🕷️ Crawler Inspector

URL Lookup

Direct Parameter Lookup

Raw Queries and Responses

1. Shard Calculation

Query:

Response:

Calculated Shard: 31 (from laksa132)

2. Crawled Status Check

Query:

curl -X POST \
  'http://laksa031.int.ahrefs:8124/' \
  -H 'Content-Type: text/plain' \
  -H 'X-ClickHouse-Database: crawler3' \
  -H 'Authorization: Basic YXBpOg==' \
  -d 'SELECT getAhrefsURLFromUnparsed(src_unparsed) AS found_url, ifNull(toUnixTimestamp(download_stamp), 0) AS crawl_time, ifNull(toUnixTimestamp(props_url_first_seen), 0) AS first_indexed_time, download_http_code AS http_code, src_unparsed AS src_unparsed, src_root_hash AS src_root_hash, history_drop_reason AS history_drop_reason, meta_title AS meta_title, meta_descriptions AS meta_descriptions, attrs_boilerpipe_text AS attrs_boilerpipe_text, attrs_markdown AS attrs_markdown, attrs_readable_markdown AS attrs_readable_markdown, meta_canonical AS meta_canonical FROM crawler3.page_info_local FINAL PREWHERE (src_root_hash, src_unparsed) IN ((getAhrefsRootHashFromUnparsed(getAhrefsUnparsedNoserviceFromURL(\'https://collateralbase.com/filibuster-and-federal-marijuana-legalization/\')), getAhrefsUnparsedNoserviceFromURL(\'https://collateralbase.com/filibuster-and-federal-marijuana-legalization/\'))) FORMAT JSONEachRow'

Response:

{"found_url":"https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/filibuster-and-federal-marijuana-legalization\/","crawl_time":1775774903,"first_indexed_time":1657154664,"http_code":200,"src_unparsed":"com,collateralbase!\/filibuster-and-federal-marijuana-legalization\/ s443","src_root_hash":"13144868163549979031","history_drop_reason":null,"meta_title":"Filibuster and Federal Marijuana Legalization: Why it won't happen in 2021","meta_descriptions":["Filibuster is a tactic employed in the U.S. Senate to prevent a measure from being brought to a vote, but how does this affect federal marijuana legalization?"],"attrs_boilerpipe_text":"Filibuster and federal marijuana legalization\nLast years have been very important for cannabis legalization. Currently,\nfifteen states\n, two territories and the District of Columbia have legalized cannabis for adult recreational use.\nNew York\nis the most recent state to legalize cannabis, which was passed in late March 2021, during New York’s 2021 session. \nAnd the road ahead seems promising for states Cannabis legalization, with states like\nVirginia\nor\nNew Mexico\nthat have proposed the implementation of recreational marijuana legalization bills that would establish a regulated commercial market. More and more states are taking the initiative to decriminalize or directly legalize recreational marijuana. \nHowever -on the other hand- federal legalization doesn’t look so favorable. Recently, Michigan urged Congress of the United States to clarify its position on the legality of marijuana under the Federal Controlled Substances Act. \nUnder federal law -unfortunately- marijuana is still a Schedule I illegal substance. And considering that there’s a 50-50 split in the 117\nth\nU.S. Congress, federal legalization probably won’t be happening anytime soon, as the Republicans would be able to repeal it by filibustering.\nWhat’s a Filibuster?\nA Filibuster, according to the\nUnited States Senate’s glossary\n, is an “informal term for any attempt to block or delay Senate action on a bill or other matter by debating it at length, by offering numerous procedural motions, or by any other delating or obstructive actions”.\nThe most common form of filibuster occurs when one or more senators attempt to delay or block a vote on a bill by extending debate on the measure. The Senate rules permit a senator, or a series of senators, to speak for as long as they wish, and on any topic they choose, unless “three-fifths of the Senators duly chosen and sworn” (currently 60 out of 100) vote to bring the debate to a close by invoking cloture -AKA: a motion to end a debate- under Senate Rule XXII.\nHowever, today -even though the filibuster is more common than ever- it is not necessary for a senator to talk for hours to maintain a filibuster. Nowadays, all it takes to perform a filibuster is for a senator to state his intention to launch a filibuster against a bill or motion. \nImmediately after the senator’s intention is stated, a vote has to be taken, and only after getting at least 60 votes any action could be taken on the matter, getting less than 60 votes would mean the bill or motion got blocked. \nIt can be described -basically- as a move in which senators demand a supermajority to cut off debate and move to an actual vote.\nFor a quick assessment of your needs – let’s talk to discuss how Trusts can help your business.\nHistory of the Filibuster\nBeing able to block a measure through extended debate was generated as a side effect of an 1806 rule change. \nThis tactic was infrequently used during much of the 19th and 20th centuries. In 1970, the Senate adopted a “two-track” procedure to prevent filibusters from stopping all other Senate business and thus . \nThe minority then felt politically safer in \nthreatening\n filibusters more regularly, which became normalized over time to the point that 60 votes are now required to end debate on nearly every controversial legislative item.\nLaws that expressly restrict the time for Senate discussion, such as the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 -which established the budget reconciliation mechanism- have been used to limit the procedure. \nChanges in 2013 and 2017 now require only a simple majority to invoke cloture on nominations, although most legislation still requires 60 votes. Although \none or more senators can still hold the floor for a prolonged period of time on occasion, often without the Senate leadership’s knowledge. \nHowever, since the Senate’s ability to act eventually depends on whether there are enough votes to invoke cloture and proceed to a final vote on passage, these “filibusters” generally only cause small delays and have little influence on the outcome.\nFilibustering was actually created by accident in 1806. In 1789, the first U.S. Senate adopted rules allowing senators to move the previous question by simple majority vote, which meant ending the debate and proceeding to vote. \nAt that time, Vice President Aaron Burr argued that the previous-question motion was redundant, had only been exercised once in the preceding four years and, therefore, it should be eliminated, which was done in 1806.\nThese changes on the Senate’s rules made filibustering possible, as it didn’t create another alternative to terminate the debate.\nThe senate allowed the tactic to be used until more than a century later, in 1917, when -during World War I- a rule allowing cloture of a debate was adopted by the Senate after the urging of President Woodrow Wilson, after a group of 12 anti-war senators managed to kill a bill that would have allowed Wilson to arm merchant vessels in the face of unrestricted German submarine warfare. \nFrom 1917 to 1949, the requirements for cloture were two-thirds of the senators voting. During this period of time, there were times where politicians recited Shakespeare and read out recipes for hours at a time, some of them occupying as long as 15 hours of debate. \nIn 1949 the Senate made invoking cloture even more difficult by requiring two-thirds of the entire Senate membership to vote in favor of a cloture motion. Then, ten years later, in 1959 -anticipating more civil rights legislation- the Senate restored the cloture threshold to two-thirds of those voting.\nIn 1970 the Senate introduced a “two-track system”, which would allow the majority leader -with unanimous consent or the agreement of the minority leader- to have more than one main motion pending on the floor as unfinished business. \nUnder this system, the Senate can have two or more pieces of legislation or nominations pending on the floor simultaneously by designating specific periods during the day when each one will be considered.\nFilibusters became easier for the minority to retain as a result of this change. This also led to the modern era in which an effective supermajority requirement exists to pass legislation,\nwith no practical requirement that the minority party actually hold the floor or extend debate\n.\nIn 1975, the Senate revised its cloture rule so that three-fifths of sworn senators (60 votes out of 100) could limit debate, except for changing Senate rules which still requires a two-thirds majority of those present and voting to invoke cloture. \nHowever, by returning to an absolute number of all Senators (60) rather than a proportion of those present and voting, the change also made any filibusters easier to sustain on the floor by a small number of senators from the minority party without requiring the presence of their minority colleagues. \nThis further reduced the majority’s leverage to force an issue through extended debate.\nExceptions for the Filibuster\nThere are some bills that are not subject to the effective 60-vote requirements. These are bills that -under provisions of law- have a limited time for debating them. These limits on debate allow the Senate to hold a simple-majority vote on final passage without obtaining the 60 votes normally needed to close debate:\nBudget reconciliation\n.\nExpedites the passage of certain budgetary legislation.\nTrade promotion authority\n. Gives authority to the President to negotiate international trade agreements in a “fast track”\nCongressional review act\n. Allows Congress to review and repeal administrative regulations adopted by the Executive Branch within 60 legislative days.\nNational emergencies act\n. Formalizes the emergency powers of the President.\nWar powers resolution\n. Generally, requires the President to withdraw troops committed overseas within 60 days, which the President may extend once for 30 additional days. \nHow to end a Filibuster\nAs of today, according to the rules set for debate in the United States Senate,\n60 votes are needed to end a filibuster\n. Once the debate is closed, senators can move forward with consideration of the measure, amendments or final votes. \nThe issue is that, nowadays, with the Congress split in half, this isn’t possible, as the Republicans are unlikely to vote against the filibuster. And what’s even more, Democrats would have to tread lightly this session, to ensure they don’t upset the Republicans, as doing so could cost any chance at passing even the smallest reform. \nHow could the Democrats kill the filibuster and what’s the “Nuclear Option”?\nAnother option that the Democrats have in order to pass federal legalization would be the so-called “nuclear option”.\nThe “nuclear option” is a parliamentary procedure that allows the Senate to override a standing rule of the Senate, such as the three-fifths vote rule to close debate, by a simple majority.\nThe option is invoked when the majority leader raises a point of order that contravenes a standing rule. The term “nuclear option” is an analogy to nuclear weapons being the most extreme option. \nThe “nuclear option” would allow the Senate to override one of its standing rules, including the 60-vote rule to\n \nclose debate\n, by a simple majority (51+ votes or 50 votes with the Vice President casting the tie-breaking vote), rather than the two-thirds\n \nsupermajority\n \nnormally required to amend the rules. To this day, the “nuclear option” has never been used to kill the filibuster. \nIn this sense, it would be possible for the Democrats to change the rules for the filibuster. However, Senate minority leader, Mitch McConnell doesn’t want the filibuster to die, and has decided to not negotiate with Democrats until they agree to keep it in play. \nIn the current state of the Senate, where there’s a 50\/50 division, it would be fairly complicated to change these rules, as the Senate would need -at least- 51 votes, which means that\nevery single Democrat\nwould need to be on board\nto change the rules, which can be a bit tricky, as there are some of them who have -openly- been in favor of filibuster in the past.\nWhat’s even more, let’s say that the Democrats find a way to eradicate the filibuster and start passing bills on marijuana legalization. According to Sen. McConnell, this could lead to a situation where any marijuana reform bill passed under Democratic control would just end up tossed off the books once Republicans take back the power.\n“\nWhen Republicans next control the government, we’d be able to repeal every bill that had just been rammed through. But a few years later, Democrats would try to flip it all back. So instead of building stable consensus, we’d be chaotically swapping party platforms\n.” – Sen. Mitch McConnell\nFrom this point of view, it wouldn’t be the smartest idea to kill the filibuster as it would possibly take away the possibilities of legalizing cannabis on a federal level in an effective -and durable- way. \nIt could take away the possibilities of passing any kind of reform the Biden administration would want to pass.\nAnd with the landscape being the way it is, It seems like federal legalization won’t be occurring any time soon.\nFor a quick assessment of your needs – let’s talk to discuss how Trusts can help your business.\nWhether this is your first land use issue or most recent, our office has helped people and businesses alike.