🕷️ Crawler Inspector

URL Lookup

Direct Parameter Lookup

Raw Queries and Responses

1. Shard Calculation

Query:

Response:

Calculated Shard: 77 (from laksa028)

2. Crawled Status Check

Query:

curl -X POST \
  'http://laksa077.int.ahrefs:8124/' \
  -H 'Content-Type: text/plain' \
  -H 'X-ClickHouse-Database: crawler3' \
  -H 'Authorization: Basic YXBpOg==' \
  -d 'SELECT getAhrefsURLFromUnparsed(src_unparsed) AS found_url, ifNull(toUnixTimestamp(download_stamp), 0) AS crawl_time, ifNull(toUnixTimestamp(props_url_first_seen), 0) AS first_indexed_time, download_http_code AS http_code, src_unparsed AS src_unparsed, src_root_hash AS src_root_hash, history_drop_reason AS history_drop_reason, meta_title AS meta_title, meta_descriptions AS meta_descriptions, attrs_boilerpipe_text AS attrs_boilerpipe_text, attrs_markdown AS attrs_markdown, attrs_readable_markdown AS attrs_readable_markdown, meta_canonical AS meta_canonical FROM crawler3.page_info_local FINAL PREWHERE (src_root_hash, src_unparsed) IN ((getAhrefsRootHashFromUnparsed(getAhrefsUnparsedNoserviceFromURL(\'https://csferrie.medium.com/in-two-place-at-once-d0e02dc1e49\')), getAhrefsUnparsedNoserviceFromURL(\'https://csferrie.medium.com/in-two-place-at-once-d0e02dc1e49\'))) FORMAT JSONEachRow'

Response:

{"found_url":"https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/in-two-place-at-once-d0e02dc1e49","crawl_time":1776230594,"first_indexed_time":1680854599,"http_code":200,"src_unparsed":"com,medium!csferrie,\/in-two-place-at-once-d0e02dc1e49 s443","src_root_hash":"13179037029838926277","history_drop_reason":null,"meta_title":"In Two Place At Once. Unraveling the mystery of quantum… | by Chris Ferrie | Medium","meta_descriptions":["In Two Place At Once Unraveling the mystery of quantum superposition You often hear that quantum objects can be in superposition, meaning they can occupy multiple locations simultaneously. This …"],"attrs_boilerpipe_text":"Unraveling the mystery of quantum superposition\n8 min read\nMar 30, 2023\nPress enter or click to view image in full size\nYou often hear that quantum objects can be in superposition, meaning they can occupy multiple locations simultaneously. This concept has captured the imagination of many, leading to a plethora of pop culture references and misconceptions. To truly appreciate superposition, though, we must first examine what it really means, why the colloquial interpretation is problematic, and how the concept of information can help us grasp its true essence.\nQuantum Physics in 60 Seconds\nBefore diving into the intricacies of superposition and information, let’s take a moment to revisit the basics of quantum physics. Quantum physics, often used synonymously with quantum\nmechanics\nand quantum\ntheory\n, is the branch of science that humans use to describe the behavior of matter and energy at the smallest scales, such as atoms, electrons, and photons — and quite successfully so, I might add. Though, as we will soon discuss, the theory is now applied well beyond this regime.\nAt this microscopic level, the familiar and intuitive rules of classical physics that work well to describe our everyday experiences no longer apply. Instead, the particles and their interactions are governed by a set of new rules that were developed in the first half of the 20th century. The rules contain several counterintuitive principles, with names such as wave-particle duality, quantum entanglement, and, of course, superposition. But in repeating these things that are said about quantum physics, I’ve already sinned by suggesting it must be grounded and understood in terms of real physical things, which don’t exist in the way we are compelled to imagine them.\nThese principles defy our common sense and challenge our preconceived notions of reality, but they have been confirmed time and time again through rigorous experimentation. The field of quantum physics has its fingerprints on every scientific discovery and technological innovation since its inception. Without quantum physics, we would not know what we are made of, let alone what stars and galaxies are made of, nor would we understand the mechanisms of chemistry or biology and that DNA encodes the recipe to make what we are. Hell, without quantum physics, we wouldn’t even be able to accurately explain why the sky is blue. (It’s because air molecules have a quantum energy level structure tuned to higher visible frequencies causing them to absorb and emit more blue light, which is scattered in the sky, by the way.) Quantum physics has revolutionized our modern technology-infused world with innovations such as lasers, transistors, atomic clocks, and every medical scan you’ve ever had or seen on TV.\nIt’s been said in more ways than one that “nobody understands quantum physics.” Yet, here we are, using it to make the most accurate predictions ever made by humanity. The fact of the matter is many people understand quantum physics. The\nproblem\nis that, apparently, nobody can provide a genuinely honest and useful explanation of their understanding. Physicists resort to oversimplification and subtle analogies that ought to come with big disclaimers or not be used at all outside of academia. It’s not their fault, though, as we simply don’t have good language to discuss these things.\nPersonally, the concepts of\ninformation theory\nprovide me with a comfortable understanding of quantum physics. I’m going to share some aspects of it with you. Perhaps it’s not objectively “good,” but I think it’s much better than the way we have been doing it for almost a hundred years now. So without further ado, let’s start with the simplest “counterintuitive” concept in quantum physics.\nSuperposition: Splitting the Quantum and Classical World\nThe idea of superposition is central to quantum physics. It’s often oversimplified as particles existing in multiple locations at once. But that’s a bit like trying to explain a complex painting with a single brushstroke, without paint on it. In truth, superposition refers to the mathematical representation of a quantum object’s state. You can imagine a particular state as a spreadsheet filled with numbers that encode all the information required to predict the outcomes of experiments performed using that object. We often refer to objects as being “in” states, and that terminology is not limited to quantum physics.\nGet Chris Ferrie’s stories in your inbox\nJoin Medium for free to get updates from this writer.\nRemember me for faster sign in\nIt might be said that you are “in” a state of happiness. But this implies that happiness is a real objective thing or that states, in general, are objective things that objects transition through. But happiness is not objective. Happiness is really a shorthand concept for a bunch of expectations I should have for your actions, like that you will smile, laugh, and engage positively. Another abused two-letter word: is. We might ask, “what color\nis\nthe apple?” We definitely don’t say, “if white light shines on this apple, I will perceive what I have been told is the sensation of redness.” No, we just say the apple “is” red, even though red isn’t a real physical state. For our everyday experiences, this is unproblematic, though google “pink is not a color,” and you’ll see that it’s not hard to find pedantry in just about anything.\nQuantum states are also not objective things that particles pass through — they are mathematical tools that help us understand and predict the behavior of quantum objects in various situations.\nThere are basic states that predict intuitive things like, “if the position of the object is measured, it will definitely be found here” or “if the position of the object is measured, it will definitely be found there.” But, again, instead of writing out sentences that could quickly turn into paragraphs, we use a conceptual short-hand and say the object is “in” the state of being here or, simpler still, the object just “is” here, or there.\nIt’s important to keep in mind that states are mathematical objects. The state summarized as “object is here” is actually a spreadsheet of numbers, as is the state summarized as “object is\nthere\n.” Being made of numbers, we can easily imagine adding them together, giving us a new spreadsheet — a new state. This is a valid description of the object — it can be “in” this state. But what does this mean? Well, technically, nothing beyond what I’ve already said. This state is nothing but information that provides predictions for any experiment performed using the object.\nOf course, this is a deeply unsatisfying answer to you, as it has been to generations of physicists. It’s tempting to say that a superposition of the “here” and “there” states is a “here and there” state. Just as we simplified an object being described as “if the position of the object is measured, it will definitely be found here” to “the object is here,” most people simplify the superposition state to “the object is both here and there” — in two places at once! I hope you can see now that this is a ridiculous statement that could have been easily avoided had we not relied on oversimplified short-hand.\nNow is a good place to pause and reiterate that\nstates\nare mathematical objects we assign to phenomena that we use in our theories to make predictions. Sometimes the states can faithfully be interpreted through analogies to everyday experiences. We make copious use of these analogies as they provide enormous conceptual economy. However, many states have no direct connection to our everyday experience. Using the typical analogies then quickly results in nonsensical statements and confusion.\nTo be clear: an electron, say, is never “in two places at the same.” In fact, in such a superposition state, it is somewhat problematic to even be calling “it” an electron. Electrons are most often considered to be particles, which, if nothing else, have a definite location. The fact that electrons can be in superpositions of the “here” and “there” states forces us to revisit the idea that particles exist at all. There are no particles. There are only phenomena that occasionally behave “as if” they were particles. What\nis\nan electron in superposition, then? Information. Such a state provides information, heavily couched in the context of the rest of physics, that allows us to make accurate predictions about what will happen next.\nNow, if you have reductionist sympathies, you are likely open to the idea that\neverything\n, including the electron, the apple, and the state of happiness, is built up from billions upon billions of fundamental particles interacting according to the laws of physics. The universe is just a collection of particles arranged in various patterns, some of which happen to be very complex. But if I am just a collection of electrons and other particles, which can be in superposition states, why is it that I cannot? Why isn’t superposition a part of our day-to-day lives?\nDecoherence: Bridging Two Worlds\nWhen a quantum object is isolated, it can maintain its superposition state and exhibit all that strange and counterintuitive goodness we like to ascribe to the quantum world. However, as soon as it interacts with its surroundings, such as air molecules, dust particles, or even photons of light, it becomes\nentangled\nwith the environment, and the superposition quickly deteriorates. The more complex the object, the more interactions it has with its environment and the faster the decoherence process unfolds. For example, a dust grain, floating in the dead of space, as far as possible from anything else, including starlight, would cease to be in a superposition of two locations separated by the width of the grain in less than a second. This is the standard story of how the quantum world gives way to the classical world. The problem with this story is that it just waves more quantum jargon in your face. Entanglement? Who ordered that?\nImagine that dust grain again. Initially, suppose it is in one of the “object is here” states. Remember, this simple statement comes with a lot of implicit context. What it means is that if we were to perform an experiment that reveals the location of the dust grain, it would be found in one particular spot. Experiments and measurements are something we take for granted at human scales. One of the most confronting lessons quantum physics teaches us is that measurement requires some interaction with the object of investigation. It’s the context of that measurement that defines the possible outcomes that provide us with information.\nFor example, superpositions of “here” and “there” are not among the possible states that can be observed if we arrange to measure the position of the dust grain. There are measurements, called\ninterference experiments,\nthat do reveal superposition states, but they are not “position” measurements, and they would be extremely difficult to perform. As noted, such an experiment would at least require an environment more extreme than deep space. Perhaps we will one day perform one of these interference experiments with an object that can be seen with the naked eye. However, there would be absolutely no sense in asking what the superposition states “looks” like because “looking” would necessitate a position measurement, which, again, does not have superposition states as its possible outcomes. The only thing such an experiment would look like is data shown to you on a screen — just more information.\nIf the interactions between things and a dust grain did not provide information about its location, the superposition state would be maintained. However, the entire concept of location would also be irrelevant in such a situation. It’s the proliferation of location information that gives a “here and there” superposition state meaning and why it features in the theory at all. In effect, our everyday world is a collection of particles with locations because they all mutually encode position information of each other. If it were otherwise,\nwe\nwould not exist. Superposition is not miraculous. It’s the simple, classical “here” and “there” states that provide all the beauty and complexity of our experience. Quantum physics is really a theory about isolation, and it doesn’t apply to you — nor would you want it to.","attrs_markdown":"[Sitemap](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/sitemap\/sitemap.xml)\n\n[Open in app](https:\/\/play.google.com\/store\/apps\/details?id=com.medium.reader&referrer=utm_source%3DmobileNavBar&source=post_page---top_nav_layout_nav-----------------------------------------)\n\nSign up\n\n[Sign in](https:\/\/medium.com\/m\/signin?operation=login&redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fcsferrie.medium.com%2Fin-two-place-at-once-d0e02dc1e49&source=post_page---top_nav_layout_nav-----------------------global_nav------------------)\n\n[Medium Logo](https:\/\/medium.com\/?source=post_page---top_nav_layout_nav-----------------------------------------)\n\nGet app\n\n[Write](https:\/\/medium.com\/m\/signin?operation=register&redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fmedium.com%2Fnew-story&source=---top_nav_layout_nav-----------------------new_post_topnav------------------)\n\n[Search](https:\/\/medium.com\/search?source=post_page---top_nav_layout_nav-----------------------------------------)\n\nSign up\n\n[Sign in](https:\/\/medium.com\/m\/signin?operation=login&redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fcsferrie.medium.com%2Fin-two-place-at-once-d0e02dc1e49&source=post_page---top_nav_layout_nav-----------------------global_nav------------------)\n\n![](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fill:32:32\/1*dmbNkD5D-u45r44go_cf0g.png)\n\nTop highlight\n\n# In Two Place At Once\n## Unraveling the mystery of quantum superposition\n[![Chris Ferrie](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fill:32:32\/1*uKcuUivFSLmwMdee17B3nQ.jpeg)](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/?source=post_page---byline--d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------)\n\n[Chris Ferrie](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/?source=post_page---byline--d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------)\n\nFollow\n\n8 min read\n\n·\n\nMar 30, 2023\n\n365\n\n6\n\n[Listen](https:\/\/medium.com\/m\/signin?actionUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fmedium.com%2Fplans%3Fdimension%3Dpost_audio_button%26postId%3Dd0e02dc1e49&operation=register&redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fcsferrie.medium.com%2Fin-two-place-at-once-d0e02dc1e49&source=---header_actions--d0e02dc1e49---------------------post_audio_button------------------)\n\nShare\n\nPress enter or click to view image in full size\n\n![](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fit:700\/0*4VvoTpDYOqZf6Y5t)\n\nYou often hear that quantum objects can be in superposition, meaning they can occupy multiple locations simultaneously. This concept has captured the imagination of many, leading to a plethora of pop culture references and misconceptions. To truly appreciate superposition, though, we must first examine what it really means, why the colloquial interpretation is problematic, and how the concept of information can help us grasp its true essence.