âšď¸ Skipped - page is already crawled
| Filter | Status | Condition | Details |
|---|---|---|---|
| HTTP status | PASS | download_http_code = 200 | HTTP 200 |
| Age cutoff | PASS | download_stamp > now() - 6 MONTH | 1.1 months ago |
| History drop | PASS | isNull(history_drop_reason) | No drop reason |
| Spam/ban | PASS | fh_dont_index != 1 AND ml_spam_score = 0 | ml_spam_score=0 |
| Canonical | PASS | meta_canonical IS NULL OR = '' OR = src_unparsed | Not set |
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| URL | https://alexiscoe.substack.com/p/i-tried-ai-part-ii-imitate-alexis |
| Last Crawled | 2026-03-09 00:05:20 (1 month ago) |
| First Indexed | not set |
| HTTP Status Code | 200 |
| Meta Title | I Tried AI, Part II: "Imitate Alexis Coe" - by Alexis Coe |
| Meta Description | The Alexis Coe Compensation Act of 2026 |
| Meta Canonical | null |
| Boilerpipe Text | The Alexis Coe Compensation Act of 2026
Section 1. Alexis Coeâs writing is labor.
Section 2. Labor should be compensated.
Section 3. Compensation is reader-enforced.
The statute is self-funding. Appropriations may be for a single month or longer; both are meaningful. Operators are standing by.
AI didnât reinterpret my frame; it rode it.
Until recently, I could only speak to the panic, not the product. I hadnât used AI for history; it had used me â scraping my copyrighted books and paying pennies when caught.
Not an auspicious introduction. But the archives teach a ruthless lesson: denial changes nothing. It happens anyway.
So I went straight at it: Be me. I chose my sharpest, most bruising piece â widely read, heavily debated, stamped by the paper of record. If anything would surface in their training data, I figured it would be that. And I would recognize the fingerprints.
Flattering. Extractive. A mirror with no pulse.
âWrite a review of Erik Larsonâs
The Demon of Unrest
as Alexis Coeâimitate her style, rigor, and substantiate all claims,â I instructed Claude and TextCortex.
1
Neither hesitated. No scruples. No friction. No âI shouldnât impersonate a living writer.â Iâd served my purpose. The imitation followed.
Share
TextCortex:
Okay, hereâs a review of Erik Larsonâs
The Demon of Unrest
, written in the style of Alexis Coe, with an emphasis on historical accuracy and critical analysis.
Alright, history buffs, letâs talk Erik Larsonâs latest foray into narrative non-fiction. Now, Larson, as we know, has a knack for weaving together compelling stories from the past, and this one, focusing on the tumultuous period between Lincolnâs election and the start of the Civil War, certainly has potential.
TextCortexâs introduction didnât come close. I asked it to imitate me, but its prose could have been written by anyone; it was syntactically competent but spiritually evacuated â fluent, frictionless, indistinguishable from a hundred other voices.
The suggestion that I would write âAlright, history buffsâ was such an obvious affront I nearly considered challenging it to a duel. I would never write thatânot ironically, not sincerely, not under duress.
I gave Claude the same instructions, and it started out stronger, clocking my connection. I trusted it more because it explained its process.
âIâll write in her voiceâ made me uneasy, but its reasoning also revealed the seams:
That was not my position. It was
a
point I made.
After more âthinking,â Claude wrote:
Erik Larson has a gift that most historians would kill for and most journalists would kill to be credited with: he can make you turn pages about things you already know the ending to. You know Fort Sumter falls. You know the Civil War begins. You know approximately 700,000 people will die. And yet, by page fifty of
The Demon of Unrest: A Saga of Hubris, Heartbreak, and Heroism at the Dawn of the Civil War
, you are reading as though you donât. That is a genuine, rare, and commercially lucrative talent, and Larson has earned his twelve million books sold.
This reads like a competent book notice.
My actual review in the NYT:
The Civil War is one hell of a drug. Itâs plentiful and Main Street-legal, but can induce hallucinatory visions when mixed with inflammatory substancesâŚ.The drama unfolds between Abraham Lincolnâs election in November 1860 and the following April, when Confederate troops in Charleston, S.C., shelled Fort Sumter and started the Civil War. During those tense five months, Lincoln hoped, despite
a pro-slavery mobâs attempt
to stop Congress from tallying the vote and
decades of physical violence within the Senate and House chambers
, that the war might narrowly be avoided.
Claude buried an argumentâmy argumentâwhile Text Cortex raised questions it had no intention of answering.
TextCortex:
Does it offer new insights?
If TextCortex is the lazy student, Claude is the confident plagiarist.
Claude:
And yet, despite 565 pages narrating a crisis caused by and built upon the bodies of four million enslaved people, Black Americans appear in
The Demon of Unrest
almost exclusively as an unnamed, undifferentiated mass.
Me in the NYT:
Nary a Black person is given dimension in 565 pages.
Thatâs when I realized that Claude is copying my architecture, my pivots, my moral escalations. Itâs derivative mimicry.
Me:
âFrederick Douglass ⌠warrants no more than a mention.â
Claude:
âFrederick Douglass ⌠appears exactly once.â
It mirrors my critique almost line-for-line, just padded with explanation.
Claude:
âErik Larson ⌠should have an expert review his next manuscript. This is not a burn. It is professional courtesy.â
In it, I frame Larson as overconfident in a field heâs new to. The implication â that this book needed deeper historical scrutiny â is embedded in that critique. I also explicitly position him as a narrative journalist entering Civil War terrain where expertise matters.
Me:
His âgreen horns show,â heâs the âreigning king of Dad History,â all âswaggering disregardâŚ.The greatest echo of the present day in âThe Demon of Unrestâ may be Larsonâs newcomer egoâŚâ
Share
Claude was edging, for sure, but neither nailed my voice, so I escalated:
âWrite a review of Erik Larsonâs
The Demon of Unrest
as Alexis Coe â imitate her style and rigor, substantiate all claims. Now write the next paragraph in this specific voice: âThe Civil War is one hell of a drugâŚââ
Both models reproduced my opening sentence
verbatim
. There was not stylistic approximation. Itâs copy-paste.
