [Owning a Home on Well Water](https://waterfilterguru.com/well-water/) - [UV Water Purifier Guide](https://waterfilterguru.com/uv-water-purifier-systems/) - [Contaminants](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/) - Comparisons - [Best Water Filters for Fluoride](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-fluoride-water-filter/) - [Best Water Filters for Lead](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-for-lead/) - [Best Water Filters for PFAs](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-for-pfas/) - [Best Water Filters for Microplastics](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-for-microplastics/) - Water Testing - [How to Test Water Quality](https://waterfilterguru.com/how-to-test-water-quality/) - [Water Contaminants Guide](https://waterfilterguru.com/common-drinking-water-contaminants/) - [Best Water Test Kits](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-home-water-test-kit/) - [Tap Score Review](https://waterfilterguru.com/tap-score-review/) - [About Us](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/) - [Our Company](https://waterfilterguru.com/about-us/) - [YouTube Channel](https://www.youtube.com/@waterfilterguru?sub_confirmation=1) - [Our Research](https://waterfilterguru.com/research/) - [Blog](https://waterfilterguru.com/blog/) - [Store](https://shop.waterfilterguru.com/) [Book Consultation](https://waterfilterguru.com/consulting/) [Book Consultation](https://waterfilterguru.com/consulting/) [Search](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/) We may earn compensation from some providers below. [Learn More](https://waterfilterguru.com/disclaimer/) [![WaterFilterGuru.com](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Logo_large_medium-240x51.png)](https://waterfilterguru.com/) - [Water Filtration](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/) - Comparisons - [Best Water Filters of 2026](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filters/) - [Best Whole House Water Filters](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-whole-house-water-filter-reviews/) - [Best Water Filter Pitchers](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/) - Guides - [Emergency Water Filters](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-emergency-water-filter/) - [Reverse Osmosis Systems](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-reverse-osmosis-system-reviews/) - [Under-Sink Filters](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-under-sink-water-filter-reviews/) - [Countertop Filters](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-countertop-water-filter-reviews/) - Water Filter Resources - [Filter Finder Quiz](https://waterfilterguru.com/find-your-system/) - [How to Choose a Water Filter](https://waterfilterguru.com/how-to-choose-a-water-filter/) - [Water Filter Buyer’s Guide](https://waterfilterguru.com/water-filtration-systems/) - [RO System Buyer’s Guide](https://waterfilterguru.com/reverse-osmosis-systems/) - [Hard Water](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/) - Comparisons - [Best Water Softeners](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-softener-reviews/) - [Best Salt-Free Water Conditioners](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-salt-free-water-softener/) - Guides - [How to Size a Water Softener](https://waterfilterguru.com/what-size-water-softener-do-i-need/) - [Water Softener Buyer’s Guide](https://waterfilterguru.com/water-softener-systems/) - Hard Water Resources - [Hard Water Treatment Guide](https://waterfilterguru.com/how-to-soften-hard-water/) - [Hard Water vs Soft Water](https://waterfilterguru.com/hard-water-vs-soft-water/) - [Well Water](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/) - Comparisons - [Best Well Water Filtration Systems](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-whole-house-water-filter-for-well-water/) - [Best Water Softeners for Well Water](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-softener-for-well-water/) - Guides - [Owning a Home on Well Water](https://waterfilterguru.com/well-water/) - [UV Water Purifier Guide](https://waterfilterguru.com/uv-water-purifier-systems/) - [Contaminants](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/) - Comparisons - [Best Water Filters for Fluoride](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-fluoride-water-filter/) - [Best Water Filters for Lead](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-for-lead/) - [Best Water Filters for PFAs](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-for-pfas/) - [Best Water Filters for Microplastics](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-for-microplastics/) - Water Testing - [How to Test Water Quality](https://waterfilterguru.com/how-to-test-water-quality/) - [Water Contaminants Guide](https://waterfilterguru.com/common-drinking-water-contaminants/) - [Best Water Test Kits](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-home-water-test-kit/) - [Tap Score Review](https://waterfilterguru.com/tap-score-review/) - [About Us](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/) - [Our Company](https://waterfilterguru.com/about-us/) - [YouTube Channel](https://www.youtube.com/@waterfilterguru?sub_confirmation=1) - [Our Research](https://waterfilterguru.com/research/) - [Blog](https://waterfilterguru.com/blog/) - [Store](https://shop.waterfilterguru.com/) [Book Consultation](https://waterfilterguru.com/consulting/) [Book Consultation](https://waterfilterguru.com/consulting/) - [Home](https://waterfilterguru.com/) - [Water Filtration Systems](https://waterfilterguru.com/category/water-filter-systems/) - The 5 Best Water Filter Pitchers, According to Our Testing # The 5 Best Water Filter Pitchers, According to Our Testing updated: February 1, 2026 🤝 Our content is written by humans, not AI robots. [Learn More](https://waterfilterguru.com/editorial-guidelines/#written-by-real-humans) - ![Brian Campbell headshot](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/brian-headshot.jpg) [Brian Campbell](https://waterfilterguru.com/author/brian/ "Brian Campbell") The best water filter pitchers are affordable, portable, and reduce dozens of contaminants using gravity-fed water filtration. We use our own evidence-based testing to review and compare water filters. I’ve personally tested all the water filters on this list, leveraging my experience as a WQA Certified Water Specialist (CWS) and Certified Water Treatment Representative (CWR) to review each product as both an expert and a customer. ![Culligan ZeroWater pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Culligan-ZeroWater.jpg) Overall Score: 9.33 Culligan ZeroWater Best contaminant reduction performance Most extensively certified Best value for money Easy to set up, no filter priming needed [View at culligan.com](https://waterfilterguru.com/go/culligan-zerowater-pitcher) [View on Amazon](https://amzn.to/3Wz0jon) ![Epic Pure Water Filter Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Epic-Pure-Water-Filter-Pitcher.jpg) Overall Score: 8.90 Epic Pure Pitcher Second highest score for contaminant reduction Best value for money Easy to set up, no filter priming needed Affordable ongoing cost [View at epicwaterfilters.com](https://waterfilterguru.com/go/epic-pure-pitcher) [View on Amazon](https://amzn.to/3Qj4Qer) [View at Walmart](https://goto.walmart.com/c/2277861/565706/9383?veh=aff&sourceid=imp_000011112222333344&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.walmart.com%2Fip%2FEpic-Pure-Water-Filter-Pitcher-3-5L-150-Gallon-100-BPA-Free-Removes-Fluoride-Lead-Chromium-6-PFOS-PFOA-Heavy-Metals-Pesticides-Chemicals-Industrial-P%2F115196799) ![Clearly Filtered Water Pitcher (400x400)](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Clearly-Filtered-Water-Pitcher-400x400-1.jpg) Overall Score: 8.78 Clearly Filtered Water Pitcher Reduced the most contaminants in our lab tests Highest quality design materials Certified for performance & materials safety Reduced 100% fluoride [View at clearlyfiltered.com](https://waterfilterguru.com/go/clearly-filtered-pitcher) [View on Amazon](https://amzn.to/4m56xGx) Table of Contents - [Our Testing & Selection Process](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#Our_Testing_Selection_Process) - [The 5 Best Water Filter Pitchers](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#The_5_Best_Water_Filter_Pitchers) - [Culligan ZeroWater](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#Culligan_ZeroWater) - [Epic Pure Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#Epic_Pure_Pitcher) - [Clearly Filtered Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#Clearly_Filtered_Pitcher) - [Santevia MINA Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#Santevia_MINA_Pitcher) - [LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#LARQ_Pure-Vis_Advanced_Pitcher) - [Filters That Didn’t Make the Cut](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#Filters_That_Didnt_Make_the_Cut) ## Our Testing & Selection Process How We Test & Score We use a metrics-driven process to test water filters for their performance. Our aim is to evaluate a system’s performance capabilities, value for money, and suitability for a specific situation or intended outcome. For our Best Water Filter Pitchers guide, we cherry-picked the filters that obtained the highest scores across each of our scoring categories, with a particular focus on contaminant reduction. ![scoring factors pie chart](data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%201024%20666'%3E%3C/svg%3E)![scoring factors pie chart](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/scoring-factors-1024x666.png) We scored these pitchers based on how effectively they reduced contaminants in our water, what we thought about their design quality, their ease of setup and maintenance, and more. We also compared filter materials and technologies, and evaluated third-party lab test results when the manufacturer provided them, though these are not scoring factors. To ensure the fairest comparisons, we use fact-based, numerical data whenever we can. But some testing categories require us to conduct our own subjective assessment, giving our personal insight into a specific aspect of a product’s performance. [You can see our complete testing and scoring process here.](https://waterfilterguru.com/how-we-test-water-filters/) How We Choose the Winners To choose the best water filter pitchers, we evaluated all the filters we’ve reviewed and compared their testing data side-by-side. We selected the highest-scoring products, paying close attention to the filters that reduced the most contaminants in our water. The water filter pitchers we’ve recommended each have their own unique filter technologies and produce different outcomes. We aimed to provide enough variety to offer targeted recommendations for specific budgets and situations. We automatically excluded some products from this guide, including: 1\. Countertop dispensers, units that require electricity to operate, and systems that can’t be classed as gravity-fed water filter pitchers. 