🕷️ Crawler Inspector

URL Lookup

Direct Parameter Lookup

Raw Queries and Responses

1. Shard Calculation

Query:

Response:

Calculated Shard: 39 (from laksa064)

2. Crawled Status Check

Query:

curl -X POST \
  'http://laksa039.int.ahrefs:8124/' \
  -H 'Content-Type: text/plain' \
  -H 'X-ClickHouse-Database: crawler3' \
  -H 'Authorization: Basic YXBpOg==' \
  -d 'SELECT getAhrefsURLFromUnparsed(src_unparsed) AS found_url, ifNull(toUnixTimestamp(download_stamp), 0) AS crawl_time, ifNull(toUnixTimestamp(props_url_first_seen), 0) AS first_indexed_time, download_http_code AS http_code, src_unparsed AS src_unparsed, src_root_hash AS src_root_hash, history_drop_reason AS history_drop_reason, meta_title AS meta_title, meta_descriptions AS meta_descriptions, attrs_boilerpipe_text AS attrs_boilerpipe_text, attrs_markdown AS attrs_markdown, attrs_readable_markdown AS attrs_readable_markdown, meta_canonical AS meta_canonical, ml_categories_json AS ml_categories_json, ml_types_json AS ml_types_json, ml_intent_types_json AS ml_intent_types_json, meta_language AS meta_language, attrs_author AS attrs_author, ifNull(toUnixTimestamp(attrs_publish_time), 0) AS attrs_publish_time, ifNull(toUnixTimestamp(attrs_original_publish_time), 0) AS attrs_original_publish_time, ifNull(attrs_is_republished, 0) AS attrs_is_republished, ifNull(attrs_nr_words, 0) AS attrs_nr_words, ifNull(attrs_boilerpipe_nr_words, 0) AS attrs_boilerpipe_nr_words, ifNull(body_ext_links_number, 0) AS body_ext_links_number, ifNull(body_int_links_number, 0) AS body_int_links_number, ifNull(meta_nofollow, 0) AS meta_nofollow, ifNull(meta_noarchive, 0) AS meta_noarchive, ifNull(props_was_rendered, 0) AS props_was_rendered, ifNull(src_redirect, \'\') AS src_redirect, ifNull(download_time_msec, 0) AS download_time_msec, ifNull(download_ttfb_msec, 0) AS download_ttfb_msec, ifNull(download_size, 0) AS download_size FROM crawler3.page_info_local FINAL PREWHERE (src_root_hash, src_unparsed) IN ((getAhrefsRootHashFromUnparsed(getAhrefsUnparsedNoserviceFromURL(\'https://time.com/6898943/is-covid-19-still-pandemic-2024/\')), getAhrefsUnparsedNoserviceFromURL(\'https://time.com/6898943/is-covid-19-still-pandemic-2024/\'))) FORMAT JSONEachRow'

Response:

{"found_url":"https:\/\/time.com\/6898943\/is-covid-19-still-pandemic-2024\/","crawl_time":1776250098,"first_indexed_time":1710167578,"http_code":200,"src_unparsed":"com,time!\/6898943\/is-covid-19-still-pandemic-2024\/ s443","src_root_hash":"9797552172251460839","history_drop_reason":null,"meta_title":"Is COVID-19 Still a Pandemic?","meta_descriptions":["The WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic on March 11, 2020. Four years later, in 2024, is COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 still a pandemic?"],"attrs_boilerpipe_text":"As a health journalist, I've written the phrase “the COVID-19 pandemic” more times than I care to count in the four years since the World Health Organization (WHO)\nfirst used that term on March 11, 2020\n. But lately, the word “pandemic” has given me pause.\nMaybe you’ve noticed it too: these days, a lot of people refer to the pandemic in the past tense. “During COVID,” they say, or, “when we were in the pandemic.” The implication is that the virus is gone and the pandemic is over.\nThe former is clearly untrue. The SARS-CoV-2 virus still\nkills thousands of people around the world\neach month, saddles still more with chronic symptoms\nknown as Long COVID\n, and continues to evolve, with the highly transmissible\nJN.1 variant\nrecently causing waves of infection across the globe.\nBut are we still a pandemic? No one seems to know for sure.\nWhen I asked Dr. Mandy Cohen, director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), she didn’t give a direct answer. “Rather than getting caught up in the semantics of it,” she says, people should feel confident that “we are outside of the emergency [phase]. But I don’t want folks to forget that COVID is still here and still poses a risk.”\nEven Maria Van Kerkhove, director of epidemic and pandemic prevention and preparedness at the WHO, admitted that the issue is a “confusing” one. The WHO continues to\ndescribe COVID-19 as a pandemic on its website\n. Van Kerkhove says that’s reasonable given the virus’ continued global presence, even though we are no longer in the crisis state we were in 2020—but, she says, there’s no definitive, yes-or-no conclusion about whether that’s the right term to use.\n“There is no universal, agreed definition of what a pandemic is,” Van Kerkhove says. “If you asked 100 epidemiologists to define what a pandemic is, or, ‘Are we currently in a pandemic?’, you’d get a lot of different answers.”\nWhat’s a pandemic, anyway?\nEpidemiologists consider a disease “endemic” when it spreads in a consistent way, as the flu does each winter in the Northern Hemisphere. An endemic level of disease is the baseline amount for a particular area, which might not be zero but is at least predictable. If a disease suddenly causes a higher-than-average number of cases in a set area, the situation becomes an “epidemic.”\nThe definition for a “pandemic”—when an epidemic crosses borders, infecting lots of people across multiple countries or continents—is perhaps the squishiest of all.\nCalling something a pandemic is essentially a “judgment call,” because “there isn’t a precise number” of cases, hospitalizations, deaths, or affected countries that definitively denotes one, says Dr. Jonathan Quick, an adjunct professor at the Duke Global Health Institute and author of\nThe End of Epidemics\n. “Anybody who gives you a precise number is just pulling it out of their head.”\nUsing that label is, in some ways, as much a political and public-relations decision as it is an epidemiological one. “If you’re trying to really reduce the number of deaths, you’ve got to be very strategic in what you do,” says Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota. Language is part of the calculus, in that it can spur action from officials and the public alike.\nBut, technically speaking, labeling something a pandemic has no immediate policy implications. Even the\nWHO does not formally declare pandemics\n. The agency’s highest official level of alert is a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC), a designation meant to mobilize a global, coordinated response. (The PHEIC related to COVID-19 started in January 2020 and ended in May 2023, the same month the\nU.S. government stopped calling the virus a public-health emergency\n.)\nBut, Van Kerkhove says, PHEIC is \"not a good acronym. It doesn’t evoke the kind of action like the word 'pandemic' does.”\nRepresentatives from WHO member countries around the world are working on a formal definition of a pandemic—four years after COVID-19 came onto the scene—as part of a wider effort to strengthen global pandemic preparedness. An alleged recent draft, which was\npublished in February\nby Health Policy Watch, is a mouthful: “the global spread of a pathogen or variant that infects human populations with limited or no immunity through sustained and high transmissibility from person to person, overwhelming health systems with severe morbidity and high mortality and causing social and economic disruptions, all of which requires effective national and global collaboration and coordination for its control.” (A WHO spokesperson declined to confirm the legitimacy of that draft definition, but said a new draft of the group's work is set to be published this week.)\nThat reported definition doesn’t include numbers, but it does lay out more precise ground rules for what constitutes a pandemic. The pathogen in question must be contagious, novel—since humans don’t have significant preexisting immunity to it—and virulent enough to cause lots of death and disease, overwhelming health systems and disrupting society in the process.\nIs COVID-19 still a pandemic, or is it endemic?\nUnder those terms, SARS-CoV-2 still has some pandemic-y features. It’s still highly transmissible and circulating widely in countries around the world, and it remains a major cause of\ndeath\nand disability globally.\nBut it isn’t novel anymore, says Katherine Xue, a postdoctoral fellow at Stanford University who has studied viral evolution. The majority of the world’s\npopulation now has some immunity\nto the virus through vaccination, prior infection, or both, which means that “even a new viral variant is probably not going to be able to infect everybody” in the way the original strain could in 2020, she says.\nCOVID-19’s spread isn’t perfectly predictable—new variants are emerging all the time, causing spikes in infections all year round\nrather than seasonally\n—but it is consistently circulating around the world. To Xue, that means it’s fair to call it endemic. “The picture of COVID that we have now is probably going to be very similar to what we have four years from now, [whereas] the way we dealt with COVID was very different four years ago,” she says. “The rate of change is different.”\nCOVID-19 also does not overwhelm health systems in the way it once did. Today, with masks, tests, vaccines, and treatments available to some extent around the world, fewer people develop severe disease, and it’s easier to care for those who do. The virus continues to kill people and cause Long COVID, but global death rates are\nway down from their peaks\n.\nDr. Robert Wachter, chair of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, has stopped using the word “pandemic,” which he says was a “shorthand way to convey to the public” that COVID-19 constituted a worldwide emergency that required a global shift in behavior. But calling it a pandemic now “just doesn’t feel right,” he says. In his opinion, we’ve been out of the pandemic phase for about a year, given the widespread availability of tests, treatments, and vaccines.\nSo what’s the word to use now? Experts interviewed for this story were hesitant to pick one. “We really don’t have the language for things that are somewhere between flus and cold viruses and pandemics,\" Quick says.\nDoes the label matter?\nIt may seem purely semantic, but ambiguity over the p-word has political and public-health implications. While many countries use other labels, like emergency declarations, to unlock funding and trigger coordinated governmental responses to a crisis, calling something a pandemic—even informally—has gravitas. And saying one has ended implies, rightfully or not, that the threat is gone, which may have trickle-down effects on research funding, disease-prevention efforts, and policies around sick leave and public services.\nThat may be why public-health experts are so loath to take a firm stance. “I would be worried if the headline of your story is, ‘WHO Says We’re No Longer In a Pandemic,’” Van Kerkhove told me. “That would have a different level of meaning from a political point of view.”\nSaying a pandemic is over also sends a message to the public that they can move on—assuming, of course, that they haven’t already. Only about 20% of U.S. adults got the latest vaccine, and a similarly small percentage said they were worried about COVID-19 going into this past holiday season,\naccording to KFF data from late 2023\n. Lots of people stopped paying attention long before COVID-19’s four-year anniversary, and “the pandemic is over for them” regardless of how much experts debate the right vocabulary to use, Osterholm says.\nContrast that with the\ndaily lives of people who remain especially vulnerable\nto the disease— including those who are elderly, immunocompromised, or coping with Long COVID—and it can feel like we’re living in separate timelines, Osterholm says. “Is the pandemic over for some people earlier than it is for others?” Osterholm says. “That doesn’t seem to make sense. That’s kind of like saying that there’s two different temperatures in Minneapolis in one night.”\nStill, even Osterholm wouldn’t say which view is the right one, or when a pandemic is definitively over. “I couldn’t answer it for you,” he says.\nReconciling those different realities is unlikely at this point. And to Quick, that’s okay. “The key messaging is not about terminology, but about what behaviors are appropriate,” he says.\nFor people who still observe the pandemic, those behaviors won’t be at all surprising. Experts recommend getting vaccinated,\nstaying home when you’re actively sick\n, getting tested and\ntreated if necessary\n, and considering additional precautions like wearing a mask and improving ventilation. But with emergency declarations expired, mandates gone, and public guidance relaxing, whether you choose to do those things is now largely up to you. “We’re in a different place with COVID,” CDC director Cohen says.