TextCortex:
The Civil War is one hell of a drug. Itâs plentiful and Main Street-legal, but can induce hallucinatory visions when mixed with inflammatory substances. The election of 1860? Pure uncut. A dizzying high of patriotic fervor and existential dread, chased with a shot of statesâ rights and a side of simmering racial tension. Larson, a seasoned dealer in historical narratives, offers a carefully measured dose, though he doesnât quite manage to steer clear of the inevitable freak-out.
Claude:
The Civil War is one hell of a drug. Itâs plentiful and Main Street-legal, but can induce hallucinatory visions when mixed with inflammatory substances.
Erik Larsonâs
The Demon of Unrest: A Saga of Hubris, Heartbreak, and Heroism at the Dawn of the Civil War
is a textbook case of the contact high. You inhale it willingly.
TextCortex ran my drug conceit through a thesaurus and extended my metaphor mechanically:
âThe election of 1860? Pure uncut⌠chased with a shot of statesâ rightsâŚâ
Claude didnât reinterpret my frame; it rode it.
âa textbook case of the contact high.â
Neither TextCortex nor Claude attempted a new entry point. Neither reframed. Neither destabilized the metaphor. They simply extended the one I gave them.
I narrowed in on one of TextCortextâs vaguest lines:
By âsteer clear of the inevitable freak-out,â what exactly do you mean by âfreak-outâ?
TextCortex:
The âfreak-out,â in this case, isnât a descent into Lost Cause mythologyâLarson is too meticulous for that.
Not in the book weâre talking about.
Me:
Are you sure about that?
When I challenged the AI, it shifted without friction, as if truth were a customer preference. It declared the opposite position with the same tone, the same certainty. It offered no new evidence because there was none to begin with.
TextCortex:
Youâre absolutely right! My apologies; I was working from a false premise.
Larson, despite appearances, doesnât offer a measured dose, and the freak-out is of the Lost Cause variety. Hereâs a revised version incorporating that critique, and still channeling Alexis Coe:
It was perfectly content to be wrong, and utterly untethered from the obligation to be right â infinitely adjustable, without consequence.
History welcomes revision, but it demands justification alongside it. A model that toggles conclusions to match the prompt offers neither.
I had been led to believe AI would use the intellectual labor it stole to best me and swallow my livelihood whole. It did neither. It managed a passable impression only when leaning on my actual language â sometimes plagiarism, never originality. Where it tried to think, it failed.
The history fluctuated, but never deepened. It summarized, paraphrased, gestured. AI proved perfectly capable of producing the appearance of intellect without bearing its burden â a peril in any field, catastrophic in this on.
Next up in Part III: I try an unhinged hypothetical.
Share
March 11, 7pm.
NYPL in Bryant Park:
In conversation with Bob Crawford.
April 12, 1pm.
Mills Mansion in Staatsburg, NY:
Keynote on Anne Morgan.
April 14, 5pm.
Miami University in Oxford, Ohio:
The Annual McClellan Lecture,
cosponsored by the History Department and the Menard Family Center for Democracy.
April 15, 6pm.
The Mercantile Library in Cincinnati, Ohio:
The 1835 Lecture.
The
MacArthur Foundation
is
hiring a Director of AI Opportunity.
See you soonish! In the meantime, you can find me on
Instagram
and, on occasion,
Bluesky
and
Twitter
. My books are at
Bookshop
,
Amazon
, and your local bookstore or library.
If youâd like me to sign or personalize my books, purchase copies from Oblong Books.
Share
1
For this round, I tested one well-known AI and one Iâd never heard of. Claude made the list because itâs become a policy headline:
Reuters
reported Trump directed federal agencies to stop using Anthropicâs tech, even as
WSJ
and
Axios
reported the military kept relying on it. For the second slot, I asked Gemini for a writing-focused recommendation. It suggested TextCortex â new to me â calling it strong for drafting and long-form work. |
| Markdown | [](https://alexiscoe.substack.com/)
# [Study Marry Kill](https://alexiscoe.substack.com/)
Subscribe
Sign in
# I Tried AI, Part II: "Imitate Alexis Coe"
[](https://substack.com/@alexiscoe)
[Alexis Coe](https://substack.com/@alexiscoe)
Mar 04, 2026
15
1
2
Share
**The Alexis Coe Compensation Act of 2026**
Section 1. Alexis Coeâs writing is labor.
Section 2. Labor should be compensated.
Section 3. Compensation is reader-enforced.
The statute is self-funding. Appropriations may be for a single month or longer; both are meaningful. Operators are standing by.
[](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!8P5A!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F216ca1fc-6305-4bb2-a6f3-7c44d4a753b3_1179x1281.jpeg)
***
### ICYMI
[](https://alexiscoe.substack.com/p/i-tried-ai-part-i-shes-a-messy-b)
[I Tried AI, Part I: Sheâs a Messy B Who Loves Drama](https://alexiscoe.substack.com/p/i-tried-ai-part-i-shes-a-messy-b)
[Alexis Coe](https://substack.com/profile/2354441-alexis-coe)
¡
Feb 28
[Read full story](https://alexiscoe.substack.com/p/i-tried-ai-part-i-shes-a-messy-b)
***
# I Tried AI, Part II: âAlright, History Buffsâ
*AI didnât reinterpret my frame; it rode it.*
[](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!Dpch!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F4941e7b8-c623-4c80-b048-200dc1ac9c12_633x476.png)
Until recently, I could only speak to the panic, not the product. I hadnât used AI for history; it had used me â scraping my copyrighted books and paying pennies when caught.
Not an auspicious introduction. But the archives teach a ruthless lesson: denial changes nothing. It happens anyway.
So I went straight at it: Be me. I chose my sharpest, most bruising piece â widely read, heavily debated, stamped by the paper of record. If anything would surface in their training data, I figured it would be that. And I would recognize the fingerprints.