2\. Filters with availability/stock issues, or those not available in the USA. 3\. Systems that were unable to match up to their competitors due to poorer contaminant reduction performance, those sold by lesser-known or less trustworthy brands, or those offering poorer value on the whole. Article Update History 11/07/2025 – Added Culligan ZeroWater, removed Legacy ZeroWater ## The 5 Best Water Filter Pitchers \| Product \| ![culligan zerowater Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Culligan-ZeroWater.jpg) Culligan ZeroWater \| ![Epic Nano Water Filter Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Epic-Pure-Water-Filter-Pitcher.jpg) Epic Pure \| ![Clearly Filtered Water Pitcher](data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%20400%20400'%3E%3C/svg%3E)![Clearly Filtered Water Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Clearly-Filtered-Water-Pitcher.png) Clearly Filtered \| ![Santevia MINA Pitcher](data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%201024%20983'%3E%3C/svg%3E)![Santevia MINA Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Santevia-MINA-Alkaline-Pitcher-1024x983.jpg) Santevia MINA \| ![LARQ Pure Vis Advanced Pitcher](data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%20400%20400'%3E%3C/svg%3E)![LARQ Pure Vis Advanced Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/LARQ-Pure-Vis-Advanced-Pitcher.png) LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced \| \|---\|---\|---\|---\|---\|---\| \| Score \| 9\.33 \| 8\.90 \| 8\.78 \| 8\.45 \| 8\.21 \| \| Price \| \$24.99+ \| \$70.00 \| \$90.00 \| \$49.99 \| \$139.00 \| \| Certifications \| NSF/ANSI 42, 53, 401 & 372 \| Not certified \| NSF/ANSI 42 & 53 \| Not certified \| Not certified \| \| Filter Capacity \| 20 gallons \| 150 gallons \| 100 gallons \| 80 gallons \| 60 gallons \| \| Cost per Gallon \| \$0.90 \| \$0.31 \| \$0.55 \| \$0.25 \| \$0.54 \| \| Warranty \| 90 days \| Lifetime \| 1 year \| 90 days \| 1 year \| \| Read Review \| [Culligan ZeroWater review](https://waterfilterguru.com/culligan-zerowater-review/) \| [Epic Pure review](https://waterfilterguru.com/epic-pure-water-filter-review/) \| [Clearly Filtered review](https://waterfilterguru.com/clearly-filtered-water-pitcher-review/) \| [Santevia MINA review](https://waterfilterguru.com/santevia-mina-review/) \| [LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced review](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/) \| ## Culligan ZeroWater ![Culligan ZeroWater](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Culligan-ZeroWater.jpg) The Culligan ZeroWater Pitcher is the highest-scoring water filter pitcher we tested, earning an overall weighted score of 9.33. It removed more contaminants than any other water filter pitcher we tested and was the only product to be certified for 100% of its contaminant reduction claims. It also has a sturdier, better-quality construction than most other pitchers (with the exception of Clearly Filtered), but it did demineralize our water, and it has the highest maintenance cost of all the filters in this list. Overall Score: 9.33 How We Test & Score 9\.65 Contaminant Reduction 9\.40 Design 8\.00 Maintenance 9\.50 Filtration Rate 9\.50 Setup 7\.60 Company ### Best For The only pitcher to remove 100% of all metals, minerals, and inorganics Higher-quality design than most other pitchers IAPMO certified for 100% of contaminants claimed to reduce Certified for materials safety Fast filtration ### Product Specs \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Price \| \$24.99+ \| \| Contaminants Reduced \| 25+ \| \| Certifications or Testing \| NSF/ANSI 42, 53, 401 & 372 \| \| Holding Capacity \| 7-40 cups \| \| Filter Lifespan \| 20 gallons \| \| Approx. Annual Cost \| \$160+ \| [View at culligan.com](https://waterfilterguru.com/go/culligan-zerowater-pitcher) [View on Amazon](https://amzn.to/3Wz0jon) **Discount: Get 10% off – Click Here for Code ### Our Lab Tests In our Tap Score testing, the [Culligan ZeroWater Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/culligan-zerowater-review/) outperformed all the other water filter pitchers we reviewed, removing 100% of all contaminants with health effects in our water, including uranium and fluoride, both initially detected in concentrations exceeding the HGL. It also eliminated sulfate, chlorine, nitrate, zinc, copper, strontium, barium, and molybdenum. [![Made with Flourish](data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E)![Made with Flourish](https://public.flourish.studio/resources/made_with_flourish.svg)](https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/26096129/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation/26096129) [![Made with Flourish](data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E)![Made with Flourish](https://public.flourish.studio/resources/made_with_flourish.svg)](https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/26096100/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation/26096100) ZeroWater filters use a dual ion exchange process, which greatly reduces or removes all charged ions. As a result, we also saw reductions or eliminations of carbonate, calcium, magnesium, bicarbonate, sodium, and hardness. The pH of our water was reduced from 7.6 (slightly alkaline) to 6.6 (slightly acidic), leading to a lower aesthetics score of 8.00. Since a big part of the filter’s marketing is its ability to reduce TDS down to 0, there’s no included remineralization media to mitigate these effects. Overall, though, the pitcher still earned the highest contaminant reduction score on this list (9.65), partly due to its exceptional health-related contaminant reduction and partly because it’s the only pitcher to have IAPMO certifications to [NSF 42](https://pld.iapmo.org/file_info.asp?file_no=0017154), [NSF 53](https://pld.iapmo.org/file_info.asp?file_no=0017154), and [NSF 401](https://pld.iapmo.org/file_info.asp?file_no=0017156), for every single contaminant that it’s claimed to reduce. ### Other Scoring Factors ![Culligan ZeroWater Pitcher](data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%20800%20520'%3E%3C/svg%3E) ![Culligan ZeroWater Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Culligan-ZeroWater-Pitcher.jpg) When we consider just how thoroughly the Culligan ZeroWater Pitcher filtered our water, its filtration rate of 1.9 GPH (gallons per hour) is pretty impressive. It’s not the fastest filter on this list – Epic Pure, Clearly Filtered, and the legacy ZeroWater were quicker – but it still took just 7 minutes to filter a full pitcher of water, earning it a score of 9.50.** Where Culligan ZeroWater did come out on top was in the design category, with a high score of 9.40. Most of the other pitchers we tested had construction issues, with thin, flimsy-feeling plastic. The Culligan ZeroWater pitcher feels sturdy, and it’s IAPMO certified for materials safety and [lead-free design](https://pld.iapmo.org/file_info.asp?file_no=0017157). You can choose from several pitcher sizes and capacities, from the smallest 7-cup model to the largest 40-cup glass dispenser. We were able to get the pitcher set up and ready to use in less than 5 minutes, earning it a high setup score of 9.50. But it had the highest filter replacement cost of all the filters we tested for this review (\$0.90, based on its 20-gallon capacity, as outlined in its certification listing), resulting in the lowest maintenance score of just 8.00. Looking at Culligan’s company policies, the 90-day warranty is one of the lowest we’ve seen for a water filter pitcher, and you’ll have to pay for shipping unless you spend more than \$99 on your order. The ambiguous returns policy (each return is treated “uniquely”) was also a letdown, contributing to its company score of 7.60. \| Criteria \| Results \| \|---\|---\| \| Overall Score \| 9\.33 \| \| Health Related Contaminants \| 9\.70 \| \| Aesthetic Related Contaminants \| 8\.00 \| \| Performance Certification \| NSF/ANSI 42, 53, 401 \| \| Filtration Rate \| 1\.9 GPH \| \| Component Quality \| Excellent \| \| Component Certification \| NSF/ANSI 42, 53, 401 & 372 \| \| Setup \| Outstanding \| \| Servicing Requirements \| Exceptional \| \| Costs \| \$0.90/ gallon \| \| Warranty Length \| 90 days \| \| Shipping \| Free shipping within the continental US on orders above \$99 \| \| Returns \| Limited returns \| ## Epic Pure Pitcher ![Epic Pure Water Filter Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Epic-Pure-Water-Filter-Pitcher.jpg) The Epic Pure Pitcher uses a solid carbon block filter that blends three activated carbon media to reduce dozens of common drinking water contaminants. It got the best contaminant score out of all the water filter pitchers we tested, and we were pleased with its quick and easy setup and maintenance processes. Overall Score: 8.90 How We Test & Score 9\.00 Contaminant Reduction 6\.00 Design 9\.50 Maintenance 10\.00 Filtration Rate 9\.50 Setup 8\.95 Company ### Best For Reduced all contaminants to below the HGL benchmark Contaminant reduction score wasn’t compromised by the introduction of unwanted impurities Best value for money Option to upgrade to dispenser with a larger water-holding capacity Super easy setup with no filter priming required ### Product Specs \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Price \| \$70.00 \| \| Contaminants Reduced \| 200+ \| \| Certifications \| Not certified \| \| Process \| Solid Activated Carbon Block \| \| Filter Capacity \| 150 gallons \| \| Annual Cost \| ~\$150 \| \| Warranty \| Lifetime \| ### Why It’s Best The [Epic Pure Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/epic-pure-water-filter-review/) is the best overall water filter pitcher because it secured the best score for contaminant reduction. In our testing, it reduced all health-related contaminants in our water to below the testing lab’s Health Guideline Levels (HGLs), and, unlike with some of the other pitchers we tested, no unwanted impurities appeared post-filtration. Plus, it’s one of the best-value water filter pitchers we tested, costing less than \$70 upfront and boasting a super affordable ongoing cost. Good to Know: Epic sells two water filter pitchers: the Epic Pure and the Epic Nano. The Epic Pure (which we’re reviewing here) is intended for filtering city tap water, while the Epic Nano filter is designed for untreated surface or well water. [View at epicwaterfilters.com](https://waterfilterguru.com/go/epic-pure-pitcher) [View on Amazon](https://amzn.to/3Qj4Qer) [View at Walmart](https://goto.walmart.com/c/2277861/565706/9383?veh=aff&sourceid=imp_000011112222333344&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.walmart.com%2Fip%2FEpic-Pure-Water-Filter-Pitcher-3-5L-150-Gallon-100-BPA-Free-Removes-Fluoride-Lead-Chromium-6-PFOS-PFOA-Heavy-Metals-Pesticides-Chemicals-Industrial-P%2F115196799) **Discount: Get 20% off – Click Here for Code ### Epic Pure Performance The Epic Pure scored a 9.30 for reducing health-related contaminants in our water. Our test results showed that the filter reduced 100% uranium, copper, and phosphorous, as well as 92% sulfate, 57% molybdenum, 41% barium, 27% fluoride, and 20% nitrate. [![Made with Flourish](data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E)![Made with Flourish](https://public.flourish.studio/resources/made_with_flourish.svg)](https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/17159127/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation/17159127) [![Made with Flourish](data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E)![Made with Flourish](https://public.flourish.studio/resources/made_with_flourish.svg)](https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/17159109/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation/17159109) The system also reduced 100% chlorine in our water, so it scored a 9.90 for improving our water’s aesthetics. Our only disappointment was that the filter isn’t performance certified, which reduced its score slightly. The Epic Pure also impressed us with its setup and maintenance requirements – we awarded it a score of 9.50 for both categories. Setup was easy because the filter didn’t need priming; we just washed and assembled the pitcher and reservoir, then filtered and discarded the first two pitchers of water. We calculated the pitcher’s ongoing maintenance cost as \$0.31/ gallon, meaning that we’d spend half as much as some of the other top-performing pitchers we tested. Replacing the filter was easy, and the 150-gallon filter capacity is one of the best we’ve seen. The pitcher has an LED countdown timer that helped us to know when to buy new filters. We think the Epic Pure is the best water filter pitcher for folks who want an all-rounder that can effectively reduce a range of contaminants, even though not all contaminants were completely eliminated. Anyone who wants a filter that’s affordable and easy to set up and maintain should also be pleased with the Epic Pure pitcher. \| Criteria \| Results \| \|---\|---\| \| Overall Score \| 8\.90 \| \| Health Related Contaminants \| 9\.30 \| \| Aesthetic Related Contaminants \| 9\.90 \| \| Performance Certification \| Not Certified \| \| Filtration Rate \| 2\.23 GPH \| \| Component Quality \| Unsatisfactory \| \| Component Certification \| Not Certified \| \| Setup \| Outstanding \| \| Servicing Requirements \| Outstanding \| \| Costs \| \$0.31/ gallon \| \| Warranty Length \| Lifetime \| \| Shipping \| Free shipping for the Clean Water Club only \| \| Returns \| Lifetime \| ## Clearly Filtered Pitcher ![Clearly Filtered water pitcher (400x400)](data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%20400%20400'%3E%3C/svg%3E) ![Clearly Filtered water pitcher (400x400)](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Clearly-Filtered-Water-Pitcher.png) The Clearly Filtered Water Pitcher reduced more contaminants than most other water filter pitchers we’ve tested, and it has an advantage over the Epic Pure pitcher: a WQA performance certification for chlorine and PFOA/PFOS reduction. Overall Score: 8.78 How We Test & Score 8\.24 Contaminant Reduction 9\.70 Design 8\.75 Maintenance 10\.00 Filtration Rate 9\.50 Setup 9\.00 Company ### Best For Thorough water filtration WQA performance certified Sturdy, durable design Long 100-gallon filter life Roomy 10-cup capacity ### Product Specs \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Price \| \$90.00 \| \| Contaminants Reduced \| 350+ \| \| Certifications \| NSF/ANSI 42 & 53 \| \| Process \| Coconut Carbon Block \| \| Filter Capacity \| 100 gallons \| \| Annual Cost \| ~\$150 \| \| Warranty \| 1 year \| ### What We Thought The [Clearly Filtered Water Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/clearly-filtered-water-pitcher-review/) is the water filter pitcher that we recommend for folks who want a system with a great overall contaminant reduction performance. It offered a greater contaminant reduction percentage than most similar systems in our testing, and we also noted that the pitcher materials felt sturdier and thicker than other pitchers, which felt flimsier and thinner in comparison. Setup was also really easy for the Clearly Filtered pitcher. Rather than having to filter and discard several batches of water (which is time-consuming), we primed the filter using the included priming bag, which took less than 10 minutes. [View at clearlyfiltered.com](https://waterfilterguru.com/go/clearly-filtered-pitcher) [View on Amazon](https://amzn.to/4m56xGx) Discount: Get 10% off – Click Here for Code ### Clearly Filtered Performance We awarded the Clearly Filtered Pitcher a score of 8.24 for overall contaminant reduction. It did better than the Epic Pure at reducing 100% fluoride, and its 100% uranium, chlorine, and copper reduction matched Epic’s results. [![Made with Flourish](data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E)![Made with Flourish](https://public.flourish.studio/resources/made_with_flourish.svg)](https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/17080093/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation/17080093) The CF pitcher also reduced 86% barium, 67% strontium, and 53% molybdenum. But its score was affected by the presence of 0.0054 PPM of cobalt in our filtered water (it hadn’t been detected pre-filtration). [![Made with Flourish](data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E)![Made with Flourish](https://public.flourish.studio/resources/made_with_flourish.svg)](https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/17080119/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation/17080119) There were two standout performance features that gave Clearly Filtered the edge over Epic: its WQA performance certifications and its high-quality plastic design. The pitcher has been certified (to NSF Standards [42](https://find.wqa.org/find-products/ctl/detail/mid/1054/cid/clearly_filtered_inc/sid/1?keyword=clearly+filtered) and [53](https://find.wqa.org/find-products/ctl/detail/mid/1054/cid/clearly_filtered_inc/sid/3?keyword=clearly+filtered)) to reduce 3 out of the 365+ contaminants it’s claimed to reduce, so it’s not the most impressive proof of performance that we’ve seen, but it’s still more reassuring than nothing. ![Clearly filtered pitcher parts](data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%20800%20520'%3E%3C/svg%3E) ![Clearly filtered pitcher parts](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Clearly-Filtered-pitcher-parts.jpg) As for design, the Clearly Filtered pitcher got a score of 9.70. The pitcher is made from BPA-free Tritan plastic and is [WQA certified for lead-free design](https://find.wqa.org/find-products/ctl/detail/mid/1054/cid/clearly_filtered_inc/sid/29?keyword=clearly+filtered), on top of holding a materials safety certification as a component of its performance certifications. We timed the filtration process and recorded that the CF pitcher filtered 0.5 gallons of water in 13 minutes and 12 seconds, giving it a 2.27 GPH filtration rate. This put it slightly ahead of the Epic Pure, which had a 2.23 GPH filtration rate – but both filters got the top score here. We think the Clearly Filtered Pitcher makes the most sense for people who are happy to pay a slightly higher upfront and ongoing cost to effectively address many contaminants in their water with a system that’s certified for performance and materials safety. \| Criteria \| Results \| \|---\|---\| \| Overall Score \| 8\.78 \| \| Health Related Contaminants \| 8\.30 \| \| Aesthetic Related Contaminants \| 9\.90 \| \| Performance Certification \| Certified for \<1% of reduction claims \| \| Filtration Rate \| 2\.27 GPH \| \| Component Quality \| Outstanding \| \| Component Certification \| Certified \| \| Setup \| Outstanding \| \| Servicing Requirements \| Outstanding \| \| Costs \| \$0.55/ gallon \| \| Warranty Length \| 1 year \| \| Shipping \| Free shipping \| \| Returns \| 30 days \| ## Santevia MINA Pitcher ![Santevia MINA Alkaline Pitcher](data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%201024%20983'%3E%3C/svg%3E) ![Santevia MINA Alkaline Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Santevia-MINA-Alkaline-Pitcher-1024x983.jpg) The Santevia MINA Pitcher is the only alkalizing water filter pitcher to make our list. It did a great job of reducing many contaminants in our water, and we were impressed with its ability to raise water pH by up to 2.0** (although our own results varied – more on that later). Overall Score: 8.45 How We Test & Score 8\.12 Contaminant Reduction 8\.10 Design 9\.75 Maintenance 8\.50 Filtration Rate 9\.50 Setup 7\.95 Company ### Best For Reducing contaminants and increasing water’s alkalinity & pH Budget-friendly – costs less than \$50 upfront Easy to maintain ### Product Specs \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Price \| \$49.99 \| \| Contaminants Reduced \| 85 \| \| Certifications \| Not certified \| \| Process \| Carbon + Ion Exchange + Remineralization \| \| Filter Capacity \| 80 gallons \| \| Annual Cost \| ~\$120 \| \| Warranty \| 90 days \| ### Why We Liked It The [Santevia MINA](https://waterfilterguru.com/santevia-mina-review/) was the best alkalizing water filter pitcher we tested, being the only filter to reduce healthy contaminants and increase the pH and alkalinity of water. It’s also the most affordable of all the pitchers we’ve mentioned in this guide so far, falling within the \$0-\$50 price bracket, and with an ongoing cost of just \$0.25/ gallon – impressive given that it provides an additional water quality advantage that none of the other systems offer. [View on Amazon](https://amzn.to/4ovBxli) ### Santevia MINA Performance The Santevia MINA pitcher’s overall contaminant reduction score was 8.12, putting it only slightly behind Clearly Filtered and Epic Pure. It reduced 7 contaminants in our water: 100% chlorine, uranium, molybdenum, and copper, 78% barium, 77% nitrate, and 72% strontium. [![Made with Flourish](data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E)![Made with Flourish](https://public.flourish.studio/resources/made_with_flourish.svg)](https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/16832087/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation/16832087) However, the MINA pitcher isn’t performance-certified, which affected its overall score in this category. Plus, fluoride actually increased slightly from 1.1 PPM to 1.2 PPM, telling us that the filter doesn’t effectively address this contaminant. [![Made with Flourish](data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E)![Made with Flourish](https://public.flourish.studio/resources/made_with_flourish.svg)](https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/16832109/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation/16832109) Santevia’s main selling point is its ability to increase the alkalinity of water, which has a [few possible health benefits](https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/nutrition-and-healthy-eating/expert-answers/alkaline-water/faq-20058029). When we first got the pitcher, we used a pH meter to test our water. The unfiltered water had a 7.89 pH, and our filtered water’s pH had increased to 9.94. However, when we tested the pitcher later with a lab test, pH only increased by 0.1, from 7.4 to 7.5. ![Testing the pH level of water after filtration with Santevia MINA Alkaline Pitcher](data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%20800%20520'%3E%3C/svg%3E) ![Testing the pH level of water after filtration with Santevia MINA Alkaline Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Testing-the-pH-level-of-water-after-filtration-with-Santevia-MINA-Alkaline-Pitcher.jpg) [![Made with Flourish](data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E)![Made with Flourish](https://public.flourish.studio/resources/made_with_flourish.svg)](https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/17090369/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation/17090369) The system got an 8.50 score from us for its filtration rate. It filtered 0.383 gallons of water in just over 16 minutes, giving it a filtration rate of 1.43 GPH – around 1 GPM slower than most other pitchers we tested. We couldn’t fault the filter setup process. It also got a 9.50 in this category because assembly took less than 5 minutes – we just had to wash and assemble the pitcher, then hold the filter under running water for 1 minute until the water ran clear. We think the Santevia MINA pitcher is a great fit for folks who want to go a step further than simply reducing contaminants in their water, and anyone who wants the possible taste and health benefits of filtered water with an alkaline pH. \| Criteria \| Results \| \|---\|---\| \| Overall Score \| 8\.45 \| \| Health Related Contaminants \| 8\.30 \| \| Aesthetic Related Contaminants \| 9\.50 \| \| Performance Certification \| Not certified \| \| Filtration Rate \| 1\.43 GPH \| \| Component Quality \| Outstanding \| \| Component Certification \| Not certified \| \| Setup \| Outstanding \| \| Servicing Requirements \| Outstanding \| \| Costs \| \$0.25/ gallon \| \| Warranty Length \| 90 days \| \| Shipping \| Free shipping on orders over \$99, except Hawaii, Puerto Rico & Alaska \| \| Returns \| 30 days \| ## LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced Pitcher ![LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced Pitcher](data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%20400%20400'%3E%3C/svg%3E) ![LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/LARQ-Pure-Vis-Advanced-Pitcher.png) The LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced Pitcher filters and purifies water with a unique 2-stage process involving a filter cartridge and a UV wand. It reduced numerous contaminants in our testing, and we thought it had the most attractive design of all the water filter pitchers we tested. Overall Score: 8.21 How We Test & Score 8\.14 Contaminant Reduction 8\.10 Design 9\.00 Maintenance 7\.00 Filtration Rate 9\.00 Setup 8\.35 Company ### Best For Prevents bacteria growth with UV disinfection Attractive, quality design Easy assembly and maintenance The only high-tech pitcher we reviewed ### Product Specs \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Price \| \$139.00 \| \| Contaminants Reduced \| 60+ \| \| Certifications \| Not Certified \| \| Process \| Activated Carbon + UV Purification \| \| Filter Capacity \| 60 gallons \| \| Annual Cost \| ~\$150 \| \| Warranty \| 1 year \| ### Our Take The LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced Pitcher is the most expensive water filter pitcher we’ve tried, but it’s the only pitcher with a unique UV purification stage to prevent bacterial growth in the filtered water chamber. The pitcher’s filtration performance wasn’t far off Clearly Filtered’s – it got the same score in our lab testing, but it doesn’t have a performance certification. [See price on Amazon](https://amzn.to/3TEXHV7) ### LARQ Pure-Vis Performance We awarded the LARQ Pure-Vis pitcher an 8.14 for contaminant reduction. It did a great job of removing 100% uranium, barium, strontium, and molybdenum, and reducing 97% copper, 88% sulfate, and 20% nitrate. Unfortunately, it didn’t reduce fluoride in our water at all. [![Made with Flourish](data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E)![Made with Flourish](https://public.flourish.studio/resources/made_with_flourish.svg)](https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/17078952/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation/17078952) [![Made with Flourish](data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E)![Made with Flourish](https://public.flourish.studio/resources/made_with_flourish.svg)](https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/17078910/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation/17078910) The Pure-Vis pitcher’s UV purification stage is the biggest reason why we were drawn to the system. Microorganisms aren’t present in treated city water, but a number of studies (including [this study on Brita water filter pitchers](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8740859/)) have found that microorganisms can grow in filter media. The LARQ pitcher provides protection against bacteria growth in the