âšď¸ Skipped - page is already crawled
| Filter | Status | Condition | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| HTTP status | PASS | download_http_code = 200 | HTTP 200 |
| Age cutoff | PASS | download_stamp > now() - 6 MONTH | 1.3 months ago |
| History drop | PASS | isNull(history_drop_reason) | No drop reason |
| Spam/ban | PASS | fh_dont_index != 1 AND ml_spam_score = 0 | ml_spam_score=0 |
| Canonical | PASS | meta_canonical IS NULL OR = '' OR = src_unparsed | Not set |
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| URL | https://philosophyportal.substack.com/p/the-great-recession-and-its-impact |
| Last Crawled | 2026-02-27 11:21:58 (1 month ago) |
| First Indexed | not set |
| HTTP Status Code | 200 |
| Meta Title | The Great Recession, and its impact on the political consciousness of the Millennial Left |
| Meta Description | Or: How the Millennial Left got lost in a misrecognised fantasy of the 1960s New Left |
| Meta Canonical | null |
| Boilerpipe Text | This year at Philosophy Portal we are unfolding a new course,
Marxist Politics for Undead Millennials
, led by âThe Last Marxistâ, Chris Cutrone. Throughout the course we will be thinking American Revolution, Trump, Lenin, Critical Theory, The Party, and much more. To find out more or to get involved, visit the link below:
Marxist Politics for Undead Millennials
What can be found below is an edited reflection offered by Marxist theorist Chris Cutrone informed by a question that will shape the upcoming class at Philosophy Portal
Marxist Politics for Undead Millennials
.
In terms of thematics, this theme of âGreat Recessionâ is of course one of the formative experiences of the Millennial Left. This means that the Millennial Left had the Great Recession, the financial crisis of 2008, as a kind of formative experience of shaping their consciousness.
Now, in that formative experience, there is some treacherous character to it. This treacherous character means that the 1930s, the Great Depression, was recalled, and compared and contrasted to the Great Recession. Therefore, the Millennial Left started to think the necessity of a reform on the level of Franklin D. Rooseveltâs (FDR) New Deal, as well as Lyndon B. Johnsonâs (LBJ) âGreat Society-ismâ.
However, because it was neoliberalism that went into crisis during the Great Recession, the Millennial Left also saw this event as an opportunity to undo neoliberalism, to in a way go back to pre-neoliberalism, and to restore, albeit in an improved way, FDRâs âNew Dealâ and LBJâs âGreat Societyâ.
Consequently, the Millennial Left sought to redo the major capitalist reforms of the 20th century, but better this time. This is equivalent in their thinking, to doing it in a âmore woke wayâ, i.e. to do it in a more anti-racist, anti-sexist, anti-phobic way, more egalitarian than ever before.
I think there is a lot of confusion in this approach. To understand my confusion in relation to the Millennial Left, you have to remember that I am an older person, I am Gen X. I am not a Millennial.
What that means is that I am familiar with these tropes or quips about how Marxists have predicted 10 out of the last 5 recessions, and 0 of the last 5 booms, 0 out of the last 5 recoveries. In other words, to be a Marxist means to be always predicting the next recession.
I thought, well, that is a miserable position to be in!
However, it also raises all sorts of questions because the Left, as I understand it, is as much a legacy of the 1960s âNew Leftâ as it was of the 1930s âOld Leftâ. There is a kind of mixture of heritage here.
If the 1930s Old Left was a revolt against the poverty generated by capitalism, the 1960s New Left was the revolt against affluence. This means the 1960s New Left was not motivated by a downturn, it was not motivated by a recession, it was not motivated by an economic crisis (e.g. the Great Depression or the Great Recession). The 1960s New Left was motivated by a rebellion against full employment, high wages, and low working hours. In fact, the 1960s had historically high wages and low working hours, and historically low profits and low influence of Wall Street.
We should never forget that the 1960s New Left was revolting against that situation, they were not just trying to make the New Deal dispensation more equal for minorities and women, plus some objections to the Cold War and imperialism.