\nIs that place a pandemic? It seems that’s also up to you.","attrs_markdown":"[Skip to Content](https:\/\/time.com\/6898943\/is-covid-19-still-pandemic-2024\/#maincontent)\n\n- Menu\n  \n  Close\n\n[Subscribe](https:\/\/time.com\/subscribe-header-time\/)\n\n- [Health](https:\/\/time.com\/section\/health\/)\n- [COVID-19](https:\/\/time.com\/tag\/covid-19\/)\n# Experts Can't Agree If We're Still in a Pandemic\n[ADD TIME ON GOOGLE](https:\/\/www.google.com\/preferences\/source?q=https:\/\/time.com)\n\nShow me more content from TIME on Google Search\n\n![Jamie Ducharme](https:\/\/gcp-na-images.contentstack.com\/v3\/assets\/bltea6093859af6183b\/bltee90d03f171c21c6\/698a0b45db2987baea2650e7\/200115_Time_Headshots_Day451258.jpg?branch=production&width=3840&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1%3A1)\n\nby\n\n[Jamie Ducharme](https:\/\/time.com\/author\/jamie-ducharme\/)\n\nDucharme is a contributor to TIME.\n\nUpdated:\n\nJan 19, 2026 1:32 PM CUT\n\nPublished:\n\nMar 11, 2024 2:20 PM CUT\n\n![Abstract image of end to corona virus emergency](https:\/\/gcp-na-images.contentstack.com\/v3\/assets\/bltea6093859af6183b\/blt912cc269255fdc5e\/698a493e457a5278b4d68e49\/covid-19-pandemic.jpg?branch=production&width=3840&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=3%3A2)\n\nAbstract image of end to corona virus emergency\n\nAbstract image of end to corona virus emergencyGetty Images\n\n![Jamie Ducharme](https:\/\/gcp-na-images.contentstack.com\/v3\/assets\/bltea6093859af6183b\/bltee90d03f171c21c6\/698a0b45db2987baea2650e7\/200115_Time_Headshots_Day451258.jpg?branch=production&width=3840&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1%3A1)\n\nby\n\n[Jamie Ducharme](https:\/\/time.com\/author\/jamie-ducharme\/)\n\nDucharme is a contributor to TIME.\n\nUpdated:\n\nJan 19, 2026 1:32 PM CUT\n\nPublished:\n\nMar 11, 2024 2:20 PM CUT\n\nAs a health journalist, I've written the phrase “the COVID-19 pandemic” more times than I care to count in the four years since the World Health Organization (WHO) [first used that term on March 11, 2020](https:\/\/time.com\/5791661\/who-coronavirus-pandemic-declaration\/ \"undefined\"). But lately, the word “pandemic” has given me pause.\n\nMaybe you’ve noticed it too: these days, a lot of people refer to the pandemic in the past tense. “During COVID,” they say, or, “when we were in the pandemic.” The implication is that the virus is gone and the pandemic is over.\n\nThe former is clearly untrue. The SARS-CoV-2 virus still [kills thousands of people around the world](https:\/\/data.who.int\/dashboards\/covid19\/deaths?n=c \"undefined\") each month, saddles still more with chronic symptoms [known as Long COVID](https:\/\/time.com\/6835566\/what-are-long-covid-symptoms\/ \"undefined\"), and continues to evolve, with the highly transmissible [JN.1 variant](https:\/\/time.com\/6548748\/jn1-covid-variant\/ \"undefined\") recently causing waves of infection across the globe.\n\nBut are we still a pandemic? No one seems to know for sure.\n\nWhen I asked Dr. Mandy Cohen, director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), she didn’t give a direct answer. “Rather than getting caught up in the semantics of it,” she says, people should feel confident that “we are outside of the emergency \\[phase\\]. But I don’t want folks to forget that COVID is still here and still poses a risk.”\n\nEven Maria Van Kerkhove, director of epidemic and pandemic prevention and preparedness at the WHO, admitted that the issue is a “confusing” one. The WHO continues to [describe COVID-19 as a pandemic on its website](https:\/\/www.who.int\/europe\/emergencies\/situations\/covid-19 \"undefined\"). Van Kerkhove says that’s reasonable given the virus’ continued global presence, even though we are no longer in the crisis state we were in 2020—but, she says, there’s no definitive, yes-or-no conclusion about whether that’s the right term to use.\n\nAdvertisement\n\n“There is no universal, agreed definition of what a pandemic is,” Van Kerkhove says. “If you asked 100 epidemiologists to define what a pandemic is, or, ‘Are we currently in a pandemic?’, you’d get a lot of different answers.”\n\n## What’s a pandemic, anyway?\nEpidemiologists consider a disease “endemic” when it spreads in a consistent way, as the flu does each winter in the Northern Hemisphere. An endemic level of disease is the baseline amount for a particular area, which might not be zero but is at least predictable. If a disease suddenly causes a higher-than-average number of cases in a set area, the situation becomes an “epidemic.”\n\nThe definition for a “pandemic”—when an epidemic crosses borders, infecting lots of people across multiple countries or continents—is perhaps the squishiest of all.\n\nCalling something a pandemic is essentially a “judgment call,” because “there isn’t a precise number” of cases, hospitalizations, deaths, or affected countries that definitively denotes one, says Dr. Jonathan Quick, an adjunct professor at the Duke Global Health Institute and author of *The End of Epidemics*. “Anybody who gives you a precise number is just pulling it out of their head.”\n\nAdvertisement\n\nUsing that label is, in some ways, as much a political and public-relations decision as it is an epidemiological one. “If you’re trying to really reduce the number of deaths, you’ve got to be very strategic in what you do,” says Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota. Language is part of the calculus, in that it can spur action from officials and the public alike.\n\nBut, technically speaking, labeling something a pandemic has no immediate policy implications. Even the [WHO does not formally declare pandemics](https:\/\/time.com\/5827383\/maria-van-kerkhove-world-health-organization\/ \"undefined\"). The agency’s highest official level of alert is a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC), a designation meant to mobilize a global, coordinated response. (The PHEIC related to COVID-19 started in January 2020 and ended in May 2023, the same month the [U.S. government stopped calling the virus a public-health emergency](https:\/\/time.com\/6251520\/covid-19-public-health-emergency-ends-what-changes\/ \"undefined\").)\n\nAdvertisement\n\nBut, Van Kerkhove says, PHEIC is \"not a good acronym. It doesn’t evoke the kind of action like the word 'pandemic' does.”\n\nRepresentatives from WHO member countries around the world are working on a formal definition of a pandemic—four years after COVID-19 came onto the scene—as part of a wider effort to strengthen global pandemic preparedness. An alleged recent draft, which was [published in February](https:\/\/healthpolicy-watch.news\/exclusive-read-latest-pandemic-agreement-draft-ahead-of-mondays-negotiations\/ \"undefined\") by Health Policy Watch, is a mouthful: “the global spread of a pathogen or variant that infects human populations with limited or no immunity through sustained and high transmissibility from person to person, overwhelming health systems with severe morbidity and high mortality and causing social and economic disruptions, all of which requires effective national and global collaboration and coordination for its control.” (A WHO spokesperson declined to confirm the legitimacy of that draft definition, but said a new draft of the group's work is set to be published this week.)\n\nAdvertisement\n\nThat reported definition doesn’t include numbers, but it does lay out more precise ground rules for what constitutes a pandemic. The pathogen in question must be contagious, novel—since humans don’t have significant preexisting immunity to it—and virulent enough to cause lots of death and disease, overwhelming health systems and disrupting society in the process.\n\n## Is COVID-19 still a pandemic, or is it endemic?\nUnder those terms, SARS-CoV-2 still has some pandemic-y features. It’s still highly transmissible and circulating widely in countries around the world, and it remains a major cause of [death](https:\/\/www.thinkglobalhealth.org\/article\/just-how-do-deaths-due-covid-19-stack \"undefined\") and disability globally.\n\nBut it isn’t novel anymore, says Katherine Xue, a postdoctoral fellow at Stanford University who has studied viral evolution. The majority of the world’s [population now has some immunity](https:\/\/time.com\/6284236\/covid-19-immunity-antibodies\/ \"undefined\") to the virus through vaccination, prior infection, or both, which means that “even a new viral variant is probably not going to be able to infect everybody” in the way the original strain could in 2020, she says.\n\nAdvertisement\n\nCOVID-19’s spread isn’t perfectly predictable—new variants are emerging all the time, causing spikes in infections all year round [rather than seasonally](https:\/\/time.com\/6852850\/is-covid-19-seasonal-virus\/ \"undefined\")—but it is consistently circulating around the world. To Xue, that means it’s fair to call it endemic. “The picture of COVID that we have now is probably going to be very similar to what we have four years from now, \\[whereas\\] the way we dealt with COVID was very different four years ago,” she says. “The rate of change is different.”\n\nCOVID-19 also does not overwhelm health systems in the way it once did. Today, with masks, tests, vaccines, and treatments available to some extent around the world, fewer people develop severe disease, and it’s easier to care for those who do. The virus continues to kill people and cause Long COVID, but global death rates are [way down from their peaks](https:\/\/data.who.int\/dashboards\/covid19\/deaths \"undefined\").\n\nDr. Robert Wachter, chair of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, has stopped using the word “pandemic,” which he says was a “shorthand way to convey to the public” that COVID-19 constituted a worldwide emergency that required a global shift in behavior. But calling it a pandemic now “just doesn’t feel right,” he says. In his opinion, we’ve been out of the pandemic phase for about a year, given the widespread availability of tests, treatments, and vaccines.