\n\n## Quantum Physics in 60 Seconds\nBefore diving into the intricacies of superposition and information, let’s take a moment to revisit the basics of quantum physics. Quantum physics, often used synonymously with quantum *mechanics* and quantum *theory*, is the branch of science that humans use to describe the behavior of matter and energy at the smallest scales, such as atoms, electrons, and photons — and quite successfully so, I might add. Though, as we will soon discuss, the theory is now applied well beyond this regime.\n\nAt this microscopic level, the familiar and intuitive rules of classical physics that work well to describe our everyday experiences no longer apply. Instead, the particles and their interactions are governed by a set of new rules that were developed in the first half of the 20th century. The rules contain several counterintuitive principles, with names such as wave-particle duality, quantum entanglement, and, of course, superposition. But in repeating these things that are said about quantum physics, I’ve already sinned by suggesting it must be grounded and understood in terms of real physical things, which don’t exist in the way we are compelled to imagine them.\n\nThese principles defy our common sense and challenge our preconceived notions of reality, but they have been confirmed time and time again through rigorous experimentation. The field of quantum physics has its fingerprints on every scientific discovery and technological innovation since its inception. Without quantum physics, we would not know what we are made of, let alone what stars and galaxies are made of, nor would we understand the mechanisms of chemistry or biology and that DNA encodes the recipe to make what we are. Hell, without quantum physics, we wouldn’t even be able to accurately explain why the sky is blue. (It’s because air molecules have a quantum energy level structure tuned to higher visible frequencies causing them to absorb and emit more blue light, which is scattered in the sky, by the way.) Quantum physics has revolutionized our modern technology-infused world with innovations such as lasers, transistors, atomic clocks, and every medical scan you’ve ever had or seen on TV.\n\nIt’s been said in more ways than one that “nobody understands quantum physics.” Yet, here we are, using it to make the most accurate predictions ever made by humanity. The fact of the matter is many people understand quantum physics. The *problem* is that, apparently, nobody can provide a genuinely honest and useful explanation of their understanding. Physicists resort to oversimplification and subtle analogies that ought to come with big disclaimers or not be used at all outside of academia. It’s not their fault, though, as we simply don’t have good language to discuss these things.\n\nPersonally, the concepts of *information theory* provide me with a comfortable understanding of quantum physics. I’m going to share some aspects of it with you. Perhaps it’s not objectively “good,” but I think it’s much better than the way we have been doing it for almost a hundred years now. So without further ado, let’s start with the simplest “counterintuitive” concept in quantum physics.\n\n## Superposition: Splitting the Quantum and Classical World\nThe idea of superposition is central to quantum physics. It’s often oversimplified as particles existing in multiple locations at once. But that’s a bit like trying to explain a complex painting with a single brushstroke, without paint on it. In truth, superposition refers to the mathematical representation of a quantum object’s state. You can imagine a particular state as a spreadsheet filled with numbers that encode all the information required to predict the outcomes of experiments performed using that object. We often refer to objects as being “in” states, and that terminology is not limited to quantum physics.\n\n## Get Chris Ferrie’s stories in your inbox\nJoin Medium for free to get updates from this writer.\n\nSubscribe\n\nSubscribe\n\nRemember me for faster sign in\n\nIt might be said that you are “in” a state of happiness. But this implies that happiness is a real objective thing or that states, in general, are objective things that objects transition through. But happiness is not objective. Happiness is really a shorthand concept for a bunch of expectations I should have for your actions, like that you will smile, laugh, and engage positively. Another abused two-letter word: is. We might ask, “what color *is* the apple?” We definitely don’t say, “if white light shines on this apple, I will perceive what I have been told is the sensation of redness.” No, we just say the apple “is” red, even though red isn’t a real physical state. For our everyday experiences, this is unproblematic, though google “pink is not a color,” and you’ll see that it’s not hard to find pedantry in just about anything.\n\n*Quantum states are also not objective things that particles pass through — they are mathematical tools that help us understand and predict the behavior of quantum objects in various situations.* There are basic states that predict intuitive things like, “if the position of the object is measured, it will definitely be found here” or “if the position of the object is measured, it will definitely be found there.” But, again, instead of writing out sentences that could quickly turn into paragraphs, we use a conceptual short-hand and say the object is “in” the state of being here or, simpler still, the object just “is” here, or there.\n\nIt’s important to keep in mind that states are mathematical objects. The state summarized as “object is here” is actually a spreadsheet of numbers, as is the state summarized as “object is *there*.” Being made of numbers, we can easily imagine adding them together, giving us a new spreadsheet — a new state. This is a valid description of the object — it can be “in” this state. But what does this mean? Well, technically, nothing beyond what I’ve already said. This state is nothing but information that provides predictions for any experiment performed using the object.\n\nOf course, this is a deeply unsatisfying answer to you, as it has been to generations of physicists. It’s tempting to say that a superposition of the “here” and “there” states is a “here and there” state. Just as we simplified an object being described as “if the position of the object is measured, it will definitely be found here” to “the object is here,” most people simplify the superposition state to “the object is both here and there” — in two places at once! I hope you can see now that this is a ridiculous statement that could have been easily avoided had we not relied on oversimplified short-hand.\n\nNow is a good place to pause and reiterate that *states* are mathematical objects we assign to phenomena that we use in our theories to make predictions. Sometimes the states can faithfully be interpreted through analogies to everyday experiences. We make copious use of these analogies as they provide enormous conceptual economy. However, many states have no direct connection to our everyday experience. Using the typical analogies then quickly results in nonsensical statements and confusion.\n\nTo be clear: an electron, say, is never “in two places at the same.” In fact, in such a superposition state, it is somewhat problematic to even be calling “it” an electron. Electrons are most often considered to be particles, which, if nothing else, have a definite location. The fact that electrons can be in superpositions of the “here” and “there” states forces us to revisit the idea that particles exist at all. There are no particles. There are only phenomena that occasionally behave “as if” they were particles. What *is* an electron in superposition, then? Information. Such a state provides information, heavily couched in the context of the rest of physics, that allows us to make accurate predictions about what will happen next.\n\nNow, if you have reductionist sympathies, you are likely open to the idea that *everything*, including the electron, the apple, and the state of happiness, is built up from billions upon billions of fundamental particles interacting according to the laws of physics. The universe is just a collection of particles arranged in various patterns, some of which happen to be very complex. But if I am just a collection of electrons and other particles, which can be in superposition states, why is it that I cannot? Why isn’t superposition a part of our day-to-day lives?\n\n## Decoherence: Bridging Two Worlds\nWhen a quantum object is isolated, it can maintain its superposition state and exhibit all that strange and counterintuitive goodness we like to ascribe to the quantum world. However, as soon as it interacts with its surroundings, such as air molecules, dust particles, or even photons of light, it becomes *entangled* with the environment, and the superposition quickly deteriorates. The more complex the object, the more interactions it has with its environment and the faster the decoherence process unfolds. For example, a dust grain, floating in the dead of space, as far as possible from anything else, including starlight, would cease to be in a superposition of two locations separated by the width of the grain in less than a second. This is the standard story of how the quantum world gives way to the classical world. The problem with this story is that it just waves more quantum jargon in your face. Entanglement? Who ordered that?\n\nImagine that dust grain again. Initially, suppose it is in one of the “object is here” states. Remember, this simple statement comes with a lot of implicit context. What it means is that if we were to perform an experiment that reveals the location of the dust grain, it would be found in one particular spot. Experiments and measurements are something we take for granted at human scales. One of the most confronting lessons quantum physics teaches us is that measurement requires some interaction with the object of investigation. It’s the context of that measurement that defines the possible outcomes that provide us with information.\n\nFor example, superpositions of “here” and “there” are not among the possible states that can be observed if we arrange to measure the position of the dust grain. There are measurements, called *interference experiments,* that do reveal superposition states, but they are not “position” measurements, and they would be extremely difficult to perform. As noted, such an experiment would at least require an environment more extreme than deep space. Perhaps we will one day perform one of these interference experiments with an object that can be seen with the naked eye. However, there would be absolutely no sense in asking what the superposition states “looks” like because “looking” would necessitate a position measurement, which, again, does not have superposition states as its possible outcomes. The only thing such an experiment would look like is data shown to you on a screen — just more information.\n\nIf the interactions between things and a dust grain did not provide information about its location, the superposition state would be maintained. However, the entire concept of location would also be irrelevant in such a situation. It’s the proliferation of location information that gives a “here and there” superposition state meaning and why it features in the theory at all. In effect, our everyday world is a collection of particles with locations because they all mutually encode position information of each other. If it were otherwise, *we* would not exist. Superposition is not miraculous. It’s the simple, classical “here” and “there” states that provide all the beauty and complexity of our experience. Quantum physics is really a theory about isolation, and it doesn’t apply to you — nor would you want it to.\n\n[Quantum Physics](https:\/\/medium.com\/tag\/quantum-physics?source=post_page-----d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------)\n\n[Superposition](https:\/\/medium.com\/tag\/superposition?source=post_page-----d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------)\n\n[Metaphysics](https:\/\/medium.com\/tag\/metaphysics?source=post_page-----d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------)\n\n[Philosophy](https:\/\/medium.com\/tag\/philosophy?source=post_page-----d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------)\n\n[Reality](https:\/\/medium.com\/tag\/reality?source=post_page-----d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------)\n\n365\n\n365\n\n6\n\n[![Chris Ferrie](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fill:48:48\/1*uKcuUivFSLmwMdee17B3nQ.jpeg)](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/?source=post_page---post_author_info--d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------)\n\n[![Chris Ferrie](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fill:64:64\/1*uKcuUivFSLmwMdee17B3nQ.jpeg)](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/?source=post_page---post_author_info--d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------)\n\nFollow\n\n[Written by Chris Ferrie](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/?source=post_page---post_author_info--d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------)\n\n[9\\.7K followers](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/followers?source=post_page---post_author_info--d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------)\n\n·[25 following](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/following?source=post_page---post_author_info--d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------)\n\nQuantum theorist by day, father by night. Occasionally moonlighting as a author. [csferrie.com](http:\/\/csferrie.com\/)\n\nFollow\n\n## Responses (6)\n![](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fill:32:32\/1*dmbNkD5D-u45r44go_cf0g.png)\n\nWrite a response\n\n[What are your thoughts?](https:\/\/medium.com\/m\/signin?operation=register&redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fcsferrie.medium.com%2Fin-two-place-at-once-d0e02dc1e49&source=---post_responses--d0e02dc1e49---------------------respond_sidebar------------------)\n\nCancel\n\nRespond\n\n[![Chris