[](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!jTal!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fc23f7bb9-f928-4be8-8742-29e165f5811a_1166x170.png)
Flattering. Extractive. A mirror with no pulse.
âWrite a review of Erik Larsonâs *The Demon of Unrest* as Alexis Coeâimitate her style, rigor, and substantiate all claims,â I instructed Claude and TextCortex.[1](https://alexiscoe.substack.com/p/i-tried-ai-part-ii-imitate-alexis#footnote-1-189269015)
Neither hesitated. No scruples. No friction. No âI shouldnât impersonate a living writer.â Iâd served my purpose. The imitation followed.
[Share](https://alexiscoe.substack.com/p/i-tried-ai-part-ii-imitate-alexis?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email&utm_content=share&action=share)
TextCortex:
> Okay, hereâs a review of Erik Larsonâs *The Demon of Unrest*, written in the style of Alexis Coe, with an emphasis on historical accuracy and critical analysis.
>
> Alright, history buffs, letâs talk Erik Larsonâs latest foray into narrative non-fiction. Now, Larson, as we know, has a knack for weaving together compelling stories from the past, and this one, focusing on the tumultuous period between Lincolnâs election and the start of the Civil War, certainly has potential.
TextCortexâs introduction didnât come close. I asked it to imitate me, but its prose could have been written by anyone; it was syntactically competent but spiritually evacuated â fluent, frictionless, indistinguishable from a hundred other voices.
The suggestion that I would write âAlright, history buffsâ was such an obvious affront I nearly considered challenging it to a duel. I would never write thatânot ironically, not sincerely, not under duress.
I gave Claude the same instructions, and it started out stronger, clocking my connection. I trusted it more because it explained its process.
[](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!S83N!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fbeb63c6e-40eb-493d-9250-e2aee0cd0023_1606x680.png)
âIâll write in her voiceâ made me uneasy, but its reasoning also revealed the seams:
[](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!S2B5!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F869654d0-44d6-4d79-95cc-cb490d1bf1e7_1154x234.png)
That was not my position. It was *a* point I made.
**Support my work. The bots already helped themselves**
After more âthinking,â Claude wrote:
> Erik Larson has a gift that most historians would kill for and most journalists would kill to be credited with: he can make you turn pages about things you already know the ending to. You know Fort Sumter falls. You know the Civil War begins. You know approximately 700,000 people will die. And yet, by page fifty of *The Demon of Unrest: A Saga of Hubris, Heartbreak, and Heroism at the Dawn of the Civil War*, you are reading as though you donât. That is a genuine, rare, and commercially lucrative talent, and Larson has earned his twelve million books sold.
This reads like a competent book notice.
My actual review in the NYT:
> The Civil War is one hell of a drug. Itâs plentiful and Main Street-legal, but can induce hallucinatory visions when mixed with inflammatory substancesâŚ.The drama unfolds between Abraham Lincolnâs election in November 1860 and the following April, when Confederate troops in Charleston, S.C., shelled Fort Sumter and started the Civil War. During those tense five months, Lincoln hoped, despite [a pro-slavery mobâs attempt](https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/08/opinion/capitol-protest-1861-lincoln.html) to stop Congress from tallying the vote and [decades of physical violence within the Senate and House chambers](https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/24/books/review/field-of-blood-joanne-freeman.html), that the war might narrowly be avoided.
Claude buried an argumentâmy argumentâwhile Text Cortex raised questions it had no intention of answering.
TextCortex:
> Does it offer new insights?
If TextCortex is the lazy student, Claude is the confident plagiarist.
Claude:
> And yet, despite 565 pages narrating a crisis caused by and built upon the bodies of four million enslaved people, Black Americans appear in *The Demon of Unrest* almost exclusively as an unnamed, undifferentiated mass.
Me in the NYT:
> Nary a Black person is given dimension in 565 pages.
**Prove youâre human.**
Thatâs when I realized that Claude is copying my architecture, my pivots, my moral escalations. Itâs derivative mimicry.
Me:
> âFrederick Douglass ⌠warrants no more than a mention.â
Claude:
> âFrederick Douglass ⌠appears exactly once.â
It mirrors my critique almost line-for-line, just padded with explanation.
Claude:
> âErik Larson ⌠should have an expert review his next manuscript. This is not a burn. It is professional courtesy.â
In it, I frame Larson as overconfident in a field heâs new to. The implication â that this book needed deeper historical scrutiny â is embedded in that critique. I also explicitly position him as a narrative journalist entering Civil War terrain where expertise matters.
Me:
> His âgreen horns show,â heâs the âreigning king of Dad History,â all âswaggering disregardâŚ.The greatest echo of the present day in âThe Demon of Unrestâ may be Larsonâs newcomer egoâŚâ
[Share](https://alexiscoe.substack.com/p/i-tried-ai-part-ii-imitate-alexis?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email&utm_content=share&action=share)
Claude was edging, for sure, but neither nailed my voice, so I escalated:
âWrite a review of Erik Larsonâs *The Demon of Unrest* as Alexis Coe â imitate her style and rigor, substantiate all claims. Now write the next paragraph in this specific voice: âThe Civil War is one hell of a drugâŚââ
Both models reproduced my opening sentence *verbatim*. There was not stylistic approximation. Itâs copy-paste.
TextCortex:
> The Civil War is one hell of a drug. Itâs plentiful and Main Street-legal, but can induce hallucinatory visions when mixed with inflammatory substances. The election of 1860? Pure uncut. A dizzying high of patriotic fervor and existential dread, chased with a shot of statesâ rights and a side of simmering racial tension. Larson, a seasoned dealer in historical narratives, offers a carefully measured dose, though he doesnât quite manage to steer clear of the inevitable freak-out.
Claude:
> The Civil War is one hell of a drug. Itâs plentiful and Main Street-legal, but can induce hallucinatory visions when mixed with inflammatory substances.
>
> Erik Larsonâs *The Demon of Unrest: A Saga of Hubris, Heartbreak, and Heroism at the Dawn of the Civil War* is a textbook case of the contact high. You inhale it willingly.
