🕷️ Crawler Inspector

URL Lookup

Direct Parameter Lookup

Raw Queries and Responses

1. Shard Calculation

Query:

Response:

Calculated Shard: 109 (from laksa147)

2. Crawled Status Check

Query:

curl -X POST \
  'http://laksa109.int.ahrefs:8124/' \
  -H 'Content-Type: text/plain' \
  -H 'X-ClickHouse-Database: crawler3' \
  -H 'Authorization: Basic YXBpOg==' \
  -d 'SELECT getAhrefsURLFromUnparsed(src_unparsed) AS found_url, ifNull(toUnixTimestamp(download_stamp), 0) AS crawl_time, ifNull(toUnixTimestamp(props_url_first_seen), 0) AS first_indexed_time, download_http_code AS http_code, src_unparsed AS src_unparsed, src_root_hash AS src_root_hash, history_drop_reason AS history_drop_reason, meta_title AS meta_title, meta_descriptions AS meta_descriptions, attrs_boilerpipe_text AS attrs_boilerpipe_text, attrs_markdown AS attrs_markdown, attrs_readable_markdown AS attrs_readable_markdown, meta_canonical AS meta_canonical FROM crawler3.page_info_local FINAL PREWHERE (src_root_hash, src_unparsed) IN ((getAhrefsRootHashFromUnparsed(getAhrefsUnparsedNoserviceFromURL(\'https://runrepeat.com/nike-structure-plus\')), getAhrefsUnparsedNoserviceFromURL(\'https://runrepeat.com/nike-structure-plus\'))) FORMAT JSONEachRow'

Response:

{"found_url":"https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/nike-structure-plus","crawl_time":1775415246,"first_indexed_time":1773113883,"http_code":200,"src_unparsed":"com,runrepeat!\/nike-structure-plus s443","src_root_hash":"17533309727837234909","history_drop_reason":null,"meta_title":"Cut in half: Nike Structure Plus Review (2026) | RunRepeat","meta_descriptions":["Nike Structure Plus review: The Nike Structure Plus delivers a very unusual mix, combining a stability-focused platform with a street-ready design and a ZoomX layer of foam. Based on our lab tests and running sessions, we found it dependable for easy runs and very comfortable for everyday wear. The midsole feels soft and protective, which we really appreciated during relaxed miles. However, the ride feels muted for a ZoomX shoe, and the heavier build together with the premium price makes it less appealing for runners seeking a more versatile daily trainer."],"attrs_boilerpipe_text":"Who should buy\nIn our opinion, the Nike Structure Plus is a compelling option for:\nRunners loyal to Nike who want the brand’s most advanced stability trainer so far.\nThose who prefer stability shoes with a classic geometry instead of aggressive rocker designs.\nAnyone looking for a daily trainer that blends sneaker-style looks with amazing support.\nLong-time Structure fans who want a step up in tech and comfort. The added ZoomX layer and new upper bring a more premium feel compared to previous versions.\nWho should NOT buy\nThe main drawback of the Nike Structure Plus is its high price. In our view, many runners will struggle to justify that cost for simple daily mileage. We think beginners especially may hesitate too, particularly when more affordable options like the\nNike Structure 26\nor the\nASICS GT 2000 14\ndeliver reliable support and similar versatility.\nYour browser does not support the video tag.\nWe also believe the shoe’s weight hurts its overall experience. During our runs it felt noticeably bottom-heavy and far from a fast-paced trainer when pushing the pace. From our perspective, lighter stability options like the\nSaucony Tempus 2\nor the\nHOKA Arahi 8\noffer a more agile feel and can even handle some tempo sessions.\nCushioning\nShock absorption\nThe midsole of the Structure Plus is clearly thick, so we expected above-average results in our shock absorption test. After completing all procedures, we measured 140 SA in the heel and 110 SA in the forefoot, which is solid for everyday runs but not especially impressive.\nHowever, for runners seeking a bit more cushioning than the regular Structure 26 (132 SA \/ 99 SA), Nike delivers.\nHeel\nForefoot\nStructure Plus\n140 SA\nAverage\n130 SA\nCompared to 341 running shoes\nNumber of shoes\n52 SA\nShock absorption\n173 SA\nEnergy return\nThe ZoomX logo looked promising, yet during our runs the shoe felt far from pogo-stick bouncy, if anything the opposite. Indeed, our lab results confirmed this impression, showing just 58.2% energy return in the heel and 65.2% in the forefoot.\nThe forefoot contains more ZoomX relative to ReactX, so the difference between both measurements makes sense. Consequently, with these numbers the shoe will feel a tiny bit energetic but only for midfoot and forefoot strikers.\nHeel\nForefoot\nStructure Plus\n58.2%\nAverage\n58.6%\nCompared to 338 running shoes\nNumber of shoes\n38.0%\nEnergy return\n83.0%\nHeel stack\nAt 40.9 mm, Nike went fully maximalist with the Structure Plus, and that is exactly how the shoe feels underfoot. As soon as we started running in it, we immediately noticed how elevated our feet sit above the ground.\nHowever, do not be misled by the massive sidewalls that Nike designed to help prevent the arch from collapsing. The platform is tall, but not\nthat\ntall.\nStructure Plus\n40.9 mm\nAverage\n35.0 mm\nCompared to 533 running shoes\nNumber of shoes\n22.5 mm\nHeel stack\n48.1 mm\nForefoot stack\nThe forefoot rises 29.7 mm from the ground, offering plenty of foam for easy runs and delivering the solid cushioning as we observed earlier in our shock absorption test.\nStructure Plus\n29.7 mm\nAverage\n26.4 mm\nCompared to 533 running shoes\nNumber of shoes\n13.7 mm\nForefoot stack\n38.5 mm\nDrop\nMost runners are used to Nike deploying a high drop in its\ndaily running shoes\n, and we found that the Structure Plus follows that same steep geometry. With 11.2 mm of actual heel-to-toe drop, it's clear to us that rearfoot strikers will feel right at home in this shoe.\nStructure Plus\n11.2 mm\nAverage\n8.6 mm\nCompared to 533 running shoes\nNumber of shoes\n-0.1 mm\nDrop\n16.1 mm\nMidsole softness\nUpdated\nNote: Low measurement: softer. High measurement: firmer.\nThe ZoomX logo is not as impressive today as it once was. Nike has adjusted the formula using a TPE foam instead of Pebax for training shoes, and many other brands now use premium foams in their trainers.\nYour browser does not support the video tag.\nHowever, after testing the shoe ourselves we still found that this version of ZoomX performs well for the Structure Plus, delivering a plush and forgiving ride underfoot. Our Asker C durometer measured 29.5 AC for the top layer, which is clearly softer than the average.\nStructure Plus\n29.5 AC\nAverage\n36.1 AC\nCompared to 191 running shoes\nNumber of shoes\n19.6 AC\nMidsole softness (soft to firm)\n54.0 AC\nSecondary foam\nUpdated\nNote: Low measurement: softer. High measurement: firmer.\nThe dual-foam design of the Nike Structure Plus places ReactX beneath ZoomX, and that positioning is no coincidence. ZoomX brings softness and energy return, while ReactX adds stability and durability.\nHowever, ReactX also makes the ride feel more muted and less lively. In our durometer test it measured 37.7 AC, confirming its firmer nature, which is expected in a stability-focused shoe anyway.\nStructure Plus\n37.7 AC\nAverage\n39.4 AC\nCompared to 82 running shoes\nNumber of shoes\n23.6 AC\nSecondary foam (soft to firm)\n64.0 AC\nRocker\nSome brands are moving toward highly rockered designs on every shoe, but Nike avoids that approach with the Structure Plus. In our view, that is a sensible decision for a stability daily trainer.\nThis design makes the shoe a strong option for runners who prefer a more classic midsole geometry. It also feels more natural when walking or wearing the shoe casually, which seems like something Nike clearly considered when creating this sneaker-friendly design.\nSize and fit\nNike Structure Plus fits\ntrue to size\n(29 votes).\nSmall\nTrue to size\nLarge\nInternal length\nNote: Our testing shows that internal length is not a great measure of fit. But, as many users have requested this specific test, we've decided to add it for those interested.\nStructure Plus\n272.9 mm\nAverage\n269.5 mm\nCompared to 276 running shoes\nNumber of shoes\n259.5 mm\nInternal length\n277.6 mm\nWidth \/ Fit\nAs with every shoe we test, we purchased the Nike Structure Plus in US 9 with standard width. It is also worth noting that Nike offers this model in a Wide version, although availability may vary by market.\nYour browser does not support the video tag.\nThat said, we began taking measurements on our pair. With 93.4 mm in our first reading, it shows a classic Nike fit that likely will not suit wide feet well, though we still needed to complete the rest of our measurements.\nStructure Plus\n93.4 mm\nAverage\n95.2 mm\nCompared to 288 running shoes\nNumber of shoes\n88.5 mm\nWidth \/ Fit\n101.4 mm\nToebox width\nThe second measurement also came in slightly below average at 72.5 mm, though only by a small margin. We consider it a very standard fit, and we believe anyone who has worn Nike shoes before will find the feel familiar on foot.\nStructure Plus\n72.5 mm\nAverage\n73.3 mm\nCompared to 288 running shoes\nNumber of shoes\n66.7 mm\nToebox width\n82.6 mm\nToebox height\nToebox height follows the same pattern as the previous two measurements, so there are no surprises here.\nYour browser does not support the video tag.\nAt 26.0 mm, the figure feels reasonable to us, especially since stability shoes often benefit from a slightly snugger fit to help contain lateral forces and improve support.\nStructure Plus\n26.0 mm\nAverage\n27.0 mm\nCompared to 288 running shoes\nNumber of shoes\n22.0 mm\nToebox height\n34.1 mm\nTraction \/ Grip\nTraction test\nOne area that needed improvement from the regular Structure was traction. We previously measured 0.37, and fortunately the Plus version raises that figure to a more acceptable 0.51.\nIt is still not impressive, but it now delivers dependable grip, even when running in the rain.\nStructure Plus\n0.51\nAverage\n0.50\nCompared to 332 running shoes\nNumber of shoes\n0.11\nForefoot traction\n0.89\nOutsole design\nThe outsole keeps a very similar layout to the Structure 26, preserving most of its design DNA with only small visual tweaks. It combines black \"YC O-LITE\" rubber in the forefoot with bright green \"OG\/RS 002\" high abrasion rubber panels across the midfoot and heel.\nThe rearfoot and midfoot rubber provide solid protection, especially because the rubber sits clearly higher than the exposed foam. We also noted a very deep cutout in the center of the heel that helps with foam compression too.\nFlexibility \/ Stiffness\nTo enjoy the Nike Structure Plus, you definitely need to be a fan of longitudinally stiff shoes. With 19.3N in our lab test, it quickly becomes a no-go for runners who prefer a more flexible feel underfoot.\nStructure Plus\n19.3N\nAverage\n15.5N\nCompared to 335 running shoes\nNumber of shoes\n3.9N\nFlexibility\nStiffness\n28.5N\nWeight\nThe Nike Structure Plus is only 1% lighter than the Structure 26, coming in at 10.3 oz or 292g. That small reduction hardly changes the experience, and the shoe still sits on the heavier side of the current market.\nFor daily mileage it can work, yet during our testing the shoe felt somewhat bottom heavy. In our opinion, this is a missed opportunity for\nNike\nto gain ground against strong rivals like the\nASICS Gel Kayano 32\n.\nStructure Plus\n10.3 oz (292g)\nAverage\n9.3 oz (264g)\nCompared to 534 running shoes\nNumber of shoes\n5.3 oz (149g)\nWeight\n12.9 oz (366g)\nBreathability\nOne thing we all should demand from Nike is amazing materials in the Plus and Premium versions of its daily trainers. In this case, we think the Structure Plus delivers on that expectation.\nYour browser does not support the video tag.\nThe upper feels noticeably better than the one found in the regular version. It improves breathability to a 4 out of 5 score while maintaining the same comfortable overall feel.\nYour browser does not support the video tag.\nNike organizes the upper into three clear zones: a well-ventilated forefoot, a very dense heel designed for stability, and a balanced construction through the midfoot area.\nWhen we examined the upper with our digital microscope, the jump in quality became clear. The mesh looks softer and more refined, and the ventilation holes appear well distributed.\nHandling the shoe confirms that comfort was a clear priority here. The heel padding is extremely generous, and all the materials feel soft and pleasant to the touch.\nYour browser does not support the video tag.\nStructure Plus\n4\nAverage\n3.6\nCompared to 463 running shoes\nNumber of shoes\n1\nBreathability\n5\nStability\nLateral stability test\nThe Nike Structure Plus continues to use Nike’s Midfoot Support System to help stabilize the ride and limit pronation. It worked well on the regular Structure, and here Nike made it more pronounced to match the higher stack height of this version.\nThe support feels unobtrusive, and it's a good option for those who overpronate as well as neutral runners seeking a more controlled ride, without the harsh feel of older stability shoes. Oh, and we also really liked how Nike integrated support into the upper in a subtle and visually clean way.\nTorsional rigidity\nThe Structure Plus has a more flexible structure than many stability shoes, which also makes it more comfortable for everyday wear as a sneaker. We rated it 4\/5.\nStructure Plus\n4\nAverage\n3.5\nCompared to 512 running shoes\nNumber of shoes\n1\nTorsional rigidity\n5\nHeel counter stiffness\nThe heel counter also scored 4\/5 instead of the maximum rating, which is uncommon for this type of shoe. We appreciate having an alternative like this in the market, offering solid stability without that overly stiff feel on foot.\nStructure Plus\n4\nAverage\n3\nCompared to 496 running shoes\nNumber of shoes\n1\nHeel counter stiffness\n5\nMidsole width - forefoot\nThe midsole width follows the same pattern we saw in previous tests, showing a moderate rather than extreme design.\nYour browser does not support the video tag.\nWe measured 119.4 mm, which is clearly wider than a neutral trainer but still narrower than some max-stack stability options.\nStructure Plus\n119.4 mm\nAverage\n114.5 mm\nCompared to 534 running shoes\nNumber of shoes\n102.2 mm\nMidsole width - forefoot\n127.9 mm\nMidsole width - heel\nMoving our calipers to the heel, we measured 94.7 mm. Once again, this reflects what we consistently observed in this shoe, a less aggressive and more beginner-friendly approach to stability.\nStructure Plus\n94.7 mm\nAverage\n90.7 mm\nCompared to 534 running shoes\nNumber of shoes\n70.8 mm\nMidsole width - heel\n106.6 mm\nDurability\nToebox durability\nAfter evaluating the breathability of the Structure Plus, we moved to the durability section of our lab to see how the upper holds up under stress. Ventilated uppers like this often struggle here, and this one followed that pattern with a modest 2\/5 result.\nStructure Plus\n2\nAverage\n2.6\nCompared to 397 running shoes\nNumber of shoes\n1\nToebox durability\n5\nHeel padding durability\nFortunately, the super-plush heel padding performed much better in our test. This time it earned a solid 4 out of 5.\nStructure Plus\n4\nAverage\n3.3\nCompared to 391 running shoes\nNumber of shoes\n1\nHeel padding durability\n5\nOutsole durability\nNike has rarely been a market leader in outsole grip or durability when relying on its own compounds... and yes, Vibram-equipped trail models like the\nUltrafly\ndo not count here. With the Structure Plus, however, we were satisfied, as our test showed solid durability with only 0.9 mm of rubber worn away.\nStructure Plus\n0.9 mm\nAverage\n1.1 mm\nCompared to 375 running shoes\nNumber of shoes\n0.0 mm\nOutsole wear\n2.0 mm\nOutsole thickness\nThe outsole also offers a generous thickness of 3.4 mm. Combined with the durability result we observed, we believe runners can feel confident about the long-term wear of the shoe.\nStructure Plus\n3.4 mm\nAverage\n3.2 mm\nCompared to 530 running shoes\nNumber of shoes\n0.5 mm\nOutsole thickness\n6.1 mm\nMisc\nInsole thickness\nThe insole is quite basic, made from EVA foam, and adds 4.9 mm of cushioning to the Structure Plus.\nStructure Plus\n4.9 mm\nAverage\n4.5 mm\nCompared to 528 running shoes\nNumber of shoes\n1.5 mm\nInsole thickness\n7.8 mm\nRemovable insole\nRemoving the insole from the Structure Plus is quick and easy. And yes, we know it is a road shoe, thanks Nike!\nStructure Plus\nYes\nMidsole softness in cold (%)\nRunners planning to use the Structure Plus in very cold weather will appreciate this lab result. It became only 2% firmer after spending 20 minutes in our freezer.\nStructure Plus\n2%\nAverage\n23%\nCompared to 458 running shoes\nNumber of shoes\n0%\nMidsole softness in cold\n63%\nReflective elements\nNike includes reflective elements on the heel, but we did not find them particularly impressive. If anything, they felt rather underwhelming.\nStructure Plus\nYes\nTongue padding\nWe noticed that Nike slightly updated the lacing system compared to the regular Structure, yet the overall fit feels very similar. The laces also pass twice under a central tongue loop, helping reduce unwanted tongue movement during runs.\nThe step-in feel is comfortable thanks to a thick tongue with 7.9 mm of padding, which feels more than sufficient for running and everyday wear. Considering the already high weight of the shoe, adding more padding looks like a bad idea.\nStructure Plus\n7.9 mm\nAverage\n5.7 mm\nCompared to 531 running shoes\nNumber of shoes\n0.4 mm\nTongue padding\n14.2 mm\nTongue: gusset type\nThe tongue is not gusseted to the sides, which feels disappointing for a shoe at this price point. It is a tough pill to swallow.\nStructure Plus\nNone\nHeel tab\nThe heel collar curves inward with plush padding, delivering secure ankle lockdown while skipping the a finger loop tab.\nStructure Plus\nNone\nPrice\nThe Plus label in the Structure name does not bring encouraging news for the price, just as we saw with the\nPegasus Plus\n. Consequently, the cost can feel quite steep given its performance and relatively muted ride.\nHowever, it can be a worthwhile upgrade for runners seeking the next step beyond the regular Structure, as it introduces an approach to stability that Nike has not offered before with the use of ZoomX foam. And the fact that the shoe also works so easily as a sneaker helps with the high price too.\nStructure Plus\nC$290\nCompared to 534 running shoes\nNumber of shoes\n$60\nPrice\n$300","attrs_markdown":"[Hiring remote: Content writer \/ review specialist in](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/hiring)\n\n- Reviews\n  - - Back\n    - [Running](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/running-shoes)\n    - [Hiking](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/hiking-footwear)\n    - [Track and XC](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/track-spikes-and-xc)\n    - [Walking](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/walking-shoes)\n  - - [Training](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/training-shoes)\n    - [Tennis](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/tennis-shoes)\n    - [Basketball](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/basketball-shoes)\n    - [Sneakers](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/sneakers)\n- [Buying guides](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/guides)\n- Deals\n  - - Back\n    - [Running](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/deals\/running-shoes)\n    - [Hiking boots](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/deals\/hiking-boots)\n    - [Hiking shoes](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/deals\/hiking-shoes)\n    - [Hiking sandals](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/deals\/hiking-sandals)\n    - [Track spikes](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/deals\/track-spikes)\n    - [Cross country](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/deals\/cross-country-shoes)\n  - - [Walking](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/deals\/walking-shoes)\n    - [Training](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/deals\/training-shoes)\n    - [Tennis](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/deals\/tennis-shoes)\n    - [Basketball](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/deals\/basketball-shoes)\n    - [Sneakers](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/deals\/sneakers)\n\n- [Running shoes](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/running-shoes)\n- [Nike](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/nike-running-shoes)\n- Nike Structure Plus\n\n# Nike Structure Plus review\nNew\n\n[![Carlos Sánchez](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/images\/experts\/carlos-sanchez-sm.jpg)](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/author\/carlos-sanchez \"Carlos Sánchez\")\n\n[Carlos Sánchez](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/author\/carlos-sanchez) on  Mar 9, 2026\n\n\\| Reviewed using [methodology 2.2](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/testing-methodology)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_primary\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-24583634-main.