Ferrie](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fill:32:32\/1*uKcuUivFSLmwMdee17B3nQ.jpeg)](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/?source=post_page---post_responses--d0e02dc1e49----0-----------------------------------)\n\n[Chris Ferrie](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/?source=post_page---post_responses--d0e02dc1e49----0-----------------------------------)\n\nAuthor\n\n[Apr 4, 2023](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/you-can-perfectly-emulate-a-quantum-computer-e-g-a8ed0bd849e?source=post_page---post_responses--d0e02dc1e49----0-----------------------------------)\n```\nYou can perfectly emulate a quantum computer (e.g., https:\/\/algassert.com\/quirk) yourself. In doing so, you will \"achieve\" superpositions and entanglement and even do quantum computations.The goal of quantum computing, as a discipline today, is to… more\n```\n3\n\n1 reply\n\nReply\n\n[![Андрей Шляховой](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fill:32:32\/1*1bnn-WqMca-AG03h2RZWpw.jpeg)](https:\/\/medium.com\/@andrey.shlyakhovoy?source=post_page---post_responses--d0e02dc1e49----1-----------------------------------)\n\n[Андрей Шляховой](https:\/\/medium.com\/@andrey.shlyakhovoy?source=post_page---post_responses--d0e02dc1e49----1-----------------------------------)\n\n[Sep 2, 2025](https:\/\/medium.com\/@andrey.shlyakhovoy\/a-fascinating-read-b6d6c20fcbee?source=post_page---post_responses--d0e02dc1e49----1-----------------------------------)\n```\nA fascinating read. While quantum mechanics might seem far removed from finance and business, I see strong parallels in decision-making under uncertainty. Much like particles in superposition, leaders often have to operate in multiple “realities” at… more\n```\n3\n\nReply\n\n[![Poganystefano](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fill:32:32\/0*mUr953gPesg0n4Bx)](https:\/\/medium.com\/@poganystefano?source=post_page---post_responses--d0e02dc1e49----2-----------------------------------)\n\n[Poganystefano](https:\/\/medium.com\/@poganystefano?source=post_page---post_responses--d0e02dc1e49----2-----------------------------------)\n\n[Aug 31, 2024](https:\/\/medium.com\/@poganystefano\/again-very-nice-article-8caab9c680fc?source=post_page---post_responses--d0e02dc1e49----2-----------------------------------)\n```\nAgain, very nice article!\n```\n3\n\nReply\n\nSee all responses\n\n## More from Chris Ferrie\n![Quantum entanglement is far stranger than you’ve been told](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fit:679\/format:webp\/0*GyhOXq_eVRLe7_ir)\n\n[![Chris Ferrie](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fill:20:20\/1*uKcuUivFSLmwMdee17B3nQ.jpeg)](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----0---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------)\n\n[Chris Ferrie](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----0---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------)\n\n[Quantum entanglement is far stranger than you’ve been toldQuantum entanglement. What the hell is it? Perhaps you’ve read that](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/quantum-entanglement-is-far-stranger-than-youve-been-told-60a060228ee0?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----0---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------)\n\nMar 14\n\n[A clap icon 1.6KA response icon 57](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/quantum-entanglement-is-far-stranger-than-youve-been-told-60a060228ee0?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----0---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------)\n\n![Why is no one taught the one concept in quantum physics that denies reality?](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fit:679\/format:webp\/0*7UyonxvThJLT2HHK)\n\n[![Chris Ferrie](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fill:20:20\/1*uKcuUivFSLmwMdee17B3nQ.jpeg)](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----1---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------)\n\n[Chris Ferrie](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----1---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------)\n\n[Why is no one taught the one concept in quantum physics that denies reality?It’s called contextuality, and it is the essence of quantum physics.](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/why-is-no-one-taught-the-one-concept-in-quantum-physics-that-denies-reality-070dd63449ca?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----1---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------)\n\nJan 30\n\n[A clap icon 1.5KA response icon 50](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/why-is-no-one-taught-the-one-concept-in-quantum-physics-that-denies-reality-070dd63449ca?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----1---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------)\n\n![Thanos Was Wrong… Because He Didn’t Do The Math](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fit:679\/format:webp\/0*iafwrCe7MT6jJObk)\n\n[![Chris Ferrie](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fill:20:20\/1*uKcuUivFSLmwMdee17B3nQ.jpeg)](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----2---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------)\n\n[Chris Ferrie](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----2---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------)\n\n[Thanos Was Wrong… Because He Didn’t Do The Math(And what it teaches you about why no one understands inflation)](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/thanos-was-wrong-because-he-didnt-do-the-math-29257204cf4c?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----2---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------)\n\nApr 4\n\n[A clap icon 401A response icon 14](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/thanos-was-wrong-because-he-didnt-do-the-math-29257204cf4c?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----2---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------)\n\n![Quantum Reality Is Not Really Real, But It’s Real Enough](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fit:679\/format:webp\/0*iRaDmoUNbLZUaLoY)\n\n[![Chris Ferrie](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fill:20:20\/1*uKcuUivFSLmwMdee17B3nQ.jpeg)](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----3---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------)\n\n[Chris Ferrie](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----3---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------)\n\n[Quantum Reality Is Not Really Real, But It’s Real EnoughThe universe is out there, doing its own thing, whether we are looking at it or not.](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/quantum-reality-is-not-really-real-but-its-real-enough-e2f47b21a37e?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----3---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------)\n\nMar 30\n\n[A clap icon 182A response icon 11](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/quantum-reality-is-not-really-real-but-its-real-enough-e2f47b21a37e?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----3---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------)\n\n[See all from Chris Ferrie](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------)\n\n## Recommended from Medium\n![Quantum entanglement is far stranger than you’ve been told](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fit:679\/format:webp\/0*GyhOXq_eVRLe7_ir)\n\n[![Chris Ferrie](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fill:20:20\/1*uKcuUivFSLmwMdee17B3nQ.jpeg)](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----0---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------)\n\n[Chris Ferrie](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----0---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------)\n\n[Quantum entanglement is far stranger than you’ve been toldQuantum entanglement. What the hell is it? Perhaps you’ve read that](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/quantum-entanglement-is-far-stranger-than-youve-been-told-60a060228ee0?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----0---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------)\n\nMar 14\n\n[A clap icon 1.6KA response icon 57](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/quantum-entanglement-is-far-stranger-than-youve-been-told-60a060228ee0?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----0---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------)\n\n![Two men sitting at a table, one with a high cognitive load (in red) and the other with no cognitive load (in blue), indicating truth.](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fit:679\/format:webp\/1*YKkw7AkAY2KS6m5_L1JtRA.png)\n\n[![E³ — Entertain Enlighten Empower](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fill:20:20\/1*h_6wWa6j1p0REtXY7wuRGQ.png)](https:\/\/medium.com\/the-springboard?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----1---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------)\n\nIn\n\n[E³ — Entertain Enlighten Empower](https:\/\/medium.com\/the-springboard?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----1---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------)\n\nby\n\n[Joshua Mason](https:\/\/medium.com\/@iamjoshmason?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----1---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------)\n\n[How to Spot a Liar in 3 Questions (Without Them Knowing)The secret to detecting deception isn’t about body language — it’s about “Cognitive Load.”](https:\/\/medium.com\/@iamjoshmason\/how-to-spot-a-liar-in-3-questions-without-them-knowing-58c77069ef9b?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----1---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------)\n\nDec 11, 2025\n\n[A clap icon 23KA response icon 533](https:\/\/medium.com\/@iamjoshmason\/how-to-spot-a-liar-in-3-questions-without-them-knowing-58c77069ef9b?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----1---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------)\n\n![The Church’s Obsession With Sexual Sin Is Historically Weird](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fit:679\/format:webp\/1*TVZbengiE1ilwlQDCOFuWQ.jpeg)\n\n[![Backyard Church](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fill:20:20\/1*AcPwoVqPHxkKZJZSH5T3QQ.png)](https:\/\/medium.com\/backyard-theology?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----0---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------)\n\nIn\n\n[Backyard Church](https:\/\/medium.com\/backyard-theology?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----0---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------)\n\nby\n\n[Dan Foster](https:\/\/danfosterwriter.medium.com\/?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----0---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------)\n\n[The Church’s Obsession With Sexual Sin Is Historically WeirdHow early Christians ranked sins very differently from modern evangelicals](https:\/\/danfosterwriter.medium.com\/the-churchs-obsession-with-sexual-sin-is-historically-weird-96c02011522a?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----0---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------)\n\nFeb 13\n\n[A clap icon 3.6KA response icon 118](https:\/\/danfosterwriter.medium.com\/the-churchs-obsession-with-sexual-sin-is-historically-weird-96c02011522a?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----0---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------)\n\n![Four Cool Japanese Home Appliances the World Hasn’t Discovered Yet](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fit:679\/format:webp\/0*k-zFF3cj2IV5zfmu.jpeg)\n\n[![New East](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fill:20:20\/1*tdHjTa20spnGWxA3kuI9lA.jpeg)](https:\/\/medium.com\/new-east?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----1---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------)\n\nIn\n\n[New East](https:\/\/medium.com\/new-east?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----1---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------)\n\nby\n\n[Yuri Minamide](https:\/\/medium.com\/@yuriminamide0509?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----1---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------)\n\n[Four Cool Japanese Home Appliances the World Hasn’t Discovered YetYou might end up wanting one or two of them](https:\/\/medium.com\/@yuriminamide0509\/four-cool-japanese-home-appliances-the-world-hasnt-discovered-yet-fbb82793d894?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----1---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------)\n\nFeb 20\n\n[A clap icon 4KA response icon 63](https:\/\/medium.com\/@yuriminamide0509\/four-cool-japanese-home-appliances-the-world-hasnt-discovered-yet-fbb82793d894?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----1---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------)\n\n![A futuristic 3D visualization of two massive data centers — one blue for Microsoft and one purple\/green for OpenAI — separated by a glowing orange tectonic crack and severed fiber optic cables.](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fit:679\/format:webp\/1*rRInK1ARZKPmpBnF4fxLKw.png)\n\n[![ILLUMINATION](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fill:20:20\/1*AZxiin1Cvws3J0TwNUP2sQ.png)](https:\/\/medium.com\/illumination?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----2---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------)\n\nIn\n\n[ILLUMINATION](https:\/\/medium.com\/illumination?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----2---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------)\n\nby\n\n[Somya Golchha](https:\/\/medium.com\/@jainsomya2510?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----2---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------)\n\n[The Microsoft-OpenAI Divorce Is Official: Inside the \\$250 Billion BetrayalGPT-5 is already being retired, and Satya Nadella just made his move. The “partnership” of the century is entering its terminal phase.](https:\/\/medium.com\/@jainsomya2510\/the-microsoft-openai-divorce-is-official-inside-the-250-billion-betrayal-822073eba64e?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----2---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------)\n\nFeb 18\n\n[A clap icon 4.1KA response icon 102](https:\/\/medium.com\/@jainsomya2510\/the-microsoft-openai-divorce-is-official-inside-the-250-billion-betrayal-822073eba64e?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----2---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------)\n\n![4 MORE Major Lies Christians Tell About Jesus](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fit:679\/format:webp\/1*Kk0x9-HwYToZFcNPr-4tOA.jpeg)\n\n[![Andrew Springer](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fill:20:20\/1*1bNWMmScAu5tNyd0sf8qdw@2x.jpeg)](https:\/\/andrewspringer.medium.com\/?