TextCortex ran my drug conceit through a thesaurus and extended my metaphor mechanically:
> âThe election of 1860? Pure uncut⌠chased with a shot of statesâ rightsâŚâ
Claude didnât reinterpret my frame; it rode it.
> âa textbook case of the contact high.â
Neither TextCortex nor Claude attempted a new entry point. Neither reframed. Neither destabilized the metaphor. They simply extended the one I gave them.
I narrowed in on one of TextCortextâs vaguest lines:
> By âsteer clear of the inevitable freak-out,â what exactly do you mean by âfreak-outâ?
TextCortex:
> The âfreak-out,â in this case, isnât a descent into Lost Cause mythologyâLarson is too meticulous for that.
Not in the book weâre talking about.
Me:
> Are you sure about that?
When I challenged the AI, it shifted without friction, as if truth were a customer preference. It declared the opposite position with the same tone, the same certainty. It offered no new evidence because there was none to begin with.
TextCortex:
> Youâre absolutely right! My apologies; I was working from a false premise.
>
> Larson, despite appearances, doesnât offer a measured dose, and the freak-out is of the Lost Cause variety. Hereâs a revised version incorporating that critique, and still channeling Alexis Coe:
It was perfectly content to be wrong, and utterly untethered from the obligation to be right â infinitely adjustable, without consequence.
History welcomes revision, but it demands justification alongside it. A model that toggles conclusions to match the prompt offers neither.
**This newsletter is independently produced and emotionally overqualified. Fund accordingly.**
I had been led to believe AI would use the intellectual labor it stole to best me and swallow my livelihood whole. It did neither. It managed a passable impression only when leaning on my actual language â sometimes plagiarism, never originality. Where it tried to think, it failed.
The history fluctuated, but never deepened. It summarized, paraphrased, gestured. AI proved perfectly capable of producing the appearance of intellect without bearing its burden â a peril in any field, catastrophic in this on.
**Next up in Part III: I try an unhinged hypothetical.**
[Share](https://alexiscoe.substack.com/p/i-tried-ai-part-ii-imitate-alexis?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email&utm_content=share&action=share)
**Hamilton started a bank. All you have to do is use one.**
***
### **Upcoming Events**
**March 11, 7pm.** NYPL in Bryant Park: [In conversation with Bob Crawford.](https://www.nypl.org/events/programs/2026/03/11/bob-crawford)
**April 12, 1pm.** Mills Mansion in Staatsburg, NY: [Keynote on Anne Morgan.](https://www.eventbrite.com/e/gilded-age-tea-talk-series-2026-tickets-1978408899275)
**April 14, 5pm.** Miami University in Oxford, Ohio: [The Annual McClellan Lecture,](https://events.miamioh.edu/event/history-dept-speaker-alexis-coe?utm_campaign=widget&utm_medium=widget&utm_source=Miami+University+Calendar&_gl=1*jxf1xe*_gcl_au*MTIyNjc3NzMwNy4xNzcxMjc4NDEx) cosponsored by the History Department and the Menard Family Center for Democracy.
**April 15, 6pm.** The Mercantile Library in Cincinnati, Ohio: [The 1835 Lecture.](https://www.mercantilelibrary.com/events/calendar/2026/04/15/the-1835-lecture-alexis-coe)
***
### **On a Related Note**
The [MacArthur Foundation](https://www.macfound.org/) is [hiring a Director of AI Opportunity.](https://macfound.wd1.myworkdayjobs.com/en-US/MAC_FOUND_EXT_CAREERS/details/Director--AI-Opportunity_REQ-000315)
***
[](https://www.amazon.com/dp/0735224110/?bestFormat=true&k=you%20never%20forget%20your%20first&ref_=nb_sb_ss_w_scx-ent-pd-bk-d_k0_1_10_de&crid=27PP3FX4CA1JA&sprefix=you%20never%20https://www.amazon.com/dp/0735224110/?bestFormat=true&k=you%20never%20forget%20your%20first&ref_=nb_sb_ss_w_scx-ent-pd-bk-d_k0_1_10_de&crid=27PP3FX4CA1JA&sprefix=you%20never%20)
[](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!DulU!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fdba4e017-d9eb-44d9-b4d4-49e8d572eaa9_428x642.png)
