đŸ•·ïž Crawler Inspector

URL Lookup

Direct Parameter Lookup

Raw Queries and Responses

1. Shard Calculation

Query:
Response:
Calculated Shard: 158 (from laksa003)

2. Crawled Status Check

Query:
Response:

3. Robots.txt Check

Query:
Response:

4. Spam/Ban Check

Query:
Response:

5. Seen Status Check

â„č Skipped - page is already crawled

📄
INDEXABLE
✅
CRAWLED
1 month ago
đŸ€–
ROBOTS ALLOWED

Page Info Filters

FilterStatusConditionDetails
HTTP statusPASSdownload_http_code = 200HTTP 200
Age cutoffPASSdownload_stamp > now() - 6 MONTH1.1 months ago
History dropPASSisNull(history_drop_reason)No drop reason
Spam/banPASSfh_dont_index != 1 AND ml_spam_score = 0ml_spam_score=0
CanonicalPASSmeta_canonical IS NULL OR = '' OR = src_unparsedNot set

Page Details

PropertyValue
URLhttps://factcheck.afp.com/photo-does-not-show-models-viral-distracted-boyfriend-meme
Last Crawled2026-03-17 09:54:53 (1 month ago)
First Indexed2021-03-23 13:26:23 (5 years ago)
HTTP Status Code200
Meta TitleThis photo does not show the models from the viral 'distracted boyfriend' meme | Fact Check
Meta DescriptionA picture of a man and two women attempting to recreate a viral meme has been shared thousands of times on Facebook, alongside claims that it shows the original models, only 10 years later. This is false: the recently-shared image was taken at the Museum of the Moving Image in New York and does not show the original people from the meme.
Meta Canonicalnull
Boilerpipe Text
Dark mode Choose language A picture of a man and two women attempting to recreate a viral meme has been shared thousands of times on Facebook, alongside claims that it shows the original models, only 10 years later. This is false: the recently-shared image was taken at the Museum of the Moving Image in New York and does not show the original people from the meme.  The claim is based on the now-famous  "distracted boyfriend" meme , which surfaced in 2017 and has become a frequent template for jokes. It  shows a man pursing his lips at a passing woman while his companion, presumably his girlfriend, looks at him in disgust. The original picture comes from a stockphoto site. The misleading post, shared more than 1,400 times here on Facebook, features a picture of three people recreating the "distracted boyfriend" scene. It claims those in the image are “the actual people from that meme, 10 years later!” A screenshot taken on March 17, 2020 showing the false post The Facebook claim originated here on Twitter , where it has been retweeted more than 250,000 times since it was posted on March 13, 2021. Other Facebook pages have shared it here , here and here . Stock photo AFP Fact Check studied digital time stamps and used a reverse image search to find the source of the original picture. We discovered it was uploaded by Antonio Guillem to iStock by Getty Images on November 2, 2015, with the description “disloyal man walking with his girlfriend and looking amazed at another seductive girl”. A further search for more information on Guillem led to this Wired.com interview where he confirmed his now-famous picture was taken in 2015 – not 10 years ago, as claimed. Recent image does not show original models This reply to the viral twee t disputed the claim with a link to a Reddit page where a user by the name of Charlie Todd confirmed three years ago that he was the man in the copycat photo. He said it had been shot at a “Know Your Meme” party at the Museum of the Moving Image in NYC (New York City). “They had a gallery of memes hanging on the wall,” Todd wrote. “I noticed my wife was wearing a red dress so I suggested she pose in front of the girl in the photo. While I was taking her picture someone came up to me and asked if I wanted to be in it, so I hopped in. Then the girl in blue walked up and said, ‘Hey! Let me be the other girl!’ The whole thing was spontaneous and random.” Todd’s story was corroborated by the host of the exhibition at the New York museum . In 2018, KnowYourMeme hosted a ”Two Decades Of Memes” event at the museum and inducted 10 memes into an informal Hall Of Fame. According to KnowYourMeme , a website which documents internet memes, Todd and his wife Cody Livingston recreated the “Distracted Boyfriend” scene in front of an enlargement of the original picture, while confirming that they were not the same people from the meme. The models who play the couple in the original image are identified only by their first names as “Laura and Mario” in an interview by New York Magazine here . You can read more about the evolution of the meme here . Copyright © AFP 2017-2026. Any commercial use of this content requires a subscription. Click here to find out more. Is there content that you would like AFP to fact-check? Get in touch. Contact us E-mail
