🕷️ Crawler Inspector

URL Lookup

Direct Parameter Lookup

Raw Queries and Responses

1. Shard Calculation

Query:

Response:

Calculated Shard: 129 (from laksa020)

2. Crawled Status Check

Query:

curl -X POST \
  'http://laksa129.int.ahrefs:8124/' \
  -H 'Content-Type: text/plain' \
  -H 'X-ClickHouse-Database: crawler3' \
  -H 'Authorization: Basic YXBpOg==' \
  -d 'SELECT getAhrefsURLFromUnparsed(src_unparsed) AS found_url, ifNull(toUnixTimestamp(download_stamp), 0) AS crawl_time, ifNull(toUnixTimestamp(props_url_first_seen), 0) AS first_indexed_time, download_http_code AS http_code, src_unparsed AS src_unparsed, src_root_hash AS src_root_hash, history_drop_reason AS history_drop_reason, meta_title AS meta_title, meta_descriptions AS meta_descriptions, attrs_boilerpipe_text AS attrs_boilerpipe_text, attrs_markdown AS attrs_markdown, attrs_readable_markdown AS attrs_readable_markdown, meta_canonical AS meta_canonical FROM crawler3.page_info_local FINAL PREWHERE (src_root_hash, src_unparsed) IN ((getAhrefsRootHashFromUnparsed(getAhrefsUnparsedNoserviceFromURL(\'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32107352/\')), getAhrefsUnparsedNoserviceFromURL(\'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32107352/\'))) FORMAT JSONEachRow'

Response:

{"found_url":"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/32107352\/","crawl_time":1755180718,"first_indexed_time":0,"http_code":200,"src_unparsed":"gov,nih!nlm,ncbi,pubmed,\/32107352\/ s443","src_root_hash":"7295144728021232729","history_drop_reason":"tooold","meta_title":"Injury characteristics of the Pulse Nightclub shooting: Lessons for mass casualty incident preparation","meta_descriptions":["Epidemiological Study, level V."],"attrs_boilerpipe_text":"\n          Background:\n         \n      \n      On the morning of June 12, 2016, an armed assailant entered the Pulse Nightclub in Orlando, Florida, and initiated an assault that killed 49 people and injured 53. The regional Level I trauma center and two community hospitals responded to this mass casualty incident. A detailed analysis was performed to guide hospitals who strive to prepare for future similar events.\n     \n          Methods:\n         \n      \n      A retrospective review of all victim charts and\/or autopsy reports was performed to identify victim presentation patterns, injuries sustained, and surgical resources required. Patients were stratified into three groups: survivors who received care at the regional Level I trauma center, survivors who received care at one of two local community hospitals, and decedents.\n     \n          Results:\n         \n      \n      Of the 102 victims, 40 died at the scene and 9 died upon arrival to the Level I trauma center. The remaining 53 victims received definitive medical care and survived. Twenty-nine victims were admitted to the trauma center and five victims to a community hospital. The remaining 19 victims were treated and discharged that day. Decedents sustained significantly more bullet impacts than survivors (4 ± 3 vs. 2 ± 1; p = 0.008) and body regions injured (3 ± 1 vs. 2 ± 1; p = 0.0002). Gunshots to the head, chest, and abdominal body regions were significantly more common among decedents than survivors (p < 0.0001). Eighty-two percent of admitted patients required surgery in the first 24 hours. Essential resources in the first 24 hours included trauma surgeons, emergency room physicians, orthopedic\/hand surgeons, anesthesiologists, vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists, intensivists, and hospitalists.\n     \n          Conclusion:\n         \n      \n      Mass shooting events are associated with high mortality. Survivors commonly sustain multiple, life-threatening ballistic injuries requiring emergent surgery and extensive hospital resources. Given the increasing frequency of mass shootings, all hospitals must have a coordinated plan to respond to a mass casualty event.\n     \n          Level of evidence:\n         \n      \n      Epidemiological Study, level V.\n    ","attrs_markdown":"# Injury characteristics of the Pulse Nightclub shooting: Lessons for mass casualty incident preparation\nJ Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Mar;88(3):372-378.   doi: 10.1097\/TA.0000000000002574.