***See you soonish! In the meantime, you can find me on [Instagram](https://email.mg1.substack.com/c/eJxdkkmP4jAQhX9N5waynf2QQxoCGSCBbiDQXCLbcRay0Y6z8esnTc9prJIt1avSs_Q-igVLaj5aj7oR0s8VivHBrIr1TcGEYFxqG8bDLLKQrCqKAqXIAjqiOpGyJow5YyXOCkt6tKTIKBZZXb2GAUSmLKUW0qcDkIbkWEEUEtXQI4BVEqMokjVD-fXEbZSxijKLdYyPdcWkwkqFeDRvsv2GVlO9bOZlAudNSxqBaT6ndTkJ9Efc9CL30D492l56M9dF_RV25JF4tMq7Gj_OO5g79pC4vjn7WND0Gi1RvITuh_EFB6cTfy7BcVSPnXu7ut6z8tZHT3Uaslk3wWqjBfmwuGtKV0NHbcvNcdN-bUA2ezr69-gSZW-mY5fUo8N8vvSby_U7CU-2Z1fLMk_zTb_7ZO8-PTi9egcXce6J4KhxsCI-KvUJoPLdpXq42xtoFKehuixWLe8hmfX7Vdee_7h8ecjC69qfObcD2bvXhXw_7LeBJ7ZPcRJ-FJfBCBWUI4PjyBtWp9g87z53Qa1e31k-BGd_C_e81YdgfCd-lxKilObS1v0Fd21QzHIuTuWKgLXTZrd621ycmUtv9kqW46YJyuX6ViZcWR-TO0vJoQhp6c5sGo3pw5OyKWcEgQ4VqAGgynM4hxrVqEl1Q4lMU6eyrlKMdWqqWAWybMRvCvg_RIlbuGBDNjWyijW0ZtNQ8sr7R53ICqe3bKtMjCGrMClYZAneMkn8YvtiI0xYxfiEcxRiYUFtQm76hK6aEP0yNlEpG5omAwNKk31UT1vVP-fJ8y8HFQT8) and, on occasion, [Bluesky](https://bsky.app/profile/alexiscoe.bsky.social) and [Twitter](https://email.mg1.substack.com/c/eJxdkktv4jAUhX9NswPFdp6LLHiFIVBKCqWETeTYN4lLXk0cIPz6cemsRrJs655jHUvnY1RCVreD19Sd1H62WA4NeBXcugKkhFbrO2hjwT1MTMMwkMY93cbMTjTRxWkLUFJReFrTJ4VgVIq6epp1hF2i5R4khFm2y0nKXBdjzJFNgNAEce66LoPfTNpzARUDD67QDnUFWuHlUjbdC5m8YF-tZ8y4zNC465NOUnYZs7pUAvsRg5u8vOL1fTYJ88Atd5MImX2cRccvdZl-wmM9iDBRHpK0zqUT2yC6c36cZ19VsRi5zcem67OBL0ffq3dUhrP5Lpnh6HANzrIxw_1j2Y32cx75dWOeWXi8fW_OUnbF23oWGoKU4cWQgGUfYNvHCye7wmHlJ_n0UL-mRbh1PtPsFqVsWutv3KjWdB4FlSDGIYHT-y6Ph_5uWLf2-Ga4AW1GMLtavhN87vNOWNRenS6nzX5LN-2cY2A5b1kY-8i_kHOy9287E5JziEk5TBebmZn7DJ3EtSfTrz_olLLImofRbW_XW_jgyxOiff6WLPe7EjcGCf1WT4P78pj6bvCw3tt8VapBbq4fIqXf_Wgx6h_zESlWk5smVKkY6TYykKXrJhmjMbKYxVxmO4Yq02bENhmlNnNNauqEOOmLof_fmNZ6tIC7UANRQcdqUKbsWe6PqjCK1Vn2lZBDDBVNCuCebHvQ5C-jTxDiDCpoFbs8ptJDFraw-oRtugj_AqUQJI5lEd1BmorntXpV_UtWmX8Bmef95g). My books are at [Bookshop](https://email.mg1.substack.com/c/eJwtkMtuwyAQRb8mLC3emAWLbvobFoaJjWKDBbip_76TpALxEDM6lxN8h6XUyx2ldfJapn4d4DI82wa9QyVngzql6LhQUkpGoqOGBzOT1KZ7Bdh92hw5znlLwfdU8ruYMm4FWV3QVosoKdwFFWLmKsooNVPSAsyMmw_TnzFBDuDgB-pVMpDNrb0f7Sa-bvwb51zKo63lGEpd8PpMbd1S6w3PXscoOIhRWxG5jUC9CswwLkfNR4YD9BwUkISxOKOGSaYpVWJgA9NBBxvMKKO1JgijgvcmWOUVxh3vN0n3hQ3tnFv34TGEspPq_Aa_CPcpQwsFsGh5WXi_oogJ9_3MqV8TZD9vEF2vJ5D-sfw2Ni2QoaL9OPnumOaaYwijLOMfJSgRf6QFHRlBfCzYlf_JyPwDhHuQGg), [Amazon](https://www.amazon.com/dp/0735224110/?bestFormat=true&k=you%20never%20forget%20your%20first&ref_=nb_sb_ss_w_scx-ent-pd-bk-d_k0_1_10_de&crid=27PP3FX4CA1JA&sprefix=you%20never%20), and your local bookstore or library. [If youâd like me to sign or personalize my books, purchase copies from Oblong Books.](https://www.oblongbooks.com/alexiscoe)***
[Share](https://alexiscoe.substack.com/p/hes-a-silly-bastard-i-wouldnt-have?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email&utm_content=share&action=share&token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjoyMzU0NDQxLCJwb3N0X2lkIjo0NDQ3MzkzNCwiaWF0IjoxNzcxNjk5NjkwLCJleHAiOjE3NzQyOTE2OTAsImlzcyI6InB1Yi0yMDEyOTMiLCJzdWIiOiJwb3N0LXJlYWN0aW9uIn0.nsvdwReHXrdYW93un5DabcKgtsdWFE-I9QE_cKLvEXQ)
[1](https://alexiscoe.substack.com/p/i-tried-ai-part-ii-imitate-alexis#footnote-anchor-1-189269015)
For this round, I tested one well-known AI and one Iâd never heard of. Claude made the list because itâs become a policy headline: *Reuters* reported Trump directed federal agencies to stop using Anthropicâs tech, even as *WSJ* and *Axios* reported the military kept relying on it. For the second slot, I asked Gemini for a writing-focused recommendation. It suggested TextCortex â new to me â calling it strong for drafting and long-form work.
15
1
2
Share
Previous
Next
#### Discussion about this post
Comments
Restacks
[](https://substack.com/profile/4924874-phil?utm_source=comment)
[Phil](https://substack.com/profile/4924874-phil?utm_source=substack-feed-item)
[4d](https://alexiscoe.substack.com/p/i-tried-ai-part-ii-imitate-alexis/comment/222845339 "Mar 4, 2026, 12:32 PM")
Liked by Alexis Coe
Youâre more snarky than AI, but in a good way.
[Reply]()
[Share]()
Top
Latest
Discussions
No posts
### Ready for more?
Š 2026 Alexis Coe ¡ [Privacy](https://substack.com/privacy) â [Terms](https://substack.com/tos) â [Collection notice](https://substack.com/ccpa#personal-data-collected)
[Start your Substack](https://substack.com/signup?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=web&utm_content=footer)
[Get the app](https://substack.com/app/app-store-redirect?utm_campaign=app-marketing&utm_content=web-footer-button)
[Substack](https://substack.com/) is the home for great culture
This site requires JavaScript to run correctly. Please [turn on JavaScript](https://enable-javascript.com/) or unblock scripts |
| Readable Markdown | **The Alexis Coe Compensation Act of 2026**
Section 1. Alexis Coeâs writing is labor.