\nThomas Howard was on the ball and got things done. Easy to work with, communicates very well, and I would recommend him anytime.","attrs_markdown":"![](https:\/\/px.ads.linkedin.com\/collect\/?pid=4052524&fmt=gif)\n\n[Skip to content](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/filibuster-and-federal-marijuana-legalization\/#content)\n\n[![](https:\/\/storage.googleapis.com\/msgsndr\/sW7jiEzOSaEnERWigeMa\/media\/66428808863715ecd1b167e0.png)](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/)\n\n- [Business Consulting](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/business-consulting\/)\n  - [Expert Consultation — \\$200](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/consultation\/)\n  - [Cannabis Consultants](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/cannabis-consultants\/)\n  - [Social Equity](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/social-equity\/)\n  - [How to Sell Your Cannabis License](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/how-to-sell-your-cannabis-license-important-considerations\/)\n- [About Us](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/about-us\/)\n  - [Sergio Barraza-Ingstrom](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/sergio-barraza-ingstrom\/)\n  - [Adam Dalton](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/adam-dalton\/)\n  - [Thomas Howard](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/thomas-howard\/)\n\n- [Business Consulting](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/business-consulting\/)\n  - [Expert Consultation — \\$200](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/consultation\/)\n  - [Cannabis Consultants](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/cannabis-consultants\/)\n  - [Social Equity](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/social-equity\/)\n  - [How to Sell Your Cannabis License](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/how-to-sell-your-cannabis-license-important-considerations\/)\n- [About Us](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/about-us\/)\n  - [Sergio Barraza-Ingstrom](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/sergio-barraza-ingstrom\/)\n  - [Adam Dalton](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/adam-dalton\/)\n  - [Thomas Howard](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/thomas-howard\/)\n\n[Get Help Now](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/consultation\/)\n\n[![](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Collateral-Base-Logo-Design-March2024-1-e1711657050922-1.webp)](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/)\n\n- [Business Consulting](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/business-consulting\/)\n  - [Expert Consultation — \\$200](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/consultation\/)\n  - [Cannabis Consultants](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/cannabis-consultants\/)\n  - [Social Equity](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/social-equity\/)\n  - [How to Sell Your Cannabis License](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/how-to-sell-your-cannabis-license-important-considerations\/)\n- [About Us](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/about-us\/)\n  - [Sergio Barraza-Ingstrom](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/sergio-barraza-ingstrom\/)\n  - [Adam Dalton](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/adam-dalton\/)\n  - [Thomas Howard](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/thomas-howard\/)\n\n- [Business Consulting](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/business-consulting\/)\n  - [Expert Consultation — \\$200](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/consultation\/)\n  - [Cannabis Consultants](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/cannabis-consultants\/)\n  - [Social Equity](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/social-equity\/)\n  - [How to Sell Your Cannabis License](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/how-to-sell-your-cannabis-license-important-considerations\/)\n- [About Us](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/about-us\/)\n  - [Sergio Barraza-Ingstrom](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/sergio-barraza-ingstrom\/)\n  - [Adam Dalton](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/adam-dalton\/)\n  - [Thomas Howard](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/thomas-howard\/)\n\n[Get in Touch](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/consultation\/)\n\n# Filibuster and Federal Marijuana Legalization\n![Filibuster and Federal Marijuana Legalization](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Filibuster-and-Federal-Marijuana-Legalization-1024x683.webp)\n\n## **Filibuster and federal marijuana legalization**\nLast years have been very important for cannabis legalization. Currently, [fifteen states](https:\/\/www.cannabisindustrylawyer.com\/map-of-marijuana-legality-by-state\/), two territories and the District of Columbia have legalized cannabis for adult recreational use. [New York](https:\/\/www.cannabisindustrylawyer.com\/new-york-cannabis-license-application\/) is the most recent state to legalize cannabis, which was passed in late March 2021, during New York’s 2021 session.\n\nAnd the road ahead seems promising for states Cannabis legalization, with states like [Virginia](https:\/\/cannabisindustrylawyer.com\/how-to-open-a-dispensary-in-virginia\/) or [New Mexico](https:\/\/www.cannabisindustrylawyer.com\/new-mexico-cannabis-license\/) that have proposed the implementation of recreational marijuana legalization bills that would establish a regulated commercial market. More and more states are taking the initiative to decriminalize or directly legalize recreational marijuana.\n\nHowever -on the other hand- federal legalization doesn’t look so favorable. Recently, Michigan urged Congress of the United States to clarify its position on the legality of marijuana under the Federal Controlled Substances Act.\n\nUnder federal law -unfortunately- marijuana is still a Schedule I illegal substance. And considering that there’s a 50-50 split in the 117th U.S. Congress, federal legalization probably won’t be happening anytime soon, as the Republicans would be able to repeal it by filibustering.\n\n## **What’s a Filibuster?**\nA Filibuster, according to the [United States Senate’s glossary](https:\/\/www.senate.gov\/reference\/glossary_term\/filibuster.htm), is an “informal term for any attempt to block or delay Senate action on a bill or other matter by debating it at length, by offering numerous procedural motions, or by any other delating or obstructive actions”.\n\nThe most common form of filibuster occurs when one or more senators attempt to delay or block a vote on a bill by extending debate on the measure. The Senate rules permit a senator, or a series of senators, to speak for as long as they wish, and on any topic they choose, unless “three-fifths of the Senators duly chosen and sworn” (currently 60 out of 100) vote to bring the debate to a close by invoking cloture -AKA: a motion to end a debate- under Senate Rule XXII.\n\nHowever, today -even though the filibuster is more common than ever- it is not necessary for a senator to talk for hours to maintain a filibuster. Nowadays, all it takes to perform a filibuster is for a senator to state his intention to launch a filibuster against a bill or motion.\n\nImmediately after the senator’s intention is stated, a vote has to be taken, and only after getting at least 60 votes any action could be taken on the matter, getting less than 60 votes would mean the bill or motion got blocked.\n\nIt can be described -basically- as a move in which senators demand a supermajority to cut off debate and move to an actual vote.\n\nFor a quick assessment of your needs – let’s talk to discuss how Trusts can help your business.\n\n## **History of the Filibuster**\nBeing able to block a measure through extended debate was generated as a side effect of an 1806 rule change.\n\nThis tactic was infrequently used during much of the 19th and 20th centuries. In 1970, the Senate adopted a “two-track” procedure to prevent filibusters from stopping all other Senate business and thus .\n\nThe minority then felt politically safer in *threatening* filibusters more regularly, which became normalized over time to the point that 60 votes are now required to end debate on nearly every controversial legislative item.\n\nLaws that expressly restrict the time for Senate discussion, such as the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 -which established the budget reconciliation mechanism- have been used to limit the procedure.\n\nChanges in 2013 and 2017 now require only a simple majority to invoke cloture on nominations, although most legislation still requires 60 votes. Although one or more senators can still hold the floor for a prolonged period of time on occasion, often without the Senate leadership’s knowledge.\n\nHowever, since the Senate’s ability to act eventually depends on whether there are enough votes to invoke cloture and proceed to a final vote on passage, these “filibusters” generally only cause small delays and have little influence on the outcome.\n\nFilibustering was actually created by accident in 1806. In 1789, the first U.S. Senate adopted rules allowing senators to move the previous question by simple majority vote, which meant ending the debate and proceeding to vote.\n\nAt that time, Vice President Aaron Burr argued that the previous-question motion was redundant, had only been exercised once in the preceding four years and, therefore, it should be eliminated, which was done in 1806.\n\nThese changes on the Senate’s rules made filibustering possible, as it didn’t create another alternative to terminate the debate.\n\nThe senate allowed the tactic to be used until more than a century later, in 1917, when -during World War I- a rule allowing cloture of a debate was adopted by the Senate after the urging of President Woodrow Wilson, after a group of 12 anti-war senators managed to kill a bill that would have allowed Wilson to arm merchant vessels in the face of unrestricted German submarine warfare.\n\nFrom 1917 to 1949, the requirements for cloture were two-thirds of the senators voting. During this period of time, there were times where politicians recited Shakespeare and read out recipes for hours at a time, some of them occupying as long as 15 hours of debate.\n\nIn 1949 the Senate made invoking cloture even more difficult by requiring two-thirds of the entire Senate membership to vote in favor of a cloture motion. Then, ten years later, in 1959 -anticipating more civil rights legislation- the Senate restored the cloture threshold to two-thirds of those voting.\n\nIn 1970 the Senate introduced a “two-track system”, which would allow the majority leader -with unanimous consent or the agreement of the minority leader- to have more than one main motion pending on the floor as unfinished business.\n\nUnder this system, the Senate can have two or more pieces of legislation or nominations pending on the floor simultaneously by designating specific periods during the day when each one will be considered.\n\nFilibusters became easier for the minority to retain as a result of this change. This also led to the modern era in which an effective supermajority requirement exists to pass legislation, **with no practical requirement that the minority party actually hold the floor or extend debate**.\n\nIn 1975, the Senate revised its cloture rule so that three-fifths of sworn senators (60 votes out of 100) could limit debate, except for changing Senate rules which still requires a two-thirds majority of those present and voting to invoke cloture.\n\nHowever, by returning to an absolute number of all Senators (60) rather than a proportion of those present and voting, the change also made any filibusters easier to sustain on the floor by a small number of senators from the minority party without requiring the presence of their minority colleagues.\n\nThis further reduced the majority’s leverage to force an issue through extended debate.\n\n### **Exceptions for the Filibuster**\nThere are some bills that are not subject to the effective 60-vote requirements. These are bills that -under provisions of law- have a limited time for debating them. These limits on debate allow the Senate to hold a simple-majority vote on final passage without obtaining the 60 votes normally needed to close debate:\n\n- **Budget reconciliation**. Expedites the passage of certain budgetary legislation.\n- **Trade promotion authority**. Gives authority to the President to negotiate international trade agreements in a “fast track”\n- **Congressional review act**. Allows Congress to review and repeal administrative regulations adopted by the Executive Branch within 60 legislative days.\n- **National emergencies act**. Formalizes the emergency powers of the President.\n- **War powers resolution**. Generally, requires the President to withdraw troops committed overseas within 60 days, which the President may extend once for 30 additional days.