Markdown
[Skip to main content](https://factcheck.afp.com/photo-does-not-show-models-viral-distracted-boyfriend-meme#main-content) [![Home](https://factcheck.afp.com/themes/custom/factuel/afp-logo-light.svg)](https://factcheck.afp.com/ "Home") [Fact Check](https://factcheck.afp.com/ "Home") - Search - [Contact](https://factcheck.afp.com/contact) Dark mode ##### Navigation principale - [Home](https://factcheck.afp.com/) - [About AFP](https://factcheck.afp.com/about-afp) - [How we work](https://factcheck.afp.com/How-we-work) - [Editorial & ethical standards](https://factcheck.afp.com/AFPs-editorial-and-ethical-standards) - [Fact-Checking Stylebook](https://factcheck.afp.com/afp-fact-checking-stylebook) - [Meet the team](https://factcheck.afp.com/Meet-team) - [Training](https://digitalcourses.afp.com/) - [Subscribe](https://www.afp.com/en/products/afp-fact-check?utm_source=AFP_Factuel&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ALL-PDT-202303-Factcheck&utm_content=Banner) - [Contact](https://factcheck.afp.com/Contact) - [Corrections](https://factcheck.afp.com/corrections) - [FactCRICIS](https://factcheck.afp.com/FactCRICIS) Choose language - Search - [Contact](https://factcheck.afp.com/contact) ## Primary tabs - [View](https://factcheck.afp.com/photo-does-not-show-models-viral-distracted-boyfriend-meme) [Toggle tabs as a menu](https://factcheck.afp.com/photo-does-not-show-models-viral-distracted-boyfriend-meme) - [Revisions](https://factcheck.afp.com/node/32419/revisions) Share: ![](https://factcheck.afp.com/sites/default/files/medias/factchecking/nigeria//factcheck-visual_1_7.png) # This photo does not show the models from the viral 'distracted boyfriend' meme - This article is more than four years old. - Published on March 22, 2021 at 15:31 - Updated on March 23, 2021 at 13:21 - 2 min read - By [Mayowa TIJANI](https://factcheck.afp.com/mayowa-tijani), [AFP Nigeria](https://factcheck.afp.com/afp-nigeria) A picture of a man and two women attempting to recreate a viral meme has been shared thousands of times on Facebook, alongside claims that it shows the original models, only 10 years later. This is false: the recently-shared image was taken at the Museum of the Moving Image in New York and does not show the original people from the meme. The claim is based on the now-famous ["distracted boyfriend" meme](https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/aug/30/the-team-that-made-the-distracted-boyfriend-meme-have-split-up), which surfaced in 2017 and has become a frequent template for jokes. It shows a man pursing his lips at a passing woman while his companion, presumably his girlfriend, looks at him in disgust. The original picture comes from a stockphoto site. The misleading post, shared more than 1,400 times [here](https://perma.cc/Q9QN-ZEXB?type=image) on Facebook, features a picture of three people recreating the "distracted boyfriend" scene. It claims those in the image are “the actual people from that meme, 10 years later!” Image ![](https://factcheck.afp.com/sites/default/files/styles/image_in_article/public/medias/factchecking/nigeria/meme_x.jpg?itok=aGmXAa6C) A screenshot taken on March 17, 2020 showing the false post The Facebook claim originated [here on Twitter](https://twitter.com/jdpoc/status/1370798098075824132), where it has been retweeted more than 250,000 times since it was posted on March 13, 2021. Other Facebook pages have shared it [here](https://perma.cc/7D9G-UWC5?type=image), [here](https://perma.cc/Y5P8-2M6N?type=image) and [here](https://perma.cc/97K5-WYLY?type=image). ### Stock photo AFP Fact Check studied digital time stamps and used a [reverse image search](https://factcheck.afp.com/how-do-reverse-image-search) to find the source of the original picture. We discovered it was [uploaded by Antonio Guillem](https://www.istockphoto.com/fr/photo/disloyal-homme-avec-sa-petite-amie-%C3%A0-la-recherche-dans-une-autre-fille-gm493656728-77018851) to iStock by Getty Images on November 2, 2015, with the description “disloyal man walking with his girlfriend and looking amazed at another seductive girl”. A further search for more information on Guillem led to this [Wired.com interview](https://www.wired.com/story/distracted-boyfriend-meme-photographer-interview/) where he confirmed his now-famous picture was taken in 2015 – not 10 years ago, as claimed. ### Recent image does not show original models This [reply to the viral twee](https://twitter.com/flashboy/status/1370830867740946443)t disputed the