There is a lot more to the New Left moment than the Millennial Leftâs misrecognition of it. The fact that it is a revolt against affluence, that it is a revolt against capitalism when capitalism seems to be succeeding, doing well inclusive of the New Deal and Great Society reforms.
The 1960s New Left, in other words, is an attempt to point beyond capitalism, beyond the limits of capitalism, not when it fails, but when it is successful. This is very different from objecting to capitalism when it fails.
How should we interpret a New Left that is saying: âcapitalism is succeeding, but we can do better than thisâ? That is clearly very different than what the Millennial Left was saying: âoh, see, capitalism is failing.â
The latter opens itself up to the limits of the Millennial Leftâs political consciousness: âwell, maybe we could just do capitalism better, as opposed to going beyond itâ. This results in the Millennial Leftâs (confused) belief that they could do the FDR âNew Dealâ or LBJâs âGreat Societyâ, but better this time.
Key readings for class on February 28th:
Cutrone, C. 2023. Obama: three comparisons: MLK, JFK, FDR. In:
The Death of the Millennial Left
. Sublation Press. p. 41-46.
Cutrone, C. 2023. Obama and Clinton. In:
The Death of the Millennial Left
. Sublation Press. p. 47-52.
Cutrone, C. 2023. Finance capital. In:
The Death of the Millennial Left
. Sublation Press. p. 53-56.
Cutrone, C. 2023. Symptology. In:
The Death of the Millennial Left
. Sublation Press. p. 57-64.
Cutrone, C. 2023. Friedrich Hayek and the legacy of Milton Friedman. In:
The Death of the Millennial Left
. Sublation Press. p. 65-72.
Cutrone, C. 2023. Whither Marxism? In:
The Death of the Millennial Left
. Sublation Press. p. 73-78.
Cutrone C. 2023. A cry of protest before accommodation? In:
The Death of the Millennial Left
. Sublation Press. p. 79-84.
Key prompts/questions:
How did the Great Recession lead to a retroactive reconstruction of right-wing projects in the 20th century as left-wing?
How distorted was the Millennial Leftâs understanding of the motivations and context of the 1960s New Left?
What is âwoke politicsâ, its relationship to the Great Recession, or the way it interfaces with general political ideation in 21st century Left politics?
How should we interpret reactions against capitalism when capitalism itself is succeeding? (i.e. full employment, high wages, low working hours)
Did the Millennial Leftâs political ambitions always actually remain within the coordinates of âdoing capitalism betterâ?
To learn more about the course
Marxist Politics for Undead Millennials
, or to sign up:
Marxist Politics for Undead Millennials
No posts |
| Markdown | [](https://philosophyportal.substack.com/)
# [Philosophy Portal](https://philosophyportal.substack.com/)
Subscribe
Sign in
# The Great Recession, and its impact on the political consciousness of the Millennial Left
### Or: How the Millennial Left got lost in a misrecognised fantasy of the 1960s New Left
[](https://substack.com/@philosophyportal)
[Cadell Last](https://substack.com/@philosophyportal)
Feb 25, 2026
5
1
1
Share
[](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!v6cv!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F73b0b5db-53ed-4369-bcb4-16d9cb8f3875_962x884.heic)
This year at Philosophy Portal we are unfolding a new course, *Marxist Politics for Undead Millennials*, led by âThe Last Marxistâ, Chris Cutrone. Throughout the course we will be thinking American Revolution, Trump, Lenin, Critical Theory, The Party, and much more. To find out more or to get involved, visit the link below:
[Marxist Politics for Undead Millennials](https://philosophyportal.online/marxist-politics-for-undead-millennials)
***
What can be found below is an edited reflection offered by Marxist theorist Chris Cutrone informed by a question that will shape the upcoming class at Philosophy Portal *Marxist Politics for Undead Millennials*.
## How does Marxism frame the Great Recession of 2008 and general economic crises in capitalism?
In terms of thematics, this theme of âGreat Recessionâ is of course one of the formative experiences of the Millennial Left. This means that the Millennial Left had the Great Recession, the financial crisis of 2008, as a kind of formative experience of shaping their consciousness.