\n\nAdvertisement\n\nSo what’s the word to use now? Experts interviewed for this story were hesitant to pick one. “We really don’t have the language for things that are somewhere between flus and cold viruses and pandemics,\" Quick says.\n\n## Does the label matter?\nIt may seem purely semantic, but ambiguity over the p-word has political and public-health implications. While many countries use other labels, like emergency declarations, to unlock funding and trigger coordinated governmental responses to a crisis, calling something a pandemic—even informally—has gravitas. And saying one has ended implies, rightfully or not, that the threat is gone, which may have trickle-down effects on research funding, disease-prevention efforts, and policies around sick leave and public services.\n\nThat may be why public-health experts are so loath to take a firm stance. “I would be worried if the headline of your story is, ‘WHO Says We’re No Longer In a Pandemic,’” Van Kerkhove told me. “That would have a different level of meaning from a political point of view.”\n\nAdvertisement\n\nSaying a pandemic is over also sends a message to the public that they can move on—assuming, of course, that they haven’t already. Only about 20% of U.S. adults got the latest vaccine, and a similarly small percentage said they were worried about COVID-19 going into this past holiday season, [according to KFF data from late 2023](https:\/\/www.kff.org\/coronavirus-covid-19\/poll-finding\/vaccine-monitor-november-2023-with-covid-concerns-lagging-most-people-have-not-gotten-latest-vaccine\/ \"undefined\"). Lots of people stopped paying attention long before COVID-19’s four-year anniversary, and “the pandemic is over for them” regardless of how much experts debate the right vocabulary to use, Osterholm says.\n\nContrast that with the [daily lives of people who remain especially vulnerable](https:\/\/time.com\/6852852\/long-covid-pandemic-anniversary\/ \"undefined\") to the disease— including those who are elderly, immunocompromised, or coping with Long COVID—and it can feel like we’re living in separate timelines, Osterholm says. “Is the pandemic over for some people earlier than it is for others?” Osterholm says. “That doesn’t seem to make sense. That’s kind of like saying that there’s two different temperatures in Minneapolis in one night.”\n\nAdvertisement\n\nStill, even Osterholm wouldn’t say which view is the right one, or when a pandemic is definitively over. “I couldn’t answer it for you,” he says.\n\nReconciling those different realities is unlikely at this point. And to Quick, that’s okay. “The key messaging is not about terminology, but about what behaviors are appropriate,” he says.\n\nFor people who still observe the pandemic, those behaviors won’t be at all surprising. Experts recommend getting vaccinated, [staying home when you’re actively sick](https:\/\/time.com\/6695102\/covid-19-isolation-guidelines-experts\/ \"undefined\"), getting tested and [treated if necessary](https:\/\/time.com\/6553027\/paxlovid-for-young-healthy-adults\/ \"undefined\"), and considering additional precautions like wearing a mask and improving ventilation. But with emergency declarations expired, mandates gone, and public guidance relaxing, whether you choose to do those things is now largely up to you. “We’re in a different place with COVID,” CDC director Cohen says.\n\nIs that place a pandemic? It seems that’s also up to you.\n\n## Must-Reads from TIME\n- [American Men Are Set to Be Automatically Registered for the Draft. Here’s What to Know](https:\/\/time.com\/article\/2026\/04\/09\/us-men-automatic-military-draft-change\/?utm_rs=IL_GNBazf4RR9GSs3N-N37Btw)\n- [Catholic Vance Breaks Silence on Trump's Jesus-Like Image Amid Outcry From Other Conservatives](https:\/\/time.com\/article\/2026\/04\/14\/catholic-vance-breaks-silence-on-deleted-trump-jesus-image-amid-outcry\/?utm_rs=IL_GNBazf4RR9GSs3N-N37Btw)\n- [How NASA Achieved the Historic Artemis II Splashdown](https:\/\/time.com\/article\/2026\/04\/10\/artemis-ii-historic-splashdown\/?utm_rs=IL_GNBazf4RR9GSs3N-N37Btw)\n- [Starmer Says He's 'Fed Up' With Trump as Europe Splinters From U.S. Over Iran War](https:\/\/time.com\/article\/2026\/04\/10\/european-leaders-criticize-trump-over-iran-war-starmer-energy-prices\/?utm_rs=IL_GNBazf4RR9GSs3N-N37Btw)\n- [White House: Strait of Hormuz Closure 'Completely Unacceptable' Under Ceasefire](https:\/\/time.com\/article\/2026\/04\/08\/white-house-strait-of-hormuz-closure-would-be-completely-unacceptable-under-ceasefire\/?utm_rs=IL_GNBazf4RR9GSs3N-N37Btw)\n- [U.S. and Iran Fail To Reach Deal on Ending War After Marathon Talks](https:\/\/time.com\/article\/2026\/04\/11\/strait-of-hormuz-iran-peace-talks\/?utm_rs=IL_GNBazf4RR9GSs3N-N37Btw)\n\n- [American Men Are Set to Be Automatically Registered for the Draft. Here’s What to Know](https:\/\/time.com\/article\/2026\/04\/09\/us-men-automatic-military-draft-change\/?utm_rs=IL_GNBazf4RR9GSs3N-N37Btw)\n- [Catholic Vance Breaks Silence on Trump's Jesus-Like Image Amid Outcry From Other Conservatives](https:\/\/time.com\/article\/2026\/04\/14\/catholic-vance-breaks-silence-on-deleted-trump-jesus-image-amid-outcry\/?utm_rs=IL_GNBazf4RR9GSs3N-N37Btw)\n- [How NASA Achieved the Historic Artemis II Splashdown](https:\/\/time.com\/article\/2026\/04\/10\/artemis-ii-historic-splashdown\/?utm_rs=IL_GNBazf4RR9GSs3N-N37Btw)\n\nRead More\n\n## Sections\n- [Home](https:\/\/time.com\/)\n- [Politics](https:\/\/time.com\/section\/politics\/)\n- [Health](https:\/\/time.com\/section\/health\/)\n- [AI](https:\/\/time.com\/tag\/ai\/)\n- [World](https:\/\/time.com\/section\/world\/)\n- [Business](https:\/\/time.com\/section\/business\/)\n- [Science](https:\/\/time.com\/section\/science\/)\n\n- [Climate](https:\/\/time.com\/section\/climate\/)\n- [Ideas](https:\/\/time.com\/section\/ideas\/)\n- [Entertainment](https:\/\/time.com\/section\/entertainment\/)\n- [Sports](https:\/\/time.com\/section\/sports\/)\n- [Technology](https:\/\/time.com\/tag\/technology\/)\n- [Newsletters](https:\/\/time.com\/newsletters\/?source=TD_Footer_Link&utm_source_pg=web&utm_medium_pg=footer&utm_campaign_pg=footer&utm_content_pg=footer-inside-time)\n\n## More\n- [The TIME Vault](https:\/\/time.com\/vault\/)\n- [TIME Africa](https:\/\/africa.time.com\/)\n- [TIME France](https:\/\/www.timefrance.fr\/)\n- [TIME For Kids](https:\/\/www.timeforkids.com\/)\n- [TIME Futures](https:\/\/time.com\/collection\/time-co2-futures\/)\n\n- [TIME Studios](https:\/\/studios.time.com\/)\n- [Video](https:\/\/time.com\/collections\/time-video\/)\n- [Red Border](https:\/\/redborder.time.com\/)\n- [Supplied Partner Content](https:\/\/partnercontent.time.com\/)\n\n## About Us\n- [Our Mission](https:\/\/time.com\/about-time\/)\n- [Contact the Editors](mailto:feedback@time.com)\n- [Press Room](https:\/\/time.com\/section\/press-room\/)\n- [Media Kit](https:\/\/time.com\/mediakit\/)\n- [Reprints & Permissions](https:\/\/www.parsintl.com\/publication\/time)\n\n- [Masthead](https:\/\/time.com\/time-masthead\/)\n- [Careers](https:\/\/time.com\/join-time\/)\n- [Site Map](https:\/\/time.com\/sitemap.xml)\n- [Modern Slavery Statement](https:\/\/time.com\/modern-slavery-statement\/)\n\n## Your Subscriptions\n- [Subscribe](https:\/\/time.com\/subscribe-footer-time\/)\n- [Access My Digital Magazine](https:\/\/geo.ema.gs\/time_digital)\n- [Manage My Subscription](https:\/\/support.time.com\/)\n- [Global Help Center](https:\/\/support.time.com\/)\n\n- [Buy an Issue](https:\/\/magazineshop.us\/collections\/time-magazine\/)\n- [Shop the Cover Store](https:\/\/timecoverstore.com\/)\n- [Give a Gift](https:\/\/time.com\/giveagift\/)\n\n© 2026 TIME USA, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our [Terms of Service](https:\/\/legal.time.com\/terms-of-service), [Privacy Policy (Your Privacy Rights)](https:\/\/legal.time.com\/us-privacy-policy) and Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information.\n\nTIME may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.\n\nEdit\n\n![](https:\/\/px.outcomes.net\/pixel.gif?v=2&t=1776250099324&r=6499705953425265&pu=https%3A%2F%2Ftime.com%2F6898943%2Fis-covid-19-still-pandemic-2024%2F&po=https%3A%2F%2Ftime.com&if=false&bt=false&dt=bms_0_1-p39_0_1-mbn_1_1&tn=time_sfWhum7NTD4Kx7pJ&tt=page&is=mobian&et=im)","attrs_readable_markdown":"As a health journalist, I've written the phrase “the COVID-19 pandemic” more times than I care to count in the four years since the World Health Organization (WHO) [first used that term on March 11, 2020](https:\/\/time.com\/5791661\/who-coronavirus-pandemic-declaration\/ \"undefined\"). But lately, the word “pandemic” has given me pause.\n\nMaybe you’ve noticed it too: these days, a lot of people refer to the pandemic in the past tense. “During COVID,” they say, or, “when we were in the pandemic.” The implication is that the virus is gone and the pandemic is over.\n\nThe former is clearly untrue. The SARS-CoV-2 virus still [kills thousands of people around the world](https:\/\/data.who.int\/dashboards\/covid19\/deaths?n=c \"undefined\") each month, saddles still more with chronic symptoms [known as Long COVID](https:\/\/time.com\/6835566\/what-are-long-covid-symptoms\/ \"undefined\"), and continues to evolve, with the highly transmissible [JN.1 variant](https:\/\/time.com\/6548748\/jn1-covid-variant\/ \"undefined\") recently causing waves of infection across the globe.\n\nBut are we still a pandemic? No one seems to know for sure.\n\nWhen I asked Dr. Mandy Cohen, director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), she didn’t give a direct answer. “Rather than getting caught up in the semantics of it,” she says, people should feel confident that “we are outside of the emergency \\[phase\\]. But I don’t want folks to forget that COVID is still here and still poses a risk.”\n\nEven Maria Van Kerkhove, director of epidemic and pandemic prevention and preparedness at the WHO, admitted that the issue is a “confusing” one. The WHO continues to [describe COVID-19 as a pandemic on its website](https:\/\/www.who.int\/europe\/emergencies\/situations\/covid-19 \"undefined\"). Van Kerkhove says that’s reasonable given the virus’ continued global presence, even though we are no longer in the crisis state we were in 2020—but, she says, there’s no definitive, yes-or-no conclusion about whether that’s the right term to use.