\n### **How to end a Filibuster**\nAs of today, according to the rules set for debate in the United States Senate, **60 votes are needed to end a filibuster**. Once the debate is closed, senators can move forward with consideration of the measure, amendments or final votes.\n\nThe issue is that, nowadays, with the Congress split in half, this isn’t possible, as the Republicans are unlikely to vote against the filibuster. And what’s even more, Democrats would have to tread lightly this session, to ensure they don’t upset the Republicans, as doing so could cost any chance at passing even the smallest reform.\n\n## **How could the Democrats kill the filibuster and what’s the “Nuclear Option”?**\nAnother option that the Democrats have in order to pass federal legalization would be the so-called “nuclear option”.\n\nThe “nuclear option” is a parliamentary procedure that allows the Senate to override a standing rule of the Senate, such as the three-fifths vote rule to close debate, by a simple majority.\n\nThe option is invoked when the majority leader raises a point of order that contravenes a standing rule. The term “nuclear option” is an analogy to nuclear weapons being the most extreme option.\n\nThe “nuclear option” would allow the Senate to override one of its standing rules, including the 60-vote rule to close debate, by a simple majority (51+ votes or 50 votes with the Vice President casting the tie-breaking vote), rather than the two-thirds supermajority normally required to amend the rules. To this day, the “nuclear option” has never been used to kill the filibuster.\n\nIn this sense, it would be possible for the Democrats to change the rules for the filibuster. However, Senate minority leader, Mitch McConnell doesn’t want the filibuster to die, and has decided to not negotiate with Democrats until they agree to keep it in play.\n\nIn the current state of the Senate, where there’s a 50\/50 division, it would be fairly complicated to change these rules, as the Senate would need -at least- 51 votes, which means that **every single Democrat** **would need to be on board** to change the rules, which can be a bit tricky, as there are some of them who have -openly- been in favor of filibuster in the past.\n\nWhat’s even more, let’s say that the Democrats find a way to eradicate the filibuster and start passing bills on marijuana legalization. According to Sen. McConnell, this could lead to a situation where any marijuana reform bill passed under Democratic control would just end up tossed off the books once Republicans take back the power.\n\n> “*When Republicans next control the government, we’d be able to repeal every bill that had just been rammed through. But a few years later, Democrats would try to flip it all back. So instead of building stable consensus, we’d be chaotically swapping party platforms*.” – Sen. Mitch McConnell\n\nFrom this point of view, it wouldn’t be the smartest idea to kill the filibuster as it would possibly take away the possibilities of legalizing cannabis on a federal level in an effective -and durable- way.\n\nIt could take away the possibilities of passing any kind of reform the Biden administration would want to pass.\n\nAnd with the landscape being the way it is, It seems like federal legalization won’t be occurring any time soon.\n\nFor a quick assessment of your needs – let’s talk to discuss how Trusts can help your business.\n\nWhether this is your first land use issue or most recent, our office has helped people and businesses alike.\n\nThomas Howard was on the ball and got things done. Easy to work with, communicates very well, and I would recommend him anytime.\n\n[![Picture of Diego](https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/62cec947e5272be1bf8b3c81291a9c01617faddc3bc44f4fc5357e3467ad7908?s=300&d=mm&r=g)](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/author\/diego\/)\n\n[Diego](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/author\/diego\/)\n\n## Can We Help Your Business?\nGet in touch with us about what you are looking for and we’ll let you know if we can help and how much we think it will cost.\n\n[Lets talk](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/filibuster-and-federal-marijuana-legalization\/#elementor-action%3Aaction%3Dpopup%3Aopen%26settings%3DeyJpZCI6IjIyNzUxNyIsInRvZ2dsZSI6ZmFsc2V9)\n\n#### Table of Contents\n##### Recent Posts\n- [Virginia Cannabis Dispensary License 2026: Application Requirements & Scoring Guide](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/virginia-cannabis-dispensary-license-2026-application-requirements-scoring-guide\/)\n- [What a Cannabis License Consultant Actually Does (And Why It Matters)](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/cannabis-license-consultant\/)\n- [APA vs. MIPA in Cannabis: Which Deal Structure Wins?](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/apa-vs-mipa-cannabis\/)\n- [Cannabis Business Valuation: What Buyers and Sellers Need to Know](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/cannabis-business-valuation\/)\n- [Virginia Cannabis Processing License 2026: Requirements, Costs, and Application Readiness](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/virginia-cannabis-processing-license-2026\/)\n- [Virginia Cannabis Cultivation License 2026: Requirements, Costs & Readiness Plan](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/virginia-cannabis-cultivation-license-2026\/)\n- [Virginia Cannabis Microbusiness License 2026: Requirements + Readiness Plan](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/virginia-cannabis-microbusiness-license-2026\/)\n- [Virginia Dispensary Financial Model (2026): Complete Pro Forma + Runway Plan](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/virginia-dispensary-financial-model-2026\/)\n- [Virginia Dispensary Pro Forma & Runway Model (2026): Budget Ranges, Burn Rate, and the ‘Lean → Loud’ Launch Plan](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/virginia-cannabis-dispensary-license-2026-application\/)\n- [Virginia cannabis dispensary license 2026 site + locality strategy](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/virginia-dispensary-site-selection-2026\/)\n\n## Related Posts\n### [Virginia Cannabis Dispensary License 2026: Application Requirements & Scoring Guide](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/virginia-cannabis-dispensary-license-2026-application-requirements-scoring-guide\/)\nIntroduction: Why Virginia’s 2026 Retail Round Matters Updated March 2026: SB 542\/HB 642 passed the Virginia General Assembly on March 14, 2026. Applications open by\n\n[Read More »](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/virginia-cannabis-dispensary-license-2026-application-requirements-scoring-guide\/)\n\n[![cannabis license consultant](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/cannabis-license-consultant-300x200.webp)](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/cannabis-license-consultant\/)\n\n![Thomas Howard](https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c8b35e16c96069ead3e06a606444296b8058f7c0f542d86e4e21603b44848410?s=128&d=mm&r=g)\n\n### [What a Cannabis License Consultant Actually Does (And Why It Matters)](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/cannabis-license-consultant\/)\nMost cannabis license applications are not rejected because the applicant lacked capital or commitment. They are rejected because a security plan was missing a required\n\n[Read More »](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/cannabis-license-consultant\/)\n\n[![apa vs mipa](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/apa-vs-mipa-cannabis-300x200.webp)](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/apa-vs-mipa-cannabis\/)\n\n![Thomas Howard](https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/c8b35e16c96069ead3e06a606444296b8058f7c0f542d86e4e21603b44848410?s=128&d=mm&r=g)\n\n### [APA vs. MIPA in Cannabis: Which Deal Structure Wins?](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/apa-vs-mipa-cannabis\/)\nEvery cannabis acquisition comes down to a fundamental structural choice: buy the assets, or buy the entity. An Asset Purchase Agreement (APA) transfers specified assets\n\n[Read More »](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/apa-vs-mipa-cannabis\/)\n\nCopyright 2023 © \\| All rights Reserved\n\n- [PRIVACY POLICY](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/privacy-policy\/)\n- [TERMS OF USE](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/terms-of-use\/)\n- [SITE MAP](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/site-maps\/)\n- [DISCLAIMER](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/disclaimer\/)\n\nDeveloped By [WorldWin Coder Pvt Ltd](https:\/\/worldwincoder.com\/) & [Stumari](https:\/\/www.stumari.co\/)\n\n[![](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/Mask-group.webp)](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/)\n\nElevating your business strategies with expert guidance and tailored solutions.\n\n## Quick Links\n- [Business Consulting](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/business-consulting\/)\n  - [Expert Consultation — \\$200](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/consultation\/)\n  - [Cannabis Consultants](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/cannabis-consultants\/)\n  - [Social Equity](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/social-equity\/)\n  - [How to Sell Your Cannabis License](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/how-to-sell-your-cannabis-license-important-considerations\/)\n- [About Us](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/about-us\/)\n  - [Sergio Barraza-Ingstrom](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/sergio-barraza-ingstrom\/)\n  - [Adam Dalton](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/adam-dalton\/)\n  - [Thomas Howard](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/thomas-howard\/)\n\n- [Business Consulting](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/business-consulting\/)\n  - [Expert Consultation — \\$200](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/consultation\/)\n  - [Cannabis Consultants](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/cannabis-consultants\/)\n  - [Social Equity](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/social-equity\/)\n  - [How to Sell Your Cannabis License](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/how-to-sell-your-cannabis-license-important-considerations\/)\n- [About Us](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/about-us\/)\n  - [Sergio Barraza-Ingstrom](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/sergio-barraza-ingstrom\/)\n  - [Adam Dalton](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/adam-dalton\/)\n  - [Thomas Howard](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/thomas-howard\/)\n\n- [About](https:\/\/collateralbdev.wpenginepowered.com\/about-us\/)\n- [Business Consulting](https:\/\/collateralbdev.wpenginepowered.com\/business-consulting\/)\n- [Licensing Consulting](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/filibuster-and-federal-marijuana-legalization\/)\n- [Social Equity](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/filibuster-and-federal-marijuana-legalization\/)\n- [Dispute Resolution](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/filibuster-and-federal-marijuana-legalization\/)\n\n## Get In Touch\n- [\\[email protected\\]](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/cdn-cgi\/l\/email-protection#c4b0aba984a7aba8a8a5b0a1b6a5a8a6a5b7a1eaa7aba9)\n- [456 Fulton St. Ste. 404 Peoria, IL 61602 USA](https:\/\/maps.app.goo.gl\/UDCsVe6ogzAy1ZQU6)\n- [\\+1 866-485-4880](tel:833-952-3111)\n\n## Social Media\n[Facebook](https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/collateralbase\/)\n\n[Instagram](https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/collateralbase\/)\n\n[Youtube](https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@CannabisLegalizationNews)\n\n[Linkedin]()\n\n© Copyright 2025 \\| CollateralBase\n\nDeveloped By [WorldWin Coder Pvt Ltd](https:\/\/worldwincoder.com\/) & [Stumari](https:\/\/www.stumari.co\/)\n\n- [Terms of Use](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/terms-of-use\/)\n- [Disclaimer](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/disclaimer\/)\n- [Privacy Policy](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/privacy-policy\/)\n\n![Collateral Base \\| Cannabis Consultants](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/cropped-CBBlueYellow-1-1-150x150.webp)\n\n## Talk to a Cannabis Business Expert\n30 minutes. \\$200 (credited toward your engagement). One call can change your trajectory.