claim with a link to a Reddit page where a user by the name of [Charlie Todd](https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/9jvfoh/meta/e6uohkd/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=web2x&context=3) confirmed three years ago that he was the man in the copycat photo. He said it had been shot at a “Know Your Meme” party at the Museum of the Moving Image in NYC (New York City). “They had a gallery of memes hanging on the wall,” Todd wrote. “I noticed my wife was wearing a red dress so I suggested she pose in front of the girl in the photo. While I was taking her picture someone came up to me and asked if I wanted to be in it, so I hopped in. Then the girl in blue walked up and said, ‘Hey! Let me be the other girl!’ The whole thing was spontaneous and random.” Todd’s story was corroborated by the host of the exhibition at the [New York museum](http://www.movingimage.us/). In 2018, KnowYourMeme hosted a ”Two Decades Of Memes” event at the museum and inducted 10 memes into an informal Hall Of Fame. According to [KnowYourMeme](https://knowyourmeme.com/editorials/meme-review/this-is-not-a-picture-of-the-distracted-boyfriend-models-ten-years-later), a website which documents internet memes, Todd and his wife Cody Livingston recreated the “Distracted Boyfriend” scene in front of an enlargement of the original picture, while confirming that they were not the same people from the meme. The models who play the couple in the original image are identified only by their first names as “Laura and Mario” in an interview by New York Magazine [here](https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2017/08/disloyal-man-meme-models-laura-mario-antonio-guillem.html). You can read more about the evolution of the meme [here](https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/distracted-boyfriend). **Copyright © AFP 2017-2026.** Any commercial use of this content requires a subscription. Click [here](https://www.afp.com/en/products/afp-fact-check?utm_source=AFP_Factuel&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ALL-PDT-202303-Factcheck&utm_content=Banner) to find out more. Share: Is there content that you would like AFP to fact-check? Get in touch. Contact us - [E-mail](https://factcheck.afp.com/contact-0) [Next article](https://factcheck.afp.com/footage-rain-pouring-through-leaking-hospital-roof-was-filmed-ghana-not-kenya) [Previous article](https://factcheck.afp.com/video-shows-plane-used-drug-smuggling-and-seized-army-guatemala) [![Digital courses](https://factcheck.afp.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/600x200-en.png)](https://digitalcourses.afp.com/?utm_source=AFP_Factuel&utm_medium=Banner&utm_campaign=ALL-AWA-202202-PDT-_Google-launch&utm_content=Undefined) Fact Check [![](https://factcheck.afp.com/themes/custom/factuel/images/badgemaldita.png)](http://poynter.org/ifcn/) [![](https://factcheck.afp.com/themes/custom/factuel/images/badgeefcsn.png)](https://efcsn.com/) Contact us - [Contact](https://factcheck.afp.com/Contact) Follow us - [FaceBook](https://www.facebook.com/AFPFactCheck/) - [Twitter](https://twitter.com/AFPFactCheck) - [Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/afpfactcheck/) - [Terms of use](https://www.afp.com/en/terms-use) - [Privacy policy](https://www.afp.com/en/privacy-policy "Privacy policy") - [Legal information](https://www.afp.com/en/legal-information "Legal information") - [Cookie settings](https://factcheck.afp.com/Cookie-settings) **Copyright © AFP 2017-2026. All rights reserved.** Users can access and consult this website and use the share features available for personal, private, and non-commercial purposes. Any other use, in particular any reproduction, communication to the public or distribution of the content of this website, in whole or in part, for any other purpose and/or by any other means, without a specific licence agreement signed with AFP, is strictly prohibited. The subject matter depicted or included via links within the Fact Checking content is provided to the extent necessary for correct understanding of the verification of the information concerned. AFP has not obtained any rights from the authors or copyright owners of this third party content and shall incur no liability in this regard. AFP and its logo are registered trademarks.
Readable Markdown