filter media and the pitcher chamber, so we didn’t have to wash it out as often as the other pitchers. The system did well in the setup and maintenance categories, with scores of 9.00 in each. Setup was a bit more involved – we had to soak the filter for 10 minutes before installing it, charge the battery pack for the UV wand, and install the app. Maintenance required the same filter soaking and UV wand charging (but the battery lasts around 1 month on a full charge). We estimated the filter’s ongoing cost as \$0.54/ gallon, so it’s about on par with the Clearly Filtered pitcher – not the cheapest, but not as costly as Culligan ZeroWater. As for design, the LARQ pitcher felt like it was made from the same high-quality materials as Clearly Filtered. It felt thick, solid, and durable, and more capable of withstanding long-term use than the other pitchers we tested. ![LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced pitcher components](data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%20800%20520'%3E%3C/svg%3E) ![LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced pitcher components](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/LARQ-Pure-Vis-Advanced-pitcher-components.jpg) In our opinion, the LARQ Pure-Vis pitcher is ideal for anyone who has concerns about biofilm growth and microorganisms in their filter media and the pitcher vessel itself, and folks who want the reassurance of filtering and purifying their water at the same time. \| Criteria \| Results \| \|---\|---\| \| Overall Score \| 8\.21 \| \| Health Related Contaminants \| 8\.30 \| \| Aesthetic Related Contaminants \| 9\.90 \| \| Performance Certification \| Not Certified \| \| Filtration Rate \| 0\.60 GPH \| \| Component Quality \| Outstanding \| \| Component Certification \| Not Certified \| \| Setup \| Excellent \| \| Servicing Requirements \| Exceptional \| \| Costs \| \$0.54/ gallon \| \| Warranty Length \| 1 year \| \| Shipping \| Free on orders over \$80 within the contiguous US \| \| Returns \| 30 days, but only if unopened \| ## Filters That Didn’t Make the Cut We want to close off this review with a quick mention of the other three pitchers we tested, which received lower performance scores than the rest and therefore didn’t make the cut. These were: - [The PUR Plus Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/pur-water-filter-pitcher-review/) - [The Brita Elite Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/brita-elite-water-filter-pitcher-review/) - [The Waterdrop Chubby Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/waterdrop-chubby-review/) These filters all got poorer contaminant reduction scores: the PUR Plus got 5.28; the Brita Elite got 4.29; and the Waterdrop Chubby got 4.24. None of the pitchers are tested or certified to reduce most of the contaminants (like uranium, fluoride, and molybdenum) in our water. So we were unsurprised when the pitchers did a poor job of reducing these contaminants. Our testing outcomes don’t necessarily mean that the filters are incapable of reducing contaminants; just that they couldn’t address our own water quality concerns. If we’d tested the filters with water predominantly containing contaminants they could address, the contaminant reduction scores would likely have been higher. That’s why testing your water before buying a filter is so important: you want to ensure that the system you choose can effectively address your unique water quality issues. - ![Brian Campbell headshot](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/brian-headshot.jpg) [Brian Campbell](https://waterfilterguru.com/author/brian/ "Brian Campbell") President & CEO, CWS, CWR Brian Campbell, a WQA Certified Water Specialist (CWS) and Certified Water Treatment Representative (CWR) with 5+ years of experience, helps homeowners navigate the world of water treatment. After honing his skills at Hach Company, he founded his business to empower homeowners with the knowledge and tools to achieve safe, healthy water. Brian's tested countless devices, from simple pitchers to complex systems, helping his readers find the perfect fit for their unique needs. ### 44 thoughts on “The 5 Best Water Filter Pitchers, According to Our Testing” 1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/34ebba1c560b8942e79b9d366a4c15074055719800feeddcb6f7a22649b728b4?s=50&d=mm&r=g) Julie Soucy [March 7, 2026 at 4:27 pm](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-9179) Do they filter the hormones or antibiotics that may remains in the water? [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-9179) 1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/brian-headshot.jpg) Brian Campbell [March 16, 2026 at 3:34 pm](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-9191) Depends on the filter. Those that use activated carbon should be able to reduce trace personal care and pharmaceutical products (PCPPs). Even better, find a system certified for the reduction of hormones like estrone like the [Culligan ZeroWater](https://waterfilterguru.com/go/culligan-zerowater-pitcher) [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-9191) 2. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/4d651ec08572c46d56d1f323d5fa6c853c828e0dbc8f96a6aacf8d89bcc336eb?s=50&d=mm&r=g) Jennings [January 9, 2026 at 8:09 am](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-9082) Have you tested or do you recommend cyclopure which removes PFAS only? [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-9082) 1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/brian-headshot.jpg) Brian Campbell [January 10, 2026 at 7:33 am](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-9083) I have not tested it [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-9083) 3. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/b6e2a8525bee949878d5f6a2dffb336ba0a2166cb7a02df1f340e245480567be?s=50&d=mm&r=g) Sudipto [September 20, 2025 at 8:48 pm](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-8839) The “Epic Pure” water filter on their site mentions they reduce microplastics by 99%. Is that true? You have mentioned that only “Clearly Filtered” does that? So I am confused. Also what about the material used to manufacture the filter. Are they also made with Tritan for for both “Epic Pure” & “Clearly Filtered”? Please compare both these water pitcher & filters on the below these 2 counts (since other aspects seem to be dead heat) – 1. Reduction of microplastics 2. Material used to make both the water pitcher and the actual filter Thanks a lot Brain\! [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-8839) 1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/brian-headshot.jpg) Brian Campbell [October 1, 2025 at 9:47 am](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-8870) Great question, and I can see why it’s confusing. To clarify, I’ve not specifically tested either pitcher for microplastics yet, so I don’t have any firsthand data for you. Also, neither Epic nor Clearly Filtered has official third-party certification for microplastics reduction. So when you see claims like “99% reduction,” that’s marketing language rather than certification-backed proof. Clearly Filtered has been much more transparent with data and independent testing than Epic. As for the materials: both Epic Pure and Clearly Filtered pitchers use Tritan plastic for the reservoir and housing. Tritan has NSF certifications for food-contact safety (NSF 51) and drinking-water components (NSF 61), which means it’s been tested for extraction of harmful substances. The filters themselves are generally made from a blend of activated carbon and proprietary media encased in plastic housings, also usually Tritan or a similar BPA-free plastic. So, in short: neither has certified proof for microplastics reduction, but both use Tritan plastic in their pitcher construction and filter housings (or so they claim). Thanks a lot for the thoughtful question\! [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-8870) 4. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/b6e2a8525bee949878d5f6a2dffb336ba0a2166cb7a02df1f340e245480567be?s=50&d=mm&r=g) Sudipto [September 20, 2025 at 4:39 pm](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-8838) Hi Brian – First of all a HUGE vote of THANKS for publishing such valuable information on water filters. Really kudos to you\! Now my questions & situation – First a very basic dumb question. Since piped municipal water (which I get in my home) is already treated by the local water company why do we at all need water filters? I have the water quality report (<https://delcowater.org/waterquality/>) of my local water company & all substances are in the recommended range. The only thing which I feel we should worry about in general is the contaminants coming from the water pipe (lead, etc) & micro-plastics in general. Please correct me if I am wrong. Anyway pending a decision I am relying on bottled spring water. I am on the lookout for a counter top water filter pitcher. From the Top-3 you have posted, all seem to be doing an equally good job contaminant reduction though traces of Cobalt & Chloroform reduced the scores of two of the filters. But what about only the “Health-Related” contaminants – are all 3 similar? What about PFA reduction by these 3. Of these 3, my choice would be “Clearly Filtered Pitcher” because – A. The material of the jug seems to be superior to others (BPA & BPAs free). After all no use of having a great filtered water but lying in a plastic jug potentially leaching microplastics (?). B. Somewhere you mentioned that this one reduces microplastics though that is not mentioned anywhere. Why do you say that as that is one of my top concerns. (You also mentioned PUR Plus does that, but seems that filter did not pass your basic tests). I am also tempted to consider Epic Pure pitcher instead if you so advise. AMAZON Reviews for Epic Pure are higher than “Clearly Filtered Pitcher”, though the medical grade material of the latter seems to be a winner in my view. Please advise. Looking forward to hearing from you… [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-8838) 1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/brian-headshot.jpg) Brian Campbell [October 1, 2025 at 9:57 am](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-8871) Appreciate the kind words thank you! On your first question: utilities are required to meet legally enforceable maximum contaminant levels (MCLs), but those limits are set by balancing treatment cost and feasibility with health risk, so they don’t always reflect the most conservative, health-first targets. Not every contaminant is regulated, either. Examples include things like many pharmaceuticals, 1,4-dioxane in some jurisdictions, and microplastics so even if your report shows everything “in range,” there can still be gaps. And water can be recontaminated after it leaves the plant as it moves through mains and your home’s plumbing (lead, copper, and particulate rust are classic distribution-system issues). From a residential treatment perspective, I prefer to reference the most conservative health-based guidelines when interpreting reports, not just the federal MCLs. Regarding PFAS and pitchers: in general, any high-quality carbon media with enough contact time \can\ reduce PFAS, but I don’t have firsthand lab data for every pitcher on your shortlist. One important update: Clearly Filtered had been certified by WQA to NSF/ANSI 53 for PFAS reduction, but just yesterday it was brought to my attention that the certification listing has been removed. I’ve reached out to CF for clarification and will update my content accordingly. In the meantime, treat all marketing around PFAS with cautious optimism and, where possible, look for current, verifiable certifications. Microplastics: I’ve not specifically tested for microplastics yet, so I don’t have any firsthand data for you, and neither of the pitchers you mentioned is certified for microplastics reduction. That said, their fine-pore carbon blocks should capture a portion of larger particles; the open question is how they perform across the full size range found in real tap water. If microplastics are your top concern, that’s another reason certifications matter. Material safety: BPA/BPS-free claims are good, but what I care about most is extraction/material-safety testing as part of reputable certifications (this is where standards ensure the plastics aren’t leaching concerning levels of anything into the water). Clearly Filtered’s pitcher and filter components have historically aligned with those material-safety expectations, and in my testing their overall contaminant reduction was strong. Still, remember that my testing is limited and not conclusive; what worked well in my source water may not behave the same in yours. For example, PUR struggled with the naturally occurring fluoride level in my water so performance is very water-dependent. I hope this helps [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-8871) 5. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d1d0c3498b4849b3ec402b282c01a3120066c13ff33cb3d21d71ad9c4e7e254b?s=50&d=mm&r=g) m.b. [September 16, 2025 at 3:07 pm](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-8831) Are there any glass water filter pitchers that you’d recommend? thanks\! [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-8831) 1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/brian-headshot.jpg) Brian Campbell [September 17, 2025 at 7:02 am](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-8832) None that I’ve tested yet. [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-8832) 6. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/bb687f16ae08500c0d8c6cc1f5187a77073da86eeed6f00843f1a6f703998fb0?s=50&d=mm&r=g) James [September 12, 2025 at 7:45 pm](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-8823) It’s a shame that none of them were the rectangle ones with a spigot; that’s the sort I’m looking to get. [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-8823) 1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/brian-headshot.jpg) Brian Campbell [September 15, 2025 at 8:28 am](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-8825) That’s just a different vessel – the filter elements are the same. For example the [Epic Pure Dispenser](https://waterfilterguru.com/go/epic-pure-dispenser) and the [ZeroWater dispenser](https://waterfilterguru.com/go/zerowater-32-cup-dispenser) use the same filter elements as the pitcher versions. [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-8825) 7. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/aad88edf0db7e4355538c93d312af8346321dcbe9ca2405fa521dd2219b5a3a4?s=50&d=mm&r=g) Lisa [August 2, 2025 at 6:41 am](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-8259) Brian, Have you tested/reviewed the LifeStraw filter pitcher? It has a glass vessel but a silicon filter. Trying to determine the safety of this. Thank you [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-8259) 1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/brian-headshot.jpg) Brian Campbell [August 2, 2025 at 8:18 am](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-8261) Not yet but it’s on my list for next time I test pitchers [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-8261) 8. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/21c9b284b8d17cf4ac52a386c5dd759f41108e9fb9a7ef5527504b63e4f963ce?s=50&d=mm&r=g) M [May 2, 2025 at 10:03 am](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-7392) You did so much work looking at all these products, but they’re ALL MADE OF PLASTIC. So you filter the water and then let it sit in a plastic container. And BPA-free doesn’t mean a whole lot. When companies stopped using BPA, they switched it up a little (BPS, etc) and called it “BPA-free.” More and more evidence comes out about how toxic plastic is in general–ingesting (or breathing in) microplastics and nanoplastics. If that isn’t on your radar now, it will be soon. Do you have any reviews of glass (or stainless?) pitcher-style or other counter-top water filters that don’t contain plastic? Thanks. [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-7392) 1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/brian-headshot.jpg) Brian Campbell [May 14, 2025 at 5:00 pm](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-7474) Not yet. Unfortunately, currently, the vast majority of water filters use plastic components. If not the pitcher vessel itself, the filter is still housed in plastic. Your best bet to completely avoid plastic exposure would be distillation into a glass vessel. [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-7474) 9. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/621fe45ed5cae7559bb059163e1cb912439c6b78ae27ff2b01877c09fcedd65f?s=50&d=mm&r=g) Julliette [April 6, 2025 at 9:30 am](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-7247) Thanks for your testing. As a single person with a small refrigerator, I’d like a narrow pitcher, less than 3 inches. Since 33% of Americans are single-person households, I doubt my need is unusual. I don’t suppose you’ve come across any good pitchers that are smaller? [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-7247) 1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/brian-headshot.jpg) Brian Campbell [April 16, 2025 at 2:21 pm](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-7324) The best I’ve found are featured in this article. When I test more I’ll update here accordingly. [PUR has a small 7 cup pitcher](https://amzn.to/49R9xAI) [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-7324) 10. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/dd6933cdfdb70f11e2dac1a206c8f51614a5482648c86c50e5ac7208f019f076?s=50&d=mm&r=g) Brian [January 27, 2025 at 8:05 pm](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-6836) The ZeroWater Ready-Pour Pitcher link listed only links to a 5 stage filter, but you mention a 6 stage filter. Why the discrepancy, or a typo? [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-6836) 1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/brian-headshot.jpg) Brian Campbell [January 31, 2025 at 12:26 pm](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-6853) That would be a typo on our end, thanks for the heads up! This has been corrected. ZeroWater is a 5-stage filter [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-6853) 11. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/70e890953a7439439f0c827568b344b3dc4bb631ab58c02767a0f67a7a1570c8?s=50&d=mm&r=g) Tony [January 10, 2025 at 7:24 pm](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-6762) Didn’t LARQ do a 3rd-party lab test of their water pitcher somewhere in 2021? It’s on their website, and here’s the direct link to their performance report. I heard they tested it to NSF/ANSI 42, 53 & 401 standards. [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-6762) 1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/brian-headshot.jpg) Brian Campbell [January 20, 2025 at 1:19 pm](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-6803) While third party testing is a great first step, it’s good to note that third party testing and official performance certifications are not the same thing\! [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-6803) 12. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/7b85317285cf9ec02aa154386ddaf6fccd2caebc460dd8c4900a546d132d0faa?s=50&d=mm&r=g) Shiloh [December 27, 2024 at 7:02 pm](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-6675) Have you ever tested the “best water filter ever” from the wellness enterprise? I am curious how it stacks up to the rest of the filters that were reviewed. [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-6675) 1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/brian-headshot.jpg) Brian Campbell [January 5, 2025 at 9:02 am](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-6729) I’ve not, but I can add it to my list to look into\! [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-6729) 13. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/46bc0db5385708840a25c6db1aa0429bc222dab1c64f98c7229eb64122704004?s=50&d=mm&r=g) David [November 1, 2024 at 3:02 pm](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-6386) Hi. Has Epic Pure solved its premature filter failure problem? (Read the reviews on Amazon; many people are complaining about this, I worry when any product gets 23% negative reviews. ) [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-6386) 1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/brian-headshot.jpg) Brian Campbell [November 2, 2024 at 3:41 pm](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-6396) Premature filter failure? Filter lifespan is dependent on multiple factors and will be different from situation to situation. Type and concentration of contaminants present and usage directly affect how fast a filter will reach capacity and need to be replaced. The more contaminated the water, the shorter the filter lifespan. [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-6396) 1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/46bc0db5385708840a25c6db1aa0429bc222dab1c64f98c7229eb64122704004?s=50&d=mm&r=g) David [November 2, 2024 at 7:55 pm](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-6401) I understand that but some are complaining it happens very quickly, sometimes within days or a couple of weeks. Read the 1-3 star reviews on Amazon and let me know what you think. Thanks\! [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-6401) 1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/brian-headshot.jpg) Brian Campbell [November 4, 2024 at 12:01 pm](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-6409) I can’t really speak to the experience those folks have had as I don’t have information or data about their situation and how they’ve used the filter. I’m always wary of reviews on Amazon as their review system is so easily manipulated too. [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-6409) 1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/b06157515b0aa0b86ebdc56be3cc46d1688860c1da8524ace0c5c3945361ecbb?s=50&d=mm&r=g) anna [December 19, 2024 at 9:05 pm](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-6635) hi, i also experienced filter slow down within days (2 filters bought on amazon), we use the nano as we have well water. We leave plenty of time for the filtration to complete, like overnight. And I also noticed the filtration rate varies and will speed up after having slowing down in first couple days. 14. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/e1a126a38bb665c1aa4063f9d89de073c315f1ba9bfc8a52a2c82fb975b0a714?s=50&d=mm&r=g) Rupert [September 27, 2024 at 2:30 pm](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-6063) Does the TDS included w/ the Zero Water Filter System measure the safety of the water? Could it test at 0 but still have toxic levels of lead, etc? [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-6063) 1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/brian-headshot.jpg) Brian Campbell [September 29, 2024 at 8:03 am](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-6070) No, a TDS meter does not tell you if water is healthy or safe or not. It measures the total dissolved solids, which includes both healthy minerals (like calcium and magnesium) as well as more dangerous contaminants like metals. Additionally, a TDS meter does not provide any information about uncharged contaminants, like some pesticides, herbicides and PFAs. The best way to find out what’s in your water and determine it’s safety is by [testing with a certified lab](https://waterfilterguru.com/go/tap-score-tests). [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-6070) 15. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/62c84b9df08cb314d33536233548652781058c55b62e4dfe7298ab9d8d525511?s=50&d=mm&r=g) Mignone [August 3, 2024 at 4:05 pm](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-5519) I tested my tap water through Tap Score. Our water utility gets our water from Lake Tahoe. The test results are OK so far except for HAA5 specifically DCA: Dichloroacetic Acid is elevated: 0.0025 PPM. I am looking for both a water filter pitcher and an undercounter filter (I currently have InSink Erator F-3000) that will remove or lower to a healthy level the DCA. Any suggestions? [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-5519) 1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/brian-headshot.jpg) Brian Campbell [August 3, 2024 at 4:23 pm](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-5520) Activated carbon is an effective method to reduce Dichloroacetic Acid, so any water filter that uses activated carbon media should do a good job addressing this for you [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-5520) 2. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/62c84b9df08cb314d33536233548652781058c55b62e4dfe7298ab9d8d525511?s=50&d=mm&r=g) Mignone [August 4, 2024 at 2:00 pm](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-5527) Our VOC water tests also indicated an elevated level of: Total THMs at 2.96 and Chloroform at 2.96 (HGL 0.22). So we’d like to add that to the list of what we want to filter out of our drinking water. We do have elevated: uranium, Lead and Arsenic; but I think most filters can lower these contaminants. We look forward to hearing from you. We are especially concerned about the Chloroform level as we have regular visitors who are 3 years old and 5 months old…. [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-5527) 16. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/74b72b0b231d873461c53091aeff72fb129877b7323631a77c2a77792d241b46?s=50&d=mm&r=g) Sergi [April 21, 2024 at 2:48 pm](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-4474) Excellent comparison and very useful. Isn’t it worrying that filter jugs like EPIC PURE, Santevia MINA or LARQ increase sulfate or chloride levels after the filtering process? Does this pose any security risk? I am surprised that EPIC PURE is in position 1 in the ranking, considering this data [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-4474) 1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/brian-headshot.jpg) Brian Campbell [April 22, 2024 at 7:23 am](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-4479) Hey Sergi, thanks for the comment! While we observed slight increases in the impurities mentioned, the levels were well below the Health Guideline Level benchmark, so we did not consider them too much of a concern. [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-4479) 17. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/f58eba870e467953b6b91e140fbef2e278240f0fb90bc0d038e066438db31c89?s=50&d=mm&r=g) Barbara Ondricko [April 10, 2024 at 12:18 pm](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-4375) I live in Windsor Ontario Canada and our water is currently disinfected using ozonation . I am looking to upgrade from the Pur Plus system and I am particularly concerned about plastic microcontaminants that ozonation does not address. I am only interested in a water pitcher system . Thankyou for your time. [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-4375) 1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/brian-headshot.jpg) Brian Campbell [April 11, 2024 at 8:36 am](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-4379) Hey Barbara, [the Clearly Filtered water pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/go/clearly-filtered-pitcher) performed well in our testing and has been tested to reduce microplastics, but it’s not yet certified to do so. If you are looking for a pitcher thats specifically certified to reduce microplastics, [check out the PUR Plus](https://amzn.to/49SFrgF). [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-4379) 18. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/7c90b61a3ba38db04b7cc79e923c984bbfaedb5adf1d8e373733a9dbebeb9a0c?s=50&d=mm&r=g) richard [April 5, 2024 at 1:20 am](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-4348) Please help me understand why the Zero water was rated \#3 when it removed almost 100% of everything that it was being tested for and the con was only that it had a expensive filter. It seems like that is the best filter hands down amongst the 5 filters. [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-4348) 1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/brian-headshot.jpg) Brian Campbell [April 6, 2024 at 8:26 am](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-4357) The ZeroWater received an 8.62/10 when put through [our data-driven scoring system](https://waterfilterguru.com/how-we-test-water-filters/). It’s overall contaminant reduction score (8.34) was dragged down due to the presence of disinfection byproducts in the filtered water. The overall score was greatly impacted by this because Contaminant Reduction is given the highest weight, and makes up 55% of the total score. It’s maintenance score of 8.25 was also lowered due to the expensive ongoing filter replacement cost of \$0.70/ gallon. The Company score was also lowered due to a lack of return window. Y[ou can read the full ZeroWater review here](https://waterfilterguru.com/zerowater-review/) where we dive deep into the data behind each of the scores. [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-4357) 19. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/3731ceddae57603f15ef9e6338d5a439184873912aa8ed5f8abde53487eccd6b?s=50&d=mm&r=g) Dave B [January 21, 2024 at 7:40 pm](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-2277) Is the PUR Plus the only one certified to reduce arsenic? [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-2277) 1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/brian-headshot.jpg) Brian Campbell [January 22, 2024 at 2:50 pm](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-2363) The PUR Plus is not certified to reduce arsenic. I’m not aware of any pitchers that are certified to reduce arsenic, only that have been 3rd party tested to do so [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-2363) 2. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/7f9a78baaa00f833d81b4cd31f172c7979d8a181b21b020c34c1fcf8902d1430?s=50&d=mm&r=g) Jack [December 11, 2024 at 5:12 pm](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-6592) Is the chloroform found in Zero Water a big deal ? I use Zero Water but am now concerned. [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-6592) 1. ![Avatar for Brian Campbell](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/brian-headshot.jpg) Brian Campbell [December 17, 2024 at 11:11 am](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-6621) I don’t think the chloroform, a disinfection byproduct, is coming from the ZeroWater filter itself. Still, the fact it was detected post-filtration indicates ZeroWater may not be the best option for addressing THMs like chloroform [Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#comment-6621) #### Leave a Comment [Cancel Reply](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#respond) [![WaterFilterGuru.com](data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%201024%20217'%3E%3C/svg%3E)![WaterFilterGuru.com](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Logo_medium_white-1024x217.png)](https://waterfilterguru.com/) 600 17th Street Suite 2890 South Denver, CO 80202 ### ABOUT - [About Us](https://waterfilterguru.com/about-us/ "About Us") - [Review Process](https://waterfilterguru.com/editorial-guidelines/#our-methodology) - [How We Test Water Filters](https://waterfilterguru.com/how-we-test-water-filters/) - [Privacy Policy](https://waterfilterguru.com/privacy-policy/ "Privacy Policy") - [Affiliate Disclosure](https://waterfilterguru.com/disclaimer/ "Affiliate Disclosure") - [Terms of Service](https://waterfilterguru.com/terms-of-service/) - [Accessibility Statement](https://waterfilterguru.com/accessibility/) - [Contact Us](https://waterfilterguru.com/contact-us/ "Contact Us") ![WQA member logo](data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%20208%2077'%3E%3C/svg%3E) ![WQA member logo](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/WQALogo.member.horizwhite.png) [![DMCA.com Protection Status](data:image/svg+xml,%3Csvg%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%20100%2020'%3E%3C/svg%3E)![DMCA.com Protection Status](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/dmca-badge-w100-5x1-08.png)](https://www.dmca.com/Protection/Status.aspx?ID=99e4ce09-7fb9-4a66-b840-f231408adcf1 "DMCA.com Protection Status") COPYRIGHT © 2022 WaterFilterGuru.com \\| All Rights Reserved. waterfilterguru.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com, amazon.co.uk or amazon.ca. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Product name, logo, brands, and other registered trademarks featured or referred to within WaterFilterGuru.com are the property of their respective trademark holders. ![](https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=199029834534140&ev=PageView&noscript=1) x x x x x Scroll to Top
Readable Markdown	The best water filter pitchers are affordable, portable, and reduce dozens of contaminants using gravity-fed water filtration. We use our own evidence-based testing to review and compare water filters. I’ve personally tested all the water filters on this list, leveraging my experience as a WQA Certified Water Specialist (CWS) and Certified Water Treatment Representative (CWR) to review each product as both an expert and a customer. ![Culligan ZeroWater pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Culligan-ZeroWater.jpg) Overall Score: 9.33 Culligan ZeroWater Best contaminant reduction performance Most extensively certified Best value for money Easy to set up, no filter priming needed ![Epic Pure Water Filter Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Epic-Pure-Water-Filter-Pitcher.jpg) Overall Score: 8.90 Epic Pure Pitcher Second highest score for contaminant reduction Best value for money Easy to set up, no filter priming needed Affordable ongoing cost ![Clearly Filtered Water Pitcher (400x400)](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Clearly-Filtered-Water-Pitcher-400x400-1.jpg) Overall Score: 8.78 Clearly Filtered Water Pitcher Reduced the most contaminants in our lab tests Highest quality design materials Certified for performance & materials safety Reduced 100% fluoride Table of Contents - [Our Testing & Selection Process](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#Our_Testing_Selection_Process) - [The 5 Best Water Filter Pitchers](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#The_5_Best_Water_Filter_Pitchers) - [Culligan ZeroWater](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#Culligan_ZeroWater) - [Epic Pure Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#Epic_Pure_Pitcher) - [Clearly Filtered Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#Clearly_Filtered_Pitcher) - [Santevia MINA Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#Santevia_MINA_Pitcher) - [LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#LARQ_Pure-Vis_Advanced_Pitcher) - [Filters That Didn’t Make the Cut](https://waterfilterguru.com/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/#Filters_That_Didnt_Make_the_Cut) ## Our Testing & Selection Process How We Test & Score We use a metrics-driven process to test water filters for their performance. Our aim is to evaluate a system’s performance capabilities, value for money, and suitability for a specific situation or intended outcome. For our Best Water Filter Pitchers guide, we cherry-picked the filters that obtained the highest scores across each of our scoring categories, with a particular focus on contaminant reduction. ![scoring factors pie chart](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/scoring-factors-1024x666.png) We scored these pitchers based on how effectively they reduced contaminants in our water, what we thought about their design quality, their ease of setup and maintenance, and more. We also compared filter materials and technologies, and evaluated third-party lab test results when the manufacturer provided them, though these are not scoring factors. To ensure the fairest comparisons, we use fact-based, numerical data whenever we can. But some testing categories require us to conduct our own subjective assessment, giving our personal insight into a specific aspect of a product’s performance. [You can see our complete testing and scoring process here.](https://waterfilterguru.com/how-we-test-water-filters/) How We Choose the Winners To choose the best water filter pitchers, we evaluated all the filters we’ve reviewed and compared their testing data side-by-side. We selected the highest-scoring products, paying close attention to the filters that reduced the most contaminants in our water. The water filter pitchers we’ve recommended each have their own unique filter technologies and produce different outcomes. We aimed to provide enough variety to offer targeted recommendations for specific budgets and situations. We automatically excluded some products from this guide, including: 1\. Countertop dispensers, units that require electricity to operate, and systems that can’t be classed as gravity-fed water filter pitchers. 