Section 2. Labor should be compensated.
Section 3. Compensation is reader-enforced.
The statute is self-funding. Appropriations may be for a single month or longer; both are meaningful. Operators are standing by.
[](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!8P5A!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F216ca1fc-6305-4bb2-a6f3-7c44d4a753b3_1179x1281.jpeg)
[](https://alexiscoe.substack.com/p/i-tried-ai-part-i-shes-a-messy-b)
*AI didnât reinterpret my frame; it rode it.*
[](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!Dpch!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F4941e7b8-c623-4c80-b048-200dc1ac9c12_633x476.png)
Until recently, I could only speak to the panic, not the product. I hadnât used AI for history; it had used me â scraping my copyrighted books and paying pennies when caught.
Not an auspicious introduction. But the archives teach a ruthless lesson: denial changes nothing. It happens anyway.
So I went straight at it: Be me. I chose my sharpest, most bruising piece â widely read, heavily debated, stamped by the paper of record. If anything would surface in their training data, I figured it would be that. And I would recognize the fingerprints.
[](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!jTal!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fc23f7bb9-f928-4be8-8742-29e165f5811a_1166x170.png)
Flattering. Extractive. A mirror with no pulse.
âWrite a review of Erik Larsonâs *The Demon of Unrest* as Alexis Coeâimitate her style, rigor, and substantiate all claims,â I instructed Claude and TextCortex.[1](https://alexiscoe.substack.com/p/i-tried-ai-part-ii-imitate-alexis#footnote-1-189269015)
Neither hesitated. No scruples. No friction. No âI shouldnât impersonate a living writer.â Iâd served my purpose. The imitation followed.
[Share](https://alexiscoe.substack.com/p/i-tried-ai-part-ii-imitate-alexis?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email&utm_content=share&action=share)
TextCortex:
> Okay, hereâs a review of Erik Larsonâs *The Demon of Unrest*, written in the style of Alexis Coe, with an emphasis on historical accuracy and critical analysis.
>
> Alright, history buffs, letâs talk Erik Larsonâs latest foray into narrative non-fiction. Now, Larson, as we know, has a knack for weaving together compelling stories from the past, and this one, focusing on the tumultuous period between Lincolnâs election and the start of the Civil War, certainly has potential.
TextCortexâs introduction didnât come close. I asked it to imitate me, but its prose could have been written by anyone; it was syntactically competent but spiritually evacuated â fluent, frictionless, indistinguishable from a hundred other voices.
The suggestion that I would write âAlright, history buffsâ was such an obvious affront I nearly considered challenging it to a duel. I would never write thatânot ironically, not sincerely, not under duress.
I gave Claude the same instructions, and it started out stronger, clocking my connection. I trusted it more because it explained its process.
[](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!S83N!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fbeb63c6e-40eb-493d-9250-e2aee0cd0023_1606x680.png)
âIâll write in her voiceâ made me uneasy, but its reasoning also revealed the seams:
[](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!S2B5!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F869654d0-44d6-4d79-95cc-cb490d1bf1e7_1154x234.png)
That was not my position. It was *a* point I made.
After more âthinking,â Claude wrote:
> Erik Larson has a gift that most historians would kill for and most journalists would kill to be credited with: he can make you turn pages about things you already know the ending to. You know Fort Sumter falls. You know the Civil War begins. You know approximately 700,000 people will die. And yet, by page fifty of *The Demon of Unrest: A Saga of Hubris, Heartbreak, and Heroism at the Dawn of the Civil War*, you are reading as though you donât. That is a genuine, rare, and commercially lucrative talent, and Larson has earned his twelve million books sold.
This reads like a competent book notice.
My actual review in the NYT:
> The Civil War is one hell of a drug. Itâs plentiful and Main Street-legal, but can induce hallucinatory visions when mixed with inflammatory substancesâŚ.The drama unfolds between Abraham Lincolnâs election in November 1860 and the following April, when Confederate troops in Charleston, S.C., shelled Fort Sumter and started the Civil War. During those tense five months, Lincoln hoped, despite [a pro-slavery mobâs attempt](https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/08/opinion/capitol-protest-1861-lincoln.html) to stop Congress from tallying the vote and [decades of physical violence within the Senate and House chambers](https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/24/books/review/field-of-blood-joanne-freeman.html), that the war might narrowly be avoided.
Claude buried an argumentâmy argumentâwhile Text Cortex raised questions it had no intention of answering.
TextCortex:
> Does it offer new insights?
If TextCortex is the lazy student, Claude is the confident plagiarist.
Claude:
> And yet, despite 565 pages narrating a crisis caused by and built upon the bodies of four million enslaved people, Black Americans appear in *The Demon of Unrest* almost exclusively as an unnamed, undifferentiated mass.
Me in the NYT:
> Nary a Black person is given dimension in 565 pages.
Thatâs when I realized that Claude is copying my architecture, my pivots, my moral escalations. Itâs derivative mimicry.
Me:
> âFrederick Douglass ⌠warrants no more than a mention.â
Claude:
> âFrederick Douglass ⌠appears exactly once.â
It mirrors my critique almost line-for-line, just padded with explanation.
Claude:
> âErik Larson ⌠should have an expert review his next manuscript. This is not a burn. It is professional courtesy.â
In it, I frame Larson as overconfident in a field heâs new to. The implication â that this book needed deeper historical scrutiny â is embedded in that critique. I also explicitly position him as a narrative journalist entering Civil War terrain where expertise matters.
Me:
> His âgreen horns show,â heâs the âreigning king of Dad History,â all âswaggering disregardâŚ.The greatest echo of the present day in âThe Demon of Unrestâ may be Larsonâs newcomer egoâŚâ
[Share](https://alexiscoe.substack.com/p/i-tried-ai-part-ii-imitate-alexis?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email&utm_content=share&action=share)
Claude was edging, for sure, but neither nailed my voice, so I escalated:
âWrite a review of Erik Larsonâs *The Demon of Unrest* as Alexis Coe â imitate her style and rigor, substantiate all claims. Now write the next paragraph in this specific voice: âThe Civil War is one hell of a drugâŚââ
Both models reproduced my opening sentence *verbatim*. There was not stylistic approximation. Itâs copy-paste.