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_primary\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-24583634-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-24583667-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus parts](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-parts-24583669-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus cut](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-cut-24583668-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Shock absorption heel](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-shock-absorption-heel-24583638-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Energy return heel](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-energy-return-heel-24583635-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Side](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-side-24583679-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Heel stack](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-heel-stack-24583644-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Forefoot stack](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-forefoot-stack-24583643-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Drop](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-drop-24583646-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus ZoomX Foam](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-zoom-x-foam-24583670-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Midsole softness](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-midsole-softness-24583642-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus ReactX](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-react-x-24583671-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Secondary foam softness](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-secondary-foam-softness-24583640-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Rocker](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-rocker-24583647-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Internal length](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-internal-length-24583663-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Gel](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-gel-24583672-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Width \/ Fit](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-width-fit-24583660-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Toebox width](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-toebox-width-24583662-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus toes](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-toes-24589581-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Toebox height](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-toebox-height-24583659-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Forefoot traction](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-forefoot-traction-24583652-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Outsole design](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-outsole-design-24583654-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Flexibility \/ Stiffness](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-flexibility-stiffness-24583641-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Weight](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-weight-24583648-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus microscope](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-microscope-24583675-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus smoke](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-smoke-24583673-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Light](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-light-24583674-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus microscope](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-microscope-2-24583676-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus upper](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-upper-24583677-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Midfoot Support System](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-midfoot-support-system-24583666-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Lateral stability test](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-lateral-stability-test-24583650-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Torsional rigidity](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-torsional-rigidity-24583651-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Heel counter stiffness](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-heel-counter-stiffness-24583649-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus run](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-run-24583678-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Midsole width - forefoot](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-midsole-width-forefoot-24583655-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Midsole width - heel](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-midsole-width-heel-24583658-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Toebox durability](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-toebox-durability-24583639-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Heel padding durability](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-heel-padding-durability-24583636-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Outsole durability](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-outsole-durability-24583637-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Outsole thickness](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-outsole-thickness-24583645-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Insole thickness](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-insole-thickness-24583665-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Removable insole](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-removable-insole-24583656-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Midsole softness in cold (%)](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-midsole-softness-in-cold-24583681-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Reflective elements](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-reflective-elements-24583653-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus laces](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-laces-24583680-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Tongue padding](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-tongue-padding-24583661-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Tongue: gusset type](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-tongue-gusset-type-24583657-120.jpg)\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Heel tab](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-heel-tab-24583664-120.jpg)\n\n## Our verdict\nThe Nike Structure Plus delivers a very unusual mix, combining a stability-focused platform with a street-ready design and a ZoomX layer of foam. Based on our lab tests and running sessions, we found it dependable for easy runs and very comfortable for everyday wear. The midsole feels soft and protective, which we really appreciated during relaxed miles. However, the ride feels muted for a ZoomX shoe, and the heavier build together with the premium price makes it less appealing for runners seeking a more versatile daily trainer.\n\n- Top pick in  [best long distance Nike running shoes](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/guides\/best-nike-long-distance-running-shoes)\n- Top pick in  [best Nike road running shoes](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/guides\/best-nike-road-running-shoes)\n\n### Pros\n- Finally some plush ZoomX in the Structure\n- Good shock absorption\n- Doubles as a sneaker and looks super cool\n- HIgh drop suits heel strikers\n- Improved traction\n- Premium upper with solid ventilation\n- Durable outsole\n- Smooth, non-intrusive stability system\n- Excellent step-in comfort\n\n### Cons\n- Heavy\n- Still feels muted despite ZoomX\n- Non-gusseted tongue\n\n### Audience verdict\n90\n\nSuperb\\!\n\n- Top 10% in  [road running shoes](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/road-running-shoes)\n- Top 13% in  [Nike running shoes](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/nike-running-shoes)\n- Top 14% most popular running shoes\n\n## Comparison\nThe most similar running shoes compared\n\nWords (e.g. \"High\")\n\nNumbers (e.g. \"73%\")\n\n|   | [![Nike Structure Plus](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_primary\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-24583634-120.jpg) Nike Structure Plus](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/nike-structure-plus) | [![Nike Structure 26](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_primary\/40934\/nike-structure-26-23498208-120.jpg) Nike Structure 26](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/nike-structure-26) | [![Brooks Glycerin GTS 22](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_primary\/40659\/brooks-glycerin-gts-22-22723084-120.jpg) Brooks Glycerin GTS 22](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/brooks-glycerin-gts-22) | [![New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_primary\/40383\/new-balance-fresh-foam-x-860-v-14-22110006-120.jpg) New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/new-balance-fresh-foam-x-860-v14) | \\+ \\+ Add a shoe |\n|---|---|---|---|---|---|\n| Audience score | 90 Superb\\! | 85 Good\\! | 79 Good\\! | 85 Good\\! |   |\n| Price | \\$170 | \\$145 | \\$165 | \\$140 |   |\n| Pace | Daily running | Daily running | Daily running | Daily running |   |\n| Shock absorption | High | High | Moderate | Moderate |   |\n| Energy return | Moderate | Moderate | Low | Moderate |   |\n| Traction | High | Moderate | Moderate | High |   |\n| Arch support | Stability | Stability | Stability | Stability |   |\n| Weight lab Weight brand | 10\\.3 oz \/ 292g 10\\.9 oz \/ 309g | 10\\.4 oz \/ 296g 10\\.5 oz \/ 298g | 10\\.8 oz \/ 305g 10\\.7 oz \/ 303g | 10\\.4 oz \/ 295g 10\\.5 oz \/ 298g |   |\n| Drop lab Drop brand | 11\\.2 mm 10\\.0 mm | 10\\.1 mm 10\\.0 mm | 10\\.1 mm 10\\.0 mm | 9\\.3 mm 8\\.0 mm |   |\n| Strike pattern | Heel | Heel | Heel | HeelMid\/forefoot |   |\n| Size | True to size | Slightly small | True to size | Slightly small |   |\n| Midsole softness | Soft | Balanced | Balanced | Soft |   |\n| Difference in midsole softness in cold | Small | Small | Normal | Big |   |\n| Toebox durability | Decent | Decent | Decent | Decent |   |\n| Heel padding durability | Good | Good | Good | Bad |   |\n| Outsole durability | Good | Good | Good | Decent |   |\n| Breathability | Moderate | Moderate | Breathable | Moderate |   |\n| Width \/ fit | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |   |\n| Toebox width | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |   |\n| Stiffness | Stiff | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate |   |\n| Torsional rigidity | Stiff | Stiff | Stiff | Moderate |   |\n| Heel counter stiffness | Stiff | Moderate | Moderate | Stiff |   |\n| Heel lab Heel brand | 40\\.9 mm 42\\.0 mm | 36\\.1 mm 38\\.0 mm | 37\\.8 mm 39\\.0 mm | 36\\.8 mm 38\\.0 mm |   |\n| Forefoot lab Forefoot brand | 29\\.7 mm 32\\.0 mm | 26\\.0 mm 28\\.0 mm | 27\\.7 mm 29\\.0 mm | 27\\.5 mm 30\\.0 mm |   |\n| Widths available | NormalWide | NormalWideX-Wide | NormalWideX-Wide | NarrowNormalWideX-Wide |   |\n| Orthotic friendly | � | � | � | � |   |\n| Season | All seasons | All seasons | SummerAll seasons | All seasons |   |\n| Removable insole | � | � | � | � |   |\n| Ranking | \\#32 Top 9% | \\#251 Bottom 36% | \\#330 Bottom 16% | \\#220 Bottom 44% |   |\n| Popularity | \\#55 Top 14% | \\#49 Top 13% | \\#51 Top 13% | \\#27 Top 7% |   |\n\nSee more\n\n## Who should buy\nIn our opinion, the Nike Structure Plus is a compelling option for:\n\n- Runners loyal to Nike who want the brand’s most advanced stability trainer so far.\n- Those who prefer stability shoes with a classic geometry instead of aggressive rocker designs.\n- Anyone looking for a daily trainer that blends sneaker-style looks with amazing support.\n- Long-time Structure fans who want a step up in tech and comfort. The added ZoomX layer and new upper bring a more premium feel compared to previous versions.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-24583667-main.jpg)\n\n## Who should NOT buy\nThe main drawback of the Nike Structure Plus is its high price. In our view, many runners will struggle to justify that cost for simple daily mileage. We think beginners especially may hesitate too, particularly when more affordable options like the [Nike Structure 26](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/nike-structure-26) or the [ASICS GT 2000 14](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/asics-gt-2000-14) deliver reliable support and similar versatility.\n\nYour browser does not support the video tag.\n\nWe also believe the shoe’s weight hurts its overall experience. During our runs it felt noticeably bottom-heavy and far from a fast-paced trainer when pushing the pace. From our perspective, lighter stability options like the [Saucony Tempus 2](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/saucony-tempus-2) or the [HOKA Arahi 8](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/hoka-arahi-8) offer a more agile feel and can even handle some tempo sessions.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus parts](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-parts-24583669-main.jpg)\n## Cushioning\n### Shock absorption\nThe midsole of the Structure Plus is clearly thick, so we expected above-average results in our shock absorption test. After completing all procedures, we measured 140 SA in the heel and 110 SA in the forefoot, which is solid for everyday runs but not especially impressive.\n\nHowever, for runners seeking a bit more cushioning than the regular Structure 26 (132 SA \/ 99 SA), Nike delivers.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Shock absorption heel](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-shock-absorption-heel-24583638-main.jpg)\n\nHeel\n\nForefoot\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 140 SA |\n| Average | 130 SA |\n\nCompared to 341 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n52 SA\n\nShock absorption\n\n173 SA\n\n### Energy return\nThe ZoomX logo looked promising, yet during our runs the shoe felt far from pogo-stick bouncy, if anything the opposite. Indeed, our lab results confirmed this impression, showing just 58.2% energy return in the heel and 65.2% in the forefoot.\n\nThe forefoot contains more ZoomX relative to ReactX, so the difference between both measurements makes sense. Consequently, with these numbers the shoe will feel a tiny bit energetic but only for midfoot and forefoot strikers.\n\nHeel\n\nForefoot\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 58\\.2% |\n| Average | 58\\.6% |\n\nCompared to 338 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n38\\.0%\n\nEnergy return\n\n83\\.0%\n\n### Heel stack\nAt 40.9 mm, Nike went fully maximalist with the Structure Plus, and that is exactly how the shoe feels underfoot. As soon as we started running in it, we immediately noticed how elevated our feet sit above the ground.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Side](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-side-24583679-main.jpg)\n\nHowever, do not be misled by the massive sidewalls that Nike designed to help prevent the arch from collapsing. The platform is tall, but not *that* tall.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Heel stack](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-heel-stack-24583644-main.jpg)\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 40\\.9 mm |\n| Average | 35\\.0 mm |\n\nCompared to 533 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n22\\.5 mm\n\nHeel stack\n\n48\\.1 mm\n\n### Forefoot stack\nThe forefoot rises 29.7 mm from the ground, offering plenty of foam for easy runs and delivering the solid cushioning as we observed earlier in our shock absorption test.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Forefoot stack](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-forefoot-stack-24583643-main.jpg)\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 29\\.7 mm |\n| Average | 26\\.4 mm |\n\nCompared to 533 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n13\\.7 mm\n\nForefoot stack\n\n38\\.5 mm\n\n### Drop\nMost runners are used to Nike deploying a high drop in its [daily running shoes](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/daily-running-running-shoes), and we found that the Structure Plus follows that same steep geometry. With 11.2 mm of actual heel-to-toe drop, it's clear to us that rearfoot strikers will feel right at home in this shoe.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Drop](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-drop-24583646-main.jpg)\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 11\\.2 mm |\n| Average | 8\\.6 mm |\n\nCompared to 533 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n\\-0.1 mm\n\nDrop\n\n16\\.1 mm\n\n### Midsole softness\nUpdated\n\nNote: Low measurement: softer. High measurement: firmer.\n\nThe ZoomX logo is not as impressive today as it once was. Nike has adjusted the formula using a TPE foam instead of Pebax for training shoes, and many other brands now use premium foams in their trainers.\n\nYour browser does not support the video tag.\n\nHowever, after testing the shoe ourselves we still found that this version of ZoomX performs well for the Structure Plus, delivering a plush and forgiving ride underfoot. Our Asker C durometer measured 29.5 AC for the top layer, which is clearly softer than the average.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Midsole softness](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-midsole-softness-24583642-main.jpg)\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 29\\.5 AC |\n| Average | 36\\.1 AC |\n\nCompared to 191 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n19\\.6 AC\n\nMidsole softness (soft to firm)\n\n54\\.0 AC\n\n### Secondary foam\nUpdated\n\nNote: Low measurement: softer. High measurement: firmer.\n\nThe dual-foam design of the Nike Structure Plus places ReactX beneath ZoomX, and that positioning is no coincidence. ZoomX brings softness and energy return, while ReactX adds stability and durability.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus ReactX](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-react-x-24583671-main.jpg)\n\nHowever, ReactX also makes the ride feel more muted and less lively. In our durometer test it measured 37.7 AC, confirming its firmer nature, which is expected in a stability-focused shoe anyway.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Secondary foam softness](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-secondary-foam-softness-24583640-main.jpg)\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 37\\.7 AC |\n| Average | 39\\.4 AC |\n\nCompared to 82 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n23\\.6 AC\n\nSecondary foam (soft to firm)\n\n64\\.0 AC\n\n### Rocker\nSome brands are moving toward highly rockered designs on every shoe, but Nike avoids that approach with the Structure Plus. In our view, that is a sensible decision for a stability daily trainer.\n\nThis design makes the shoe a strong option for runners who prefer a more classic midsole geometry. It also feels more natural when walking or wearing the shoe casually, which seems like something Nike clearly considered when creating this sneaker-friendly design.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Rocker](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-rocker-24583647-main.jpg)\n## Size and fit\n### Size\nNike Structure Plus fits **true to size** (29 votes).\n\nSmall\n\nTrue to size\n\nLarge\n\n### Internal length\nNote: Our testing shows that internal length is not a great measure of fit. But, as many users have requested this specific test, we've decided to add it for those interested.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Internal length](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-internal-length-24583663-main.jpg)\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 272\\.9 mm |\n| Average | 269\\.5 mm |\n\nCompared to 276 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n259\\.5 mm\n\nInternal length\n\n277\\.6 mm\n\n### Width \/ Fit\nAs with every shoe we test, we purchased the Nike Structure Plus in US 9 with standard width. It is also worth noting that Nike offers this model in a Wide version, although availability may vary by market.\n\nYour browser does not support the video tag.\n\nThat said, we began taking measurements on our pair. With 93.4 mm in our first reading, it shows a classic Nike fit that likely will not suit wide feet well, though we still needed to complete the rest of our measurements.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Width \/ Fit](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-width-fit-24583660-main.jpg)\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 93\\.4 mm |\n| Average | 95\\.2 mm |\n\nCompared to 288 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n88\\.5 mm\n\nWidth \/ Fit\n\n101\\.4 mm\n\n### Toebox width\nThe second measurement also came in slightly below average at 72.5 mm, though only by a small margin. We consider it a very standard fit, and we believe anyone who has worn Nike shoes before will find the feel familiar on foot.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Toebox width](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-toebox-width-24583662-main.jpg)\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 72\\.5 mm |\n| Average | 73\\.3 mm |\n\nCompared to 288 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n66\\.7 mm\n\nToebox width\n\n82\\.6 mm\n\n### Toebox height\nToebox height follows the same pattern as the previous two measurements, so there are no surprises here.\n\nYour browser does not support the video tag.\n\nAt 26.0 mm, the figure feels reasonable to us, especially since stability shoes often benefit from a slightly snugger fit to help contain lateral forces and improve support.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Toebox height](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-toebox-height-24583659-main.jpg)\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 26\\.0 mm |\n| Average | 27\\.0 mm |\n\nCompared to 288 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n22\\.0 mm\n\nToebox height\n\n34\\.1 mm\n## Traction \/ Grip\n### Traction test\nOne area that needed improvement from the regular Structure was traction. We previously measured 0.37, and fortunately the Plus version raises that figure to a more acceptable 0.51.\n\nIt is still not impressive, but it now delivers dependable grip, even when running in the rain.