2\. Filters with availability/stock issues, or those not available in the USA. 3\. Systems that were unable to match up to their competitors due to poorer contaminant reduction performance, those sold by lesser-known or less trustworthy brands, or those offering poorer value on the whole. Article Update History 11/07/2025 – Added Culligan ZeroWater, removed Legacy ZeroWater Culligan ZeroWater ![Culligan ZeroWater](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Culligan-ZeroWater.jpg) The Culligan ZeroWater Pitcher is the highest-scoring water filter pitcher we tested, earning an overall weighted score of 9.33. It removed more contaminants than any other water filter pitcher we tested and was the only product to be certified for 100% of its contaminant reduction claims. It also has a sturdier, better-quality construction than most other pitchers (with the exception of Clearly Filtered), but it did demineralize our water, and it has the highest maintenance cost of all the filters in this list. Overall Score: 9.33 How We Test & Score 9\.65 Contaminant Reduction 9\.40 Design 8\.00 Maintenance 9\.50 Filtration Rate 9\.50 Setup 7\.60 Company Best For The only pitcher to remove 100% of all metals, minerals, and inorganics Higher-quality design than most other pitchers IAPMO certified for 100% of contaminants claimed to reduce Certified for materials safety Fast filtration Product Specs \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Price \| \$24.99+ \| \| Contaminants Reduced \| 25+ \| \| Certifications or Testing \| NSF/ANSI 42, 53, 401 & 372 \| \| Holding Capacity \| 7-40 cups \| \| Filter Lifespan \| 20 gallons \| \| Approx. Annual Cost \| \$160+ \| **Discount: Get 10% off – Click Here for Code ### Our Lab Tests In our Tap Score testing, the [Culligan ZeroWater Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/culligan-zerowater-review/) outperformed all the other water filter pitchers we reviewed, removing 100% of all contaminants with health effects in our water, including uranium and fluoride, both initially detected in concentrations exceeding the HGL. It also eliminated sulfate, chlorine, nitrate, zinc, copper, strontium, barium, and molybdenum. [![Made with Flourish](https://public.flourish.studio/resources/made_with_flourish.svg)](https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/26096129/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation/26096129) [![Made with Flourish](https://public.flourish.studio/resources/made_with_flourish.svg)](https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/26096100/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation/26096100) ZeroWater filters use a dual ion exchange process, which greatly reduces or removes all charged ions. As a result, we also saw reductions or eliminations of carbonate, calcium, magnesium, bicarbonate, sodium, and hardness. The pH of our water was reduced from 7.6 (slightly alkaline) to 6.6 (slightly acidic), leading to a lower aesthetics score of 8.00. Since a big part of the filter’s marketing is its ability to reduce TDS down to 0, there’s no included remineralization media to mitigate these effects. Overall, though, the pitcher still earned the highest contaminant reduction score on this list (9.65), partly due to its exceptional health-related contaminant reduction and partly because it’s the only pitcher to have IAPMO certifications to [NSF 42](https://pld.iapmo.org/file_info.asp?file_no=0017154), [NSF 53](https://pld.iapmo.org/file_info.asp?file_no=0017154), and [NSF 401](https://pld.iapmo.org/file_info.asp?file_no=0017156), for every single contaminant that it’s claimed to reduce. ### Other Scoring Factors ![Culligan ZeroWater Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Culligan-ZeroWater-Pitcher.jpg) When we consider just how thoroughly the Culligan ZeroWater Pitcher filtered our water, its filtration rate of 1.9 GPH (gallons per hour) is pretty impressive. It’s not the fastest filter on this list – Epic Pure, Clearly Filtered, and the legacy ZeroWater were quicker – but it still took just 7 minutes to filter a full pitcher of water, earning it a score of 9.50.** Where Culligan ZeroWater did come out on top was in the design category, with a high score of 9.40. Most of the other pitchers we tested had construction issues, with thin, flimsy-feeling plastic. The Culligan ZeroWater pitcher feels sturdy, and it’s IAPMO certified for materials safety and [lead-free design](https://pld.iapmo.org/file_info.asp?file_no=0017157). You can choose from several pitcher sizes and capacities, from the smallest 7-cup model to the largest 40-cup glass dispenser. We were able to get the pitcher set up and ready to use in less than 5 minutes, earning it a high setup score of 9.50. But it had the highest filter replacement cost of all the filters we tested for this review (\$0.90, based on its 20-gallon capacity, as outlined in its certification listing), resulting in the lowest maintenance score of just 8.00. Looking at Culligan’s company policies, the 90-day warranty is one of the lowest we’ve seen for a water filter pitcher, and you’ll have to pay for shipping unless you spend more than \$99 on your order. The ambiguous returns policy (each return is treated “uniquely”) was also a letdown, contributing to its company score of 7.60. \| Criteria \| Results \| \|---\|---\| \| Overall Score \| 9\.33 \| \| Health Related Contaminants \| 9\.70 \| \| Aesthetic Related Contaminants \| 8\.00 \| \| Performance Certification \| NSF/ANSI 42, 53, 401 \| \| Filtration Rate \| 1\.9 GPH \| \| Component Quality \| Excellent \| \| Component Certification \| NSF/ANSI 42, 53, 401 & 372 \| \| Setup \| Outstanding \| \| Servicing Requirements \| Exceptional \| \| Costs \| \$0.90/ gallon \| \| Warranty Length \| 90 days \| \| Shipping \| Free shipping within the continental US on orders above \$99 \| \| Returns \| Limited returns \| Epic Pure Pitcher ![Epic Pure Water Filter Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Epic-Pure-Water-Filter-Pitcher.jpg) The Epic Pure Pitcher uses a solid carbon block filter that blends three activated carbon media to reduce dozens of common drinking water contaminants. It got the best contaminant score out of all the water filter pitchers we tested, and we were pleased with its quick and easy setup and maintenance processes. Overall Score: 8.90 How We Test & Score 9\.00 Contaminant Reduction 6\.00 Design 9\.50 Maintenance 10\.00 Filtration Rate 9\.50 Setup 8\.95 Company Best For Reduced all contaminants to below the HGL benchmark Contaminant reduction score wasn’t compromised by the introduction of unwanted impurities Best value for money Option to upgrade to dispenser with a larger water-holding capacity Super easy setup with no filter priming required Product Specs \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Price \| \$70.00 \| \| Contaminants Reduced \| 200+ \| \| Certifications \| Not certified \| \| Process \| Solid Activated Carbon Block \| \| Filter Capacity \| 150 gallons \| \| Annual Cost \| ~\$150 \| \| Warranty \| Lifetime \| Why It’s Best The [Epic Pure Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/epic-pure-water-filter-review/) is the best overall water filter pitcher because it secured the best score for contaminant reduction. In our testing, it reduced all health-related contaminants in our water to below the testing lab’s Health Guideline Levels (HGLs), and, unlike with some of the other pitchers we tested, no unwanted impurities appeared post-filtration. Plus, it’s one of the best-value water filter pitchers we tested, costing less than \$70 upfront and boasting a super affordable ongoing cost. Good to Know: Epic sells two water filter pitchers: the Epic Pure and the Epic Nano. The Epic Pure (which we’re reviewing here) is intended for filtering city tap water, while the Epic Nano filter is designed for untreated surface or well water. **Discount: Get 20% off – Click Here for Code Epic Pure Performance The Epic Pure scored a 9.30 for reducing health-related contaminants in our water. Our test results showed that the filter reduced 100% uranium, copper, and phosphorous, as well as 92% sulfate, 57% molybdenum, 41% barium, 27% fluoride, and 20% nitrate. [![Made with Flourish](https://public.flourish.studio/resources/made_with_flourish.svg)](https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/17159127/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation/17159127) [![Made with Flourish](https://public.flourish.studio/resources/made_with_flourish.svg)](https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/17159109/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation/17159109) The system also reduced 100% chlorine in our water, so it scored a 9.90 for improving our water’s aesthetics. Our only disappointment was that the filter isn’t performance certified, which reduced its score slightly. The Epic Pure also impressed us with its setup and maintenance requirements – we awarded it a score of 9.50 for both categories. Setup was easy because the filter didn’t need priming; we just washed and assembled the pitcher and reservoir, then filtered and discarded the first two pitchers of water. We calculated the pitcher’s ongoing maintenance cost as \$0.31/ gallon, meaning that we’d spend half as much as some of the other top-performing pitchers we tested. Replacing the filter was easy, and the 150-gallon filter capacity is one of the best we’ve seen. The pitcher has an LED countdown timer that helped us to know when to buy new filters. We think the Epic Pure is the best water filter pitcher for folks who want an all-rounder that can effectively reduce a range of contaminants, even though not all contaminants were completely eliminated. Anyone who wants a filter that’s affordable and easy to set up and maintain should also be pleased with the Epic Pure pitcher. \| Criteria \| Results \| \|---\|---\| \| Overall Score \| 8\.90 \| \| Health Related Contaminants \| 9\.30 \| \| Aesthetic Related Contaminants \| 9\.90 \| \| Performance Certification \| Not Certified \| \| Filtration Rate \| 2\.23 GPH \| \| Component Quality \| Unsatisfactory \| \| Component Certification \| Not Certified \| \| Setup \| Outstanding \| \| Servicing Requirements \| Outstanding \| \| Costs \| \$0.31/ gallon \| \| Warranty Length \| Lifetime \| \| Shipping \| Free shipping for the Clean Water Club only \| \| Returns \| Lifetime \| Clearly Filtered Pitcher ![Clearly Filtered water pitcher (400x400)](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Clearly-Filtered-Water-Pitcher.png) The Clearly Filtered Water Pitcher reduced more contaminants than most other water filter pitchers we’ve tested, and it has an advantage over the Epic Pure pitcher: a WQA performance certification for chlorine and PFOA/PFOS reduction. Overall Score: 8.78 How We Test & Score 8\.24 Contaminant Reduction 9\.70 Design 8\.75 Maintenance 10\.00 Filtration Rate 9\.50 Setup 9\.00 Company Best For Thorough water filtration WQA performance certified Sturdy, durable design Long 100-gallon filter life Roomy 10-cup capacity Product Specs \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Price \| \$90.00 \| \| Contaminants Reduced \| 350+ \| \| Certifications \| NSF/ANSI 42 & 53 \| \| Process \| Coconut Carbon Block \| \| Filter Capacity \| 100 gallons \| \| Annual Cost \| ~\$150 \| \| Warranty \| 1 year \| What We Thought The [Clearly Filtered Water Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/clearly-filtered-water-pitcher-review/) is the water filter pitcher that we recommend for folks who want a system with a great overall contaminant reduction performance. It offered a greater contaminant reduction percentage than most similar systems in our testing, and we also noted that the pitcher materials felt sturdier and thicker than other pitchers, which felt flimsier and thinner in comparison. Setup was also really easy for the Clearly Filtered pitcher. Rather than having to filter and discard several batches of water (which is time-consuming), we primed the filter using the included priming bag, which took less than 10 minutes. Discount: Get 10% off – Click Here for Code Clearly Filtered Performance We awarded the Clearly Filtered Pitcher a score of 8.24 for overall contaminant reduction. It did better than the Epic Pure at reducing 100% fluoride, and its 100% uranium, chlorine, and copper reduction matched Epic’s results. [![Made with Flourish](https://public.flourish.studio/resources/made_with_flourish.svg)](https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/17080093/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation/17080093) The CF pitcher also reduced 86% barium, 67% strontium, and 53% molybdenum. But its score was affected by the presence of 0.0054 PPM of cobalt in our filtered water (it hadn’t been detected pre-filtration). [![Made with Flourish](https://public.flourish.studio/resources/made_with_flourish.svg)](https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/17080119/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation/17080119) There were two standout performance features that gave Clearly Filtered the edge over Epic: its WQA performance certifications and its high-quality plastic design. The pitcher has been certified (to NSF Standards [42](https://find.wqa.org/find-products/ctl/detail/mid/1054/cid/clearly_filtered_inc/sid/1?keyword=clearly+filtered) and [53](https://find.wqa.org/find-products/ctl/detail/mid/1054/cid/clearly_filtered_inc/sid/3?keyword=clearly+filtered)) to reduce 3 out of the 365+ contaminants it’s claimed to reduce, so it’s not the most impressive proof of performance that we’ve seen, but it’s still more reassuring than nothing. ![Clearly filtered pitcher parts](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Clearly-Filtered-pitcher-parts.jpg) As for design, the