\n\n### Authors\n[Chadwick P Smith](https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/?term=Smith+CP&cauthor_id=32107352)  [1](https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/32107352\/#affiliation-1 \"From the Department of Surgical Education (C.P.S., M.L.C., K.S., H.E., J.A.I., M.W.L., W.S.H., M.S.L.) Orlando Health-Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, FL; Graduate Medical Education, General Surgery Residency (M.G., W.S.E), Advent Health, Orlando, FL.\") , [Michael L Cheatham](https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/?term=Cheatham+ML&cauthor_id=32107352), [Karen Safcsak](https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/?term=Safcsak+K&cauthor_id=32107352), [Heidi Emrani](https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/?term=Emrani+H&cauthor_id=32107352), [Joseph A Ibrahim](https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/?term=Ibrahim+JA&cauthor_id=32107352), [Michael Gregg](https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/?term=Gregg+M&cauthor_id=32107352), [William S Eubanks](https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/?term=Eubanks+WS&cauthor_id=32107352), [Matthew W Lube](https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/?term=Lube+MW&cauthor_id=32107352), [William S Havron](https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/?term=Havron+WS&cauthor_id=32107352), [Marc S Levy](https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/?term=Levy+MS&cauthor_id=32107352)\n\n### Affiliation\n- 1 From the Department of Surgical Education (C.P.S., M.L.C., K.S., H.E., J.A.I., M.W.L., W.S.H., M.S.L.) Orlando Health-Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, FL; Graduate Medical Education, General Surgery Residency (M.G., W.S.E), Advent Health, Orlando, FL.\n\n- PMID:   [32107352](https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/32107352\/)\n- DOI:   [10\\.1097\/TA.0000000000002574](https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/ta.0000000000002574)\n\n## Abstract\n**Background:**  On the morning of June 12, 2016, an armed assailant entered the Pulse Nightclub in Orlando, Florida, and initiated an assault that killed 49 people and injured 53. The regional Level I trauma center and two community hospitals responded to this mass casualty incident. A detailed analysis was performed to guide hospitals who strive to prepare for future similar events.\n\n**Methods:**  A retrospective review of all victim charts and\/or autopsy reports was performed to identify victim presentation patterns, injuries sustained, and surgical resources required. Patients were stratified into three groups: survivors who received care at the regional Level I trauma center, survivors who received care at one of two local community hospitals, and decedents.\n\n**Results:**  Of the 102 victims, 40 died at the scene and 9 died upon arrival to the Level I trauma center. The remaining 53 victims received definitive medical care and survived. Twenty-nine victims were admitted to the trauma center and five victims to a community hospital. The remaining 19 victims were treated and discharged that day. Decedents sustained significantly more bullet impacts than survivors (4 ± 3 vs. 2 ± 1; p = 0.008) and body regions injured (3 ± 1 vs. 2 ± 1; p = 0.0002). Gunshots to the head, chest, and abdominal body regions were significantly more common among decedents than survivors (p \\< 0.0001). Eighty-two percent of admitted patients required surgery in the first 24 hours. Essential resources in the first 24 hours included trauma surgeons, emergency room physicians, orthopedic\/hand surgeons, anesthesiologists, vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists, intensivists, and hospitalists.\n\n**Conclusion:**  Mass shooting events are associated with high mortality. Survivors commonly sustain multiple, life-threatening ballistic injuries requiring emergent surgery and extensive hospital resources. Given the increasing frequency of mass shootings, all hospitals must have a coordinated plan to respond to a mass casualty event.\n\n**Level of evidence:**  Epidemiological Study, level V.\n\n## MeSH terms\n- Disaster Planning \/ organization & administration\\*\n- Emergency Medical Services \/ organization & administration\\*\n- Florida \/ epidemiology\n- Hospitals, Community \/ organization & administration\n- Humans\n- Mass Casualty Incidents\\*\n- Retrospective Studies\n- Trauma Centers \/ organization & administration\n- Wounds, Gunshot \/ mortality\n- Wounds, Gunshot \/ therapy\\*","attrs_readable_markdown":null,"meta_canonical":null}

