🕷️ Crawler Inspector

Aidt, T. S., & Franck, R. (2013). How to get the snowball rolling and extend the franchise: Voting on the Great Reform Act of 1832. Public Choice , 155 (3), 229–250. Google Scholar Aidt, T. S., & Franck, R. (2019). What motivates and oligarchic elite to democratize? Evidence from the roll call vote on the great reform act of 1832. Journal of Economic History , 79 (3), 1–35. Google Scholar Aidt, T. S., Castro, V., & Martins, R. (2018). Shades of red and blue: Government ideology and sustainable development. Public Choice , 175 (3), 303–323. Google Scholar Alabrese, E., Becker, S. O., Fetzer, T., & Novy, D. (2019). Who voted for brexit? Individual and regional data combined. European Journal of Political Economy , 56 , 132–150. Google Scholar Arnorsson, A., & Zoega, G. (2018). On the causes of Brexit. European Journal of Political Economy , 55 , 301–323. Google Scholar Baughman, J. (2004). Party, constituency, and representation: Votes on abortion in the British House of Commons. Public Choice , 120 (1), 63–85. Google Scholar Becker, S. O., Fetzer, T., & Novy, D. (2017). Who voted for Brexit? A comprehensive district-level analysis. Economic Policy , 32 (92), 601–650. Google Scholar Benedetto, G., & Hix, S. (2007). The rejected, the ejected, and the dejected: Explaining government rebels in the 2001–2005 British House of Commons. Comparative Political Studies , 40 (7), 755–781. Google Scholar Bernholz, P., Schneider, F., Vaubel, R., & Vibert, F. (2004). An alternative constitutional treaty for the European Union. Public Choice , 118 (3–4), 451–468. Google Scholar Bertelli, A. M., & Dolan, R. M. (2009). The demand and supply of parliamentary policy advocacy: Evidence from UK health policy, 1997–2005. Government and Opposition , 44 (3), 219–242. Google Scholar Campbell, R., Cowley, P., Vivyan, N., & Wagner, M. (2019). Legislator dissent as a valence signal. British Journal of Political Science , 49 (1), 105–128. Google Scholar Carey, J. M. (2008). Legislative voting and accountability ., Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar Clarke, H., Whiteley, P., Borges, W., Sanders, D., & Stewart, M. (2016). Modelling the dynamics of support for a right-wing populist party: The case of UKIP. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties , 26 (2), 135–154. Google Scholar Clarke, H. D., Goodwin, M., & Whiteley, P. (2017). Brexit: Why Britain voted to leave the European Union . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar Crowe, E. (1986). The web of authority: Party loyalty and social control in the British House of Commons. Legislative Studies Quarterly , 11 (2), 161–185. Google Scholar Dewan, T., & Spirling, A. (2011). Strategic opposition and government cohesion in westminster democracies. The American Political Science Review , 105 (2), 337–358. Google Scholar Eggers, A. C., & Spirling, A. (2016). Party cohesion in Westminster systems: Inducements, replacement and discipline in the House of Commons, 1836–1910. British Journal of Political Science , 46 (3), 567–589. Google Scholar Eggers, A. C., & Spirling, A. (2018). The shadow cabinet in Westminster systems: Modeling opposition agenda setting in the House of Commons, 1832–1915. British Journal of Political Science , 48 (2), 343–367. Google Scholar Fetzer, T. (2019). Did austerity cause Brexit? American Economic Review . Forthcoming. Fidrmuc, J., Hulenyi, M., & Tunali, C. B. (2019). Can money buy EU love? European Journal of Political Economy ,. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2019.07.002 . Article Google Scholar Fox, S., & Pearce, S. (2018). The generational decay of Euroscepticism in the UK and the EU referendum. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties , 28 (1), 19–37. Google Scholar Gaines, B. J., & Garrett, G. (1993). The calculus of dissent: Party discipline in the British Labour government, 1974–1979. Political Behavior , 15 (2), 113–135. Google Scholar Hanretty, C. (2017). Areal interpolation and the UK’s referendum on EU membership. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties , 27 (4), 466–483. Google Scholar Heath, O., & Goodwin, M. (2017). The 2017 general election, Brexit and the return to two-party politics: An aggregate-level analysis of the result. The Political Quarterly , 88 (3), 345–358. Google Scholar Hix, S., Noury, A. G., & Roland, G. (2007). Democratic Politics in the European Parliament. Themes in European Governance . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar Johnston, R., Cowley, P., Pattie, C., & Stuart, M. (2002). Voting in the house or wooing the voters at home: Labour MPs and the 2001 general election campaign. The Journal of Legislative Studies , 8 (2), 9–22. Google Scholar Kam, C. J. (2009). Party discipline and parliamentary politics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar Kam, C. J. (2014). Party discipline. In S. Martin, T. Saalfeld, & K. W. Strom (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of legislative studies, Chapter 19 (pp. 1–21). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar Kauder, B., & Porafke, N. (2019). Conservative politicians and voting on same-sex marriage. German Economic Review . https://doi.org/10.1111/geer.12183 . Google Scholar Kauder, B., Potrafke, N., & Riem, M. (2017). Do parties punish MPs for voting against the party line? CESifo Economic Studies , 63 (3), 317–332. Google Scholar Kirkland, J. H., & Slapin, J. B. (2018). Roll call rebels: Strategic dissent in the United States and United Kingdom. Elements in American Politics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar Krehbiel, K. (1993). Where’s the party? British Journal of Political Science , 23 (2), 235–266. Google Scholar Lewis-Beck, M. S., & Stegmaier, M. (2013). The VP-function revisited: A survey of the literature on vote and popularity functions after over 40 years. Public Choice , 157 (3), 367–385. Google Scholar Longley, N. (1998). Legislative systems with absolute party discipline: Implications for the agency theory approach to the constituent-legislator link. Public Choice , 97 (1), 121–141. Google Scholar Mood, C. (2010). Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can do about it. European Sociological Review , 26 (1), 67–82. Google Scholar Morgenstern, S. (2003). Patterns of legislative politics: Roll-Call voting in Latin America and the United States . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar Muller, W., & Strom,  K. (1999). Policy, office, or votes? How political parties in Western Europe make hard decisions . Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Nannestad, P., & Paldam, M. (1994). The VP-function: A survey of the literature on vote and popularity functions after 25 years. Public Choice , 79 (3), 213–245. Google Scholar Pattie, C., Fieldhouse, E., & Johnston, R. J. (1994). The price of conscience: The electoral correlates and consequences of free votes and rebellions in the British House of Commons, 1987–92. British Journal of Political Science , 24 (3), 359–380. Google Scholar Ragusa, J. M. (2016). Partisan cohorts, polarization, and the Gingrich senators. American Politics Research , 44 (2), 296–325. Google Scholar Saiegh, S. M. (2011). Ruling by statute: How uncertainty and vote buying shape lawmaking . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar Schonhardt-Bailey, C. (2006). From the corn laws to free trade. Interests, ideas, and institutions in historical perspective . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar Sowemimo, M. (1996). The Conservative Party and European integration 1988–95. Party Politics , 2 (1), 77–97. Google Scholar Stratmann, T. (2006). Party-line voting and committee assignments in the German mixed-member system. In R. D. Congleton & B. Swedenborg (Eds.), Democratic constitutional design and public policy. Analysis and evidence, Chapter 4 (pp. 111–130). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar Vivyan, N., & Wagner, M. (2012). Do voters reward rebellion? The electoral accountability of MPs in Britain. European Journal of Political Research , 51 (2), 235–264. Google Scholar Zhang, A. (2018). New findings on key factors influencing the UK’s referendum on leaving the EU. World Development , 102 , 304–314. Google Scholar