\n\n[Book My Expert Consultation →](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/consultation\/#form)\n\nNo long forms. Just pick a time that works.","attrs_readable_markdown":"![Filibuster and Federal Marijuana Legalization](https:\/\/collateralbase.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/04\/Filibuster-and-Federal-Marijuana-Legalization-1024x683.webp)\n\n## **Filibuster and federal marijuana legalization**\nLast years have been very important for cannabis legalization. Currently, [fifteen states](https:\/\/www.cannabisindustrylawyer.com\/map-of-marijuana-legality-by-state\/), two territories and the District of Columbia have legalized cannabis for adult recreational use. [New York](https:\/\/www.cannabisindustrylawyer.com\/new-york-cannabis-license-application\/) is the most recent state to legalize cannabis, which was passed in late March 2021, during New York’s 2021 session.\n\nAnd the road ahead seems promising for states Cannabis legalization, with states like [Virginia](https:\/\/cannabisindustrylawyer.com\/how-to-open-a-dispensary-in-virginia\/) or [New Mexico](https:\/\/www.cannabisindustrylawyer.com\/new-mexico-cannabis-license\/) that have proposed the implementation of recreational marijuana legalization bills that would establish a regulated commercial market. More and more states are taking the initiative to decriminalize or directly legalize recreational marijuana.\n\nHowever -on the other hand- federal legalization doesn’t look so favorable. Recently, Michigan urged Congress of the United States to clarify its position on the legality of marijuana under the Federal Controlled Substances Act.\n\nUnder federal law -unfortunately- marijuana is still a Schedule I illegal substance. And considering that there’s a 50-50 split in the 117th U.S. Congress, federal legalization probably won’t be happening anytime soon, as the Republicans would be able to repeal it by filibustering.\n\n## **What’s a Filibuster?**\nA Filibuster, according to the [United States Senate’s glossary](https:\/\/www.senate.gov\/reference\/glossary_term\/filibuster.htm), is an “informal term for any attempt to block or delay Senate action on a bill or other matter by debating it at length, by offering numerous procedural motions, or by any other delating or obstructive actions”.\n\nThe most common form of filibuster occurs when one or more senators attempt to delay or block a vote on a bill by extending debate on the measure. The Senate rules permit a senator, or a series of senators, to speak for as long as they wish, and on any topic they choose, unless “three-fifths of the Senators duly chosen and sworn” (currently 60 out of 100) vote to bring the debate to a close by invoking cloture -AKA: a motion to end a debate- under Senate Rule XXII.\n\nHowever, today -even though the filibuster is more common than ever- it is not necessary for a senator to talk for hours to maintain a filibuster. Nowadays, all it takes to perform a filibuster is for a senator to state his intention to launch a filibuster against a bill or motion.\n\nImmediately after the senator’s intention is stated, a vote has to be taken, and only after getting at least 60 votes any action could be taken on the matter, getting less than 60 votes would mean the bill or motion got blocked.\n\nIt can be described -basically- as a move in which senators demand a supermajority to cut off debate and move to an actual vote.\n\nFor a quick assessment of your needs – let’s talk to discuss how Trusts can help your business.\n\n## **History of the Filibuster**\nBeing able to block a measure through extended debate was generated as a side effect of an 1806 rule change.\n\nThis tactic was infrequently used during much of the 19th and 20th centuries. In 1970, the Senate adopted a “two-track” procedure to prevent filibusters from stopping all other Senate business and thus .\n\nThe minority then felt politically safer in *threatening* filibusters more regularly, which became normalized over time to the point that 60 votes are now required to end debate on nearly every controversial legislative item.\n\nLaws that expressly restrict the time for Senate discussion, such as the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 -which established the budget reconciliation mechanism- have been used to limit the procedure.\n\nChanges in 2013 and 2017 now require only a simple majority to invoke cloture on nominations, although most legislation still requires 60 votes. Although one or more senators can still hold the floor for a prolonged period of time on occasion, often without the Senate leadership’s knowledge.\n\nHowever, since the Senate’s ability to act eventually depends on whether there are enough votes to invoke cloture and proceed to a final vote on passage, these “filibusters” generally only cause small delays and have little influence on the outcome.\n\nFilibustering was actually created by accident in 1806. In 1789, the first U.S. Senate adopted rules allowing senators to move the previous question by simple majority vote, which meant ending the debate and proceeding to vote.\n\nAt that time, Vice President Aaron Burr argued that the previous-question motion was redundant, had only been exercised once in the preceding four years and, therefore, it should be eliminated, which was done in 1806.\n\nThese changes on the Senate’s rules made filibustering possible, as it didn’t create another alternative to terminate the debate.\n\nThe senate allowed the tactic to be used until more than a century later, in 1917, when -during World War I- a rule allowing cloture of a debate was adopted by the Senate after the urging of President Woodrow Wilson, after a group of 12 anti-war senators managed to kill a bill that would have allowed Wilson to arm merchant vessels in the face of unrestricted German submarine warfare.\n\nFrom 1917 to 1949, the requirements for cloture were two-thirds of the senators voting. During this period of time, there were times where politicians recited Shakespeare and read out recipes for hours at a time, some of them occupying as long as 15 hours of debate.\n\nIn 1949 the Senate made invoking cloture even more difficult by requiring two-thirds of the entire Senate membership to vote in favor of a cloture motion. Then, ten years later, in 1959 -anticipating more civil rights legislation- the Senate restored the cloture threshold to two-thirds of those voting.\n\nIn 1970 the Senate introduced a “two-track system”, which would allow the majority leader -with unanimous consent or the agreement of the minority leader- to have more than one main motion pending on the floor as unfinished business.\n\nUnder this system, the Senate can have two or more pieces of legislation or nominations pending on the floor simultaneously by designating specific periods during the day when each one will be considered.\n\nFilibusters became easier for the minority to retain as a result of this change. This also led to the modern era in which an effective supermajority requirement exists to pass legislation, **with no practical requirement that the minority party actually hold the floor or extend debate**.\n\nIn 1975, the Senate revised its cloture rule so that three-fifths of sworn senators (60 votes out of 100) could limit debate, except for changing Senate rules which still requires a two-thirds majority of those present and voting to invoke cloture.\n\nHowever, by returning to an absolute number of all Senators (60) rather than a proportion of those present and voting, the change also made any filibusters easier to sustain on the floor by a small number of senators from the minority party without requiring the presence of their minority colleagues.\n\nThis further reduced the majority’s leverage to force an issue through extended debate.\n\n### **Exceptions for the Filibuster**\nThere are some bills that are not subject to the effective 60-vote requirements. These are bills that -under provisions of law- have a limited time for debating them. These limits on debate allow the Senate to hold a simple-majority vote on final passage without obtaining the 60 votes normally needed to close debate:\n\n- **Budget reconciliation**. Expedites the passage of certain budgetary legislation.\n- **Trade promotion authority**. Gives authority to the President to negotiate international trade agreements in a “fast track”\n- **Congressional review act**. Allows Congress to review and repeal administrative regulations adopted by the Executive Branch within 60 legislative days.\n- **National emergencies act**. Formalizes the emergency powers of the President.\n- **War powers resolution**. Generally, requires the President to withdraw troops committed overseas within 60 days, which the President may extend once for 30 additional days.\n### **How to end a Filibuster**\nAs of today, according to the rules set for debate in the United States Senate, **60 votes are needed to end a filibuster**. Once the debate is closed, senators can move forward with consideration of the measure, amendments or final votes.\n\nThe issue is that, nowadays, with the Congress split in half, this isn’t possible, as the Republicans are unlikely to vote against the filibuster. And what’s even more, Democrats would have to tread lightly this session, to ensure they don’t upset the Republicans, as doing so could cost any chance at passing even the smallest reform.\n\n## **How could the Democrats kill the filibuster and what’s the “Nuclear Option”?**\nAnother option that the Democrats have in order to pass federal legalization would be the so-called “nuclear option”.\n\nThe “nuclear option” is a parliamentary procedure that allows the Senate to override a standing rule of the Senate, such as the three-fifths vote rule to close debate, by a simple majority.\n\nThe option is invoked when the majority leader raises a point of order that contravenes a standing rule. The term “nuclear option” is an analogy to nuclear weapons being the most extreme option.\n\nThe “nuclear option” would allow the Senate to override one of its standing rules, including the 60-vote rule to close debate, by a simple majority (51+ votes or 50 votes with the Vice President casting the tie-breaking vote), rather than the two-thirds supermajority normally required to amend the rules. To this day, the “nuclear option” has never been used to kill the filibuster.\n\nIn this sense, it would be possible for the Democrats to change the rules for the filibuster. However, Senate minority leader, Mitch McConnell doesn’t want the filibuster to die, and has decided to not negotiate with Democrats until they agree to keep it in play.\n\nIn the current state of the Senate, where there’s a 50\/50 division, it would be fairly complicated to change these rules, as the Senate would need -at least- 51 votes, which means that **every single Democrat** **would need to be on board** to change the rules, which can be a bit tricky, as there are some of them who have -openly- been in favor of filibuster in the past.\n\nWhat’s even more, let’s say that the Democrats find a way to eradicate the filibuster and start passing bills on marijuana legalization. According to Sen. McConnell, this could lead to a situation where any marijuana reform bill passed under Democratic control would just end up tossed off the books once Republicans take back the power.\n\n> “*When Republicans next control the government, we’d be able to repeal every bill that had just been rammed through. But a few years later, Democrats would try to flip it all back. So instead of building stable consensus, we’d be chaotically swapping party platforms*.” – Sen. Mitch McConnell\n\nFrom this point of view, it wouldn’t be the smartest idea to kill the filibuster as it would possibly take away the possibilities of legalizing cannabis on a federal level in an effective -and durable- way.\n\nIt could take away the possibilities of passing any kind of reform the Biden administration would want to pass.\n\nAnd with the landscape being the way it is, It seems like federal legalization won’t be occurring any time soon.\n\nFor a quick assessment of your needs – let’s talk to discuss how Trusts can help your business.\n\nWhether this is your first land use issue or most recent, our office has helped people and businesses alike.\n\nThomas Howard was on the ball and got things done. Easy to work with, communicates very well, and I would recommend him anytime.","meta_canonical":null}