\n\n“There is no universal, agreed definition of what a pandemic is,” Van Kerkhove says. “If you asked 100 epidemiologists to define what a pandemic is, or, ‘Are we currently in a pandemic?’, you’d get a lot of different answers.”\n\nWhat’s a pandemic, anyway?\n\nEpidemiologists consider a disease “endemic” when it spreads in a consistent way, as the flu does each winter in the Northern Hemisphere. An endemic level of disease is the baseline amount for a particular area, which might not be zero but is at least predictable. If a disease suddenly causes a higher-than-average number of cases in a set area, the situation becomes an “epidemic.”\n\nThe definition for a “pandemic”—when an epidemic crosses borders, infecting lots of people across multiple countries or continents—is perhaps the squishiest of all.\n\nCalling something a pandemic is essentially a “judgment call,” because “there isn’t a precise number” of cases, hospitalizations, deaths, or affected countries that definitively denotes one, says Dr. Jonathan Quick, an adjunct professor at the Duke Global Health Institute and author of *The End of Epidemics*. “Anybody who gives you a precise number is just pulling it out of their head.”\n\nUsing that label is, in some ways, as much a political and public-relations decision as it is an epidemiological one. “If you’re trying to really reduce the number of deaths, you’ve got to be very strategic in what you do,” says Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota. Language is part of the calculus, in that it can spur action from officials and the public alike.\n\nBut, technically speaking, labeling something a pandemic has no immediate policy implications. Even the [WHO does not formally declare pandemics](https:\/\/time.com\/5827383\/maria-van-kerkhove-world-health-organization\/ \"undefined\"). The agency’s highest official level of alert is a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC), a designation meant to mobilize a global, coordinated response. (The PHEIC related to COVID-19 started in January 2020 and ended in May 2023, the same month the [U.S. government stopped calling the virus a public-health emergency](https:\/\/time.com\/6251520\/covid-19-public-health-emergency-ends-what-changes\/ \"undefined\").)\n\nBut, Van Kerkhove says, PHEIC is \"not a good acronym. It doesn’t evoke the kind of action like the word 'pandemic' does.”\n\nRepresentatives from WHO member countries around the world are working on a formal definition of a pandemic—four years after COVID-19 came onto the scene—as part of a wider effort to strengthen global pandemic preparedness. An alleged recent draft, which was [published in February](https:\/\/healthpolicy-watch.news\/exclusive-read-latest-pandemic-agreement-draft-ahead-of-mondays-negotiations\/ \"undefined\") by Health Policy Watch, is a mouthful: “the global spread of a pathogen or variant that infects human populations with limited or no immunity through sustained and high transmissibility from person to person, overwhelming health systems with severe morbidity and high mortality and causing social and economic disruptions, all of which requires effective national and global collaboration and coordination for its control.” (A WHO spokesperson declined to confirm the legitimacy of that draft definition, but said a new draft of the group's work is set to be published this week.)\n\nThat reported definition doesn’t include numbers, but it does lay out more precise ground rules for what constitutes a pandemic. The pathogen in question must be contagious, novel—since humans don’t have significant preexisting immunity to it—and virulent enough to cause lots of death and disease, overwhelming health systems and disrupting society in the process.\n\nIs COVID-19 still a pandemic, or is it endemic?\n\nUnder those terms, SARS-CoV-2 still has some pandemic-y features. It’s still highly transmissible and circulating widely in countries around the world, and it remains a major cause of [death](https:\/\/www.thinkglobalhealth.org\/article\/just-how-do-deaths-due-covid-19-stack \"undefined\") and disability globally.\n\nBut it isn’t novel anymore, says Katherine Xue, a postdoctoral fellow at Stanford University who has studied viral evolution. The majority of the world’s [population now has some immunity](https:\/\/time.com\/6284236\/covid-19-immunity-antibodies\/ \"undefined\") to the virus through vaccination, prior infection, or both, which means that “even a new viral variant is probably not going to be able to infect everybody” in the way the original strain could in 2020, she says.\n\nCOVID-19’s spread isn’t perfectly predictable—new variants are emerging all the time, causing spikes in infections all year round [rather than seasonally](https:\/\/time.com\/6852850\/is-covid-19-seasonal-virus\/ \"undefined\")—but it is consistently circulating around the world. To Xue, that means it’s fair to call it endemic. “The picture of COVID that we have now is probably going to be very similar to what we have four years from now, \\[whereas\\] the way we dealt with COVID was very different four years ago,” she says. “The rate of change is different.”\n\nCOVID-19 also does not overwhelm health systems in the way it once did. Today, with masks, tests, vaccines, and treatments available to some extent around the world, fewer people develop severe disease, and it’s easier to care for those who do. The virus continues to kill people and cause Long COVID, but global death rates are [way down from their peaks](https:\/\/data.who.int\/dashboards\/covid19\/deaths \"undefined\").\n\nDr. Robert Wachter, chair of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, has stopped using the word “pandemic,” which he says was a “shorthand way to convey to the public” that COVID-19 constituted a worldwide emergency that required a global shift in behavior. But calling it a pandemic now “just doesn’t feel right,” he says. In his opinion, we’ve been out of the pandemic phase for about a year, given the widespread availability of tests, treatments, and vaccines.\n\nSo what’s the word to use now? Experts interviewed for this story were hesitant to pick one. “We really don’t have the language for things that are somewhere between flus and cold viruses and pandemics,\" Quick says.\n\nDoes the label matter?\n\nIt may seem purely semantic, but ambiguity over the p-word has political and public-health implications. While many countries use other labels, like emergency declarations, to unlock funding and trigger coordinated governmental responses to a crisis, calling something a pandemic—even informally—has gravitas. And saying one has ended implies, rightfully or not, that the threat is gone, which may have trickle-down effects on research funding, disease-prevention efforts, and policies around sick leave and public services.\n\nThat may be why public-health experts are so loath to take a firm stance. “I would be worried if the headline of your story is, ‘WHO Says We’re No Longer In a Pandemic,’” Van Kerkhove told me. “That would have a different level of meaning from a political point of view.”\n\nSaying a pandemic is over also sends a message to the public that they can move on—assuming, of course, that they haven’t already. Only about 20% of U.S. adults got the latest vaccine, and a similarly small percentage said they were worried about COVID-19 going into this past holiday season, [according to KFF data from late 2023](https:\/\/www.kff.org\/coronavirus-covid-19\/poll-finding\/vaccine-monitor-november-2023-with-covid-concerns-lagging-most-people-have-not-gotten-latest-vaccine\/ \"undefined\"). Lots of people stopped paying attention long before COVID-19’s four-year anniversary, and “the pandemic is over for them” regardless of how much experts debate the right vocabulary to use, Osterholm says.\n\nContrast that with the [daily lives of people who remain especially vulnerable](https:\/\/time.com\/6852852\/long-covid-pandemic-anniversary\/ \"undefined\") to the disease— including those who are elderly, immunocompromised, or coping with Long COVID—and it can feel like we’re living in separate timelines, Osterholm says. “Is the pandemic over for some people earlier than it is for others?” Osterholm says. “That doesn’t seem to make sense. That’s kind of like saying that there’s two different temperatures in Minneapolis in one night.”\n\nStill, even Osterholm wouldn’t say which view is the right one, or when a pandemic is definitively over. “I couldn’t answer it for you,” he says.\n\nReconciling those different realities is unlikely at this point. And to Quick, that’s okay. “The key messaging is not about terminology, but about what behaviors are appropriate,” he says.\n\nFor people who still observe the pandemic, those behaviors won’t be at all surprising. Experts recommend getting vaccinated, [staying home when you’re actively sick](https:\/\/time.com\/6695102\/covid-19-isolation-guidelines-experts\/ \"undefined\"), getting tested and [treated if necessary](https:\/\/time.com\/6553027\/paxlovid-for-young-healthy-adults\/ \"undefined\"), and considering additional precautions like wearing a mask and improving ventilation. But with emergency declarations expired, mandates gone, and public guidance relaxing, whether you choose to do those things is now largely up to you. “We’re in a different place with COVID,” CDC director Cohen says.\n\nIs that place a pandemic? It seems that’s also up to you.","meta_canonical":null,"ml_categories_json":"{\"\/Health\":881,\"\/Health\/Public_Health\":864,\"\/Health\/Public_Health\/Health_Policy\":849,\"\/News\":205,\"\/News\/Health_News\":203}","ml_types_json":"{\"\/Article\":997,\"\/Article\/Opinion_Piece\":675}","ml_intent_types_json":"{\"Informational\":999}","meta_language":"en","attrs_author":"Jamie Ducharme","attrs_publish_time":1710166850,"attrs_original_publish_time":1710166850,"attrs_is_republished":0,"attrs_nr_words":"2003","attrs_boilerpipe_nr_words":"1644","body_ext_links_number":25,"body_int_links_number":64,"meta_nofollow":0,"meta_noarchive":0,"props_was_rendered":1,"src_redirect":"","download_time_msec":32,"download_ttfb_msec":30,"download_size":73909}