Now, in that formative experience, there is some treacherous character to it. This treacherous character means that the 1930s, the Great Depression, was recalled, and compared and contrasted to the Great Recession. Therefore, the Millennial Left started to think the necessity of a reform on the level of Franklin D. Rooseveltâs (FDR) New Deal, as well as Lyndon B. Johnsonâs (LBJ) âGreat Society-ismâ.
However, because it was neoliberalism that went into crisis during the Great Recession, the Millennial Left also saw this event as an opportunity to undo neoliberalism, to in a way go back to pre-neoliberalism, and to restore, albeit in an improved way, FDRâs âNew Dealâ and LBJâs âGreat Societyâ.
Consequently, the Millennial Left sought to redo the major capitalist reforms of the 20th century, but better this time. This is equivalent in their thinking, to doing it in a âmore woke wayâ, i.e. to do it in a more anti-racist, anti-sexist, anti-phobic way, more egalitarian than ever before.
I think there is a lot of confusion in this approach. To understand my confusion in relation to the Millennial Left, you have to remember that I am an older person, I am Gen X. I am not a Millennial.
What that means is that I am familiar with these tropes or quips about how Marxists have predicted 10 out of the last 5 recessions, and 0 of the last 5 booms, 0 out of the last 5 recoveries. In other words, to be a Marxist means to be always predicting the next recession.
I thought, well, that is a miserable position to be in\!
However, it also raises all sorts of questions because the Left, as I understand it, is as much a legacy of the 1960s âNew Leftâ as it was of the 1930s âOld Leftâ. There is a kind of mixture of heritage here.
If the 1930s Old Left was a revolt against the poverty generated by capitalism, the 1960s New Left was the revolt against affluence. This means the 1960s New Left was not motivated by a downturn, it was not motivated by a recession, it was not motivated by an economic crisis (e.g. the Great Depression or the Great Recession). The 1960s New Left was motivated by a rebellion against full employment, high wages, and low working hours. In fact, the 1960s had historically high wages and low working hours, and historically low profits and low influence of Wall Street.
We should never forget that the 1960s New Left was revolting against that situation, they were not just trying to make the New Deal dispensation more equal for minorities and women, plus some objections to the Cold War and imperialism.
There is a lot more to the New Left moment than the Millennial Leftâs misrecognition of it. The fact that it is a revolt against affluence, that it is a revolt against capitalism when capitalism seems to be succeeding, doing well inclusive of the New Deal and Great Society reforms.
The 1960s New Left, in other words, is an attempt to point beyond capitalism, beyond the limits of capitalism, not when it fails, but when it is successful. This is very different from objecting to capitalism when it fails.
How should we interpret a New Left that is saying: âcapitalism is succeeding, but we can do better than thisâ? That is clearly very different than what the Millennial Left was saying: âoh, see, capitalism is failing.â
The latter opens itself up to the limits of the Millennial Leftâs political consciousness: âwell, maybe we could just do capitalism better, as opposed to going beyond itâ. This results in the Millennial Leftâs (confused) belief that they could do the FDR âNew Dealâ or LBJâs âGreat Societyâ, but better this time.
***
Key readings for class on February 28th:
- Cutrone, C. 2023. Obama: three comparisons: MLK, JFK, FDR. In: *The Death of the Millennial Left*. Sublation Press. p. 41-46.
- Cutrone, C. 2023. Obama and Clinton. In: *The Death of the Millennial Left*. Sublation Press. p. 47-52.
- Cutrone, C. 2023. Finance capital. In: *The Death of the Millennial Left*. Sublation Press. p. 53-56.
- Cutrone, C. 2023. Symptology. In: *The Death of the Millennial Left*. Sublation Press. p. 57-64.
- Cutrone, C. 2023. Friedrich Hayek and the legacy of Milton Friedman. In: *The Death of the Millennial Left*. Sublation Press. p. 65-72.
- Cutrone, C. 2023. Whither Marxism? In: *The Death of the Millennial Left*. Sublation Press. p. 73-78.