3. Robots.txt Check

Query:

Response:

4. Spam/Ban Check

Query:

Response:

5. Seen Status Check

ℹ️ Skipped - page is already crawled

📄

INDEXABLE

✅

CRAWLED

2 days ago

🤖

ROBOTS ALLOWED

Page Info Filters

Filter	Status	Condition	Details
HTTP status	PASS	`download_http_code = 200`	HTTP 200
Age cutoff	PASS	`download_stamp > now() - 6 MONTH`	0.1 months ago
History drop	PASS	`isNull(history_drop_reason)`	No drop reason
Spam/ban	PASS	`fh_dont_index != 1 AND ml_spam_score = 0`	ml_spam_score=0
Canonical	PASS	`meta_canonical IS NULL OR = '' OR = src_unparsed`	Not set

Page Details

Property	Value
URL	https://collateralbase.com/filibuster-and-federal-marijuana-legalization/
Last Crawled	2026-04-09 22:48:23 (2 days ago)
First Indexed	2022-07-07 00:44:24 (3 years ago)
HTTP Status Code	200
Meta Title	Filibuster and Federal Marijuana Legalization: Why it won't happen in 2021
Meta Description	Filibuster is a tactic employed in the U.S. Senate to prevent a measure from being brought to a vote, but how does this affect federal marijuana legalization?
Meta Canonical	null
Boilerpipe Text	Filibuster and federal marijuana legalization Last years have been very important for cannabis legalization. Currently, fifteen states , two territories and the District of Columbia have legalized cannabis for adult recreational use. New York is the most recent state to legalize cannabis, which was passed in late March 2021, during New York’s 2021 session. And the road ahead seems promising for states Cannabis legalization, with states like Virginia or New Mexico that have proposed the implementation of recreational marijuana legalization bills that would establish a regulated commercial market. More and more states are taking the initiative to decriminalize or directly legalize recreational marijuana. However -on the other hand- federal legalization doesn’t look so favorable. Recently, Michigan urged Congress of the United States to clarify its position on the legality of marijuana under the Federal Controlled Substances Act. Under federal law -unfortunately- marijuana is still a Schedule I illegal substance. And considering that there’s a 50-50 split in the 117 th U.S. Congress, federal legalization probably won’t be happening anytime soon, as the Republicans would be able to repeal it by filibustering. What’s a Filibuster? A Filibuster, according to the United States Senate’s glossary , is an “informal term for any attempt to block or delay Senate action on a bill or other matter by debating it at length, by offering numerous procedural motions, or by any other delating or obstructive actions”. The most common form of filibuster occurs when one or more senators attempt to delay or block a vote on a bill by extending debate on the measure. The Senate rules permit a senator, or a series of senators, to speak for as long as they wish, and on any topic they choose, unless “three-fifths of the Senators duly chosen and sworn” (currently 60 out of 100) vote to bring the debate to a close by invoking cloture -AKA: a motion to end a debate- under Senate Rule XXII. However, today -even though the filibuster is more common than ever- it is not necessary for a senator to talk for hours to maintain a filibuster. Nowadays, all it takes to perform a filibuster is for a senator to state his intention to launch a filibuster against a bill or motion. Immediately after the senator’s intention is stated, a vote has to be taken, and only after getting at least 60 votes any action could be taken on the matter, getting less than 60 votes would mean the bill or motion got blocked. It can be described -basically- as a move in which senators demand a supermajority to cut off debate and move to an actual vote. For a quick assessment of your needs – let’s talk to discuss how Trusts can help your business. History of the Filibuster Being able to block a measure through extended debate was generated as a side effect of an 1806 rule change. This tactic was infrequently used during much of the 19th and 20th centuries. In 1970, the Senate adopted a “two-track” procedure to prevent filibusters from stopping all other Senate business and thus . The minority then felt politically safer in threatening filibusters more regularly, which became normalized over time to the point that 60 votes are now required to end debate on nearly every controversial legislative item. Laws that expressly restrict the time for Senate discussion, such as the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 -which established the budget reconciliation mechanism- have been used to limit the procedure. Changes in 2013 and 2017 now require only a simple majority to invoke cloture on nominations, although most legislation still requires 60 votes. Although one or more senators can still hold the floor for a prolonged period of time on occasion, often without the Senate leadership’s knowledge. However, since the Senate’s ability to act eventually depends on whether there are enough votes to invoke cloture and proceed to a final vote on passage, these “filibusters” generally only cause small delays and have little influence on the outcome. Filibustering was actually created by accident in 1806. In 1789, the first U.S. Senate adopted rules allowing senators to move the previous question by simple majority vote, which meant ending the debate and proceeding to vote. At that time, Vice President Aaron Burr argued that the previous-question motion was redundant, had only been exercised once in the preceding four years and, therefore, it should be eliminated, which was done in 1806. These changes on the Senate’s rules made filibustering possible, as it didn’t create another alternative to terminate the debate. The senate allowed the tactic to be used until more than a century later, in 1917, when -during World War I- a rule allowing cloture of a debate was adopted by the Senate after the urging of President Woodrow Wilson, after a group of 12 anti-war senators managed to kill a bill that would have allowed Wilson to arm merchant vessels in the face of unrestricted German submarine warfare. From 1917 to 1949, the requirements for cloture were two-thirds of the senators voting. During this period of time, there were times where politicians recited Shakespeare and read out recipes for hours at a time, some of them occupying as long as 15 hours of debate. In 1949 the Senate made invoking cloture even more difficult by requiring two-thirds of the entire Senate membership to vote in favor of a cloture motion. Then, ten years later, in 1959 -anticipating more civil rights legislation- the Senate restored the cloture threshold to two-thirds of those voting. In 1970 the Senate introduced a “two-track system”, which would allow the majority leader -with unanimous consent or the agreement of the minority leader- to have more than one main motion pending on the floor as unfinished business. Under this system, the Senate can have two or more pieces of legislation or nominations pending on the floor simultaneously by designating specific periods during the day when each one will be considered. Filibusters became easier for the minority to retain as a result of this change. This also led to the modern era in which an effective supermajority requirement exists to pass legislation, with no practical requirement that the minority party actually hold the floor or extend debate . In 1975, the Senate revised its cloture rule so that three-fifths of sworn senators (60 votes out of 100) could limit debate, except for changing Senate rules which still requires a two-thirds majority of those present and voting to invoke cloture. However, by returning to an absolute number of all Senators (60) rather than a proportion of those present and voting, the change also made any filibusters easier to sustain on the floor by a small number of senators from the minority party without requiring the presence of their minority colleagues. This further reduced the majority’s leverage to force an issue through extended debate. Exceptions for the Filibuster There are some bills that are not subject to the effective 60-vote requirements. These are bills that -under provisions of law- have a limited time for debating them. These limits on debate allow the Senate to hold a simple-majority vote on final passage without obtaining the 60 votes normally needed to close debate: Budget reconciliation . Expedites the passage of certain budgetary legislation. Trade promotion authority . Gives authority to the President to negotiate international trade agreements in a “fast track” Congressional review act . Allows Congress to review and repeal administrative regulations adopted by the Executive Branch within 60 legislative days. National emergencies act . Formalizes the emergency powers of the President. War powers resolution . Generally, requires the President to withdraw troops committed overseas within 60 days, which the President may extend once for 30 additional days. How to end a Filibuster As of today, according to the rules set for debate in the United States Senate, 60 votes are needed to end a filibuster . Once the debate is closed, senators can move forward with consideration of the measure, amendments or final votes. The issue is that, nowadays, with the Congress split in half, this isn’t possible, as the Republicans are unlikely to vote against the filibuster. And what’s even more, Democrats would have to tread lightly this session, to ensure they don’t upset the Republicans, as doing so could cost any chance at passing even the smallest reform. How could the Democrats kill the filibuster and what’s the “Nuclear Option”? Another option that the Democrats have in order to pass federal legalization would be the so-called “nuclear option”. The “nuclear option” is a parliamentary procedure that allows the Senate to override a standing rule of the Senate, such as the three-fifths vote rule to close debate, by a simple majority. The option is invoked when the majority leader raises a point of order that contravenes a standing rule. The term “nuclear option” is an analogy to nuclear weapons being the most extreme option. The “nuclear option” would allow the Senate to override one of its standing rules, including the 60-vote rule to close debate , by a simple majority (51+ votes or 50 votes with the Vice President casting the tie-breaking vote), rather than the two-thirds supermajority normally required to amend the rules. To this day, the “nuclear option” has never been used to kill the filibuster. In this sense, it would be possible for the Democrats to change the rules for the filibuster. However, Senate minority leader, Mitch McConnell doesn’t want the filibuster to die, and has decided to not negotiate with Democrats until they agree to keep it in play. In the current state of the Senate, where there’s a 50/50 division, it would be fairly complicated to change these rules, as the Senate would need -at least- 51 votes, which means that every single Democrat would need to be on board to change the rules, which can be a bit tricky, as there are some of them who have -openly- been in favor of filibuster in the past. What’s even more, let’s say that the Democrats find a way to eradicate the filibuster and start passing bills on marijuana legalization. According to Sen. McConnell, this could lead to a situation where any marijuana reform bill passed under Democratic control would just end up tossed off the books once Republicans take back the power. “ When Republicans next control the government, we’d be able to repeal every bill that had just been rammed through. But a few years later, Democrats would try to flip it all back. So instead of building stable consensus, we’d be chaotically swapping party platforms .” – Sen. Mitch McConnell From this point of view, it wouldn’t be the smartest idea to kill the filibuster as it would possibly take away the possibilities of legalizing cannabis on a federal level in an effective -and durable- way. It could take away the possibilities of passing any kind of reform the Biden administration would want to pass. And with the landscape being the way it is, It seems like federal legalization won’t be occurring any time soon. For a quick assessment of your needs – let’s talk to discuss how Trusts can help your business. Whether this is your first land use issue or most recent, our office has helped people and businesses alike. Thomas Howard was on the ball and got things done. Easy to work with, communicates very well, and I would recommend him anytime.
Markdown	![](https://px.ads.linkedin.com/collect/?pid=4052524&fmt=gif) [Skip to content](https://collateralbase.com/filibuster-and-federal-marijuana-legalization/#content) [![](https://storage.googleapis.com/msgsndr/sW7jiEzOSaEnERWigeMa/media/66428808863715ecd1b167e0.png)](https://collateralbase.com/) - [Business Consulting](https://collateralbase.com/business-consulting/) - [Expert Consultation — \$200](https://collateralbase.com/consultation/) - [Cannabis Consultants](https://collateralbase.com/cannabis-consultants/) - [Social Equity](https://collateralbase.com/social-equity/) - [How to Sell Your Cannabis License](https://collateralbase.com/how-to-sell-your-cannabis-license-important-considerations/) - [About Us](https://collateralbase.com/about-us/) - [Sergio Barraza-Ingstrom](https://collateralbase.com/sergio-barraza-ingstrom/) - [Adam Dalton](https://collateralbase.com/adam-dalton/) - [Thomas Howard](https://collateralbase.com/thomas-howard/) - [Business Consulting](https://collateralbase.com/business-consulting/) - [Expert Consultation — \$200](https://collateralbase.com/consultation/) - [Cannabis Consultants](https://collateralbase.com/cannabis-consultants/) - [Social Equity](https://collateralbase.com/social-equity/) - [How to Sell Your Cannabis License](https://collateralbase.com/how-to-sell-your-cannabis-license-important-considerations/) - [About Us](https://collateralbase.com/about-us/) - [Sergio Barraza-Ingstrom](https://collateralbase.com/sergio-barraza-ingstrom/) - [Adam Dalton](https://collateralbase.com/adam-dalton/) - [Thomas Howard](https://collateralbase.com/thomas-howard/) [Get Help Now](https://collateralbase.com/consultation/) [![](https://collateralbase.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Collateral-Base-Logo-Design-March2024-1-e1711657050922-1.webp)](https://collateralbase.com/) - [Business Consulting](https://collateralbase.com/business-consulting/) - [Expert Consultation — \$200](https://collateralbase.com/consultation/) - [Cannabis Consultants](https://collateralbase.com/cannabis-consultants/) - [Social Equity](https://collateralbase.com/social-equity/) - [How to Sell Your Cannabis License](https://collateralbase.com/how-to-sell-your-cannabis-license-important-considerations/) - [About Us](https://collateralbase.com/about-us/) - [Sergio Barraza-Ingstrom](https://collateralbase.com/sergio-barraza-ingstrom/) - [Adam Dalton](https://collateralbase.com/adam-dalton/) - [Thomas Howard](https://collateralbase.com/thomas-howard/) - [Business Consulting](https://collateralbase.com/business-consulting/) - [Expert Consultation — \$200](https://collateralbase.com/consultation/) - [Cannabis Consultants](https://collateralbase.com/cannabis-consultants/) - [Social Equity](https://collateralbase.com/social-equity/) - [How to Sell Your Cannabis License](https://collateralbase.com/how-to-sell-your-cannabis-license-important-considerations/) - [About Us](https://collateralbase.com/about-us/) - [Sergio Barraza-Ingstrom](https://collateralbase.com/sergio-barraza-ingstrom/) - [Adam Dalton](https://collateralbase.com/adam-dalton/) - [Thomas Howard](https://collateralbase.com/thomas-howard/) [Get in Touch](https://collateralbase.com/consultation/) # Filibuster and Federal Marijuana Legalization ![Filibuster and Federal Marijuana Legalization](https://collateralbase.