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----3---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------)\n\n[Andrew Springer](https:\/\/andrewspringer.medium.com\/?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----3---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------)\n\n[4 MORE Major Lies Christians Tell About JesusA couple of weeks ago, I wrote an essay for The Jesus Movement that laid out four major lies Christians tell about Jesus. The response to…](https:\/\/andrewspringer.medium.com\/4-more-major-lies-christians-tell-about-jesus-b3048bc49ae4?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----3---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------)\n\nFeb 15\n\n[A clap icon 1.3KA response icon 44](https:\/\/andrewspringer.medium.com\/4-more-major-lies-christians-tell-about-jesus-b3048bc49ae4?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----3---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------)\n\n[See more recommendations](https:\/\/medium.com\/?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------)\n\n[Help](https:\/\/help.medium.com\/hc\/en-us?source=post_page-----d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------)\n\n[Status](https:\/\/status.medium.com\/?source=post_page-----d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------)\n\n[About](https:\/\/medium.com\/about?autoplay=1&source=post_page-----d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------)\n\n[Careers](https:\/\/medium.com\/jobs-at-medium\/work-at-medium-959d1a85284e?source=post_page-----d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------)\n\n[Press](mailto:pressinquiries@medium.com)\n\n[Blog](https:\/\/blog.medium.com\/?source=post_page-----d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------)\n\n[Privacy](https:\/\/policy.medium.com\/medium-privacy-policy-f03bf92035c9?source=post_page-----d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------)\n\n[Rules](https:\/\/policy.medium.com\/medium-rules-30e5502c4eb4?source=post_page-----d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------)\n\n[Terms](https:\/\/policy.medium.com\/medium-terms-of-service-9db0094a1e0f?source=post_page-----d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------)\n\n[Text to speech](https:\/\/speechify.com\/medium?source=post_page-----d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------)","attrs_readable_markdown":"## Unraveling the mystery of quantum superposition\n[![Chris Ferrie](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fill:32:32\/1*uKcuUivFSLmwMdee17B3nQ.jpeg)](https:\/\/csferrie.medium.com\/?source=post_page---byline--d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------)\n\n8 min read Mar 30, 2023\n\nPress enter or click to view image in full size\n\n![](https:\/\/miro.medium.com\/v2\/resize:fit:700\/0*4VvoTpDYOqZf6Y5t)\n\nYou often hear that quantum objects can be in superposition, meaning they can occupy multiple locations simultaneously. This concept has captured the imagination of many, leading to a plethora of pop culture references and misconceptions. To truly appreciate superposition, though, we must first examine what it really means, why the colloquial interpretation is problematic, and how the concept of information can help us grasp its true essence.\n\n## Quantum Physics in 60 Seconds\nBefore diving into the intricacies of superposition and information, let’s take a moment to revisit the basics of quantum physics. Quantum physics, often used synonymously with quantum *mechanics* and quantum *theory*, is the branch of science that humans use to describe the behavior of matter and energy at the smallest scales, such as atoms, electrons, and photons — and quite successfully so, I might add. Though, as we will soon discuss, the theory is now applied well beyond this regime.\n\nAt this microscopic level, the familiar and intuitive rules of classical physics that work well to describe our everyday experiences no longer apply. Instead, the particles and their interactions are governed by a set of new rules that were developed in the first half of the 20th century. The rules contain several counterintuitive principles, with names such as wave-particle duality, quantum entanglement, and, of course, superposition. But in repeating these things that are said about quantum physics, I’ve already sinned by suggesting it must be grounded and understood in terms of real physical things, which don’t exist in the way we are compelled to imagine them.\n\nThese principles defy our common sense and challenge our preconceived notions of reality, but they have been confirmed time and time again through rigorous experimentation. The field of quantum physics has its fingerprints on every scientific discovery and technological innovation since its inception. Without quantum physics, we would not know what we are made of, let alone what stars and galaxies are made of, nor would we understand the mechanisms of chemistry or biology and that DNA encodes the recipe to make what we are. Hell, without quantum physics, we wouldn’t even be able to accurately explain why the sky is blue. (It’s because air molecules have a quantum energy level structure tuned to higher visible frequencies causing them to absorb and emit more blue light, which is scattered in the sky, by the way.) Quantum physics has revolutionized our modern technology-infused world with innovations such as lasers, transistors, atomic clocks, and every medical scan you’ve ever had or seen on TV.\n\nIt’s been said in more ways than one that “nobody understands quantum physics.” Yet, here we are, using it to make the most accurate predictions ever made by humanity. The fact of the matter is many people understand quantum physics. The *problem* is that, apparently, nobody can provide a genuinely honest and useful explanation of their understanding. Physicists resort to oversimplification and subtle analogies that ought to come with big disclaimers or not be used at all outside of academia. It’s not their fault, though, as we simply don’t have good language to discuss these things.\n\nPersonally, the concepts of *information theory* provide me with a comfortable understanding of quantum physics. I’m going to share some aspects of it with you. Perhaps it’s not objectively “good,” but I think it’s much better than the way we have been doing it for almost a hundred years now. So without further ado, let’s start with the simplest “counterintuitive” concept in quantum physics.\n\n## Superposition: Splitting the Quantum and Classical World\nThe idea of superposition is central to quantum physics. It’s often oversimplified as particles existing in multiple locations at once. But that’s a bit like trying to explain a complex painting with a single brushstroke, without paint on it. In truth, superposition refers to the mathematical representation of a quantum object’s state. You can imagine a particular state as a spreadsheet filled with numbers that encode all the information required to predict the outcomes of experiments performed using that object. We often refer to objects as being “in” states, and that terminology is not limited to quantum physics.\n\nGet Chris Ferrie’s stories in your inbox\n\nJoin Medium for free to get updates from this writer.\n\nRemember me for faster sign in\n\nIt might be said that you are “in” a state of happiness. But this implies that happiness is a real objective thing or that states, in general, are objective things that objects transition through. But happiness is not objective. Happiness is really a shorthand concept for a bunch of expectations I should have for your actions, like that you will smile, laugh, and engage positively. Another abused two-letter word: is. We might ask, “what color *is* the apple?” We definitely don’t say, “if white light shines on this apple, I will perceive what I have been told is the sensation of redness.” No, we just say the apple “is” red, even though red isn’t a real physical state. For our everyday experiences, this is unproblematic, though google “pink is not a color,” and you’ll see that it’s not hard to find pedantry in just about anything.\n\n*Quantum states are also not objective things that particles pass through — they are mathematical tools that help us understand and predict the behavior of quantum objects in various situations.* There are basic states that predict intuitive things like, “if the position of the object is measured, it will definitely be found here” or “if the position of the object is measured, it will definitely be found there.” But, again, instead of writing out sentences that could quickly turn into paragraphs, we use a conceptual short-hand and say the object is “in” the state of being here or, simpler still, the object just “is” here, or there.\n\nIt’s important to keep in mind that states are mathematical objects. The state summarized as “object is here” is actually a spreadsheet of numbers, as is the state summarized as “object is *there*.” Being made of numbers, we can easily imagine adding them together, giving us a new spreadsheet — a new state. This is a valid description of the object — it can be “in” this state. But what does this mean? Well, technically, nothing beyond what I’ve already said. This state is nothing but information that provides predictions for any experiment performed using the object.\n\nOf course, this is a deeply unsatisfying answer to you, as it has been to generations of physicists. It’s tempting to say that a superposition of the “here” and “there” states is a “here and there” state. Just as we simplified an object being described as “if the position of the object is measured, it will definitely be found here” to “the object is here,” most people simplify the superposition state to “the object is both here and there” — in two places at once! I hope you can see now that this is a ridiculous statement that could have been easily avoided had we not relied on oversimplified short-hand.\n\nNow is a good place to pause and reiterate that *states* are mathematical objects we assign to phenomena that we use in our theories to make predictions. Sometimes the states can faithfully be interpreted through analogies to everyday experiences. We make copious use of these analogies as they provide enormous conceptual economy. However, many states have no direct connection to our everyday experience. Using the typical analogies then quickly results in nonsensical statements and confusion.\n\nTo be clear: an electron, say, is never “in two places at the same.” In fact, in such a superposition state, it is somewhat problematic to even be calling “it” an electron. Electrons are most often considered to be particles, which, if nothing else, have a definite location. The fact that electrons can be in superpositions of the “here” and “there” states forces us to revisit the idea that particles exist at all. There are no particles. There are only phenomena that occasionally behave “as if” they were particles. What *is* an electron in superposition, then? Information. Such a state provides information, heavily couched in the context of the rest of physics, that allows us to make accurate predictions about what will happen next.\n\nNow, if you have reductionist sympathies, you are likely open to the idea that *everything*, including the electron, the apple, and the state of happiness, is built up from billions upon billions of fundamental particles interacting according to the laws of physics. The universe is just a collection of particles arranged in various patterns, some of which happen to be very complex. But if I am just a collection of electrons and other particles, which can be in superposition states, why is it that I cannot? Why isn’t superposition a part of our day-to-day lives?\n\n## Decoherence: Bridging Two Worlds\nWhen a quantum object is isolated, it can maintain its superposition state and exhibit all that strange and counterintuitive goodness we like to ascribe to the quantum world. However, as soon as it interacts with its surroundings, such as air molecules, dust particles, or even photons of light, it becomes *entangled* with the environment, and the superposition quickly deteriorates. The more complex the object, the more interactions it has with its environment and the faster the decoherence process unfolds. For example, a dust grain, floating in the dead of space, as far as possible from anything else, including starlight, would cease to be in a superposition of two locations separated by the width of the grain in less than a second. This is the standard story of how the quantum world gives way to the classical world. The problem with this story is that it just waves more quantum jargon in your face. Entanglement? Who ordered that?\n\nImagine that dust grain again. Initially, suppose it is in one of the “object is here” states. Remember, this simple statement comes with a lot of implicit context. What it means is that if we were to perform an experiment that reveals the location of the dust grain, it would be found in one particular spot. Experiments and measurements are something we take for granted at human scales. One of the most confronting lessons quantum physics teaches us is that measurement requires some interaction with the object of investigation. It’s the context of that measurement that defines the possible outcomes that provide us with information.\n\nFor example, superpositions of “here” and “there” are not among the possible states that can be observed if we arrange to measure the position of the dust grain. There are measurements, called *interference experiments,* that do reveal superposition states, but they are not “position” measurements, and they would be extremely difficult to perform. As noted, such an experiment would at least require an environment more extreme than deep space. Perhaps we will one day perform one of these interference experiments with an object that can be seen with the naked eye. However, there would be absolutely no sense in asking what the superposition states “looks” like because “looking” would necessitate a position measurement, which, again, does not have superposition states as its possible outcomes. The only thing such an experiment would look like is data shown to you on a screen — just more information.\n\nIf the interactions between things and a dust grain did not provide information about its location, the superposition state would be maintained. However, the entire concept of location would also be irrelevant in such a situation. It’s the proliferation of location information that gives a “here and there” superposition state meaning and why it features in the theory at all. In effect, our everyday world is a collection of particles with locations because they all mutually encode position information of each other. If it were otherwise, *we* would not exist. Superposition is not miraculous. It’s the simple, classical “here” and “there” states that provide all the beauty and complexity of our experience. Quantum physics is really a theory about isolation, and it doesn’t apply to you — nor would you want it to.","meta_canonical":null}