- Cutrone C. 2023. A cry of protest before accommodation? In: *The Death of the Millennial Left*. Sublation Press. p. 79-84.
Key prompts/questions:
- How did the Great Recession lead to a retroactive reconstruction of right-wing projects in the 20th century as left-wing?
- How distorted was the Millennial Leftâs understanding of the motivations and context of the 1960s New Left?
- What is âwoke politicsâ, its relationship to the Great Recession, or the way it interfaces with general political ideation in 21st century Left politics?
- How should we interpret reactions against capitalism when capitalism itself is succeeding? (i.e. full employment, high wages, low working hours)
- Did the Millennial Leftâs political ambitions always actually remain within the coordinates of âdoing capitalism betterâ?
***
To learn more about the course *Marxist Politics for Undead Millennials*, or to sign up:
[Marxist Politics for Undead Millennials](https://philosophyportal.online/marxist-politics-for-undead-millennials)
***
Enter The Portal.
5
1
1
Share
#### Discussion about this post
Comments
Restacks
[](https://substack.com/profile/284503401-pigeonreligion?utm_source=comment)
[PigeonReligion](https://substack.com/profile/284503401-pigeonreligion?utm_source=substack-feed-item)
[1d](https://philosophyportal.substack.com/p/the-great-recession-and-its-impact/comment/219906413 "Feb 26, 2026, 6:34 AM")
Liked by Cadell Last
The millennial great repression of the Great Recession\!
[Reply]()
[Share]()
Top
Latest
Discussions
No posts
### Ready for more?
Š 2026 Cadell Last ¡ [Privacy](https://substack.com/privacy) â [Terms](https://substack.com/tos) â [Collection notice](https://substack.com/ccpa#personal-data-collected)
[Start your Substack](https://substack.com/signup?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=web&utm_content=footer)
[Get the app](https://substack.com/app/app-store-redirect?utm_campaign=app-marketing&utm_content=web-footer-button)
[Substack](https://substack.com/) is the home for great culture
This site requires JavaScript to run correctly. Please [turn on JavaScript](https://enable-javascript.com/) or unblock scripts |
| Readable Markdown | [](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!v6cv!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F73b0b5db-53ed-4369-bcb4-16d9cb8f3875_962x884.heic)
This year at Philosophy Portal we are unfolding a new course, *Marxist Politics for Undead Millennials*, led by âThe Last Marxistâ, Chris Cutrone. Throughout the course we will be thinking American Revolution, Trump, Lenin, Critical Theory, The Party, and much more. To find out more or to get involved, visit the link below:
[Marxist Politics for Undead Millennials](https://philosophyportal.online/marxist-politics-for-undead-millennials)
What can be found below is an edited reflection offered by Marxist theorist Chris Cutrone informed by a question that will shape the upcoming class at Philosophy Portal *Marxist Politics for Undead Millennials*.
In terms of thematics, this theme of âGreat Recessionâ is of course one of the formative experiences of the Millennial Left. This means that the Millennial Left had the Great Recession, the financial crisis of 2008, as a kind of formative experience of shaping their consciousness.
Now, in that formative experience, there is some treacherous character to it. This treacherous character means that the 1930s, the Great Depression, was recalled, and compared and contrasted to the Great Recession. Therefore, the Millennial Left started to think the necessity of a reform on the level of Franklin D. Rooseveltâs (FDR) New Deal, as well as Lyndon B. Johnsonâs (LBJ) âGreat Society-ismâ.
However, because it was neoliberalism that went into crisis during the Great Recession, the Millennial Left also saw this event as an opportunity to undo neoliberalism, to in a way go back to pre-neoliberalism, and to restore, albeit in an improved way, FDRâs âNew Dealâ and LBJâs âGreat Societyâ.
Consequently, the Millennial Left sought to redo the major capitalist reforms of the 20th century, but better this time. This is equivalent in their thinking, to doing it in a âmore woke wayâ, i.e. to do it in a more anti-racist, anti-sexist, anti-phobic way, more egalitarian than ever before.
I think there is a lot of confusion in this approach. To understand my confusion in relation to the Millennial Left, you have to remember that I am an older person, I am Gen X. I am not a Millennial.