3. Robots.txt Check

Query:

Response:

4. Spam/Ban Check

Query:

Response:

5. Seen Status Check

ℹ️ Skipped - page is already crawled

🚫

NOT INDEXABLE

✅

CRAWLED

7 months ago

🤖

ROBOTS ALLOWED

Page Info Filters

Filter	Status	Condition	Details
HTTP status	PASS	`download_http_code = 200`	HTTP 200
Age cutoff	FAIL	`download_stamp > now() - 6 MONTH`	7.9 months ago
History drop	FAIL	`isNull(history_drop_reason)`	tooold
Spam/ban	PASS	`fh_dont_index != 1 AND ml_spam_score = 0`	ml_spam_score=0
Canonical	PASS	`meta_canonical IS NULL OR = '' OR = src_unparsed`	Not set

Page Details

Property	Value
URL	https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32107352/
Last Crawled	2025-08-14 14:11:58 (7 months ago)
First Indexed	not set
HTTP Status Code	200
Meta Title	Injury characteristics of the Pulse Nightclub shooting: Lessons for mass casualty incident preparation
Meta Description	Epidemiological Study, level V.
Meta Canonical	null
Boilerpipe Text	Background: On the morning of June 12, 2016, an armed assailant entered the Pulse Nightclub in Orlando, Florida, and initiated an assault that killed 49 people and injured 53. The regional Level I trauma center and two community hospitals responded to this mass casualty incident. A detailed analysis was performed to guide hospitals who strive to prepare for future similar events. Methods: A retrospective review of all victim charts and/or autopsy reports was performed to identify victim presentation patterns, injuries sustained, and surgical resources required. Patients were stratified into three groups: survivors who received care at the regional Level I trauma center, survivors who received care at one of two local community hospitals, and decedents. Results: Of the 102 victims, 40 died at the scene and 9 died upon arrival to the Level I trauma center. The remaining 53 victims received definitive medical care and survived. Twenty-nine victims were admitted to the trauma center and five victims to a community hospital. The remaining 19 victims were treated and discharged that day. Decedents sustained significantly more bullet impacts than survivors (4 ± 3 vs. 2 ± 1; p = 0.008) and body regions injured (3 ± 1 vs. 2 ± 1; p = 0.0002). Gunshots to the head, chest, and abdominal body regions were significantly more common among decedents than survivors (p < 0.0001). Eighty-two percent of admitted patients required surgery in the first 24 hours. Essential resources in the first 24 hours included trauma surgeons, emergency room physicians, orthopedic/hand surgeons, anesthesiologists, vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists, intensivists, and hospitalists. Conclusion: Mass shooting events are associated with high mortality. Survivors commonly sustain multiple, life-threatening ballistic injuries requiring emergent surgery and extensive hospital resources. Given the increasing frequency of mass shootings, all hospitals must have a coordinated plan to respond to a mass casualty event. Level of evidence: Epidemiological Study, level V.
Markdown	# Injury characteristics of the Pulse Nightclub shooting: Lessons for mass casualty incident preparation J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Mar;88(3):372-378. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002574. ### Authors [Chadwick P Smith](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Smith+CP&cauthor_id=32107352) [1](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32107352/#affiliation-1 "From the Department of Surgical Education (C.P.S., M.L.C., K.S., H.E., J.A.I., M.W.L., W.S.H., M.S.L.) Orlando Health-Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, FL; Graduate Medical Education, General Surgery Residency (M.G., W.S.E), Advent Health, Orlando, FL.") , [Michael L Cheatham](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Cheatham+ML&cauthor_id=32107352), [Karen Safcsak](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Safcsak+K&cauthor_id=32107352), [Heidi Emrani](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Emrani+H&cauthor_id=32107352), [Joseph A Ibrahim](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Ibrahim+JA&cauthor_id=32107352), [Michael Gregg](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Gregg+M&cauthor_id=32107352), [William S Eubanks](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Eubanks+WS&cauthor_id=32107352), [Matthew W Lube](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Lube+MW&cauthor_id=32107352), [William S Havron](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Havron+WS&cauthor_id=32107352), [Marc S Levy](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Levy+MS&cauthor_id=32107352) ### Affiliation - 1 From the Department of Surgical Education (C.P.S., M.L.C., K.S., H.E., J.A.I., M.W.L., W.S.H., M.S.L.) Orlando Health-Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, FL; Graduate Medical Education, General Surgery Residency (M.G., W.S.E), Advent Health, Orlando, FL. - PMID: [32107352](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32107352/) - DOI: [10\.1097/TA.0000000000002574](https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000002574) ## Abstract Background: On the morning of June 12, 2016, an armed assailant entered the Pulse Nightclub in Orlando, Florida, and initiated an assault that killed 49 people and injured 53. The regional Level I trauma center and two community hospitals responded to this mass casualty incident. A detailed analysis was performed to guide hospitals who strive to prepare for future similar events. Methods: A retrospective review of all victim charts and/or autopsy reports was performed to identify victim presentation patterns, injuries sustained, and surgical resources required. Patients were stratified into three groups: survivors who received care at the regional Level I trauma center, survivors who received care at one of two local community hospitals, and decedents. Results: Of the 102 victims, 40 died at the scene and 9 died upon arrival to the Level I trauma center. The remaining 53 victims received definitive medical care and survived. Twenty-nine victims were admitted to the trauma center and five victims to a community hospital. The remaining 19 victims were treated and discharged that day. Decedents sustained significantly more bullet impacts than survivors (4 ± 3 vs. 2 ± 1; p = 0.008) and body regions injured (3 ± 1 vs. 2 ± 1; p = 0.0002). Gunshots to the head, chest, and abdominal body regions were significantly more common among decedents than survivors (p \< 0.0001). Eighty-two percent of admitted patients required surgery in the first 24 hours. Essential resources in the first 24 hours included trauma surgeons, emergency room physicians, orthopedic/hand surgeons, anesthesiologists, vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists, intensivists, and hospitalists. Conclusion: Mass shooting events are associated with high mortality. Survivors commonly sustain multiple, life-threatening ballistic injuries requiring emergent surgery and extensive hospital resources. Given the increasing frequency of mass shootings, all hospitals must have a coordinated plan to respond to a mass casualty event. Level of evidence: Epidemiological Study, level V. ## MeSH terms - Disaster Planning / organization & administration\* - Emergency Medical Services / organization & administration\* - Florida / epidemiology - Hospitals, Community / organization & administration - Humans - Mass Casualty Incidents\* - Retrospective Studies - Trauma Centers / organization & administration - Wounds, Gunshot / mortality - Wounds, Gunshot / therapy\*
Readable Markdown	null
Shard	129 (laksa)
Root Hash	7295144728021232729
Unparsed URL	gov,nih!nlm,ncbi,pubmed,/32107352/ s443