3. Robots.txt Check

Query:

Response:

4. Spam/Ban Check

Query:

Response:

5. Seen Status Check

ℹ️ Skipped - page is already crawled

📄

INDEXABLE

✅

CRAWLED

7 days ago

🤖

ROBOTS SERVER UNREACHABLE

Failed to connect to robots server: Operation timed out after 2002 milliseconds with 0 bytes received

Page Info Filters

Filter	Status	Condition	Details
HTTP status	PASS	`download_http_code = 200`	HTTP 200
Age cutoff	PASS	`download_stamp > now() - 6 MONTH`	0.2 months ago
History drop	PASS	`isNull(history_drop_reason)`	No drop reason
Spam/ban	PASS	`fh_dont_index != 1 AND ml_spam_score = 0`	ml_spam_score=0
Canonical	PASS	`meta_canonical IS NULL OR = '' OR = src_unparsed`	Not set

Page Details

Property	Value
URL	https://csferrie.medium.com/in-two-place-at-once-d0e02dc1e49
Last Crawled	2026-04-15 05:23:14 (7 days ago)
First Indexed	2023-04-07 08:03:19 (3 years ago)
HTTP Status Code	200
Meta Title	In Two Place At Once. Unraveling the mystery of quantum… \| by Chris Ferrie \| Medium
Meta Description	In Two Place At Once Unraveling the mystery of quantum superposition You often hear that quantum objects can be in superposition, meaning they can occupy multiple locations simultaneously. This …
Meta Canonical	null
Boilerpipe Text	Unraveling the mystery of quantum superposition 8 min read Mar 30, 2023 Press enter or click to view image in full size You often hear that quantum objects can be in superposition, meaning they can occupy multiple locations simultaneously. This concept has captured the imagination of many, leading to a plethora of pop culture references and misconceptions. To truly appreciate superposition, though, we must first examine what it really means, why the colloquial interpretation is problematic, and how the concept of information can help us grasp its true essence. Quantum Physics in 60 Seconds Before diving into the intricacies of superposition and information, let’s take a moment to revisit the basics of quantum physics. Quantum physics, often used synonymously with quantum mechanics and quantum theory , is the branch of science that humans use to describe the behavior of matter and energy at the smallest scales, such as atoms, electrons, and photons — and quite successfully so, I might add. Though, as we will soon discuss, the theory is now applied well beyond this regime. At this microscopic level, the familiar and intuitive rules of classical physics that work well to describe our everyday experiences no longer apply. Instead, the particles and their interactions are governed by a set of new rules that were developed in the first half of the 20th century. The rules contain several counterintuitive principles, with names such as wave-particle duality, quantum entanglement, and, of course, superposition. But in repeating these things that are said about quantum physics, I’ve already sinned by suggesting it must be grounded and understood in terms of real physical things, which don’t exist in the way we are compelled to imagine them. These principles defy our common sense and challenge our preconceived notions of reality, but they have been confirmed time and time again through rigorous experimentation. The field of quantum physics has its fingerprints on every scientific discovery and technological innovation since its inception. Without quantum physics, we would not know what we are made of, let alone what stars and galaxies are made of, nor would we understand the mechanisms of chemistry or biology and that DNA encodes the recipe to make what we are. Hell, without quantum physics, we wouldn’t even be able to accurately explain why the sky is blue. (It’s because air molecules have a quantum energy level structure tuned to higher visible frequencies causing them to absorb and emit more blue light, which is scattered in the sky, by the way.) Quantum physics has revolutionized our modern technology-infused world with innovations such as lasers, transistors, atomic clocks, and every medical scan you’ve ever had or seen on TV. It’s been said in more ways than one that “nobody understands quantum physics.” Yet, here we are, using it to make the most accurate predictions ever made by humanity. The fact of the matter is many people understand quantum physics. The problem is that, apparently, nobody can provide a genuinely honest and useful explanation of their understanding. Physicists resort to oversimplification and subtle analogies that ought to come with big disclaimers or not be used at all outside of academia. It’s not their fault, though, as we simply don’t have good language to discuss these things. Personally, the concepts of information theory provide me with a comfortable understanding of quantum physics. I’m going to share some aspects of it with you. Perhaps it’s not objectively “good,” but I think it’s much better than the way we have been doing it for almost a hundred years now. So without further ado, let’s start with the simplest “counterintuitive” concept in quantum physics. Superposition: Splitting the Quantum and Classical World The idea of superposition is central to quantum physics. It’s often oversimplified as particles existing in multiple locations at once. But that’s a bit like trying to explain a complex painting with a single brushstroke, without paint on it. In truth, superposition refers to the mathematical representation of a quantum object’s state. You can imagine a particular state as a spreadsheet filled with numbers that encode all the information required to predict the outcomes of experiments performed using that object. We often refer to objects as being “in” states, and that terminology is not limited to quantum physics. Get Chris Ferrie’s stories in your inbox Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer. Remember me for faster sign in It might be said that you are “in” a state of happiness. But this implies that happiness is a real objective thing or that states, in general, are objective things that objects transition through. But happiness is not objective. Happiness is really a shorthand concept for a bunch of expectations I should have for your actions, like that you will smile, laugh, and engage positively. Another abused two-letter word: is. We might ask, “what color is the apple?” We definitely don’t say, “if white light shines on this apple, I will perceive what I have been told is the sensation of redness.” No, we just say the apple “is” red, even though red isn’t a real physical state. For our everyday experiences, this is unproblematic, though google “pink is not a color,” and you’ll see that it’s not hard to find pedantry in just about anything. Quantum states are also not objective things that particles pass through — they are mathematical tools that help us understand and predict the behavior of quantum objects in various situations. There are basic states that predict intuitive things like, “if the position of the object is measured, it will definitely be found here” or “if the position of the object is measured, it will definitely be found there.” But, again, instead of writing out sentences that could quickly turn into paragraphs, we use a conceptual short-hand and say the object is “in” the state of being here or, simpler still, the object just “is” here, or there. It’s important to keep in mind that states are mathematical objects. The state summarized as “object is here” is actually a spreadsheet of numbers, as is the state summarized as “object is there .” Being made of numbers, we can easily imagine adding them together, giving us a new spreadsheet — a new state. This is a valid description of the object — it can be “in” this state. But what does this mean? Well, technically, nothing beyond what I’ve already said. This state is nothing but information that provides predictions for any experiment performed using the object. Of course, this is a deeply unsatisfying answer to you, as it has been to generations of physicists. It’s tempting to say that a superposition of the “here” and “there” states is a “here and there” state. Just as we simplified an object being described as “if the position of the object is measured, it will definitely be found here” to “the object is here,” most people simplify the superposition state to “the object is both here and there” — in two places at once! I hope you can see now that this is a ridiculous statement that could have been easily avoided had we not relied on oversimplified short-hand. Now is a good place to pause and reiterate that states are mathematical objects we assign to phenomena that we use in our theories to make predictions. Sometimes the states can faithfully be interpreted through analogies to everyday experiences. We make copious use of these analogies as they provide enormous conceptual economy. However, many states have no direct connection to our everyday experience. Using the typical analogies then quickly results in nonsensical statements and confusion. To be clear: an electron, say, is never “in two places at the same.” In fact, in such a superposition state, it is somewhat problematic to even be calling “it” an electron. Electrons are most often considered to be particles, which, if nothing else, have a definite location. The fact that electrons can be in superpositions of the “here” and “there” states forces us to revisit the idea that particles exist at all. There are no particles. There are only phenomena that occasionally behave “as if” they were particles. What is an electron in superposition, then? Information. Such a state provides information, heavily couched in the context of the rest of physics, that allows us to make accurate predictions about what will happen next. Now, if you have reductionist sympathies, you are likely open to the idea that everything , including the electron, the apple, and the state of happiness, is built up from billions upon billions of fundamental particles interacting according to the laws of physics. The universe is just a collection of particles arranged in various patterns, some of which happen to be very complex. But if I am just a collection of electrons and other particles, which can be in superposition states, why is it that I cannot? Why isn’t superposition a part of our day-to-day lives? Decoherence: Bridging Two Worlds When a quantum object is isolated, it can maintain its superposition state and exhibit all that strange and counterintuitive goodness we like to ascribe to the quantum world. However, as soon as it interacts with its surroundings, such as air molecules, dust particles, or even photons of light, it becomes entangled with the environment, and the superposition quickly deteriorates. The more complex the object, the more interactions it has with its environment and the faster the decoherence process unfolds. For example, a dust grain, floating in the dead of space, as far as possible from anything else, including starlight, would cease to be in a superposition of two locations separated by the width of the grain in less than a second. This is the standard story of how the quantum world gives way to the classical world. The problem with this story is that it just waves more quantum jargon in your face. Entanglement? Who ordered that? Imagine that dust grain again. Initially, suppose it is in one of the “object is here” states. Remember, this simple statement comes with a lot of implicit context. What it means is that if we were to perform an experiment that reveals the location of the dust grain, it would be found in one particular spot. Experiments and measurements are something we take for granted at human scales. One of the most confronting lessons quantum physics teaches us is that measurement requires some interaction with the object of investigation. It’s the context of that measurement that defines the possible outcomes that provide us with information. For example, superpositions of “here” and “there” are not among the possible states that can be observed if we arrange to measure the position of the dust grain. There are measurements, called interference experiments, that do reveal superposition states, but they are not “position” measurements, and they would be extremely difficult to perform. As noted, such an experiment would at least require an environment more extreme than deep space. Perhaps we will one day perform one of these interference experiments with an object that can be seen with the naked eye. However, there would be absolutely no sense in asking what the superposition states “looks” like because “looking” would necessitate a position measurement, which, again, does not have superposition states as its possible outcomes. The only thing such an experiment would look like is data shown to you on a screen — just more information. If the interactions between things and a dust grain did not provide information about its location, the superposition state would be maintained. However, the entire concept of location would also be irrelevant in such a situation. It’s the proliferation of location information that gives a “here and there” superposition state meaning and why it features in the theory at all. In effect, our everyday world is a collection of particles with locations because they all mutually encode position information of each other. If it were otherwise, we would not exist. Superposition is not miraculous. It’s the simple, classical “here” and “there” states that provide all the beauty and complexity of our experience. Quantum physics is really a theory about isolation, and it doesn’t apply to you — nor would you want it to.
Markdown	[Sitemap](https://csferrie.medium.com/sitemap/sitemap.xml) [Open in app](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.medium.reader&referrer=utm_source%3DmobileNavBar&source=post_page---top_nav_layout_nav-----------------------------------------) Sign up [Sign in](https://medium.com/m/signin?operation=login&redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fcsferrie.medium.com%2Fin-two-place-at-once-d0e02dc1e49&source=post_page---top_nav_layout_nav-----------------------global_nav------------------) [Medium Logo](https://medium.com/?source=post_page---top_nav_layout_nav-----------------------------------------) Get app [Write](https://medium.com/m/signin?operation=register&redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fmedium.com%2Fnew-story&source=---top_nav_layout_nav-----------------------new_post_topnav------------------) [Search](https://medium.com/search?source=post_page---top_nav_layout_nav-----------------------------------------) Sign up [Sign in](https://medium.com/m/signin?operation=login&redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fcsferrie.medium.com%2Fin-two-place-at-once-d0e02dc1e49&source=post_page---top_nav_layout_nav-----------------------global_nav------------------) ![](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fill:32:32/1dmbNkD5D-u45r44go_cf0g.png) Top highlight # In Two Place At Once ## Unraveling the mystery of quantum superposition [![Chris Ferrie](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fill:32:32/1uKcuUivFSLmwMdee17B3nQ.jpeg)](https://csferrie.medium.com/?source=post_page---byline--d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------) [Chris Ferrie](https://csferrie.medium.com/?source=post_page---byline--d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------) Follow 8 min read · Mar 30, 2023 365 6 [Listen](https://medium.com/m/signin?actionUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fmedium.com%2Fplans%3Fdimension%3Dpost_audio_button%26postId%3Dd0e02dc1e49&operation=register&redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fcsferrie.medium.com%2Fin-two-place-at-once-d0e02dc1e49&source=---header_actions--d0e02dc1e49---------------------post_audio_button------------------) Share Press enter or click to view image in full size ![](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:700/04VvoTpDYOqZf6Y5t) You often hear that quantum objects can be in superposition, meaning they can occupy multiple locations simultaneously. This concept has captured the imagination of many, leading to a plethora of pop culture references and misconceptions. To truly appreciate superposition, though, we must first examine what it really means, why the colloquial interpretation is problematic, and how the concept of information can help us grasp its true essence. ## Quantum Physics in 60 Seconds Before diving into the intricacies of superposition and information, let’s take a moment to revisit the basics of quantum physics. Quantum physics, often used synonymously with quantum mechanics* and quantum theory, is the branch of science that humans use to describe the behavior of matter and energy at the smallest scales, such as atoms, electrons, and photons — and quite successfully so, I might add. Though, as we will soon discuss, the theory is now applied well beyond this regime. At this microscopic level, the familiar and intuitive rules of classical physics that work well to describe our everyday experiences no longer apply. Instead, the particles and their interactions are governed by a set of new rules that were developed in the first half of the 20th century. The rules contain several counterintuitive principles, with names such as wave-particle duality, quantum entanglement, and, of course, superposition. But in repeating these things that are said about quantum physics, I’ve already sinned by suggesting it must be grounded and understood in terms of real physical things, which don’t exist in the way we are compelled to imagine them. These principles defy our common sense and challenge our preconceived notions of reality, but they have been confirmed time and time again through rigorous experimentation. The field of quantum physics has its fingerprints on every scientific discovery and technological innovation since its inception. Without quantum physics, we would not know what we are made of, let alone what stars and galaxies are made of, nor would we understand the mechanisms of chemistry or biology and that DNA encodes the recipe to make what we are. Hell, without quantum physics, we wouldn’t even be able to accurately explain why the sky is blue. (It’s because air molecules have a quantum energy level structure tuned to higher visible frequencies causing them to absorb and emit more blue light, which is scattered in the sky, by the way.) Quantum physics has revolutionized our modern technology-infused world with innovations such as lasers, transistors, atomic clocks, and every medical scan you’ve ever had or seen on TV. It’s been said in more ways than one that “nobody understands quantum physics.” Yet, here we are, using it to make the most accurate predictions ever made by humanity. The fact of the matter is many people understand quantum physics. The problem is that, apparently, nobody can provide a genuinely honest and useful explanation of their understanding. Physicists resort to oversimplification and subtle analogies that ought to come with big disclaimers or not be used at all outside of academia. It’s not their fault, though, as we simply don’t have good language to discuss these things. Personally, the concepts of information theory provide me with a comfortable understanding of quantum physics. I’m going to share some aspects of it with you. Perhaps it’s not objectively “good,” but I think it’s much better than the way we have been doing it for almost a hundred years now. So without further ado, let’s start with the simplest “counterintuitive” concept in quantum physics. ## Superposition: Splitting the Quantum and Classical World The idea of superposition is central to quantum physics. It’s often oversimplified as particles existing in multiple locations at once. But that’s a bit like trying to explain a complex painting with a single brushstroke, without paint on it. In truth, superposition refers to the mathematical representation of a quantum object’s state. You can imagine a particular state as a spreadsheet filled with numbers that encode all the information required to