What that means is that I am familiar with these tropes or quips about how Marxists have predicted 10 out of the last 5 recessions, and 0 of the last 5 booms, 0 out of the last 5 recoveries. In other words, to be a Marxist means to be always predicting the next recession.
I thought, well, that is a miserable position to be in\!
However, it also raises all sorts of questions because the Left, as I understand it, is as much a legacy of the 1960s âNew Leftâ as it was of the 1930s âOld Leftâ. There is a kind of mixture of heritage here.
If the 1930s Old Left was a revolt against the poverty generated by capitalism, the 1960s New Left was the revolt against affluence. This means the 1960s New Left was not motivated by a downturn, it was not motivated by a recession, it was not motivated by an economic crisis (e.g. the Great Depression or the Great Recession). The 1960s New Left was motivated by a rebellion against full employment, high wages, and low working hours. In fact, the 1960s had historically high wages and low working hours, and historically low profits and low influence of Wall Street.
We should never forget that the 1960s New Left was revolting against that situation, they were not just trying to make the New Deal dispensation more equal for minorities and women, plus some objections to the Cold War and imperialism.
There is a lot more to the New Left moment than the Millennial Leftâs misrecognition of it. The fact that it is a revolt against affluence, that it is a revolt against capitalism when capitalism seems to be succeeding, doing well inclusive of the New Deal and Great Society reforms.
The 1960s New Left, in other words, is an attempt to point beyond capitalism, beyond the limits of capitalism, not when it fails, but when it is successful. This is very different from objecting to capitalism when it fails.
How should we interpret a New Left that is saying: âcapitalism is succeeding, but we can do better than thisâ? That is clearly very different than what the Millennial Left was saying: âoh, see, capitalism is failing.â
The latter opens itself up to the limits of the Millennial Leftâs political consciousness: âwell, maybe we could just do capitalism better, as opposed to going beyond itâ. This results in the Millennial Leftâs (confused) belief that they could do the FDR âNew Dealâ or LBJâs âGreat Societyâ, but better this time.
Key readings for class on February 28th:
- Cutrone, C. 2023. Obama: three comparisons: MLK, JFK, FDR. In: *The Death of the Millennial Left*. Sublation Press. p. 41-46.
- Cutrone, C. 2023. Obama and Clinton. In: *The Death of the Millennial Left*. Sublation Press. p. 47-52.
- Cutrone, C. 2023. Finance capital. In: *The Death of the Millennial Left*. Sublation Press. p. 53-56.
- Cutrone, C. 2023. Symptology. In: *The Death of the Millennial Left*. Sublation Press. p. 57-64.
- Cutrone, C. 2023. Friedrich Hayek and the legacy of Milton Friedman. In: *The Death of the Millennial Left*. Sublation Press. p. 65-72.
- Cutrone, C. 2023. Whither Marxism? In: *The Death of the Millennial Left*. Sublation Press. p. 73-78.
- Cutrone C. 2023. A cry of protest before accommodation? In: *The Death of the Millennial Left*. Sublation Press. p. 79-84.
Key prompts/questions:
- How did the Great Recession lead to a retroactive reconstruction of right-wing projects in the 20th century as left-wing?
- How distorted was the Millennial Leftâs understanding of the motivations and context of the 1960s New Left?
- What is âwoke politicsâ, its relationship to the Great Recession, or the way it interfaces with general political ideation in 21st century Left politics?
- How should we interpret reactions against capitalism when capitalism itself is succeeding? (i.e. full employment, high wages, low working hours)
- Did the Millennial Leftâs political ambitions always actually remain within the coordinates of âdoing capitalism betterâ?
To learn more about the course *Marxist Politics for Undead Millennials*, or to sign up:
[Marxist Politics for Undead Millennials](https://philosophyportal.online/marxist-politics-for-undead-millennials)
No posts |
| Shard | 76 (laksa) |
| Root Hash | 14862242593741677076 |
| Unparsed URL | com,substack!philosophyportal,/p/the-great-recession-and-its-impact s443 |