\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 0\\.51 |\n| Average | 0\\.50 |\n\nCompared to 332 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n0\\.11\n\nForefoot traction\n\n0\\.89\n\n### Outsole design\nThe outsole keeps a very similar layout to the Structure 26, preserving most of its design DNA with only small visual tweaks. It combines black \"YC O-LITE\" rubber in the forefoot with bright green \"OG\/RS 002\" high abrasion rubber panels across the midfoot and heel.\n\nThe rearfoot and midfoot rubber provide solid protection, especially because the rubber sits clearly higher than the exposed foam. We also noted a very deep cutout in the center of the heel that helps with foam compression too.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Outsole design](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-outsole-design-24583654-main.jpg)\n## Flexibility \/ Stiffness\nTo enjoy the Nike Structure Plus, you definitely need to be a fan of longitudinally stiff shoes. With 19.3N in our lab test, it quickly becomes a no-go for runners who prefer a more flexible feel underfoot.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Flexibility \/ Stiffness](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-flexibility-stiffness-24583641-main.jpg)\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 19\\.3N |\n| Average | 15\\.5N |\n\nCompared to 335 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n3\\.9N\n\nFlexibility\n\nStiffness\n\n28\\.5N\n## Weight\nThe Nike Structure Plus is only 1% lighter than the Structure 26, coming in at 10.3 oz or 292g. That small reduction hardly changes the experience, and the shoe still sits on the heavier side of the current market.\n\nFor daily mileage it can work, yet during our testing the shoe felt somewhat bottom heavy. In our opinion, this is a missed opportunity for [Nike](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/nike-running-shoes) to gain ground against strong rivals like the [ASICS Gel Kayano 32](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/asics-gel-kayano-32).\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Weight](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-weight-24583648-main.jpg)\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 10\\.3 oz (292g) |\n| Average | 9\\.3 oz (264g) |\n\nCompared to 534 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n5\\.3 oz (149g)\n\nWeight\n\n12\\.9 oz (366g)\n## Breathability\nOne thing we all should demand from Nike is amazing materials in the Plus and Premium versions of its daily trainers. In this case, we think the Structure Plus delivers on that expectation.\n\nYour browser does not support the video tag.\n\nThe upper feels noticeably better than the one found in the regular version. It improves breathability to a 4 out of 5 score while maintaining the same comfortable overall feel.\n\nYour browser does not support the video tag.\n\nNike organizes the upper into three clear zones: a well-ventilated forefoot, a very dense heel designed for stability, and a balanced construction through the midfoot area.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus microscope](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-microscope-24583675-main.jpg)\n\nWhen we examined the upper with our digital microscope, the jump in quality became clear. The mesh looks softer and more refined, and the ventilation holes appear well distributed.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus microscope](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-microscope-2-24583676-main.jpg)\n\nHandling the shoe confirms that comfort was a clear priority here. The heel padding is extremely generous, and all the materials feel soft and pleasant to the touch.\n\nYour browser does not support the video tag.\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 4 |\n| Average | 3\\.6 |\n\nCompared to 463 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n1\n\nBreathability\n\n5\n## Stability\n### Lateral stability test\nThe Nike Structure Plus continues to use Nike’s Midfoot Support System to help stabilize the ride and limit pronation. It worked well on the regular Structure, and here Nike made it more pronounced to match the higher stack height of this version.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Midfoot Support System](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-midfoot-support-system-24583666-main.jpg)\n\nThe support feels unobtrusive, and it's a good option for those who overpronate as well as neutral runners seeking a more controlled ride, without the harsh feel of older stability shoes. Oh, and we also really liked how Nike integrated support into the upper in a subtle and visually clean way.\n\n### Torsional rigidity\nThe Structure Plus has a more flexible structure than many stability shoes, which also makes it more comfortable for everyday wear as a sneaker. We rated it 4\/5.\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 4 |\n| Average | 3\\.5 |\n\nCompared to 512 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n1\n\nTorsional rigidity\n\n5\n\n### Heel counter stiffness\nThe heel counter also scored 4\/5 instead of the maximum rating, which is uncommon for this type of shoe. We appreciate having an alternative like this in the market, offering solid stability without that overly stiff feel on foot.\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 4 |\n| Average | 3 |\n\nCompared to 496 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n1\n\nHeel counter stiffness\n\n5\n\n### Midsole width - forefoot\nThe midsole width follows the same pattern we saw in previous tests, showing a moderate rather than extreme design.\n\nYour browser does not support the video tag.\n\nWe measured 119.4 mm, which is clearly wider than a neutral trainer but still narrower than some max-stack stability options.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Midsole width - forefoot](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-midsole-width-forefoot-24583655-main.jpg)\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 119\\.4 mm |\n| Average | 114\\.5 mm |\n\nCompared to 534 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n102\\.2 mm\n\nMidsole width - forefoot\n\n127\\.9 mm\n\n### Midsole width - heel\nMoving our calipers to the heel, we measured 94.7 mm. Once again, this reflects what we consistently observed in this shoe, a less aggressive and more beginner-friendly approach to stability.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Midsole width - heel](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-midsole-width-heel-24583658-main.jpg)\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 94\\.7 mm |\n| Average | 90\\.7 mm |\n\nCompared to 534 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n70\\.8 mm\n\nMidsole width - heel\n\n106\\.6 mm\n## Durability\n### Toebox durability\nAfter evaluating the breathability of the Structure Plus, we moved to the durability section of our lab to see how the upper holds up under stress. Ventilated uppers like this often struggle here, and this one followed that pattern with a modest 2\/5 result.\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 2 |\n| Average | 2\\.6 |\n\nCompared to 397 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n1\n\nToebox durability\n\n5\n\n### Heel padding durability\nFortunately, the super-plush heel padding performed much better in our test. This time it earned a solid 4 out of 5.\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 4 |\n| Average | 3\\.3 |\n\nCompared to 391 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n1\n\nHeel padding durability\n\n5\n\n### Outsole durability\nNike has rarely been a market leader in outsole grip or durability when relying on its own compounds... and yes, Vibram-equipped trail models like the [Ultrafly](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/nike-ultrafly) do not count here. With the Structure Plus, however, we were satisfied, as our test showed solid durability with only 0.9 mm of rubber worn away.\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 0\\.9 mm |\n| Average | 1\\.1 mm |\n\nCompared to 375 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n0\\.0 mm\n\nOutsole wear\n\n2\\.0 mm\n\n### Outsole thickness\nThe outsole also offers a generous thickness of 3.4 mm. Combined with the durability result we observed, we believe runners can feel confident about the long-term wear of the shoe.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Outsole thickness](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-outsole-thickness-24583645-main.jpg)\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 3\\.4 mm |\n| Average | 3\\.2 mm |\n\nCompared to 530 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n0\\.5 mm\n\nOutsole thickness\n\n6\\.1 mm\n## Misc\n### Insole thickness\nThe insole is quite basic, made from EVA foam, and adds 4.9 mm of cushioning to the Structure Plus.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Insole thickness](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-insole-thickness-24583665-main.jpg)\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 4\\.9 mm |\n| Average | 4\\.5 mm |\n\nCompared to 528 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n1\\.5 mm\n\nInsole thickness\n\n7\\.8 mm\n\n### Removable insole\nRemoving the insole from the Structure Plus is quick and easy. And yes, we know it is a road shoe, thanks Nike\\!\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Removable insole](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-removable-insole-24583656-main.jpg)\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | Yes |\n\n### Midsole softness in cold (%)\nRunners planning to use the Structure Plus in very cold weather will appreciate this lab result. It became only 2% firmer after spending 20 minutes in our freezer.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Midsole softness in cold (%)](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-midsole-softness-in-cold-24583681-main.jpg)\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 2% |\n| Average | 23% |\n\nCompared to 458 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n0%\n\nMidsole softness in cold\n\n63%\n\n### Reflective elements\nNike includes reflective elements on the heel, but we did not find them particularly impressive. If anything, they felt rather underwhelming.\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | Yes |\n\n### Tongue padding\nWe noticed that Nike slightly updated the lacing system compared to the regular Structure, yet the overall fit feels very similar. The laces also pass twice under a central tongue loop, helping reduce unwanted tongue movement during runs.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus laces](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-laces-24583680-main.jpg)\n\nThe step-in feel is comfortable thanks to a thick tongue with 7.9 mm of padding, which feels more than sufficient for running and everyday wear. Considering the already high weight of the shoe, adding more padding looks like a bad idea.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Tongue padding](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-tongue-padding-24583661-main.jpg)\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 7\\.9 mm |\n| Average | 5\\.7 mm |\n\nCompared to 531 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n0\\.4 mm\n\nTongue padding\n\n14\\.2 mm\n\n### Tongue: gusset type\nThe tongue is not gusseted to the sides, which feels disappointing for a shoe at this price point. It is a tough pill to swallow.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Tongue: gusset type](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-tongue-gusset-type-24583657-main.jpg)\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | None |\n\n### Heel tab\nThe heel collar curves inward with plush padding, delivering secure ankle lockdown while skipping the a finger loop tab.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Heel tab](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-heel-tab-24583664-main.jpg)\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | None |\n\n### Price\nThe Plus label in the Structure name does not bring encouraging news for the price, just as we saw with the [Pegasus Plus](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/nike-pegasus-plus). Consequently, the cost can feel quite steep given its performance and relatively muted ride.\n\nHowever, it can be a worthwhile upgrade for runners seeking the next step beyond the regular Structure, as it introduces an approach to stability that Nike has not offered before with the use of ZoomX foam. And the fact that the shoe also works so easily as a sneaker helps with the high price too.\n\nTest results\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | C\\$290 |\n\nCompared to 534 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n\\$60\n\nPrice\n\n\\$300\n\n## Lab test results\n| Lab test | Nike Structure Plus | Average |\n|---|---|---|\n| Cushioning |   |   |\n| Shock absorption heel | 140 SA | 130 SA |\n| Energy return heel | 58\\.2% | 58\\.6% |\n| Heel stack | 40\\.9 mm | 35\\.0 mm |\n| Forefoot stack | 29\\.7 mm | 26\\.4 mm |\n| Drop | 11\\.2 mm | 8\\.6 mm |\n| Midsole softness (new method) | 29\\.5 AC | 36\\.1 AC |\n| Secondary foam softness (new method) | 37\\.7 AC | 39\\.4 AC |\n| Size and fit |   |   |\n| Size | True to size | True to size |\n| Internal length | 272\\.9 mm | 269\\.5 mm |\n| Width \/ Fit (new method) | 93\\.4 mm | 95\\.2 mm |\n| Toebox width (new method) | 72\\.5 mm | 73\\.3 mm |\n| Toebox height | 26\\.0 mm | 27\\.0 mm |\n| Traction \/ Grip |   |   |\n| Forefoot traction | 0\\.51 | 0\\.50 |\n| Flexibility \/ Stiffness |   |   |\n| Flexibility \/ Stiffness (new method) | 19\\.3N | 15\\.5N |\n| Weight |   |   |\n| Weight | 10\\.3 oz (292g) | 9\\.3 oz (264g) |\n| Breathability |   |   |\n| Breathability | 4 | 3\\.6 |\n| Stability |   |   |\n| Torsional rigidity (old method) | 4 | 3\\.5 |\n| Heel counter stiffness | 4 | 3 |\n| Midsole width - forefoot | 119\\.4 mm | 114\\.5 mm |\n| Midsole width - heel | 94\\.7 mm | 90\\.7 mm |\n| Durability |   |   |\n| Toebox durability | 2 | 2\\.6 |\n| Heel padding durability | 4 | 3\\.3 |\n| Outsole durability | 0\\.9 mm | 1\\.1 mm |\n| Outsole thickness | 3\\.4 mm | 3\\.2 mm |\n| Misc |   |   |\n| Insole thickness | 4\\.9 mm | 4\\.5 mm |\n| Removable insole | Yes |   |\n| Midsole softness in cold (new method) | 30\\.2 HA | 37\\.1 HA |\n| Midsole softness in cold (%) | 2% | 23% |\n| Reflective elements | Yes |   |\n| Tongue padding | 7\\.9 mm | 5\\.7 mm |\n| Tongue: gusset type | None |   |\n| Heel tab | None |   |\n| Price | C\\$290 |   |\n## Specs (brand)\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Terrain: | [Road](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/road-running-shoes) |\n| Arch support: | [Stability](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/stability-running-shoes) |\n| Heel height: | 42 mm |\n| Forefoot height: | 32 mm |\n| Collection: | Nike Structure, [Nike Zoomx](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/nike-zoomx-running-shoes) |\n| Weight: | Men:  10\\.9 oz \/ 309g  \\| Women:  8\\.7 oz \/ 248g |\n| Drop: | 10 mm |\n| Pronation: | [Overpronation](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/overpronation-running-shoes) |\n| Arch type: | [Low arch](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/low-arch-running-shoes) |\n| Use: | Jogging  \\|  [Treadmill](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/treadmill-running-shoes)  \\|  [Walking](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/walking-running-shoes)  \\|  All-day wear |\n| Material: | Mesh  \\|  Reflective |\n| Features: | [Orthotic friendly](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/orthotic-friendly-running-shoes)  \\|  [Cushioned](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/cushioned-running-shoes)  \\|  Removable insole |\n| Strike Pattern: | [Heel strike](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/heel-strike-running-shoes) |\n| Condition: | [Flat feet](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/flat-feet-running-shoes) |\n| Season: | All seasons |\n| BRAND Brand: | [Nike](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/nike-running-shoes) |\n| Type: | [Breathable](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/breathable-running-shoes)  \\|  [Comfortable](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/comfortable-running-shoes)  \\|  [Maximalist](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/maximalist-running-shoes) |\n| Widths available: | Normal, [Wide](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/wide-running-shoes) |\n| Pace: | [Daily running](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/daily-running-running-shoes) |\n| SKUs: | HQ3048001 ,  HQ3048003 ,  HQ3048101 ,  HQ3048400 ,  HQ3048500 ,  HQ3048501 ,  HQ3049100 ,  HQ3049101 ,  HQ3049500 ,  HQ3049502 |\n\n## Compare popularity Interactive\nCompare the popularity of another shoe to Nike Structure Plus:\n\nAuthor\n\n[![Carlos Sánchez](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/images\/experts\/carlos-sanchez.jpg)](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/author\/carlos-sanchez \"Carlos Sánchez\")\n\n[Carlos Sánchez](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/author\/carlos-sanchez)\n\nEach week, Carlos conquers over 100K, navigating through the beaches and trails of Málaga. He’s not just passionate about running—he’s obsessed with the technology behind it, burning through 50 pairs of shoes annually, constantly exploring the latest advancements in modern materials. Recently, he conquered the Six Marathon Majors and recorded sub-3-hour finishes in each of his last 5 marathons.\n\n[All articles and reviews](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/author\/carlos-sanchez)\n\n#### Partnerships\n[Footwear testing \/ Prototype testing](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/footwear-testing-services)\n\n[Lab data for academic use](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/science-use)\n\n[Retailer Data Access (API)](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/retailers)\n\n[Affiliate](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/partnerships)\n\n#### Content\n[Shoe pipeline](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/shoe-pipeline)\n\n[Guides](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/news\/guide)\n\n[Size charts](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/size-charts)\n\n[News](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/news)\n\n#### About\n[About RunRepeat](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/about)\n\n[How we test](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/testing-methodology)\n\n[Legal disclaimer](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/legal-disclaimer)\n\n[Privacy policy](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/privacy-policy)\n\n[Sitemap](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/sitemap)\n\n[English](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/nike-structure-plus) \\| [Español](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/es\/nike-structure-plus)\n\nCopyright © 2026  [RunRepeat.com](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/)","attrs_readable_markdown":"Who should buy\n\nIn our opinion, the Nike Structure Plus is a compelling option for:\n\n- Runners loyal to Nike who want the brand’s most advanced stability trainer so far.\n- Those who prefer stability shoes with a classic geometry instead of aggressive rocker designs.\n- Anyone looking for a daily trainer that blends sneaker-style looks with amazing support.\n- Long-time Structure fans who want a step up in tech and comfort. The added ZoomX layer and new upper bring a more premium feel compared to previous versions.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-24583667-main.jpg)\n\nWho should NOT buy\n\nThe main drawback of the Nike Structure Plus is its high price. In our view, many runners will struggle to justify that cost for simple daily mileage. We think beginners especially may hesitate too, particularly when more affordable options like the [Nike Structure 26](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/nike-structure-26) or the [ASICS GT 2000 14](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/asics-gt-2000-14) deliver reliable support and similar versatility.\n\nYour browser does not support the video tag.\n\nWe also believe the shoe’s weight hurts its overall experience. During our runs it felt noticeably bottom-heavy and far from a fast-paced trainer when pushing the pace. From our perspective, lighter stability options like the [Saucony Tempus 2](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/saucony-tempus-2) or the [HOKA Arahi 8](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/hoka-arahi-8) offer a more agile feel and can even handle some tempo sessions.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus parts](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-parts-24583669-main.jpg)\n\nCushioning\n\nShock absorption\n\nThe midsole of the Structure Plus is clearly thick, so we expected above-average results in our shock absorption test. After completing all procedures, we measured 140 SA in the heel and 110 SA in the forefoot, which is solid for everyday runs but not especially impressive.\n\nHowever, for runners seeking a bit more cushioning than the regular Structure 26 (132 SA \/ 99 SA), Nike delivers.