Clearly Filtered pitcher got a score of 9.70. The pitcher is made from BPA-free Tritan plastic and is [WQA certified for lead-free design](https://find.wqa.org/find-products/ctl/detail/mid/1054/cid/clearly_filtered_inc/sid/29?keyword=clearly+filtered), on top of holding a materials safety certification as a component of its performance certifications. We timed the filtration process and recorded that the CF pitcher filtered 0.5 gallons of water in 13 minutes and 12 seconds, giving it a 2.27 GPH filtration rate. This put it slightly ahead of the Epic Pure, which had a 2.23 GPH filtration rate – but both filters got the top score here. We think the Clearly Filtered Pitcher makes the most sense for people who are happy to pay a slightly higher upfront and ongoing cost to effectively address many contaminants in their water with a system that’s certified for performance and materials safety. \| Criteria \| Results \| \|---\|---\| \| Overall Score \| 8\.78 \| \| Health Related Contaminants \| 8\.30 \| \| Aesthetic Related Contaminants \| 9\.90 \| \| Performance Certification \| Certified for \<1% of reduction claims \| \| Filtration Rate \| 2\.27 GPH \| \| Component Quality \| Outstanding \| \| Component Certification \| Certified \| \| Setup \| Outstanding \| \| Servicing Requirements \| Outstanding \| \| Costs \| \$0.55/ gallon \| \| Warranty Length \| 1 year \| \| Shipping \| Free shipping \| \| Returns \| 30 days \| Santevia MINA Pitcher ![Santevia MINA Alkaline Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Santevia-MINA-Alkaline-Pitcher-1024x983.jpg) The Santevia MINA Pitcher is the only alkalizing water filter pitcher to make our list. It did a great job of reducing many contaminants in our water, and we were impressed with its ability to raise water pH by up to 2.0** (although our own results varied – more on that later). Overall Score: 8.45 How We Test & Score 8\.12 Contaminant Reduction 8\.10 Design 9\.75 Maintenance 8\.50 Filtration Rate 9\.50 Setup 7\.95 Company Best For Reducing contaminants and increasing water’s alkalinity & pH Budget-friendly – costs less than \$50 upfront Easy to maintain Product Specs \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Price \| \$49.99 \| \| Contaminants Reduced \| 85 \| \| Certifications \| Not certified \| \| Process \| Carbon + Ion Exchange + Remineralization \| \| Filter Capacity \| 80 gallons \| \| Annual Cost \| ~\$120 \| \| Warranty \| 90 days \| Why We Liked It The [Santevia MINA](https://waterfilterguru.com/santevia-mina-review/) was the best alkalizing water filter pitcher we tested, being the only filter to reduce healthy contaminants and increase the pH and alkalinity of water. It’s also the most affordable of all the pitchers we’ve mentioned in this guide so far, falling within the \$0-\$50 price bracket, and with an ongoing cost of just \$0.25/ gallon – impressive given that it provides an additional water quality advantage that none of the other systems offer. Santevia MINA Performance The Santevia MINA pitcher’s overall contaminant reduction score was 8.12, putting it only slightly behind Clearly Filtered and Epic Pure. It reduced 7 contaminants in our water: 100% chlorine, uranium, molybdenum, and copper, 78% barium, 77% nitrate, and 72% strontium. [![Made with Flourish](https://public.flourish.studio/resources/made_with_flourish.svg)](https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/16832087/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation/16832087) However, the MINA pitcher isn’t performance-certified, which affected its overall score in this category. Plus, fluoride actually increased slightly from 1.1 PPM to 1.2 PPM, telling us that the filter doesn’t effectively address this contaminant. [![Made with Flourish](https://public.flourish.studio/resources/made_with_flourish.svg)](https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/16832109/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation/16832109) Santevia’s main selling point is its ability to increase the alkalinity of water, which has a [few possible health benefits](https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/nutrition-and-healthy-eating/expert-answers/alkaline-water/faq-20058029). When we first got the pitcher, we used a pH meter to test our water. The unfiltered water had a 7.89 pH, and our filtered water’s pH had increased to 9.94. However, when we tested the pitcher later with a lab test, pH only increased by 0.1, from 7.4 to 7.5. ![Testing the pH level of water after filtration with Santevia MINA Alkaline Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Testing-the-pH-level-of-water-after-filtration-with-Santevia-MINA-Alkaline-Pitcher.jpg) [![Made with Flourish](https://public.flourish.studio/resources/made_with_flourish.svg)](https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/17090369/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation/17090369) The system got an 8.50 score from us for its filtration rate. It filtered 0.383 gallons of water in just over 16 minutes, giving it a filtration rate of 1.43 GPH – around 1 GPM slower than most other pitchers we tested. We couldn’t fault the filter setup process. It also got a 9.50 in this category because assembly took less than 5 minutes – we just had to wash and assemble the pitcher, then hold the filter under running water for 1 minute until the water ran clear. We think the Santevia MINA pitcher is a great fit for folks who want to go a step further than simply reducing contaminants in their water, and anyone who wants the possible taste and health benefits of filtered water with an alkaline pH. \| Criteria \| Results \| \|---\|---\| \| Overall Score \| 8\.45 \| \| Health Related Contaminants \| 8\.30 \| \| Aesthetic Related Contaminants \| 9\.50 \| \| Performance Certification \| Not certified \| \| Filtration Rate \| 1\.43 GPH \| \| Component Quality \| Outstanding \| \| Component Certification \| Not certified \| \| Setup \| Outstanding \| \| Servicing Requirements \| Outstanding \| \| Costs \| \$0.25/ gallon \| \| Warranty Length \| 90 days \| \| Shipping \| Free shipping on orders over \$99, except Hawaii, Puerto Rico & Alaska \| \| Returns \| 30 days \| LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced Pitcher ![LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/LARQ-Pure-Vis-Advanced-Pitcher.png) The LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced Pitcher filters and purifies water with a unique 2-stage process involving a filter cartridge and a UV wand. It reduced numerous contaminants in our testing, and we thought it had the most attractive design of all the water filter pitchers we tested. Overall Score: 8.21 How We Test & Score 8\.14 Contaminant Reduction 8\.10 Design 9\.00 Maintenance 7\.00 Filtration Rate 9\.00 Setup 8\.35 Company Best For Prevents bacteria growth with UV disinfection Attractive, quality design Easy assembly and maintenance The only high-tech pitcher we reviewed Product Specs \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Price \| \$139.00 \| \| Contaminants Reduced \| 60+ \| \| Certifications \| Not Certified \| \| Process \| Activated Carbon + UV Purification \| \| Filter Capacity \| 60 gallons \| \| Annual Cost \| ~\$150 \| \| Warranty \| 1 year \| Our Take The LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced Pitcher is the most expensive water filter pitcher we’ve tried, but it’s the only pitcher with a unique UV purification stage to prevent bacterial growth in the filtered water chamber. The pitcher’s filtration performance wasn’t far off Clearly Filtered’s – it got the same score in our lab testing, but it doesn’t have a performance certification. LARQ Pure-Vis Performance We awarded the LARQ Pure-Vis pitcher an 8.14 for contaminant reduction. It did a great job of removing 100% uranium, barium, strontium, and molybdenum, and reducing 97% copper, 88% sulfate, and 20% nitrate. Unfortunately, it didn’t reduce fluoride in our water at all. [![Made with Flourish](https://public.flourish.studio/resources/made_with_flourish.svg)](https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/17078952/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation/17078952) [![Made with Flourish](https://public.flourish.studio/resources/made_with_flourish.svg)](https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/17078910/?utm_source=embed&utm_campaign=visualisation/17078910) The Pure-Vis pitcher’s UV purification stage is the biggest reason why we were drawn to the system. Microorganisms aren’t present in treated city water, but a number of studies (including [this study on Brita water filter pitchers](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8740859/)) have found that microorganisms can grow in filter media. The LARQ pitcher provides protection against bacteria growth in the filter media and the pitcher chamber, so we didn’t have to wash it out as often as the other pitchers. The system did well in the setup and maintenance categories, with scores of 9.00 in each. Setup was a bit more involved – we had to soak the filter for 10 minutes before installing it, charge the battery pack for the UV wand, and install the app. Maintenance required the same filter soaking and UV wand charging (but the battery lasts around 1 month on a full charge). We estimated the filter’s ongoing cost as \$0.54/ gallon, so it’s about on par with the Clearly Filtered pitcher – not the cheapest, but not as costly as Culligan ZeroWater. As for design, the LARQ pitcher felt like it was made from the same high-quality materials as Clearly Filtered. It felt thick, solid, and durable, and more capable of withstanding long-term use than the other pitchers we tested. ![LARQ Pure-Vis Advanced pitcher components](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/LARQ-Pure-Vis-Advanced-pitcher-components.jpg) In our opinion, the LARQ Pure-Vis pitcher is ideal for anyone who has concerns about biofilm growth and microorganisms in their filter media and the pitcher vessel itself, and folks who want the reassurance of filtering and purifying their water at the same time. \| Criteria \| Results \| \|---\|---\| \| Overall Score \| 8\.21 \| \| Health Related Contaminants \| 8\.30 \| \| Aesthetic Related Contaminants \| 9\.90 \| \| Performance Certification \| Not Certified \| \| Filtration Rate \| 0\.60 GPH \| \| Component Quality \| Outstanding \| \| Component Certification \| Not Certified \| \| Setup \| Excellent \| \| Servicing Requirements \| Exceptional \| \| Costs \| \$0.54/ gallon \| \| Warranty Length \| 1 year \| \| Shipping \| Free on orders over \$80 within the contiguous US \| \| Returns \| 30 days, but only if unopened \| ## Filters That Didn’t Make the Cut We want to close off this review with a quick mention of the other three pitchers we tested, which received lower performance scores than the rest and therefore didn’t make the cut. These were: - [The PUR Plus Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/pur-water-filter-pitcher-review/) - [The Brita Elite Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/brita-elite-water-filter-pitcher-review/) - [The Waterdrop Chubby Pitcher](https://waterfilterguru.com/waterdrop-chubby-review/) These filters all got poorer contaminant reduction scores: the PUR Plus got 5.28; the Brita Elite got 4.29; and the Waterdrop Chubby got 4.24. None of the pitchers are tested or certified to reduce most of the contaminants (like uranium, fluoride, and molybdenum) in our water. So we were unsurprised when the pitchers did a poor job of reducing these contaminants. Our testing outcomes don’t necessarily mean that the filters are incapable of reducing contaminants; just that they couldn’t address our own water quality concerns. If we’d tested the filters with water predominantly containing contaminants they could address, the contaminant reduction scores would likely have been higher. That’s why testing your water before buying a filter is so important: you want to ensure that the system you choose can effectively address your unique water quality issues. ![Brian Campbell headshot](https://waterfilterguru.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/brian-headshot.jpg) President & CEO, CWS, CWR Brian Campbell, a WQA Certified Water Specialist (CWS) and Certified Water Treatment Representative (CWR) with 5+ years of experience, helps homeowners navigate the world of water treatment. After honing his skills at Hach Company, he founded his business to empower homeowners with the knowledge and tools to achieve safe, healthy water. Brian's tested countless devices, from simple pitchers to complex systems, helping his readers find the perfect fit for their unique needs.
Shard	153 (laksa)
Root Hash	8543287158922557553
Unparsed URL	com,waterfilterguru!/best-water-filter-pitcher-reviews/ s443