predict the outcomes of experiments performed using that object. We often refer to objects as being “in” states, and that terminology is not limited to quantum physics. ## Get Chris Ferrie’s stories in your inbox Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer. Subscribe Subscribe Remember me for faster sign in It might be said that you are “in” a state of happiness. But this implies that happiness is a real objective thing or that states, in general, are objective things that objects transition through. But happiness is not objective. Happiness is really a shorthand concept for a bunch of expectations I should have for your actions, like that you will smile, laugh, and engage positively. Another abused two-letter word: is. We might ask, “what color is the apple?” We definitely don’t say, “if white light shines on this apple, I will perceive what I have been told is the sensation of redness.” No, we just say the apple “is” red, even though red isn’t a real physical state. For our everyday experiences, this is unproblematic, though google “pink is not a color,” and you’ll see that it’s not hard to find pedantry in just about anything. Quantum states are also not objective things that particles pass through — they are mathematical tools that help us understand and predict the behavior of quantum objects in various situations. There are basic states that predict intuitive things like, “if the position of the object is measured, it will definitely be found here” or “if the position of the object is measured, it will definitely be found there.” But, again, instead of writing out sentences that could quickly turn into paragraphs, we use a conceptual short-hand and say the object is “in” the state of being here or, simpler still, the object just “is” here, or there. It’s important to keep in mind that states are mathematical objects. The state summarized as “object is here” is actually a spreadsheet of numbers, as is the state summarized as “object is there.” Being made of numbers, we can easily imagine adding them together, giving us a new spreadsheet — a new state. This is a valid description of the object — it can be “in” this state. But what does this mean? Well, technically, nothing beyond what I’ve already said. This state is nothing but information that provides predictions for any experiment performed using the object. Of course, this is a deeply unsatisfying answer to you, as it has been to generations of physicists. It’s tempting to say that a superposition of the “here” and “there” states is a “here and there” state. Just as we simplified an object being described as “if the position of the object is measured, it will definitely be found here” to “the object is here,” most people simplify the superposition state to “the object is both here and there” — in two places at once! I hope you can see now that this is a ridiculous statement that could have been easily avoided had we not relied on oversimplified short-hand. Now is a good place to pause and reiterate that states are mathematical objects we assign to phenomena that we use in our theories to make predictions. Sometimes the states can faithfully be interpreted through analogies to everyday experiences. We make copious use of these analogies as they provide enormous conceptual economy. However, many states have no direct connection to our everyday experience. Using the typical analogies then quickly results in nonsensical statements and confusion. To be clear: an electron, say, is never “in two places at the same.” In fact, in such a superposition state, it is somewhat problematic to even be calling “it” an electron. Electrons are most often considered to be particles, which, if nothing else, have a definite location. The fact that electrons can be in superpositions of the “here” and “there” states forces us to revisit the idea that particles exist at all. There are no particles. There are only phenomena that occasionally behave “as if” they were particles. What is an electron in superposition, then? Information. Such a state provides information, heavily couched in the context of the rest of physics, that allows us to make accurate predictions about what will happen next. Now, if you have reductionist sympathies, you are likely open to the idea that everything, including the electron, the apple, and the state of happiness, is built up from billions upon billions of fundamental particles interacting according to the laws of physics. The universe is just a collection of particles arranged in various patterns, some of which happen to be very complex. But if I am just a collection of electrons and other particles, which can be in superposition states, why is it that I cannot? Why isn’t superposition a part of our day-to-day lives? ## Decoherence: Bridging Two Worlds When a quantum object is isolated, it can maintain its superposition state and exhibit all that strange and counterintuitive goodness we like to ascribe to the quantum world. However, as soon as it interacts with its surroundings, such as air molecules, dust particles, or even photons of light, it becomes entangled with the environment, and the superposition quickly deteriorates. The more complex the object, the more interactions it has with its environment and the faster the decoherence process unfolds. For example, a dust grain, floating in the dead of space, as far as possible from anything else, including starlight, would cease to be in a superposition of two locations separated by the width of the grain in less than a second. This is the standard story of how the quantum world gives way to the classical world. The problem with this story is that it just waves more quantum jargon in your face. Entanglement? Who ordered that? Imagine that dust grain again. Initially, suppose it is in one of the “object is here” states. Remember, this simple statement comes with a lot of implicit context. What it means is that if we were to perform an experiment that reveals the location of the dust grain, it would be found in one particular spot. Experiments and measurements are something we take for granted at human scales. One of the most confronting lessons quantum physics teaches us is that measurement requires some interaction with the object of investigation. It’s the context of that measurement that defines the possible outcomes that provide us with information. For example, superpositions of “here” and “there” are not among the possible states that can be observed if we arrange to measure the position of the dust grain. There are measurements, called interference experiments, that do reveal superposition states, but they are not “position” measurements, and they would be extremely difficult to perform. As noted, such an experiment would at least require an environment more extreme than deep space. Perhaps we will one day perform one of these interference experiments with an object that can be seen with the naked eye. However, there would be absolutely no sense in asking what the superposition states “looks” like because “looking” would necessitate a position measurement, which, again, does not have superposition states as its possible outcomes. The only thing such an experiment would look like is data shown to you on a screen — just more information. If the interactions between things and a dust grain did not provide information about its location, the superposition state would be maintained. However, the entire concept of location would also be irrelevant in such a situation. It’s the proliferation of location information that gives a “here and there” superposition state meaning and why it features in the theory at all. In effect, our everyday world is a collection of particles with locations because they all mutually encode position information of each other. If it were otherwise, we would not exist. Superposition is not miraculous. It’s the simple, classical “here” and “there” states that provide all the beauty and complexity of our experience. Quantum physics is really a theory about isolation, and it doesn’t apply to you — nor would you want it to. [Quantum Physics](https://medium.com/tag/quantum-physics?source=post_page-----d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------) [Superposition](https://medium.com/tag/superposition?source=post_page-----d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------) [Metaphysics](https://medium.com/tag/metaphysics?source=post_page-----d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------) [Philosophy](https://medium.com/tag/philosophy?source=post_page-----d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------) [Reality](https://medium.com/tag/reality?source=post_page-----d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------) 365 365 6 [![Chris Ferrie](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fill:48:48/1uKcuUivFSLmwMdee17B3nQ.jpeg)](https://csferrie.medium.com/?source=post_page---post_author_info--d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------) [![Chris Ferrie](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fill:64:64/1uKcuUivFSLmwMdee17B3nQ.jpeg)](https://csferrie.medium.com/?source=post_page---post_author_info--d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------) Follow [Written by Chris Ferrie](https://csferrie.medium.com/?source=post_page---post_author_info--d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------) [9\.7K followers](https://csferrie.medium.com/followers?source=post_page---post_author_info--d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------) ·[25 following](https://csferrie.medium.com/following?source=post_page---post_author_info--d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------) Quantum theorist by day, father by night. Occasionally moonlighting as a author. [csferrie.com](http://csferrie.com/) Follow ## Responses (6) ![](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fill:32:32/1dmbNkD5D-u45r44go_cf0g.png) Write a response [What are your thoughts?](https://medium.com/m/signin?operation=register&redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fcsferrie.medium.com%2Fin-two-place-at-once-d0e02dc1e49&source=---post_responses--d0e02dc1e49---------------------respond_sidebar------------------) Cancel Respond [![Chris Ferrie](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fill:32:32/1uKcuUivFSLmwMdee17B3nQ.jpeg)](https://csferrie.medium.com/?source=post_page---post_responses--d0e02dc1e49----0-----------------------------------) [Chris Ferrie](https://csferrie.medium.com/?source=post_page---post_responses--d0e02dc1e49----0-----------------------------------) Author [Apr 4, 2023](https://csferrie.medium.com/you-can-perfectly-emulate-a-quantum-computer-e-g-a8ed0bd849e?source=post_page---post_responses--d0e02dc1e49----0-----------------------------------) ``` You can perfectly emulate a quantum computer (e.g., https://algassert.com/quirk) yourself. In doing so, you will "achieve" superpositions and entanglement and even do quantum computations.The goal of quantum computing, as a discipline today, is to… more ``` 3 1 reply Reply [![Андрей Шляховой](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fill:32:32/11bnn-WqMca-AG03h2RZWpw.jpeg)](https://medium.com/@andrey.shlyakhovoy?source=post_page---post_responses--d0e02dc1e49----1-----------------------------------) [Андрей Шляховой](https://medium.com/@andrey.shlyakhovoy?source=post_page---post_responses--d0e02dc1e49----1-----------------------------------) [Sep 2, 2025](https://medium.com/@andrey.shlyakhovoy/a-fascinating-read-b6d6c20fcbee?source=post_page---post_responses--d0e02dc1e49----1-----------------------------------) ``` A fascinating read. While quantum mechanics might seem far removed from finance and business, I see strong parallels in decision-making under uncertainty. Much like particles in superposition, leaders often have to operate in multiple “realities” at… more ``` 3 Reply [![Poganystefano](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fill:32:32/0mUr953gPesg0n4Bx)](https://medium.com/@poganystefano?source=post_page---post_responses--d0e02dc1e49----2-----------------------------------) [Poganystefano](https://medium.com/@poganystefano?source=post_page---post_responses--d0e02dc1e49----2-----------------------------------) [Aug 31, 2024](https://medium.com/@poganystefano/again-very-nice-article-8caab9c680fc?source=post_page---post_responses--d0e02dc1e49----2-----------------------------------) ``` Again, very nice article! ``` 3 Reply See all responses ## More from Chris Ferrie ![Quantum entanglement is far stranger than you’ve been told](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:679/format:webp/0GyhOXq_eVRLe7_ir) [![Chris Ferrie](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fill:20:20/1uKcuUivFSLmwMdee17B3nQ.jpeg)](https://csferrie.medium.com/?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----0---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------) [Chris Ferrie](https://csferrie.medium.com/?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----0---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------) [Quantum entanglement is far stranger than you’ve been toldQuantum entanglement. What the hell is it? Perhaps you’ve read that](https://csferrie.medium.com/quantum-entanglement-is-far-stranger-than-youve-been-told-60a060228ee0?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----0---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------) Mar 14 [A clap icon 1.6KA response icon 57](https://csferrie.medium.com/quantum-entanglement-is-far-stranger-than-youve-been-told-60a060228ee0?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----0---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------) ![Why is no one taught the one concept in quantum physics that denies reality?](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:679/format:webp/07UyonxvThJLT2HHK) [![Chris Ferrie](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fill:20:20/1uKcuUivFSLmwMdee17B3nQ.jpeg)](https://csferrie.medium.com/?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----1---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------) [Chris Ferrie](https://csferrie.medium.com/?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----1---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------) [Why is no one taught the one concept in quantum physics that denies reality?It’s called contextuality, and it is the essence of quantum physics.](https://csferrie.medium.com/why-is-no-one-taught-the-one-concept-in-quantum-physics-that-denies-reality-070dd63449ca?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----1---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------) Jan 30 [A clap icon 1.5KA response icon 50](https://csferrie.medium.com/why-is-no-one-taught-the-one-concept-in-quantum-physics-that-denies-reality-070dd63449ca?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----1---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------) ![Thanos Was Wrong… Because He Didn’t Do The Math](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:679/format:webp/0iafwrCe7MT6jJObk) [![Chris Ferrie](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fill:20:20/1uKcuUivFSLmwMdee17B3nQ.jpeg)](https://csferrie.medium.com/?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----2---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------) [Chris Ferrie](https://csferrie.medium.com/?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----2---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------) [Thanos Was Wrong… Because He Didn’t Do The Math(And what it teaches you about why no one understands inflation)](https://csferrie.medium.com/thanos-was-wrong-because-he-didnt-do-the-math-29257204cf4c?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----2---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------) Apr 4 [A clap icon 401A response icon 14](https://csferrie.medium.com/thanos-was-wrong-because-he-didnt-do-the-math-29257204cf4c?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----2---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------) ![Quantum Reality Is Not Really Real, But It’s Real Enough](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:679/format:webp/0iRaDmoUNbLZUaLoY) [![Chris Ferrie](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fill:20:20/1uKcuUivFSLmwMdee17B3nQ.jpeg)](https://csferrie.medium.com/?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----3---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------) [Chris Ferrie](https://csferrie.medium.com/?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----3---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------) [Quantum Reality Is Not Really Real, But It’s Real EnoughThe universe is out there, doing its own thing, whether we are looking at it or not.](https://csferrie.medium.com/quantum-reality-is-not-really-real-but-its-real-enough-e2f47b21a37e?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----3---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------) Mar 30 [A clap icon 182A response icon 11](https://csferrie.medium.com/quantum-reality-is-not-really-real-but-its-real-enough-e2f47b21a37e?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----3---------------------89cb4e25_a2e9_4f30_ad6f_9be6532a0874--------------) [See all from Chris Ferrie](https://csferrie.medium.com/?source=post_page---author_recirc--d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------) ## Recommended from Medium ![Quantum entanglement is far stranger than you’ve been told](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:679/format:webp/0GyhOXq_eVRLe7_ir) [![Chris Ferrie](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fill:20:20/1uKcuUivFSLmwMdee17B3nQ.jpeg)](https://csferrie.medium.com/?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----0---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------) [Chris Ferrie](https://csferrie.medium.com/?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----0---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------) [Quantum entanglement is far stranger than you’ve been toldQuantum entanglement. What the hell is it? Perhaps you’ve read that](https://csferrie.medium.com/quantum-entanglement-is-far-stranger-than-youve-been-told-60a060228ee0?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----0---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------) Mar 14 [A clap icon 1.6KA response icon 57](https://csferrie.medium.com/quantum-entanglement-is-far-stranger-than-youve-been-told-60a060228ee0?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----0---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------) ![Two men sitting at a table, one with a high cognitive load (in red) and the other with no cognitive load (in blue), indicating truth.](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:679/format:webp/1YKkw7AkAY2KS6m5_L1JtRA.png) [![E³ — Entertain Enlighten Empower](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fill:20:20/1h_6wWa6j1p0REtXY7wuRGQ.png)](https://medium.com/the-springboard?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----1---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------) In [E³ — Entertain Enlighten Empower](https://medium.com/the-springboard?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----1---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------) by [Joshua Mason](https://medium.com/@iamjoshmason?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----1---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------) [How to Spot a Liar in 3 Questions (Without Them Knowing)The secret to detecting deception isn’t about body language — it’s about “Cognitive Load.”](https://medium.com/@iamjoshmason/how-to-spot-a-liar-in-3-questions-without-them-knowing-58c77069ef9b?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----1---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------) Dec 11, 2025 [A clap icon 23KA response icon 533](https://medium.com/@iamjoshmason/how-to-spot-a-liar-in-3-questions-without-them-knowing-58c77069ef9b?