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Shock absorption heel](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-shock-absorption-heel-24583638-main.jpg)\n\nHeel\n\nForefoot\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 140 SA |\n| Average | 130 SA |\n\nCompared to 341 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n52 SA\n\nShock absorption\n\n173 SA\n\nEnergy return\n\nThe ZoomX logo looked promising, yet during our runs the shoe felt far from pogo-stick bouncy, if anything the opposite. Indeed, our lab results confirmed this impression, showing just 58.2% energy return in the heel and 65.2% in the forefoot.\n\nThe forefoot contains more ZoomX relative to ReactX, so the difference between both measurements makes sense. Consequently, with these numbers the shoe will feel a tiny bit energetic but only for midfoot and forefoot strikers.\n\nHeel\n\nForefoot\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 58\\.2% |\n| Average | 58\\.6% |\n\nCompared to 338 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n38\\.0%\n\nEnergy return\n\n83\\.0%\n\nHeel stack\n\nAt 40.9 mm, Nike went fully maximalist with the Structure Plus, and that is exactly how the shoe feels underfoot. As soon as we started running in it, we immediately noticed how elevated our feet sit above the ground.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Side](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-side-24583679-main.jpg)\n\nHowever, do not be misled by the massive sidewalls that Nike designed to help prevent the arch from collapsing. The platform is tall, but not *that* tall.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Heel stack](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-heel-stack-24583644-main.jpg)\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 40\\.9 mm |\n| Average | 35\\.0 mm |\n\nCompared to 533 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n22\\.5 mm\n\nHeel stack\n\n48\\.1 mm\n\nForefoot stack\n\nThe forefoot rises 29.7 mm from the ground, offering plenty of foam for easy runs and delivering the solid cushioning as we observed earlier in our shock absorption test.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Forefoot stack](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-forefoot-stack-24583643-main.jpg)\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 29\\.7 mm |\n| Average | 26\\.4 mm |\n\nCompared to 533 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n13\\.7 mm\n\nForefoot stack\n\n38\\.5 mm\n\nDrop\n\nMost runners are used to Nike deploying a high drop in its [daily running shoes](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/daily-running-running-shoes), and we found that the Structure Plus follows that same steep geometry. With 11.2 mm of actual heel-to-toe drop, it's clear to us that rearfoot strikers will feel right at home in this shoe.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Drop](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-drop-24583646-main.jpg)\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 11\\.2 mm |\n| Average | 8\\.6 mm |\n\nCompared to 533 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n\\-0.1 mm\n\nDrop\n\n16\\.1 mm\n\n### Midsole softness\nUpdated\n\nNote: Low measurement: softer. High measurement: firmer.\n\nThe ZoomX logo is not as impressive today as it once was. Nike has adjusted the formula using a TPE foam instead of Pebax for training shoes, and many other brands now use premium foams in their trainers.\n\nYour browser does not support the video tag.\n\nHowever, after testing the shoe ourselves we still found that this version of ZoomX performs well for the Structure Plus, delivering a plush and forgiving ride underfoot. Our Asker C durometer measured 29.5 AC for the top layer, which is clearly softer than the average.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Midsole softness](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-midsole-softness-24583642-main.jpg)\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 29\\.5 AC |\n| Average | 36\\.1 AC |\n\nCompared to 191 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n19\\.6 AC\n\nMidsole softness (soft to firm)\n\n54\\.0 AC\n\n### Secondary foam\nUpdated\n\nNote: Low measurement: softer. High measurement: firmer.\n\nThe dual-foam design of the Nike Structure Plus places ReactX beneath ZoomX, and that positioning is no coincidence. ZoomX brings softness and energy return, while ReactX adds stability and durability.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus ReactX](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-react-x-24583671-main.jpg)\n\nHowever, ReactX also makes the ride feel more muted and less lively. In our durometer test it measured 37.7 AC, confirming its firmer nature, which is expected in a stability-focused shoe anyway.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Secondary foam softness](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-secondary-foam-softness-24583640-main.jpg)\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 37\\.7 AC |\n| Average | 39\\.4 AC |\n\nCompared to 82 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n23\\.6 AC\n\nSecondary foam (soft to firm)\n\n64\\.0 AC\n\nRocker\n\nSome brands are moving toward highly rockered designs on every shoe, but Nike avoids that approach with the Structure Plus. In our view, that is a sensible decision for a stability daily trainer.\n\nThis design makes the shoe a strong option for runners who prefer a more classic midsole geometry. It also feels more natural when walking or wearing the shoe casually, which seems like something Nike clearly considered when creating this sneaker-friendly design.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Rocker](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-rocker-24583647-main.jpg)\n\nSize and fit\n\nNike Structure Plus fits **true to size** (29 votes).\n\nSmall\n\nTrue to size\n\nLarge\n\nInternal length\n\nNote: Our testing shows that internal length is not a great measure of fit. But, as many users have requested this specific test, we've decided to add it for those interested.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Internal length](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-internal-length-24583663-main.jpg)\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 272\\.9 mm |\n| Average | 269\\.5 mm |\n\nCompared to 276 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n259\\.5 mm\n\nInternal length\n\n277\\.6 mm\n\nWidth \/ Fit\n\nAs with every shoe we test, we purchased the Nike Structure Plus in US 9 with standard width. It is also worth noting that Nike offers this model in a Wide version, although availability may vary by market.\n\nYour browser does not support the video tag.\n\nThat said, we began taking measurements on our pair. With 93.4 mm in our first reading, it shows a classic Nike fit that likely will not suit wide feet well, though we still needed to complete the rest of our measurements.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Width \/ Fit](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-width-fit-24583660-main.jpg)\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 93\\.4 mm |\n| Average | 95\\.2 mm |\n\nCompared to 288 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n88\\.5 mm\n\nWidth \/ Fit\n\n101\\.4 mm\n\nToebox width\n\nThe second measurement also came in slightly below average at 72.5 mm, though only by a small margin. We consider it a very standard fit, and we believe anyone who has worn Nike shoes before will find the feel familiar on foot.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Toebox width](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-toebox-width-24583662-main.jpg)\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 72\\.5 mm |\n| Average | 73\\.3 mm |\n\nCompared to 288 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n66\\.7 mm\n\nToebox width\n\n82\\.6 mm\n\nToebox height\n\nToebox height follows the same pattern as the previous two measurements, so there are no surprises here.\n\nYour browser does not support the video tag.\n\nAt 26.0 mm, the figure feels reasonable to us, especially since stability shoes often benefit from a slightly snugger fit to help contain lateral forces and improve support.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Toebox height](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-toebox-height-24583659-main.jpg)\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 26\\.0 mm |\n| Average | 27\\.0 mm |\n\nCompared to 288 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n22\\.0 mm\n\nToebox height\n\n34\\.1 mm\n\nTraction \/ Grip\n\nTraction test\n\nOne area that needed improvement from the regular Structure was traction. We previously measured 0.37, and fortunately the Plus version raises that figure to a more acceptable 0.51.\n\nIt is still not impressive, but it now delivers dependable grip, even when running in the rain.\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 0\\.51 |\n| Average | 0\\.50 |\n\nCompared to 332 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n0\\.11\n\nForefoot traction\n\n0\\.89\n\nOutsole design\n\nThe outsole keeps a very similar layout to the Structure 26, preserving most of its design DNA with only small visual tweaks. It combines black \"YC O-LITE\" rubber in the forefoot with bright green \"OG\/RS 002\" high abrasion rubber panels across the midfoot and heel.\n\nThe rearfoot and midfoot rubber provide solid protection, especially because the rubber sits clearly higher than the exposed foam. We also noted a very deep cutout in the center of the heel that helps with foam compression too.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Outsole design](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-outsole-design-24583654-main.jpg)\n\nFlexibility \/ Stiffness\n\nTo enjoy the Nike Structure Plus, you definitely need to be a fan of longitudinally stiff shoes. With 19.3N in our lab test, it quickly becomes a no-go for runners who prefer a more flexible feel underfoot.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Flexibility \/ Stiffness](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-flexibility-stiffness-24583641-main.jpg)\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 19\\.3N |\n| Average | 15\\.5N |\n\nCompared to 335 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n3\\.9N\n\nFlexibility\n\nStiffness\n\n28\\.5N\n\nWeight\n\nThe Nike Structure Plus is only 1% lighter than the Structure 26, coming in at 10.3 oz or 292g. That small reduction hardly changes the experience, and the shoe still sits on the heavier side of the current market.\n\nFor daily mileage it can work, yet during our testing the shoe felt somewhat bottom heavy. In our opinion, this is a missed opportunity for [Nike](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/catalog\/nike-running-shoes) to gain ground against strong rivals like the [ASICS Gel Kayano 32](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/asics-gel-kayano-32).\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Weight](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-weight-24583648-main.jpg)\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 10\\.3 oz (292g) |\n| Average | 9\\.3 oz (264g) |\n\nCompared to 534 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n5\\.3 oz (149g)\n\nWeight\n\n12\\.9 oz (366g)\n\nBreathability\n\nOne thing we all should demand from Nike is amazing materials in the Plus and Premium versions of its daily trainers. In this case, we think the Structure Plus delivers on that expectation.\n\nYour browser does not support the video tag.\n\nThe upper feels noticeably better than the one found in the regular version. It improves breathability to a 4 out of 5 score while maintaining the same comfortable overall feel.\n\nYour browser does not support the video tag.\n\nNike organizes the upper into three clear zones: a well-ventilated forefoot, a very dense heel designed for stability, and a balanced construction through the midfoot area.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus microscope](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-microscope-24583675-main.jpg)\n\nWhen we examined the upper with our digital microscope, the jump in quality became clear. The mesh looks softer and more refined, and the ventilation holes appear well distributed.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus microscope](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-microscope-2-24583676-main.jpg)\n\nHandling the shoe confirms that comfort was a clear priority here. The heel padding is extremely generous, and all the materials feel soft and pleasant to the touch.\n\nYour browser does not support the video tag.\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 4 |\n| Average | 3\\.6 |\n\nCompared to 463 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n1\n\nBreathability\n\n5\n\nStability\n\nLateral stability test\n\nThe Nike Structure Plus continues to use Nike’s Midfoot Support System to help stabilize the ride and limit pronation. It worked well on the regular Structure, and here Nike made it more pronounced to match the higher stack height of this version.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Midfoot Support System](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-midfoot-support-system-24583666-main.jpg)\n\nThe support feels unobtrusive, and it's a good option for those who overpronate as well as neutral runners seeking a more controlled ride, without the harsh feel of older stability shoes. Oh, and we also really liked how Nike integrated support into the upper in a subtle and visually clean way.\n\nTorsional rigidity\n\nThe Structure Plus has a more flexible structure than many stability shoes, which also makes it more comfortable for everyday wear as a sneaker. We rated it 4\/5.\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 4 |\n| Average | 3\\.5 |\n\nCompared to 512 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n1\n\nTorsional rigidity\n\n5\n\nHeel counter stiffness\n\nThe heel counter also scored 4\/5 instead of the maximum rating, which is uncommon for this type of shoe. We appreciate having an alternative like this in the market, offering solid stability without that overly stiff feel on foot.\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 4 |\n| Average | 3 |\n\nCompared to 496 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n1\n\nHeel counter stiffness\n\n5\n\nMidsole width - forefoot\n\nThe midsole width follows the same pattern we saw in previous tests, showing a moderate rather than extreme design.\n\nYour browser does not support the video tag.\n\nWe measured 119.4 mm, which is clearly wider than a neutral trainer but still narrower than some max-stack stability options.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Midsole width - forefoot](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-midsole-width-forefoot-24583655-main.jpg)\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 119\\.4 mm |\n| Average | 114\\.5 mm |\n\nCompared to 534 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n102\\.2 mm\n\nMidsole width - forefoot\n\n127\\.9 mm\n\nMidsole width - heel\n\nMoving our calipers to the heel, we measured 94.7 mm. Once again, this reflects what we consistently observed in this shoe, a less aggressive and more beginner-friendly approach to stability.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Midsole width - heel](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-midsole-width-heel-24583658-main.jpg)\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 94\\.7 mm |\n| Average | 90\\.7 mm |\n\nCompared to 534 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n70\\.8 mm\n\nMidsole width - heel\n\n106\\.6 mm\n\nDurability\n\nToebox durability\n\nAfter evaluating the breathability of the Structure Plus, we moved to the durability section of our lab to see how the upper holds up under stress. Ventilated uppers like this often struggle here, and this one followed that pattern with a modest 2\/5 result.\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 2 |\n| Average | 2\\.6 |\n\nCompared to 397 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n1\n\nToebox durability\n\n5\n\nHeel padding durability\n\nFortunately, the super-plush heel padding performed much better in our test. This time it earned a solid 4 out of 5.\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 4 |\n| Average | 3\\.3 |\n\nCompared to 391 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n1\n\nHeel padding durability\n\n5\n\nOutsole durability\n\nNike has rarely been a market leader in outsole grip or durability when relying on its own compounds... and yes, Vibram-equipped trail models like the [Ultrafly](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/nike-ultrafly) do not count here. With the Structure Plus, however, we were satisfied, as our test showed solid durability with only 0.9 mm of rubber worn away.\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 0\\.9 mm |\n| Average | 1\\.1 mm |\n\nCompared to 375 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n0\\.0 mm\n\nOutsole wear\n\n2\\.0 mm\n\nOutsole thickness\n\nThe outsole also offers a generous thickness of 3.4 mm. Combined with the durability result we observed, we believe runners can feel confident about the long-term wear of the shoe.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Outsole thickness](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-outsole-thickness-24583645-main.jpg)\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 3\\.4 mm |\n| Average | 3\\.2 mm |\n\nCompared to 530 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n0\\.5 mm\n\nOutsole thickness\n\n6\\.1 mm\n\nMisc\n\nInsole thickness\n\nThe insole is quite basic, made from EVA foam, and adds 4.9 mm of cushioning to the Structure Plus.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Insole thickness](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-insole-thickness-24583665-main.jpg)\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 4\\.9 mm |\n| Average | 4\\.5 mm |\n\nCompared to 528 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n1\\.5 mm\n\nInsole thickness\n\n7\\.8 mm\n\nRemovable insole\n\nRemoving the insole from the Structure Plus is quick and easy. And yes, we know it is a road shoe, thanks Nike\\!\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Removable insole](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-removable-insole-24583656-main.jpg)\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | Yes |\n\nMidsole softness in cold (%)\n\nRunners planning to use the Structure Plus in very cold weather will appreciate this lab result. It became only 2% firmer after spending 20 minutes in our freezer.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Midsole softness in cold (%)](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-midsole-softness-in-cold-24583681-main.jpg)\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 2% |\n| Average | 23% |\n\nCompared to 458 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n0%\n\nMidsole softness in cold\n\n63%\n\nReflective elements\n\nNike includes reflective elements on the heel, but we did not find them particularly impressive. If anything, they felt rather underwhelming.\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | Yes |\n\nTongue padding\n\nWe noticed that Nike slightly updated the lacing system compared to the regular Structure, yet the overall fit feels very similar. The laces also pass twice under a central tongue loop, helping reduce unwanted tongue movement during runs.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus laces](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-laces-24583680-main.jpg)\n\nThe step-in feel is comfortable thanks to a thick tongue with 7.9 mm of padding, which feels more than sufficient for running and everyday wear. Considering the already high weight of the shoe, adding more padding looks like a bad idea.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Tongue padding](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-tongue-padding-24583661-main.jpg)\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | 7\\.9 mm |\n| Average | 5\\.7 mm |\n\nCompared to 531 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n0\\.4 mm\n\nTongue padding\n\n14\\.2 mm\n\nTongue: gusset type\n\nThe tongue is not gusseted to the sides, which feels disappointing for a shoe at this price point. It is a tough pill to swallow.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Tongue: gusset type](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-tongue-gusset-type-24583657-main.jpg)\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | None |\n\nHeel tab\n\nThe heel collar curves inward with plush padding, delivering secure ankle lockdown while skipping the a finger loop tab.\n\n![Nike Structure Plus Heel tab](https:\/\/cdn.runrepeat.com\/storage\/gallery\/product_content\/41077\/nike-structure-plus-heel-tab-24583664-main.jpg)\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | None |\n\nPrice\n\nThe Plus label in the Structure name does not bring encouraging news for the price, just as we saw with the [Pegasus Plus](https:\/\/runrepeat.com\/nike-pegasus-plus). Consequently, the cost can feel quite steep given its performance and relatively muted ride.\n\nHowever, it can be a worthwhile upgrade for runners seeking the next step beyond the regular Structure, as it introduces an approach to stability that Nike has not offered before with the use of ZoomX foam. And the fact that the shoe also works so easily as a sneaker helps with the high price too.\n\n|   |   |\n|---|---|\n| Structure Plus | C\\$290 |\n\nCompared to 534 running shoes\n\nNumber of shoes\n\n\\$60\n\nPrice\n\n\\$300","meta_canonical":null}