3. Robots.txt Check

Query:

Response:

4. Spam/Ban Check

Query:

Response:

5. Seen Status Check

ℹ️ Skipped - page is already crawled

📄

INDEXABLE

✅

CRAWLED

8 days ago

🤖

ROBOTS ALLOWED

Page Info Filters

Filter	Status	Condition	Details
HTTP status	PASS	`download_http_code = 200`	HTTP 200
Age cutoff	PASS	`download_stamp > now() - 6 MONTH`	0.3 months ago
History drop	PASS	`isNull(history_drop_reason)`	No drop reason
Spam/ban	PASS	`fh_dont_index != 1 AND ml_spam_score = 0`	ml_spam_score=0
Canonical	PASS	`meta_canonical IS NULL OR = '' OR = src_unparsed`	Not set

Page Details

Property

Value

URL

https://time.com/6898943/is-covid-19-still-pandemic-2024/

Last Crawled

2026-04-15 10:48:18 (8 days ago)

First Indexed

2024-03-11 14:32:58 (2 years ago)

HTTP Status Code

200

Content

Meta Title

Is COVID-19 Still a Pandemic?

Meta Description

The WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic on March 11, 2020. Four years later, in 2024, is COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 still a pandemic?

Meta Canonical

null

Boilerpipe Text

As a health journalist, I've written the phrase “the COVID-19 pandemic” more times than I care to count in the four years since the World Health Organization (WHO) first used that term on March 11, 2020 . But lately, the word “pandemic” has given me pause. Maybe you’ve noticed it too: these days, a lot of people refer to the pandemic in the past tense. “During COVID,” they say, or, “when we were in the pandemic.” The implication is that the virus is gone and the pandemic is over. The former is clearly untrue. The SARS-CoV-2 virus still kills thousands of people around the world each month, saddles still more with chronic symptoms known as Long COVID , and continues to evolve, with the highly transmissible JN.1 variant recently causing waves of infection across the globe. But are we still a pandemic? No one seems to know for sure. When I asked Dr. Mandy Cohen, director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), she didn’t give a direct answer. “Rather than getting caught up in the semantics of it,” she says, people should feel confident that “we are outside of the emergency [phase]. But I don’t want folks to forget that COVID is still here and still poses a risk.” Even Maria Van Kerkhove, director of epidemic and pandemic prevention and preparedness at the WHO, admitted that the issue is a “confusing” one. The WHO continues to describe COVID-19 as a pandemic on its website . Van Kerkhove says that’s reasonable given the virus’ continued global presence, even though we are no longer in the crisis state we were in 2020—but, she says, there’s no definitive, yes-or-no conclusion about whether that’s the right term to use. “There is no universal, agreed definition of what a pandemic is,” Van Kerkhove says. “If you asked 100 epidemiologists to define what a pandemic is, or, ‘Are we currently in a pandemic?’, you’d get a lot of different answers.” What’s a pandemic, anyway? Epidemiologists consider a disease “endemic” when it spreads in a consistent way, as the flu does each winter in the Northern Hemisphere. An endemic level of disease is the baseline amount for a particular area, which might not be zero but is at least predictable. If a disease suddenly causes a higher-than-average number of cases in a set area, the situation becomes an “epidemic.” The definition for a “pandemic”—when an epidemic crosses borders, infecting lots of people across multiple countries or continents—is perhaps the squishiest of all. Calling something a pandemic is essentially a “judgment call,” because “there isn’t a precise number” of cases, hospitalizations, deaths, or affected countries that definitively denotes one, says Dr. Jonathan Quick, an adjunct professor at the Duke Global Health Institute and author of The End of Epidemics . “Anybody who gives you a precise number is just pulling it out of their head.” Using that label is, in some ways, as much a political and public-relations decision as it is an epidemiological one. “If you’re trying to really reduce the number of deaths, you’ve got to be very strategic in what you do,” says Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota. Language is part of the calculus, in that it can spur action from officials and the public alike. But, technically speaking, labeling something a pandemic has no immediate policy implications. Even the WHO does not formally declare pandemics . The agency’s highest official level of alert is a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC), a designation meant to mobilize a global, coordinated response. (The PHEIC related to COVID-19 started in January 2020 and ended in May 2023, the same month the U.S. government stopped calling the virus a public-health emergency .) But, Van Kerkhove says, PHEIC is "not a good acronym. It doesn’t evoke the kind of action like the word 'pandemic' does.” Representatives from WHO member countries around the world are working on a formal definition of a pandemic—four years after COVID-19 came onto the scene—as part of a wider effort to strengthen global pandemic preparedness. An alleged recent draft, which was published in February by Health Policy Watch, is a mouthful: “the global spread of a pathogen or variant that infects human populations with limited or no immunity through sustained and high transmissibility from person to person, overwhelming health systems with severe morbidity and high mortality and causing social and economic disruptions, all of which requires effective national and global collaboration and coordination for its control.” (A WHO spokesperson declined to confirm the legitimacy of that draft definition, but said a new draft of the group's work is set to be published this week.) That reported definition doesn’t include numbers, but it does lay out more precise ground rules for what constitutes a pandemic. The pathogen in question must be contagious, novel—since humans don’t have significant preexisting immunity to it—and virulent enough to cause lots of death and disease, overwhelming health systems and disrupting society in the process. Is COVID-19 still a pandemic, or is it endemic? Under those terms, SARS-CoV-2 still has some pandemic-y features. It’s still highly transmissible and circulating widely in countries around the world, and it remains a major cause of death and disability globally. But it isn’t novel anymore, says Katherine Xue, a postdoctoral fellow at Stanford University who has studied viral evolution. The majority of the world’s population now has some immunity to the virus through vaccination, prior infection, or both, which means that “even a new viral variant is probably not going to be able to infect everybody” in the way the original strain could in 2020, she says. COVID-19’s spread isn’t perfectly predictable—new variants are emerging all the time, causing spikes in infections all year round rather than seasonally —but it is consistently circulating around the world. To Xue, that means it’s fair to call it endemic. “The picture of COVID that we have now is probably going to be very similar to what we have four years from now, [whereas] the way we dealt with COVID was very different four years ago,” she says. “The rate of change is different.” COVID-19 also does not overwhelm health systems in the way it once did. Today, with masks, tests, vaccines, and treatments available to some extent around the world, fewer people develop severe disease, and it’s easier to care for those who do. The virus continues to kill people and cause Long COVID, but global death rates are way down from their peaks . Dr. Robert Wachter, chair of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, has stopped using the word “pandemic,” which he says was a “shorthand way to convey to the public” that COVID-19 constituted a worldwide emergency that required a global shift in behavior. But calling it a pandemic now “just doesn’t feel right,” he says. In his opinion, we’ve been out of the pandemic phase for about a year, given the widespread availability of tests, treatments, and vaccines. So what’s the word to use now? Experts interviewed for this story were hesitant to pick one. “We really don’t have the language for things that are somewhere between flus and cold viruses and pandemics," Quick says. Does the label matter? It may seem purely semantic, but ambiguity over the p-word has political and public-health implications. While many countries use other labels, like emergency declarations, to unlock funding and trigger coordinated governmental responses to a crisis, calling something a pandemic—even informally—has gravitas. And saying one has ended implies, rightfully or not, that the threat is gone, which may have trickle-down effects on research funding, disease-prevention efforts, and policies around sick leave and public services. That may be why public-health experts are so loath to take a firm stance. “I would be worried if the headline of your story is, ‘WHO Says We’re No Longer In a Pandemic,’” Van Kerkhove told me. “That would have a different level of meaning from a political point of view.” Saying a pandemic is over also sends a message to the public that they can move on—assuming, of course, that they haven’t already. Only about 20% of U.S. adults got the latest vaccine, and a similarly small percentage said they were worried about COVID-19 going into this past holiday season, according to KFF data from late 2023 . Lots of people stopped paying attention long before COVID-19’s four-year anniversary, and “the pandemic is over for them” regardless of how much experts debate the right vocabulary to use, Osterholm says. Contrast that with the daily lives of people who remain especially vulnerable to the disease— including those who are elderly, immunocompromised, or coping with Long COVID—and it can feel like we’re living in separate timelines, Osterholm says. “Is the pandemic over for some people earlier than it is for others?” Osterholm says. “That doesn’t seem to make sense. That’s kind of like saying that there’s two different temperatures in Minneapolis in one night.” Still, even Osterholm wouldn’t say which view is the right one, or when a pandemic is definitively over. “I couldn’t answer it for you,” he says. Reconciling those different realities is unlikely at this point. And to Quick, that’s okay. “The key messaging is not about terminology, but about what behaviors are appropriate,” he says. For people who still observe the pandemic, those behaviors won’t be at all surprising. Experts recommend getting vaccinated, staying home when you’re actively sick , getting tested and treated if necessary , and considering additional precautions like wearing a mask and improving ventilation. But with emergency declarations expired, mandates gone, and public guidance relaxing, whether you choose to do those things is now largely up to you. “We’re in a different place with COVID,” CDC director Cohen says. Is that place a pandemic? It seems that’s also up to you.