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----1---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------) ![The Church’s Obsession With Sexual Sin Is Historically Weird](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:679/format:webp/1TVZbengiE1ilwlQDCOFuWQ.jpeg) [![Backyard Church](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fill:20:20/1AcPwoVqPHxkKZJZSH5T3QQ.png)](https://medium.com/backyard-theology?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----0---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------) In [Backyard Church](https://medium.com/backyard-theology?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----0---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------) by [Dan Foster](https://danfosterwriter.medium.com/?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----0---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------) [The Church’s Obsession With Sexual Sin Is Historically WeirdHow early Christians ranked sins very differently from modern evangelicals](https://danfosterwriter.medium.com/the-churchs-obsession-with-sexual-sin-is-historically-weird-96c02011522a?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----0---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------) Feb 13 [A clap icon 3.6KA response icon 118](https://danfosterwriter.medium.com/the-churchs-obsession-with-sexual-sin-is-historically-weird-96c02011522a?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----0---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------) ![Four Cool Japanese Home Appliances the World Hasn’t Discovered Yet](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:679/format:webp/0k-zFF3cj2IV5zfmu.jpeg) [![New East](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fill:20:20/1tdHjTa20spnGWxA3kuI9lA.jpeg)](https://medium.com/new-east?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----1---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------) In [New East](https://medium.com/new-east?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----1---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------) by [Yuri Minamide](https://medium.com/@yuriminamide0509?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----1---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------) [Four Cool Japanese Home Appliances the World Hasn’t Discovered YetYou might end up wanting one or two of them](https://medium.com/@yuriminamide0509/four-cool-japanese-home-appliances-the-world-hasnt-discovered-yet-fbb82793d894?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----1---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------) Feb 20 [A clap icon 4KA response icon 63](https://medium.com/@yuriminamide0509/four-cool-japanese-home-appliances-the-world-hasnt-discovered-yet-fbb82793d894?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----1---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------) ![A futuristic 3D visualization of two massive data centers — one blue for Microsoft and one purple/green for OpenAI — separated by a glowing orange tectonic crack and severed fiber optic cables.](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:679/format:webp/1rRInK1ARZKPmpBnF4fxLKw.png) [![ILLUMINATION](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fill:20:20/1AZxiin1Cvws3J0TwNUP2sQ.png)](https://medium.com/illumination?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----2---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------) In [ILLUMINATION](https://medium.com/illumination?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----2---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------) by [Somya Golchha](https://medium.com/@jainsomya2510?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----2---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------) [The Microsoft-OpenAI Divorce Is Official: Inside the \$250 Billion BetrayalGPT-5 is already being retired, and Satya Nadella just made his move. The “partnership” of the century is entering its terminal phase.](https://medium.com/@jainsomya2510/the-microsoft-openai-divorce-is-official-inside-the-250-billion-betrayal-822073eba64e?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----2---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------) Feb 18 [A clap icon 4.1KA response icon 102](https://medium.com/@jainsomya2510/the-microsoft-openai-divorce-is-official-inside-the-250-billion-betrayal-822073eba64e?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----2---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------) ![4 MORE Major Lies Christians Tell About Jesus](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:679/format:webp/1Kk0x9-HwYToZFcNPr-4tOA.jpeg) [![Andrew Springer](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fill:20:20/11bNWMmScAu5tNyd0sf8qdw@2x.jpeg)](https://andrewspringer.medium.com/?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----3---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------) [Andrew Springer](https://andrewspringer.medium.com/?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----3---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------) [4 MORE Major Lies Christians Tell About JesusA couple of weeks ago, I wrote an essay for The Jesus Movement that laid out four major lies Christians tell about Jesus. The response to…](https://andrewspringer.medium.com/4-more-major-lies-christians-tell-about-jesus-b3048bc49ae4?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----3---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------) Feb 15 [A clap icon 1.3KA response icon 44](https://andrewspringer.medium.com/4-more-major-lies-christians-tell-about-jesus-b3048bc49ae4?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49----3---------------------fdf51197_688d_4438_8e2e_a4c1cbb323da--------------) [See more recommendations](https://medium.com/?source=post_page---read_next_recirc--d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------) [Help](https://help.medium.com/hc/en-us?source=post_page-----d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------) [Status](https://status.medium.com/?source=post_page-----d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------) [About](https://medium.com/about?autoplay=1&source=post_page-----d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------) [Careers](https://medium.com/jobs-at-medium/work-at-medium-959d1a85284e?source=post_page-----d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------) [Press](mailto:pressinquiries@medium.com) [Blog](https://blog.medium.com/?source=post_page-----d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------) [Privacy](https://policy.medium.com/medium-privacy-policy-f03bf92035c9?source=post_page-----d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------) [Rules](https://policy.medium.com/medium-rules-30e5502c4eb4?source=post_page-----d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------) [Terms](https://policy.medium.com/medium-terms-of-service-9db0094a1e0f?source=post_page-----d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------) [Text to speech](https://speechify.com/medium?source=post_page-----d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------)
Readable Markdown	## Unraveling the mystery of quantum superposition [![Chris Ferrie](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fill:32:32/1uKcuUivFSLmwMdee17B3nQ.jpeg)](https://csferrie.medium.com/?source=post_page---byline--d0e02dc1e49---------------------------------------) 8 min read Mar 30, 2023 Press enter or click to view image in full size ![](https://miro.medium.com/v2/resize:fit:700/04VvoTpDYOqZf6Y5t) You often hear that quantum objects can be in superposition, meaning they can occupy multiple locations simultaneously. This concept has captured the imagination of many, leading to a plethora of pop culture references and misconceptions. To truly appreciate superposition, though, we must first examine what it really means, why the colloquial interpretation is problematic, and how the concept of information can help us grasp its true essence. ## Quantum Physics in 60 Seconds Before diving into the intricacies of superposition and information, let’s take a moment to revisit the basics of quantum physics. Quantum physics, often used synonymously with quantum mechanics and quantum theory, is the branch of science that humans use to describe the behavior of matter and energy at the smallest scales, such as atoms, electrons, and photons — and quite successfully so, I might add. Though, as we will soon discuss, the theory is now applied well beyond this regime. At this microscopic level, the familiar and intuitive rules of classical physics that work well to describe our everyday experiences no longer apply. Instead, the particles and their interactions are governed by a set of new rules that were developed in the first half of the 20th century. The rules contain several counterintuitive principles, with names such as wave-particle duality, quantum entanglement, and, of course, superposition. But in repeating these things that are said about quantum physics, I’ve already sinned by suggesting it must be grounded and understood in terms of real physical things, which don’t exist in the way we are compelled to imagine them. These principles defy our common sense and challenge our preconceived notions of reality, but they have been confirmed time and time again through rigorous experimentation. The field of quantum physics has its fingerprints on every scientific discovery and technological innovation since its inception. Without quantum physics, we would not know what we are made of, let alone what stars and galaxies are made of, nor would we understand the mechanisms of chemistry or biology and that DNA encodes the recipe to make what we are. Hell, without quantum physics, we wouldn’t even be able to accurately explain why the sky is blue. (It’s because air molecules have a quantum energy level structure tuned to higher visible frequencies causing them to absorb and emit more blue light, which is scattered in the sky, by the way.) Quantum physics has revolutionized our modern technology-infused world with innovations such as lasers, transistors, atomic clocks, and every medical scan you’ve ever had or seen on TV. It’s been said in more ways than one that “nobody understands quantum physics.” Yet, here we are, using it to make the most accurate predictions ever made by humanity. The fact of the matter is many people understand quantum physics. The problem is that, apparently, nobody can provide a genuinely honest and useful explanation of their understanding. Physicists resort to oversimplification and subtle analogies that ought to come with big disclaimers or not be used at all outside of academia. It’s not their fault, though, as we simply don’t have good language to discuss these things. Personally, the concepts of information theory provide me with a comfortable understanding of quantum physics. I’m going to share some aspects of it with you. Perhaps it’s not objectively “good,” but I think it’s much better than the way we have been doing it for almost a hundred years now. So without further ado, let’s start with the simplest “counterintuitive” concept in quantum physics. ## Superposition: Splitting the Quantum and Classical World The idea of superposition is central to quantum physics. It’s often oversimplified as particles existing in multiple locations at once. But that’s a bit like trying to explain a complex painting with a single brushstroke, without paint on it. In truth, superposition refers to the mathematical representation of a quantum object’s state. You can imagine a particular state as a spreadsheet filled with numbers that encode all the information required to predict the outcomes of experiments performed using that object. We often refer to objects as being “in” states, and that terminology is not limited to quantum physics. Get Chris Ferrie’s stories in your inbox Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer. Remember me for faster sign in It might be said that you are “in” a state of happiness. But this implies that happiness is a real objective thing or that states, in general, are objective things that objects transition through. But happiness is not objective. Happiness is really a shorthand concept for a bunch of expectations I should have for your actions, like that you will smile, laugh, and engage positively. Another abused two-letter word: is. We might ask, “what color is the apple?” We definitely don’t say, “if white light shines on this apple, I will perceive what I have been told is the sensation of redness.” No, we just say the apple “is” red, even though red isn’t a real physical state. For our everyday experiences, this is unproblematic, though google “pink is not a color,” and you’ll see that it’s not hard to find pedantry in just about anything. Quantum states are also not objective things that particles pass through — they are mathematical tools that help us understand and predict the behavior of quantum objects in various situations. There are basic states that predict intuitive things like, “if the position of the object is measured, it will definitely be found here” or “if the position of the object is measured, it will definitely be found there.” But, again, instead of writing out sentences that could quickly turn into paragraphs, we use a conceptual short-hand and say the object is “in” the state of being here or, simpler still, the object just “is” here, or there. It’s important to keep in mind that states are mathematical objects. The state summarized as “object is here” is actually a spreadsheet of numbers, as is the state summarized as “object is there.” Being made of numbers, we can easily imagine adding them together, giving us a new spreadsheet — a new state. This is a valid description of the object — it can be “in” this state. But what does this mean? Well, technically, nothing beyond what I’ve already said. This state is nothing but information that provides predictions for any experiment performed using the object. Of course, this is a deeply unsatisfying answer to you, as it has been to generations of physicists. It’s tempting to say that a superposition of the “here” and “there” states is a “here and there” state. Just as we simplified an object being described as “if the position of the object is measured, it will definitely be found here” to “the object is here,” most people simplify the superposition state to “the object is both here and there” — in two places at once! I hope you can see now that this is a ridiculous statement that could have been easily avoided had we not relied on oversimplified short-hand. Now is a good place to pause and reiterate that states are mathematical objects we assign to phenomena that we use in our theories to make predictions. Sometimes the states can faithfully be interpreted through analogies to everyday experiences. We make copious use of these analogies as they provide enormous conceptual economy. However, many states have no direct connection to our everyday experience. Using the typical analogies then quickly results in nonsensical statements and confusion. To be clear: an electron, say, is never “in two places at the same.” In fact, in such a superposition state, it is somewhat problematic to even be calling “it” an electron. Electrons are most often considered to be particles, which, if nothing else, have a definite location. The fact that electrons can be in superpositions of the “here” and “there” states forces us to revisit the idea that particles exist at all. There are no particles. There are only phenomena that occasionally behave “as if” they were particles. What is an electron in superposition, then? Information. Such a state provides information, heavily couched in the context of the rest of physics, that allows us to make accurate predictions about what will happen next. Now, if you have reductionist sympathies, you are likely open to the idea that everything, including the electron, the apple, and the state of happiness, is built up from billions upon billions of fundamental particles interacting according to the laws of physics. The universe is just a collection of particles arranged in various patterns, some of which happen to be very complex. But if I am just a collection of electrons and other particles, which can be in superposition states, why is it that I cannot? Why isn’t superposition a part of our day-to-day lives? ## Decoherence: Bridging Two Worlds When a quantum object is isolated, it can maintain its superposition state and exhibit all that strange and counterintuitive goodness we like to ascribe to the quantum world. However, as soon as it interacts with its surroundings, such as air molecules, dust particles, or even photons of light, it becomes entangled with the environment, and the superposition quickly deteriorates. The more complex the object, the more interactions it has with its environment and the faster the decoherence process unfolds. For example, a dust grain, floating in the dead of space, as far as possible from anything else, including starlight, would cease to be in a superposition of two locations separated by the width of the grain in less than a second. This is the standard story of how the quantum world gives way to the classical world. The problem with this story is that it just waves more quantum jargon in your face. Entanglement? Who ordered that? Imagine that dust grain again. Initially, suppose it is in one of the “object is here” states. Remember, this simple statement comes with a lot of implicit context. What it means is that if we were to perform an experiment that reveals the location of the dust grain, it would be found in one particular spot. Experiments and measurements are something we take for granted at human scales. One of the most confronting lessons quantum physics teaches us is that measurement requires some interaction with the object of investigation. It’s the context of that measurement that defines the possible outcomes that provide us with information. For example, superpositions of “here” and “there” are not among the possible states that can be observed if we arrange to measure the position of the dust grain. There are measurements, called interference experiments, that do reveal superposition states, but they are not “position” measurements, and they would be extremely difficult to perform. As noted, such an experiment would at least require an environment more extreme than deep space. Perhaps we will one day perform one of these interference experiments with an object that can be seen with the naked eye. However, there would be absolutely no sense in asking what the superposition states “looks” like because “looking” would necessitate a position measurement, which, again, does not have superposition states as its possible outcomes. The only thing such an experiment would look like is data shown to you on a screen — just more information. If the interactions between things and a dust grain did not provide information about its location, the superposition state would be maintained. However, the entire concept of location would also be irrelevant in such a situation. It’s the proliferation of location information that gives a “here and there” superposition state meaning and why it features in the theory at all. In effect, our everyday world is a collection of particles with locations because they all mutually encode position information of each other. If it were otherwise, we would not exist. Superposition is not miraculous. It’s the simple, classical “here” and “there” states that provide all the beauty and complexity of our experience. Quantum physics is really a theory about isolation, and it doesn’t apply to you — nor would you want it to.
Shard	77 (laksa)
Root Hash	13179037029838926277
Unparsed URL	com,medium!csferrie,/in-two-place-at-once-d0e02dc1e49 s443