3. Robots.txt Check

Query:

Response:

4. Spam/Ban Check

Query:

Response:

5. Seen Status Check

ℹ️ Skipped - page is already crawled

📄

INDEXABLE

✅

CRAWLED

4 days ago

🤖

ROBOTS ALLOWED

Page Info Filters

Filter	Status	Condition	Details
HTTP status	PASS	`download_http_code = 200`	HTTP 200
Age cutoff	PASS	`download_stamp > now() - 6 MONTH`	0.1 months ago
History drop	PASS	`isNull(history_drop_reason)`	No drop reason
Spam/ban	PASS	`fh_dont_index != 1 AND ml_spam_score = 0`	ml_spam_score=0
Canonical	PASS	`meta_canonical IS NULL OR = '' OR = src_unparsed`	Not set

Page Details

Property	Value
URL	https://runrepeat.com/nike-structure-plus
Last Crawled	2026-04-05 18:54:06 (4 days ago)
First Indexed	2026-03-10 03:38:03 (1 month ago)
HTTP Status Code	200
Meta Title	Cut in half: Nike Structure Plus Review (2026) \| RunRepeat
Meta Description	Nike Structure Plus review: The Nike Structure Plus delivers a very unusual mix, combining a stability-focused platform with a street-ready design and a ZoomX layer of foam. Based on our lab tests and running sessions, we found it dependable for easy runs and very comfortable for everyday wear. The midsole feels soft and protective, which we really appreciated during relaxed miles. However, the ride feels muted for a ZoomX shoe, and the heavier build together with the premium price makes it less appealing for runners seeking a more versatile daily trainer.
Meta Canonical	null
Boilerpipe Text	Who should buy In our opinion, the Nike Structure Plus is a compelling option for: Runners loyal to Nike who want the brand’s most advanced stability trainer so far. Those who prefer stability shoes with a classic geometry instead of aggressive rocker designs. Anyone looking for a daily trainer that blends sneaker-style looks with amazing support. Long-time Structure fans who want a step up in tech and comfort. The added ZoomX layer and new upper bring a more premium feel compared to previous versions. Who should NOT buy The main drawback of the Nike Structure Plus is its high price. In our view, many runners will struggle to justify that cost for simple daily mileage. We think beginners especially may hesitate too, particularly when more affordable options like the Nike Structure 26 or the ASICS GT 2000 14 deliver reliable support and similar versatility. Your browser does not support the video tag. We also believe the shoe’s weight hurts its overall experience. During our runs it felt noticeably bottom-heavy and far from a fast-paced trainer when pushing the pace. From our perspective, lighter stability options like the Saucony Tempus 2 or the HOKA Arahi 8 offer a more agile feel and can even handle some tempo sessions. Cushioning Shock absorption The midsole of the Structure Plus is clearly thick, so we expected above-average results in our shock absorption test. After completing all procedures, we measured 140 SA in the heel and 110 SA in the forefoot, which is solid for everyday runs but not especially impressive. However, for runners seeking a bit more cushioning than the regular Structure 26 (132 SA / 99 SA), Nike delivers. Heel Forefoot Structure Plus 140 SA Average 130 SA Compared to 341 running shoes Number of shoes 52 SA Shock absorption 173 SA Energy return The ZoomX logo looked promising, yet during our runs the shoe felt far from pogo-stick bouncy, if anything the opposite. Indeed, our lab results confirmed this impression, showing just 58.2% energy return in the heel and 65.2% in the forefoot. The forefoot contains more ZoomX relative to ReactX, so the difference between both measurements makes sense. Consequently, with these numbers the shoe will feel a tiny bit energetic but only for midfoot and forefoot strikers. Heel Forefoot Structure Plus 58.2% Average 58.6% Compared to 338 running shoes Number of shoes 38.0% Energy return 83.0% Heel stack At 40.9 mm, Nike went fully maximalist with the Structure Plus, and that is exactly how the shoe feels underfoot. As soon as we started running in it, we immediately noticed how elevated our feet sit above the ground. However, do not be misled by the massive sidewalls that Nike designed to help prevent the arch from collapsing. The platform is tall, but not that tall. Structure Plus 40.9 mm Average 35.0 mm Compared to 533 running shoes Number of shoes 22.5 mm Heel stack 48.1 mm Forefoot stack The forefoot rises 29.7 mm from the ground, offering plenty of foam for easy runs and delivering the solid cushioning as we observed earlier in our shock absorption test. Structure Plus 29.7 mm Average 26.4 mm Compared to 533 running shoes Number of shoes 13.7 mm Forefoot stack 38.5 mm Drop Most runners are used to Nike deploying a high drop in its daily running shoes , and we found that the Structure Plus follows that same steep geometry. With 11.2 mm of actual heel-to-toe drop, it's clear to us that rearfoot strikers will feel right at home in this shoe. Structure Plus 11.2 mm Average 8.6 mm Compared to 533 running shoes Number of shoes -0.1 mm Drop 16.1 mm Midsole softness Updated Note: Low measurement: softer. High measurement: firmer. The ZoomX logo is not as impressive today as it once was. Nike has adjusted the formula using a TPE foam instead of Pebax for training shoes, and many other brands now use premium foams in their trainers. Your browser does not support the video tag. However, after testing the shoe ourselves we still found that this version of ZoomX performs well for the Structure Plus, delivering a plush and forgiving ride underfoot. Our Asker C durometer measured 29.5 AC for the top layer, which is clearly softer than the average. Structure Plus 29.5 AC Average 36.1 AC Compared to 191 running shoes Number of shoes 19.6 AC Midsole softness (soft to firm) 54.0 AC Secondary foam Updated Note: Low measurement: softer. High measurement: firmer. The dual-foam design of the Nike Structure Plus places ReactX beneath ZoomX, and that positioning is no coincidence. ZoomX brings softness and energy return, while ReactX adds stability and durability. However, ReactX also makes the ride feel more muted and less lively. In our durometer test it measured 37.7 AC, confirming its firmer nature, which is expected in a stability-focused shoe anyway. Structure Plus 37.7 AC Average 39.4 AC Compared to 82 running shoes Number of shoes 23.6 AC Secondary foam (soft to firm) 64.0 AC Rocker Some brands are moving toward highly rockered designs on every shoe, but Nike avoids that approach with the Structure Plus. In our view, that is a sensible decision for a stability daily trainer. This design makes the shoe a strong option for runners who prefer a more classic midsole geometry. It also feels more natural when walking or wearing the shoe casually, which seems like something Nike clearly considered when creating this sneaker-friendly design. Size and fit Nike Structure Plus fits true to size (29 votes). Small True to size Large Internal length Note: Our testing shows that internal length is not a great measure of fit. But, as many users have requested this specific test, we've decided to add it for those interested. Structure Plus 272.9 mm Average 269.5 mm Compared to 276 running shoes Number of shoes 259.5 mm Internal length 277.6 mm Width / Fit As with every shoe we test, we purchased the Nike Structure Plus in US 9 with standard width. It is also worth noting that Nike offers this model in a Wide version, although availability may vary by market. Your browser does not support the video tag. That said, we began taking measurements on our pair. With 93.4 mm in our first reading, it shows a classic Nike fit that likely will not suit wide feet well, though we still needed to complete the rest of our measurements. Structure Plus 93.4 mm Average 95.2 mm Compared to 288 running shoes Number of shoes 88.5 mm Width / Fit 101.4 mm Toebox width The second measurement also came in slightly below average at 72.5 mm, though only by a small margin. We consider it a very standard fit, and we believe anyone who has worn Nike shoes before will find the feel familiar on foot. Structure Plus 72.5 mm Average 73.3 mm Compared to 288 running shoes Number of shoes 66.7 mm Toebox width 82.6 mm Toebox height Toebox height follows the same pattern as the previous two measurements, so there are no surprises here. Your browser does not support the video tag. At 26.0 mm, the figure feels reasonable to us, especially since stability shoes often benefit from a slightly snugger fit to help contain lateral forces and improve support. Structure Plus 26.0 mm Average 27.0 mm Compared to 288 running shoes Number of shoes 22.0 mm Toebox height 34.1 mm Traction / Grip Traction test One area that needed improvement from the regular Structure was traction. We previously measured 0.37, and fortunately the Plus version raises that figure to a more acceptable 0.51. It is still not impressive, but it now delivers dependable grip, even when running in the rain. Structure Plus 0.51 Average 0.50 Compared to 332 running shoes Number of shoes 0.11 Forefoot traction 0.89 Outsole design The outsole keeps a very similar layout to the Structure 26, preserving most of its design DNA with only small visual tweaks. It combines black "YC O-LITE" rubber in the forefoot with bright green "OG/RS 002" high abrasion rubber panels across the midfoot and heel. The rearfoot and midfoot rubber provide solid protection, especially because the rubber sits clearly higher than the exposed foam. We also noted a very deep cutout in the center of the heel that helps with foam compression too. Flexibility / Stiffness To enjoy the Nike Structure Plus, you definitely need to be a fan of longitudinally stiff shoes. With 19.3N in our lab test, it quickly becomes a no-go for runners who prefer a more flexible feel underfoot. Structure Plus 19.3N Average 15.5N Compared to 335 running shoes Number of shoes 3.9N Flexibility Stiffness 28.5N Weight The Nike Structure Plus is only 1% lighter than the Structure 26, coming in at 10.3 oz or 292g. That small reduction hardly changes the experience, and the shoe still sits on the heavier side of the current market. For daily mileage it can work, yet during our testing the shoe felt somewhat bottom heavy. In our opinion, this is a missed opportunity for Nike to gain ground against strong rivals like the ASICS Gel Kayano 32 . Structure Plus 10.3 oz (292g) Average 9.3 oz (264g) Compared to 534 running shoes Number of shoes 5.3 oz (149g) Weight 12.9 oz (366g) Breathability One thing we all should demand from Nike is amazing materials in the Plus and Premium versions of its daily trainers. In this case, we think the Structure Plus delivers on that expectation. Your browser does not support the video tag. The upper feels noticeably better than the one found in the regular version. It improves breathability to a 4 out of 5 score while maintaining the same comfortable overall feel. Your browser does not support the video tag. Nike organizes the upper into three clear zones: a well-ventilated forefoot, a very dense heel designed for stability, and a balanced construction through the midfoot area. When we examined the upper with our digital microscope, the jump in quality became clear. The mesh looks softer and more refined, and the ventilation holes appear well distributed. Handling the shoe confirms that comfort was a clear priority here. The heel padding is extremely generous, and all the materials feel soft and pleasant to the touch. Your browser does not support the video tag. Structure Plus 4 Average 3.6 Compared to 463 running shoes Number of shoes 1 Breathability 5 Stability Lateral stability test The Nike Structure Plus continues to use Nike’s Midfoot Support System to help stabilize the ride and limit pronation. It worked well on the regular Structure, and here Nike made it more pronounced to match the higher stack height of this version. The support feels unobtrusive, and it's a good option for those who overpronate as well as neutral runners seeking a more controlled ride, without the harsh feel of older stability shoes. Oh, and we also really liked how Nike integrated support into the upper in a subtle and visually clean way. Torsional rigidity The Structure Plus has a more flexible structure than many stability shoes, which also makes it more comfortable for everyday wear as a sneaker. We rated it 4/5. Structure Plus 4 Average 3.5 Compared to 512 running shoes Number of shoes 1 Torsional rigidity 5 Heel counter stiffness The heel counter also scored 4/5 instead of the maximum rating, which is uncommon for this type of shoe. We appreciate having an alternative like this in the market, offering solid stability without that overly stiff feel on foot. Structure Plus 4 Average 3 Compared to 496 running shoes Number of shoes 1 Heel counter stiffness 5 Midsole width - forefoot The midsole width follows the same pattern we saw in previous tests, showing a moderate rather than extreme design. Your browser does not support the video tag. We measured 119.4 mm, which is clearly wider than a neutral trainer but still narrower than some max-stack stability options. Structure Plus 119.4 mm Average 114.5 mm Compared to 534 running shoes Number of shoes 102.2 mm Midsole width - forefoot 127.9 mm Midsole width - heel Moving our calipers to the heel, we measured 94.7 mm. Once again, this reflects what we consistently observed in this shoe, a less aggressive and more beginner-friendly approach to stability. Structure Plus 94.7 mm Average 90.7 mm Compared to 534 running shoes Number of shoes 70.8 mm Midsole width - heel 106.6 mm Durability Toebox durability After evaluating the breathability of the Structure Plus, we moved to the durability section of our lab to see how the upper holds up under stress. Ventilated uppers like this often struggle here, and this one followed that pattern with a modest 2/5 result. Structure Plus 2 Average 2.6 Compared to 397 running shoes Number of shoes 1 Toebox durability 5 Heel padding durability Fortunately, the super-plush heel padding performed much better in our test. This time it earned a solid 4 out of 5. Structure Plus 4 Average 3.3 Compared to 391 running shoes Number of shoes 1 Heel padding durability 5 Outsole durability Nike has rarely been a market leader in outsole grip or durability when relying on its own compounds... and yes, Vibram-equipped trail models like the Ultrafly do not count here. With the Structure Plus, however, we were satisfied, as our test showed solid durability with only 0.9 mm of rubber worn away. Structure Plus 0.9 mm Average 1.1 mm Compared to 375 running shoes Number of shoes 0.0 mm Outsole wear 2.0 mm Outsole thickness The outsole also offers a generous thickness of 3.4 mm. Combined with the durability result we observed, we believe runners can feel confident about the long-term wear of the shoe. Structure Plus 3.4 mm Average 3.2 mm Compared to 530 running shoes Number of shoes 0.5 mm Outsole thickness 6.1 mm Misc Insole thickness The insole is quite basic, made from EVA foam, and adds 4.9 mm of cushioning to the Structure Plus. Structure Plus 4.9 mm Average 4.5 mm Compared to 528 running shoes Number of shoes 1.5 mm Insole thickness 7.8 mm Removable insole Removing the insole from the Structure Plus is quick and easy. And yes, we know it is a road shoe, thanks Nike! Structure Plus Yes Midsole softness in cold (%) Runners planning to use the Structure Plus in very cold weather will appreciate this lab result. It became only 2% firmer after spending 20 minutes in our freezer. Structure Plus 2% Average 23% Compared to 458 running shoes Number of shoes 0% Midsole softness in cold 63% Reflective elements Nike includes reflective elements on the heel, but we did not find them particularly impressive. If anything, they felt rather underwhelming. Structure Plus Yes Tongue padding We noticed that Nike slightly updated the lacing system compared to the regular Structure, yet the overall fit feels very similar. The laces also pass twice under a central tongue loop, helping reduce unwanted tongue movement during runs. The step-in feel is comfortable thanks to a thick tongue with 7.9 mm of padding, which feels more than sufficient for running and everyday wear. Considering the already high weight of the shoe, adding more padding looks like a bad idea. Structure Plus 7.9 mm Average 5.7 mm Compared to 531 running shoes Number of shoes 0.4 mm Tongue padding 14.2 mm Tongue: gusset type The tongue is not gusseted to the sides, which feels disappointing for a shoe at this price point. It is a tough pill to swallow. Structure Plus None Heel tab The heel collar curves inward with plush padding, delivering secure ankle lockdown while skipping the a finger loop tab. Structure Plus None Price The Plus label in the Structure name does not bring encouraging news for the price, just as we saw with the Pegasus Plus . Consequently, the cost can feel quite steep given its performance and relatively muted ride. However, it can be a worthwhile upgrade for runners seeking the next step beyond the regular Structure, as it introduces an approach to stability that Nike has not offered before with the use of ZoomX foam. And the fact that the shoe also works so easily as a sneaker helps with the high price too. Structure Plus C$290 Compared to 534 running shoes Number of shoes $60 Price $300
Markdown	[Hiring remote: Content writer / review specialist in](https://runrepeat.com/hiring) - Reviews - - Back - [Running](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/running-shoes) - [Hiking](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/hiking-footwear) - [Track and XC](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/track-spikes-and-xc) - [Walking](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/walking-shoes) - - [Training](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/training-shoes) - [Tennis](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/tennis-shoes) - [Basketball](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/basketball-shoes) - [Sneakers](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/sneakers) - [Buying guides](https://runrepeat.com/guides) - Deals - - Back - [Running](https://runrepeat.com/deals/running-shoes) - [Hiking boots](https://runrepeat.com/deals/hiking-boots) - [Hiking shoes](https://runrepeat.com/deals/hiking-shoes) - [Hiking sandals](https://runrepeat.com/deals/hiking-sandals) - [Track spikes](https://runrepeat.com/deals/track-spikes) - [Cross country](https://runrepeat.com/deals/cross-country-shoes) - - [Walking](https://runrepeat.com/deals/walking-shoes) - [Training](https://runrepeat.com/deals/training-shoes) - [Tennis](https://runrepeat.com/deals/tennis-shoes) - [Basketball](https://runrepeat.com/deals/basketball-shoes) - [Sneakers](https://runrepeat.com/deals/sneakers) - [Running shoes](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/running-shoes) - [Nike](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/nike-running-shoes) - Nike Structure Plus # Nike Structure Plus review New [![Carlos Sánchez](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/images/experts/carlos-sanchez-sm.jpg)](https://runrepeat.com/author/carlos-sanchez "Carlos Sánchez") [Carlos Sánchez](https://runrepeat.com/author/carlos-sanchez) on Mar 9, 2026 \\| Reviewed using [methodology 2.2](https://runrepeat.com/testing-methodology) ![Nike Structure Plus](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_primary/41077/nike-structure-plus-24583634-main.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_primary/41077/nike-structure-plus-24583634-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-24583667-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus parts](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-parts-24583669-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus cut](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-cut-24583668-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Shock absorption heel](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-shock-absorption-heel-24583638-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Energy return heel](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-energy-return-heel-24583635-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Side](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-side-24583679-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Heel stack](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-heel-stack-24583644-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Forefoot stack](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-forefoot-stack-24583643-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Drop](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-drop-24583646-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus ZoomX Foam](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-zoom-x-foam-24583670-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Midsole softness](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-midsole-softness-24583642-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus ReactX](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-react-x-24583671-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Secondary foam softness](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-secondary-foam-softness-24583640-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Rocker](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-rocker-24583647-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Internal length](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-internal-length-24583663-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Gel](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-gel-24583672-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Width / Fit](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-width-fit-24583660-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Toebox width](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-toebox-width-24583662-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus toes](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-toes-24589581-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Toebox height](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-toebox-height-24583659-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Forefoot traction](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-forefoot-traction-24583652-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Outsole design](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-outsole-design-24583654-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Flexibility / Stiffness](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-flexibility-stiffness-24583641-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Weight](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-weight-24583648-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus microscope](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-microscope-24583675-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus smoke](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-smoke-24583673-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Light](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-light-24583674-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus microscope](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-microscope-2-24583676-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus upper](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-upper-24583677-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Midfoot Support System](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-midfoot-support-system-24583666-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Lateral stability test](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-lateral-stability-test-24583650-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Torsional rigidity](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-torsional-rigidity-24583651-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Heel counter stiffness](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-heel-counter-stiffness-24583649-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus run](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-run-24583678-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Midsole width - forefoot](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-midsole-width-forefoot-24583655-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Midsole width - heel](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-midsole-width-heel-24583658-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Toebox durability](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-toebox-durability-24583639-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Heel padding durability](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-heel-padding-durability-24583636-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Outsole durability](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-outsole-durability-24583637-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Outsole thickness](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-outsole-thickness-24583645-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Insole thickness](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-insole-thickness-24583665-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Removable insole](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-removable-insole-24583656-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Midsole softness in cold (%)](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-midsole-softness-in-cold-24583681-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Reflective elements](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-reflective-elements-24583653-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus laces](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-laces-24583680-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Tongue padding](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-tongue-padding-24583661-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Tongue: gusset type](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-tongue-gusset-type-24583657-120.jpg) ![Nike Structure Plus Heel tab](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-heel-tab-24583664-120.jpg) ## Our verdict The Nike Structure Plus delivers a very unusual mix, combining a stability-focused platform with a street-ready design and a ZoomX layer of foam. Based on our lab tests and running sessions, we found it dependable for easy runs and very comfortable for everyday wear. The midsole feels soft and protective, which we really appreciated during relaxed miles. However, the ride feels muted for a ZoomX shoe, and the heavier build together with the premium price makes it less appealing for runners