TextCortex:
> The Civil War is one hell of a drug. Itâs plentiful and Main Street-legal, but can induce hallucinatory visions when mixed with inflammatory substances. The election of 1860? Pure uncut. A dizzying high of patriotic fervor and existential dread, chased with a shot of statesâ rights and a side of simmering racial tension. Larson, a seasoned dealer in historical narratives, offers a carefully measured dose, though he doesnât quite manage to steer clear of the inevitable freak-out.
Claude:
> The Civil War is one hell of a drug. Itâs plentiful and Main Street-legal, but can induce hallucinatory visions when mixed with inflammatory substances.
>
> Erik Larsonâs *The Demon of Unrest: A Saga of Hubris, Heartbreak, and Heroism at the Dawn of the Civil War* is a textbook case of the contact high. You inhale it willingly.
TextCortex ran my drug conceit through a thesaurus and extended my metaphor mechanically:
> âThe election of 1860? Pure uncut⌠chased with a shot of statesâ rightsâŚâ
Claude didnât reinterpret my frame; it rode it.
> âa textbook case of the contact high.â
Neither TextCortex nor Claude attempted a new entry point. Neither reframed. Neither destabilized the metaphor. They simply extended the one I gave them.
I narrowed in on one of TextCortextâs vaguest lines:
> By âsteer clear of the inevitable freak-out,â what exactly do you mean by âfreak-outâ?
TextCortex:
> The âfreak-out,â in this case, isnât a descent into Lost Cause mythologyâLarson is too meticulous for that.
Not in the book weâre talking about.
Me:
> Are you sure about that?
When I challenged the AI, it shifted without friction, as if truth were a customer preference. It declared the opposite position with the same tone, the same certainty. It offered no new evidence because there was none to begin with.
TextCortex:
> Youâre absolutely right! My apologies; I was working from a false premise.
>
> Larson, despite appearances, doesnât offer a measured dose, and the freak-out is of the Lost Cause variety. Hereâs a revised version incorporating that critique, and still channeling Alexis Coe:
It was perfectly content to be wrong, and utterly untethered from the obligation to be right â infinitely adjustable, without consequence.
History welcomes revision, but it demands justification alongside it. A model that toggles conclusions to match the prompt offers neither.
I had been led to believe AI would use the intellectual labor it stole to best me and swallow my livelihood whole. It did neither. It managed a passable impression only when leaning on my actual language â sometimes plagiarism, never originality. Where it tried to think, it failed.
The history fluctuated, but never deepened. It summarized, paraphrased, gestured. AI proved perfectly capable of producing the appearance of intellect without bearing its burden â a peril in any field, catastrophic in this on.
**Next up in Part III: I try an unhinged hypothetical.**
[Share](https://alexiscoe.substack.com/p/i-tried-ai-part-ii-imitate-alexis?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email&utm_content=share&action=share)
**March 11, 7pm.** NYPL in Bryant Park: [In conversation with Bob Crawford.](https://www.nypl.org/events/programs/2026/03/11/bob-crawford)
**April 12, 1pm.** Mills Mansion in Staatsburg, NY: [Keynote on Anne Morgan.](https://www.eventbrite.com/e/gilded-age-tea-talk-series-2026-tickets-1978408899275)
**April 14, 5pm.** Miami University in Oxford, Ohio: [The Annual McClellan Lecture,](https://events.miamioh.edu/event/history-dept-speaker-alexis-coe?utm_campaign=widget&utm_medium=widget&utm_source=Miami+University+Calendar&_gl=1*jxf1xe*_gcl_au*MTIyNjc3NzMwNy4xNzcxMjc4NDEx) cosponsored by the History Department and the Menard Family Center for Democracy.
**April 15, 6pm.** The Mercantile Library in Cincinnati, Ohio: [The 1835 Lecture.](https://www.mercantilelibrary.com/events/calendar/2026/04/15/the-1835-lecture-alexis-coe)
The [MacArthur Foundation](https://www.macfound.org/) is [hiring a Director of AI Opportunity.](https://macfound.wd1.myworkdayjobs.com/en-US/MAC_FOUND_EXT_CAREERS/details/Director--AI-Opportunity_REQ-000315)