[![Home](https://factcheck.afp.com/themes/custom/factuel/afp-logo-light.svg)](https://factcheck.afp.com/ "Home") Dark mode Choose language A picture of a man and two women attempting to recreate a viral meme has been shared thousands of times on Facebook, alongside claims that it shows the original models, only 10 years later. This is false: the recently-shared image was taken at the Museum of the Moving Image in New York and does not show the original people from the meme. The claim is based on the now-famous ["distracted boyfriend" meme](https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/aug/30/the-team-that-made-the-distracted-boyfriend-meme-have-split-up), which surfaced in 2017 and has become a frequent template for jokes. It shows a man pursing his lips at a passing woman while his companion, presumably his girlfriend, looks at him in disgust. The original picture comes from a stockphoto site. The misleading post, shared more than 1,400 times [here](https://perma.cc/Q9QN-ZEXB?type=image) on Facebook, features a picture of three people recreating the "distracted boyfriend" scene. It claims those in the image are “the actual people from that meme, 10 years later!” A screenshot taken on March 17, 2020 showing the false post The Facebook claim originated [here on Twitter](https://twitter.com/jdpoc/status/1370798098075824132), where it has been retweeted more than 250,000 times since it was posted on March 13, 2021. Other Facebook pages have shared it [here](https://perma.cc/7D9G-UWC5?type=image), [here](https://perma.cc/Y5P8-2M6N?type=image) and [here](https://perma.cc/97K5-WYLY?type=image). ### Stock photo AFP Fact Check studied digital time stamps and used a [reverse image search](https://factcheck.afp.com/how-do-reverse-image-search) to find the source of the original picture. We discovered it was [uploaded by Antonio Guillem](https://www.istockphoto.com/fr/photo/disloyal-homme-avec-sa-petite-amie-%C3%A0-la-recherche-dans-une-autre-fille-gm493656728-77018851) to iStock by Getty Images on November 2, 2015, with the description “disloyal man walking with his girlfriend and looking amazed at another seductive girl”. A further search for more information on Guillem led to this [Wired.com interview](https://www.wired.com/story/distracted-boyfriend-meme-photographer-interview/) where he confirmed his now-famous picture was taken in 2015 – not 10 years ago, as claimed. ### Recent image does not show original models This [reply to the viral twee](https://twitter.com/flashboy/status/1370830867740946443)t disputed the claim with a link to a Reddit page where a user by the name of [Charlie Todd](https://www.reddit.com/r/funny/comments/9jvfoh/meta/e6uohkd/?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=web2x&context=3) confirmed three years ago that he was the man in the copycat photo. He said it had been shot at a “Know Your Meme” party at the Museum of the Moving Image in NYC (New York City). “They had a gallery of memes hanging on the wall,” Todd wrote. “I noticed my wife was wearing a red dress so I suggested she pose in front of the girl in the photo. While I was taking her picture someone came up to me and asked if I wanted to be in it, so I hopped in. Then the girl in blue walked up and said, ‘Hey! Let me be the other girl!’ The whole thing was spontaneous and random.” Todd’s story was corroborated by the host of the exhibition at the [New York museum](http://www.movingimage.us/). In 2018, KnowYourMeme hosted a ”Two Decades Of Memes” event at the museum and inducted 10 memes into an informal Hall Of Fame. According to [KnowYourMeme](https://knowyourmeme.com/editorials/meme-review/this-is-not-a-picture-of-the-distracted-boyfriend-models-ten-years-later), a website which documents internet memes, Todd and his wife Cody Livingston recreated the “Distracted Boyfriend” scene in front of an enlargement of the original picture, while confirming that they were not the same people from the meme. The models who play the couple in the original image are identified only by their first names as “Laura and Mario” in an interview by New York Magazine [here](https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2017/08/disloyal-man-meme-models-laura-mario-antonio-guillem.html). You can read more about the evolution of the meme [here](https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/distracted-boyfriend). **Copyright © AFP 2017-2026.** Any commercial use of this content requires a subscription. Click [here](https://www.afp.com/en/products/afp-fact-check?utm_source=AFP_Factuel&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ALL-PDT-202303-Factcheck&utm_content=Banner) to find out more. Is there content that you would like AFP to fact-check? Get in touch. Contact us - [E-mail](https://factcheck.afp.com/contact-0)
Shard158 (laksa)
Root Hash12452430996784097958
Unparsed URLcom,afp!factcheck,/photo-does-not-show-models-viral-distracted-boyfriend-meme s443