seeking a more versatile daily trainer. - Top pick in [best long distance Nike running shoes](https://runrepeat.com/guides/best-nike-long-distance-running-shoes) - Top pick in [best Nike road running shoes](https://runrepeat.com/guides/best-nike-road-running-shoes) ### Pros - Finally some plush ZoomX in the Structure - Good shock absorption - Doubles as a sneaker and looks super cool - HIgh drop suits heel strikers - Improved traction - Premium upper with solid ventilation - Durable outsole - Smooth, non-intrusive stability system - Excellent step-in comfort ### Cons - Heavy - Still feels muted despite ZoomX - Non-gusseted tongue ### Audience verdict 90 Superb\! - Top 10% in [road running shoes](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/road-running-shoes) - Top 13% in [Nike running shoes](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/nike-running-shoes) - Top 14% most popular running shoes ## Comparison The most similar running shoes compared Words (e.g. "High") Numbers (e.g. "73%") \| \| [![Nike Structure Plus](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_primary/41077/nike-structure-plus-24583634-120.jpg) Nike Structure Plus](https://runrepeat.com/nike-structure-plus) \| [![Nike Structure 26](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_primary/40934/nike-structure-26-23498208-120.jpg) Nike Structure 26](https://runrepeat.com/nike-structure-26) \| [![Brooks Glycerin GTS 22](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_primary/40659/brooks-glycerin-gts-22-22723084-120.jpg) Brooks Glycerin GTS 22](https://runrepeat.com/brooks-glycerin-gts-22) \| [![New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_primary/40383/new-balance-fresh-foam-x-860-v-14-22110006-120.jpg) New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14](https://runrepeat.com/new-balance-fresh-foam-x-860-v14) \| \+ \+ Add a shoe \| \|---\|---\|---\|---\|---\|---\| \| Audience score \| 90 Superb\! \| 85 Good\! \| 79 Good\! \| 85 Good\! \| \| \| Price \| \$170 \| \$145 \| \$165 \| \$140 \| \| \| Pace \| Daily running \| Daily running \| Daily running \| Daily running \| \| \| Shock absorption \| High \| High \| Moderate \| Moderate \| \| \| Energy return \| Moderate \| Moderate \| Low \| Moderate \| \| \| Traction \| High \| Moderate \| Moderate \| High \| \| \| Arch support \| Stability \| Stability \| Stability \| Stability \| \| \| Weight lab Weight brand \| 10\.3 oz / 292g 10\.9 oz / 309g \| 10\.4 oz / 296g 10\.5 oz / 298g \| 10\.8 oz / 305g 10\.7 oz / 303g \| 10\.4 oz / 295g 10\.5 oz / 298g \| \| \| Drop lab Drop brand \| 11\.2 mm 10\.0 mm \| 10\.1 mm 10\.0 mm \| 10\.1 mm 10\.0 mm \| 9\.3 mm 8\.0 mm \| \| \| Strike pattern \| Heel \| Heel \| Heel \| HeelMid/forefoot \| \| \| Size \| True to size \| Slightly small \| True to size \| Slightly small \| \| \| Midsole softness \| Soft \| Balanced \| Balanced \| Soft \| \| \| Difference in midsole softness in cold \| Small \| Small \| Normal \| Big \| \| \| Toebox durability \| Decent \| Decent \| Decent \| Decent \| \| \| Heel padding durability \| Good \| Good \| Good \| Bad \| \| \| Outsole durability \| Good \| Good \| Good \| Decent \| \| \| Breathability \| Moderate \| Moderate \| Breathable \| Moderate \| \| \| Width / fit \| Medium \| Medium \| Medium \| Medium \| \| \| Toebox width \| Medium \| Medium \| Medium \| Medium \| \| \| Stiffness \| Stiff \| Moderate \| Moderate \| Moderate \| \| \| Torsional rigidity \| Stiff \| Stiff \| Stiff \| Moderate \| \| \| Heel counter stiffness \| Stiff \| Moderate \| Moderate \| Stiff \| \| \| Heel lab Heel brand \| 40\.9 mm 42\.0 mm \| 36\.1 mm 38\.0 mm \| 37\.8 mm 39\.0 mm \| 36\.8 mm 38\.0 mm \| \| \| Forefoot lab Forefoot brand \| 29\.7 mm 32\.0 mm \| 26\.0 mm 28\.0 mm \| 27\.7 mm 29\.0 mm \| 27\.5 mm 30\.0 mm \| \| \| Widths available \| NormalWide \| NormalWideX-Wide \| NormalWideX-Wide \| NarrowNormalWideX-Wide \| \| \| Orthotic friendly \| � \| � \| � \| � \| \| \| Season \| All seasons \| All seasons \| SummerAll seasons \| All seasons \| \| \| Removable insole \| � \| � \| � \| � \| \| \| Ranking \| \#32 Top 9% \| \#251 Bottom 36% \| \#330 Bottom 16% \| \#220 Bottom 44% \| \| \| Popularity \| \#55 Top 14% \| \#49 Top 13% \| \#51 Top 13% \| \#27 Top 7% \| \| See more ## Who should buy In our opinion, the Nike Structure Plus is a compelling option for: - Runners loyal to Nike who want the brand’s most advanced stability trainer so far. - Those who prefer stability shoes with a classic geometry instead of aggressive rocker designs. - Anyone looking for a daily trainer that blends sneaker-style looks with amazing support. - Long-time Structure fans who want a step up in tech and comfort. The added ZoomX layer and new upper bring a more premium feel compared to previous versions. ![Nike Structure Plus](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-24583667-main.jpg) ## Who should NOT buy The main drawback of the Nike Structure Plus is its high price. In our view, many runners will struggle to justify that cost for simple daily mileage. We think beginners especially may hesitate too, particularly when more affordable options like the [Nike Structure 26](https://runrepeat.com/nike-structure-26) or the [ASICS GT 2000 14](https://runrepeat.com/asics-gt-2000-14) deliver reliable support and similar versatility. Your browser does not support the video tag. We also believe the shoe’s weight hurts its overall experience. During our runs it felt noticeably bottom-heavy and far from a fast-paced trainer when pushing the pace. From our perspective, lighter stability options like the [Saucony Tempus 2](https://runrepeat.com/saucony-tempus-2) or the [HOKA Arahi 8](https://runrepeat.com/hoka-arahi-8) offer a more agile feel and can even handle some tempo sessions. ![Nike Structure Plus parts](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-parts-24583669-main.jpg) ## Cushioning ### Shock absorption The midsole of the Structure Plus is clearly thick, so we expected above-average results in our shock absorption test. After completing all procedures, we measured 140 SA in the heel and 110 SA in the forefoot, which is solid for everyday runs but not especially impressive. However, for runners seeking a bit more cushioning than the regular Structure 26 (132 SA / 99 SA), Nike delivers. ![Nike Structure Plus Shock absorption heel](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-shock-absorption-heel-24583638-main.jpg) Heel Forefoot Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 140 SA \| \| Average \| 130 SA \| Compared to 341 running shoes Number of shoes 52 SA Shock absorption 173 SA ### Energy return The ZoomX logo looked promising, yet during our runs the shoe felt far from pogo-stick bouncy, if anything the opposite. Indeed, our lab results confirmed this impression, showing just 58.2% energy return in the heel and 65.2% in the forefoot. The forefoot contains more ZoomX relative to ReactX, so the difference between both measurements makes sense. Consequently, with these numbers the shoe will feel a tiny bit energetic but only for midfoot and forefoot strikers. Heel Forefoot Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 58\.2% \| \| Average \| 58\.6% \| Compared to 338 running shoes Number of shoes 38\.0% Energy return 83\.0% ### Heel stack At 40.9 mm, Nike went fully maximalist with the Structure Plus, and that is exactly how the shoe feels underfoot. As soon as we started running in it, we immediately noticed how elevated our feet sit above the ground. ![Nike Structure Plus Side](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-side-24583679-main.jpg) However, do not be misled by the massive sidewalls that Nike designed to help prevent the arch from collapsing. The platform is tall, but not that tall. ![Nike Structure Plus Heel stack](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-heel-stack-24583644-main.jpg) Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 40\.9 mm \| \| Average \| 35\.0 mm \| Compared to 533 running shoes Number of shoes 22\.5 mm Heel stack 48\.1 mm ### Forefoot stack The forefoot rises 29.7 mm from the ground, offering plenty of foam for easy runs and delivering the solid cushioning as we observed earlier in our shock absorption test. ![Nike Structure Plus Forefoot stack](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-forefoot-stack-24583643-main.jpg) Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 29\.7 mm \| \| Average \| 26\.4 mm \| Compared to 533 running shoes Number of shoes 13\.7 mm Forefoot stack 38\.5 mm ### Drop Most runners are used to Nike deploying a high drop in its [daily running shoes](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/daily-running-running-shoes), and we found that the Structure Plus follows that same steep geometry. With 11.2 mm of actual heel-to-toe drop, it's clear to us that rearfoot strikers will feel right at home in this shoe. ![Nike Structure Plus Drop](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-drop-24583646-main.jpg) Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 11\.2 mm \| \| Average \| 8\.6 mm \| Compared to 533 running shoes Number of shoes \-0.1 mm Drop 16\.1 mm ### Midsole softness Updated Note: Low measurement: softer. High measurement: firmer. The ZoomX logo is not as impressive today as it once was. Nike has adjusted the formula using a TPE foam instead of Pebax for training shoes, and many other brands now use premium foams in their trainers. Your browser does not support the video tag. However, after testing the shoe ourselves we still found that this version of ZoomX performs well for the Structure Plus, delivering a plush and forgiving ride underfoot. Our Asker C durometer measured 29.5 AC for the top layer, which is clearly softer than the average. ![Nike Structure Plus Midsole softness](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-midsole-softness-24583642-main.jpg) Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 29\.5 AC \| \| Average \| 36\.1 AC \| Compared to 191 running shoes Number of shoes 19\.6 AC Midsole softness (soft to firm) 54\.0 AC ### Secondary foam Updated Note: Low measurement: softer. High measurement: firmer. The dual-foam design of the Nike Structure Plus places ReactX beneath ZoomX, and that positioning is no coincidence. ZoomX brings softness and energy return, while ReactX adds stability and durability. ![Nike Structure Plus ReactX](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-react-x-24583671-main.jpg) However, ReactX also makes the ride feel more muted and less lively. In our durometer test it measured 37.7 AC, confirming its firmer nature, which is expected in a stability-focused shoe anyway. ![Nike Structure Plus Secondary foam softness](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-secondary-foam-softness-24583640-main.jpg) Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 37\.7 AC \| \| Average \| 39\.4 AC \| Compared to 82 running shoes Number of shoes 23\.6 AC Secondary foam (soft to firm) 64\.0 AC ### Rocker Some brands are moving toward highly rockered designs on every shoe, but Nike avoids that approach with the Structure Plus. In our view, that is a sensible decision for a stability daily trainer. This design makes the shoe a strong option for runners who prefer a more classic midsole geometry. It also feels more natural when walking or wearing the shoe casually, which seems like something Nike clearly considered when creating this sneaker-friendly design. ![Nike Structure Plus Rocker](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-rocker-24583647-main.jpg) ## Size and fit ### Size Nike Structure Plus fits true to size (29 votes). Small True to size Large ### Internal length Note: Our testing shows that internal length is not a great measure of fit. But, as many users have requested this specific test, we've decided to add it for those interested. ![Nike Structure Plus Internal length](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-internal-length-24583663-main.jpg) Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 272\.9 mm \| \| Average \| 269\.5 mm \| Compared to 276 running shoes Number of shoes 259\.5 mm Internal length 277\.6 mm ### Width / Fit As with every shoe we test, we purchased the Nike Structure Plus in US 9 with standard width. It is also worth noting that Nike offers this model in a Wide version, although availability may vary by market. Your browser does not support the video tag. That said, we began taking measurements on our pair. With 93.4 mm in our first reading, it shows a classic Nike fit that likely will not suit wide feet well, though we still needed to complete the rest of our measurements. ![Nike Structure Plus Width / Fit](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-width-fit-24583660-main.jpg) Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 93\.4 mm \| \| Average \| 95\.2 mm \| Compared to 288 running shoes Number of shoes 88\.5 mm Width / Fit 101\.4 mm ### Toebox width The second measurement also came in slightly below average at 72.5 mm, though only by a small margin. We consider it a very standard fit, and we believe anyone who has worn Nike shoes before will find the feel familiar on foot. ![Nike Structure Plus Toebox width](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-toebox-width-24583662-main.jpg) Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 72\.5 mm \| \| Average \| 73\.3 mm \| Compared to 288 running shoes Number of shoes 66\.7 mm Toebox width 82\.6 mm ### Toebox height Toebox height follows the same pattern as the previous two measurements, so there are no surprises here. Your browser does not support the video tag. At 26.0 mm, the figure feels reasonable to us, especially since stability shoes often benefit from a slightly snugger fit to help contain lateral forces and improve support. ![Nike Structure Plus Toebox height](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-toebox-height-24583659-main.jpg) Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 26\.0 mm \| \| Average \| 27\.0 mm \| Compared to 288 running shoes Number of shoes 22\.0 mm Toebox height 34\.1 mm ## Traction / Grip ### Traction test One area that needed improvement from the regular Structure was traction. We previously measured 0.37, and fortunately the Plus version raises that figure to a more acceptable 0.51. It is still not impressive, but it now delivers dependable grip, even when running in the rain. Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 0\.51 \| \| Average \| 0\.50 \| Compared to 332 running shoes Number of shoes 0\.11 Forefoot traction 0\.89 ### Outsole design The outsole keeps a very similar layout to the Structure 26, preserving most of its design DNA with only small visual tweaks. It combines black "YC O-LITE" rubber in the forefoot with bright green "OG/RS 002" high abrasion rubber panels across the midfoot and heel. The rearfoot and midfoot rubber provide solid protection, especially because the rubber sits clearly higher than the exposed foam. We also noted a very deep cutout in the center of the heel that helps with foam compression too. ![Nike Structure Plus Outsole design](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-outsole-design-24583654-main.jpg) ## Flexibility / Stiffness To enjoy the Nike Structure Plus, you definitely need to be a fan of longitudinally stiff shoes. With 19.3N in our lab test, it quickly becomes a no-go for runners who prefer a more flexible feel underfoot. ![Nike Structure Plus Flexibility / Stiffness](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-flexibility-stiffness-24583641-main.jpg) Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 19\.3N \| \| Average \| 15\.5N \| Compared to 335 running shoes Number of shoes 3\.9N Flexibility Stiffness 28\.5N ## Weight The Nike Structure Plus is only 1% lighter than the Structure 26, coming in at 10.3 oz or 292g. That small reduction hardly changes the experience, and the shoe still sits on the heavier side of the current market. For daily mileage it can work, yet during our testing the shoe felt somewhat bottom heavy. In our opinion, this is a missed opportunity for [Nike](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/nike-running-shoes) to gain ground against strong rivals like the [ASICS Gel Kayano 32](https://runrepeat.com/asics-gel-kayano-32). ![Nike Structure Plus Weight](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-weight-24583648-main.jpg) Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 10\.3 oz (292g) \| \| Average \| 9\.3 oz (264g) \| Compared to 534 running shoes Number of shoes 5\.3 oz (149g) Weight 12\.9 oz (366g) ## Breathability One thing we all should demand from Nike is amazing materials in the Plus and Premium versions of its daily trainers. In this case, we think the Structure Plus delivers on that expectation. Your browser does not support the video tag. The upper feels noticeably better than the one found in the regular version. It improves breathability to a 4 out of 5 score while maintaining the same comfortable overall feel. Your browser does not support the video tag. Nike organizes the upper into three clear zones: a well-ventilated forefoot, a very dense heel designed for stability, and a balanced construction through the midfoot area. ![Nike Structure Plus microscope](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-microscope-24583675-main.jpg) When we examined the upper with our digital microscope, the jump in quality became clear. The mesh looks softer and more refined, and the ventilation holes appear well distributed. ![Nike Structure Plus microscope](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-microscope-2-24583676-main.jpg) Handling the shoe confirms that comfort was a clear priority here. The heel padding is extremely generous, and all the materials feel soft and pleasant to the touch. Your browser does not support the video tag. Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 4 \| \| Average \| 3\.6 \| Compared to 463 running shoes Number of shoes 1 Breathability 5 ## Stability ### Lateral stability test The Nike Structure Plus continues to use Nike’s Midfoot Support System to help stabilize the ride and limit pronation. It worked well on the regular Structure, and here Nike made it more pronounced to match the higher stack height of this version. ![Nike Structure Plus Midfoot Support System](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-midfoot-support-system-24583666-main.jpg) The support feels unobtrusive, and it's a good option for those who overpronate as well as neutral runners seeking a more controlled ride, without the harsh feel of older stability shoes. Oh, and we also really liked how Nike integrated support into the upper in a subtle and visually clean way. ### Torsional rigidity The Structure Plus has a more flexible structure than many stability shoes, which also makes it more comfortable for everyday wear as a sneaker. We rated it 4/5. Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 4 \| \| Average \| 3\.5 \| Compared to 512 running shoes Number of shoes 1 Torsional rigidity 5 ### Heel counter stiffness The heel counter also scored 4/5 instead of the maximum rating, which is uncommon for this type of shoe. We appreciate having an alternative like this in the market, offering solid stability without that overly stiff feel on foot. Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 4 \| \| Average \| 3 \| Compared to 496 running shoes Number of shoes 1 Heel counter stiffness 5 ### Midsole width - forefoot The midsole width follows the same pattern we saw in previous tests, showing a moderate rather than extreme design. Your browser does not support the video tag. We measured 119.4 mm, which is clearly wider than a neutral trainer but still narrower than some max-stack stability options. ![Nike Structure Plus Midsole width - forefoot](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-midsole-width-forefoot-24583655-main.jpg) Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 119\.4 mm \| \| Average \| 114\.5 mm \| Compared to 534 running shoes Number of shoes 102\.2 mm Midsole width - forefoot 127\.9 mm ### Midsole width - heel Moving our calipers to the heel, we measured 94.7 mm. Once again, this reflects what we consistently observed in this shoe, a less aggressive and more beginner-friendly approach to stability. ![Nike Structure Plus Midsole width - heel](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-midsole-width-heel-24583658-main.jpg) Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 94\.7 mm \| \| Average \| 90\.7 mm \| Compared to 534 running shoes Number of shoes 70\.8 mm Midsole width - heel 106\.6 mm ## Durability ### Toebox durability After evaluating the breathability of the Structure Plus, we moved to the durability section of our lab to see how the upper holds up under stress. Ventilated uppers like this often struggle here, and this one followed that pattern with a modest 2/5 result. Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 2 \| \| Average \| 2\.6 \| Compared to 397 running shoes Number of shoes 1 Toebox durability 5 ### Heel padding durability Fortunately, the super-plush heel padding performed much better in our test. This time it earned a solid 4 out of 5. Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 4 \| \| Average \| 3\.3 \| Compared to 391 running shoes Number of shoes 1 Heel padding durability 5 ### Outsole durability Nike has rarely been a market leader in outsole grip or durability when relying on its own compounds... and yes, Vibram-equipped trail models like the [Ultrafly](https://runrepeat.com/nike-ultrafly) do not count here. With the Structure Plus, however, we were satisfied, as our test showed solid durability with only 0.9 mm of rubber worn away. Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 0\.9 mm \| \| Average \| 1\.1 mm \| Compared to 375 running shoes Number of shoes 0\.0 mm Outsole wear 2\.0 mm ### Outsole thickness The outsole also offers a generous thickness of 3.4 mm. Combined with the durability result we observed, we believe runners can feel confident about the long-term wear of the shoe. ![Nike Structure Plus Outsole thickness](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-outsole-thickness-24583645-main.jpg) Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 3\.4 mm \| \| Average \| 3\.2 mm \| Compared to 530 running shoes Number of shoes 0\.5 mm Outsole thickness 6\.1 mm ## Misc ### Insole thickness The insole is quite basic, made from EVA foam, and adds 4.9 mm of cushioning to the Structure Plus. ![Nike Structure Plus Insole thickness](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-insole-thickness-24583665-main.jpg) Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 4\.9 mm \| \| Average \| 4\.5 mm \| Compared to 528 running shoes Number of shoes 1\.5 mm Insole thickness 7\.8 mm ### Removable insole Removing the insole from the Structure Plus is quick and easy. And yes, we know it is a road shoe, thanks Nike\! ![Nike Structure Plus Removable insole](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-removable-insole-24583656-main.jpg) Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| Yes \| ### Midsole softness in cold (%) Runners planning to use the Structure Plus in very cold weather will appreciate this lab result. It became only 2% firmer after spending 20 minutes in our freezer. ![Nike Structure Plus Midsole softness in cold (%)](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-midsole-softness-in-cold-24583681-main.jpg) Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 2% \| \| Average \| 23% \| Compared to 458 running shoes Number of shoes 0% Midsole softness in cold 63% ### Reflective elements Nike includes reflective elements on the heel, but we did not find them particularly impressive. If anything, they felt rather underwhelming. Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| Yes \| ### Tongue padding We noticed that Nike slightly updated the lacing system compared to the regular Structure, yet the overall fit feels very similar. The laces also pass twice under a central tongue loop, helping reduce unwanted tongue movement during runs. ![Nike Structure Plus laces](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-laces-24583680-main.jpg) The step-in feel is comfortable thanks to a thick tongue with 7.9 mm of padding, which feels more than sufficient for running and everyday wear. Considering the already high weight of the shoe, adding more padding looks like a bad idea. ![Nike Structure Plus Tongue padding](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-tongue-padding-24583661-main.jpg) Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 7\.9 mm \| \| Average \| 5\.7 mm \| Compared to 531 running shoes Number of shoes 0\.4 mm Tongue padding 14\.2 mm ### Tongue: gusset type The tongue is not gusseted to the sides, which feels disappointing for a shoe at this price point. It is a tough pill to swallow. ![Nike Structure Plus Tongue: gusset type](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-tongue-gusset-type-24583657-main.jpg) Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| None \| ### Heel tab The heel collar curves inward with plush padding, delivering secure ankle lockdown while skipping the a finger loop tab. ![Nike Structure Plus Heel tab](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-heel-tab-24583664-main.jpg) Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| None \| ### Price The Plus label in the Structure name does not bring encouraging news for the price, just as we saw with the [Pegasus Plus](https://runrepeat.com/nike-pegasus-plus). Consequently, the cost can feel quite steep given its performance and relatively muted ride. However, it can be a worthwhile upgrade for runners seeking the next step beyond the regular Structure, as it introduces an approach to stability that Nike has not offered before with the use of ZoomX foam. And the fact that the shoe also works so easily as a sneaker helps with the high price too. Test results \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| C\$290 \| Compared to 534 running shoes Number of shoes \$60 Price \$300 ## Lab test results \| Lab test \| Nike Structure Plus \| Average \| \|---\|---\|---\| \| Cushioning \| \| \| \| Shock absorption heel \| 140 SA \| 130 SA \| \| Energy return heel \| 58\.2% \| 58\.6% \| \| Heel stack \| 40\.9 mm \| 35\.0 mm \| \| Forefoot stack \| 29\.7 mm \| 26\.4 mm \| \| Drop \| 11\.2 mm \| 8\.6 mm \| \| Midsole softness (new method) \| 29\.5 AC \| 36\.1 AC \| \| Secondary foam softness (new method) \| 37\.7 AC \| 39\.4 AC \| \| Size and fit \| \| \| \| Size \| True to size \| True to size \| \| Internal length \| 272\.9 mm \| 269\.5 mm \| \| Width / Fit (new method) \| 93\.4 mm \| 95\.2 mm \| \| Toebox width (new method) \| 72\.5 mm \| 73\.3 mm \| \| Toebox height \| 26\.0 mm \| 27\.0 mm \| \| Traction / Grip \| \| \| \| Forefoot traction \| 0\.51 \| 0\.50 \| \| Flexibility / Stiffness \| \| \| \| Flexibility / Stiffness (new method) \| 19\.3N \| 15\.5N \| \| Weight \| \| \| \| Weight \| 10\.3 oz (292g) \| 9\.3 oz (264g) \| \| Breathability \| \| \| \| Breathability \| 4 \| 3\.6 \| \| Stability \| \| \| \| Torsional rigidity (old method) \| 4 \| 3\.5 \| \| Heel counter stiffness \| 4 \| 3 \| \| Midsole width - forefoot \| 119\.4 mm \| 114\.5 mm \| \| Midsole width - heel \| 94\.7 mm \| 90\.7 mm \| \| Durability \| \| \| \| Toebox durability \| 2 \| 2\.6 \| \| Heel padding durability \| 4 \| 3\.3 \| \| Outsole durability \| 0\.9 mm \| 1\.1 mm \| \| Outsole thickness \| 3\.4 mm \| 3\.2 mm \| \| Misc \| \| \| \| Insole thickness \| 4\.9 mm \| 4\.5 mm \| \| Removable insole \| Yes \| \| \| Midsole softness in cold (new method) \| 30\.2 HA \| 37\.1 HA \| \| Midsole softness in cold (%) \| 2% \| 23% \| \| Reflective elements \| Yes \| \| \| Tongue padding \| 7\.9 mm \| 5\.7 mm \| \| Tongue: gusset type \| None \| \| \| Heel tab \| None \| \| \| Price \| C\$290 \| \| ## Specs (brand) \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Terrain: \| [Road](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/road-running-shoes) \| \| Arch support: \| [Stability](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/stability-running-shoes) \| \| Heel height: \| 42 mm \| \| Forefoot height: \| 32 mm \| \| Collection: \| Nike Structure, [Nike Zoomx](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/nike-zoomx-running-shoes) \| \| Weight: \| Men: 10\.9 oz / 309g \\| Women: 8\.7 oz / 248g \| \| Drop: \| 10 mm \| \| Pronation: \| [Overpronation](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/overpronation-running-shoes) \| \| Arch type: \| [Low arch](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/low-arch-running-shoes) \| \| Use: \| Jogging \\| [Treadmill](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/treadmill-running-shoes) \\| [Walking](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/walking-running-shoes) \\| All-day wear \| \| Material: \| Mesh \\| Reflective \| \| Features: \| [Orthotic friendly](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/orthotic-friendly-running-shoes) \\| [Cushioned](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/cushioned-running-shoes) \\| Removable insole \| \| Strike Pattern: \| [Heel strike](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/heel-strike-running-shoes) \| \| Condition: \| [Flat feet](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/flat-feet-running-shoes) \| \| Season: \| All seasons \| \| BRAND Brand: \| [Nike](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/nike-running-shoes) \| \| Type: \| [Breathable](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/breathable-running-shoes) \\| [Comfortable](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/comfortable-running-shoes) \\| [Maximalist](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/maximalist-running-shoes) \| \| Widths available: \| Normal, [Wide](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/wide-running-shoes) \| \| Pace: \| [Daily running](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/daily-running-running-shoes) \| \| SKUs: \| HQ3048001 , HQ3048003 , HQ3048101 , HQ3048400 , HQ3048500 , HQ3048501 , HQ3049100 , HQ3049101 , HQ3049500 , HQ3049502 \| ## Compare popularity Interactive Compare the popularity of another shoe to Nike Structure Plus: Author [![Carlos Sánchez](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/images/experts/carlos-sanchez.jpg)](https://runrepeat.com/author/carlos-sanchez "Carlos Sánchez") [Carlos Sánchez](https://runrepeat.com/author/carlos-sanchez) Each week, Carlos conquers over 100K, navigating through the beaches and trails of Málaga. He’s not just passionate about running—he’s obsessed with the technology behind it, burning through 50 pairs of shoes annually, constantly exploring the latest advancements in modern materials. Recently, he conquered the Six Marathon Majors and recorded sub-3-hour finishes in each of his last 5 marathons. [All articles and reviews](https://runrepeat.com/author/carlos-sanchez) #### Partnerships [Footwear testing / Prototype testing](https://runrepeat.com/footwear-testing-services) [Lab data for academic use](https://runrepeat.com/science-use) [Retailer Data Access (API)](https://runrepeat.com/retailers) [Affiliate](https://runrepeat.com/partnerships) #### Content [Shoe pipeline](https://runrepeat.com/shoe-pipeline) [Guides](https://runrepeat.com/news/guide) [Size charts](https://runrepeat.com/size-charts) [News](https://runrepeat.com/news) #### About [About RunRepeat](https://runrepeat.com/about) [How we test](https://runrepeat.com/testing-methodology) [Legal disclaimer](https://runrepeat.com/legal-disclaimer) [Privacy policy](https://runrepeat.com/privacy-policy) [Sitemap](https://runrepeat.com/sitemap) [English](https://runrepeat.com/nike-structure-plus) \\| [Español](https://runrepeat.com/es/nike-structure-plus) Copyright © 2026 [RunRepeat.com](https://runrepeat.com/)
Readable Markdown	Who should buy In our opinion, the Nike Structure Plus is a compelling option for: - Runners loyal to Nike who want the brand’s most advanced stability trainer so far. - Those who prefer stability shoes with a classic geometry instead of aggressive rocker designs. - Anyone looking for a daily trainer that blends sneaker-style looks with amazing support. - Long-time Structure fans who want a step up in tech and comfort. The added ZoomX layer and new upper bring a more premium feel compared to previous versions. ![Nike Structure Plus](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-24583667-main.jpg) Who should NOT buy The main drawback of the Nike Structure Plus is its high price. In our view, many runners will struggle to justify that cost for simple daily mileage. We think beginners especially may hesitate too, particularly when more affordable options like the [Nike Structure 26](https://runrepeat.com/nike-structure-26) or the [ASICS GT 2000 14](https://runrepeat.com/asics-gt-2000-14) deliver reliable support and similar versatility. Your browser does not support the video tag. We also believe the shoe’s weight hurts its overall experience. During our runs it felt noticeably bottom-heavy and far from a fast-paced trainer when pushing the pace. From our perspective, lighter stability options like the [Saucony Tempus 2](https://runrepeat.com/saucony-tempus-2) or the [HOKA Arahi 8](https://runrepeat.com/hoka-arahi-8) offer a more agile feel and can even handle some tempo sessions. ![Nike Structure Plus parts](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-parts-24583669-main.jpg) Cushioning Shock absorption The midsole of the Structure Plus is clearly thick, so we expected above-average results in our shock absorption test. After completing all procedures, we measured 140 SA in the heel and 110 SA in the forefoot, which is solid for everyday runs but not especially impressive. However, for runners seeking a bit more cushioning than the regular Structure 26 (132 SA / 99 SA), Nike delivers. ![Nike Structure Plus Shock absorption heel](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-shock-absorption-heel-24583638-main.jpg) Heel Forefoot \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 140 SA \| \| Average \| 130 SA \| Compared to 341 running shoes Number of shoes 52 SA Shock absorption 173 SA Energy return The ZoomX logo looked promising, yet during our runs the shoe felt far from pogo-stick bouncy, if anything the opposite. Indeed, our lab results confirmed this impression, showing just 58.2% energy return in the heel and 65.2% in the forefoot. The forefoot contains more ZoomX relative to ReactX, so the difference between both measurements makes sense. Consequently, with these numbers the shoe will feel a tiny bit energetic but only for midfoot and forefoot strikers. Heel Forefoot \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 58\.2% \| \| Average \| 58\.6% \| Compared to 338 running shoes Number of shoes 38\.0% Energy return 83\.0% Heel stack At 40.9 mm, Nike went fully maximalist with the Structure Plus, and that is exactly how the shoe feels underfoot. As soon as we started running in it, we immediately noticed how elevated our feet sit above the ground. ![Nike Structure Plus Side](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-side-24583679-main.jpg) However, do not be misled by the massive sidewalls that Nike designed to help prevent the arch from collapsing. The platform is tall, but not that tall. ![Nike Structure Plus Heel stack](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-heel-stack-24583644-main.jpg) \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 40\.9 mm \| \| Average \| 35\.0 mm \| Compared to 533 running shoes Number of shoes 22\.5 mm Heel stack 48\.1 mm Forefoot stack The forefoot rises 29.7 mm from the ground, offering plenty of foam for easy runs and delivering the solid cushioning as we observed earlier in our shock absorption test. ![Nike Structure Plus Forefoot stack](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-forefoot-stack-24583643-main.jpg) \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 29\.7 mm \| \| Average \| 26\.4 mm \| Compared to 533 running shoes Number of shoes 13\.7 mm Forefoot stack 38\.5 mm Drop Most runners are used to Nike deploying a high drop in its [daily running shoes](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/daily-running-running-shoes), and we found that the Structure Plus follows that same steep geometry. With 11.2 mm of actual heel-to-toe drop, it's clear to us that rearfoot strikers will feel right at home in this shoe. ![Nike Structure Plus Drop](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-drop-24583646-main.jpg) \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 11\.2 mm \| \| Average \| 8\.6 mm \| Compared to 533 running shoes Number of shoes \-0.1 mm Drop 16\.1 mm ### Midsole softness Updated Note: Low measurement: softer. High measurement: firmer. The ZoomX logo is not as impressive today as it once was. Nike has adjusted the formula using a TPE foam instead of Pebax for training shoes, and many other brands now use premium foams in their trainers. Your browser does not support the video tag. However, after testing the shoe ourselves we still found that this version of ZoomX performs well for the Structure Plus, delivering a plush and forgiving ride underfoot. Our Asker C durometer measured 29.5 AC for the top layer, which is clearly softer than the average. ![Nike Structure Plus Midsole softness](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-midsole-softness-24583642-main.jpg) \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 29\.5 AC \| \| Average \| 36\.1 AC \| Compared to 191 running shoes Number of shoes 19\.6 AC Midsole softness (soft to firm) 54\.0 AC ### Secondary foam Updated Note: Low measurement: softer. High measurement: firmer. The dual-foam design of the Nike Structure Plus places ReactX beneath ZoomX, and that positioning is no coincidence. ZoomX brings softness and energy return, while ReactX adds stability and durability. ![Nike Structure Plus ReactX](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-react-x-24583671-main.jpg) However, ReactX also makes the ride feel more muted and less lively. In our durometer test it measured 37.7 AC, confirming its firmer nature, which is expected in a stability-focused shoe anyway. ![Nike Structure Plus Secondary foam softness](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-secondary-foam-softness-24583640-main.jpg) \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 37\.7 AC \| \| Average \| 39\.4 AC \| Compared to 82 running shoes Number of shoes 23\.6 AC Secondary foam (soft to firm) 64\.0 AC Rocker Some brands are moving toward highly rockered designs on every shoe, but Nike avoids that approach with the Structure Plus. In our view, that is a sensible decision for a stability daily trainer. This design makes the shoe a strong option for runners who prefer a more classic midsole geometry. It also feels more natural when walking or wearing the shoe casually, which seems like something Nike clearly considered when creating this sneaker-friendly design. ![Nike Structure Plus Rocker](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-rocker-24583647-main.jpg) Size and fit Nike Structure Plus fits true to size (29 votes). Small True to size Large Internal length Note: Our testing shows that internal length is not a great measure of fit. But, as many users have requested this specific test, we've decided to add it for those interested. ![Nike Structure Plus Internal length](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-internal-length-24583663-main.jpg) \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 272\.9 mm \| \| Average \| 269\.5 mm \| Compared to 276 running shoes Number of shoes 259\.5 mm Internal length 277\.6 mm Width / Fit As with every shoe we test, we purchased the Nike Structure Plus in US 9 with standard width. It is also worth noting that Nike offers this model in a Wide version, although availability may vary by market. Your browser does not support the video tag. That said, we began taking measurements on our pair. With 93.4 mm in our first reading, it shows a classic Nike fit that likely will not suit wide feet well, though we still needed to complete the rest of our measurements. ![Nike Structure Plus Width / Fit](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-width-fit-24583660-main.jpg) \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 93\.4 mm \| \| Average \| 95\.2 mm \| Compared to 288 running shoes Number of shoes 88\.5 mm Width / Fit 101\.4 mm Toebox width The second measurement also came in slightly below average at 72.5 mm, though only by a small margin. We consider it a very standard fit, and we believe anyone who has worn Nike shoes before will find the feel familiar on foot. ![Nike Structure Plus Toebox width](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-toebox-width-24583662-main.jpg) \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 72\.5 mm \| \| Average \| 73\.3 mm \| Compared to 288 running shoes Number of shoes 66\.7 mm Toebox width 82\.6 mm Toebox height Toebox height follows the same pattern as the previous two measurements, so there are no surprises here. Your browser does not support the video tag. At 26.0 mm, the figure feels reasonable to us, especially since stability shoes often benefit from a slightly snugger fit to help contain lateral forces and improve support. ![Nike Structure Plus Toebox height](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-toebox-height-24583659-main.jpg) \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 26\.0 mm \| \| Average \| 27\.0 mm \| Compared to 288 running shoes Number of shoes 22\.0 mm Toebox height 34\.1 mm Traction / Grip Traction test One area that needed improvement from the regular Structure was traction. We previously measured 0.37, and fortunately the Plus version raises that figure to a more acceptable 0.51. It is still not impressive, but it now delivers dependable grip, even when running in the rain. \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 0\.51 \| \| Average \| 0\.50 \| Compared to 332 running shoes Number of shoes 0\.11 Forefoot traction 0\.89 Outsole design The outsole keeps a very similar layout to the Structure 26, preserving most of its design DNA with only small visual tweaks. It combines black "YC O-LITE" rubber in the forefoot with bright green "OG/RS 002" high abrasion rubber panels across the midfoot and heel. The rearfoot and midfoot rubber provide solid protection, especially because the rubber sits clearly higher than the exposed foam. We also noted a very deep cutout in the center of the heel that helps with foam compression too. ![Nike Structure Plus Outsole design](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-outsole-design-24583654-main.jpg) Flexibility / Stiffness To enjoy the Nike Structure Plus, you definitely need to be a fan of longitudinally stiff shoes. With 19.3N in our lab test, it quickly becomes a no-go for runners who prefer a more flexible feel underfoot. ![Nike Structure Plus Flexibility / Stiffness](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-flexibility-stiffness-24583641-main.jpg) \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 19\.3N \| \| Average \| 15\.5N \| Compared to 335 running shoes Number of shoes 3\.9N Flexibility Stiffness 28\.5N Weight The Nike Structure Plus is only 1% lighter than the Structure 26, coming in at 10.3 oz or 292g. That small reduction hardly changes the experience, and the shoe still sits on the heavier side of the current market. For daily mileage it can work, yet during our testing the shoe felt somewhat bottom heavy. In our opinion, this is a missed opportunity for [Nike](https://runrepeat.com/catalog/nike-running-shoes) to gain ground against strong rivals like the [ASICS Gel Kayano 32](https://runrepeat.com/asics-gel-kayano-32). ![Nike Structure Plus Weight](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-weight-24583648-main.jpg) \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 10\.3 oz (292g) \| \| Average \| 9\.3 oz (264g) \| Compared to 534 running shoes Number of shoes 5\.3 oz (149g) Weight 12\.9 oz (366g) Breathability One thing we all should demand from Nike is amazing materials in the Plus and Premium versions of its daily trainers. In this case, we think the Structure Plus delivers on that expectation. Your browser does not support the video tag. The upper feels noticeably better than the one found in the regular version. It improves breathability to a 4 out of 5 score while maintaining the same comfortable overall feel. Your browser does not support the video tag. Nike organizes the upper into three clear zones: a well-ventilated forefoot, a very dense heel designed for stability, and a balanced construction through the midfoot area. ![Nike Structure Plus microscope](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-microscope-24583675-main.jpg) When we examined the upper with our digital microscope, the jump in quality became clear. The mesh looks softer and more refined, and the ventilation holes appear well distributed. ![Nike Structure Plus microscope](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-microscope-2-24583676-main.jpg) Handling the shoe confirms that comfort was a clear priority here. The heel padding is extremely generous, and all the materials feel soft and pleasant to the touch. Your browser does not support the video tag. \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 4 \| \| Average \| 3\.6 \| Compared to 463 running shoes Number of shoes 1 Breathability 5 Stability Lateral stability test The Nike Structure Plus continues to use Nike’s Midfoot Support System to help stabilize the ride and limit pronation. It worked well on the regular Structure, and here Nike made it more pronounced to match the higher stack height of this version. ![Nike Structure Plus Midfoot Support System](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-midfoot-support-system-24583666-main.jpg) The support feels unobtrusive, and it's a good option for those who overpronate as well as neutral runners seeking a more controlled ride, without the harsh feel of older stability shoes. Oh, and we also really liked how Nike integrated support into the upper in a subtle and visually clean way. Torsional rigidity The Structure Plus has a more flexible structure than many stability shoes, which also makes it more comfortable for everyday wear as a sneaker. We rated it 4/5. \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 4 \| \| Average \| 3\.5 \| Compared to 512 running shoes Number of shoes 1 Torsional rigidity 5 Heel counter stiffness The heel counter also scored 4/5 instead of the maximum rating, which is uncommon for this type of shoe. We appreciate having an alternative like this in the market, offering solid stability without that overly stiff feel on foot. \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 4 \| \| Average \| 3 \| Compared to 496 running shoes Number of shoes 1 Heel counter stiffness 5 Midsole width - forefoot The midsole width follows the same pattern we saw in previous tests, showing a moderate rather than extreme design. Your browser does not support the video tag. We measured 119.4 mm, which is clearly wider than a neutral trainer but still narrower than some max-stack stability options. ![Nike Structure Plus Midsole width - forefoot](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-midsole-width-forefoot-24583655-main.jpg) \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 119\.4 mm \| \| Average \| 114\.5 mm \| Compared to 534 running shoes Number of shoes 102\.2 mm Midsole width - forefoot 127\.9 mm Midsole width - heel Moving our calipers to the heel, we measured 94.7 mm. Once again, this reflects what we consistently observed in this shoe, a less aggressive and more beginner-friendly approach to stability. ![Nike Structure Plus Midsole width - heel](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-midsole-width-heel-24583658-main.jpg) \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 94\.7 mm \| \| Average \| 90\.7 mm \| Compared to 534 running shoes Number of shoes 70\.8 mm Midsole width - heel 106\.6 mm Durability Toebox durability After evaluating the breathability of the Structure Plus, we moved to the durability section of our lab to see how the upper holds up under stress. Ventilated uppers like this often struggle here, and this one followed that pattern with a modest 2/5 result. \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 2 \| \| Average \| 2\.6 \| Compared to 397 running shoes Number of shoes 1 Toebox durability 5 Heel padding durability Fortunately, the super-plush heel padding performed much better in our test. This time it earned a solid 4 out of 5. \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 4 \| \| Average \| 3\.3 \| Compared to 391 running shoes Number of shoes 1 Heel padding durability 5 Outsole durability Nike has rarely been a market leader in outsole grip or durability when relying on its own compounds... and yes, Vibram-equipped trail models like the [Ultrafly](https://runrepeat.com/nike-ultrafly) do not count here. With the Structure Plus, however, we were satisfied, as our test showed solid durability with only 0.9 mm of rubber worn away. \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 0\.9 mm \| \| Average \| 1\.1 mm \| Compared to 375 running shoes Number of shoes 0\.0 mm Outsole wear 2\.0 mm Outsole thickness The outsole also offers a generous thickness of 3.4 mm. Combined with the durability result we observed, we believe runners can feel confident about the long-term wear of the shoe. ![Nike Structure Plus Outsole thickness](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-outsole-thickness-24583645-main.jpg) \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 3\.4 mm \| \| Average \| 3\.2 mm \| Compared to 530 running shoes Number of shoes 0\.5 mm Outsole thickness 6\.1 mm Misc Insole thickness The insole is quite basic, made from EVA foam, and adds 4.9 mm of cushioning to the Structure Plus. ![Nike Structure Plus Insole thickness](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-insole-thickness-24583665-main.jpg) \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 4\.9 mm \| \| Average \| 4\.5 mm \| Compared to 528 running shoes Number of shoes 1\.5 mm Insole thickness 7\.8 mm Removable insole Removing the insole from the Structure Plus is quick and easy. And yes, we know it is a road shoe, thanks Nike\! ![Nike Structure Plus Removable insole](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-removable-insole-24583656-main.jpg) \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| Yes \| Midsole softness in cold (%) Runners planning to use the Structure Plus in very cold weather will appreciate this lab result. It became only 2% firmer after spending 20 minutes in our freezer. ![Nike Structure Plus Midsole softness in cold (%)](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-midsole-softness-in-cold-24583681-main.jpg) \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 2% \| \| Average \| 23% \| Compared to 458 running shoes Number of shoes 0% Midsole softness in cold 63% Reflective elements Nike includes reflective elements on the heel, but we did not find them particularly impressive. If anything, they felt rather underwhelming. \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| Yes \| Tongue padding We noticed that Nike slightly updated the lacing system compared to the regular Structure, yet the overall fit feels very similar. The laces also pass twice under a central tongue loop, helping reduce unwanted tongue movement during runs. ![Nike Structure Plus laces](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-laces-24583680-main.jpg) The step-in feel is comfortable thanks to a thick tongue with 7.9 mm of padding, which feels more than sufficient for running and everyday wear. Considering the already high weight of the shoe, adding more padding looks like a bad idea. ![Nike Structure Plus Tongue padding](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-tongue-padding-24583661-main.jpg) \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| 7\.9 mm \| \| Average \| 5\.7 mm \| Compared to 531 running shoes Number of shoes 0\.4 mm Tongue padding 14\.2 mm Tongue: gusset type The tongue is not gusseted to the sides, which feels disappointing for a shoe at this price point. It is a tough pill to swallow. ![Nike Structure Plus Tongue: gusset type](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-tongue-gusset-type-24583657-main.jpg) \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| None \| Heel tab The heel collar curves inward with plush padding, delivering secure ankle lockdown while skipping the a finger loop tab. ![Nike Structure Plus Heel tab](https://cdn.runrepeat.com/storage/gallery/product_content/41077/nike-structure-plus-heel-tab-24583664-main.jpg) \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| None \| Price The Plus label in the Structure name does not bring encouraging news for the price, just as we saw with the [Pegasus Plus](https://runrepeat.com/nike-pegasus-plus). Consequently, the cost can feel quite steep given its performance and relatively muted ride. However, it can be a worthwhile upgrade for runners seeking the next step beyond the regular Structure, as it introduces an approach to stability that Nike has not offered before with the use of ZoomX foam. And the fact that the shoe also works so easily as a sneaker helps with the high price too. \| \| \| \|---\|---\| \| Structure Plus \| C\$290 \| Compared to 534 running shoes Number of shoes \$60 Price \$300
Shard	109 (laksa)
Root Hash	17533309727837234909
Unparsed URL	com,runrepeat!/nike-structure-plus s443