Markdown

[Skip to Content](https://time.com/6898943/is-covid-19-still-pandemic-2024/#maincontent) - Menu Close [Subscribe](https://time.com/subscribe-header-time/) - [Health](https://time.com/section/health/) - [COVID-19](https://time.com/tag/covid-19/) # Experts Can't Agree If We're Still in a Pandemic [ADD TIME ON GOOGLE](https://www.google.com/preferences/source?q=https://time.com) Show me more content from TIME on Google Search ![Jamie Ducharme](https://gcp-na-images.contentstack.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltee90d03f171c21c6/698a0b45db2987baea2650e7/200115_Time_Headshots_Day451258.jpg?branch=production&width=3840&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1%3A1) by [Jamie Ducharme](https://time.com/author/jamie-ducharme/) Ducharme is a contributor to TIME. Updated: Jan 19, 2026 1:32 PM CUT Published: Mar 11, 2024 2:20 PM CUT ![Abstract image of end to corona virus emergency](https://gcp-na-images.contentstack.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt912cc269255fdc5e/698a493e457a5278b4d68e49/covid-19-pandemic.jpg?branch=production&width=3840&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=3%3A2) Abstract image of end to corona virus emergency Abstract image of end to corona virus emergencyGetty Images ![Jamie Ducharme](https://gcp-na-images.contentstack.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltee90d03f171c21c6/698a0b45db2987baea2650e7/200115_Time_Headshots_Day451258.jpg?branch=production&width=3840&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1%3A1) by [Jamie Ducharme](https://time.com/author/jamie-ducharme/) Ducharme is a contributor to TIME. Updated: Jan 19, 2026 1:32 PM CUT Published: Mar 11, 2024 2:20 PM CUT As a health journalist, I've written the phrase “the COVID-19 pandemic” more times than I care to count in the four years since the World Health Organization (WHO) [first used that term on March 11, 2020](https://time.com/5791661/who-coronavirus-pandemic-declaration/ "undefined"). But lately, the word “pandemic” has given me pause. Maybe you’ve noticed it too: these days, a lot of people refer to the pandemic in the past tense. “During COVID,” they say, or, “when we were in the pandemic.” The implication is that the virus is gone and the pandemic is over. The former is clearly untrue. The SARS-CoV-2 virus still [kills thousands of people around the world](https://data.who.int/dashboards/covid19/deaths?n=c "undefined") each month, saddles still more with chronic symptoms [known as Long COVID](https://time.com/6835566/what-are-long-covid-symptoms/ "undefined"), and continues to evolve, with the highly transmissible [JN.1 variant](https://time.com/6548748/jn1-covid-variant/ "undefined") recently causing waves of infection across the globe. But are we still a pandemic? No one seems to know for sure. When I asked Dr. Mandy Cohen, director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), she didn’t give a direct answer. “Rather than getting caught up in the semantics of it,” she says, people should feel confident that “we are outside of the emergency \[phase\]. But I don’t want folks to forget that COVID is still here and still poses a risk.” Even Maria Van Kerkhove, director of epidemic and pandemic prevention and preparedness at the WHO, admitted that the issue is a “confusing” one. The WHO continues to [describe COVID-19 as a pandemic on its website](https://www.who.int/europe/emergencies/situations/covid-19 "undefined"). Van Kerkhove says that’s reasonable given the virus’ continued global presence, even though we are no longer in the crisis state we were in 2020—but, she says, there’s no definitive, yes-or-no conclusion about whether that’s the right term to use. Advertisement “There is no universal, agreed definition of what a pandemic is,” Van Kerkhove says. “If you asked 100 epidemiologists to define what a pandemic is, or, ‘Are we currently in a pandemic?’, you’d get a lot of different answers.” ## What’s a pandemic, anyway? Epidemiologists consider a disease “endemic” when it spreads in a consistent way, as the flu does each winter in the Northern Hemisphere. An endemic level of disease is the baseline amount for a particular area, which might not be zero but is at least predictable. If a disease suddenly causes a higher-than-average number of cases in a set area, the situation becomes an “epidemic.” The definition for a “pandemic”—when an epidemic crosses borders, infecting lots of people across multiple countries or continents—is perhaps the squishiest of all. Calling something a pandemic is essentially a “judgment call,” because “there isn’t a precise number” of cases, hospitalizations, deaths, or affected countries that definitively denotes one, says Dr. Jonathan Quick, an adjunct professor at the Duke Global Health Institute and author of *The End of Epidemics*. “Anybody who gives you a precise number is just pulling it out of their head.” Advertisement Using that label is, in some ways, as much a political and public-relations decision as it is an epidemiological one. “If you’re trying to really reduce the number of deaths, you’ve got to be very strategic in what you do,” says Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota. Language is part of the calculus, in that it can spur action from officials and the public alike. But, technically speaking, labeling something a pandemic has no immediate policy implications. Even the [WHO does not formally declare pandemics](https://time.com/5827383/maria-van-kerkhove-world-health-organization/ "undefined"). The agency’s highest official level of alert is a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC), a designation meant to mobilize a global, coordinated response. (The PHEIC related to COVID-19 started in January 2020 and ended in May 2023, the same month the [U.S. government stopped calling the virus a public-health emergency](https://time.com/6251520/covid-19-public-health-emergency-ends-what-changes/ "undefined").) Advertisement But, Van Kerkhove says, PHEIC is "not a good acronym. It doesn’t evoke the kind of action like the word 'pandemic' does.” Representatives from WHO member countries around the world are working on a formal definition of a pandemic—four years after COVID-19 came onto the scene—as part of a wider effort to strengthen global pandemic preparedness. An alleged recent draft, which was [published in February](https://healthpolicy-watch.news/exclusive-read-latest-pandemic-agreement-draft-ahead-of-mondays-negotiations/ "undefined") by Health Policy Watch, is a mouthful: “the global spread of a pathogen or variant that infects human populations with limited or no immunity through sustained and high transmissibility from person to person, overwhelming health systems with severe morbidity and high mortality and causing social and economic disruptions, all of which requires effective national and global collaboration and coordination for its control.” (A WHO spokesperson declined to confirm the legitimacy of that draft definition, but said a new draft of the group's work is set to be published this week.) Advertisement That reported definition doesn’t include numbers, but it does lay out more precise ground rules for what constitutes a pandemic. The pathogen in question must be contagious, novel—since humans don’t have significant preexisting immunity to it—and virulent enough to cause lots of death and disease, overwhelming health systems and disrupting society in the process. ## Is COVID-19 still a pandemic, or is it endemic? Under those terms, SARS-CoV-2 still has some pandemic-y features. It’s still highly transmissible and circulating widely in countries around the world, and it remains a major cause of [death](https://www.thinkglobalhealth.org/article/just-how-do-deaths-due-covid-19-stack "undefined") and disability globally. But it isn’t novel anymore, says Katherine Xue, a postdoctoral fellow at Stanford University who has studied viral evolution. The majority of the world’s [population now has some immunity](https://time.com/6284236/covid-19-immunity-antibodies/ "undefined") to the virus through vaccination, prior infection, or both, which means that “even a new viral variant is probably not going to be able to infect everybody” in the way the original strain could in 2020, she says. Advertisement COVID-19’s spread isn’t perfectly predictable—new variants are emerging all the time, causing spikes in infections all year round [rather than seasonally](https://time.com/6852850/is-covid-19-seasonal-virus/ "undefined")—but it is consistently circulating around the world. To Xue, that means it’s fair to call it endemic. “The picture of COVID that we have now is probably going to be very similar to what we have four years from now, \[whereas\] the way we dealt with COVID was very different four years ago,” she says. “The rate of change is different.” COVID-19 also does not overwhelm health systems in the way it once did. Today, with masks, tests, vaccines, and treatments available to some extent around the world, fewer people develop severe disease, and it’s easier to care for those who do. The virus continues to kill people and cause Long COVID, but global death rates are [way down from their peaks](https://data.who.int/dashboards/covid19/deaths "undefined"). Dr. Robert Wachter, chair of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, has stopped using the word “pandemic,” which he says was a “shorthand way to convey to the public” that COVID-19 constituted a worldwide emergency that required a global shift in behavior. But calling it a pandemic now “just doesn’t feel right,” he says. In his opinion, we’ve been out of the pandemic phase for about a year, given the widespread availability of tests, treatments, and vaccines. Advertisement So what’s the word to use now? Experts interviewed for this story were hesitant to pick one. “We really don’t have the language for things that are somewhere between flus and cold viruses and pandemics," Quick says. ## Does the label matter? It may seem purely semantic, but ambiguity over the p-word has political and public-health implications. While many countries use other labels, like emergency declarations, to unlock funding and trigger coordinated governmental responses to a crisis, calling something a pandemic—even informally—has gravitas. And saying one has ended implies, rightfully or not, that the threat is gone, which may have trickle-down effects on research funding, disease-prevention efforts, and policies around sick leave and public services. That may be why public-health experts are so loath to take a firm stance. “I would be worried if the headline of your story is, ‘WHO Says We’re No Longer In a Pandemic,’” Van Kerkhove told me. “That would have a different level of meaning from a political point of view.” Advertisement Saying a pandemic is over also sends a message to the public that they can move on—assuming, of course, that they haven’t already. Only about 20% of U.S. adults got the latest vaccine, and a similarly small percentage said they were worried about COVID-19 going into this past holiday season, [according to KFF data from late 2023](https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covid-19/poll-finding/vaccine-monitor-november-2023-with-covid-concerns-lagging-most-people-have-not-gotten-latest-vaccine/ "undefined"). Lots of people stopped paying attention long before COVID-19’s four-year anniversary, and “the pandemic is over for them” regardless of how much experts debate the right vocabulary to use, Osterholm says. Contrast that with the [daily lives of people who remain especially vulnerable](https://time.com/6852852/long-covid-pandemic-anniversary/ "undefined") to the disease— including those who are elderly, immunocompromised, or coping with Long COVID—and it can feel like we’re living in separate timelines, Osterholm says. “Is the pandemic over for some people earlier than it is for others?” Osterholm says. “That doesn’t seem to make sense. That’s kind of like saying that there’s two different temperatures in Minneapolis in one night.” Advertisement Still, even Osterholm wouldn’t say which view is the right one, or when a pandemic is definitively over. “I couldn’t answer it for you,” he says. Reconciling those different realities is unlikely at this point. And to Quick, that’s okay. “The key messaging is not about terminology, but about what behaviors are appropriate,” he says. For people who still observe the pandemic, those behaviors won’t be at all surprising. Experts recommend getting vaccinated, [staying home when you’re actively sick](https://time.com/6695102/covid-19-isolation-guidelines-experts/ "undefined"), getting tested and [treated if necessary](https://time.com/6553027/paxlovid-for-young-healthy-adults/ "undefined"), and considering additional precautions like wearing a mask and improving ventilation. But with emergency declarations expired, mandates gone, and public guidance relaxing, whether you choose to do those things is now largely up to you. “We’re in a different place with COVID,” CDC director Cohen says. Is that place a pandemic? It seems that’s also up to you. ## Must-Reads from TIME - [American Men Are Set to Be Automatically Registered for the Draft. Here’s What to Know](https://time.com/article/2026/04/09/us-men-automatic-military-draft-change/?utm_rs=IL_GNBazf4RR9GSs3N-N37Btw) - [Catholic Vance Breaks Silence on Trump's Jesus-Like Image Amid Outcry From Other Conservatives](https://time.com/article/2026/04/14/catholic-vance-breaks-silence-on-deleted-trump-jesus-image-amid-outcry/?utm_rs=IL_GNBazf4RR9GSs3N-N37Btw) - [How NASA Achieved the Historic Artemis II Splashdown](https://time.com/article/2026/04/10/artemis-ii-historic-splashdown/?utm_rs=IL_GNBazf4RR9GSs3N-N37Btw) - [Starmer Says He's 'Fed Up' With Trump as Europe Splinters From U.S. Over Iran War](https://time.com/article/2026/04/10/european-leaders-criticize-trump-over-iran-war-starmer-energy-prices/?utm_rs=IL_GNBazf4RR9GSs3N-N37Btw) - [White House: Strait of Hormuz Closure 'Completely Unacceptable' Under Ceasefire](https://time.com/article/2026/04/08/white-house-strait-of-hormuz-closure-would-be-completely-unacceptable-under-ceasefire/?utm_rs=IL_GNBazf4RR9GSs3N-N37Btw) - [U.S. and Iran Fail To Reach Deal on Ending War After Marathon Talks](https://time.com/article/2026/04/11/strait-of-hormuz-iran-peace-talks/?utm_rs=IL_GNBazf4RR9GSs3N-N37Btw) - [American Men Are Set to Be Automatically Registered for the Draft. Here’s What to Know](https://time.com/article/2026/04/09/us-men-automatic-military-draft-change/?utm_rs=IL_GNBazf4RR9GSs3N-N37Btw) - [Catholic Vance Breaks Silence on Trump's Jesus-Like Image Amid Outcry From Other Conservatives](https://time.com/article/2026/04/14/catholic-vance-breaks-silence-on-deleted-trump-jesus-image-amid-outcry/?utm_rs=IL_GNBazf4RR9GSs3N-N37Btw) - [How NASA Achieved the Historic Artemis II Splashdown](https://time.com/article/2026/04/10/artemis-ii-historic-splashdown/?utm_rs=IL_GNBazf4RR9GSs3N-N37Btw) Read More ## Sections - [Home](https://time.com/) - [Politics](https://time.com/section/politics/) - [Health](https://time.com/section/health/) - [AI](https://time.com/tag/ai/) - [World](https://time.com/section/world/) - [Business](https://time.com/section/business/) - [Science](https://time.com/section/science/) - [Climate](https://time.com/section/climate/) - [Ideas](https://time.com/section/ideas/) - [Entertainment](https://time.com/section/entertainment/) - [Sports](https://time.com/section/sports/) - [Technology](https://time.com/tag/technology/) - [Newsletters](https://time.com/newsletters/?source=TD_Footer_Link&utm_source_pg=web&utm_medium_pg=footer&utm_campaign_pg=footer&utm_content_pg=footer-inside-time) ## More - [The TIME Vault](https://time.com/vault/) - [TIME Africa](https://africa.time.com/) - [TIME France](https://www.timefrance.fr/) - [TIME For Kids](https://www.timeforkids.com/) - [TIME Futures](https://time.com/collection/time-co2-futures/) - [TIME Studios](https://studios.time.com/) - [Video](https://time.com/collections/time-video/) - [Red Border](https://redborder.time.com/) - [Supplied Partner Content](https://partnercontent.time.com/) ## About Us - [Our Mission](https://time.com/about-time/) - [Contact the Editors](mailto:feedback@time.com) - [Press Room](https://time.com/section/press-room/) - [Media Kit](https://time.com/mediakit/) - [Reprints & Permissions](https://www.parsintl.com/publication/time) - [Masthead](https://time.com/time-masthead/) - [Careers](https://time.com/join-time/) - [Site Map](https://time.com/sitemap.xml) - [Modern Slavery Statement](https://time.com/modern-slavery-statement/) ## Your Subscriptions - [Subscribe](https://time.com/subscribe-footer-time/) - [Access My Digital Magazine](https://geo.ema.gs/time_digital) - [Manage My Subscription](https://support.time.com/) - [Global Help Center](https://support.time.com/) - [Buy an Issue](https://magazineshop.us/collections/time-magazine/) - [Shop the Cover Store](https://timecoverstore.com/) - [Give a Gift](https://time.com/giveagift/) © 2026 TIME USA, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our [Terms of Service](https://legal.time.com/terms-of-service), [Privacy Policy (Your Privacy Rights)](https://legal.time.com/us-privacy-policy) and Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information. TIME may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice. Edit ![](https://px.outcomes.net/pixel.gif?v=2&t=1776250099324&r=6499705953425265&pu=https%3A%2F%2Ftime.com%2F6898943%2Fis-covid-19-still-pandemic-2024%2F&po=https%3A%2F%2Ftime.com&if=false&bt=false&dt=bms_0_1-p39_0_1-mbn_1_1&tn=time_sfWhum7NTD4Kx7pJ&tt=page&is=mobian&et=im)