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Filibuster-and-Federal-Marijuana-Legalization-1024x683.webp) ## Filibuster and federal marijuana legalization Last years have been very important for cannabis legalization. Currently, [fifteen states](https://www.cannabisindustrylawyer.com/map-of-marijuana-legality-by-state/), two territories and the District of Columbia have legalized cannabis for adult recreational use. [New York](https://www.cannabisindustrylawyer.com/new-york-cannabis-license-application/) is the most recent state to legalize cannabis, which was passed in late March 2021, during New York’s 2021 session. And the road ahead seems promising for states Cannabis legalization, with states like [Virginia](https://cannabisindustrylawyer.com/how-to-open-a-dispensary-in-virginia/) or [New Mexico](https://www.cannabisindustrylawyer.com/new-mexico-cannabis-license/) that have proposed the implementation of recreational marijuana legalization bills that would establish a regulated commercial market. More and more states are taking the initiative to decriminalize or directly legalize recreational marijuana. However -on the other hand- federal legalization doesn’t look so favorable. Recently, Michigan urged Congress of the United States to clarify its position on the legality of marijuana under the Federal Controlled Substances Act. Under federal law -unfortunately- marijuana is still a Schedule I illegal substance. And considering that there’s a 50-50 split in the 117th U.S. Congress, federal legalization probably won’t be happening anytime soon, as the Republicans would be able to repeal it by filibustering. ## What’s a Filibuster? A Filibuster, according to the [United States Senate’s glossary](https://www.senate.gov/reference/glossary_term/filibuster.htm), is an “informal term for any attempt to block or delay Senate action on a bill or other matter by debating it at length, by offering numerous procedural motions, or by any other delating or obstructive actions”. The most common form of filibuster occurs when one or more senators attempt to delay or block a vote on a bill by extending debate on the measure. The Senate rules permit a senator, or a series of senators, to speak for as long as they wish, and on any topic they choose, unless “three-fifths of the Senators duly chosen and sworn” (currently 60 out of 100) vote to bring the debate to a close by invoking cloture -AKA: a motion to end a debate- under Senate Rule XXII. However, today -even though the filibuster is more common than ever- it is not necessary for a senator to talk for hours to maintain a filibuster. Nowadays, all it takes to perform a filibuster is for a senator to state his intention to launch a filibuster against a bill or motion. Immediately after the senator’s intention is stated, a vote has to be taken, and only after getting at least 60 votes any action could be taken on the matter, getting less than 60 votes would mean the bill or motion got blocked. It can be described -basically- as a move in which senators demand a supermajority to cut off debate and move to an actual vote. For a quick assessment of your needs – let’s talk to discuss how Trusts can help your business. ## History of the Filibuster Being able to block a measure through extended debate was generated as a side effect of an 1806 rule change. This tactic was infrequently used during much of the 19th and 20th centuries. In 1970, the Senate adopted a “two-track” procedure to prevent filibusters from stopping all other Senate business and thus . The minority then felt politically safer in threatening filibusters more regularly, which became normalized over time to the point that 60 votes are now required to end debate on nearly every controversial legislative item. Laws that expressly restrict the time for Senate discussion, such as the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 -which established the budget reconciliation mechanism- have been used to limit the procedure. Changes in 2013 and 2017 now require only a simple majority to invoke cloture on nominations, although most legislation still requires 60 votes. Although one or more senators can still hold the floor for a prolonged period of time on occasion, often without the Senate leadership’s knowledge. However, since the Senate’s ability to act eventually depends on whether there are enough votes to invoke cloture and proceed to a final vote on passage, these “filibusters” generally only cause small delays and have little influence on the outcome. Filibustering was actually created by accident in 1806. In 1789, the first U.S. Senate adopted rules allowing senators to move the previous question by simple majority vote, which meant ending the debate and proceeding to vote. At that time, Vice President Aaron Burr argued that the previous-question motion was redundant, had only been exercised once in the preceding four years and, therefore, it should be eliminated, which was done in 1806. These changes on the Senate’s rules made filibustering possible, as it didn’t create another alternative to terminate the debate. The senate allowed the tactic to be used until more than a century later, in 1917, when -during World War I- a rule allowing cloture of a debate was adopted by the Senate after the urging of President Woodrow Wilson, after a group of 12 anti-war senators managed to kill a bill that would have allowed Wilson to arm merchant vessels in the face of unrestricted German submarine warfare. From 1917 to 1949, the requirements for cloture were two-thirds of the senators voting. During this period of time, there were times where politicians recited Shakespeare and read out recipes for hours at a time, some of them occupying as long as 15 hours of debate. In 1949 the Senate made invoking cloture even more difficult by requiring two-thirds of the entire Senate membership to vote in favor of a cloture motion. Then, ten years later, in 1959 -anticipating more civil rights legislation- the Senate restored the cloture threshold to two-thirds of those voting. In 1970 the Senate introduced a “two-track system”, which would allow the majority leader -with unanimous consent or the agreement of the minority leader- to have more than one main motion pending on the floor as unfinished business. Under this system, the Senate can have two or more pieces of legislation or nominations pending on the floor simultaneously by designating specific periods during the day when each one will be considered. Filibusters became easier for the minority to retain as a result of this change. This also led to the modern era in which an effective supermajority requirement exists to pass legislation, with no practical requirement that the minority party actually hold the floor or extend debate. In 1975, the Senate revised its cloture rule so that three-fifths of sworn senators (60 votes out of 100) could limit debate, except for changing Senate rules which still requires a two-thirds majority of those present and voting to invoke cloture. However, by returning to an absolute number of all Senators (60) rather than a proportion of those present and voting, the change also made any filibusters easier to sustain on the floor by a small number of senators from the minority party without requiring the presence of their minority colleagues. This further reduced the majority’s leverage to force an issue through extended debate. ### Exceptions for the Filibuster There are some bills that are not subject to the effective 60-vote requirements. These are bills that -under provisions of law- have a limited time for debating them. These limits on debate allow the Senate to hold a simple-majority vote on final passage without obtaining the 60 votes normally needed to close debate: - Budget reconciliation. Expedites the passage of certain budgetary legislation. - Trade promotion authority. Gives authority to the President to negotiate international trade agreements in a “fast track” - Congressional review act. Allows Congress to review and repeal administrative regulations adopted by the Executive Branch within 60 legislative days. - National emergencies act. Formalizes the emergency powers of the President. - War powers resolution. Generally, requires the President to withdraw troops committed overseas within 60 days, which the President may extend once for 30 additional days. ### How to end a Filibuster As of today, according to the rules set for debate in the United States Senate, 60 votes are needed to end a filibuster. Once the debate is closed, senators can move forward with consideration of the measure, amendments or final votes. The issue is that, nowadays, with the Congress split in half, this isn’t possible, as the Republicans are unlikely to vote against the filibuster. And what’s even more, Democrats would have to tread lightly this session, to ensure they don’t upset the Republicans, as doing so could cost any chance at passing even the smallest reform. ## How could the Democrats kill the filibuster and what’s the “Nuclear Option”? Another option that the Democrats have in order to pass federal legalization would be the so-called “nuclear option”. The “nuclear option” is a parliamentary procedure that allows the Senate to override a standing rule of the Senate, such as the three-fifths vote rule to close debate, by a simple majority. The option is invoked when the majority leader raises a point of order that contravenes a standing rule. The term “nuclear option” is an analogy to nuclear weapons being the most extreme option. The “nuclear option” would allow the Senate to override one of its standing rules, including the 60-vote rule to close debate, by a simple majority (51+ votes or 50 votes with the Vice President casting the tie-breaking vote), rather than the two-thirds supermajority normally required to amend the rules. To this day, the “nuclear option” has never been used to kill the filibuster. In this sense, it would be possible for the Democrats to change the rules for the filibuster. However, Senate minority leader, Mitch McConnell doesn’t want the filibuster to die, and has decided to not negotiate with Democrats until they agree to keep it in play. In the current state of the Senate, where there’s a 50/50 division, it would be fairly complicated to change these rules, as the Senate would need -at least- 51 votes, which means that every single Democrat would need to be on board to change the rules, which can be a bit tricky, as there are some of them who have -openly- been in favor of filibuster in the past. What’s even more, let’s say that the Democrats find a way to eradicate the filibuster and start passing bills on marijuana legalization. According to Sen. McConnell, this could lead to a situation where any marijuana reform bill passed under Democratic control would just end up tossed off the books once Republicans take back the power. > “When Republicans next control the government, we’d be able to repeal every bill that had just been rammed through. But a few years later, Democrats would try to flip it all back. So instead of building stable consensus, we’d be chaotically swapping party platforms.” – Sen. Mitch McConnell From this point of view, it wouldn’t be the smartest idea to kill the filibuster as it would possibly take away the possibilities of legalizing cannabis on a federal level in an effective -and durable- way. It could take away the possibilities of passing any kind of reform the Biden administration would want to pass. And with the landscape being the way it is, It seems like federal legalization won’t be occurring any time soon. For a quick assessment of your needs – let’s talk to discuss how Trusts can help your business. Whether this is your first land use issue or most recent, our office has helped people and businesses alike. Thomas Howard was on the ball and got things done. Easy to work with, communicates very well, and I would recommend him anytime. [![Picture of Diego](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/62cec947e5272be1bf8b3c81291a9c01617faddc3bc44f4fc5357e3467ad7908?s=300&d=mm&r=g)](https://collateralbase.com/author/diego/) [Diego](https://collateralbase.com/author/diego/) ## Can We Help Your Business? Get in touch with us about what you are looking for and we’ll let you know if we can help and how much we think it will cost. [Lets talk](https://collateralbase.com/filibuster-and-federal-marijuana-legalization/#elementor-action%3Aaction%3Dpopup%3Aopen%26settings%3DeyJpZCI6IjIyNzUxNyIsInRvZ2dsZSI6ZmFsc2V9) #### Table of Contents ##### Recent Posts - [Virginia Cannabis Dispensary License 2026: Application Requirements & Scoring Guide](https://collateralbase.com/virginia-cannabis-dispensary-license-2026-application-requirements-scoring-guide/) - [What a Cannabis License Consultant Actually Does (And Why It Matters)](https://collateralbase.com/cannabis-license-consultant/) - [APA vs. MIPA in Cannabis: Which Deal Structure Wins?](https://collateralbase.com/apa-vs-mipa-cannabis/) - [Cannabis Business Valuation: What Buyers and Sellers Need to Know](https://collateralbase.com/cannabis-business-valuation/) - [Virginia Cannabis Processing License 2026: Requirements, Costs, and Application Readiness](https://collateralbase.com/virginia-cannabis-processing-license-2026/) - [Virginia Cannabis Cultivation License 2026: Requirements, Costs & Readiness Plan](https://collateralbase.com/virginia-cannabis-cultivation-license-2026/) - [Virginia Cannabis Microbusiness License 2026: Requirements + Readiness Plan](https://collateralbase.com/virginia-cannabis-microbusiness-license-2026/) - [Virginia Dispensary Financial Model (2026): Complete Pro Forma + Runway Plan](https://collateralbase.com/virginia-dispensary-financial-model-2026/) - [Virginia Dispensary Pro Forma & Runway Model (2026): Budget Ranges, Burn Rate, and the ‘Lean → Loud’ Launch Plan](https://collateralbase.com/virginia-cannabis-dispensary-license-2026-application/) - [Virginia cannabis dispensary license 2026 site + locality strategy](https://collateralbase.com/virginia-dispensary-site-selection-2026/) ## Related Posts ### [Virginia Cannabis Dispensary License 2026: Application Requirements & Scoring Guide](https://collateralbase.com/virginia-cannabis-dispensary-license-2026-application-requirements-scoring-guide/) Introduction: Why Virginia’s 2026 Retail Round Matters Updated March 2026: SB 542/HB 642 passed the Virginia General Assembly on March 14, 2026. Applications open by [Read More »](https://collateralbase.com/virginia-cannabis-dispensary-license-2026-application-requirements-scoring-guide/) [![cannabis license consultant](https://collateralbase.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/cannabis-license-consultant-300x200.webp)](https://collateralbase.com/cannabis-license-consultant/) ![Thomas Howard](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/c8b35e16c96069ead3e06a606444296b8058f7c0f542d86e4e21603b44848410?s=128&d=mm&r=g) ### [What a Cannabis License Consultant Actually Does (And Why It Matters)](https://collateralbase.com/cannabis-license-consultant/) Most cannabis license applications are not rejected because the applicant lacked capital or commitment. They are rejected because a security plan was missing a required [Read More »](https://collateralbase.com/cannabis-license-consultant/) [![apa vs mipa](https://collateralbase.