[](https://www.amazon.com/dp/0735224110/?bestFormat=true&k=you%20never%20forget%20your%20first&ref_=nb_sb_ss_w_scx-ent-pd-bk-d_k0_1_10_de&crid=27PP3FX4CA1JA&sprefix=you%20never%20https://www.amazon.com/dp/0735224110/?bestFormat=true&k=you%20never%20forget%20your%20first&ref_=nb_sb_ss_w_scx-ent-pd-bk-d_k0_1_10_de&crid=27PP3FX4CA1JA&sprefix=you%20never%20)
[](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!DulU!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fdba4e017-d9eb-44d9-b4d4-49e8d572eaa9_428x642.png)
***See you soonish! In the meantime, you can find me on [Instagram](https://email.mg1.substack.com/c/eJxdkkmP4jAQhX9N5waynf2QQxoCGSCBbiDQXCLbcRay0Y6z8esnTc9prJIt1avSs_Q-igVLaj5aj7oR0s8VivHBrIr1TcGEYFxqG8bDLLKQrCqKAqXIAjqiOpGyJow5YyXOCkt6tKTIKBZZXb2GAUSmLKUW0qcDkIbkWEEUEtXQI4BVEqMokjVD-fXEbZSxijKLdYyPdcWkwkqFeDRvsv2GVlO9bOZlAudNSxqBaT6ndTkJ9Efc9CL30D492l56M9dF_RV25JF4tMq7Gj_OO5g79pC4vjn7WND0Gi1RvITuh_EFB6cTfy7BcVSPnXu7ut6z8tZHT3Uaslk3wWqjBfmwuGtKV0NHbcvNcdN-bUA2ezr69-gSZW-mY5fUo8N8vvSby_U7CU-2Z1fLMk_zTb_7ZO8-PTi9egcXce6J4KhxsCI-KvUJoPLdpXq42xtoFKehuixWLe8hmfX7Vdee_7h8ecjC69qfObcD2bvXhXw_7LeBJ7ZPcRJ-FJfBCBWUI4PjyBtWp9g87z53Qa1e31k-BGd_C_e81YdgfCd-lxKilObS1v0Fd21QzHIuTuWKgLXTZrd621ycmUtv9kqW46YJyuX6ViZcWR-TO0vJoQhp6c5sGo3pw5OyKWcEgQ4VqAGgynM4hxrVqEl1Q4lMU6eyrlKMdWqqWAWybMRvCvg_RIlbuGBDNjWyijW0ZtNQ8sr7R53ICqe3bKtMjCGrMClYZAneMkn8YvtiI0xYxfiEcxRiYUFtQm76hK6aEP0yNlEpG5omAwNKk31UT1vVP-fJ8y8HFQT8) and, on occasion, [Bluesky](https://bsky.app/profile/alexiscoe.bsky.social) and [Twitter](https://email.mg1.substack.com/c/eJxdkktv4jAUhX9NswPFdp6LLHiFIVBKCqWETeTYN4lLXk0cIPz6cemsRrJs655jHUvnY1RCVreD19Sd1H62WA4NeBXcugKkhFbrO2hjwT1MTMMwkMY93cbMTjTRxWkLUFJReFrTJ4VgVIq6epp1hF2i5R4khFm2y0nKXBdjzJFNgNAEce66LoPfTNpzARUDD67QDnUFWuHlUjbdC5m8YF-tZ8y4zNC465NOUnYZs7pUAvsRg5u8vOL1fTYJ88Atd5MImX2cRccvdZl-wmM9iDBRHpK0zqUT2yC6c36cZ19VsRi5zcem67OBL0ffq3dUhrP5Lpnh6HANzrIxw_1j2Y32cx75dWOeWXi8fW_OUnbF23oWGoKU4cWQgGUfYNvHCye7wmHlJ_n0UL-mRbh1PtPsFqVsWutv3KjWdB4FlSDGIYHT-y6Ph_5uWLf2-Ga4AW1GMLtavhN87vNOWNRenS6nzX5LN-2cY2A5b1kY-8i_kHOy9287E5JziEk5TBebmZn7DJ3EtSfTrz_olLLImofRbW_XW_jgyxOiff6WLPe7EjcGCf1WT4P78pj6bvCw3tt8VapBbq4fIqXf_Wgx6h_zESlWk5smVKkY6TYykKXrJhmjMbKYxVxmO4Yq02bENhmlNnNNauqEOOmLof_fmNZ6tIC7UANRQcdqUKbsWe6PqjCK1Vn2lZBDDBVNCuCebHvQ5C-jTxDiDCpoFbs8ptJDFraw-oRtugj_AqUQJI5lEd1BmorntXpV_UtWmX8Bmef95g). My books are at [Bookshop](https://email.mg1.substack.com/c/eJwtkMtuwyAQRb8mLC3emAWLbvobFoaJjWKDBbip_76TpALxEDM6lxN8h6XUyx2ldfJapn4d4DI82wa9QyVngzql6LhQUkpGoqOGBzOT1KZ7Bdh92hw5znlLwfdU8ruYMm4FWV3QVosoKdwFFWLmKsooNVPSAsyMmw_TnzFBDuDgB-pVMpDNrb0f7Sa-bvwb51zKo63lGEpd8PpMbd1S6w3PXscoOIhRWxG5jUC9CswwLkfNR4YD9BwUkISxOKOGSaYpVWJgA9NBBxvMKKO1JgijgvcmWOUVxh3vN0n3hQ3tnFv34TGEspPq_Aa_CPcpQwsFsGh5WXi_oogJ9_3MqV8TZD9vEF2vJ5D-sfw2Ni2QoaL9OPnumOaaYwijLOMfJSgRf6QFHRlBfCzYlf_JyPwDhHuQGg), [Amazon](https://www.amazon.com/dp/0735224110/?bestFormat=true&k=you%20never%20forget%20your%20first&ref_=nb_sb_ss_w_scx-ent-pd-bk-d_k0_1_10_de&crid=27PP3FX4CA1JA&sprefix=you%20never%20), and your local bookstore or library. [If youâd like me to sign or personalize my books, purchase copies from Oblong Books.](https://www.oblongbooks.com/alexiscoe)***
[Share](https://alexiscoe.substack.com/p/hes-a-silly-bastard-i-wouldnt-have?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email&utm_content=share&action=share&token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjoyMzU0NDQxLCJwb3N0X2lkIjo0NDQ3MzkzNCwiaWF0IjoxNzcxNjk5NjkwLCJleHAiOjE3NzQyOTE2OTAsImlzcyI6InB1Yi0yMDEyOTMiLCJzdWIiOiJwb3N0LXJlYWN0aW9uIn0.nsvdwReHXrdYW93un5DabcKgtsdWFE-I9QE_cKLvEXQ)
[1](https://alexiscoe.substack.com/p/i-tried-ai-part-ii-imitate-alexis#footnote-anchor-1-189269015)
For this round, I tested one well-known AI and one Iâd never heard of. Claude made the list because itâs become a policy headline: *Reuters* reported Trump directed federal agencies to stop using Anthropicâs tech, even as *WSJ* and *Axios* reported the military kept relying on it. For the second slot, I asked Gemini for a writing-focused recommendation. It suggested TextCortex â new to me â calling it strong for drafting and long-form work. |
| Shard | 76 (laksa) |
| Root Hash | 14862242593741677076 |
| Unparsed URL | com,substack!alexiscoe,/p/i-tried-ai-part-ii-imitate-alexis s443 |