Readable Markdown

As a health journalist, I've written the phrase “the COVID-19 pandemic” more times than I care to count in the four years since the World Health Organization (WHO) [first used that term on March 11, 2020](https://time.com/5791661/who-coronavirus-pandemic-declaration/ "undefined"). But lately, the word “pandemic” has given me pause. Maybe you’ve noticed it too: these days, a lot of people refer to the pandemic in the past tense. “During COVID,” they say, or, “when we were in the pandemic.” The implication is that the virus is gone and the pandemic is over. The former is clearly untrue. The SARS-CoV-2 virus still [kills thousands of people around the world](https://data.who.int/dashboards/covid19/deaths?n=c "undefined") each month, saddles still more with chronic symptoms [known as Long COVID](https://time.com/6835566/what-are-long-covid-symptoms/ "undefined"), and continues to evolve, with the highly transmissible [JN.1 variant](https://time.com/6548748/jn1-covid-variant/ "undefined") recently causing waves of infection across the globe. But are we still a pandemic? No one seems to know for sure. When I asked Dr. Mandy Cohen, director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), she didn’t give a direct answer. “Rather than getting caught up in the semantics of it,” she says, people should feel confident that “we are outside of the emergency \[phase\]. But I don’t want folks to forget that COVID is still here and still poses a risk.” Even Maria Van Kerkhove, director of epidemic and pandemic prevention and preparedness at the WHO, admitted that the issue is a “confusing” one. The WHO continues to [describe COVID-19 as a pandemic on its website](https://www.who.int/europe/emergencies/situations/covid-19 "undefined"). Van Kerkhove says that’s reasonable given the virus’ continued global presence, even though we are no longer in the crisis state we were in 2020—but, she says, there’s no definitive, yes-or-no conclusion about whether that’s the right term to use. “There is no universal, agreed definition of what a pandemic is,” Van Kerkhove says. “If you asked 100 epidemiologists to define what a pandemic is, or, ‘Are we currently in a pandemic?’, you’d get a lot of different answers.” What’s a pandemic, anyway? Epidemiologists consider a disease “endemic” when it spreads in a consistent way, as the flu does each winter in the Northern Hemisphere. An endemic level of disease is the baseline amount for a particular area, which might not be zero but is at least predictable. If a disease suddenly causes a higher-than-average number of cases in a set area, the situation becomes an “epidemic.” The definition for a “pandemic”—when an epidemic crosses borders, infecting lots of people across multiple countries or continents—is perhaps the squishiest of all. Calling something a pandemic is essentially a “judgment call,” because “there isn’t a precise number” of cases, hospitalizations, deaths, or affected countries that definitively denotes one, says Dr. Jonathan Quick, an adjunct professor at the Duke Global Health Institute and author of *The End of Epidemics*. “Anybody who gives you a precise number is just pulling it out of their head.” Using that label is, in some ways, as much a political and public-relations decision as it is an epidemiological one. “If you’re trying to really reduce the number of deaths, you’ve got to be very strategic in what you do,” says Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota. Language is part of the calculus, in that it can spur action from officials and the public alike. But, technically speaking, labeling something a pandemic has no immediate policy implications. Even the [WHO does not formally declare pandemics](https://time.com/5827383/maria-van-kerkhove-world-health-organization/ "undefined"). The agency’s highest official level of alert is a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC), a designation meant to mobilize a global, coordinated response. (The PHEIC related to COVID-19 started in January 2020 and ended in May 2023, the same month the [U.S. government stopped calling the virus a public-health emergency](https://time.com/6251520/covid-19-public-health-emergency-ends-what-changes/ "undefined").) But, Van Kerkhove says, PHEIC is "not a good acronym. It doesn’t evoke the kind of action like the word 'pandemic' does.” Representatives from WHO member countries around the world are working on a formal definition of a pandemic—four years after COVID-19 came onto the scene—as part of a wider effort to strengthen global pandemic preparedness. An alleged recent draft, which was [published in February](https://healthpolicy-watch.news/exclusive-read-latest-pandemic-agreement-draft-ahead-of-mondays-negotiations/ "undefined") by Health Policy Watch, is a mouthful: “the global spread of a pathogen or variant that infects human populations with limited or no immunity through sustained and high transmissibility from person to person, overwhelming health systems with severe morbidity and high mortality and causing social and economic disruptions, all of which requires effective national and global collaboration and coordination for its control.” (A WHO spokesperson declined to confirm the legitimacy of that draft definition, but said a new draft of the group's work is set to be published this week.) That reported definition doesn’t include numbers, but it does lay out more precise ground rules for what constitutes a pandemic. The pathogen in question must be contagious, novel—since humans don’t have significant preexisting immunity to it—and virulent enough to cause lots of death and disease, overwhelming health systems and disrupting society in the process. Is COVID-19 still a pandemic, or is it endemic? Under those terms, SARS-CoV-2 still has some pandemic-y features. It’s still highly transmissible and circulating widely in countries around the world, and it remains a major cause of [death](https://www.thinkglobalhealth.org/article/just-how-do-deaths-due-covid-19-stack "undefined") and disability globally. But it isn’t novel anymore, says Katherine Xue, a postdoctoral fellow at Stanford University who has studied viral evolution. The majority of the world’s [population now has some immunity](https://time.com/6284236/covid-19-immunity-antibodies/ "undefined") to the virus through vaccination, prior infection, or both, which means that “even a new viral variant is probably not going to be able to infect everybody” in the way the original strain could in 2020, she says. COVID-19’s spread isn’t perfectly predictable—new variants are emerging all the time, causing spikes in infections all year round [rather than seasonally](https://time.com/6852850/is-covid-19-seasonal-virus/ "undefined")—but it is consistently circulating around the world. To Xue, that means it’s fair to call it endemic. “The picture of COVID that we have now is probably going to be very similar to what we have four years from now, \[whereas\] the way we dealt with COVID was very different four years ago,” she says. “The rate of change is different.” COVID-19 also does not overwhelm health systems in the way it once did. Today, with masks, tests, vaccines, and treatments available to some extent around the world, fewer people develop severe disease, and it’s easier to care for those who do. The virus continues to kill people and cause Long COVID, but global death rates are [way down from their peaks](https://data.who.int/dashboards/covid19/deaths "undefined"). Dr. Robert Wachter, chair of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, has stopped using the word “pandemic,” which he says was a “shorthand way to convey to the public” that COVID-19 constituted a worldwide emergency that required a global shift in behavior. But calling it a pandemic now “just doesn’t feel right,” he says. In his opinion, we’ve been out of the pandemic phase for about a year, given the widespread availability of tests, treatments, and vaccines. So what’s the word to use now? Experts interviewed for this story were hesitant to pick one. “We really don’t have the language for things that are somewhere between flus and cold viruses and pandemics," Quick says. Does the label matter? It may seem purely semantic, but ambiguity over the p-word has political and public-health implications. While many countries use other labels, like emergency declarations, to unlock funding and trigger coordinated governmental responses to a crisis, calling something a pandemic—even informally—has gravitas. And saying one has ended implies, rightfully or not, that the threat is gone, which may have trickle-down effects on research funding, disease-prevention efforts, and policies around sick leave and public services. That may be why public-health experts are so loath to take a firm stance. “I would be worried if the headline of your story is, ‘WHO Says We’re No Longer In a Pandemic,’” Van Kerkhove told me. “That would have a different level of meaning from a political point of view.” Saying a pandemic is over also sends a message to the public that they can move on—assuming, of course, that they haven’t already. Only about 20% of U.S. adults got the latest vaccine, and a similarly small percentage said they were worried about COVID-19 going into this past holiday season, [according to KFF data from late 2023](https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covid-19/poll-finding/vaccine-monitor-november-2023-with-covid-concerns-lagging-most-people-have-not-gotten-latest-vaccine/ "undefined"). Lots of people stopped paying attention long before COVID-19’s four-year anniversary, and “the pandemic is over for them” regardless of how much experts debate the right vocabulary to use, Osterholm says. Contrast that with the [daily lives of people who remain especially vulnerable](https://time.com/6852852/long-covid-pandemic-anniversary/ "undefined") to the disease— including those who are elderly, immunocompromised, or coping with Long COVID—and it can feel like we’re living in separate timelines, Osterholm says. “Is the pandemic over for some people earlier than it is for others?” Osterholm says. “That doesn’t seem to make sense. That’s kind of like saying that there’s two different temperatures in Minneapolis in one night.” Still, even Osterholm wouldn’t say which view is the right one, or when a pandemic is definitively over. “I couldn’t answer it for you,” he says. Reconciling those different realities is unlikely at this point. And to Quick, that’s okay. “The key messaging is not about terminology, but about what behaviors are appropriate,” he says. For people who still observe the pandemic, those behaviors won’t be at all surprising. Experts recommend getting vaccinated, [staying home when you’re actively sick](https://time.com/6695102/covid-19-isolation-guidelines-experts/ "undefined"), getting tested and [treated if necessary](https://time.com/6553027/paxlovid-for-young-healthy-adults/ "undefined"), and considering additional precautions like wearing a mask and improving ventilation. But with emergency declarations expired, mandates gone, and public guidance relaxing, whether you choose to do those things is now largely up to you. “We’re in a different place with COVID,” CDC director Cohen says. Is that place a pandemic? It seems that’s also up to you.

ML Classification

ML Categories

/Health		88.1%
/Health/Public_Health		86.4%
/Health/Public_Health/Health_Policy		84.9%
/News		20.5%
/News/Health_News		20.3%

Raw JSON

{
    "/Health": 881,
    "/Health/Public_Health": 864,
    "/Health/Public_Health/Health_Policy": 849,
    "/News": 205,
    "/News/Health_News": 203
}

ML Page Types

/Article		99.7%
/Article/Opinion_Piece		67.5%

Raw JSON

{
    "/Article": 997,
    "/Article/Opinion_Piece": 675
}

ML Intent Types

Informational

99.9%

Raw JSON

{
    "Informational": 999
}

Content Metadata

Language

Author

Jamie Ducharme

Publish Time

2024-03-11 14:20:50 (2 years ago)

Original Publish Time

2024-03-11 14:20:50 (2 years ago)

Republished

Word Count (Total)

2,003

Word Count (Content)

1,644

Links

External Links

Internal Links

Technical SEO

Meta Nofollow

Meta Noarchive

JS Rendered

Yes

Redirect Target

null

Performance

Download Time (ms)

TTFB (ms)

Download Size (bytes)

73,909

Shard

39 (laksa)

Root Hash

9797552172251460839

Unparsed URL

com,time!/6898943/is-covid-19-still-pandemic-2024/ s443