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/apa-vs-mipa-cannabis-300x200.webp)](https://collateralbase.com/apa-vs-mipa-cannabis/) ![Thomas Howard](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/c8b35e16c96069ead3e06a606444296b8058f7c0f542d86e4e21603b44848410?s=128&d=mm&r=g) ### [APA vs. MIPA in Cannabis: Which Deal Structure Wins?](https://collateralbase.com/apa-vs-mipa-cannabis/) Every cannabis acquisition comes down to a fundamental structural choice: buy the assets, or buy the entity. An Asset Purchase Agreement (APA) transfers specified assets [Read More »](https://collateralbase.com/apa-vs-mipa-cannabis/) Copyright 2023 © \\| All rights Reserved - [PRIVACY POLICY](https://collateralbase.com/privacy-policy/) - [TERMS OF USE](https://collateralbase.com/terms-of-use/) - [SITE MAP](https://collateralbase.com/site-maps/) - [DISCLAIMER](https://collateralbase.com/disclaimer/) Developed By [WorldWin Coder Pvt Ltd](https://worldwincoder.com/) & [Stumari](https://www.stumari.co/) [![](https://collateralbase.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Mask-group.webp)](https://collateralbase.com/) Elevating your business strategies with expert guidance and tailored solutions. ## Quick Links - [Business Consulting](https://collateralbase.com/business-consulting/) - [Expert Consultation — \$200](https://collateralbase.com/consultation/) - [Cannabis Consultants](https://collateralbase.com/cannabis-consultants/) - [Social Equity](https://collateralbase.com/social-equity/) - [How to Sell Your Cannabis License](https://collateralbase.com/how-to-sell-your-cannabis-license-important-considerations/) - [About Us](https://collateralbase.com/about-us/) - [Sergio Barraza-Ingstrom](https://collateralbase.com/sergio-barraza-ingstrom/) - [Adam Dalton](https://collateralbase.com/adam-dalton/) - [Thomas Howard](https://collateralbase.com/thomas-howard/) - [Business Consulting](https://collateralbase.com/business-consulting/) - [Expert Consultation — \$200](https://collateralbase.com/consultation/) - [Cannabis Consultants](https://collateralbase.com/cannabis-consultants/) - [Social Equity](https://collateralbase.com/social-equity/) - [How to Sell Your Cannabis License](https://collateralbase.com/how-to-sell-your-cannabis-license-important-considerations/) - [About Us](https://collateralbase.com/about-us/) - [Sergio Barraza-Ingstrom](https://collateralbase.com/sergio-barraza-ingstrom/) - [Adam Dalton](https://collateralbase.com/adam-dalton/) - [Thomas Howard](https://collateralbase.com/thomas-howard/) - [About](https://collateralbdev.wpenginepowered.com/about-us/) - [Business Consulting](https://collateralbdev.wpenginepowered.com/business-consulting/) - [Licensing Consulting](https://collateralbase.com/filibuster-and-federal-marijuana-legalization/) - [Social Equity](https://collateralbase.com/filibuster-and-federal-marijuana-legalization/) - [Dispute Resolution](https://collateralbase.com/filibuster-and-federal-marijuana-legalization/) ## Get In Touch - [\[email protected\]](https://collateralbase.com/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c4b0aba984a7aba8a8a5b0a1b6a5a8a6a5b7a1eaa7aba9) - [456 Fulton St. Ste. 404 Peoria, IL 61602 USA](https://maps.app.goo.gl/UDCsVe6ogzAy1ZQU6) - [\+1 866-485-4880](tel:833-952-3111) ## Social Media [Facebook](https://www.facebook.com/collateralbase/) [Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/collateralbase/) [Youtube](https://www.youtube.com/@CannabisLegalizationNews) [Linkedin]() © Copyright 2025 \\| CollateralBase Developed By [WorldWin Coder Pvt Ltd](https://worldwincoder.com/) & [Stumari](https://www.stumari.co/) - [Terms of Use](https://collateralbase.com/terms-of-use/) - [Disclaimer](https://collateralbase.com/disclaimer/) - [Privacy Policy](https://collateralbase.com/privacy-policy/) ![Collateral Base \\| Cannabis Consultants](https://collateralbase.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/cropped-CBBlueYellow-1-1-150x150.webp) ## Talk to a Cannabis Business Expert 30 minutes. \$200 (credited toward your engagement). One call can change your trajectory. [Book My Expert Consultation →](https://collateralbase.com/consultation/#form) No long forms. Just pick a time that works.
Readable Markdown	![Filibuster and Federal Marijuana Legalization](https://collateralbase.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Filibuster-and-Federal-Marijuana-Legalization-1024x683.webp) ## Filibuster and federal marijuana legalization Last years have been very important for cannabis legalization. Currently, [fifteen states](https://www.cannabisindustrylawyer.com/map-of-marijuana-legality-by-state/), two territories and the District of Columbia have legalized cannabis for adult recreational use. [New York](https://www.cannabisindustrylawyer.com/new-york-cannabis-license-application/) is the most recent state to legalize cannabis, which was passed in late March 2021, during New York’s 2021 session. And the road ahead seems promising for states Cannabis legalization, with states like [Virginia](https://cannabisindustrylawyer.com/how-to-open-a-dispensary-in-virginia/) or [New Mexico](https://www.cannabisindustrylawyer.com/new-mexico-cannabis-license/) that have proposed the implementation of recreational marijuana legalization bills that would establish a regulated commercial market. More and more states are taking the initiative to decriminalize or directly legalize recreational marijuana. However -on the other hand- federal legalization doesn’t look so favorable. Recently, Michigan urged Congress of the United States to clarify its position on the legality of marijuana under the Federal Controlled Substances Act. Under federal law -unfortunately- marijuana is still a Schedule I illegal substance. And considering that there’s a 50-50 split in the 117th U.S. Congress, federal legalization probably won’t be happening anytime soon, as the Republicans would be able to repeal it by filibustering. ## What’s a Filibuster? A Filibuster, according to the [United States Senate’s glossary](https://www.senate.gov/reference/glossary_term/filibuster.htm), is an “informal term for any attempt to block or delay Senate action on a bill or other matter by debating it at length, by offering numerous procedural motions, or by any other delating or obstructive actions”. The most common form of filibuster occurs when one or more senators attempt to delay or block a vote on a bill by extending debate on the measure. The Senate rules permit a senator, or a series of senators, to speak for as long as they wish, and on any topic they choose, unless “three-fifths of the Senators duly chosen and sworn” (currently 60 out of 100) vote to bring the debate to a close by invoking cloture -AKA: a motion to end a debate- under Senate Rule XXII. However, today -even though the filibuster is more common than ever- it is not necessary for a senator to talk for hours to maintain a filibuster. Nowadays, all it takes to perform a filibuster is for a senator to state his intention to launch a filibuster against a bill or motion. Immediately after the senator’s intention is stated, a vote has to be taken, and only after getting at least 60 votes any action could be taken on the matter, getting less than 60 votes would mean the bill or motion got blocked. It can be described -basically- as a move in which senators demand a supermajority to cut off debate and move to an actual vote. For a quick assessment of your needs – let’s talk to discuss how Trusts can help your business. ## History of the Filibuster Being able to block a measure through extended debate was generated as a side effect of an 1806 rule change. This tactic was infrequently used during much of the 19th and 20th centuries. In 1970, the Senate adopted a “two-track” procedure to prevent filibusters from stopping all other Senate business and thus . The minority then felt politically safer in threatening filibusters more regularly, which became normalized over time to the point that 60 votes are now required to end debate on nearly every controversial legislative item. Laws that expressly restrict the time for Senate discussion, such as the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 -which established the budget reconciliation mechanism- have been used to limit the procedure. Changes in 2013 and 2017 now require only a simple majority to invoke cloture on nominations, although most legislation still requires 60 votes. Although one or more senators can still hold the floor for a prolonged period of time on occasion, often without the Senate leadership’s knowledge. However, since the Senate’s ability to act eventually depends on whether there are enough votes to invoke cloture and proceed to a final vote on passage, these “filibusters” generally only cause small delays and have little influence on the outcome. Filibustering was actually created by accident in 1806. In 1789, the first U.S. Senate adopted rules allowing senators to move the previous question by simple majority vote, which meant ending the debate and proceeding to vote. At that time, Vice President Aaron Burr argued that the previous-question motion was redundant, had only been exercised once in the preceding four years and, therefore, it should be eliminated, which was done in 1806. These changes on the Senate’s rules made filibustering possible, as it didn’t create another alternative to terminate the debate. The senate allowed the tactic to be used until more than a century later, in 1917, when -during World War I- a rule allowing cloture of a debate was adopted by the Senate after the urging of President Woodrow Wilson, after a group of 12 anti-war senators managed to kill a bill that would have allowed Wilson to arm merchant vessels in the face of unrestricted German submarine warfare. From 1917 to 1949, the requirements for cloture were two-thirds of the senators voting. During this period of time, there were times where politicians recited Shakespeare and read out recipes for hours at a time, some of them occupying as long as 15 hours of debate. In 1949 the Senate made invoking cloture even more difficult by requiring two-thirds of the entire Senate membership to vote in favor of a cloture motion. Then, ten years later, in 1959 -anticipating more civil rights legislation- the Senate restored the cloture threshold to two-thirds of those voting. In 1970 the Senate introduced a “two-track system”, which would allow the majority leader -with unanimous consent or the agreement of the minority leader- to have more than one main motion pending on the floor as unfinished business. Under this system, the Senate can have two or more pieces of legislation or nominations pending on the floor simultaneously by designating specific periods during the day when each one will be considered. Filibusters became easier for the minority to retain as a result of this change. This also led to the modern era in which an effective supermajority requirement exists to pass legislation, with no practical requirement that the minority party actually hold the floor or extend debate. In 1975, the Senate revised its cloture rule so that three-fifths of sworn senators (60 votes out of 100) could limit debate, except for changing Senate rules which still requires a two-thirds majority of those present and voting to invoke cloture. However, by returning to an absolute number of all Senators (60) rather than a proportion of those present and voting, the change also made any filibusters easier to sustain on the floor by a small number of senators from the minority party without requiring the presence of their minority colleagues. This further reduced the majority’s leverage to force an issue through extended debate. ### Exceptions for the Filibuster There are some bills that are not subject to the effective 60-vote requirements. These are bills that -under provisions of law- have a limited time for debating them. These limits on debate allow the Senate to hold a simple-majority vote on final passage without obtaining the 60 votes normally needed to close debate: - Budget reconciliation. Expedites the passage of certain budgetary legislation. - Trade promotion authority. Gives authority to the President to negotiate international trade agreements in a “fast track” - Congressional review act. Allows Congress to review and repeal administrative regulations adopted by the Executive Branch within 60 legislative days. - National emergencies act. Formalizes the emergency powers of the President. - War powers resolution. Generally, requires the President to withdraw troops committed overseas within 60 days, which the President may extend once for 30 additional days. ### How to end a Filibuster As of today, according to the rules set for debate in the United States Senate, 60 votes are needed to end a filibuster. Once the debate is closed, senators can move forward with consideration of the measure, amendments or final votes. The issue is that, nowadays, with the Congress split in half, this isn’t possible, as the Republicans are unlikely to vote against the filibuster. And what’s even more, Democrats would have to tread lightly this session, to ensure they don’t upset the Republicans, as doing so could cost any chance at passing even the smallest reform. ## How could the Democrats kill the filibuster and what’s the “Nuclear Option”? Another option that the Democrats have in order to pass federal legalization would be the so-called “nuclear option”. The “nuclear option” is a parliamentary procedure that allows the Senate to override a standing rule of the Senate, such as the three-fifths vote rule to close debate, by a simple majority. The option is invoked when the majority leader raises a point of order that contravenes a standing rule. The term “nuclear option” is an analogy to nuclear weapons being the most extreme option. The “nuclear option” would allow the Senate to override one of its standing rules, including the 60-vote rule to close debate, by a simple majority (51+ votes or 50 votes with the Vice President casting the tie-breaking vote), rather than the two-thirds supermajority normally required to amend the rules. To this day, the “nuclear option” has never been used to kill the filibuster. In this sense, it would be possible for the Democrats to change the rules for the filibuster. However, Senate minority leader, Mitch McConnell doesn’t want the filibuster to die, and has decided to not negotiate with Democrats until they agree to keep it in play. In the current state of the Senate, where there’s a 50/50 division, it would be fairly complicated to change these rules, as the Senate would need -at least- 51 votes, which means that every single Democrat would need to be on board to change the rules, which can be a bit tricky, as there are some of them who have -openly- been in favor of filibuster in the past. What’s even more, let’s say that the Democrats find a way to eradicate the filibuster and start passing bills on marijuana legalization. According to Sen. McConnell, this could lead to a situation where any marijuana reform bill passed under Democratic control would just end up tossed off the books once Republicans take back the power. > “When Republicans next control the government, we’d be able to repeal every bill that had just been rammed through. But a few years later, Democrats would try to flip it all back. So instead of building stable consensus, we’d be chaotically swapping party platforms.” – Sen. Mitch McConnell From this point of view, it wouldn’t be the smartest idea to kill the filibuster as it would possibly take away the possibilities of legalizing cannabis on a federal level in an effective -and durable- way. It could take away the possibilities of passing any kind of reform the Biden administration would want to pass. And with the landscape being the way it is, It seems like federal legalization won’t be occurring any time soon. For a quick assessment of your needs – let’s talk to discuss how Trusts can help your business. Whether this is your first land use issue or most recent, our office has helped people and businesses alike. Thomas Howard was on the ball and got things done. Easy to work with, communicates very well, and I would recommend him anytime.
Shard	31 (laksa)
Root Hash	13144868163549979031
Unparsed URL	com,collateralbase!/filibuster-and-federal-marijuana-legalization/ s443